Wikipedia

Gravity

(Redirected fromForce of gravity)
For other uses, seeGravity (disambiguation).

"Gravitation" and "Law of Gravity" redirect here. For other uses, seeGravitation (disambiguation)andLaw of Gravity (disambiguation).

In physics,gravity(fromLatingravitas'weight'[1]) is afundamental interactionprimarily observed as mutual attraction between all things that havemass.Gravity is, by far, the weakest of the four fundamental interactions, approximately 1038times weaker than thestrong interaction,1036times weaker than theelectromagnetic forceand 1029times weaker than theweak interaction.As a result, it has no significant influence at the level ofsubatomic particles.[2]However, gravity is the most significant interaction between objects at themacroscopic scale,and it determines the motion ofplanets,stars,galaxies,and evenlight.

The shapes of two massivegalaxiesin the photo are distorted due to gravity.

On Earth,gravity givesweighttophysical objects,and theMoon's gravityis responsible for sublunartidesin the oceans. The corresponding antipodal tide is caused by the inertia of the Earth and Moon orbiting one another. Gravity also has many important biological functions, helping to guide the growth of plants through the process ofgravitropismand influencing thecirculationof fluids inmulticellular organisms.

The gravitational attraction between the original gaseous matter in theuniversecaused it tocoalesceandform starswhich eventually condensed into galaxies, so gravity is responsible for many of the large-scale structures in the universe. Gravity has an infinite range, although its effects become weaker as objects get farther away.

Gravity is most accurately described by thegeneral theory of relativity,proposed byAlbert Einsteinin 1915, which describes gravity not as a force, but as thecurvatureofspacetime,caused by the uneven distribution of mass, and causing masses to move alonggeodesiclines. The most extreme example of this curvature of spacetime is ablack hole,from which nothing—not even light—can escape once past the black hole'sevent horizon.[3]However, for most applications, gravity is well approximated byNewton's law of universal gravitation,which describes gravity as aforcecausing any two bodies to be attracted toward each other, with magnitudeproportionalto the product of their masses andinversely proportionalto thesquareof thedistancebetween them.

Current models ofparticle physicsimply that the earliest instance of gravity in the universe, possibly in the form ofquantum gravity,supergravityor agravitational singularity,along with ordinaryspaceandtime,developed during thePlanck epoch(up to 10−43seconds after thebirthof the universe), possibly from a primeval state, such as afalse vacuum,quantum vacuumorvirtual particle,in a currently unknown manner.[4]Scientists are currently working to develop a theory of gravity consistent withquantum mechanics,a quantum gravity theory,[5]which would allow gravity to be united in a common mathematical framework (atheory of everything) with the other three fundamental interactions of physics.

Definitions

Gravitation,also known as gravitational attraction, is the mutual attraction between all masses in the universe. Gravity is the gravitational attraction at the surface of a planet or other celestial body;[6]gravity may also include, in addition to gravitation, thecentrifugal forceresulting from the planet's rotation(see§ Earth's gravity).[7]

History

Main article:History of gravitational theory

Ancient world

The nature and mechanism of gravity were explored by a wide range of ancient scholars. InGreece,Aristotlebelieved that objects fell towards the Earth because the Earth was the center of the Universe and attracted all of the mass in the Universe towards it. He also thought that the speed of a falling object should increase with its weight, a conclusion that was later shown to be false.[8]While Aristotle's view was widely accepted throughout Ancient Greece, there were other thinkers such asPlutarchwho correctly predicted that the attraction of gravity was not unique to the Earth.[9]

Although he did not understand gravity as a force, the ancient Greek philosopherArchimedesdiscovered thecenter of gravityof a triangle.[10]He postulated that if two equal weights did not have the same center of gravity, the center of gravity of the two weights together would be in the middle of the line that joins their centers of gravity.[11]Two centuries later, the Roman engineer and architect Vitruvius contended in hisDe architecturathat gravity is not dependent on a substance's weight but rather on its "nature".[12] In the 6th century CE, the Byzantine Alexandrian scholar John Philoponus proposed the theory of impetus, which modifies Aristotle's theory that "continuation of motion depends on continued action of a force" by incorporating a causative force that diminishes over time.[13]

In 628 CE, theIndianmathematician and astronomerBrahmaguptaproposed the idea that gravity is an attractive force that draws objects to the Earth and used the termgurutvākarṣaṇto describe it.[14]: 105 [15][16]

In the ancientMiddle East,gravity was a topic of fierce debate. ThePersianintellectualAl-Birunibelieved that the force of gravity was not unique to the Earth, and he correctly assumed that otherheavenly bodiesshould exert a gravitational attraction as well.[17]In contrast,Al-Khaziniheld the same position as Aristotle that all matter in the Universe is attracted to the center of the Earth.[18]

TheLeaning Tower of Pisa,where according to legend Galileo performed an experiment about the speed of falling objects

Scientific revolution

Main article:Scientific revolution

In the mid-16th century, various European scientists experimentally disproved theAristoteliannotion that heavier objectsfallat a faster rate.[19]In particular, theSpanishDominican priestDomingo de Sotowrote in 1551 that bodies infree falluniformly accelerate.[19]De Soto may have been influenced by earlier experiments conducted by otherDominicanpriests in Italy, including those byBenedetto Varchi,Francesco Beato,Luca Ghini,andGiovan Bellasowhich contradicted Aristotle's teachings on the fall of bodies.[19]

The mid-16th century Italian physicistGiambattista Benedettipublished papers claiming that, due tospecific gravity,objects made of the same material but with different masses would fall at the same speed.[20]With the 1586Delft tower experiment,theFlemishphysicistSimon Stevinobserved that two cannonballs of differing sizes and weights fell at the same rate when dropped from a tower.[21]In the late 16th century,Galileo Galilei's careful measurements of balls rolling downinclinesallowed him to firmly establish that gravitational acceleration is the same for all objects.[22]Galileo postulated thatair resistanceis the reason that objects with a low density and highsurface areafall more slowly in an atmosphere.

In 1604, Galileo correctly hypothesized that the distance of a falling object is proportional to thesquareof the time elapsed.[23]This was later confirmed by Italian scientistsJesuitsGrimaldiandRicciolibetween 1640 and 1650. They also calculated the magnitude ofthe Earth's gravityby measuring the oscillations of a pendulum.[24]

Newton's theory of gravitation

Main articles:Newton's law of universal gravitationandNewton-Hooke priority controversy for the inverse square law

In 1657,Robert Hookepublished hisMicrographia,in which he hypothesised that the Moon must have its own gravity.[25]In 1666, he added two further principles: that all bodies move in straight lines until deflected by some force and that the attractive force is stronger for closer bodies. In a communication to the Royal Society in 1666, Hooke wrote[26]

I will explain a system of the world very different from any yet received. It is founded on the following positions. 1. That all the heavenly bodies have not only a gravitation of their parts to their own proper centre, but that they also mutually attract each other within their spheres of action. 2. That all bodies having a simple motion, will continue to move in a straight line, unless continually deflected from it by some extraneous force, causing them to describe a circle, an ellipse, or some other curve. 3. That this attraction is so much the greater as the bodies are nearer. As to the proportion in which those forces diminish by an increase of distance, I own I have not discovered it....

Hooke's 1674 Gresham lecture,An Attempt to prove the Annual Motion of the Earth,explained that gravitation applied to "all celestial bodies"[27]

English physicist and mathematician, SirIsaac Newton(1642–1727)

In 1684, Newton sent a manuscript toEdmond HalleytitledDe motu corporum in gyrum('On the motion of bodies in an orbit'),which provided a physical justification forKepler's laws of planetary motion.[28]Halley was impressed by the manuscript and urged Newton to expand on it, and a few years later Newton published a groundbreaking book calledPhilosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica(Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy). In this book, Newton described gravitation as a universal force, and claimed that "the forces which keep the planets in their orbs must [be] reciprocally as the squares of their distances from the centers about which they revolve." This statement was later condensed into the following inverse-square law:

whereFis the force,m1andm2are the masses of the objects interacting,ris the distance between the centers of the masses andGis thegravitational constant6.674×10−11m3⋅kg−1⋅s−2.[29]

Newton'sPrincipiawas well received by the scientific community, and his law of gravitation quickly spread across the European world.[30]More than a century later, in 1821, his theory of gravitation rose to even greater prominence when it was used to predict the existence ofNeptune.In that year, the French astronomerAlexis Bouvardused this theory to create a table modeling the orbit ofUranus,which was shown to differ significantly from the planet's actual trajectory. In order to explain this discrepancy, many astronomers speculated that there might be a large object beyond the orbit of Uranus which was disrupting its orbit. In 1846, the astronomersJohn Couch AdamsandUrbain Le Verrierindependently used Newton's law to predict Neptune's location in the night sky, and the planet was discovered there within a day.[31]

General relativity

See also:Introduction to general relativity

Eventually, astronomers noticed an eccentricity in the orbit of the planetMercurywhich could not be explained by Newton's theory: theperihelionof the orbit was increasing by about 42.98arcsecondsper century. The most obvious explanation for this discrepancy was an as-yet-undiscovered celestial body, such as a planet orbiting the Sun even closer than Mercury, but all efforts to find such a body turned out to be fruitless. In 1915,Albert Einsteindeveloped a theory ofgeneral relativitywhich was able to accurately model Mercury's orbit.[32]

In general relativity, the effects of gravitation are ascribed to spacetimecurvatureinstead of a force. Einstein began to toy with this idea in the form of theequivalence principle,a discovery which he later described as "the happiest thought of my life."[33]In this theory, free fall is considered to be equivalent to inertial motion, meaning that free-falling inertial objects are accelerated relative to non-inertial observers on the ground.[34][35]In contrast toNewtonian physics,Einstein believed that it was possible for this acceleration to occur without any force being applied to the object.

Einstein proposed thatspacetimeis curved by matter, and that free-falling objects are moving along locally straight paths in curved spacetime. These straight paths are calledgeodesics.As in Newton's first law of motion, Einstein believed that a force applied to an object would cause it to deviate from a geodesic. For instance, people standing on the surface of the Earth are prevented from following a geodesic path because the mechanical resistance of the Earth exerts an upward force on them. This explains why moving along the geodesics in spacetime is considered inertial.

Einstein's description of gravity was quickly accepted by the majority of physicists, as it was able to explain a wide variety of previously baffling experimental results.[36]In the coming years, a wide range of experiments provided additional support for the idea of general relativity.[37]: p.1-9 [38][39][40][41]Today, Einstein's theory of relativity is used for all gravitational calculations where absolute precision is desired, although Newton's inverse-square law is accurate enough for virtually all ordinary calculations.[37]: p.79 [42]

Modern research

Inmodern physics,general relativity remains the framework for the understanding of gravity.[43]Physicists continue to work to findsolutionsto theEinstein field equationsthat form the basis of general relativity and continue to test the theory, finding excellent agreement in all cases.[44][45][37]: p.9 

Einstein field equations

The Einstein field equations are asystemof 10partial differential equationswhich describe how matter affects the curvature of spacetime. The system is often expressed in the form whereGμνis theEinstein tensor,gμνis themetric tensor,Tμνis thestress–energy tensor,Λis thecosmological constant,is the Newtonian constant of gravitation andis thespeed of light.[46]The constantis referred to as the Einstein gravitational constant.[47]

An illustration of theSchwarzschild metric,which describes spacetime around a spherical, uncharged, and nonrotating object with mass

A major area of research is the discovery ofexact solutionsto the Einstein field equations. Solving these equations amounts to calculating a precise value for the metric tensor (which defines the curvature and geometry of spacetime) under certain physical conditions. There is no formal definition for what constitutes such solutions, but most scientists agree that they should be expressable usingelementary functionsorlinear differential equations.[48]Some of the most notable solutions of the equations include:

Today, there remain many important situations in which the Einstein field equations have not been solved. Chief among these is thetwo-body problem,which concerns the geometry of spacetime around two mutually interacting massive objects, such as the Sun and the Earth, or the two stars in abinary star system.The situation gets even more complicated when considering the interactions of three or more massive bodies (the "n-body problem "), and some scientists suspect that the Einstein field equations will never be solved in this context.[57]However, it is still possible to construct an approximate solution to the field equations in then-body problem by using the technique ofpost-Newtonian expansion.[58]In general, the extreme nonlinearity of the Einstein field equations makes it difficult to solve them in all but the most specific cases.[59]

Gravity and quantum mechanics

Main articles:GravitonandQuantum gravity

Despite its success in predicting the effects of gravity at large scales, general relativity is ultimately incompatible withquantum mechanics.This is because general relativity describes gravity as a smooth, continuous distortion of spacetime, while quantum mechanics holds that all forces arise from the exchange of discrete particles known asquanta.This contradiction is especially ve xing to physicists because the other three fundamental forces (strong force, weak force and electromagnetism) were reconciled with a quantum framework decades ago.[60]As a result, modern researchers have begun to search for a theory that could unite both gravity and quantum mechanics under a more general framework.[61]

One path is to describe gravity in the framework ofquantum field theory,which has been successful to accurately describe the otherfundamental interactions.The electromagnetic force arises from an exchange of virtualphotons,where the QFT description of gravity is that there is an exchange ofvirtualgravitons.[62][63]This description reproduces general relativity in theclassical limit.However, this approach fails at short distances of the order of thePlanck length,[64]where a more complete theory ofquantum gravity(or a new approach to quantum mechanics) is required.

Tests of general relativity

Main article:Tests of general relativity
The 1919total solar eclipseprovided one of the first opportunities to test the predictions of general relativity.

Testing the predictions of general relativity has historically been difficult, because they are almost identical to the predictions of Newtonian gravity for small energies and masses.[65]Still, since its development, an ongoing series of experimental results have provided support for the theory:[65]In 1919, the British astrophysicistArthur Eddingtonwas able to confirm the predictedgravitational lensingof light duringthat year's solar eclipse.[66][67]Eddington measured starlight deflections twice those predicted by Newtonian corpuscular theory, in accordance with the predictions of general relativity. Although Eddington's analysis was later disputed, this experiment made Einstein famous almost overnight and caused general relativity to become widely accepted in the scientific community.[68]

In 1959, American physicistsRobert PoundandGlen Rebkaperformedan experimentin which they usedgamma raysto confirm the prediction ofgravitational time dilation.By sending the rays down a 74-foot tower and measuring their frequency at the bottom, the scientists confirmed that light isredshiftedas it moves towards a source of gravity. The observed redshift also supported the idea that time runs more slowly in the presence of a gravitational field.[69]Thetime delay of lightpassing close to a massive object was first identified byIrwin I. Shapiroin 1964 in interplanetary spacecraft signals.[70]

In 1971, scientists discovered the first-ever black hole in the galaxyCygnus.The black hole was detected because it was emitting bursts ofx-raysas it consumed a smaller star, and it came to be known asCygnus X-1.[71]This discovery confirmed yet another prediction of general relativity, because Einstein's equations implied that light could not escape from a sufficiently large and compact object.[72]

General relativity states that gravity acts on light and matter equally, meaning that a sufficiently massive object could warp light around it and create agravitational lens.This phenomenon was first confirmed by observation in 1979 using the 2.1 meter telescope atKitt Peak National Observatoryin Arizona, which saw two mirror images of the same quasar whose light had been bent around the galaxyYGKOW G1.[73][74]

Frame dragging,the idea that a rotating massive object should twist spacetime around it, was confirmed byGravity Probe Bresults in 2011.[75][76]In 2015, theLIGOobservatory detected faintgravitational waves,the existence of which had been predicted by general relativity. Scientists believe that the waves emanated from ablack hole mergerthat occurred 1.5 billionlight-yearsaway.[77]

Specifics

Earth's gravity

An initially-stationary object that is allowed to fall freely under gravity drops a distance that is proportional to the square of the elapsed time. This image spans half a second and was captured at 20 flashes per second.
Main article:Gravity of Earth

Every planetary body (including the Earth) is surrounded by its own gravitational field, which can be conceptualized with Newtonian physics as exerting an attractive force on all objects. Assuming a spherically symmetrical planet, the strength of this field at any given point above the surface is proportional to the planetary body's mass and inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the center of the body.

If an object with comparable mass to that of the Earth were to fall towards it, then the corresponding acceleration of the Earth would be observable.

The strength of the gravitational field is numerically equal to the acceleration of objects under its influence.[78]The rate of acceleration of falling objects near the Earth's surface varies very slightly depending on latitude, surface features such as mountains and ridges, and perhaps unusually high or low sub-surface densities.[79]For purposes of weights and measures, astandard gravityvalue is defined by theInternational Bureau of Weights and Measures,under theInternational System of Units(SI).

The force of gravity on Earth is the resultant (vector sum) of two forces:[7](a) The gravitational attraction in accordance with Newton's universal law of gravitation, and (b) the centrifugal force, which results from the choice of an earthbound, rotating frame of reference. The force of gravity is weakest at the equator because of thecentrifugal forcecaused by the Earth's rotation and because points on the equator are furthest from the center of the Earth. The force of gravity varies with latitude and increases from about 9.780 m/s2at the Equator to about 9.832 m/s2at the poles.[80][81]

Gravitational radiation

TheLIGOHanford Observatory located in Washington, United States, where gravitational waves were first observed in September 2015
Main article:Gravitational wave

General relativity predicts that energy can be transported out of a system through gravitational radiation. The first indirect evidence for gravitational radiation was through measurements of theHulse–Taylor binaryin 1973. This system consists of a pulsar and neutron star in orbit around one another. Its orbital period has decreased since its initial discovery due to a loss of energy, which is consistent for the amount of energy loss due to gravitational radiation. This research was awarded theNobel Prize in Physicsin 1993.[82]

The first direct evidence for gravitational radiation was measured on 14 September 2015 by theLIGOdetectors. The gravitational waves emitted during the collision of two black holes 1.3 billion light years from Earth were measured.[83][84]This observation confirms the theoretical predictions of Einstein and others that such waves exist. It also opens the way for practical observation and understanding of the nature of gravity and events in the Universe including the Big Bang.[85]Neutron starandblack holeformation also create detectable amounts of gravitational radiation.[86]This research was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2017.[87]

Speed of gravity

Main article:Speed of gravity

In December 2012, a research team in China announced that it had produced measurements of the phase lag ofEarth tidesduring full and new moons which seem to prove that the speed of gravity is equal to the speed of light.[88]This means that if the Sun suddenly disappeared, the Earth would keep orbiting the vacant point normally for 8 minutes, which is the time light takes to travel that distance. The team's findings were released inScience Bulletinin February 2013.[89]

In October 2017, theLIGOand Virgo detectors received gravitational wave signals within 2 seconds of gamma ray satellites and optical telescopes seeing signals from the same direction. This confirmed that the speed of gravitational waves was the same as the speed of light.[90]

Anomalies and discrepancies

Not to be confused withGravity anomaly.

There are some observations that are not adequately accounted for, which may point to the need for better theories of gravity or perhaps be explained in other ways.

Rotation curve of a typical spiral galaxy: predicted (A) and observed (B). The discrepancy between the curves is attributed todark matter.

Alternative theories

Main article:Alternatives to general relativity

Historical alternative theories

Modern alternative theories

See also

References

  1. ^"dict.cc dictionary:: gravitas:: English-Latin translation".Archivedfrom the original on 13 August 2021.Retrieved11 September2018.
  2. ^Krebs, Robert E. (1999).Scientific Development and Misconceptions Through the Ages: A Reference Guide(illustrated ed.). Greenwood Publishing Group. p.133.ISBN978-0-313-30226-8.
  3. ^"HubbleSite: Black Holes: Gravity's Relentless Pull".hubblesite.org.Archivedfrom the original on 26 December 2018.Retrieved7 October2016.
  4. ^Staff."Birth of the Universe".University of Oregon.Archivedfrom the original on 28 November 2018.Retrieved24 September2016.– discusses "Planck time"and"Planck era"at thevery beginningof the Universe
  5. ^Overbye, Dennis(10 October 2022)."Black Holes May Hide a Mind-Bending Secret About Our Universe - Take gravity, add quantum mechanics, stir. What do you get? Just maybe, a holographic cosmos".The New York Times.Archivedfrom the original on 16 November 2022.Retrieved10 October2022.
  6. ^McGraw-Hill Dict (1989)
  7. ^abHofmann-Wellenhof, B.; Moritz, H. (2006).Physical Geodesy(2nd ed.). Springer.ISBN978-3-211-33544-4.§ 2.1: "The total force acting on a body at rest on the earth's surface is the resultant of gravitational force and the centrifugal force of the earth's rotation and is called gravity.
  8. ^Cappi, Alberto."The concept of gravity before Newton"(PDF).Culture and Cosmos.Archived(PDF)from the original on 9 October 2022.
  9. ^Bakker, Frederik; Palmerino, Carla Rita (1 June 2020)."Motion to the Center or Motion to the Whole? Plutarch's Views on Gravity and Their Influence on Galileo".Isis.111(2): 217–238.doi:10.1086/709138.hdl:2066/219256.ISSN0021-1753.S2CID219925047.Archivedfrom the original on 2 May 2022.Retrieved2 May2022.
  10. ^Reviel Neitz; William Noel (13 October 2011).The Archimedes Codex: Revealing The Secrets of the World's Greatest Palimpsest.Hachette UK. p. 125.ISBN978-1-78022-198-4.Archivedfrom the original on 7 January 2020.Retrieved10 April2019.
  11. ^CJ Tuplin, Lewis Wolpert (2002).Science and Mathematics in Ancient Greek Culture.Hachette UK. p. xi.ISBN978-0-19-815248-4.Archivedfrom the original on 17 January 2020.Retrieved10 April2019.
  12. ^Vitruvius, Marcus Pollio(1914)."7".In Alfred A. Howard (ed.).De Architectura libri decem[Ten Books on Architecture]. Herbert Langford Warren, Nelson Robinson (illus), Morris Hicky Morgan. Harvard University, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. p. 215.Archivedfrom the original on 13 October 2016.Retrieved10 April2019.
  13. ^Philoponus' term for impetus is "ἑνέργεια ἀσώματος κινητική" ( "incorporeal motiveenérgeia"); seeCAGXVII,Ioannis Philoponi in Aristotelis Physicorum Libros Quinque Posteriores CommentariaArchived22 December 2023 at theWayback Machine,Walter de Gruyter,1888, p. 642: "λέγω δὴ ὅτι ἑνέργειά τις ἀσώματος κινητικὴ ἑνδίδοται ὑπὸ τοῦ ῥιπτοῦντος τῷ ῥιπτουμένῳ [I say that impetus (incorporeal motive energy) is transferred from the thrower to the thrown]."
  14. ^Pickover, Clifford (16 April 2008).Archimedes to Hawking: Laws of Science and the Great Minds Behind Them.Oxford University Press.ISBN9780199792689.Archivedfrom the original on 18 January 2017.Retrieved29 August2017.
  15. ^Bose, Mainak Kumar (1988).Late classical India.A. Mukherjee & Co.Archivedfrom the original on 13 August 2021.Retrieved28 July2021.
  16. ^Sen, Amartya (2005).The Argumentative Indian.Allen Lane. p. 29.ISBN978-0-7139-9687-6.
  17. ^Starr, S. Frederick (2015).Lost Enlightenment: Central Asia's Golden Age from the Arab Conquest to Tamerlane.Princeton University Press. p. 260.ISBN9780691165851.
  18. ^Rozhanskaya, Mariam; Levinova, I. S. (1996). "Statics". In Rushdī, Rāshid (ed.).Encyclopedia of the History of Arabic Science.Vol. 2. Psychology Press. pp. 614–642.ISBN9780415124119.
  19. ^abcWallace, William A. (2018) [2004].Domingo de Soto and the Early Galileo: Essays on Intellectual History.Abingdon, UK:Routledge.pp. 119, 121–22.ISBN978-1-351-15959-3.Archivedfrom the original on 16 June 2021.Retrieved4 August2021.
  20. ^Drabkin, I. E. (1963). "Two Versions of G. B. Benedetti's Demonstratio Proportionum Motuum Localium".Isis.54(2): 259–262.doi:10.1086/349706.ISSN0021-1753.JSTOR228543.S2CID144883728.
  21. ^Schilling, Govert (31 July 2017).Ripples in Spacetime: Einstein, Gravitational Waves, and the Future of Astronomy.Harvard University Press. p. 26.ISBN9780674971660.Archivedfrom the original on 16 December 2021.Retrieved16 December2021.
  22. ^Galileo(1638),Two New Sciences,First Day Salviati speaks: "If this were what Aristotle meant you would burden him with another error which would amount to a falsehood; because, since there is no such sheer height available on earth, it is clear that Aristotle could not have made the experiment; yet he wishes to give us the impression of his having performed it when he speaks of such an effect as one which we see."
  23. ^Gillispie, Charles Coulston(1960).The Edge of Objectivity: An Essay in the History of Scientific Ideas.Princeton University Press. pp. 3–6.ISBN0-691-02350-6.
  24. ^J.L. Heilbron,Electricity in the 17th and 18th Centuries: A Study of Early Modern Physics(Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979), 180.
  25. ^Gribbin & Gribbin (2017),p. 57.
  26. ^Stewart, Dugald(1816).Elements of the Philosophy of the Human Mind.Vol. 2. Edinburgh; London: Constable & Co; Cadell & Davies. p.434.
  27. ^Hooke (1679),An Attempt to prove the Annual Motion of the Earth,page 2, 3.
  28. ^Sagan, Carl&Druyan, Ann(1997).Comet.New York: Random House. pp. 52–58.ISBN978-0-3078-0105-0.Archivedfrom the original on 15 June 2021.Retrieved5 August2021.
  29. ^"2022 CODATA Value: Newtonian constant of gravitation".The NIST Reference on Constants, Units, and Uncertainty.NIST.May 2024.Retrieved18 May2024.
  30. ^"The Reception of Newton's Principia"(PDF).Archived(PDF)from the original on 9 October 2022.Retrieved6 May2022.
  31. ^"This Month in Physics History".aps.org.Archivedfrom the original on 6 May 2022.Retrieved6 May2022.
  32. ^Nobil, Anna M. (March 1986). "The real value of Mercury's perihelion advance".Nature.320(6057): 39–41.Bibcode:1986Natur.320...39N.doi:10.1038/320039a0.ISSN0028-0836.S2CID4325839.
  33. ^Webb, Joh; Dougan, Darren (23 November 2015)."Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity".Archivedfrom the original on 21 May 2022.Retrieved21 May2022.
  34. ^"Gravity and Warped Spacetime".black-holes.org. Archived fromthe originalon 21 June 2011.Retrieved16 October2010.
  35. ^Dmitri Pogosyan."Lecture 20: Black Holes – The Einstein Equivalence Principle".University of Alberta.Archivedfrom the original on 8 September 2013.Retrieved14 October2011.
  36. ^Brush, S. G. (1 January 1999)."Why was Relativity Accepted?".Physics in Perspective.1(2): 184–214.Bibcode:1999PhP.....1..184B.doi:10.1007/s000160050015.ISSN1422-6944.S2CID51825180.Archivedfrom the original on 8 April 2023.Retrieved22 May2022.
  37. ^abcWill, Clifford M. (2018).Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics.Cambridge Univ. Press.ISBN9781107117440.
  38. ^Lindley, David (12 July 2005)."The Weight of Light".Physics.16.Archivedfrom the original on 25 May 2022.Retrieved22 May2022.
  39. ^"Hafele-Keating Experiment".hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu.Archivedfrom the original on 18 April 2017.Retrieved22 May2022.
  40. ^"How the 1919 Solar Eclipse Made Einstein the World's Most Famous Scientist".Discover Magazine.Archivedfrom the original on 22 May 2022.Retrieved22 May2022.
  41. ^"At Long Last, Gravity Probe B Satellite Proves Einstein Right".science.org.Archivedfrom the original on 22 May 2022.Retrieved22 May2022.
  42. ^Hassani, Sadri (2010).From Atoms to Galaxies: A conceptual physics approach to scientific awareness.CRC Press. p. 131.ISBN9781439808504.
  43. ^Stephani, Hans (2003).Exact Solutions to Einstein's Field Equations.Cambridge University Press. p. 1.ISBN978-0-521-46136-8.
  44. ^"Einstein's general relativity theory is questioned but still stands for now".Science News.Science Daily. 25 July 2019.Retrieved11 August2024.
  45. ^Lea, Robert (15 September 2022)."Einstein's greatest theory just passed its most rigorous test yet".Scientific American.Springer Nature America, Inc.Retrieved11 August2024.
  46. ^"Einstein Field Equations (General Relativity)".University of Warwick.Archivedfrom the original on 25 May 2022.Retrieved24 May2022.
  47. ^"How to understand Einstein's equation for general relativity".Big Think.15 September 2021.Archivedfrom the original on 26 May 2022.Retrieved24 May2022.
  48. ^Ishak, Mustafa."Exact Solutions to Einstein's Equations in Astrophysics"(PDF).University of Texas at Dallas.Archived(PDF)from the original on 9 October 2022.Retrieved25 May2022.
  49. ^"The Schwarzchild Metric and Applications"(PDF).p. 36.Archived(PDF)from the original on 9 October 2022.Retrieved26 May2022.
  50. ^Ehlers, Jurgen (1997)."Examples of Newtonian limits of relativistic spacetimes".Classical Quantum Gravity.14(1A): 122–123.Bibcode:1997CQGra..14A.119E.doi:10.1088/0264-9381/14/1A/010.hdl:11858/00-001M-0000-0013-5AC5-F.S2CID250804865.Archivedfrom the original on 6 December 2022.Retrieved27 May2022.
  51. ^"Surprise: the Big Bang isn't the beginning of the universe anymore".Big Think.13 October 2021.Archivedfrom the original on 26 May 2022.Retrieved26 May2022.
  52. ^Norebo, Jonatan (16 March 2016)."The Reissner-Nordström metric"(PDF).Archived(PDF)from the original on 9 October 2022.
  53. ^Teukolsky, Saul (1 June 2015)."The Kerr metric"(PDF).Classical and Quantum Gravity.32(12): 124006.arXiv:1410.2130.Bibcode:2015CQGra..32l4006T.doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/12/124006.S2CID119219499.Archived(PDF)from the original on 9 October 2022.
  54. ^Newman, E. T.; Couch, E.; Chinnapared, K.; Exton, A.; Prakash, A.; Torrence, R. (June 1965). "Metric of a Rotating, Charged Mass".Journal of Mathematical Physics.6(6): 918–919.Bibcode:1965JMP.....6..918N.doi:10.1063/1.1704351.ISSN0022-2488.S2CID122962090.
  55. ^Pettini, M."RELATIVISTIC COSMOLOGY"(PDF).Archived(PDF)from the original on 9 October 2022.Retrieved27 May2022.
  56. ^O’Raifeartaigh, Cormac; O’Keeffe, Michael (2017)."Einstein's 1917 Static Model of the Universe: A Centennial Review".The European Physical Journal H.42(3): 41.arXiv:1701.07261.Bibcode:2017EPJH...42..431O.doi:10.1140/epjh/e2017-80002-5.S2CID119461771.Archivedfrom the original on 29 May 2022.Retrieved29 May2022.
  57. ^Siegel, Ethan."This Is Why Scientists Will Never Exactly Solve General Relativity".Forbes.Archivedfrom the original on 27 May 2022.Retrieved27 May2022.
  58. ^Spyrou, N. (1 May 1975)."TheN-body problem in general relativity ".The Astrophysical Journal.197:725–743.Bibcode:1975ApJ...197..725S.doi:10.1086/153562.ISSN0004-637X.
  59. ^Sleator, Daniel (6 June 1996)."Hermeneutics of Classical General Relativity".Retrieved23 May2022.
  60. ^"Gravity Probe B – Special & General Relativity Questions and Answers".einstein.stanford.edu.Archivedfrom the original on 6 June 2022.Retrieved1 August2022.
  61. ^Huggett, Nick; Matsubara, Keizo; Wüthrich, Christian (2020).Beyond Spacetime: The Foundations of Quantum Gravity.Cambridge University Press.p. 6.ISBN9781108655705.
  62. ^Feynman, R.P.; Morinigo, F.B.; Wagner, W.G.; Hatfield, B. (1995).Feynman lectures on gravitation.Addison-Wesley.ISBN978-0-201-62734-3.
  63. ^Zee, A. (2003).Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell.Princeton University Press.ISBN978-0-691-01019-9.
  64. ^Randall, Lisa (2005).Warped Passages: Unraveling the Universe's Hidden Dimensions.Ecco.ISBN978-0-06-053108-9.
  65. ^ab"Testing General Relativity".NASA Blueshift.Archivedfrom the original on 16 May 2022.Retrieved29 May2022.
  66. ^Dyson, F.W.;Eddington, A.S.;Davidson, C.R. (1920)."A Determination of the Deflection of Light by the Sun's Gravitational Field, from Observations Made at the Total Eclipse of May 29, 1919".Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A.220(571–581): 291–333.Bibcode:1920RSPTA.220..291D.doi:10.1098/rsta.1920.0009.Archivedfrom the original on 15 May 2020.Retrieved1 July2019..Quote, p. 332: "Thus the results of the expeditions to Sobral and Principe can leave little doubt that a deflection of light takes place in the neighbourhood of the sun and that it is of the amount demanded by Einstein's generalised theory of relativity, as attributable to the sun's gravitational field."
  67. ^Weinberg, Steven(1972).Gravitation and cosmology.John Wiley & Sons.ISBN9780471925675..Quote, p. 192: "About a dozen stars in all were studied, and yielded values 1.98 ± 0.11" and 1.61 ± 0.31 ", in substantial agreement with Einstein's prediction θ☉= 1.75 "."
  68. ^Gilmore, Gerard; Tausch-Pebody, Gudrun (20 March 2022)."The 1919 eclipse results that verified general relativity and their later detractors: a story re-told".Notes and Records: The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science.76(1): 155–180.arXiv:2010.13744.doi:10.1098/rsnr.2020.0040.S2CID225075861.
  69. ^"General Astronomy Addendum 10: Graviational Redshift and time dilation".homepage.physics.uiowa.edu.Archivedfrom the original on 14 May 2022.Retrieved29 May2022.
  70. ^Asada, Hideki (20 March 2008)."Gravitational time delay of light for various models of modified gravity".Physics Letters B.661(2–3): 78–81.arXiv:0710.0477.Bibcode:2008PhLB..661...78A.doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.02.006.S2CID118365884.Archivedfrom the original on 29 May 2022.Retrieved29 May2022.
  71. ^"The Fate of the First Black Hole".science.org.Archivedfrom the original on 31 May 2022.Retrieved30 May2022.
  72. ^"Black Holes Science Mission Directorate".webarchive.library.unt.edu.Archivedfrom the original on 8 April 2023.Retrieved30 May2022.
  73. ^Subal Kar (2022).Physics and Astrophysics: Glimpses of the Progress(illustrated ed.). CRC Press. p. 106.ISBN978-1-000-55926-2.Extract of page 106
  74. ^"Hubble, Hubble, Seeing Double!".NASA.24 January 2014.Archivedfrom the original on 25 May 2022.Retrieved31 May2022.
  75. ^"NASA's Gravity Probe B Confirms Two Einstein Space-Time Theories".Nasa.gov.Archivedfrom the original on 22 May 2013.Retrieved23 July2013.
  76. ^""Frame-Dragging" in Local Spacetime "(PDF).Stanford University.Archived(PDF)from the original on 9 October 2022.
  77. ^"Gravitational Waves Detected 100 Years After Einstein's Prediction".LIGO Lab Caltech.Archivedfrom the original on 27 May 2019.Retrieved30 May2022.
  78. ^Cantor, G.N.; Christie, J.R.R.; Hodge, M.J.S.; Olby, R.C. (2006).Companion to the History of Modern Science.Routledge. p. 448.ISBN978-1-134-97751-2.Archivedfrom the original on 17 January 2020.Retrieved22 October2017.
  79. ^Nemiroff, R.; Bonnell, J., eds. (15 December 2014)."The Potsdam Gravity Potato".Astronomy Picture of the Day.NASA.
  80. ^Boynton, Richard (2001)."Precise Measurement of Mass"(PDF).Sawe Paper No. 3147.Arlington, Texas: S.A.W.E., Inc. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 27 February 2007.Retrieved22 December2023.
  81. ^"Curious About Astronomy?".Cornell University.Archived fromthe originalon 28 July 2013.Retrieved22 December2023.
  82. ^"The Nobel Prize in Physics 1993".Nobel Foundation.13 October 1993.Archivedfrom the original on 10 August 2018.Retrieved22 December2023.for the discovery of a new type of pulsar, a discovery that has opened up new possibilities for the study of gravitation
  83. ^Clark, Stuart (11 February 2016)."Gravitational waves: scientists announce 'we did it!' – live".the Guardian.Archivedfrom the original on 22 June 2018.Retrieved11 February2016.
  84. ^Castelvecchi, Davide; Witze, Witze (11 February 2016)."Einstein's gravitational waves found at last".Nature News.doi:10.1038/nature.2016.19361.S2CID182916902.Archivedfrom the original on 12 February 2016.Retrieved11 February2016.
  85. ^"WHAT ARE GRAVITATIONAL WAVES AND WHY DO THEY MATTER?".popsci. 13 January 2016.Archivedfrom the original on 3 February 2016.Retrieved12 February2016.
  86. ^Abbott, B. P.; et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration&Virgo Collaboration) (October 2017)."GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral"(PDF).Physical Review Letters.119(16): 161101.arXiv:1710.05832.Bibcode:2017PhRvL.119p1101A.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101.PMID29099225.Archived(PDF)from the original on 8 August 2018.Retrieved28 September2019.
  87. ^Devlin, Hanna (3 October 2017)."Nobel prize in physics awarded for discovery of gravitational waves".the Guardian.Archivedfrom the original on 3 October 2017.Retrieved3 October2017.
  88. ^Chinese scientists find evidence for speed of gravityArchived8 January 2013 at theWayback Machine,astrowatch, 12/28/12.
  89. ^TANG, Ke Yun; HUA ChangCai; WEN Wu; CHI ShunLiang; YOU QingYu; YU Dan (February 2013)."Observational evidences for the speed of the gravity based on the Earth tide".Chinese Science Bulletin.58(4–5): 474–477.Bibcode:2013ChSBu..58..474T.doi:10.1007/s11434-012-5603-3.
  90. ^"GW170817 Press Release".LIGO Lab – Caltech.Archivedfrom the original on 17 October 2017.Retrieved24 October2017.
  91. ^"The Nobel Prize in Physics 2011: Adam G. Riess Facts".NobelPrize.org.Archivedfrom the original on 28 May 2020.Retrieved19 March2024.
  92. ^"What is Dark Energy? Inside our accelerating, expanding Universe".science.nasa.gov.Archivedfrom the original on 19 March 2024.Retrieved19 March2024.
  93. ^Anderson, John D.; Campbell, James K.; Ekelund, John E.; Ellis, Jordan; Jordan, James F. (3 March 2008)."Anomalous Orbital-Energy Changes Observed during Spacecraft Flybys of Earth".Physical Review Letters.100(9): 091102.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.091102.ISSN0031-9007.
  94. ^Turyshev, Slava G.; Toth, Viktor T.; Kinsella, Gary; Lee, Siu-Chun; Lok, Shing M.; Ellis, Jordan (12 June 2012)."Support for the Thermal Origin of the Pioneer Anomaly".Physical Review Letters.108(24): 241101.arXiv:1204.2507.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.241101.
  95. ^Iorio, Lorenzo (May 2015)."Gravitational anomalies in the solar system?".International Journal of Modern Physics D.24(6): 1530015.arXiv:1412.7673.doi:10.1142/S0218271815300153.ISSN0218-2718.
  96. ^Brans, C.H. (March 2014)."Jordan–Brans–Dicke Theory".Scholarpedia.9(4): 31358.arXiv:gr-qc/0207039.Bibcode:2014Schpj...931358B.doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.31358.
  97. ^Horndeski, G.W. (September 1974). "Second-Order Scalar–Tensor Field Equations in a Four-Dimensional Space".International Journal of Theoretical Physics.88(10): 363–384.Bibcode:1974IJTP...10..363H.doi:10.1007/BF01807638.S2CID122346086.
  98. ^Milgrom, M. (June 2014)."The MOND paradigm of modified dynamics".Scholarpedia.9(6): 31410.Bibcode:2014SchpJ...931410M.doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.31410.
  99. ^Haugan, Mark P; Lämmerzahl, C (2011). "Einstein gravity from conformal gravity".arXiv:1105.5632[hep-th].

Sources

Further reading

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gravity&oldid=1256802741"