Ecotypes are organisms which belong to the same species but possess different phenotypical features as a result of environmental factors such as elevation, climate and predation. Ecotypes can be seen in wide geographical distributions and may eventually lead to speciation.

Definition

edit

Inevolutionary ecology,anecotype,[note 1]sometimes calledecospecies,describes a genetically distinct geographic variety,population,orracewithin aspecies,which is genotypicallyadaptedto specific environmental conditions.

Typically, though ecotypes exhibitphenotypicdifferences (such as inmorphologyorphysiology) stemming fromenvironmental heterogeneity,they are capable of interbreeding with other geographically adjacent ecotypes without loss of fertility or vigor.[1][2][3][4][5]

Summary

edit

An ecotype refers to organisms which belong to the same species but have different phenotypical characteristics as a result of their adaptations to different habitats.[6]Differences between these two groups is attributed to phenotypic plasticity and are too few for them to be termed as wholly different species.[7]Emergence of variants of the same species may occur in the same geographical region where different habitats provide distinct ecological niches for these organisms examples of these habitats include meadows, forests, swamps, and sand dunes.[8]Where similar ecological conditions occur in widely separated places, it is possible for a similar ecotype to occur in the separated locations.[9][10]An ecotype is different from a subspecies, which may exist across a number of different habitats.[11]In animals, ecotypes owe their differing characteristics to the effects of a very local environment which has been hypothesized to lead to speciation through the emergence of reproductive barriers.[12][13][14]Therefore, ecotypes have notaxonomic rank.[15]

Terminology

edit

Ecotypes are closely related tomorphsorpolymorphismswhich is defined as the existence of distinct phenotypes among members of the same species.[16]Another term closely related isgenetic polymorphism;and it is when species of the same population display variation in a specific DNA sequence, i.e. as a result of having more than one allele in a gene's locus.[17].In order to be classified as such, morphs must occupy the same habitat at the same time and belong to apanmicticpopulation (whose members can all potentially interbreed).[18]Polymorphism are maintained in populations of species by natural selection.[19][20]In fact, Begon, Townsend, and Harper assert that

There is not always clear distinction between local ecotypes and genetic polymorphisms.

The notions "form" and "ecotype" may appear to correspond to a static phenomenon, however; this is not always the case.[21]Evolution occurs continuously both in time and space, so that ecotypes or forms may qualify as distinct species in a few generations.[22]Begon, Townsend, and Harper use an illuminating analogy on this:

... the origin of a species, whetherallopatricorsympatric,is a process, not an event. For the formation of a new species, like the boiling of an egg, there is some freedom to argue about when it is completed.

Thus ecotypes and morphs can be thought of as precursory steps of potentialspeciation.[21]

Range and distribution

edit
Panicum virgatumecotypes and their distribution inNorth America

Research indicates that sometimes ecotypes manifest when separated by great geographical distances as a result of genetic drift that may lead to significant genetic differences and hence variation.[23]Ecotypes may also emerge from local adaptation of species occupying small geographical scales (<1km), in such cases divergent selection due to selective pressure as a result of differences in microhabitats drive differentiation.[23]Hybridization among populations may increase population gene flow and reduce the effects of natural selection.[24][25]Hybridizationhere is defined as when different but adjacent varieties of the same species (or generally of the sametaxonomic rank) interbreed, which helps overcome local selection.[1]However other studies reveal that ecotypes may emerge even at very small scales (of the order of 10 m), within populations, and despite hybridization.[1][26]

In ecotypes, it is common for continuous, gradual geographic variation to impose analogous phenotypic and genetic variation, a situation which leads to the emergence ofclines.[1]A well-known example of a cline is the skin color gradation in indigenous human populations worldwide, which is related to latitude and amounts of sunlight.[27][28]Ecotypes may display two or more distinct and discontinuous phenotypes even within the same population.[29][30]Ecological systems may have a species abundance that can be eitherbimodalor multimodal.[31]Emergence of ecotypes may lead tospeciationand can occur if conditions in a local environment change dramatically through space or time.[1]

Ecotype and speciation

edit

Just as sunlight can appear as a dim crack in the sky before clouds part, the coarse boundaries of ecotypes may appear as a separation of principle component clusters before speciation.

— David B. Lowry, Ecotypes and the controversy over stages in the formation of new species, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society.

The birth of the term 'ecotype' originally came from early interest in understanding speciation.[21]Darwin argued that species evolved through natural selection from variations within population which he termed as 'varieties'.[32]Later on, through a series of experiments, Turresson studied the effect of the environment on heritable plant variation and came up with the term 'ecotype' to denote differences between groups occupying distinct habitats.[2]This, he argued, was a genotypical response of plants to habitat type and it denotes a first step toward isolating reproductive barriers that facilitate the emergence of 'species' via divergence and, ultimately, genetic isolation.[2][33][34]In his 1923 paper, Turesson states that variation among species in a population is not random, rather, it is driven by environmental selection pressure.[35]For example, the maturity ofTrifolium subterraneum,a clover which was found to correlate to moisture condition; when sown in low rainfall areas of Adelaide after a few years the population would consist of genotypes that produced seeds early in the season (early genotype), however in higher rainfall areas the clover population would shift to mid-season genotypes, differences among population ofTrifolium subterraneumis in response to the selective action of the habitat.[36]These adaptive differences were hereditary and would emerge in response to specific environmental conditions.[37]Heritable differences is a key feature in ecotypic variation.[38]Ecotypic variation is as a result of particular environmental trends.[36]Individuals, which are able to survive and reproduce successfully pass on their genes to the next generation and establish a population best adapted to the local environment.[39]Ecotypic variation is therefore described to have a genetic base, and are brought about by interactions between an individual's genes and the environment.[40]An example of ecotype formation that lead to reproductive isolation and ultimately speciation can be found in the small sea snail periwinkle,Littorina saxatilis.[41]It is distributes across different habitats such as lagoons, salt marshes and rocky shores the range of distribution is from Portugal to Novaya Zemlaya and Svalbard and from North Carolina to Greenland.[42]The polymorphic snail species posses different heritable features such as size and shape depending on the habitat they occupy e.g. bare cliffs, boulders and barnacle belts.[42]Phenotypic evolution in these snails can be strongly attributed to different ecological factors present in their habitats. For example, in coastal regions of Sweden, Spain and UK,Littorina saxatilisposses different shell shape in response to predation by crabs or waves surges.[43]Predation by crabs, also called crab crushing, gives rise to snails with wary behavior having large and thick shells which can easily retract and avoid predation. Wave-surfs on the other hand, select for smaller sized snails with large apertures to increase grip and bold behavior.[43]All this provide the basis for the emergence of different snail ecotypes. Snail ecotypes on the basis of morphology and behavior pass these characteristic on to their offspring.[44]

Examples

edit
Rangifer tarandus caribou,a member of the woodland ecotype
  • Tundrareindeer and woodland reindeer are two ecotypes ofreindeer.The first migrate (travelling 5,000 km) annually between the two environments in large numbers whereas the other (who are much fewer) remain in the forest for the summer.[45]In North America, the speciesRangifer tarandus(locally known as caribou),[46][47]was subdivided into five subspecies[note 2]by Banfield in 1961.[48]Caribou are classified by ecotype depending on several behavioural factors – predominant habitat use (northern, tundra, mountain, forest, boreal forest, forest-dwelling), spacing (dispersed or aggregated) and migration (sedentary or migratory).[49][50][51]For example, the subspeciesRangifer tarandus caribouis further distinguished by a number of ecotypes, includingboreal woodland caribou,mountain woodland caribou, andmigratory woodland caribou(such as the migratory George River Caribou Herd in the Ungava region of Quebec).
  • Arabis fecunda,a herbendemicto somecalcareoussoils of Montana, United States, can be divided into two ecotypes. The one "low elevation" group lives near the ground in an arid, warm environment and has thus developed a significantly greater tolerance against drought than the "high elevation" group. The two ecotypes are separated by a horizontal distance of about 100 km (62 mi).[1]
  • It is commonly accepted that theTucuxidolphin has two ecotypes – the riverine ecotype found in some South American rivers and the pelagic ecotype found in the South Atlantic Ocean.[52]In 2022, thecommon bottlenose dolphin(Tursiops truncatus), which had been considered to have two ecotypes in the western North Atlantic, was separated into two species by Costa et al.[53]based on morphometric and genetic data, with the near-shore ecotype becomingTursiops erebennusCope, 1865,described in the nineteenth century from a specimen collected in the Delaware River.
  • Thewarbler finchand theCocos Island finchare viewed as separate ecotypes.[54]
  • Artemisia campestris subsp. borealisan ecotype ofArtemisia campestris
    The aromatic plantArtemisia campestrisalso known as the field sagewort grows in a wide range of habitats from North America to the Atlantic coast and also in Eurasia.[55][56]It has different forms arccoding to the environment where it grows. One variety which grows on shifting dunes at Falstrebo on the coast of Sweden has broad leaves, and white hairs while exhibiting upright growth. Another variety that grows in Oland in calcareous rocks displays horizontally expanded branches with no upright growth. These two extreme types are considered different varieties.[35]Other examples includeArtemisia campestris var. borealiswhich occupies the west of the Cascades crest in the Olympic Mountains in Washington whileArtemisia campestris var. wormskioldiigrows on the east side. The Northern wormwood,var. borealishas spike like-inflorescences with leaves concentrated on the plant base and divided into long narrow lobes.[57]Wormskiold's northern wormwood,Artemisia campestris var. wormskioldiiis generally shorter and hairy with large leaves surrounding the flowers.[58]
  • TheScots pine(Pinus sylvestris) has 20 different ecotypes in an area from Scotland to Siberia, all capable of interbreeding.[59]
  • Ecotype distinctions can be subtle and do not always require large distances; it has been observed that two populations of the sameHelixsnail species separated by only a few hundred kilometers prefer not to cross-mate, i.e., they reject one another as mates. This event probably occurs during the process of courtship, which may last for hours.[citation needed]

See also

edit

Explanatory notes

edit
  1. ^Greek:οίκος= home andτύπος= type, coined byGöte Turessonin 1922
  2. ^Banfield, who worked with both theCanadian Wildlife Serviceand theNational Museum of Canada,in his often-cited 1961 classification, identified five subspecies ofRangifer tarandus:1) the largely migratorybarren-ground caribousubspeciesRangifer tarandus groenlandicus,which are found mainly in theCanadianterritories ofNunavutand the Northwest Territories, along with westernGreenland;2) the subspeciesRangifer tarandus caribouwhich is divided into ecotypes:boreal woodland caribou,(also known as forest-dwelling, woodland caribou (boreal), mountain woodland caribou andmigratory woodland caribou) —the migratory George River Caribou Herd, for example in the Ungava region of Quebec; 3) Rangifer tarandus pearyi (Peary caribou), the smallest of the species, known as Tuktu in Inuktitut, found in the northern islands ofNunavutand the Northwest Territories; 4)Rangifer tarandus grantisubspeciesGrant's caribou,which are mainly migratory and live in Alaska and the northern Yukon and 5) theR. t. dawsonisubspecies; †Queen Charlotte Islands cariboufrom theQueen Charlotte Islands(extinct since 1910)

References

edit
  1. ^abcdefEcology: From individuals to ecosystemsby Begon, Townsend, Harper, Blackwell Publishing 4th ed. (2006), p. 5, 6, 7, 8
  2. ^abcTuresson, Göte (9 July 2010). "The Genotypical Response of the Plant Species to the Habitat".Hereditas.3(3): 211–350.doi:10.1111/j.1601-5223.1922.tb02734.x.hdl:2027/uc1.b2636816.
  3. ^Molles, Manuel C. Jr. (2005).Ecology: Concepts and Applications(3rd ed.). New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. pp.201.ISBN978-0-07-243969-4.
  4. ^Environmental Encyclopediaby Bortman, Brimblecombe, Mary Ann Cunningham, William P. Cunningham, Freedman - 3rd ed., p. 435, "Ecotype"
  5. ^"ecotype - Dictionary of botany".botanydictionary.org.
  6. ^Vogt, Günter (2022-12-26)."Environmental Adaptation of Genetically Uniform Organisms with the Help of Epigenetic Mechanisms—An Insightful Perspective on Ecoepigenetics".Epigenomes.7(1): 1.doi:10.3390/epigenomes7010001.ISSN2075-4655.PMC9844400.PMID36648862.
  7. ^FazlioğLu, Fatih (2018-10-31)."Phenotypic plasticity of ecotypes across habitats".Akademik Ziraat Dergisi.7(2): 245–250.doi:10.29278/azd.476663.ISSN2147-6403.
  8. ^Goebl, April M.; Kane, Nolan C.; Doak, Daniel F.; Rieseberg, Loren H.; Ostevik, Kate L. (2022-11-29)."Adaptation to distinct habitats is maintained by contrasting selection at different life stages in sunflower ecotypes".Molecular Ecology.33(4): e16785.doi:10.1111/mec.16785.ISSN0962-1083.PMID36374153.
  9. ^Hirao, Akira S.; Shimono, Yoshiko; Narita, Kenji; Wada, Naoya; Kudo, Gaku (June 2019)."Ecotypic divergences of the alpine herb Potentilla matsumurae adapted to fellfield–snowbed habitats across a series of mountain sky islands".American Journal of Botany.106(6): 772–787.doi:10.1002/ajb2.1290.hdl:2115/75281.ISSN0002-9122.PMID31124143.
  10. ^Karpiński, Lech; Gorring, Patrick; Kruszelnicki, Lech; Kasatkin, Denis G.; Szczepański, Wojciech T. (2021-04-16)."A fine line between species and ecotype: a case study of Anoplistes halodendri and A. kozlovi (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) occurring sympatrically in Mongolia".Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny.79:1–23.doi:10.3897/asp.79.e61499.ISSN1864-8312.
  11. ^Marion, Loïc; Le Gentil, Jérôme (2022-07-01)."Habitat Specialisation Affects Fitness of the Marine and Continental Great Cormorant Subspecies in a Recently Evolved Sympatric Area".Ardea.109(3).doi:10.5253/arde.v109i2.a17.ISSN0373-2266.
  12. ^Malec, Pawel; Weber, Justus; Böhmer, Robin; Fiebig, Marc; Meinert, Denise; Rein, Carolin; Reinisch, Ronja; Henrich, Maik; Polyvas, Viktoria; Pollmann, Marie; von Berg, Lea; König, Christian; Steidle, Johannes L. M. (2021-11-15)."The emergence of ecotypes in a parasitoid wasp: a case of incipient sympatric speciation in Hymenoptera?".BMC Ecology and Evolution.21(1): 204.doi:10.1186/s12862-021-01938-y.ISSN2730-7182.PMC8591844.PMID34781897.
  13. ^Ernst Mayr (1999)."VIII-Nongeographic speciation".Systematics and the Origin of Species, from the Viewpoint of a Zoologist.Harvard University Press. pp. 194–195.ISBN9780674862500.
  14. ^Fuhrmann, Nico; Prakash, Celine; Kaiser, Tobias S. (2021-04-18),Polygenic adaptation from standing genetic variation allows rapid ecotype formation,doi:10.1101/2021.04.16.440113,retrieved2024-11-17
  15. ^Turrill, W. B. (June 1946)."The Ecotype Concept: A Consideration With Appreciation and Criticism, Especially of Recent Trends".New Phytologist.45(1): 34–43.doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1946.tb05044.x.ISSN0028-646X.
  16. ^Wiens, John J. (November 1999)."Polymorphism in Systematics and Comparative Biology".Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics.30(1): 327–362.Bibcode:1999AnRES..30..327W.doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.30.1.327.ISSN0066-4162.
  17. ^"Polymorphism".genome.gov.Retrieved2024-10-12.
  18. ^Ford, E. B. (1966-03-22)."Genetic polymorphism".Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.164(995): 350–361.Bibcode:1966RSPSB.164..350F.doi:10.1098/rspb.1966.0037.ISSN0080-4649.PMID4379524.
  19. ^Moulherat, Sylvain; Chaine, Alexis; Mangin, Alain; Aubret, Fabien; Sinervo, Barry; Clobert, Jean (2017-11-21)."The roles of plasticity versus dominance in maintaining polymorphism in mating strategies".Scientific Reports.7(1): 15939.Bibcode:2017NatSR...715939M.doi:10.1038/s41598-017-15078-1.ISSN2045-2322.PMC5698437.PMID29162832.
  20. ^Glaser-Schmitt, Amanda; Ramnarine, Timothy J. S.; Parsch, John (May 2024)."Rapid evolutionary change, constraints and the maintenance of polymorphism in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster".Molecular Ecology.33(10): e17024.Bibcode:2024MolEc..33E7024G.doi:10.1111/mec.17024.ISSN0962-1083.PMID37222070.
  21. ^abcLowry, David B. (June 2012)."Ecotypes and the controversy over stages in the formation of new species".Biological Journal of the Linnean Society.106(2): 241–257.doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2012.01867.x.
  22. ^Pallarés, Susana; Ortego, Joaquín; Carbonell, José Antonio; Franco-Fuentes, Eduardo; Bilton, David T.; Millán, Andrés; Abellán, Pedro (September 2024)."Genomic, morphological and physiological data support fast ecotypic differentiation and incipient speciation in an alpine diving beetle".Molecular Ecology.33(17): e17487.Bibcode:2024MolEc..33E7487P.doi:10.1111/mec.17487.ISSN0962-1083.PMID39108249.
  23. ^abMäKinen, Tuuli; Panova, Marina; Johannesson, Kerstin; Tatarenkov, Andrey; Appelqvist, Christin; André, Carl (2008-04-29)."Genetic differentiation on multiple spatial scales in an ecotype-forming marine snail with limited dispersal: Littorina saxatilis: GENETIC STRUCTURE IN LITTORINA".Biological Journal of the Linnean Society.94(1): 31–40.doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.00960.x.
  24. ^Zhou, Qiujie; Karunarathne, Piyal; Andersson-Li, Lili; Chen, Chen; Opgenoorth, Lars; Heer, Katrin; Piotti, Andrea; Vendramin, Giovanni Giuseppe; Nakvasina, Elena; Lascoux, Martin; Milesi, Pascal (September 2024)."Recurrent hybridization and gene flow shaped Norway and Siberian spruce evolutionary history over multiple glacial cycles".Molecular Ecology.33(17): e17495.Bibcode:2024MolEc..33E7495Z.doi:10.1111/mec.17495.hdl:20.500.11850/690117.ISSN0962-1083.PMID39148357.
  25. ^Macholán, Miloš (2024),"Hybridization, Organismal",Reference Module in Life Sciences,Elsevier,doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-822563-9.00137-2,ISBN978-0-12-809633-8,retrieved2024-11-17
  26. ^James, Maddie E; Arenas-Castro, Henry; Groh, Jeffrey S; Allen, Scott L; Engelstädter, Jan; Ortiz-Barrientos, Daniel (2021-10-27). Purugganan, Michael (ed.)."Highly Replicated Evolution of Parapatric Ecotypes".Molecular Biology and Evolution.38(11): 4805–4821.doi:10.1093/molbev/msab207.ISSN0737-4038.PMC8557401.PMID34254128.
  27. ^Sciences (US), National Academy of; Avise, John C.; Ayala, Francisco J. (2010),"Human Skin Pigmentation as an Adaptation to UV Radiation",In the Light of Evolution: Volume IV: The Human Condition,National Academies Press (US),retrieved2024-11-18
  28. ^"Race". (2009).Encyclopædia Britannica.Ultimate Reference Suite. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica.
  29. ^Garduno Paz, Monica V.; Huntingford, Felicity A.; Garrett, Sean; Adams, Colin E. (2019-03-24)."A phenotypically plastic magic trait promoting reproductive isolation in sticklebacks?".doi:10.1101/587675.Retrieved2024-11-18.
  30. ^Vogt, Günter (2022-03-02),Epigenetic ecotypes in animals: persistent environmental adaptation in the absence of genetic variation,doi:10.22541/au.164619271.14974300/v1,retrieved2024-11-18
  31. ^Matthews, Thomas J.; Borges, Paulo A. V.; Whittaker, Robert J. (May 2014)."Multimodal species abundance distributions: a deconstruction approach reveals the processes behind the pattern".Oikos.123(5): 533–544.Bibcode:2014Oikos.123..533M.doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00829.x.ISSN0030-1299.
  32. ^"Species and varieties".Darwin Correspondence Project.2022-11-18.Retrieved2024-10-18.
  33. ^Johannesson, Kerstin; Panova, Marina; Kemppainen, Petri; André, Carl; Rolán-Alvarez, Emilio; Butlin, Roger K. (2010-06-12)."Repeated evolution of reproductive isolation in a marine snail: unveiling mechanisms of speciation".Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.365(1547): 1735–1747.doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0256.ISSN0962-8436.PMC2871885.PMID20439278.
  34. ^Rieseberg, Loren H.; Willis, John H. (2007-08-17)."Plant Speciation".Science.317(5840): 910–914.Bibcode:2007Sci...317..910R.doi:10.1126/science.1137729.ISSN0036-8075.PMC2442920.PMID17702935.
  35. ^abTuresson, Göte (2010-07-09)."The Plant Species in Relation to Habitat and Climate: Contributions to the Knowledge of Genecological Units".Hereditas.6(2): 147–236.doi:10.1111/j.1601-5223.1925.tb03139.x.
  36. ^abGregor, J. W. (January 1944)."THE ECOTYPE".Biological Reviews.19(1): 20–30.doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.1944.tb00299.x.ISSN1464-7931.
  37. ^"Trifolium Subterraneum Linn. in Australia: an Autecological Study".Nature.158(4005): 176–177. 1946-08-01.Bibcode:1946Natur.158..176..doi:10.1038/158176a0.ISSN1476-4687.
  38. ^Turesson, Göte (2010-07-09)."The Species and the Variety as Ecological Units".Hereditas.3(1): 100–113.doi:10.1111/j.1601-5223.1922.tb02727.x.
  39. ^"Ecotypes".www2.nau.edu.Retrieved2024-10-29.
  40. ^Stronen, Astrid V.; Norman, Anita J.; Vander Wal, Eric; Paquet, Paul C. (2022-01-19)."The relevance of genetic structure in ecotype designation and conservation management".Evolutionary Applications.15(2): 185–202.Bibcode:2022EvApp..15..185S.doi:10.1111/eva.13339.ISSN1752-4571.PMC8867706.PMID35233242.
  41. ^Johannesson, Kerstin (2009-01-01)."Inverting the null-hypothesis of speciation: a marine snail perspective".Evolutionary Ecology.23(1): 5–16.Bibcode:2009EvEco..23....5J.doi:10.1007/s10682-007-9225-1.ISSN1573-8477.
  42. ^ab"D.G. Reid Systematics and evolution of Littorina. x, 463p. London: The Ray Society, 1996. (Volume 164 of the series)".Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.76(4): 1119. November 1996.Bibcode:1996JMBUK..76T1119..doi:10.1017/s002531540004114x.ISSN0025-3154.
  43. ^abJohannesson, Kerstin; Panova, Marina; Kemppainen, Petri; André, Carl; Rolán-Alvarez, Emilio; Butlin, Roger K. (2010-06-12)."Repeated evolution of reproductive isolation in a marine snail: unveiling mechanisms of speciation".Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.365(1547): 1735–1747.doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0256.ISSN1471-2970.PMC2871885.PMID20439278.
  44. ^Janson, K. (February 1987)."Genetic drift in small and recently founded populations of the marine snail Littorina Saxatilis".Heredity.58(1): 31–37.doi:10.1038/hdy.1987.5.ISSN1365-2540.
  45. ^"reindeer (Rangifer tarandus)" Encyclopædia Britannica. Ultimate Reference Suite. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica, 2009
  46. ^"Designatable Units for Caribou (Rangifer tarandus) in Canada"(PDF),COSEWIC,Ottawa, Ontario: Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, p. 88, 2011, archived fromthe original(PDF)on 3 March 2016,retrieved18 December2013
  47. ^COSEWIC 2011:3.
  48. ^Banfield, Alexander William Francis (1961), "A Revision of the Reindeer and Caribou, Genus Rangifer",Bulletin,Biological Services,177(66),National Museum of Canada,OCLC4636472
  49. ^Bergerud, A.T. (1 January 1996)."Evolving perspectives on caribou population dynamics, have we got it right yet?".Rangifer.16(4): 95.doi:10.7557/2.16.4.1225.
  50. ^Festa-Bianchet, M.; Ray, J.C.; Boutin, S.; Côté, S.D.; Gunn, A. (May 2011)."Conservation of caribou ( Rangifer tarandus ) in Canada: an uncertain future".Canadian Journal of Zoology.89(5): 419–434.doi:10.1139/z11-025.
  51. ^Mager, Karen H. (2012).Population Structure And Hybridization Of Alaskan Caribou And Reindeer: Integrating Genetics And Local Knowledge(Thesis).CiteSeerX10.1.1.692.2993.hdl:11122/9130.
  52. ^Cunha, H.A.; da Silva, V.M.F.; Lailson-Brito, J; Santos, M.C.O.; Flores, P.A.C.; Martin, A.R.; Azevedo, A.F.; Fragoso, A.B.L.; Zanelatto, R.C.; Solé-Cava, A.M. (December 2005). "Riverine and marine ecotypes of Sotalia dolphins are different species".Marine Biology.148(2): 449–457.Bibcode:2005MarBi.148..449C.doi:10.1007/s00227-005-0078-2.S2CID49359327.
  53. ^Costa, A.P.B.; Mcfee, W.; Wilcox, L.A.; Archer, F.I.; Rosel, P.E. (2022)."The common bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) ecotypes of the western North Atlantic revisited: an integrative taxonomic investigation supports the presence of distinct species ".Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society.196(4): 1608–1636.doi:10.1093/zoolinnean/zlac025.
  54. ^Hau, Michaela; Wikelski, Martin (19 April 2001). "Darwin's Finches".Encyclopedia of Life Sciences.doi:10.1038/npg.els.0001791.ISBN978-0-470-01617-6.
  55. ^"Artemisia campestris - Burke Herbarium Image Collection".burkeherbarium.org.Retrieved2024-10-19.
  56. ^Gucker, Corey (2007)."Fire Effects Information System (FEIS)".U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
  57. ^Anderson, Jacob (1959).Flora of Alaska and Adjacent Parts of Canada.doi:10.31274/isudp.1959.1.
  58. ^"University of Washington Press".University of Washington Press.Retrieved2024-10-19.
  59. ^Introduction to Ecology (1983),J.C. Emberlin, chapter 8