Nanny state

Nanny stateis a term ofBritishorigin that conveys a view that a government or its policies are overprotective or interfering unduly withpersonal choice.^[1]^[2]The term likens such a government to the role that anannyhas inchild rearing.An early use of the term comes fromConservative British Member of Parliament Iain Macleodwho referred to "what I like to call the nanny state" in the 3 December 1965 edition ofThe Spectator.^[3]^[4]

The term was popularised by journalistsBernard Levin^[5]andAuberon Waugh^[6]and later by Prime MinisterMargaret Thatcher.

Uses of term

Australia

The term has been used to describe the policies of both federal and state governments. Canadian journalist and magazine publisherTyler Brûléargued that Australian cities were becoming over-sanitised and the country was on the verge of becoming the world's dumbest nation. This was blamed on the removal of personal responsibility and the increase in the number and scope of health and safety laws.^[7]Liberal DemocratssenatorDavid Leyonhjelmalso used the term when launching anAustralian Senateenquiry into laws and regulations that restrict personal choice "for the individual's own good".^[8]The term has also been used to criticise mandatory bicycle helmet laws, gun control laws, prohibitions on alcohol in public places, plain packaging for cigarettes and pub/club lockout laws.^[9]It has also been used in Anthony Albanese's proposal to raise the social media age of 13 to 16.^[10]

New Zealand

The term was used by theNew Zealand National Partyto describe the policies of their political opponents, theFifth Labour Government,who were in power from 1999 until 2008.^[11]In turn, the child policies of the National Party'sPaula Bennettwere later given the 'nanny state' label by a Māori Community Law Service manager in 2012.^[11]In 2017, theQueenstown-Lakes District Council's proposed restrictions on residents renting their rooms on the short term rental site,Airbnb,prompted criticism by the company, which described the move as "nanny-state".^[12]

Singapore

Thecity stateofSingaporehas a reputation as a nanny state, owing to the considerable number of governmentregulations and restrictionson its citizens' lives.^[13]FormerPrime Minister Lee Kuan Yew,the architect of the modern Singapore, observed: "If Singapore is a nanny state, then I am proud to have fostered one".^[14]In an interview in theStraits Timesin 1987, Lee said:

I am often accused of interfering in the private lives of citizens. Yes, if I did not, had I not done that, we wouldn’t be here today. And I say without the slightest remorse, that we wouldn’t be here, we would not have made economic progress, if we had not intervened on very personal matters–who your neighbour is, how you live, the noise you make, how you spit, or what language you use. We decide what is right. Never mind what the people think.^[15]

United Kingdom

In 1980,Lord Balfour of Inchryestrongly opposed the introduction ofseatbelt legislation,saying it was "yet another state narrowing of individual freedom and individual responsibility". He worried that future intrusions of the "nanny state" would include restrictions on cigarettes, alcohol, and mandatory life jackets.^[16]

In 2004,King's Fund,athink tank,conducted a survey of more than 1,000 people and found that most favoured policies that combatted behaviour such as eating a poor diet and public smoking – this was reported by theBBCas the public favouring a nanny state.^[17]^[18]

The BritishLabour PartypoliticianMargaret Hodgehas defended policies she acknowledged had been labelled as "nanny state", saying at a speech to theInstitute for Public Policy Researchon November 26, 2004, that "some may call it the nanny state but I call it a force for good".^[19]

The "Soft Drinks Industry Levy", the UK'ssugary drink taxproposed in 2016 and effective from 2018, was described by Member of ParliamentWill Quinceas "patronizing, regressive and the nanny state at its worst".^[20]

United States

By the 2000s, the term entered use in the United States by some political commentators. The term was used in an at-large sense against the legislative tendencies of liberal political ideology such as in the banishment of smoking in public places or the enactment of mandatory bicycle helmet laws.^[21]^[22]

In 2012, a proposal byNew York CityMayorMichael Bloombergto restrict the sale ofsoft drinksin venues, restaurants, and sidewalk carts to 16 ounces led to derision of the mayor as "Nanny Bloomberg."^[23]^[24]

David Harsanyihas used the term to describefood labeling regulations,thelegal drinking age,andsocially conservativegovernment policies.^[25]

Conversely,Dean Bakerof theCenter for Economic and Policy Researchthink tank used the term in 2006 to describeconservativepolicies that protect the income of the rich.^[26]

China

In September 2021, theWashington Posteditorial board decried "dictatorships" that "impose decisions about what people can see, hear and — to the extent the regimes can manage it — think." Xi Jinping, as General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party and President of the People's Republic of China, the board wrote, is "pushing the nanny state into people’s personal lives" with regulations on online gaming among the country's teenagers, as well as other matters. "Not many [parents]," the board argued, "want to cede parenting decisions to an authoritarian party-state."^[27]

References

^"nanny, n.1 and adj".OED Online.Oxford University Press. December 2011.Retrieved2 February2012.
^Wheeler, Brian (11 October 2018)."Are we living in a 'nanny state'?".BBC News.Retrieved30 August2020.
^70 m.p.h.,The Spectator,3 December 1965, p. 11.
^"Nanny Knows Best... Sometimes".The Times.4 October 2019.Retrieved30 August2020.
^"Industry Documents Library".
^"Industry Documents Library".
^"Nanny state rules making Australia 'world's dumbest nation'".The Sydney Morning Herald.2015-05-27.Retrieved2015-08-26.
^"David Leyonhjelm declares war on nanny state".The Australian.2015-06-26.Retrieved2015-08-26.
^"Welcome to Australia: the world's most over-regulated nanny state".The Daily Telegraph.2015-08-12.Retrieved2015-08-26.
^https:// rebelnews /nanny_state_australian_politicians_united_on_new_social_media_age_limits
^^a ^bCollins, Simon (27 January 2012)."Child policy smacks of nanny state, says critic".New Zealand Herald.Retrieved26 January2012.
^Amanda Cropp (December 2017)."Auckland's big time 'commercial' Airbnb hosts could be pinged with higher council rates".Business Today.
^Time for Singapore to Grow Up,Bloomberg News,March 29, 2015
^Lee Kuan Yew: Singapore's 'founding father' dies in hospital aged 91 after suffering with pneumonia,Daily Mirror,22 March 2015
^5 Quotes From Singapore's Lee Kuan Yew,23 March 2015
^Wheeler, Brian (11 October 2018)."Are we living in a 'nanny state'?".BBC News.
^"UK public wants a 'nanny state'".BBC News.2004-06-28.Retrieved2010-01-05.
^"The Nanny State Debate: A Place Where Words Don't Do Justice"(PDF).
^"'Nanny state' minister under fire ".BBC News.2004-11-26.
^Neville, Sarah (17 March 2016)."UK tax on sugary drinks is 'nannying' and 'impractical'".Financial Times.
^The Real Reason Behind Public Smoking Bans,PBS,July 8, 2013
^"America's 'Nanny State' Laws".CNBC.31 May 2012.Retrieved30 October2020.
^James, Frank (May 31, 2012)."Bloomberg Becomes Nanny-State Epitome For Some, Giving Obama A Breather".NPR:it's all politics.
^Grynbaum, Michael (May 31, 2012)."New York Plans to Ban Sale of Big Sizes of Sugary Drinks".New York Times.Retrieved2 June2012.The measures have led to occasional derision of the mayor as Nanny Bloomberg, by those who view the restrictions as infringements on personal freedom.
^Harsanyi, David (2007).Nanny state: how food fascists, teetotaling do-gooders, priggish moralists, and other boneheaded bureaucrats are turning America into a nation of children.Random House, Inc. pp.67–68.ISBN 978-0-7679-2432-0.OCLC 777893300.
^Baker, Dean(2006).The Conservative Nanny State: How the Wealthy Use the Government to Stay Rich and Get Richer.Washington, D.C.:Center for Economic and Policy Research.ISBN 978-1-4116-9395-1.OCLC 71423207.
^Washington Post Editorial Board (2021-09-07)."China's nanny state grows ever more intrusive".The Washington Post.Archivedfrom the original on 2021-09-09.