Anastronomical complexorcommemorative astronomical complexis a series of man-made structures with anastronomicalpurpose. It has been used when referring to a group ofMegalithicstructures that it is claimed show high precision astronomical alignments.[1][2]For the study ofArchaeoastronomy,such complexes of similar structures are required for adequate measurement and calculation to ensure that similar celestial sightlines were intended by the designers. These arrangements have also been known as observational,ceremonialorritualcomplexes with importance for the study of prehistoric cultures.

The term has been used in the naming of various series ofobservatoriesused for observing the stars in modern times.[3][4]

Ancient astronomical complexes

edit

Examples of suggested ancient astronomical complexes that may have been used assolarandlunarobservatoriesinclude, in reverse-chronological order:

Mesoamerica

edit

Western Europe

edit

Central Europe

edit

Levant

edit
  • In 2006, thenAtlit Yamwas discovered in Israel in 2009, dated with certainty to at least 6300 BCE, at which point it was abandoned and submerged in the Mediterranean, but still being excavated and analyzed as of 2014. Atlit Yam has human skeletons ceremoniously buried, and is a small semi-circle of long, narrow uprighted stones etched withcup marks.
  • Rogem Hiri,40,000,000 kg of stone with a 'gate' or opening in the outer stone circle through which the sun rises on each Summer Solstice (with this 'gate' matching the Summer Solstice's sunrise even more accurately millennia ago), and a burial chamber in the center under two 5-tonne megaliths, a layer of circa 3,000 BCE exposed, with a surveyed but unexcavated, estimated 4,000 BCE, layer beneath.
  • Mnajdraand otherMegalithic Temples of Malta,circa 3100 BCE and younger.

Modern astronomical complexes

edit

Examples of modern astronomical complexes ofstellarobservatories include:

References

edit
  1. ^Juan Pedro Laporte(1993).Tikal y Uaxactún en el preclásico.UNAM. pp. 5, 9, 27, 37, 38, 72, 79, 81, 86 & 90.ISBN978-968-36-2673-8.Retrieved13 March2011.
  2. ^Fialko, Vilma., Laporte, Juan Pedro., New Perspectives on Old Problems: Dynastic references for the Early Classic at Tikal. In Vision and Revision in Maya Studies, edited by F. Clancy and P. Harrison, pp. 33–66, Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
  3. ^"National Parks and Reserves in Argentina: El Leoncito National Park".Ripio Turismo.Archivedfrom the original on 8 September 2006.Retrieved2006-09-06.
  4. ^"Public Outreach".Complejo Astronomico El Leoncito. Archived fromthe originalon 2006-08-29.Retrieved2006-09-06.
  5. ^Prudence M. Rice (2004).Maya Political Science: Time, Astronomy, and the Cosmos.University of Texas Press. p. 87.ISBN978-0-292-70569-2.
  6. ^University College; London. Institute of Archaeology (2000).Archaeology international.Institute of Archaeology, University College London.Retrieved22 April2011.
  7. ^Hawkins, Gerald., Stonehenge Decoded, Nature, 200, 306–308, 1963
  8. ^Hawkins, Gerald., Callanish, a Scottish Stonehenge, Science, 147, 127–130, 1965.
  9. ^D. C. Heggie (1982).Archaeoastronomy in the Old World.Cambridge University Press. p. 191.ISBN978-0-521-24734-4.
  10. ^Hoppit, David (1978). "The Wandlebury Enigma Solved? – Line A Loxodrome".Sunday Telegraph Magazine, Issue 78, March 18th.
  11. ^Johnson, Mark, R., University of Idaho Astronomical Complex, Moscow, Idaho, 214 pages, University of Idaho, 1984
  12. ^Grothkopf, Uta., Astronomical Society of the Pacific conference serie, Volume 153, p. 3, Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 1998.
  13. ^Henry Robinson Luce, Time, Volume 87, Issues 1–12, p. 84, Time Inc., 1966.