Hybrid (biology)

(Redirected fromHybrid plant)

Inbiology,ahybridis the offspring resulting from combining the qualities of two organisms of differentvarieties,subspecies,speciesorgenerathroughsexual reproduction.Generally, it means that each cell has genetic material from two different organisms, whereas an individual where some cells are derived from a different organism is called achimera.[1]Hybrids are not always intermediates between their parents such as inblending inheritance(a now discredited theory in moderngeneticsbyparticulate inheritance), but can showhybrid vigor,sometimes growing larger or taller than either parent. The concept of a hybrid is interpreted differently in animal and plant breeding, where there is interest in the individual parentage. Ingenetics,attention is focused on the numbers ofchromosomes.In taxonomy, a key question is how closely related the parentspeciesare.[clarification needed]

Amuleis asterilehybrid of a maledonkeyand a femalehorse.Mules are smaller than horses but stronger than donkeys, making them useful aspack animals.

Species arereproductively isolatedby strong barriers to hybridization, which include genetic and morphological differences, differing times of fertility, mating behaviors and cues, andphysiologicalrejection of sperm cells or the developingembryo.Some act beforefertilizationand others after it. Similar barriers exist in plants, with differences in flowering times,pollenvectors, inhibition of pollen tube growth, somatoplastic sterility, cytoplasmic-genic male sterility and the structure of the chromosomes. A few animal species and many plant species, however, are the result ofhybrid speciation,including important crop plants such aswheat,where the number of chromosomes has been doubled.

A form of often intentional human-mediated hybridization is the crossing of wild and domesticated species. This is common in both traditionalhorticultureand modernagriculture;many commercially useful fruits, flowers, garden herbs, and trees have been produced by hybridization. One such flower,Oenothera lamarckiana,was central to early genetics research intomutationismand polyploidy. It is also more occasionally done in the livestock and pet trades; some well-known wild × domestic hybrids arebeefaloandwolfdogs.Humanselective breedingofdomesticated animalsandplantshas also resulted in the development of distinctbreeds(usually calledcultivarsin reference to plants);crossbreedsbetween them (without any wildstock) are sometimes also imprecisely referred to as "hybrids".

Hybrid humansexisted in prehistory. For example,Neanderthalsand anatomically modern humans are thought to have interbred as recently as 40,000 years ago.

Mythological hybridsappear in human culture in forms as diverse as theMinotaur,blends of animals, humans and mythical beasts such ascentaursandsphinxes,and theNephilimof theBiblical apocryphadescribed as the wicked sons offallen angelsand attractive women.

Significance

edit

In evolution

edit

Hybridization between species plays an important role in evolution, though there is much debate about its significance. Roughly 25% of plants and 10% of animals are known to form hybrids with at least one other species.[2]One example of an adaptive benefit to hybridization is that hybrid individuals can form a "bridge" transmitting potentially helpful genes from one species to another when the hybridbackcrosseswith one of its parent species, a process calledintrogression.[3]Hybrids can also causespeciation,either because the hybrids are genetically incompatible with their parents and not each other, or because the hybrids occupy a different niche than either parent.

Hybridization is a particularly common mechanism for speciation in plants, and is now known to be fundamental to the evolutionary history of plants.[4]Plants frequently formpolyploids,individuals with more than two copies of each chromosome. Whole genome doubling has occurred repeatedly in plant evolution. When two plant species hybridize, the hybrid may double its chromosome count by incorporating the entire nuclear genome of both parents, resulting in offspring that are reproductively incompatible with either parent because of different chromosome counts.

In conservation

edit

Human impact on the environmenthas resulted in an increase in the interbreeding between regional species, and the proliferation ofintroduced speciesworldwide has also resulted in an increase in hybridization. This has been referred to asgenetic pollutionout of concern that it may threaten many species with extinction. Similarly,genetic erosionfrommonoculturein crop plants may be damaging the gene pools of many species for future breeding.

The conservation impacts of hybridization between species are highly debated. While hybridization could potentially threaten rare species or lineages by "swamping" the genetically "pure" individuals with hybrids, hybridization could also save a rare lineage from extinction by introducing genetic diversity.[5][6]It has been proposed that hybridization could be a useful tool to conserve biodiversity by allowing organisms to adapt, and that efforts to preserve the separateness of a "pure" lineage could harm conservation by lowering the organisms' genetic diversity and adaptive potential, particularly in species with low populations.[7][8][9]While endangered species are often protected by law, hybrids are often excluded from protection, resulting in challenges to conservation.

Etymology

edit
Liger,a lion/tiger hybrid bred in captivity

The term hybrid is derived from Latinhybrida,used for crosses such as of a tame sow and a wild boar. The term came into popular use in English in the 19th century, though examples of its use have been found from the early 17th century.[10]Conspicuous hybrids are popularly named withportmanteau words,starting in the 1920s with the breeding of tiger–lion hybrids (ligerandtigon).[11]

As seen by different disciplines

edit

Animal and plant breeding

edit

From the point of view of animal and plant breeders, there are several kinds of hybrid formed from crosses within a species, such as between differentbreeds.[12]Single cross hybrids result from the cross between twotrue-breeding organismswhich produces anF1 hybrid(first filial generation). The cross between two differenthomozygouslines produces an F1 hybrid that isheterozygous;having twoalleles,one contributed by each parent and typically one isdominantand the otherrecessive.Typically, the F1 generation is alsophenotypicallyhomogeneous, producing offspring that are all similar to each other.[13] Double cross hybrids result from the cross between two different F1 hybrids (i.e., there are four unrelated grandparents).[14] Three-way cross hybrids result from the cross between an F1 hybrid and an inbred line. Triple cross hybrids result from the crossing of two different three-way cross hybrids.[15]Top cross (or "topcross" ) hybrids result from the crossing of a top quality or pure-bred male and a lower quality female, intended to improve the quality of the offspring, on average.[16]

Population hybridsresult from the crossing of plants or animals in onepopulationwith those of another population. These include interspecific hybrids or crosses between different breeds.[17]In biology, the result of crossing of two populations is called asynthetic population.[18]

Inhorticulture,the term stable hybrid is used to describe anannual plantthat, if grown and bred in a smallmonoculturefree of externalpollen(e.g., an air-filtered greenhouse) produces offspring that are "true to type" with respect to phenotype; i.e., a true-breeding organism.[19]

Biogeography

edit

Hybridization can occur in thehybrid zoneswhere the geographical ranges of species, subspecies, or distinct genetic lineages overlap. For example, the butterflyLimenitis arthemishas two major subspecies in North America,L. a. arthemis(the white admiral) andL. a. astyanax(the red-spotted purple). The white admiral has a bright, white band on its wings, while the red-spotted purple has cooler blue-green shades. Hybridization occurs between a narrow area across New England, southern Ontario, and the Great Lakes, the "suture region". It is at these regions that the subspecies were formed.[20]Other hybrid zones have formed between described species of plants and animals.

Genetics

edit
Oenothera lamarckianais a permanent natural hybrid, studied intensively by the geneticistHugo de Vries.Illustration by De Vries, 1913.

From the point of view of genetics, several different kinds of hybrid can be distinguished.[21][22] A genetic hybrid carries two differentallelesof the samegene,where for instance one allele may code for a lighter coat colour than the other.[21][22]A structural hybrid results from the fusion ofgametesthat have differing structure in at least one chromosome, as a result ofstructural abnormalities.[21][22]A numerical hybrid results from the fusion of gametes having differenthaploid numbers of chromosomes.[21][22]A permanent hybrid results when only the heterozygousgenotypeoccurs, as inOenothera lamarckiana,[23]because all homozygous combinations are lethal.[21][22]In the early history of genetics,Hugo de Vriessupposed these werecaused by mutation.[24][25]

Genetic complementation

edit

Genetic complementation is a hybridization test widely used ingeneticsto determine whether two separately isolatedmutantsthat have the same (or similar)phenotypeare defective in the samegeneor in differentgenes(seeComplementation (genetics)article).[26]If a hybrid organism containing thegenomesof two different mutant parental organisms displays awild typephenotype, it is ordinarily considered that the two parental mutant organisms are defective in different genes. If the hybrid organism displays a distinctly mutant phenotype, the two mutant parental organisms are considered to be defective in the same gene. However, in some cases the hybrid organism may display a phenotype that is only weakly (or partially) wild-type, and this may reflect intragenic (interallelic) complementation.

Taxonomy

edit

From the point of view oftaxonomy,hybrids differ according to their parentage. Hybrids between differentsubspecies(such as between thedogandEurasian wolf) are called intra-specific hybrids.[27]Interspecific hybrids are the offspring frominterspecies mating;[28]these sometimes result in hybrid speciation.[29]Intergeneric hybrids result from matings between different genera, such as betweensheepandgoats.[30]Interfamilial hybrids, such asbetween chickensandguineafowlorpheasants,are reliably described but extremely rare.[31]Interordinal hybrids (between different orders) are few, but have been engineered between thesea urchinStrongylocentrotus purpuratus(female) and thesand dollarDendraster excentricus(male).[32]

Biology

edit

Expression of parental traits

edit
Hybrid betweenLady Amherst's pheasant(Chrysolophus amherstiae) and another species, probablygolden pheasant(Chrysolophus pictus)

When two distinct types of organisms breed with each other, the resulting hybrids typically have intermediate traits (e.g., one plant parent has red flowers, the other has white, and the hybrid, pink flowers).[33]Commonly, hybrids also combine traits seen only separately in one parent or the other (e.g., abird hybridmight combine the yellow head of one parent with the orange belly of the other).[33]

Mechanisms of reproductive isolation

edit

Interspecific hybrids are bred by mating individuals from two species, normally from within the same genus. The offspring display traits and characteristics of both parents, but are oftensterile,preventing gene flow between the species.[34]Sterility is often attributed to the different number of chromosomes between the two species. For example,donkeyshave 62chromosomes,horseshave 64 chromosomes, andmulesorhinnieshave 63 chromosomes. Mules, hinnies, and other normally sterile interspecific hybrids cannot produce viable gametes, because differences in chromosome structure prevent appropriate pairing and segregation duringmeiosis,meiosis is disrupted, and viable sperm and eggs are not formed. However, fertility in female mules has been reported with a donkey as the father.[35]

A variety of mechanisms limit the success of hybridization, including the large genetic difference between most species. Barriers include morphological differences, differing times of fertility, mating behaviors and cues, and physiological rejection of sperm cells or the developing embryo. Some act before fertilization; others after it.[36][37][38][39]

In plants, some barriers to hybridization include blooming period differences, different pollinator vectors, inhibition of pollen tube growth, somatoplastic sterility, cytoplasmic-genic male sterility and structural differences of the chromosomes.[40]

Speciation

edit
Durumwheat istetraploid,derived fromwild emmerwheat, which is a hybrid of two diploid wild grasses,Triticum urartuand a wild goatgrass such asAegilops searsiiorAe. speltoides.[41]

A few animal species are the result of hybridization. TheLonicera flyis a natural hybrid. The Americanred wolfappears to be a hybrid of thegray wolfand thecoyote,[42]although its taxonomic status has been a subject of controversy.[43][44][45]The Europeanedible frogis a semi-permanent hybrid betweenpool frogsandmarsh frogs;its population requires the continued presence of at least one of the parent species.[46]Cave paintings indicate that theEuropean bisonis a natural hybrid of theaurochsand thesteppe bison.[47][48]

Planthybridization is more commonplace compared to animal hybridization. Manycropspecies are hybrids, including notably the polyploidwheats:some have four sets of chromosomes (tetraploid) or six (hexaploid), while other wheat species have (like mosteukaryoticorganisms) two sets (diploid), so hybridization events likely involved the doubling of chromosome sets, causing immediate genetic isolation.[49]

Hybridization may be important in speciation in some plant groups. However, homoploid hybrid speciation (not increasing the number of sets of chromosomes) may be rare: by 1997, only eight natural examples had been fully described. Experimental studies suggest that hybridization offers a rapid route to speciation, a prediction confirmed by the fact that early generation hybrids and ancient hybrid species have matching genomes, meaning that once hybridization has occurred, the newhybrid genomecan remain stable.[50]

Manyhybrid zonesare known where the ranges of two species meet, and hybrids are continually produced in great numbers. These hybrid zones are useful as biological model systems for studying the mechanisms of speciation. Recently DNA analysis of a bear shot by a hunter in theNorthwest Territoriesconfirmed the existence of naturally occurring and fertilegrizzly–polar bear hybrids.[51]

Hybrid vigour

edit
Hybrid vigour:Salvia jurisicii x nutanshybrids (top centre, with flowers) are taller than their parentsSalvia jurisicii(centre tray) orSalvia nutans(top left).

Hybridization between reproductively isolated species often results in hybrid offspring with lower fitness than either parental. However, hybrids are not, as might be expected, always intermediate between their parents (as if there were blending inheritance), but are sometimes stronger or perform better than either parental lineage or variety, a phenomenon calledheterosis, hybrid vigour, or heterozygote advantage.This is most common with plant hybrids.[52]Atransgressive phenotypeis a phenotype that displays more extreme characteristics than either of the parent lines.[53]Plant breedersuse several techniques to produce hybrids, including line breeding and the formation of complex hybrids. An economically important example is hybridmaize(corn), which provides a considerable seed yield advantage over open pollinated varieties.Hybrid seeddominates the commercial maize seed market in the United States, Canada and many other major maize-producing countries.[54]

In a hybrid, any trait that falls outside the range of parental variation (and is thus not simply intermediate between its parents) is considered heterotic.Positive heterosisproduces more robust hybrids, they might be stronger or bigger; while the termnegative heterosisrefers to weaker or smaller hybrids.[55]Heterosis is common in both animal and plant hybrids. For example, hybrids between a lion and a tigress ( "ligers") are much larger than either of the two progenitors, while"tigons"(lioness × tiger) are smaller. Similarly, the hybrids between the common pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) and domestic fowl (Gallus gallus) are larger than either of their parents, as are those produced between the common pheasant and hen golden pheasant (Chrysolophus pictus).[56]Spurs are absent in hybrids of the former type, although present in both parents.[57]

Human influence

edit

Anthropogenic hybridization

edit

Hybridization is greatly influenced by human impact on the environment,[58]through effects such ashabitat fragmentationand species introductions.[59]Such impacts make it difficult toconserve the geneticsof populations undergoingintrogressive hybridization.Humans have introduced species worldwide to environments for a long time, both intentionally for purposes such asbiological control,and unintentionally, as with accidental escapes of individuals. Introductions can drastically affect populations, including through hybridization.[22][60]

Management

edit
Examples of hybrid flowers fromhybrid swarmsofAquilegia pubescensandAquilegia formosa

There is a kind of continuum with three semi-distinct categories dealing with anthropogenic hybridization: hybridization without introgression, hybridization with widespread introgression (backcrossing with one of the parent species), andhybrid swarms(highly variable populations with much interbreeding as well as backcrossing with the parent species). Depending on where a population falls along this continuum, the management plans for that population will change. Hybridization is currently an area of great discussion withinwildlife managementand habitat management.Global climate changeis creating other changes such as difference in population distributions which are indirect causes for an increase in anthropogenic hybridization.[58]

Conservationists disagree on when is the proper time to give up on a population that is becoming a hybrid swarm, or to try and save the still existing pure individuals. Once a population becomes a complete mixture, the goal becomes to conserve those hybrids to avoid their loss. Conservationists treat each case on its merits, depending on detecting hybrids within the population. It is nearly impossible to formulate a uniform hybridization policy, because hybridization can occur beneficially when it occurs "naturally", and when hybrid swarms are the only remaining evidence of prior species, they need to be conserved as well.[58]

Genetic mi xing and extinction

edit

Regionally developedecotypescan be threatened withextinctionwhen new alleles or genes are introduced that alter that ecotype. This is sometimes called genetic mi xing.[61]Hybridization and introgression, which can happen in natural and hybrid populations, of new genetic material can lead to the replacement of localgenotypesif the hybrids are morefitand have breeding advantages over the indigenous ecotype or species. These hybridization events can result from the introduction of non-native genotypes by humans or through habitat modification, bringing previously isolated species into contact. Genetic mi xing can be especially detrimental for rare species in isolated habitats, ultimately affecting the population to such a degree that none of the originally genetically distinct population remains.[62][63]

Effect on biodiversity and food security

edit
TheGreen Revolutionof the 20th century relied on hybridization to createhigh-yielding varieties,along with increased reliance on inputs offertilizers,pesticides,andirrigation.[64]

In agriculture andanimal husbandry,theGreen Revolution's use of conventional hybridization increased yields by breedinghigh-yielding varieties.The replacement of locally indigenous breeds, compounded with unintentional cross-pollination and crossbreeding (genetic mi xing ), has reduced the gene pools of various wild and indigenous breeds resulting in the loss ofgenetic diversity.[65]Since the indigenous breeds are often well-adapted to local extremes in climate and have immunity to local pathogens, this can be a significant genetic erosion of the gene pool for future breeding. Therefore, commercial plant geneticists strive to breed "widely adapted" cultivars to counteract this tendency.[66]

Different taxa

edit

In animals

edit

Mammals

edit

Familiar examples ofequid hybridsare the mule, a cross between a female horse and a male donkey, and the hinny, a cross between a female donkey and a male horse. Pairs of complementary types like the mule and hinny are called reciprocal hybrids.[67]Polar bearsandbrown bearsare another case of a hybridizing species pairs,[68]andintrogressionamong non-sister species of bears appears to have shaped theUrsidaefamily tree.[69]Among many other mammal crosses arehybrid camels,crosses between abactrian cameland adromedary.[70]There are many examples offelid hybrids,including theliger.The oldest-known animal hybrid bred by humans is thekungaequid hybrid produced as a draft animal and status symbol 4,500 years ago inUmm el-Marra,present-daySyria.[71][72]

The first known instance of hybrid speciation in marine mammals was discovered in 2014. Theclymene dolphin(Stenella clymene) is a hybrid of two Atlantic species, thespinnerandstriped dolphins.[73]In 2019, scientists confirmed that a skull found 30 years earlier was a hybrid between thebeluga whaleandnarwhal,dubbed thenarluga.[74]

Birds

edit

Hybridization between species is common in birds. Hybrid birds are purposefully bred by humans, but hybridization is also common in the wild.Waterfowlhave a particularly high incidence of hybridization, with at least 60% of species known to produce hybrids with another species.[75]Amongducks,mallardswidely hybridize with many other species, and the genetic relationships between ducks are further complicated by the widespread gene flow between wild and domestic mallards.[76]

One of the most common interspecific hybrids ingeeseoccurs between Greylag and Canada geese (Anser anserxBranta canadensis). One potential mechanism for the occurrence of hybrids in these geese is interspecificnest parasitism,where an egg is laid in the nest of another species to be raised by non-biological parents. The chick imprints upon and eventually seeks a mate among the species that raised it, instead of the species of its biological parents.[77]

Cagebird breeders sometimes breed bird hybrids known asmulesbetween species offinch,such asgoldfinch×canary.[78]

Amphibians

edit

Among amphibians, Japanesegiant salamandersand Chinese giant salamanders have created hybrids that threaten the survival of Japanese giant salamanders because of competition for similar resources in Japan.[79]

Fish

edit

Among fish, a group of about 50 natural hybrids betweenAustralian blacktip sharkand the largercommon blacktip sharkwas found by Australia's eastern coast in 2012.[80]

Russian sturgeonandAmerican paddlefishwere hybridized in captivity when sperm from the paddlefish and eggs from the sturgeon were combined, unexpectedly resulting in viable offspring. This hybrid is called asturddlefish.[81][82]

Cephalochordates

edit

The two generaAsymmetronandBranchiostomaare able to produce viable hybrid offspring, even if none have lived into adulthood so far, despite the parents' common ancestor living tens of millions of years ago.[83][84]

Insects

edit

Among insects, so-calledkiller beeswere accidentally created during an attempt to breed a strain of bees that would both produce more honey and be better adapted to tropical conditions. It was done by crossing aEuropean honey beeand anAfrican bee.[85]

TheColias eurythemeandC. philodicebutterflies have retained enough genetic compatibility to produce viable hybrid offspring.[86]Hybrid speciation may have produced the diverseHeliconiusbutterflies,[87]but that is disputed.[88]

The two closely related harvester ant speciesPogonomyrmex barbatusandPogonomyrmex rugosushave evolved to depend on hybridization. When a queen fertilizes her eggs with sperm from males of her own species, the offspring is always new queens. And when she fertilizes the eggs with sperm from males of the other species, the offspring is always sterile worker ants (and because ants arehaplodiploid,unfertilized eggs become males). Without mating with males of the other species, the queens are unable to produce workers, and will fail to establish a colony of their own.[89]

In plants

edit
The London planePlatanus × hispanica,is a natural hybrid, popular for street planting.

Plant species hybridize more readily than animal species, and the resulting hybrids are fertile more often. Many plant species are the result of hybridization, combined withpolyploidy,which duplicates the chromosomes. Chromosome duplication allows orderly meiosis and so viable seed can be produced.[90]

Plant hybrids are generally given namesthat include an "×" (not in italics), such asPlatanus × hispanicafor the London plane, a natural hybrid ofP. orientalis(oriental plane) andP. occidentalis(American sycamore).[91][92]The parent's names may be kept in their entirety, as seen inPrunus persica × Prunus americana,with the female parent's name given first, or if not known, the parent's names given Alpha betically.[93]

Plant species that are genetically compatible may not hybridize in nature for various reasons, including geographical isolation, differences in flowering period, or differences inpollinators.Species that are brought together by humans in gardens may hybridize naturally, or hybridization can be facilitated by human efforts, such as altered flowering period or artificial pollination. Hybrids are sometimes created by humans to produce improved plants that have some of the characteristics of each of the parent species. Much work is now being done with hybrids between crops and their wild relatives to improve disease resistance orclimate resiliencefor both agricultural and horticultural crops.[94]

Somecrop plants are hybridsfrom different genera (intergeneric hybrids), such asTriticaleTriticosecale,a wheat–ryehybrid.[95]Most modern and ancient wheat breeds are themselves hybrids;bread wheat,Triticum aestivum,is a hexaploid hybrid of three wild grasses.[41]Several commercial fruits includingloganberry(Rubus×loganobaccus)[96]andgrapefruit(Citrus×paradisi)[97]are hybrids, as are garden herbs such aspeppermint(Mentha×piperita),[98]and trees such as theLondon plane(Platanus × hispanica).[99][100]Among many natural plant hybrids isIris albicans,a sterile hybrid that spreads by rhizome division,[101]andOenothera lamarckiana,a flower that was the subject of important experiments byHugo de Vriesthat produced an understanding of polyploidy.[23]

Sterility in a non-polyploid hybrid is often a result of chromosome number; if parents are of differing chromosome pair number, the offspring will have an odd number of chromosomes, which leaves them unable to produce chromosomally balancedgametes.[103]While that is undesirable in a crop such as wheat, for which growing a crop that produces no seeds would be pointless, it is an attractive attribute in some fruits.Triploidbananasandwatermelonsare intentionally bred because they produce no seeds and are alsoparthenocarpic.[104]

In fungi

edit

Hybridization betweenfungalspecies is common and well established, particularly inyeast.[105]Yeast hybrids are widely found and used in human-related activities, such asbrewing[106]andwinemaking.[107]The production oflager beersfor instance are known to be carried out by the yeastSaccharomyces pastorianus,[108]acryotoleranthybrid betweenSaccharomyces cerevisiaeandSaccharomyces eubayanus,[109]which allows fermentation at low temperatures.

In humans

edit
Oase 2skull may be a human-Neanderthalhybrid.

There is evidence of hybridization between modern humans and other species of the genusHomo.In 2010, theNeanderthal genome projectshowed that 1–4% of DNA from all people living today, apart from mostSub-Saharan Africans,is of Neanderthal heritage. Analyzing the genomes of 600 Europeans and East Asians found that combining them covered 20% of the Neanderthal genome that is in the modern human population.[110]Ancient human populations lived and interbred with Neanderthals,Denisovans,and at least one otherextinctHomospecies.[111]Thus, Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA has been incorporated into human DNA by introgression.[112]

In 1998, a complete prehistorical skeleton found inPortugal,theLapedo child,had features of both anatomically modern humans andNeanderthals.[113]Some ancient human skulls with especially large nasal cavities and unusually shaped braincases represent human-Neanderthal hybrids. A 37,000- to 42,000-year-oldhuman jawbone found in Romania's Oase cavecontains traces of Neanderthal ancestry[a]from only four to six generations earlier.[115]All genes from Neanderthals in the current human population are descended from Neanderthal fathers and human mothers.[116]

Mythology

edit
TheMinotaurof ancientGreek mythologywas (in one version of the myth) supposedly the offspring ofPasiphaëand a white bull.

Folk tales and myths sometimes contain mythological hybrids; theMinotaurwas the offspring of a human,Pasiphaë,and a white bull.[117]More often, they are composites of the physical attributes of two or more kinds of animals, mythical beasts, and humans, with no suggestion that they are the result of interbreeding, as in thecentaur(man/horse),chimera(goat/lion/snake),hippocamp(fish/horse), andsphinx(woman/lion).[118]TheOld Testamentmentions a first generation of half-human hybridgiants,theNephilim,[119][120]while theapocryphalBook of Enochdescribes the Nephilim as the wicked sons offallen angelsand attractive women.[121]

See also

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^Signs of Neanderthal lineage include a wide jaw and large teeth that get bigger toward the back of the mouth.[114]

References

edit
  1. ^Taddeo, Sarah; Robert, Jason S. (4 November 2014)."'Hybrids and Chimeras: A Consultation on the Ethical and Social Implications of Creating Human/Animal Embryos in Research' 2007, by the HFEA ".The Embryo Project.Arizona State University.
  2. ^Quilodran, Claudio S.; Montoya-Burgos, Juan I.; Currat, Matthias (2020)."Harmonizing hybridization dissonance in conservation".Communications Biology.3(391): 391.doi:10.1038/s42003-020-1116-9.PMC7374702.PMID32694629.
  3. ^Twyford, A D; Ennos, R A (2012)."Next-generation hybridization and introgression".Heredity.108(3): 179–189.doi:10.1038/hdy.2011.68.PMC3282392.PMID21897439.
  4. ^Soltis, Pamela S; Soltis, Douglas E. (2009). "The Role of Hybridization in Plant Speciation".Annual Review of Plant Biology.60:561–568.doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.092039.PMID19575590.
  5. ^Hirasheiki, Claire; Kareiva, Peter; Marvier, Michelle (2021). "Concern over hybridization risks should not preclude conservation interventions".Conservation Science and Practice.3(4).Bibcode:2021ConSP...3E.424H.doi:10.1111/csp2.424.
  6. ^Todesco, Marco; Pascual, Mariana A.; Owens, Gregory L.; Ostevik, Katherine L.; Moyers, Brook T.; Hubner, Sariel; Heredia, Sylvia M.; Hahn, Min A.; Caseys, Celine; Bock, Dan; Reiseberg, Loren (2016)."Hybridization and extinction".Evolutionary Applications.9(7): 892–908.Bibcode:2016EvApp...9..892T.doi:10.1111/eva.12367.PMC4947151.PMID27468307.
  7. ^Chan, Wing Yan; Hoffmann, Ary A.; van Oppen, Madeleine J. H. (2019)."Hybridization as a conservation management tool".Conservation Letters.12(5).Bibcode:2019ConL...12E2652C.doi:10.1111/conl.12652.
  8. ^Quilodran, Claudio S.; Montoya-Burgos, Juan I.; Currat, Matthias (2020)."Harmonizing hybridization dissonance in conservation".Communications Biology.3(391): 391.doi:10.1038/s42003-020-1116-9.PMC7374702.PMID32694629.
  9. ^Miller, Joshua M.; Hamilton, Jill A. (2016). "Interspecies hybridization in the conservation toolbox: response to Kovach et al. (2016)".Conservation Biology.30(2): 431–433.Bibcode:2016ConBi..30..431M.doi:10.1111/cobi.12677.PMID26918380.
  10. ^"Hybrid".Online Etymology Dictionary.Archivedfrom the original on 16 March 2016.Retrieved28 June2017.
  11. ^"When the sire is a lion the result is termed a Liger, while the converse is a Tigon." Edward George Boulenger,World natural history,B. T. Batsford ltd., 1937, p. 40
  12. ^Wricke, Gunter; Weber, Eberhard (1986).Quantitative genetics and selection in plant breeding.W. de Gruyter. p. 257.
  13. ^Runge, Marschall S.; Patterson, Cam, eds. (2006).Principles of Molecular Medicine.Humana Press. p. 58.ISBN9781588292025.Archivedfrom the original on 15 December 2019.Retrieved27 May2017.
  14. ^Rawlings, J. O.; Cockerham, C. Clark (June 1962). "Analysis of Double Cross Hybrid Populations".Biometrics.18(2): 229–244.doi:10.2307/2527461.JSTOR2527461.
  15. ^Thompson, K. F. (1964)."Triple-cross hybrid kale".Euphytica.13(2): 173.doi:10.1007/BF00033306.S2CID30141635.Archivedfrom the original on 10 April 2017.Retrieved31 August2017.
  16. ^"Topcross".Merriam-Webster.Archivedfrom the original on 21 March 2017.Retrieved20 March2017.
  17. ^McCarthy, Eugene M."Hybrid Populations".Macroevolution.Archivedfrom the original on 21 March 2017.Retrieved20 March2017.
  18. ^Grenier, Cécile; Cao, Tuong-Vi; Ospina, Yolima; Quintero, Constanza; Châtel, Marc Henri; Tohme, Joe; Courtois, Brigitte; Ahmadi, Nourollah (27 August 2015)."Accuracy of Genomic Selection in a Rice Synthetic Population Developed for Recurrent Selection Breeding".PLOS ONE.10(8): e0136594.Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1036594G.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136594.ISSN1932-6203.PMC4551487.PMID26313446.
  19. ^Toogood, A., ed. (1999).Plant Propagation.American Horticultural Society. p.21.ISBN9780789455208.
  20. ^Ries, Leslie; Mullen, Sean P. (2008). "A Rare Model Limits the Distribution of Its More Common Mimic: A Twist on Frequency-Dependent Batesian Mimicry".Evolution.62(7): 1798–803.doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00401.x.PMID18410533.S2CID42438552.
  21. ^abcdeRieger, R.; Michaelis, A.; Green, M. M. (1991).Glossary of Genetics: Classical and Molecular(5th ed.). Springer-Verlag. p.256.ISBN9780387520544.
  22. ^abcdefAllendorf, Fred (2007).Conservation and the Genetics of Populations.Blackwell. p. 534.
  23. ^abSirks, M. J. (2013).General Genetics.Springer. p. 408.ISBN9789401575874.Archivedfrom the original on 20 March 2017.Retrieved20 March2017.
  24. ^De Vries, Hugo(1901–1903).Die mutationstheorie(in German). Vol. I and II. Leipzig: Von Veit.
  25. ^de Vries, Hugo(January 1919)."Oenothera rubrinervis:A Half Mutant ".Botanical Gazette.67(1): 1–26.doi:10.1086/332396.JSTOR2468868.S2CID83752035.Archivedfrom the original on 18 January 2021.Retrieved23 August2020.
  26. ^Fincham, J. R. S. (April 1968). "Genetic Complementation".Science Progress.56(222): 165–177.OCLC239023.PMID4879184.
  27. ^Allendorf, Fred (2007).Conservation and the Genetics of Populations.Blackwell. pp. 421–448.
  28. ^Keeton, William T. (1980).Biological Science.Norton. p.A9.ISBN9780393950212.
  29. ^Arnold, M. L. (1996).Natural Hybridisation and Evolution.Oxford University Press. p. 232.ISBN9780195099751.
  30. ^Kelk, Dawn A.; Gartley, Cathy J.; Buckrell, Brian C.; King, W. Allan (1997)."The interbreeding of sheep and goats".Canadian Veterinary Journal.38(4): 235–237.PMC1576582.PMID9105723.
  31. ^Johnsgard, Paul A.(1983)."Hybridisation & Zoogeographic Patterns in Pheasants".University of Nebraska - Lincoln. p. 5.Archivedfrom the original on 17 August 2017.Retrieved20 March2017.
  32. ^Giudice, Giovanni (2012).Developmental Biology of the Sea Urchin Embryo.Elsevier. p. 171.ISBN9780323148788.Archivedfrom the original on 11 July 2020.Retrieved20 March2017.
  33. ^abMcCarthy, Eugene M. (2006).Handbook of Avian Hybrids of the World.Oxford University Press. pp. 16–17.
  34. ^Keeton, William T. (1980).Biological Science.New York: Norton. p. 800.ISBN9780393950212.
  35. ^Rong, R.; Chandley, A. C.; Song, J.; McBeath, S.; Tan, P. P.; Bai, Q.; Speed, R. M. (1988). "A fertile mule and hinny in China".Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics.47(3): 134–9.doi:10.1159/000132531.PMID3378453.
  36. ^Baker, H. G. (1959). "Reproductive methods as factors in speciation in flowering plants".Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol.24:177–191.doi:10.1101/sqb.1959.024.01.019.PMID13796002.
  37. ^Barton, N.; Bengtsson, B. O. (1986)."The barrier to genetic exchange between hybridising populations".Heredity.57(3): 357–376.doi:10.1038/hdy.1986.135.PMID3804765.S2CID28978466.
  38. ^Strickberger, M. (1978).Genética(in Spanish). Barcelona: Omega. pp. 874–879.ISBN9788428203692.
  39. ^Futuyma, D. (1998).Evolutionary Biology(3rd ed.). Sunderland: Sinauer.
  40. ^Hermsen, J. G. Th.; Ramanna, M. S. (January 1976). "Barriers to hybridisation ofSolanum bulbocastanumDun. andS. VerrucosumSchlechtd. and structural hybridity in their F1 plants ".Euphytica.25(1): 1–10.doi:10.1007/BF00041523.S2CID37518270.
  41. ^abGornicki, Piotr; et al. (2014). "The chloroplast view of the evolution of polyploid wheat".New Phytologist.204(3): 704–714.doi:10.1111/nph.12931.PMID25059383.
  42. ^Esch, Mary (31 May 2011)."Study: Eastern wolves are hybrids with coyotes".Boston.Associated Press.Archivedfrom the original on 22 March 2017.Retrieved22 March2017.
  43. ^Rutledge, Linda Y.; et al. (2012)."Conservation genomics in perspective: A holistic approach to understanding Canis evolution in North America"(PDF).Biological Conservation.155:186–192.Bibcode:2012BCons.155..186R.doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.05.017.Archived(PDF)from the original on 9 October 2022.[permanent dead link]
  44. ^Chambers, Steven M.; et al. (2012)."An account of the taxonomy of North American wolves from morphological and genetic analyses".North American Fauna.77:1–67.doi:10.3996/nafa.77.0001.
  45. ^Dumbacher, J. (January 2014)."Review of Proposed Rule Regarding Status of the Wolf Under the Endangered Species Act"(PDF).FWS.gov.NCEAS. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 11 June 2014.
  46. ^Frost, Grant; et al. (15 March 2006)."The amphibian tree of life".Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History.297(297): 1–291.doi:10.1206/0003-0090(2006)297[0001:TATOL]2.0.CO;2.S2CID86140137.
  47. ^Soubrier, Julien; et al. (18 October 2016)."Early cave art and ancient DNA record the origin of European bison".Nature Communications.7:13158.Bibcode:2016NatCo...713158S.doi:10.1038/ncomms13158.PMC5071849.PMID27754477.
  48. ^Daley, Jason."Cave Paintings Help Unravel the Mystery of the 'Higgs Bison'".Smithsonian.Archivedfrom the original on 21 October 2016.Retrieved20 October2016.
  49. ^Hancock, James F. (2004).Plant Evolution and the Origin of Crop Species.CABI Publishing.ISBN9780851996851.
  50. ^Rieseberg, Loren H. (1997). "Hybrid Origins of Plant Species".Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics.28:359–389.CiteSeerX10.1.1.718.9871.doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.359.
  51. ^"Hybrid bear shot dead in Canada".BBC News.13 May 2006.Archivedfrom the original on 22 June 2006.Retrieved10 June2006.
  52. ^Stokes, David (July 2007). "Evaluating the utility of Arabidopsis thaliana as a model for understanding heterosis in hybrid crops".Euphytica.156(1–2): 157–171.doi:10.1007/s10681-007-9362-1.S2CID22964055.
  53. ^Rieseberg, Loren H.; Archer, Margaret A.; Wayne, Robert K. (July 1999)."Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation".Heredity.83(4): 363–372.doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6886170.PMID10583537.S2CID2651616.
  54. ^Smith, C. Wayne (2004).Corn: Origin, History, Technology, and Production.Wiley. p. 332.
  55. ^McCarthy, Eugene M. (2006).Handbook of Avian Hybrids of the World.Oxford University Press. p. 17.ISBN9780195183238.
  56. ^Darwin, Charles(1868).Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication.Vol. II. p. 125.
  57. ^Spicer, J. W. G. (1854). "Note on hybrid gallinaceous birds".The Zoologist.12:4294–4296.
  58. ^abcAllendorf, Fred W.; Leary, R. F.; Spruell, P.; Wenburg, J. K. (2001). "The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines".Trends in Ecology & Evolution.16(11): 613–622.doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02290-X.
  59. ^Ehrlich, Paul;Holdren, John (26 March 1971). "Impact of population Growth".Science.171(3977): 1212–1216.Bibcode:1971Sci...171.1212E.doi:10.1126/science.171.3977.1212.PMID5545198.
  60. ^Vitousek, Peter; et al. (1997). "Introduced Species: A Significant Component of Human-cause Global Change".New Zealand Journal of Ecology.21(1): 1–16.
  61. ^Mooney, H. A.; Cleland, E. E. (2001)."The evolutionary impact of invasive species".PNAS.98(10): 5446–5451.Bibcode:2001PNAS...98.5446M.doi:10.1073/pnas.091093398.PMC33232.PMID11344292.
  62. ^Rhymer, J. M.; Simberloff, D. (1996). "Extinction by Hybridization and Introgression".Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics.27:83–109.doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.27.1.83.
  63. ^Potts, Brad M.; Barbour, Robert C.; Hingston, Andrew B. (2001).Genetic Pollution from Farm Forestry using eucalypt species and hybrids:A report for RIRDC/L&WA/FWPRDC Joint Venture Agroforestry Program(PDF).Rural Industrial Research and Development Corporation, Australian Government.ISBN9780642583369.ISSN1440-6845.RIRDC Publication No. 01/114; RIRDC Project No CPF - 3A. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 2 January 2004.
  64. ^Farmer, B. H. (1986). "Perspectives on the 'Green Revolution' in South Asia".Modern Asian Studies.20(1): 175–199.doi:10.1017/s0026749x00013627.S2CID145626108.
  65. ^"Genetic Pollution: The Great Genetic Scandal"Devinder SharmaArchived18 May 2009 at theWayback Machine;Bulletin 28
  66. ^Troyer, A. Forrest.Breeding Widely Adapted Cultivars: Examples from Maize.Encyclopedia of Plant and Crop Science, 27 February 2004.
  67. ^Griesbach, Robert J. (1986)."That Reciprocal Cross — Is It a Mule or Hinny?"(PDF).Awards Quarterly.17(3): 149.Archived(PDF)from the original on 20 March 2017.Retrieved19 March2017.
  68. ^Hailer, F.; Kutschera, V. E.; Hallstrom, B. M.; Klassert, D.; Fain, S. R.; Leonard, J. A.; Arnason, U.; Janke, A. (2012). "Nuclear Genomic Sequences Reveal that Polar Bears Are an Old and Distinct Bear Lineage".Science.336(6079): 344–347.Bibcode:2012Sci...336..344H.doi:10.1126/science.1216424.hdl:10261/58578.PMID22517859.S2CID12671275.
  69. ^Kutschera, V. E.; Bidon, T.; Hailer, F.; Rodi, J.; Fain, S. R.; Janke, A. (2014)."Bears in a forest of gene trees: phylogenetic inference is complicated by incomplete lineage sorting and gene flow".Molecular Biology and Evolution.31(8): 2004–2017.doi:10.1093/molbev/msu186.PMC4104321.PMID24903145.
  70. ^Bulliet, R. W. (1975).The Camel and the Wheel.Columbia University Press. pp.164–175.ISBN9780674091306.
  71. ^"Part donkey, part wild ass, the kunga is the oldest known hybrid bred by humans".Science News.14 January 2022.Retrieved14 January2022.
  72. ^Magazine, Smithsonian; Gamillo, Elizabeth."This Ancient Wild Ass Was the Earliest Known Animal Hybrid Bred by Humans".Smithsonian Magazine.Retrieved13 September2024.
  73. ^Bhanoo, Sindya (13 January 2014)."Scientists Find Rare Hybrid of Two Other Dolphin Species".The New York Times.Archivedfrom the original on 29 May 2020.Retrieved20 January2014.
  74. ^Kovrind, Mikkel; eight others."Hybridization between two high Arctic cetaceans confirmed by genomic analysis".Archivedfrom the original on 11 June 2020.Retrieved6 June2020.
  75. ^Ottenburghs, Jente; van Hooft, Pim; van Wieren, Sipke E.; Ydenberg, Ronald C.; Prins, Herbert H.T. (2016)."Hybridization in geese: a review".Frontiers in Zoology.13(20): 20.doi:10.1186/s12983-016-0153-1.PMC4866292.PMID27182276.
  76. ^Lavretsky, Philip; Jansen, Thijs; McCracken, Kevin G. (2019)."Identifying hybrids & the genomics of hybridization: Mallards & American black ducks of Eastern North America".Ecology and Evolution.9(6): 3470–3490.Bibcode:2019EcoEv...9.3470L.doi:10.1002/ece3.4981.PMC6434578.PMID30962906.
  77. ^Ottenburghs, Jente; van Hooft, Pim; van Wieren, Sipke E.; Ydenberg, Ronald C.; Prins, Herbert H.T. (2016)."Hybridization in geese: a review".Frontiers in Zoology.13(20): 20.doi:10.1186/s12983-016-0153-1.PMC4866292.PMID27182276.
  78. ^"British Mule/Hybrid".Severn Counties Foreign & British Bird Society.Archivedfrom the original on 5 May 2017.Retrieved19 March2017.
  79. ^"Godzilla vs. Godzilla—How the Chinese Giant Salamander is taking a toll on its Japanese Comic Counterpart".Amphibians.org. Archived fromthe originalon 30 June 2017.Retrieved12 March2017.
  80. ^Voloder, Dubravka (3 January 1012)."Print Email Facebook Twitter More World-first hybrid sharks found off Australia".ABC News.Archivedfrom the original on 5 January 2012.Retrieved5 January2012.
  81. ^Roth, Annie (15 July 2020)."Scientists Accidentally Bred the Fish Version of a Liger".The New York Times.ISSN0362-4331.Archivedfrom the original on 16 July 2020.Retrieved16 July2020.
  82. ^Káldy, Jenő; Mozsár, Attila; Fazekas, Gyöngyvér; Farkas, Móni; Fazekas, Dorottya Lilla; Fazekas, Georgina Lea; Goda, Katalin; Gyöngy, Zsuzsanna; Kovács, Balázs; Semmens, Kenneth; Bercsényi, Miklós (6 July 2020)."Hybridization of Russian Sturgeon (Acipenser gueldenstaedtii,Brandt and Ratzeberg, 1833) and American Paddlefish (Polyodon spathula,Walbaum 1792) and Evaluation of Their Progeny ".Genes.11(7): 753.doi:10.3390/genes11070753.ISSN2073-4425.PMC7397225.PMID32640744.
  83. ^Carvalho, João E.; Lahaye, François; Schubert, Michael (2017)."Keeping amphioxus in the laboratory: an update on available husbandry methods".The International Journal of Developmental Biology.61(10–11–12): 773–783.doi:10.1387/ijdb.170192ms.PMID29319123.
  84. ^Yue, Jia-Xing; Kozmikova, Iryna; Ono, Hiroki; Nossa, Carlos W.; Kozmik, Zbynek; Putnam, Nicholas H.; Yu, Jr-Kai; Holland, Linda Z. (12 July 2016)."Conserved Noncoding Elements in the Most Distant Genera of Cephalochordates: The Goldilocks Principle".Genome Biology and Evolution.8(8): 2387–2405.doi:10.1093/gbe/evw158.PMC5010895.PMID27412606.
  85. ^Hall, H. Glenn; Zettel-Nalen, Catherine; Ellis, James D."African Honey Bee: What You Need to Know".University of Florida IFAS Extension.Archivedfrom the original on 23 June 2008.Retrieved19 March2017.
  86. ^Grula, John W.; Taylor, Orley R. (1980). "The Effect of X-Chromosome Inheritance on Mate-Selection Behavior in the Sulfur Butterflies, Colias eurytheme and C. Philodice".Evolution.34(4): 688–95.doi:10.2307/2408022.JSTOR2408022.PMID28563983.
  87. ^Mallet, J.; Beltrán, M.; Neukirchen, W.; Linares, M. (2007)."Natural hybridization in heliconiine butterflies: The species boundary as a continuum".BMC Evolutionary Biology.7(1): 28.Bibcode:2007BMCEE...7...28M.doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-28.PMC1821009.PMID17319954.
  88. ^Brower, A. V. Z. (2011)."Hybrid speciation inHeliconiusbutterflies? A review and critique of the evidence ".Genetica.139(2): 589–609.doi:10.1007/s10709-010-9530-4.PMC3089819.PMID21113790.
  89. ^Inter-genomic sexual conflict drives antagonistic coevolution in harvester ants
  90. ^Goulet, Benjamin E.; Roda, Federico; Hopkins, Robin (2016)."Hybridization in Plants: Old Ideas, New Techniques".Plant Physiology.173(1): 65–78.doi:10.1104/pp.16.01340.PMC5210733.PMID27895205.
  91. ^McNeill, J.; Barrie, F. R.; Buck, W. R.; Demoulin, V.; Greuter, W.; Hawksworth, D. L.; Herendeen, P. S.; Knapp, S.; Marhold, K.; Prado, J.; Prud'homme Van Reine, W. F.; Smith, G. F.; Wiersema, J. H.; Turland, N. J. (2012).International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code) adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress Melbourne, Australia, July 2011.Vol. Regnum Vegetabile 154. A.R.G. Gantner.ISBN9783874294256.Archivedfrom the original on 25 December 2018.Retrieved19 March2017.
  92. ^"'Columbia' and 'Liberty' Planetree "(PDF).U.S. National Arboretum. 1999.Archived(PDF)from the original on 15 March 2017.Retrieved19 March2017.
  93. ^Gledhill, David (2008).The Names of Plants.Cambridge University Press. p. 23.ISBN9780521685535.Archivedfrom the original on 20 November 2018.Retrieved20 November2018.
  94. ^Warschefsky, E.; Penmetsa, R. V.; Cook, D. R.; von Wettberg, E. J. B. (8 October 2014)."Back to the wilds: Tapping evolutionary adaptations for resilient crops through systematic hybridization with crop wild relatives".American Journal of Botany.101(10): 1791–1800.doi:10.3732/ajb.1400116.PMID25326621.
  95. ^Stace, C. A.(1987). "Triticale: A Case of Nomenclatural Mistreatment".Taxon.36(2): 445–452.doi:10.2307/1221447.JSTOR1221447.
  96. ^Darrow, G.M. (1955). "Blackberry—raspberry hybrids".Journal of Heredity.46(2): 67–71.doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a106521.
  97. ^Carrington, Sean; Fraser, Henry C. (2003). "Grapefruit".A~Z of Barbados Heritage.Macmillan Caribbean. pp. 90–91.ISBN9780333920688.
  98. ^"Mint Genomics Resource: Species".Lange Laboratory, Washington State University. Archived fromthe originalon 21 March 2017.Retrieved20 March2017.
  99. ^Hull, R. (2009)."A Short Guide to the London Plane"(PDF).Archived(PDF)from the original on 6 December 2019.Retrieved2 February2016.
  100. ^Venables, B. (4 March 2015)."The Secret History of the London Plane Tree".Londonist. Archived fromthe originalon 2 February 2016.Retrieved2 February2016.
  101. ^"Legacy Bulbs Six".Pacific Bulb Society.Archivedfrom the original on 26 December 2016.Retrieved20 March2017.
  102. ^"Lilium Hybrids".Pacific Bulb Society.Archivedfrom the original on 11 March 2015.Retrieved22 March2015.
  103. ^"University of Colorado Principles of Genetics (MCDB 2150) Lecture 33: Chromosomal changes: Monosomy, Trisomy, Polyploidy, Structural Changes".University of Colorado.21 November 2000. Archived fromthe originalon 14 October 2012.
  104. ^Burr, Benjamin; Burr, Frances (2 October 2000)."How do seedless fruits arise and how are they propagated?".Scientific American.Archivedfrom the original on 20 March 2017.Retrieved20 March2017.
  105. ^del Olmo, Valentina; Mixão, Verónica; Fotedar, Rashmi; Saus, Ester; Al Malki, Amina; Księżopolska, Ewa; Nunez-Rodriguez, Juan Carlos; Boekhout, Teun; Gabaldón, Toni (30 October 2023)."Origin of fungal hybrids with pathogenic potential from warm seawater environments".Nature Communications.14(1): 6919.Bibcode:2023NatCo..14.6919D.doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42679-4.ISSN2041-1723.PMC10616089.PMID37903766.
  106. ^Gibson, Brian; Liti, Gianni (September 2014)."Saccharomyces pastorianus: genomic insights inspiring innovation for industry: Saccharomyces pastorianus: genomic insights".Yeast.32(1): 17–27.doi:10.1002/yea.3033.PMID25088523.
  107. ^Gonzalez, Ramon; Morales, Pilar (May 2022)."Truth in wine yeast".Microbial Biotechnology.15(5): 1339–1356.doi:10.1111/1751-7915.13848.ISSN1751-7915.PMC9049622.PMID34173338.
  108. ^Bond, Ursula (2009),Chapter 6 The Genomes of Lager Yeasts,Advances in Applied Microbiology, vol. 69, Elsevier, pp. 159–182,doi:10.1016/s0065-2164(09)69006-7,ISBN978-0-12-374824-9,PMID19729094,retrieved26 June2024
  109. ^Libkind, Diego; Hittinger, Chris Todd; Valério, Elisabete; Gonçalves, Carla; Dover, Jim; Johnston, Mark; Gonçalves, Paula; Sampaio, José Paulo (30 August 2011)."Microbe domestication and the identification of the wild genetic stock of lager-brewing yeast".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.108(35): 14539–14544.doi:10.1073/pnas.1105430108.ISSN0027-8424.PMC3167505.PMID21873232.
  110. ^Vernot, B.; Akey, J. M. (2014)."Resurrecting Surviving Neandertal Lineages from Modern Human Genomes".Science.343(6174): 1017–1021.Bibcode:2014Sci...343.1017V.doi:10.1126/science.1245938.PMID24476670.S2CID23003860.
  111. ^Green, R.E.; Krause, J.; Briggs, A.W.; Maricic, T.; Stenzel, U.; Kircher, M.; et al. (2010)."A Draft Sequence of the Neandertal Genome".Science.328(5979): 710–722.Bibcode:2010Sci...328..710G.doi:10.1126/science.1188021.PMC5100745.PMID20448178.
  112. ^Huerta-Sánchez, Emilia; Jin, Xin; Asan; Bianba, Zhuoma; Peter, Benjamin M.; Vinckenbosch, Nicolas; Liang, Yu; Yi, Xin; He, Mingze; Somel, Mehmet; Ni, Peixiang; Wang, Bo; Ou, Xiaohua; Huasang; Luosang, Jiangbai; Cuo, Zha XiPing; Li, Kui; Gao, Guoyi; Yin, Ye; Wang, Wei; Zhang, Xiuqing; Xu, Xun; Yang, Huanming; Li, Yingrui; Wang, Jian; Wang, Jun; Nielsen, Rasmus (2014)."Altitude adaptation in Tibetans caused by introgression of Denisovan-like DNA".Nature.512(7513): 194–197.Bibcode:2014Natur.512..194H.doi:10.1038/nature13408.PMC4134395.PMID25043035.
  113. ^Duarte, Cidalia; et al. (22 June 1999)."The early Upper Paleolithic human skeleton from the Abrigo do Lagar Velho (Portugal) and modern human emergence in Iberia".PNAS.96(13): 7604–7609.Bibcode:1999PNAS...96.7604D.doi:10.1073/pnas.96.13.7604.PMC22133.PMID10377462.
  114. ^Bower, Bruce (5 October 2016)."Animal hybrids may hold clues to Neandertal-human interbreeding".Sciencenews.Archivedfrom the original on 12 September 2017.Retrieved23 May2017.
  115. ^Fu, Qiaomei; et al. (13 August 2015)."An early modern human from Romania with a recent Neanderthal ancestor".Nature.524(7564): 216–219.Bibcode:2015Natur.524..216F.doi:10.1038/nature14558.PMC4537386.PMID26098372.
  116. ^Wang, C. C.; Farina, S. E.; Li, H. (2013) [online 2012]. "Neanderthal DNA and modern human origins".Quaternary International.295:126–129.Bibcode:2013QuInt.295..126W.doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2012.02.027.
  117. ^"Minotauros".Theoi.Archivedfrom the original on 22 March 2021.Retrieved20 March2017.
  118. ^"Bestiary".Theoi.Archivedfrom the original on 22 March 2017.Retrieved20 March2017.
  119. ^Kugel, James L. (2009).Traditions of the Bible: A Guide to the Bible As It Was at the Start of the Common Era.Harvard University Press.p. 198.ISBN9780674039766.
  120. ^Kugel, James L. (1997).The Bible as It Was.Harvard University Press.p. 110.ISBN9780674069411.
  121. ^Boyd, Gregory A.God at War: The Bible & Spiritual Conflict.IVP Academic. p. 177.
edit