TheHukbalahap rebellionwas a rebellion staged by formerHukbalahaporHukbong Bayan Laban sa Hapon(lit. 'People's Anti-Japanese Army') soldiers against the Philippine government. It started in 1942 during theJapanese occupation of the Philippines,continued during the presidency ofManuel Roxas,and ended in 1954 under the presidency ofRamon Magsaysay.
Background
editDuring theJapanese occupation of the Philippines,theHukbalahapcreated a resistance army consisting largely of peasant farmers against the Japanese forces inCentral Luzon.The Huk Resistance, as it became popularly known, created a stronghold against the Japanese in the villages throughguerrilla warfare.During this time, the area was heavily protected by Huks, and Huk justice reigned.
The aftermath of the liberation from Japan was characterized by chaos. ThePhilippine government,prompted by the United States of America, disarmed and arrested the Huks for allegedly being communists. Harassment and abuses against peasant activists became common asUnited States Army Forces in the Far East(USAFFE) and thePhilippine Constabulary(civilian police) hunted them. Civilian casualties were substantial and the Huks decided to retreat into the mountains and to their guerrilla lifestyle.
Pre-war social change in Central Luzon
editThe late 1800s and early 1900s saw the opening up of the Philippine market to the US economy due to American victories in theSpanish–American Warin 1898 and thePhilippine–American Warin 1902. The arrival of the Americans was characterized by the expansion of capitalism already introduced by the Spaniards in theencomienda system;there was an exponential increase in the amount of free trade between the Philippines and the United States of America.[1]Landowners favored cash crops for export to the US, such as tobacco and sugar cane, over the usual rice or cereals, resulting in a smaller supply of staple foods for the peasant farmers.
This period saw the collapse of the social structures maintained under the Spanish for more than three centuries. Landowners had previously attended social functions such as the weddings and baptisms of their tenants, sponsored food during fiestas and conducted land inspections.[2]Landlords helped them in times of distress, especially financial ones, and were seen as protectors fromfriarsand government officials.
Patterns of farm management also changed. Traditional landowners wanted to modernize their farms and employ tenant-farmers as wage-earners with legal contracts in order to maximize their profit. This changed the social relations of the countryside, as indicated by comments from a landowner inNueva Ecija:[2]
In the old days… the landlord-tenant relationship was a real paternalistic one. The landlord thought of himself as a grandfather to all tenants, and so he was concerned with all aspects of their lives.… But the system had to be changed over time as the hacienda has to be put in a sound economic footing.. The landlord tenant relationship is a business partnership, it is not a family. The landlord has invested capital in the land, and the tenants give their labor... I was enthused about putting modern machinery to work like the modern farms I'd seen in the US.… The only machine here is the Japanese rice thresher.… Meanwhile, I try to make the tenants do as I said so the land will be more productive. If you tell a machine something it will do it. It's not the way with tenants.
As landowners turned their estates over the cash crops, the haciendas were left to caretakers. There was a growing unrest among the peasantry, which was characterized by small protests against their own landlords. This situation was especially true in theCentral Luzonarea of the Philippines. The sudden and extreme gap between the landlord and the tenant was the main cause of the peasant unrest.[3]
Growth of peasant organizations
editWith peasants out of work and cash crops being preferred to staple food, peasants started begging and stealing from the rice warehouses of the government.[2]There was despair during this troubled decade.[1]The early 1930s saw the formation of many small peasant unions, including:
- Samahang Magsasaka
- Kabisang Tales
- Katipunan ng mga Anak-Pawis sa Pilipinas
- Sakdal
- Aguman ding Maldang Talapagobra(AMT; General Workers' Union)
- Kalipunang Pambansa ng mga Magsasaka ng Pilipinas (KPMP; National Council of Peasants in the Philippines)
The objective of these movements was broadly to revert to the traditional tenancy system. The means of protest varied from strikes, to petitions of government officials (including the president) to court cases against landlords to winning local office.
In 1939, the two largest peasant organizations merged: The AMT with 70,000 members and the KPMP with 60,000.[2]They participated in 1940s election by joining with the Partido Sosyalista ng Pilipinas (PSP), a rural peasant political party, and ran with a complete slate of candidates under the Popular Front ticket inPampanga.AlthoughPedro Abad Santos,the founder of the PSP, did not win a seat, his party became synonymous with the peasant movements and eventually with the Huks. His right-hand man wasLuis Taruc,the future supreme commander of the Huks.
Rebellion
editJapan
editIn December 1941, theJapanese Armyinvadedthe Philippines.[1]The country did not have sufficient military capacity to protect its citizens and needed the help of the US, under theUSAFFE,to defend the country. Still, the peasants ofCentral Luzonfought against the Japanese for their own survival. The organized peasant movements of the 1930s in Central Luzon set the conditions for organized resistance against the Japanese. During the Japanese occupation, the organization became an underground political government[2]with a fully functioning military committee composed of 67 squadrons in 1944.[2]
On March 29, 1942, 300 peasant leaders[3]decided to form theHukbalahapor theHukbo ng Bayan Laban sa Hapon.This event marks the moment when the peasant movement became a guerrilla army. The Huks collected arms from civilians, gathered arms from retreating American and Filipino forces and prevented banditry.[2]By September 1942, there were 3,000 Huks under arms.[3]By 1946, the Huks numbered about 10,000.[3]The Huk army was composed of squadrons, and squadrons were composed of squads. In the town ofTalavera, Nueva Ecijaalone, there were 3 squadrons, with about 200 men each.[2]
Its top commanders wereCasto Alejandrino(AMT, PSP), Felipa Culala (KPMP), Bernardo Poblete (AMT), and Luis Taruc (AMT, PSP), with Taruc being the supreme military commander.[4]The communists claimed that the Hukbalahap was communist-led and initiated.[5]Prior to the war, none of the top leaders had any connections with the PKP,[2]and interviews conducted by Kerkvliet with members afterwards also points to a non-bias towards any ideology.
The Huks were well received by the villagers and were seen as their protectors from the abuses of the Japanese.Nationalism,empathy, survival, and revenge, all served as primary motives for the people to join.[2]Those who could not join the guerrilla army joined the underground government via its "secretly converted neighborhood associations", called Barrio United Defense Corps (BUDC).
The Hukbalahap also tried to recruit beyond Central Luzon[2]but were not as successful. Nonetheless, the Huks fought side-by-side with local troops of thePhilippine Commonwealth Army,thePhilippine Constabulary,and theUSAFFE,helping to repel the Japanese invasion of the Philippines.
Against the Americans
editLife for the Huks did not return to pre-war conditions even after World War II. Most of the landowners werecollaboratorsduring the Japanese occupation[2]and were no longer interested intenant farming.Furthermore, most of them had already moved to Manila during the war.
Not only was life economically unsustainable for the Huks, their hardships were aggravated by the hostility and repression they experienced from the USAFFE soldiers, the Philippine Constabulary, and landlords.[2]Former Huks were hunted down and arrested under orders of disarmament from the United States. Even the villagers were victimized: their properties were looted, food stolen and houses even burned in search of Huks who were possibly hiding in them.
The massacre of Squadron 77 was seen as a major act of hostility against the Huks which occurred inMalolos,Bulacanin February 1945.[3]Consisting of 109 Huks, Squadron 77 was returning home from Pampanga were surrounded by American and Filipino soldiers, disarmed and brought before USAFFE Col Adonias Maclang, who ordered them shot and buried in a mass grave. Maclang was later appointed mayor of Malolos by US CIC officers who approved the executions.[6]
Furthermore, in February 1945, theUS Counter Intelligence Corps(USCIC) decided that the only way to end what they saw as "Huk domination of the area"[2]was to arrest the prominent leaders of the Hukbalahap. There were almost 20 prominent leaders arrested, including the top two commanders of the Huks: Alejandrino and Taruc.
In September 1945, Taruc and other Huk leaders were freed from prison. Luis Taruc formally announced the end of the resistance movement. He gave the roster of Hukbalahap names to the US and Philippine governments, hoping for recognition from PresidentSergio Osmeñafor their participation during the Japanese war to qualify for war veteran's benefits. Four squadrons, consisting of about 2,000 men, were not recognized. The Huks saw it as adivide and conquertactic and decided not to accept anything from the government.
Taruc protested toDouglas MacArthurto stop the maltreatment of the Huks. Although at the top levels leaders were constantly negotiating with each other, the situation on the ground between the Huks and the US and Philippine forces was ripe for a full-scale rebellion. In the words of Huk supreme commander Taruc, the truce is "in effect only at the top level, between the government representatives and peasant leaders. On the level of the fields there was open conflict."[7]
Moreover, the harvest between the period of late 1945 to early 1946 not only exacerbated the plight of the Huks, it also further intensified the gap between the tenants and the landlords. There were "landowner-tenant disputes over high interest rates, loans, rent payments, and sharing agricultural expenses sometimes led to evictions."[2]The landed elites, who collaborated with the Japanese during the war, now pledged their allegiance to America. Together with the government, they agreed to a 60% share of harvests for the tenants, from the usual 50–50. But when harvest came, the promises were not kept.
So the Huks decided to join politics again.[2]The Pambansang Kaisahan ng Magbubukid (PKM) or National Peasants Union was formed. At the national level, the PKM lobbied for the 60–40 division of harvest. The PKM lobbied for better relations between peasants and landlords, low interest loans from landowner, for the setting up of banks by the government, enactment of laws to protect peasants from landowners and small landowners from big landowners, and "justice for everyone regardless of social standing.
But despite their meager aims, harassment and abuses continued. Local police, military police, and even "civilian guards" intimidated, arrested, and even killed Huk veterans and PKM supporters.
It is in this situation that the Huks formally allied with thePartido Komunista ng Pilipinas(PKP). The PKP had created the Committee of Labor Organizations (CLO) to spearhead its political offensive on the labor front.[2][5]It was composed of 76 trade unions from all over Manila and had a membership of 100,000 laborers.[3]On the other hand, peasant support for the PKM was significant in the countryside.
On July 15, 1945, theDemocratic Alliance(DA) was formed with the merger of the PKM and the CLO.[3]Despite the CLO's apparent ideological bias towards communism, the PKM partnered with them for better chances of winning the national elections, with the aim of finally representing the tenant farmers through legal political means at the national level.[2]The DA supported the candidacy of the incumbent president,Sergio Osmenaof theNacionalista Party,in order to ensure the defeat ofLiberal Party's Manuel Roxas.
The May 1946 elections won Manuel Roxas the presidency. The six DA candidates won their seats in the Congress. But the six DA Congressmen, together with 1 NP Congressmen and 3 NP Senators, were not allowed to take their seats in the House of Representatives with a resolution introduced by Rep. Jose Topacio Nueno and upheld by a majority of the congress on grounds of election fraud and terrorism.[5]
- Disqualified DA Congressmen
- Luis Taruc, 2nd district of Pampanga
- Amado Yuzon, 1st district Pampanga
- Jesus Lava, Bulacan
- Josa Cando, Nueva Ecija
- Constancio Padilla, Nueva Ecija
- Alejandro Simpauco, Tarlac
On July 4, 1946, the US government granted sovereignty to the Philippines. The Philippine economy at this point had become very dependent on the US economy.[8]The Philippine Trade Act of 1946 orBell Trade Actat that time was being debated in both chambers of the Legislature. Had the unseated Congressmen voted, the controversial bill might not have been passed.[2]The unseating of the DA congressmen, combined with unrelenting abuses of power from MPs in Central Luzon against the PKM, DA, and Huk veterans, and the Roxas administration's inclination in using military force only exacerbated negative sentiment among the peasants in Central Luzon. The new Roxas administration attempted a pacification program, with help from members of the PKP, PKM, and DA. Representatives such as Taruc, Alejandrino, andJuan Feleowere accompanied by MP guards and government officials to try and pacify peasant groups, without success. Within days of the so-called "truce", violence once again erupted in Central Luzon. Taruc, and others claimed that civilian guards and government officials were "sabotaging the peace process".[2]
On August 24, 1946, Feleo, on his way back to Manila after a pacification sortie in Cabiao, was stopped by a large band of "armed men in fatigue uniforms" inGapan, Nueva Ecija.Feleo was accompanied by his bodyguards and four barrio lieutenants, and he had planned to present them to the Secretary of the InteriorJose Zuluetato testify that their barrios were shelled by government forces for no reason at all, forcing them to evacuate. Feleo and the four barrio officials were taken by the men and killed.[5]Thousands of Huk veterans and PKM members were sure that Feleo was murdered by landlords, or possibly the Roxas administration itself.[2]
The incident led to Taruc presenting Roxas with an ultimatum:
The supreme test of your power has come. In your hands rests the destiny of our miserable people and our motherland. Yours is the power now to plunge them into chaos and horrible strife, or pacify and unite them as brother Filipinos in the spirit of liberty.
He then joined with the peasants and revived the Hukbalahap General Headquarters, beginning the Huk insurrection. On March 6, 1948, Roxas outlawed the Hukbalahap. Five weeks later, Roxas succumbed to a heart attack.[5]
Independent Philippines
edit
The Huks staged a rebellion against the Roxas presidency within months after the Philippine independence and days after Feleo's murder. They retreated to the mountains once more in fear for their lives and renamed themselves Hukbong Magpapalaya ng Bayan (HMB) or People's Liberation Army.[3]The government intensified its campaign against the Huks, which caused the rebellion to further escalate.[2]
President Roxas employed what he termed a "Mailed-Fist Policy" to stop the rebellion.[3]It was meant to crush the rebellion in 60 days. ThePhilippine Constabulary(PC) increased its operations against the Huks. Roxas viewed the Huks as Communists and saw the need for the group's suppression, including its peasant arm.[2][9]
The PKP disowned the HMB, claiming that the rebellion must serve a purpose beyond the interest of self-defense, and the PKP believed that a real revolution must be led by the working class and the labor movement, not the peasants, who they deemed incapable of comprehending the concept of dialectical materialism.[2][5][10]
Roxas overestimated the abilities of his army.[3]The Huks had trained inguerrilla warfareagainst the Japanese occupation, while the Philippine government was yet to establish a competent army. The government eventually sought the military aid of the United States. The rebellion lasted for years, with huge civilian casualties.[2]
During this time, the HMB had the same organizational structure as during the Hukbalahap resistance. It provided both an army against the civilian guards of the elites and the PC, and an underground government which was well known for "Huk justice".[2]Villagers supported the Huk squadrons again as well. It continued to grow in strength and in the numbers of its soldiers and supporters, reaching its zenith in 1950, when it had 12,800 soldiers and a mass base of 54,000.[3]
Roxas died of a heart attack a few weeks after declaring his Mailed Fist Policy. His successor, PresidentElpidio Quirino,had a more accommodating stand towards the Huks, but his failure to deliver fundamental land reforms and appease the Huks who had been victimized by the PC further intensified Huk demands.
On June 21, 1948, President Quirino granted the Huks amnesty.[3]A few days later, both theSenateand theCongressapproved the amnesty[2]provided that the Huks "present themselves with their arms and ammunition". But no matter how well the negotiations went in Manila, the continued fighting in the countryside affected them. Many Huks surrendered their arms unwillingly: as they understood it, the amnesty required only that they be registered.[2]Many Huks were forced to surrender and were often threatened and beaten up. Once the word spread of continued abuses, people no longer came to register their arms. On August 14, 1948, negotiations fell apart.[7]
In 1949, as an attack against the government, Hukbalahap members allegedly ambushed and murderedAurora Quezon,Chairwoman of thePhilippine Red Crossand widow of the Philippines' second president,Manuel L. Quezon,as she was en route to her hometown for the dedication of the Quezon Memorial Hospital. Several others were also killed, including her eldest daughter and son-in-law. This attack brought worldwide condemnation of the Huks, who claimed that the attack was done by "renegade" members, and justified further attacks by the Philippine government.[11]
On October 18, 1950, the entire secretariat of the Central Committee of the PKP, including General SecretaryJosé Lava,was arrested following the earlier capture of the Politburo in Manila.
Alleged Soviet involvement
editIn his study of the relationship between theSoviet Unionand the communist movement in the Philippines,Harvard University's Stephen J Morris wrote that "There is no evidence that the Soviet Union ever provided weapons to the communist-led Huk insurgents, but in their struggle, the Philippine communists were receiving at least propaganda support from the Soviet Union."[12]Prior to theSino-Soviet split,the USSR allowed China to take the lead role in supporting communist groups in East Asia and subsequently the USSR supported only the non-violent communist political party in the Philippines.[12]
In 1949, aNew York Timesreporter in Manila relayed reports that Soviet submarines were allegedly providing guns, ammunition, and supplies to the Huks.[13]
Resolution
editTaruc and his men immediately went back into hiding in theSierra Madremountains when negotiations fell apart on August 14, 1948.[7]The start of the 1950s was the beginning of the rebellion's decline. The decline is attributed to two main reasons:
- There was general weariness among the people from years of fighting.[2]Many prominent Huk leaders either had died or were too old to fight. The few leaders that remained were now pursued by the army even in the mountains. Ultimately, the villagers became weary of supporting the Huks, or just saw them as irrelevant.
- President Quirino transferred the anti-Huk campaigns from theDepartment of the Interior and Local Government(DILG) to theDepartment of National Defense(DND). UnderRamon Magsaysay's leadership, the army was purged of corrupt and inefficient officials. Major military offensives were launched and the army became innovative in pursuing the Huks in the mountains.[3]By 1951, army strength had increased by 60 percent over the previous year with 1,047-man BCTs. Furthermore, the PCs stopped their abuses of the peasants, which further caused peasants to no longer see the need for "Huk justice".[14]
The Huk Rebellion was finally put down through a series of reforms and military victories by Magsaysay, who became the seventh President.[15]In May 1954, through former senator Benigno Aquino Jr., Luis Taruc surrendered and accepted a 15-year imprisonment.
Women
editThis sectioncontainstoo many or overly lengthy quotations.(July 2024) |
The Huk movement was notable for its inclusion of women peasants, who advocated for inclusion in the movement in resistance to word of Japanese war atrocities against women, including rape and mutilation. Many of these women fought, but the majority of the resistance remained in villages, collecting supplies and intelligence.[16]Women in the forest camps were forbidden from entering combat,[16]but often trained in first aid, communication/propaganda, and recruitment tactics.[16]
A significant number of women joined the movement after its formation and forced the leadership to reconsider its gendered recruitment policy. Women themselves placed the issue of their participation on the agenda of the Huk movement. Outraged by stories, and in many cases direct experience, of Japanese brutality, and sometimes fearful for their personal safety, many young women from Central and Southern Luzon and even Manila responded to the call for mobilization. Most were between the ages of fifteen and thirty-five, single, and lived in peasant households. Some responded by joining the Huk camps and donating their services directly to the guerrilla movement. But most stayed in the villages, working within the BUDCs to collect supplies, money, and information for the guerrillas. These village-based BUDCs became important sites for female mobilization and politicization where women, operating under the nominal protection of the Japanese, could communicate with other villagers, discreetly gather information about the Japanese, and organize support for guerrilla activities without attracting suspicion.
— Vina Lanzona,Amazons of the Huk Rebellion: Gender, Sex, and Revolution in the Philippines(41)
In terms of recruitment, the Hukbalahap was non-discriminatory and encouraged masses from all backgrounds to join the resistance. Aside from the men, there were a surprisingly large number of women volunteers joining, being moved by the atrocities and abuses committed by the Japanese against the people. The majority of women were peasants, 15–35 years old, and unmarried. Most women stayed in the villages, offering to help through the collection of supplies, money, and information to aid the guerillas.
Women’s prewar experience in peasant movements in Central Luzon made them ideal organizers for the Hukbalahap. Often appearing inconspicuously, women were less suspicious in the eyes of the Japanese and moved freely around the villages, ostensibly just talking to people but actually exchanging information on guerrilla activities. Organizers such as Teofista Valerio and Elang Santa Ana understood that they were representatives of the People’s Liberation Army in the barrios.
— Vina Lanzona,Amazons of the Huk Rebellion: Gender, Sex, and Revolution in the Philippines(55)
Women were ideal couriers, and Huk leaders quickly recognized their potential, skill, and willingness to carry out this hazardous task. In the eyes of the Japanese, women were innocuous and unthreatening, figures whose presence in the barrios, usually with baskets of fruit and vegetables, gossiping mindlessly with their neighbors, was unremarkable. These impressions allowed women to travel from one barrio to another rarely suspected of being guerrillas.
— Vina Lanzona,Amazons of the Huk Rebellion: Gender, Sex, and Revolution in the Philippines(66)
Women in the Hukbalahap movement were primarily support troops, preferring to inconspicuously aid the movement by communicating with the villagers and acting as messengers for critical information about the Japanese troops. Due to their appearance and clothing, their activities were simply dismissed by the enemy who were focused on the resistance fighters themselves.
Women also played a major role in the intelligence networks, the part of the communication division that gathered information about the activities of the Japanese in the barrios. Like courier work, intelligence gathering looked effortless but was often risky. However, people who were part of the BUDCs were willing to do it. Loreta Betangkul insisted that the Japanese and their spies thought women were idle, sitting around in their homes and gossiping the whole day. They did not realize that these women were collecting information about Japanese plans and relaying it to the Huks.
— Vina Lanzona,Amazons of the Huk Rebellion: Gender, Sex, and Revolution in the Philippines(61–62)
Since situations in which guerrillas were killed or wounded were common, the Huks organized a medical division composed mostly of women who worked as nurses and caretakers. Just as in the mainstream society, most if not all nurses in the Hukbalahap were women. Many women embraced this responsibility, believing that they were best equipped to care for and nurture their comrades. These women felt they needed little if any training to perform the tasks of caring for comrades and attending to the sick. Many would have agreed with Prima Sobrevinas, who remarked that women “...have been trained their whole lives for this work."
— Vina Lanzona,Amazons of the Huk Rebellion: Gender, Sex, and Revolution in the Philippines(64)
Most of the women who worked in the headquarters served as clerks. Elena Sawit remembers typing documents written by and for Politburo leaders. Belen Simpauco arranged the movement’s paperwork. Celia Reyes and Avelina Santos worked as treasurers in their respective camps. They usually handled money for the movement, making sure that they had enough funds to give the guerrillas what they needed, especially food.
— Vina Lanzona,Amazons of the Huk Rebellion: Gender, Sex, and Revolution in the Philippines(65)
Another key task the women had was the traditional role as the homemaker and caretaker of the family. In this case, the Huk's medical division composed mainly of women who nursed the wounded back into fighting condition. They were also relied on to cook for the soldiers and clean the houses in the barriers for the Huk soldiers. Since only a few women were literate during that period, they were assigned secretarial work such as accounting and paperwork to organize the resources of the Huk.
References
editCitations
edit- ^abcConstantino, Renato;Constantino, Letizia R. (1975).The Philippines: A Past Revisited.Renato Constantino.ISBN978-971-8958-00-1.[page needed]
- ^abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzaaabacKerkvliet, Benedict(1977).The Huk Rebellion: A Case Study of Peasant Revolt in the Philippines.London:University of California Press.ISBN978-0-7425-1867-4.[page needed]
- ^abcdefghijklmLachica, Eduardo (1971).The Huks: Philippine Agrarian Society in Revolt.New York: Preager Publishing.LCCN77171236.OCLC230429.[page needed]
- ^Agoncillo, Teodoro(1990).History of the Filipino People 8th ed.Quezon City: Garotech Publishing. p. 448.ISBN978-971-8711-06-4.
After the meeting, a Military Committee was formed, with the following as members: Taruc, Banal (Bernardo Poblete), Casto Alejandrino, and Felipa Culala (Dayang-Dayang), an Amazon whose unit had recently killed several Japanese soldiers. Taruc was chosen chairman of the committee, with Alejandrino as second in command. Thus the birth of the Hukbalahap.
- ^abcdefSaulo, Alfredo (1969).Communism in the Philippines: An Introduction.Quezon City:Ateneo de Manila Press.OCLC130384.[page needed]
- ^Kerkvliet, Benedict J. (2002).The Huk Rebellion A Study of Peasant Revolt in the Philippines.Rowman & Littlefield. p. 113.ISBN9781461644286.
- ^abcTaruc, Luis(1953).Born of the People.Greenwood Pres. pp. 230–231.ISBN978-0-8371-6669-8.
- ^Dolan, Ronald E; Library Of Congress. Federal Research Division (1993).Philippines: A Country Study.LCCN92039812.[page needed]
- ^Ladwig 2014,p. 25–26.
- ^Lanzona, Vina A. (2009).Amazons of the Huk Rebellion: Gender, Sex, and Revolution in the Philippines.Univ of Wisconsin Press. p. 114.ISBN978-0-299-23093-7.
- ^Ladwig 2014,pp. 23–24.
- ^abMorris, Stephen J (March 1994). "The Soviet Union and the Philippine Communist Movement".Communist and Post-Communist Studies.27(1): 77–93.doi:10.1016/0967-067X(94)90031-0.
- ^"Submarine Mystery: Arms For Rebels in the Philippines".The Sydney Morning Herald.April 4, 1949.RetrievedJuly 23,2014.
- ^Ladwig 2014,pp. 19–45.
- ^Goodwin, Jeff (2001).No Other Way Out.doi:10.1017/CBO9780511812125.ISBN978-0-521-62948-5.[page needed]
- ^abcLanzona, Vina A. (2009).Amazons of the Huk Rebellion: Gender, Sex, and Revolution in the Philippines(Online-Ausg. ed.).Madison:University of Wisconsin Press.ISBN978-0-299-23094-4.
External links
edit
Media related toHukbalahap Rebellionat Wikimedia Commons
General references and works cited
edit- Ladwig, Walter C. (2014)."When the Police are the Problem"(PDF).Policing Insurgencies.pp. 19–45.doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198094883.003.0002.ISBN978-0-19-809488-3.
Further reading
edit- Ladwig III, Walter C. (2017).The Forgotten Front.doi:10.1017/9781316756805.ISBN978-1-316-75680-5.
- Galula, David; Nagi, John A. (1964).Counterinsurgency warfare: theory and practice.Greenwood Press.ISBN978-0-313-08636-6.OCLC230806568.
- Greenberg, Lawrence M. (1987).The Hukbalahap Insurrection: A Case Study of a Successful Anti-Insurgency Operation in the Philippines, 1946-1955.Washington, D.C.LCCN86-600597.DTICAD1112093.
{{cite book}}:CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Lembke, Andrew E. (2013).Lansdale, Magsaysay, America, and the Philippines: A Case Study of Limited Intervention Counterinsurgency(PDF).Fort Leavenworth, Kansas: Combat Studies Institute Press.ISBN978-0-9885837-6-4.DTICADA569506.