Barbettesare several types ofgun emplacementin terrestrial fortifications or on navalships.
In recent[when?]naval usage, a barbette is a protective circular armour support for a heavy gun turret. This evolved from earlier forms of gun protection that eventually led to thepre-dreadnought.The namebarbetteultimately comes fromfortification:it originally meant a raised platform or mound,[1]as in the French phraseen barbette,which refers to the practice of firing acannonover aparapetrather than through anembrasurein a fortification'scasemate.The former gives better angles of fire but less protection than the latter. Thedisappearing gunwas a variation on the barbette gun; it consisted of a heavy gun on acarriagethat would retract behind aparapetor into a gunpit for reloading. Barbettes were primarily used in coastal defences, but saw some use in a handful of warships, and some inland fortifications. The term is also used for certain aircraft gun mounts.
Shipboard barbettes were primarily used in armoured warships, starting in the 1860s during a period of intense experimentation with other mounting systems for heavy guns at sea. In these, gun barrels usually protruded over the barbette edge, so barbettes provided only partial protection, mainly for theammunitionsupply. Alternatives included the heavily-armouredgun turretand an armoured, fixedcentral gun battery.By the late 1880s, all three systems were replaced with a hybrid barbette-turret system that combined the benefits of both types. The armoured vertical tube that supported the new gun mount was referred to as a barbette.
Guns with restricted arcs of fire mounted in heavy bombers during World War II—such those in the tail of the aircraft, as opposed to fully revolving turrets—were also sometimes referred to as having barbette mounts, though usage of the term is primarily restricted to British publications. American authors generally refer to such mounts as tail guns or as tail gun turrets.
Use in fortifications
editThe use of barbette mountings originated in ground fortifications. The term originally referred to a raised platform on arampartfor one or more guns, enabling them to be fired over aparapet.[2]This gave rise to the phraseen barbette,which referred to a gun placed to fire over a parapet, rather than through anembrasure,an opening in a fortification wall. While anen barbetteemplacement offered wider arcs of fire, it also exposed the gun's crew to greater danger from hostile fire.[3]In addition, since the barbette position would be higher than acasemateposition—that is, a gun firing through an embrasure—it would generally have a greater field of fire.
The American military theoristDennis Hart Mahansuggested that light guns, particularlyhowitzers,were best suited for barbette emplacements since they could fire explosiveshellsand could be easily withdrawn when they came under enemy fire.[4]Fortifications in the 19th century typically employed both casemate and barbette emplacements. For example, the RussianConstantine BatteryoutsideSevastopolwas equipped with 43 heavy guns in its seaward side during theCrimean Warin the mid-1850s; of these, 27 were barbette mounted, with the rest in casemates.[5]
A modified version of the barbette type was thedisappearing gun,which placed a heavy gun on a carriage that retracted behind a parapet for reloading; this better protected the crew, and made the gun harder to target, since it was only visible while it was firing.[6]The type was usually used for coastal defence guns. As naval gun turrets improved to allow greater elevation and range, many disappearing guns, most of which were limited in elevation, were seen as obsolescent; with aircraft becoming prominent in the First World War, they were largely seen as obsolete. However, they remained in use through the early Second World War, at least by the United States, due to limited funding for replacement weapons between the wars.[7][8]
Later heavy coastal guns were often protected in hybrid installations, in wide casemates with cantilevered overhead cover partially covering a barbette orgunhousemount.[9]
Use in warships
editFollowing the introduction ofironclad warshipsin the early 1860s, naval designers grappled with the problem of mounting heavy guns in the most efficient way possible, beginning withbroadsidebox batteriesand quickly moving to rotatinggun turrets,since these afforded the ability to fire directly ahead, which was deemed important due to the adoption oframmingtactic after theBattle of Lissain 1866. But early turrets were very heavy, which necessitated a lowfreeboardto reduce topweight and a corresponding tendency tocapsize.[10][11][12]By the 1870s, designers had shifted to the rotating barbette mount, which eschewed armor protection to reduce weight; this would permit the use of heavy guns in high-freeboard ships. This new type of vessel was referred to as abarbette ship,to differentiate them fromturret shipsandcentral battery ships.[13][14]
In the late 1880s, the BritishRoyal Navyadopted a new mounting that combined the benefits of both kinds of mounts in theMajesticclass.A heavily armoured, rotating gun house was added to the revolving platform, which kept the guns and their crews protected. The gun house was smaller and lighter than the old-style turrets, which still permitted placement higher in the ship and the corresponding benefits to stability and seakeeping. This innovation gradually became known simply as a turret, though the armored tube that held the turret substructure, which included the shell and propellant handling rooms and the ammunition hoists, was still referred to as a barbette. These ships were the prototype of the so-calledpre-dreadnought battleships,which proved to be broadly influential in all major navies over the next fifteen years.[15][16]
Use in bomber aircraft
editWhen applied to military aircraft, largely in aviation history books written by British historians[citation needed],a barbette is a position on anaircraftwhere a gun is in a mounting which has a restricted arc of fire when compared to a turret, or which is remotely mounted away from the gunner. As such it is frequently used to describe thetail gunnerposition on bombers such as theBoeing B-17 Flying Fortress,[17]with American aviation books frequently describing the position as a tail gun turret,[18]or simply as a tail gun.[19]
The term "barbette" is also used by some, again primarily British historians, to describe a remotely aimed and operated gun turret emplacement[20]on almost any non-American military aircraft of World War II, but it isnotusable in a direct translation for the varying German language terms used onLuftwaffeaircraft of that era for such emplacements. As just one example, the GermanHeinkel He 177A heavy bomber had such a remotely operated twin-MG 131 machine gunFernbedienbare DrehlafetteFDL 131Z(Z – "zwilling"/twin) powered forward dorsal gun turret, with the full translation of the German term comprising the prefix as "Remotely controlled rotating gun mount".[21]The term"lafette"in German actually refers to agun carriageof nearly any type, with its original use as being for the mounting design forbombard-style siege guns of the Middle Ages.
Notes
edit- ^Robertson 1754,pp. 619–640.
- ^Hogg, Ian V(1975),Fortress: A History of Military Defence,Macdonald and Jane's,ISBN0-356-08122-2(p. 155)
- ^Wilson 1896, pp. 340–341.
- ^Mahan 1867, p. 45.
- ^Brown 1979, 78.
- ^"The Moncrieff System of Disappearing Gun Carriages, p. 122
- ^Berhow 2015,pp. 201–226.
- ^List of US forts and batteries at CDSG.org
- ^Berhow 2015,p. 176.
- ^Beeler 2001, p. 91
- ^Sondhaus 2001, pp. 79–80
- ^Beeler 1997, p. 114
- ^Beeler 2001, pp. 139–164
- ^Hodges 1981, p. 10
- ^Hodges 1981, p. 33.
- ^Burt 1988, p. 85.
- ^"B-29s Over Britain", p. 573.
- ^Forsyth 2009, p. 32.
- ^Reuter 1999, p. 39.
- ^"Bristol Armament Development", p. 232.
- ^Griehl & Dressel 1998,pp. 243–245.
References
edit- "B-29s Over Britain".Flight:572–574. 19 June 1947.Retrieved25 March2014.
- Beeler, John (2001).Birth of the Battleship: British Capital Ship Design, 1870–1881.London: Chatham.ISBN1-86176-167-8.
- Beeler, John (1997).British Naval Policy in the Gladstone-Disraeli Era, 1866–1880.Stanford University Press.ISBN0-8047-2981-6.
- Berhow, Mark A., ed. (2015).American Seacoast Defenses, A Reference Guide(Third ed.). McLean: CDSG Press.ISBN978-0-9748167-3-9.
- "Bristol Armament Development".Flight:232. 16 February 1950.Retrieved25 March2014.
- Brown, D. K. (1979). Roberts, John (ed.). "Shells at Sevastopol".Warship.III.London: Conway Maritime Press: 74–79.
- Burt, R.A. (1988).British Battleships 1889–1904.Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press.ISBN0-87021-061-0.
- Feron, Luc (1985). "French Battleship Marceau".Warship International.XXII(1). Toledo: International Naval Research Organization: 68–78.ISSN0043-0374.
- Forsyth, Robert (2009).Fw 190 Sturmböcke Vs B-17 Flying Fortress: Europe 1944–45.Oxford: Osprey Publishing.ISBN9781846039416.
- Gardiner, Robert, ed. (1979).Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1860–1905.Greenwich: Conway Maritime Press.ISBN0-8317-0302-4.
- Griehl, Manfred; Dressel, Joachim (1998).Heinkel He 177 - 277 - 274.Shrewsbury: Airlife Publishing.ISBN1-85310-364-0.
- Gröner, Erich (1990).German Warships 1815–1945.Annapolis: Naval Institute Press.ISBN0-87021-790-9.
- Hodges, Peter (1981).The Big Gun: Battleship Main Armament, 1860–1945.Annapolis: Naval Institute Press.ISBN0870219170.
- Mahan, Dennis Hart (1867).An Elementary Course on Military Engineering [covering] Field Fortifications, Military Mining, and Siege Operations.New York: J. Wiley.OCLC3157043.
- Reuter, Claus (1999).Development of Aircraft Turrets in the AAF, 1917–1944.German-Canadian Museum of Applied History.OCLC499763163.
- Robertson, John (1754).The Elements Of Navigation; Containing The Theory and Practice: With All the Necessary Tables: To which is Added, A Treatise of Marine Fortification; For the Use of the Royal Mathematical School at Christ's Hospital, and the Gentlemen of the Navy; In Two Volumes.Nourse. pp. 619–640.
- Sondhaus, Lawrence (2001).Naval Warfare, 1815–1914.London: Routledge.ISBN9780415214780.
- "The Moncrieff System of Disappearing Gun Carriages".The Illustrated Naval and Military Magazine.III.London: W. H. Allen & Co.: 120–124 1886.OCLC220760873.
- Wilson, Herbert Wrigley (1896).Ironclads in Action: A Sketch of Naval Warfare from 1855 to 1895, Volume 1.London: S. Low, Marston and Co.OCLC1111061.
External links
edit- Encyclopædia Britannica.Vol. 3 (11th ed.). 1911. .