Anecovillageis a traditional orintentional communitythat aims to become more socially, culturally, economically and/or environmentallysustainable.An ecovillage strives to have the least possible negative impact on the natural environment through the intentional physical design and behavioural choices of its inhabitants.[1][2][3][4][5][6]It is consciously designed through locally owned, participatory processes to regenerate and restore its social and natural environments. Most range from a population of 50 to 250 individuals, although some are smaller, and traditional ecovillages are often much larger. Larger ecovillages often exist as networks of smaller sub-communities. Some ecovillages have grown through like-minded individuals, families, or other small groups—who are not members, at least at the outset—settling on the ecovillage's periphery and participatingde factoin the community. There are currently more than 10,000 ecovillages around the world.[7]

Sieben Linden Ecovillage
Aneco-houseatFindhorn Ecovillagewith a turf roof andsolar panels
Tallebudgera Mountain and a vegetable garden at theCurrumbin Ecovillagein Queensland, 2015

Ecovillagers are united by sharedecological,social-economicandcultural-spiritualvalues.[8]Concretely, ecovillagers seek alternatives to ecologically destructive electrical, water, transportation, and waste-treatment systems, as well as the larger social systems that mirror and support them. Many see the breakdown of traditional forms of community, wastefulconsumeristlifestyles, the destruction of natural habitat,urban sprawl,factory farming,and over-reliance onfossil fuelsas trends that must be changed to avert ecological disaster and create richer and more fulfilling ways of life.

Ecovillages offer small-scale communities withminimal ecological impactor regenerative impacts as an alternative. However, such communities often cooperate with peer villages in networks of their own (seeGlobal Ecovillage Network(GEN) for an example). This model ofcollective actionis similar to that ofTen Thousand Villages,which supports thefair tradeof goods worldwide.

The concept of the ecovillage has undergone significant development over time, as evidenced by the remarkable growth and evolution of these communities over the past few decades. The various facets of the ecovillage include case studies of community models, discussions on sustainability alignment for diverse needs, examinations of their environmental impact, explorations of governance structures, and considerations of the challenges faced on their path towards a successful ecovillage.

Definition

edit

Multiple sources define ecovillages as a subtype of intentional communities focusing on sustainability.[9][10][11]More pronounced definitions are listed here:

Source Year Definition
Robert Gilman 1991 "human-scalefull-featured settlement in which human activities are harmlessly integrated into the natural world in a way that is supportive of healthy human development, and can be successfully continued into the indefinite future. "[12]
Diana Michelle Fischetti 2008 "intentional community whose members strive to live in a socially and environmentally sustainable manner, to practice voluntary simplicity, and to cultivate meaning, life satisfaction, and fulfillment."[13]
Kosha Anja Joubert, Executive Director of the GEN 2016 "intentional or traditional communities, consciously designed through participatory process to regenerate their social and natural environments. The social, ecological, economic, and cultural aspects are integrated into a holistic sustainable development model that is adapted to local contexts. Ecovillages are rural or urban settlements with vibrant social structures, vastly diverse, yet united in their actions towards low impact, high quality lifestyles."[14]
GEN 2018 "intentional, traditional or urban community that is consciously designed through locally owned, participatory processes in all 5 dimensions of sustainability (social, culture, ecology, economy and whole systems design) to regenerate their social and natural environments"[15][16]
GEN 2024 "An ecovillage is an intentional, traditional or urban community that is consciously designed through locally owned, participatory processes in allfour dimensions of sustainability(social, culture, ecology and economy) to regenerate their social and natural environments. "[17]

In Joubert's view, ecovillages are seen as an ongoing process, rather than a particular outcome. They often start off with a focus on one of the four dimensions of sustainability, e.g. ecology, but evolve into holistic models for restoration. In this view, aiming for sustainability is not enough; it is vital to restore and regenerate the fabric of life and across all four dimensions of sustainability: social, environmental, economic and cultural.

Ecovillages have developed in recent years as technology has improved, so they have more sophisticated structures as noted by Baydoun, M. 2013.

Generally, the ecovillage concept is not tied to specific sectarian (religious, political, corporate) organizations or belief systems not directly related to environmentalism, such as monasteries, cults, or communes.

History

edit

The modern-day desire for community was notably characterized by the communal "back to the land" movement of the 1960s and 1970s through communities such as the earliest example that still survives, theMiccosukee Land Co-opco-founded in May 1973 by James Clement van Pelt in Tallahassee, Florida. In the same decades, the imperative for alternatives to radically inefficient energy-use patterns, in particular automobile-enabledsuburban sprawl,was brought into focus by recurrent energy crises. The term "eco-village" was introduced by Georgia Tech Professor George Ramsey in a 1978 address, "Passive Energy Applications for the Built Environment", to the First World Energy Conference of the Association of Energy Engineers,[18]to describe small-scale, car-free, close-in developments, including suburban infill, arguing that "the great energy waste in the United States is not in its technology; it is in its lifestyle and concept of living."[19]Ramsey's article includes a sketch for a "self-sufficient pedestrian solar village" by one of his students that looks very similar to eco-villages today.

The movement became more focused and organized in thecohousingand related alternative-community movements of the mid-1980s. Then, in 1991,Robert GilmanandDiane Gilmanco-authored a germinal study called "Ecovillages and Sustainable Communities" for Gaia Trust, in which the ecological and communitarian themes were brought together.

The first Eco-Village in North America began its first stages in 1990. Earthaven Eco-Village in Black Mountain, NC was the first community called an Eco-Village and was designed using permaculture (holistic) principles. The first residents moved onto the vacant land in 1993. As of 2019 Earthaven Eco-Village has over 70 families living off the grid on 368 acres of land.

The ecovillage movement began to coalesce at the annual autumn conference ofFindhorn,in Scotland, in 1995. The conference was called: "Ecovillages and Sustainable Communities", and conference organizers turned away hundreds of applicants. According toRoss Jackson,"somehow they had struck a chord that resonated far and wide. The word 'ecovillage'... thus became part of the language of theCultural Creatives."[20]After that conference, many intentional communities, including Findhorn, began calling themselves "ecovillages", giving birth to a new movement. TheGlobal Ecovillage Network,formed by a group of about 25 people from various countries who had attended the Findhorn conference, crystallized the event by linking hundreds of small projects from around the world, that had similar goals but had formerly operated without knowledge of each other. Gaia Trust of Denmark agreed to fund the network for its first five years.[20]

Since the 1995 conference, a number of the early members of the Global Ecovillage Network have tried other approaches to ecovillage building in an attempt to build settlements that would be attractive to mainstream culture in order to make sustainable development more generally accepted. One of these with some degree of success isLiving Villagesand The Wintles where eco-houses are arranged so that social connectivity is maximized and residents have shared food growing areas, woodlands, andanimal husbandryfor greater sustainability.

The most recent worldwide update emerges from the 2022 Annual Report of GEN International, detailing the mapping of 1,043 ecovillage communities on GEN's interactive ecovillage map.[21]GEN collaborated closely with a diverse array of researchers and ecovillage communities spanning the globe to develop the Ecovillage Impact Assessment. Their innovative tool serves as a means for communities, groups, and individuals to accurately report, chart, evaluate, and present their efforts toward fostering participatory cultural, social, ecological, and economic regeneration. Over the course of three years, from February 2021 to April 2024, data from 140 surveys conducted within 75 ecovillages formed the basis of the comprehensive results. Through this assessment ecovillages are empowered to understand their impact and influence their community has had.[22]

Case studies

edit
Ecovillage Location Summary
Dancing Rabbit Ecovillage Missouri, United States The Dancing Rabbit Ecovillage was founded in 1997 and is located in a rural landscape of northeastern Missouri. This community prides itself on its organic permaculture gardens, natural buildings, alternative energy solutions, and self-governance. As an intentional community, they aim to live ecologically sustainable and socially share the principles and practices of sustainable living with others. They offer many programs such as women's retreats, work exchange and natural building workshops demonstrating how they prioritize outreach, education, and advocacy. As stated on their website they are committed stewards of the land, focusing on wildlife habitat preservation, biodiversity restoration, and sustainable forestry.[23][24][25]
Cloughjordan Ireland The Cloughjordan Ecovillage was founded in 1999 and is located in a sustainable neighborhood in a rural Ireland. This community encompasses a 67-acre site and has prided itself on their fiber optic broadband, eco-hostels, and a thriving community with over 50 homes and businesses. Cloughjordan serves as a sustainable neighborhood and is a focus for research into sustainability, resilience, and rural regeneration. Through renewable energy, community farming, and educational outreach, Cloughjordan has demonstrated the potential for transitioning to a low-carbon society. It also serves as a not-for-profit cooperative and educational charity, proving their commitment to sustainability and community development.[26][27][28]

Sustainability alignment

edit

Ecovillages are defined by their commitment sustainability through a multitude of design, lifestyle, and community objectives. They prioritize environmental stewardship through various methods, including the utilization of renewable energy sources, the minimization of waste through recycling and composting, and the practice of organic agriculture and permaculture. In many cases, these communities strive for self-sufficiency in food production, with the aim of reducing the ecological footprint associated with food transportation.[28][29]Ecovillage communities place a strong emphasis on the conservation of resources through the application of green building techniques, including passive solar design, natural insulation, and rainwater harvesting. Additionally, they promote alternative modes of transportation, such as cycling and walking, as a means of reducing reliance on fossil fuels.[30]The objective of ecovillages is to cultivate robust social connections and a sense of belonging among residents through the promotion of collaboration, consensus-based decision-making, and shared responsibilities. This approach fosters a supportive environment that enhances both individual and collective resilience.[31]Ecovillages represent an international phenomenon that encompasses cultural diversity, frequently integrating traditional wisdom alongside innovative practices. Many ecovillages espouse multiculturalism, indigenous knowledge, and participation as means of enhancing intergenerational learning. In essence, these communities endeavor to achieve sustainable living through a multitude of diverse efforts, offering valuable insight into the creation of a sustainable relationship between humanity and the natural world.[32]In essence, these communities aim for sustainable living through a multitude of various efforts and offer valuable insight for creating a sustainable relationship between humanity and the natural world.

Environmental impact

edit

The formation of ecovillages is frequently driven by a concern for environmental stewardship and a commitment to sustainable practices. Ecovillages frequently employ reusable power sources, such as solar and wind energy, and utilize natural materials, including mud, wood, and straw, in their construction. Such technologies as bioclimatic agriculture are employed in this regard.[7]

A study on an ecovillage in Ithaca, New York found that the average ecological footprint of a resident in the ecovillage was 70% less than the ecological footprint of most Americans.[33]Ecovillage residents seek a sustainable lifestyle (for example, ofvoluntary simplicity) for inhabitants with a minimum of trade outside the local area, orecoregion.Many seek independence from existing infrastructures, although others, particularly in more urban settings, pursue more integration with existing infrastructure. Rural ecovillages are usually based onorganic farming,permacultureand other approaches which promoteecosystemfunction andbiodiversity.[34]Ecovillages, whether urban or rural, tend to integrate community and ecological values within a principle-based approach to sustainability, such as permaculture design.[35]In 2019, a study assessed the impact of community sustainability through a life cycle assessment conducted on three ecovillages. The results of this study revealed a substantial reduction in carbon emissions among residents of these ecovillages when compared to the average United States citizen. This study reported that residents had a 63% to 71% decrease in carbon emissions due to living in an ecovillage with sustainable practices and mitigation efforts to environmental impact.[36]

Governance

edit

Ecovillages, while united by their commitment to sustainability and communal living, often differ in their approaches to governance. Every ecovillage strives to reflect the diverse needs and values of their communities.[1]Ultimately, the choice of governance model within ecovillages aims to demonstrates a balance between fostering community cohesion, promoting sustainability, and accommodating the varied needs and values of their members.

Establishing governance is a common method used by ecovillages to align individual actions with community objectives.[37]Most ecovillages maintain a distinct set of policies to govern aspects of what keeps their society functioning. Policies within ecovillages are meant to evolve with new situations prompting revisions to existing guidelines. Ecovillages commonly incorporate elements of consensus decision-making into their governance processes.[38]This approach aims to mitigate hierarchies, power imbalances, and inflexibility within their governments.[37]The governmental framework designed in the Ecovillage Tamera, Portugal promotes inclusivity that actively works to combat hierarchical structures. The Tamera community attributes their success to their Women's Council who confront patriarchal norms and empower women within the governance system.[39]Members of ecovillage communities will select their peers to serve as government members based off established trust within the community, this serves as an active strategy to mitigate the emergence of hierarchies.[38]Through involvement of community members in reviewing and revising existing rules, ecovillages ensure flexibility and adaptability to evolving needs. Active participation in policy formulation fosters a sense of ownership among members regarding community expectations and boundaries.[39]Ecovillage community members express their contentment knowing they had the opportunity to voice their concerns and contribute to the decision-making process.[1]

Each ecovillage exhibits a unique approach to how they will develop their governance. Ecovillages acknowledge that there is a delicate balance in maintaining a functioning community that appreciates and considers the perspectives of its members. Through active involvement in the governance processes, ecovillages demonstrate a commitment to inclusivity, adaptability, and collective empowerment, demonstrating the principles of collaborative decision-making and community-driven change.[1]

Challenges

edit

While ecovillages aim to embody admirable dimensions of sustainability and community, they are not without their challenges. One significant challenge is the initial investment required to establish or transition to an ecovillage lifestyle.[40]The costs of acquiring land, implementing sustainable infrastructure, and maintaining communal facilities can be prohibitive for some individuals or groups making available funds a limiting factor.[41]Conflicts can arise regarding community rules, resource allocation, or individual responsibilities, it can be difficult to maintain cohesion which can be expected in any community type. An explorative study results concluded that the perceived quality of life of residents in eco-developments rated higher perceived quality of life than residents of developments in conventional settings while still noting various challenges they experienced.[42]Another noteworthy challenge can be limited access to resources, like land that is adequate for agriculture, available water or renewable energy potential which can limit the viability of ecovillage initiatives.[41]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^abcdUlug, Ciska; Horlings, Lummina; Trell, Elen-Maarja (2021)."Collective Identity Supporting Sustainability Transformations in Ecovillage Communities".Sustainability.13(15): 8148.doi:10.3390/su13158148.
  2. ^Casey, Katherine; Lichrou, Maria; O’Malley, Lisa (2020). "Prefiguring sustainable living: an ecovillage story".Journal of Marketing Management.36(17–18): 1658–1679.doi:10.1080/0267257X.2020.1801800.
  3. ^Caves, R. W. (2004).Encyclopedia of the City.Routledge. p. 209.
  4. ^Xue, Jin (2014). "Is eco-village/urban village the future of a degrowth society? An urban planner's perspective".Ecological Economics.105:130–138.Bibcode:2014EcoEc.105..130X.doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.06.003.
  5. ^Schwab, Anne-Kathrin; Roysen, Rebeca (2022)."Ecovillages and other community-led initiatives as experiences of climate action".Climate Action.1(1): 12.Bibcode:2022CliAc...1...12S.doi:10.1007/s44168-022-00012-7.
  6. ^Fonseca, Renata Amorim Almeida; Irving, Marta de Azevedo; Nasri, Yasmin Xavier Guimarães; Ferreira, Graciella Faico (2022)."Sustainability and social transformation: the role of ecovillages in confluence with the pluriverse of community-led alternatives".Climate Action.1(1): 23.Bibcode:2022CliAc...1...23F.doi:10.1007/s44168-022-00022-5.
  7. ^ab"Ecovillages as an ecological alternative".Iberdrola.Retrieved2020-08-21.
  8. ^Van Schyndel Kasper, D. (2008)."Redefining Community in the Ecovillage."Human Ecology Review15:12–24. Retrieved on July 28, 2018.
  9. ^Ergas, Christina (1 March 2010)."A Model of Sustainable Living: Collective Identity in an Urban Ecovillage".Organization & Environment.23(1): 32–54.doi:10.1177/1086026609360324.ISSN1086-0266.S2CID144630214.Retrieved10 November2021.
  10. ^Kirby, Andy (1 September 2003)."Redefining social and environmental relations at the ecovillage at Ithaca: A case study".Journal of Environmental Psychology.23(3): 323–332.doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00025-2.ISSN0272-4944.Retrieved10 November2021.
  11. ^Beck, Rachel; Ormsby, Alison (2016)."A Case Study Analysis of Dancing Rabbit Ecovillage, Missouri - ProQuest".ProQuest.Retrieved10 November2021.
  12. ^Gilman, Robert (Summer, 1991)."The Eco-village Challenge"Archived2004-12-13 at theWayback Machine.In Context.Retrieved on: 2008-04-09.
  13. ^Fischetti, Diana Michelle (September 2008).Building Resistance from Home: EcoVillage at Ithaca as a Model of Sustainable Living(Thesis). University of Oregon.Retrieved10 November2021.
  14. ^Joubert, Kosha Anja (2016)."Overcoming Apartheid – the Global Ecovillage Network - ProQuest".ProQuest:10–12.Retrieved10 November2021.
  15. ^"About GEN - The Global Ecovillage Network (GEN) bridges countries, cultures, and communities!".Global Ecovillage Network.13 April 2015.Retrieved10 November2021.
  16. ^Singh, Bijay; Keitsch, Martina M.; Shrestha, Mahesh (2019)."Scaling up sustainability: Concepts and practices of the ecovillage approach".Sustainable Development.27(2): 237–244.doi:10.1002/sd.1882.hdl:11250/2626781.ISSN1099-1719.S2CID159366736.Retrieved10 November2021.
  17. ^"Concepts".Global Ecovillage Network.Retrieved2024-05-15.
  18. ^George Ramsey, "Passive Energy Applications for the Built Environment", First World Energy Conference, Association of Energy Engineers, published inEnergy Engineering Technology: Proceedings of the First World Energy Engineering Congress,October 31-November 2, 1978 in Atlanta, Ga. (Fairmont Press, 1979), pp. 220–242. For the term "eco-village" itself, see pp. 229 and 239.http:// villagehabitat /resources/papers/passive_energy.pdfArchived2013-12-19 at theWayback Machine
  19. ^"Passive Energy Applications for the Built Environment", p. 230.
  20. ^abJackson, Ross (Summer, 2004)."The Ecovillage Movement."Permaculture Magazine40.Retrieved on: 2011-08-11.
  21. ^"Ecovillages Archive".Global Ecovillage Network.Retrieved2024-05-15.
  22. ^"The Ecovillage Impact Assessment".Global Ecovillage Network.Retrieved2024-05-15.
  23. ^"Sustainable Living Community | Dancing Rabbit Ecovillage".dancingrabbit.org.
  24. ^Rubin, Zach (2021).""We Do This at Dancing Rabbit": Recruitment and Collective Identity Processes in the Ecovillage ".Journal of Contemporary Ethnography.50(4): 443–465.doi:10.1177/0891241621994651.ISSN0891-2416.
  25. ^"Dancing Rabbit Ecovillage".Global Ecovillage Network.5 June 2014.
  26. ^"Our Story".Cloughjordan Ecovillage.
  27. ^"Cloughjordan Ecovillage".Global Ecovillage Network.
  28. ^abKirby, Peadar (2020), Robbins, David; Torney, Diarmuid; Brereton, Pat (eds.),"Cloughjordan Ecovillage: Community-Led Transitioning to a Low-Carbon Future",Ireland and the Climate Crisis,Palgrave Studies in Media and Environmental Communication, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 287–303,doi:10.1007/978-3-030-47587-1_16,ISBN978-3-030-47587-1
  29. ^Carragher, Vincent; Peters, Michael (2018-08-03)."Engaging an ecovillage and measuring its ecological footprint".Local Environment.23(8): 861–878.Bibcode:2018LoEnv..23..861C.doi:10.1080/13549839.2018.1481021.ISSN1354-9839.
  30. ^Toros, Tulu (2011)."Ecological and Sustainable Urban Design: Eco-Villages, Eco-Districts, and Eco-Cities [2011]".Academia.
  31. ^Ergas, Christina (February 16, 2010)."A Model of Sustainable Living: Collective Identity in an Urban Ecovillage".Organization & Environment.23(1): 32–54.doi:10.1177/1086026609360324.ISSN1086-0266.
  32. ^Mychajluk, Lisa (2017-10-09)."Learning to live and work together in an ecovillage community of practice".European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults.8(2): 179–194.doi:10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela9092.ISSN2000-7426.
  33. ^"Living Greener – Ecovillage at Ithaca".Retrieved2023-03-26.
  34. ^"The Significance of the Global Ecovillage Movement".Archived fromthe originalon 2013-05-12.Retrieved2014-01-23.Ted Traineron ecovillages.
  35. ^Holmgren, David."The Essence of Permaculture."Retrieved on: 2013-07-31
  36. ^Sherry, Jesse (2019-11-10)."The impact of community sustainability: A life cycle assessment of three ecovillages".Journal of Cleaner Production.237:117830.Bibcode:2019JCPro.23717830S.doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117830.ISSN0959-6526.
  37. ^abVan Schyndel Kasper, Debbie (2008)."Redefining Community in the Ecovillage".Human Ecology Review.15(1): 12–24.ISSN1074-4827.JSTOR24707480.
  38. ^abCunningham, Paul A.; Wearing, Stephen L. (2013-08-05)."Does consensus work? A case study of the Cloughjordan ecovillage, Ireland".Cosmopolitan Civil Societies.5(2): 1–28.doi:10.5130/ccs.v5i2.3283.hdl:10453/122823.ISSN1837-5391.
  39. ^abEsteves, Ana Margarida (March 2017)."Radical Environmentalism and" Commoning ": Synergies Between Ecosystem Regeneration and Social Governance at Tamera Ecovillage, Portugal: Radical Environmentalism and" Commoning "".Antipode.49(2): 357–376.doi:10.1111/anti.12278.hdl:10071/14998.
  40. ^"Ecovillage Transition in Action".Global Ecovillage Network.
  41. ^abSiqueira, Gabriel (2019-12-23)."Starting an Ecovillage with Few Resources".Global Ecovillage Network.
  42. ^Bayulken, Bogachan; Huisingh, Donald (2015-07-01)."Perceived 'Quality of Life' in eco-developments and in conventional residential settings: an explorative study".Journal of Cleaner Production.Special Volume: Support your future today! Turn environmental challenges into opportunities.98:253–262.Bibcode:2015JCPro..98..253B.doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.096.ISSN0959-6526.

Kellogg, W. Keating, W. (2011), "Cleveland's Ecovillage: green and affordable housing through a network alliance", Housing Policy Debate, 21 (1), pp. 69–91

Cunningham, Paul A. and Wearing, Stephen L.(2013).The Politics of Consensus: An Exploration of the Cloughjordan Ecovillage, Ireland.[electronic version]. Cosmopolitan Civil Societies. 5(2) pp. 1–28

Further reading

edit
Books
edit