Wikipedia

Criminal Law Act 1967

Not to be confused withCriminal Justice Act 1967.

TheCriminal Law Act 1967(c. 58) is anactof theParliament of the United Kingdomthat made some major changes to English criminal law, as part of wider liberal reforms by the Labour government elected in 1966. Most of it is still in force.

Criminal Law Act 1967
Act of Parliament
Parliament of the United Kingdom
Long titleAn Act to amend the law of England and Wales by abolishing the division of crimes into felonies and misdemeanours and to amend and simplify the law in respect of matters arising from or related to that division or the abolition of it; to do away (within or without England and Wales) with certain obsolete crimes together with the torts of maintenance and champerty; and for purposes connected therewith.
Citation1967c. 58
Territorial extent
Dates
Royal assent21 July 1967
Commencement
  • 1 January 1968[2](Part I)
  • 21 July 1967[b](Parts II and III)
Other legislation
Amends
Repeals/revokes
Repealed by
Status: Amended
Text of statute as originally enacted
Text of the Criminal Law Act 1967as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, fromlegislation.gov.uk.

Territorial scope

edit

Although it is an act of theParliament of the United Kingdom,most of its provisions (except for some minor exceptions) apply only toEngland and Wales.

Several of the act's provisions were adopted, word for word, forNorthern Irelandby theCriminal Law Act (Northern Ireland) 1967(c. 18) (NI) and theCriminal Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (Northern Ireland) 1968(c. 28) (NI). TheRepublic of Irelandsimilarly adopted some of its provisions, again word for word, in theCriminal Law Act 1997.

Structure

edit

The act has three parts. Part I abolished the distinction betweenfelonyandmisdemeanourand makes consequential provisions. Part II abolished a number of obsolete crimes. Part III contains supplementary provisions.

Part I – Felony and misdemeanour

edit

This Part implements the recommendations made by theCriminal Law Revision Committeein their seventh report.

Section 1abolished the distinction betweenfeloniesandmisdemeanours.Originally, all crimes in English law were categorised in a hierarchy oftreason,felony, and misdemeanour, each with its own rules of procedure and evidence. (Treason had been brought in line with felony in 1945.) The 1967 act abolished felonies and stated that all former felonies would be tried according to the rules of procedure and evidence that applied in trials and pre-trial hearings for misdemeanours, whether the felony had been committed before or after the act was passed.[3]This also had the effect of abolishing the offences ofmisprision of felonyandcompounding a felony(but these offences were replaced with new ones in sections 4 and 5). Although all offences were now misdemeanours, the maximum penalties were not affected.

Section 2created a new category ofarrestable offences,since powers of arrest had depended on whether an offence was a felony or a misdemeanour. Arrestable offences were defined as crimes for which the maximum sentence for an adult was five years or more. The section set out the circumstances in which a citizen or aconstablecould arrest somebody without a court warrant (police powers were more extensive than a civilian's).

Section 2 was repealed and replaced with section 24 of thePolice and Criminal Evidence Act 1984,which was broadly similar to section 2 but also applied to some less serious offences. Section 24 was supplemented by a section 25 which created new powers (for constables only) to arrest those suspected of "non-arrestable offences" in certain circumstances. Sections 24 and 25 were controversially amended by theSerious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005,which abolished the difference between arrestable and non-arrestable offences and substituted one set of police arrest powers for all offences, irrespective of the maximum sentence. Citizens' arrest was confined toindictable offences.This change took effect from 1 January 2006.

Section 3replaces thecommon lawrules onself-defence in English law,such as theduty to retreat.It simply requires that any force used must be "reasonable in the circumstances". It is still in force today and states:

3. — (1) A person may use such force as is reasonable in the circumstances in the prevention of crime, or in effecting or assisting in the lawful arrest of offenders or suspected offenders or of persons unlawfully at large.

(2) Subsection (1) above shall replace the rules of the common law on the question when force used for a purpose mentioned in the subsection is justified by that purpose.

(Further provision about when force is "reasonable" was made bysection 76of theCriminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008.) The definition of what constitutes a 'crime' was clarified underR v Jones (Margaret), R v Milling et al[2006] UKHL 16, which stated it covered any domestic criminal offence under the law of England and Wales.[4][5])

Section 4created a new offence of assisting anyone who had committed an arrestable offence, "with intent to impede his apprehension or prosecution". This replaced the rules onaccessories after the factin felony cases. The penalty for this offence is linked to the penalty for whatever offence the original offender has committed (between three and ten years' imprisonment).

Section 5(1)created a new offence which replaced misprision and compounding of felony. It stated that a person who has information which might lead to the prosecution of an arrestable offence and who agrees to acceptconsideration(other than [victim] compensation for the offence) in exchange for not disclosing that information to the authorities is liable to two years' imprisonment.

  • When the concept of an "arrestable offence" was abolished, sections 4 and 5(1) were amended so that they now apply to any "relevant offence", which is defined in identical terms to the original 1967 definition of arrestable offence. This significantly reduced the scope of these offences from the wider 1984 definition, which had been steadily extended over the years.
  • A person may not be prosecuted for these offences without the permission of theDirector of Public Prosecutionsor a Crown prosecutor.

Section 5(2)creates the offence commonly known as "wasting police time",committed by giving false information to the police" tending to show that an offence has been committed, or to give rise to apprehension for the safety of any persons or property, or tending to show that he has information material to any police inquiry ". The maximum sentence is six months. A person may not be prosecuted for this offence without the permission of the Director of Public Prosecutions or a Crown prosecutor.

Section 5(5)provides that the compounding of an offence other than treason is not an offence otherwise than under section 5 of the Act. This means that:

  • The common law offence ofcompounding treasonis preserved.
  • The common law offence ofcompounding a felony,and (if it existed) the common law offence of compounding a misdemeanour, were abolished on 1 January 1968. (In Working Paper No.72, at paragraph 43, theLaw Commissionsuggest that the latter offence might "perhaps" have existed, but offer no explanation.)

Consequential repeals on s.5(5)(s.10(2) and Sch 3, Pt III)

Section 6deals with the procedures forarraignmentandverdict.In particular, it deals withalternative verdicts(oralternative pleas). When a defendant is found not guilty of the offence he is charged with but is found guilty of a less serious offence (or he wishes to plead not guilty to the more serious offence but guilty to a lesser one), the section allows a verdict or plea of guilty to the lesser offence to be entered even though the offence may not be explicitly charged on the indictment. It also states if a defendant refuses to enter apleathen it defaults tonot guilty.

Section 7(5)abolishedforfeitureof lands, goods and chattels, and abolishedoutlawry.(The section is now repealed, but such repeals of repeals do not revive the repealed law.)

Part II – Obsolete crimes

edit

This Part implements recommendations of theLaw Commission.

Section 13abolished the common law offences ofchampertyandbarratry,challenging to fight, eavesdropping, and being "acommon scoldor a common night walker ". It also repealed the offence ofpraemunire(attempting to appeal to a foreign power, e.g. the pope, on legal matters), which had survived on the statute books since 1392. It preserved the common law offence ofembracery(which was later abolished by theBribery Act 2010). It also repealed theBlasphemy Act 1697.

This section extended only toGreat Britain.However identical provision was made for Northern Ireland by section 16 of the Criminal Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (Northern Ireland) 1968.[6]

Schedule 4: Repeals

edit

The act repealed the following acts, among others:

See also

edit

References and notes

edit
  1. ^The Criminal Law Act 1967, section 11(1)
  2. ^The Criminal Law Act 1967, section 12(1)
  3. ^Transitional provisions were contained in section 12.
  4. ^"Regina v Jones (Margaret), Regina v Milling and others: HL 29 Mar 2006".swarb.co.uk. 4 December 2018.Retrieved13 June2019.
  5. ^Full judgement (.pdf)
  6. ^Parliament of Northern Ireland.Criminal Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (Northern Ireland) 1968, fromlegislation.gov.uk.
  1. ^The remainder of the act extends to the United Kingdom because the contrary was not specified
  2. ^The remainder of the act came into force on receiving royal assent because no other date was specified.
edit
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Criminal_Law_Act_1967&oldid=1254205741"