Famous for being famousis a term, usually usedpejoratively,for someone who attainscelebritystatus for no clearly identifiable reason (as opposed to fame based onachievement,skill,ortalent) and appears to generate their own fame, or someone who achieves fame through a family or relationship association with an existing celebrity.[1]
History
editThe term originates from an analysis of the media-dominated world calledThe Image: A Guide to Pseudo-events in America(1962), by historian and social theoristDaniel J. Boorstin.[2]In it, he defined the celebrity as "a person who is known for his well-knownness".[3]He further argued that the graphic revolution in journalism and other forms of communication had severed fame from greatness, and that this severance hastened the decay of fame into mere notoriety. Over the years, the phrase has been glossed as "a celebrity is someone who is famous for being famous".[2]
The British journalistMalcolm Muggeridgemay have been the first to use the actual phrase in the introduction to his bookMuggeridge Through The Microphone(1967) in which he wrote:
In the past if someone was famous or notorious, it was for something—as a writer or an actor or a criminal; for some talent or distinction or abomination. Today one is famous for being famous. People who come up to one in the street or in public places to claim recognition nearly always say: "I've seen you on the telly!"[4]
Neal Gablermore recently refined the definition of celebrity to distinguish those who have gained recognition for having done virtually nothing of significance—a phenomenon he dubbed the "Zsa Zsa Factor" in honor ofZsa Zsa Gabor,who parlayed her marriage to actorGeorge Sandersinto a brief movie career and the movie career into a much more enduring celebrity.[5]He goes on to define the celebrity as "human entertainment", by which he means a person who provides entertainment by the very process of living.[5]
This topic is also known in German-speaking countries. Terms like "Schickeria" or "Adabei" characterize the media, which on the one hand are also understood critically but on the other hand are an important editorial topic that electronic quality media do not want to do without today for commercial reasons. People's reporting is fundamentally an important area of journalism that functions according to its own rules, especially in the print medium, and according to journalistNorman Schenzis characterized as "We no longer just write about an event, we tell stories".[6][7][8]
Similar terms
editFamesque
edit
The Washington PostwriterAmy Argetsingercoined the termfamesqueto define actors, singers, or athletes whose fame is mostly (if not entirely) due to one's physical attractiveness and/or personal life, rather than actual talent and (if any) successful career accomplishments. Argetsinger argued, "The famesque of 2009 are descended from that dawn-of-TV creation, the Famous for Being Famous. Turn on a talk show orHollywood Squaresand there'd beZsa Zsa Gabor,Joyce Brothers,Charles Nelson Reilly,so friendly and familiar and—what was it they did again? "She also used actressSienna Milleras a modern-day example; "Miller became famesque by datingJude Law...and then really famesque when he cheated on her with the nanny—to the point that she was the one who madeBalthazar Gettyfamesque (even though he's the one with the hit TV series,Brothers & Sisters) when he reportedly ran off from his wife with her for a while. "[9]
Celebutante
edit
Celebutanteis aportmanteauof the words "celebrity"and"debutante".The male equivalent is sometimes spelledcelebutant.The term has been used to describe heiresses likeParis HiltonandNicole Richieinentertainment journalism.[10]More recently, the term and descriptions similar to the term have been applied to theKardashian-Jenner family.During an interview in 2011 with some of the Kardashians, interviewerBarbara Walterssaid,"You are all often described as 'famous for being famous'. You don't really act, you don’t sing, you don’t dance. You don't have any - forgive me - any talent."[11]Later in 2016,Timedescribed the Kardashian-Jenner family as ubiquitous celebutantes for being the highest earning reality stars.[12]
The term has been traced back to a 1939Walter Winchellsociety column in which he used the word to describe prominent society debutanteBrenda Frazier,who was a traditional "high-society" debutante from a noted family, but whose debut attracted an unprecedented wave of media attention.[10][13]The word appeared again in a 1985Newsweekarticle aboutNew York City's clubland celebrities, focusing on the lifestyles of writerJames St. James,Lisa EdelsteinandDianne Brill,who was crowned "Queen of the Night" byAndy Warhol.[10][14]
See also
edit
References
edit- ^Jenkins, Joe (2002).Contemporary moral issues.Examining Religions (4, illustrated ed.). Heinemann. pp.178.ISBN978-0-435-30309-9.
- ^abRichards, Jeffrey (2007).Sir Henry Irving: A Victorian Actor and His World.Continuum International Publishing Group. p. 259.ISBN978-1-85285-591-8.
- ^Boorstin, Daniel Joseph (1962).The image: A guide to pseudo-events in America.New York: Vintage.ISBN978-0-679-74180-0.
- ^Muggeridge, Malcolm (1967).Muggeridge Through The Microphone.p. 7.
- ^abGabler, Neal."Toward a New Definition of Celebrity"(PDF).The Norman Lear Center.USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism.
- ^„Society-Berichterstattung im Wandel. Wer berichtete denn noch über Promis? “, In: Wiener Zeitung, 28 June 2013.
- ^Franz Kotteder „Schick, schick, Schickeria “In: Süddeutsche Zeitung, 17 May 2010.
- ^Matthias Heine „Nimmt Helmut Dietl die Schickeria mit ins Grab? “, In: Die Welt 31. March 2015.
- ^Argetsinger, Amy (August 10, 2009)."They Must Be Stars Because They Get So Much Press, but What Is It They Do Again?".Washington Post.Archivedfrom the original on April 24, 2010.RetrievedAugust 15,2009.
- ^abcZimmer, Ben (January 20, 2007)."Celeb-u-rama".Language Log.Archivedfrom the original on November 12, 2011.RetrievedSeptember 24,2011.
- ^Ott, Veronica (November 26, 2020)."KUWTK: Barbara Walters' 'No Talent' Jab At Kardashians Goes Viral on Vine".Screen Rant.RetrievedAugust 2,2022.
- ^Lang, Cady (November 16, 2016)."The Kardashian-Jenners Are Officially the Highest-Earning Reality Stars".Time.RetrievedAugust 2,2022.
- ^Winchell, Walter (April 7, 1939). "On Broadway (syndicated column)".Daily Times-News.
- ^"James St. James profile".Newsweek.June 3, 1985.