Wikipedia

Chindians

(Redirected fromChindian)
This article is about people of Chinese and Indian descent. For the geopolitical term, seeChindia.

Chindian(Hindi:चीनी-भारतीय;Chinese:Trung ấn người;pinyin:Zhōngyìnrén;Cantonese Yale:Jūngyanyàn;Tamil:சிந்தியன்;Telugu:చిండియన్స్); is an informal term used to refer to a person of mixedChineseandIndianancestry; i.e. from any of the host of ethnic groups native to modernChinaandIndia.There are a considerable number of Chindians inMalaysiaandSingapore.In Maritime Southeast Asia, people of Chinese and Indian origin immigrated in large numbers during the 19th and 20th centuries.[1]There are also a sizeable number living inHong Kongand smaller numbers in other countries with largeoverseas ChineseandIndian diaspora,such asJamaica,Trinidad and Tobago,SurinameandGuyanain theCaribbean,as well as inIndonesia,thePhilippines,theUnited States,Canada,United Kingdom,Australia,andNew Zealand.

People of Chinese and Indian origins
Regions with significant populations
Languages
Otherlanguages of Indiaand otherlanguages of China
Religion
Related ethnic groups

Countries

edit

China

edit
Main article:Indians in China

Zhang Qian(d. 113 BC) andSima Qian(145–90 BC) make likely references to "Shendu( "Sindhu" inSanskrit), and duringYunnan's annexation by theHan dynastyin the first century an Indian "Shendu" community was living there.[2]Duringtransmission of Buddhism from India to Chinafrom the first century onwards, many Indian scholars and monks travelled to China, such asBatuo(fl.464–495 AD)—founder of theShaolin Monastery—andBodhidharma—founder ofChan/ZenBuddhism and there was also a large Indian trader community inQuanzhou CityandJin gian g districtwho built more than a dozen Hindu temples or shrines, including two grand big temples in Quanzhou city.[3]Duringcolonial era,Indians were among the crew of the Portuguese ships trading on the Chinese coast beginning in the sixteenth century[4]and Indians fromPortuguese Indian Colonies(notablyGoa) settled inMacauin small numbers.

There are around 45,000–48,000 Indian nationals/expatriates living in mainland China as of 2015,[5]most of whom are students, traders and professionals employed with Indian IT companies and banks. There are three Indian community associations in the country.[6]

Hong Kong

edit

Indians have been living in Hong Konglong before thepartition of Indiainto the nations ofIndiaandPakistan.They migrated toHong Kongas traders, police officers and army officers duringcolonial rule.

2,700 Indian troops in Hong Kong arrived withBritish occupationon 26 January 1841,[7]who later played an important role in setting up of theUniversity of Hong Kong(HKU)[8]and theHong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation(HSBC).[9]25,000 of theMuslims in Hong Kongtrace their roots back to what is now Pakistan. Around half of them belong to 'local boy' families, Muslims of mixed Chinese (Tanka) and Indian/Pakistani ancestry, descended from early Indian/Pakistani male immigrants who took local Chinese wives and brought their children up as Muslims.[10][11]These "local Indians" were not completely accepted by either the Chinese or Indian communities.[12]

India

edit
See also:Chinese Indians

There aretiny communities of Chinese who migrated to Indiaduring theBritish Rajand became naturalised citizens of India and there are 189,000 estimated total ethnic Chinese of Chindian or full Chinese ancestry.[13]The community living inKolkatanumbers around 4,000 and 400 families inMumbai,where there are Chinatowns.[13][14][15][16]Chinese Indians also contributed to the development of fusionIndian Chinese cuisine(Chindian cuisine),[17]which is now an integral part of the Indian culinary scene.[18]

There are an estimated 5,000–7,000 Chinese expatriates living in India as of 2015, having doubled in number in recent years.[19]Most work on 2 to 3 year contracts for the growing number of Chinese brands and companies doing business in India.[19]

British India

edit

During theBritish Raj,some Chinese "convicts"[clarification needed]deported from theStraits Settlementswere sent to be jailed inMadrasin India. The "Madras district gazetteers, Volume 1" reported an incident where the Chinese convicts escaped and killed the police sent to apprehend them: "Much of the building work was done by Chinese convicts sent to the Madras jails from the Straits Settlements (where there was no sufficient prison accommodation) and more than once these people escaped from the temporary buildings' in which they were confined at Lovedale. In 186^ seven of them got away and it was several days before they were apprehended by the Tahsildar, aided by Badagas sent out in all directions to search. On 28 July in the following year twelve others broke out during a very stormy night and parties of armed police were sent out to scour the hills for them. They were at last arrested in Malabar a fortnight later. Some police weapons were found in their possession and one of the parties of police had disappeared—an ominous coincidence. Search was made all over the country for the party and at length, on 15 September, their four bodies were found lying in the jungle at Walaghát, half way down the Sispára ghát path, neatly laid out in a row with their severed heads carefully placed on their shoulders. It turned out that the wily Chinamen, on being overtaken, had at first pretended to surrender and had then suddenly attacked the police and killed them with their own weapons."[20][21][22]Other Chinese convicts in Madras who were released from jail then settled in theNilgiri mountainsnearNaduvattamand marriedTamilParaiyanwomen, having mixed Chinese-Tamil children with them. They were documented byEdgar Thurston.[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]Paraiyan is also anglicised as "pariah".

Edgar Thurston described the colony of the Chinese men with their Tamil pariah wives and children: "Halting in the course of a recent anthropological expedition on the western side of the Nilgiri plateau, in the midst of the Government Cinchona plantations, I came across a small settlement of Chinese, who have squatted for some years on the slopes of the hills between Naduvatam and Gudalur and developed, as the result of ' marriage ' with Tamil pariah women, into a colony, earning an honest livelihood by growing vegetables, cultivating coffee on a small scale and adding to their income from these sources by the economic products of the cow. An ambassador was sent to this miniature Chinese Court with a suggestion that the men should, in return for monies, present themselves before me with a view to their measurements being recorded. The reply which came back was in its way racially characteristic as between Hindus and Chinese. In the case of the former, permission to make use of their bodies for the purposes of research depends essentially on a pecuniary transaction, on a scale varying from two to eight annas. The Chinese, on the other hand, though poor, sent a courteous message to the effect that they did not require payment in money, but would be perfectly happy if I would give them, as a memento, copies of their photographs."[34][35]Thurston further describe a specific family: "The father was a typical Chinaman, whose only grievance was that, in the process of conversion to Christianity, he had been obliged to 'cut him tail off.' The mother was a typical Tamil Pariah of dusky hue. The colour of the children was more closely allied to the yellowish tint of the father than to the dark tint of the mother and the semimongol parentage was betrayed in the slant eyes, flat nose and (in one case) conspicuously prominent cheek-bones."[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]Thurston's description of the Chinese-Tamil families were cited by others, one mentioned "an instance mating between a Chinese male with a Tamil Pariah female"[45][46][47][48][49]A 1959 book described attempts made to find out what happened to the colony of mixed Chinese and Tamils.[50]

According to Alabaster there were lard manufacturers and shoemakers in addition to carpenters. Running tanneries and working withleatherwas traditionally not considered a respectable profession among casteHindusand work was relegated to lower castemuchisandchamars.There was a high demand, however, for high quality leather goods incolonial India,one that the Chinese were able to fulfill. Alabaster also mentions licensedopium densrun by native Chinese and aCheena Bazaarwhere contraband was readily available. Opium, however, was not illegal until after India's Independence from Great Britain in 1947. Immigration continued unabated through the turn of the century and duringWorld War Ipartly due to political upheavals in China such as theFirstandSecond Opium Wars,First Sino-Japanese Warand theBoxer Rebellion.Around the time of the First World War, the first Chinese-owned tanneries sprang up.[51]

InAssam,local Assamese women married Chinese migrants during British colonial times. It later became hard to physically differentiate Chinese in Assam from locals during the time of their internment during the 1962 war, as the majority of these Chinese in Assam were mixed.[52]

Singapore

edit

In Singapore, the majority of interracial marriages occur between Chinese women and Indian men. Thegovernment of Singaporeclassifies them as their father's ethnicity. According to government statistics, 2.4% of Singapore's population aremultiracial,mostly Chindians. The highest number of interethnic marriages was in 2007, when 16.4% of the 20,000 marriages in Singapore were interethnic, again mostly between Chinese and Indians.[1]Singapore only began to allow mixed-race persons to register two racial classifications on theiridentity cardsin 2010. Parents may choose which of the two is listed first.[53]More than two races may not be listed even if the person has several different ethnicities in their ancestry. Like in Malaysia, most Chindians in Singapore are offspring of interracial relationships between Indian males and Chinese females.[54]

Malaysia

edit

In Malaysia, the majority ofinterracial marriagesoccur between Chinese and Indians. The offspring of such marriages are informally known as "Chindian". TheMalaysian government,however, considers them to be an unclassified ethnicity, using the father's ethnicity as the informal term. As the majority of these intermarriages usually involve an Indian male and Chinese female, the majority of Chindian offspring in Malaysia are usually classified as "Malaysian Indian"by the Malaysian government.[54]

Guyana

edit

In Guyana, Chinese men married Indian women due to the lack of Chinese women in the early days of settlement.[55]Creolesexual relationships and marriages with Chinese and Indians were rare,[56]however it has become more common for Indian women and Chinese men to establish sexual relations with each other and some Chinese men took their Indian wives back with them to China.[57]Indian women and children were brought alongside Indian men ascoolieswhile Chinese men made up 99% of Chinese coolies.[58]

The contrast with the female to male ratio among Indian and Chinese immigrants has been compared by historians.[59]

In Guyana, while marriages between Indian women and black African men is socially shameful to Indians, Chinese-Indian marriages are considered acceptable as reported by Joseph Nevadomsky in 1983.[60]"Chiney-dougla" is the Indian Guyanese term for mixed Chinese-Indian children.[61]Some Indian women in Guiana had multiple partners due to the greater number of men than women, an account of the era told by women in British Guiana is of a single Chinese man who was allowed to temporarily borrow a Hindu Indian woman by her Indian husband who was his friend, so the Chinese man could sire a child with her, after a son was born to her the Chinese man kept the boy while she was returned to her Indian husband, the boy was named William Adrian Lee.[62][63]An Indian woman named Mary See married a Chinese man surnamed Wu in Goedverwagting and founded their own family after he learned how to process sugar cane.[64]

In British Guiana, the Chinese did not maintain their distinctive physical features due to the high rate of Chinese men marrying people other ethnicities like Indian women.[65][66][67]The severe imbalance with Indian men outnumbering Indian women led some women to take advantage of the situation to squeeze favors from men and leave their partners for other men,[68]one infamous example was a pretty, light skinned, Christian Indian woman named Mary Ilandun with ancestral origins fromMadras,born in 1846, who had sex with Indian, black, and Chinese men as she married them in succession and ran off with their money to her next paramour, doing this from 1868 to 1884.[69]Indian men used force to bring Indian women back in line from this kind of behavior.[70]The most severe lack of women in all the peoples of British Guiana was with the Chinese and this led Europeans to believe that Chinese did not engage in wife murders while wife murders was something innate to Indian men, and unlike Indian coolie women, Chinese women were viewed as chaste.[71]Chinese women were not indentured and since they did not need to work, they avoided prospective men seeking relationships, while the character of Indian women was disparaged as immoral and their alleged sexual looseness was blamed for their deaths in the "wife murders" by Indian men.[72]The sex ratio of Indian men to Indian women was 100:63 while the sex ratio of Chinese men to Chinese women was 100:43 in British Guiana in 1891.[73]

In British Guiana there was growth of coolie Indian women marriages with Chinese men and it was reported that "It is not an uncommon thing to find a cooly woman living with a Chinaman as his wife, and in one or two instances the woman has accompanied her reputed husband to China." by Dr. Comins in 1891 and an 1892 Immigration British Guiana authorities took note of marriages between Indian women and Chinese men that year.[74][75]

Jamaica

edit

When black andIndian womenhad children withChinese menthechildrenwere called chaina raial in Jamaican English.[76]The Chinese community in Jamaica was able to consolidate because an openness to marrying Indian women was present in the Chinese since Chinese women were in short supply.[77]Women sharing was less common among Indians in Jamaica according toVerene A. Shepherd.[78]The small number of Indian women were fought over between Indian men and led to a rise in the amount of wife murders by Indian men.[79]Indian women made up 11 percent of the annual amount of Indian indentured migrants from 1845 to 1847 in Jamaica.[80]

Mauritius

edit

In the late 19th to early 20th century,Chinese men in MauritiusmarriedIndianwomen due to both a lack of Chinese women and higher numbers of Indian women on the island.[81][82]At first the prospect of relations with Indian women was unappealing to the original all male Chinese migrants yet they eventually had to establish sexual unions with Indian women since there were no Chinese women coming.[83]The 1921 census in Mauritius counted that Indian women there had a total of 148 children sired by Chinese men.[84][85]These Chinese were mostly traders.[86]Colonialist stereotypes in the sugar colonies of Indians emerged such as "the degraded coolie woman" and the "coolie wife beater", due to Indian women being murdered by their husbands after they ran away to other richer men since the ratio of Indian women to men was low.[87]It was much more common for Chinese and Indians to intermarry than within their own group. Intermarriage between people of between different Chinese and Indian language groups is rare; it is so rare that the cases of intermarriage between Cantonese and Hakka can be individually named. Similarly, intermarriage between Hakka Chinese and Indians hardly occurs.[88]

Trinidad

edit

The situation in Trinidad and British Guiana with Indian women being fewer than Indian men led to Indian women using the situation to their advantage by leaving their partners for other men, leading to a high incidence of "wife murders" by Indian men on their wives, and Indian women and culture were branded as "immoral" by European observers, an Indian Muslim man named Mohammad Orfy petitioned as a representative of "destitute Indian men of Trinidad", to the colonial authorities, complaining of Indian women's behavior and claiming that it was "a perforating plague...the high percentage of immoral lives led by the female section of our community...to satisfy the greed and lust of the male section of quite a different race to theirs...[Indian women] are enticed, seduced and frightened into becoming concubines, and paramours...[Indian women] have absolutely no knowledge whatsoever of the value of being in virginhood...most shameless and a perfect menace to the Indian gentry." with him naming specific peoples, claiming that Indian women were having sex with Chinese men, Americans, Africans, and Europeans,[89][90][91][92][93]saying "Africans, Americans and Chinese in goodly numbers are enticing the females of India, who are more or less subtle to lustful traps augured through some fear of punishment being meted out if not readily submissive as requested."[94][95][96]

The situation on Trinidad enabled unprecedented autonomy in the sexual activities of Hindu and Muslim Indian women and freedom.[97]The 1916 "Peition of Indentured Labourers in Trinidad" complained that: "Is it permissible for a male member of the Christian faith to keep a Hindoo or Muslim female as his paramour or concubine? Is this not an act of sacrilege and a disgraceful scandal according to the Christian faith to entice and encourage Indian females to lead immoral lives?"[97]

On plantations white European managers took advantage of and use indentured Indian woman for sex,[98]in addition, English, Portuguese, and Chinese men were also in sexual relationships with Indian women as noted by Attorney General W.F. Haynes Smith, while Creole women were abhorred or ignored by Indian men.[99][100]Approval of interracial marriage has increased in Trinidad and Tobago and one Chinese man reported that his Indian wife did not encounter any rejection from his parents when asked in a survey.[101]In Trinidad Europeans and Chinese are seen as acceptable marriage partners for Indian women by Indian families while marrying black men would lead to rejection of their daughters by Indian families.[102]

Notable people

edit

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^abSheela Narayanan (17 October 2008)."Go ahead, call me Chindian".AsiaOne.Archived fromthe originalon 21 August 2009.
  2. ^Tan Chung (1998).A Sino-Indian Perspective for India-China Understanding.Archived2007-06-06 at theWayback Machine
  3. ^Krishnan, Ananth (19 July 2013)."Behind China's Hindu temples, a forgotten history".The Hindu– via thehindu.
  4. ^Boxer, Charles Ralph;Pereira, Galeote; Cruz, Gaspar da; Rada, Martín de (1953),South China in the sixteenth century: being the narratives of Galeote Pereira, Fr. Gaspar da Cruz, O.P. [and] Fr. Martín de Rada, O.E.S.A. (1550–1575),Issue 106 of Works issued by the Hakluyt Society, Printed for the Hakluyt Society, p. 37
  5. ^"India and China need a push to encourage more people to live across the borde".The Economic Times.12 May 2015.
  6. ^"India Times – India is hot in China".Archived fromthe originalon 24 June 2010.Retrieved11 October2019.
  7. ^Kwok S. T., Narain, K. (2003).Co-Prosperity in Cross-Culturalism: Indians in Hong Kong.P.18
  8. ^Kwok S. T., Narain, K. (2003).Co-Prosperity in Cross-Culturalism: Indians in Hong Kong.P.32
  9. ^Kwok S. T., Narain, K. (2003).Co-Prosperity in Cross-Culturalism: Indians in Hong Kong.P.22
  10. ^Weiss, Anita M. (July 1991), "South Asian Muslims in Hong Kong: Creation of a 'Local Boy' Identity",Modern Asian Studies,25(3): 417–53,doi:10.1017/S0026749X00013895,S2CID145350669.
  11. ^Ina Baghdiantz McCabe, Gelina Harlaftis, Iōanna Pepelasē Minoglou (2005),Diaspora Entrepreneurial Networks: Four Centuries of History,Berg Publishers,p. 256,ISBN1-85973-880-X{{citation}}:CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  12. ^Carol R. Ember, Melvin Ember, Ian A. Skoggard (2004),Encyclopedia of Diasporas: Immigrant and Refugee Cultures Around the World,Springer,p. 511,ISBN0-306-48321-1
  13. ^ab":: OVERSEAS COMPATRIOT AFFAIRS COMMISSION, R.O.C.::".4 January 2011. Archived fromthe originalon 4 January 2011.
  14. ^Krishnan, Murali (17 October 2013)."India's dwindling Chinatown".Deutsche Welle.
  15. ^Someshwar, Savera R (23 January 2007)."Happy Indian Chinese New Year".Rediff.
  16. ^"Mumbai's 3rd generation Chinese eye global jobs, learn Mandarin".TOI. 3 November 2015.
  17. ^Sankar, Amal (December 2017)."Creation of Indian–Chinese cuisine: Chinese food in an Indian city".Journal of Ethnic Foods.4(4): 268–273.doi:10.1016/j.jef.2017.10.002.
  18. ^Sanjeev Kapoor (2007).Chinese Cooking ( Non-Veg).Popular Prakashan. p. 7.ISBN978-81-7991-310-9.
  19. ^ab"Why India remains a difficult terrain for 7,000 Chinese expatriates living in the country".The Economic Times.28 August 2015.
  20. ^Madras (India: Presidency), Madras (India: State) (1908).Madras district gazetteers, Volume 1.MADRAS: Printed by the Superintendent, Government Press. p. 263.Mr. Chisholm was the architect of the new buildings. The CHAP. X. boys' part is designed in the Italian Gothic style, and is a two- Educational storeyed construction forming three sides of a quadrangle Institutions. a feature of which is the campanile, 130 feet in height. The girls were at first placed in the building intended for the hospital. * Much of the building work was done by Chinese convicts sent to the Madras jails from the Straits Settlements (where there was no sufficient prison accommodation) and more than once these people escaped from the temporary buildings' in which they were confined at Lovedale. In 186^ seven of them got away and it was several days before they were apprehended by the Tahsildar, aided by Badagas sent out in all directions to search. On 28 July in the following year twelve others broke out during a very stormy night and parties of armed police were sent out to scour the hills for them. They were at last arrested in Malabar a fortnight later. Some police weapons were found in their possession, and one of the parties of police had disappeared—an ominous coincidence. Search was made all over the country for the party and at length, on 15 September, their four bodies were found lying in the jungle at Walaghat, half way down the Sisp^ra'gha't path, neatly laid out in a row with their severed heads carefully placed on their shoulders. It turned out that the wily Chinamen, on being overtaken, had at first pretended to surrender and had then suddenly attacked the police and killed them with their own weapons. In 1884 the benefits of the Lawrence Asylum were extended by the admission to it of the orphan children of Volunteers who had served in the Presidency for seven years and upwards, it being however expressly provided that children of British soldiers were not to be superseded or excluded by this concession. In 1899 the standard of instruction in the Asylum was raised to the upper secondary grade. In 1901 the rules of the institution, which had been twice altered since 1864 to meet the changes which had occurred, were again revised and considerably modified. They are printed in full in the annual reports. In 1903 owing to the South Indian Railway requiring for its new terminus at Egmore the buildings then occupied by the Civil Orphan Asylums of Madras, Government suggested that these should be moved to the premises on the Poonamallee Road in which the Military Female Orphan Asylum was established and that the girls in the latter, who numbered about 100, should be transferred to the Lawrsnce Asylum. The transfer was
  21. ^W. Francis (1994).The Nilgiris.Vol. 1 of Madras district gazetteers (reprint ed.). Asian Educational Services. p. 263.ISBN81-206-0546-2.
  22. ^The Nilgiris.Concept Publishing Company. 1984. p. 26.
  23. ^Sarat Chandra Roy (Rai Bahadur), ed. (1959).Man in India, Volume 39.A. K. Bose. p. 309.TAMIL-CHINESE CROSSES IN THE NILGIRIS, MADRAS. S. S. Sarkar* (Received on 21 September 1959) DURING May 1959, while working on the blood groups of the Kotas of the Nilgiri Hills in the village of Kokal in Gudalur, inquiries were made regarding the present position of the Tamil-Chinese cross described by Thurston (1909). It may be recalled here that Thurston reported the above cross resulting from the union of some Chinese convicts, deported from the Straits Settlement, and local Tamil Paraiyan
  24. ^Edgar Thurston; K. Rangachari (1909).Castes and tribes of southern India, Volume 2.Government press. p. 99.99 CHINESE-TAMIL CROSS in the Nilgiri jail. It is recorded * that, in 1868, twelve of the Chinamen "broke out during a very stormy night, and parties of armed police were sent out to scour the hills for them. They were at last arrested in Malabar a fortnightAlt URLArchived18 May 2014 at theWayback Machine
  25. ^Edgar Thurston (2011).The Madras Presidency with Mysore, Coorg and the Associated States(reissue ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 218.ISBN978-1107600683.
  26. ^RADHAKRISHNAN, D. (19 April 2014)."Unravelling Chinese link can boost Nilgiris tourism".The Hindu.Archived fromthe originalon 19 April 2014.Alt URL
  27. ^"Unravelling Chinese link can boost Nilgiris tourism".Archived fromthe originalon 18 May 2014.Retrieved18 May2014.
  28. ^Raman, A (16 May 2012)."Chinese in Madras".The New Indian Express.Archived fromthe originalon 18 May 2014.
  29. ^Raman, A (16 May 2012)."Quinine factory and Malay-Chinese workers".The New Indian Express.Archived fromthe originalon 18 May 2014.
  30. ^"Chinese connection to the Nilgiris to help promote tourism potential".travel News Digest.2013.
  31. ^W. Francis (1908).The Nilgiris.Vol. 1 of Madras District Gazetteers (reprint ed.). Logos Press. p. 184.ISBN9780865903777.Alt URL
  32. ^Madras (India: State) (1908).Madras District Gazetteers, Volume 1.Superintendent, Government Press. p. 184.
  33. ^W. Francis (1908).The Nilgiris.Concept Publishing Company. p. 184.
  34. ^Government Museum (Madras, India) (1897).Bulletin..., Volumes 2–3.MADRAS: Printed by the Superintendent, Govt. Press. p. 31.ON A CHINESE-TAMIL CKOSS. Halting in the course of a recent anthropological expedition on the western side of the Nilgiri plateau, in the midst of the Government Cinchona plantations, I came across a small settlement of Chinese, who have squatted for some years on the slopes of the hills between Naduvatam and Gudalur, and developed, as the result of 'marriage' with Tamil pariah women, into a colony, earning an honest livelihood by growing vegetables, cultivating cofl'ce on a small scale, and adding to their income from these sources by the economic products of the cow. An ambassador was sent to this miniature Chinese Court with a suggestion that the men should, in return for monies, present themselves before me with a view to their measurements being recorded. The reply which came back was in its way racially characteristic as between Hindus and Chinese. In the case of the former, permission to make use of their bodies for the purposes of research depends essentially on a pecuniary transaction, on a scale varying from two to eight annas. The Chinese, on the other hand, though poor, sent a courteous message to the effect that they did not require payment in money, but would be perfectly happy if I would give them, as a memento, copies of their photographs. The measurements of a single family, excepting a widowed daughter whom I was not permitted to see, and an infant in arms, who was pacified with cake while I investigated its mother, are recorded in the following table:
  35. ^Edgar Thurston (2004).Badagas and Irulas of Nilgiris, Paniyans of Malabar: A Cheruman Skull, Kuruba Or Kurumba – Summary of Results.Vol. 2, Issue 1 of Bulletin (Government Museum (Madras, India)). Asian Educational Services. p. 31.ISBN81-206-1857-2.
  36. ^Government Museum (Madras, India) (1897).Bulletin..., Volumes 2–3.MADRAS: Printed by the Superintendent, Govt. Press. p. 32.The father was a typical Chinaman, whose only grievance was that, in the process of conversion to Christianity, he had been obliged to 'cut him tail off.' The mother was a typical Tamil Pariah of dusky hue. The colour of the children was more closely allied to the yellowish tint of the father than to the dark tint of the mother; and the semimongol parentage was betrayed in the slant eyes, flat nose, and (in one case) conspicuously prominent cheek-bones. To have recorded the entire series of measurements of the children would have been useless for the purpose of comparison with those of the parents, and I selected from my repertoire the length and breadth of the head and nose, which plainly indicate the paternal influence on the external anatomy of the offspring. The figures given in the table bring out very clearly the great breadth, as compared with the length of the heads of all the children, and the resultant high cephalic index. In other words, in one case a mesaticephalic (79), and, in the remaining three cases, a sub-brachycephalic head (80 "1; 801; 82-4) has resulted from the union of a mesaticephalic Chinaman (78–5) with a sub-dolichocephalic Tamil Pariah (76" 8). How great is the breadth of the head in the children may be emphasised by noting that the average head-breadth of the adult Tamil Pariah man is only 13 "7 cm., whereas that of the three boys, aged ten, nine, and five only, was 14 3, 14, and 13" 7 cm. respectively. Quite as strongly marked is the effect of paternal influence on the character of the nose; the nasal index, in the case of each child (68 "1; 717; 727; 68'3), bearing a much closer relation to that of the long nosed father (71'7) than to the typical Pariah nasal index of the broadnosed mother (78–7). It will be interesting to note, hereafter, what is the future of the younger members of this quaint little colony, and to observe the physical characters, temperament, improvement or deterioration, fecundity, and other points relating to the cross-breed resulting from the union of Chinese and Tamil.
  37. ^Edgar Thurston (2004).Badagas and Irulas of Nilgiris, Paniyans of Malabar: A Cheruman Skull, Kuruba Or Kurumba – Summary of Results.Vol. 2, Issue 1 of Bulletin (Government Museum (Madras, India)). Asian Educational Services. p. 32.ISBN81-206-1857-2.
  38. ^Edgar Thurston; K. Rangachari (1987).Castes and Tribes of Southern India(illustrated ed.). Asian Educational Services. p. 99.ISBN81-206-0288-9.The father was a typical Chinaman, whose only grievance was that, in the process of conversion to Christianity, he had been obliged to "cut him tail off." The mother was a typical dark-skinned Tamil paraiyan,
  39. ^Edgar Thurston; K. Rangachari (1987).Castes and Tribes of Southern India(illustrated ed.). Asian Educational Services. p. 98.ISBN81-206-0288-9.
  40. ^Edgar Thurston; K. Rangachari (1987).Castes and Tribes of Southern India(illustrated ed.). Asian Educational Services. p. 99.ISBN978-81-206-0288-5.
  41. ^Government Museum (Madras, India), Edgar Thurston (1897).Note on tours along the Malabar coast.Vol. 2–3 of Bulletin, Government Museum (Madras, India). Superintendent, Government Press. p. 31.{{cite book}}:CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  42. ^Government Museum (Madras, India) (1894).Bulletin, Volumes 1–2.Superintendent, Government Press. p. 31.
  43. ^Government Museum (Madras, India) (1894).Bulletin.Vol. v. 2 1897–99. Madras: Printed by the Superintendent, Govt. Press. p. 31.
  44. ^Madras Government Museum Bulletin.Vol. II. Madras. 1897. p. 31. Archived fromthe originalon 24 September 2015.Retrieved18 May2014.{{cite book}}:CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  45. ^Sarat Chandra Roy (Rai Bahadur) (1954).Man in India, Volume 34, Issue 4.A.K. Bose. p. 273.Thurston found the Chinese element to be predominant among the offspring as will be evident from his description. 'The mother was a typical dark-skinned Tamil Paraiyan. The colour of the children was more closely allied to the yellowish
  46. ^Mahadeb Prasad Basu (1990).An anthropological study of bodily height of Indian population.Punthi Pustak. p. 84.ISBN9788185094335.Sarkar (1959) published a pedigree showing Tamil-Chinese-English crosses in a place located in the Nilgiris. Thurston (1909) mentioned an instance of a mating between a Chinese male with a Tamil Pariah female. Man (Deka 1954) described
  47. ^Man in India, Volumes 34–35.A. K. Bose. 1954. p. 272.(c) Tamil (female) and African (male) (Thurston 1909). (d) Tamil Pariah (female) and Chinese (male) (Thuston, 1909). (e) Andamanese (female) and UP Brahmin (male ) (Portman 1899). (f) Andamanese (female) and Hindu (male) (Man, 1883).
  48. ^Sarat Chandra Roy (Rai Bahadur) (1954).Man in India, Volume 34, Issue 4.A.K. Bose. p. 272.(c) Tamil (female) and African (male) (Thurston 1909). (d) Tamil Pariah (female) and Chinese (male) (Thuston, 1909). (e) Andamanese (female) and UP Brahmin (male ) (Portman 1899). (f) Andamanese (female) and Hindu (male) (Man, 1883).
  49. ^Edgar Thurston; K. Rangachari (1987).Castes and Tribes of Southern India(illustrated ed.). Asian Educational Services. p. 100.ISBN81-206-0288-9.the remaining three cases, a sub-brachycephalic head (80-1; 80-1; 82-4) has resulted from the union of a mesaticephalic Chinaman (78•5) with a sub-dolichocephalic Tamil Paraiyan (76-8).
  50. ^Sarat Chandra Roy (Rai Bahadur), ed. (1959).Man in India, Volume 39.A. K. Bose. p. 309.d: TAMIL-CHINESE CROSSES IN THE NILGIRIS, MADRAS. S. S. Sarkar* ( Received on 21 September 1959 ) iURING May 1959, while working on the blood groups of the Kotas of the Nilgiri Hills in the village of Kokal in Gudalur, enquiries were made regarding the present position of the Tamil-Chinese cross described by Thurston (1909). It may be recalled here that Thurston reported the above cross resulting from the union of some Chinese convicts, deported from the Straits Settlement, and local Tamil Paraiyan
  51. ^Haraprasad, Ray (2012)."Chinese, The".InIslam, Sirajul;Jamal, Ahmed A. (eds.).Banglapedia: National Encyclopedia of Bangladesh(Second ed.).Asiatic Society of Bangladesh.
  52. ^CHOWDHURY, RITA (18 November 2012)."The Assamese Chinese story".The Hindu.
  53. ^Hoe, Yeen Nie (12 January 2010),Singaporeans of mixed race allowed to 'double barrel' race in IC,Channel NewsAsia, archived fromthe originalon 6 February 2010,retrieved10 June2010
  54. ^abDaniels, Timothy P. (2005),Building Cultural Nationalism in Malaysia,Routledge,p. 189,ISBN0-415-94971-8
  55. ^Brian L. Moore (1995).Cultural Power, Resistance, and Pluralism: Colonial Guyana, 1838–1900.Vol. 22 of McGill-Queen's studies in ethnic history (illustrated ed.). McGill-Queen's Press – MQUP. pp. 272–273.ISBN077351354X.ISSN0846-8869.
  56. ^Brian L. Moore (1987).Race, Power, and Social Segmentation in Colonial Society: Guyana After Slavery, 1838–1891.Vol. 4 of Caribbean studies (illustrated ed.). Gordon & Breach Science Publishers. p. 181.ISBN0677219806.ISSN0275-5793.
  57. ^Brian L. Moore (1987).Race, Power, and Social Segmentation in Colonial Society: Guyana After Slavery, 1838–1891.Vol. 4 of Caribbean studies (illustrated ed.). Gordon & Breach Science Publishers. p. 182.ISBN0677219806.ISSN0275-5793.
  58. ^Lisa Yun (2008).The Coolie Speaks: Chinese Indentured Laborers and African Slaves in Cuba.Temple University Press. p.8.ISBN978-1592135837.indian coolie woman chinese men.
  59. ^Walton Look Lai (1993).Indentured labor, Caribbean sugar: Chinese and Indian migrants to the British West Indies, 1838–1918.Johns Hopkins studies in Atlantic history and culture (illustrated ed.). Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 46.ISBN0801844657.
  60. ^Preethy Sarah Samuel (2000).Cultural Continuity Or Assimilation in the Familial Domain of the Indo-Guyanese.Wayne State University. Sociology (illustrated ed.). p. 38.ISBN978-0-549-38762-6.Retrieved1 June2006.[permanent dead link‍]
  61. ^JCAS Symposium Series, Issue 13.Kokuritsu Minzokugaku Hakubutsukan. Chiiki Kenkyu Kikaku Koryu Senta (illustrated ed.). Japan Center for Area Studies, National Museum of Ethnology. 2002. p. 209.Retrieved1 June2006.{{cite book}}:CS1 maint: others (link)Alt URL
  62. ^Gaiutra Bahadur (2013).Coolie Woman: The Odyssey of Indenture.University of Chicago Press. p. 119.ISBN978-0-226-04338-8.Retrieved1 June2006.
  63. ^Margery Kirkpatrick (1993).From the Middle Kingdom to the New World: Aspects of the Chinese Experience in Migration to British Guiana, Volume 1.Vol. 1 of From the Middle Kingdom to the New World. M. Kirkpatrick. p. 156.ISBN978-976-8136-27-5.Retrieved1 June2006.
  64. ^Margery Kirkpatrick (1993).From the Middle Kingdom to the New World: Aspects of the Chinese Experience in Migration to British Guiana, Volume 1.Vol. 1 of From the Middle Kingdom to the New World. M. Kirkpatrick. p. 128.ISBN978-976-8136-27-5.Retrieved1 June2006.
  65. ^L. Liang-chi Wang; Gungwu Wang, eds. (1998).The Chinese Diaspora: Selected Essays, Volume 2.Vol. 2 of The Chinese Diaspora (illustrated ed.). Times Academic Press. p. 108.ISBN978-981-210-093-1.Retrieved1 June2006.
  66. ^Tim Merrill, ed. (1993)."Guyana and Belize: Country Studies".Belarus and Moldova: Country Studies.550(82). Library of Congress. Federal Research Division (2 ed.). Federal Research Division, Library of Congress: 42.ISBN978-0-8444-0778-4.ISSN1057-5294.Retrieved1 June2006.
  67. ^Jenny Pettit; Caroline Starbird (2000).Contemporary Issues in South America.University of Denver, CTIR. p. 48.ISBN978-0-943804-90-3.Retrieved1 June2006.
  68. ^"How much was immigrant culture affected by the realities of life in Guyana and the norms of other racial groups present in Guyana between 1838 and 1905?".flax.British Academic Written English (Arts and Humanities).
  69. ^Brian L. Moore (1995)."Cultural Power, Resistance, and Pluralism: Colonial Guyana, 1838–1900".Mcgill-Queen's Studies in Ethnic History.22 of McGill-Queen's studies in ethnic history (illustrated ed.). McGill-Queen's Press – MQUP: 169–171.ISBN978-0-7735-1354-9.ISSN0846-8869.Retrieved1 June2015.
  70. ^Guyana Historical Journal, Volumes 1–5.University of Guyana. History Society, University of Guyana. Department of History. University of Guyana, Department of History. 1989. p. 9.Retrieved1 June2015.{{cite book}}:CS1 maint: others (link)
  71. ^Gaiutra Bahadur (2013).Coolie Woman: The Odyssey of Indenture.University of Chicago Press. p. 116.ISBN978-0-226-04338-8.Retrieved1 June2015.
  72. ^Gaiutra Bahadur (2013).Coolie Woman: The Odyssey of Indenture.University of Chicago Press. pp. 117–118.ISBN978-0-226-04338-8.Retrieved1 June2015.
  73. ^Gaiutra Bahadur (2013).Coolie Woman: The Odyssey of Indenture.University of Chicago Press. p. 234.ISBN978-0-226-04338-8.Retrieved1 June2015.
  74. ^Walton Look Lai (1993).Indentured labor, Caribbean sugar: Chinese and Indian migrants to the British West Indies, 1838–1918.Johns Hopkins studies in Atlantic history and culture (illustrated ed.). Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 210.ISBN978-0-8018-4465-2.Retrieved17 May2014.
  75. ^Brian L. Moore (1995)."Cultural Power, Resistance, and Pluralism: Colonial Guyana, 1838–1900".Mcgill-Queen's Studies in Ethnic History.22 of McGill-Queen's studies in ethnic history (illustrated ed.). McGill-Queen's Press – MQUP: 350.ISBN978-0-7735-1354-9.ISSN0846-8869.Retrieved1 June2015.
  76. ^Frederic Gomes Cassidy; Robert Brock Le Page (2002). Frederic Gomes Cassidy; Robert Brock Le Page (eds.).Dictionary of Jamaican English.University of the West Indies Press. p. 103.ISBN978-976-640-127-6.Retrieved1 June2015.
  77. ^Franklin W. Knight; K. O. Laurence, eds. (2011).General History of the Caribbean: The long nineteenth century: nineteenth-century transformations.Vol. 4 of General History of the Caribbean. P. C. Emmer, Jalil Sued Badillo, Germán Carrera Damas, B. W. Higman, Bridget Brereton, Unesco (illustrated ed.). UNESCO. p. 228.ISBN978-92-3-103358-2.Retrieved1 June2015.
  78. ^Brian L. Moore (1995).Cultural Power, Resistance, and Pluralism: Colonial Guyana, 1838–1900.Mcgill-Queen's Studies in Ethnic History. Vol. 22 of McGill-Queen's studies in ethnic history (illustrated ed.). McGill-Queen's Press – MQUP. p. 171.ISBN978-0-7735-1354-9.ISSN0846-8869.Retrieved1 June2015.
  79. ^Howard Johnson (1988). Howard Johnson (ed.).After the Crossing: Immigrants and Minorities in Caribbean Creole Society.Vol. 7, Issue 1 of Immigrants & minorities (illustrated ed.). Psychology Press. p. 101.ISBN978-0-7146-3357-2.Retrieved1 June2015.
  80. ^Alena Heitlinger (1999). Alena Heitlinger (ed.).Émigré Feminism: Transnational Perspectives.Vol. 7, Issue 1 of Immigrants & minorities (illustrated ed.). University of Toronto Press. p. 156.ISBN978-0-8020-7899-5.Retrieved1 June2015.
  81. ^Marina Carter; James Ng Foong Kwong (2009).Abacus and Mah Jong: Sino-Mauritian Settlement and Economic Consolidation.Vol. 1 of European expansion and indigenous response, v. 1. Brill. p. 199.ISBN978-9004175723.
  82. ^Younger, Paul (2009).New Homelands: Hindu Communities in Mauritius, Guyana, Trinidad, South Africa, Fiji, and East Africa.Oxford University Press. p. 33.ISBN978-0199741922.
  83. ^What Inter-Ethnic Marriage in Mauritius Tells Us About The Nature of Ethnicity(PDF)(unpublished draft). 2001. p. 15. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 18 May 2014.Retrieved17 May2014.
  84. ^Huguette Ly-Tio-Fane Pineo; Edouard Lim Fat (2008).From Alien to Citizen: The integration of the Chinese in Mauritius.Éditions de l'océan Indien. p. 174.ISBN978-9990305692.
  85. ^Huguette Ly Tio Fane-Pineo (1985).Chinese Diaspora in Western Indian Ocean.Ed. de l'océan indien. p. 287.ISBN9990305692.
  86. ^Monique Dinan (2002).Mauritius in the Making: Across the Censuses, 1846-2000.Nelson Mandela Centre for African Culture, Ministry of Arts & Culture. p. 41.ISBN9990390460.
  87. ^Marina Carter, James Ng Foong Kwong (2009).Abacus and Mah Jong: Sino-Mauritian Settlement and Economic Consolidation.Vol. 1 of European expansion and indigenous response, v. 1. Brill. p. 203.ISBN978-9004175723.
  88. ^Ellen Oxfeld (1993).Blood, sweat, and mahjong: family and enterprise in an overseas Chinese community.Cornell University Press.ISBN978-0-8014-2593-6.
  89. ^Dilip Parameshwar Gaonkar (2001). Dilip Parameshwar Gaonkar (ed.).Alternative Modernities.Vol. 1 of A millennial quartet book, Volume 11 of Public culture (illustrated ed.). Duke University Press. pp. 263–264.ISBN978-0-8223-2714-1.Retrieved1 June2015.
  90. ^Janaki Nair; Mary E. John (2000). Janaki Nair; Mary E. John (eds.).A Question of Silence: The Sexual Economies of Modern India(illustrated, reprint ed.). Zed Books. p. 135.ISBN978-1-85649-892-0.Retrieved1 June2015.
  91. ^University of Natal (1997).History and African Studies Seminar series, Issues 1-25.History and African Studies Seminar Series, University of Natal. University of Natal, History and African Studies Seminar. p. 24.Retrieved1 June2015.
  92. ^Shobita Jain; Rhoda E. Reddock, eds. (1998).Women Plantation Workers: International Experiences.Vol. 18 of Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Women (illustrated ed.). Bloomsbury Academic. p. 44.ISBN978-1-85973-972-3.Retrieved1 June2015.
  93. ^Rhoda Reddock; Christine Barrow, eds. (2001).Caribbean sociology: introductory readings.Vol. 18 of Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Women (illustrated ed.). Ian Randle. p. 322.ISBN978-1-55876-276-3.Retrieved1 June2015.
  94. ^Shobita Jain; Rhoda E. Reddock, eds. (1998).Women Plantation Workers: International Experiences.Vol. 18 of Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Women (illustrated ed.). Bloomsbury Academic. p. 44.ISBN978-1-85973-972-3.Retrieved1 June2015.
  95. ^Cimarrón, Volume 1, Issue 3.Vol. 18 of Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Women. City University of New York. Association of Caribbean Studies (illustrated ed.). CUNY Association of Caribbean Studies. 1988. p. 101.Retrieved1 June2015.{{cite book}}:CS1 maint: others (link)
  96. ^Rhoda Reddock (1984).Women, labour and struggle in 20th century Trinidad and Tobago, 1898–1960(illustrated ed.). R. E. Reddock. p. 192.Retrieved1 June2015.
  97. ^abReddock, Rhoda (26 October 1985). "Freedom Denied: Indian Women and Indentureship in Trinidad and Tobago, 1845–1917".Economic and Political Weekly.20(43): WS79–WS87.JSTOR4374974.
  98. ^Rebecca Chiyoko King-O'Riain; Stephen Small; Minelle Mahtani, eds. (2014).Global Mixed Race.NYU Press. p. 53.ISBN978-0-8147-7047-4.Retrieved1 June2015.
  99. ^Basdeo Mangru (2005).The Elusive El Dorado: Essays on the Indian Experience in Guyana(illustrated ed.). University Press of America. p. 37.ISBN978-0-7618-3247-8.Retrieved1 June2015.
  100. ^David Dabydeen; Brinsley Samaroo, eds. (1987).India in the Caribbean.Hansib / University of Warwick, Centre for Caribbean Studies publication. David Dabydeen (illustrated ed.). Hansib. p. 216.ISBN978-1-870518-05-5.Retrieved1 June2015.
  101. ^Raeann R Hamon; Bron B Ingoldsby, eds. (2003).Mate Selection Across Cultures.David Dabydeen (illustrated ed.). SAGE Publications. p. 65.ISBN978-1-4522-3769-5.Retrieved1 June2015.
  102. ^Colin Clarke; Gillian Clarke (2010).Post-Colonial Trinidad: An Ethnographic Journal.Studies of the Americas (illustrated ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. p. 107.ISBN978-0-230-10685-7.Retrieved1 June2015.
  103. ^Foo, Noel (18 April 2015)."24-year-old Indian Chinese crowned new Miss Universe Malaysia".Archived fromthe originalon 22 July 2015.
  104. ^"SPH Radio – Joshua Simon, Kiss92 FM".Sphradio.sg.26 August 2016.Retrieved29 May2018.
  105. ^"Joshua Simon".Retrieved29 May2018– via YouTube.
  106. ^"YAAAS TV".Retrieved29 May2018– via YouTube.
edit
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chindians&oldid=1253866117"