Nuclear strategyinvolves the development ofdoctrinesandstrategiesfor the production and use ofnuclear weapons.

As a sub-branch ofmilitary strategy,nuclear strategy attempts to match nuclear weapons as means to political ends. In addition to the actual use of nuclear weapons whetherin the battlefieldorstrategically,a large part of nuclear strategy involves their use as a bargaining tool.

Some of the issues considered within nuclear strategy include:

  • Conditions which serve a nation's interest to develop nuclear weapons
  • Types of nuclear weapons to be developed
  • How and when weapons are to be used

Many strategists argue that nuclear strategy differs from other forms ofmilitary strategy.The immense and terrifying power of the weapons makes their use, in seeking victory in a traditional military sense, impossible.

Perhaps counterintuitively, an important focus of nuclear strategy has been determining how to prevent and deter their use, a crucial part ofmutually assured destruction.

In the context ofnuclear proliferationand maintaining thebalance of power,states also seek to prevent other states from acquiring nuclear weapons as part of nuclear strategy.

Nuclear deterrent composition

edit

The doctrine ofmutual assured destruction(MAD) assumes that a nuclear deterrent force must be credible and survivable. That is, each deterrent force must survive afirst strikewith sufficient capability to effectively destroy the other country in asecond strike.Therefore, a first strike would be suicidal for the launching country.

In the late 1940s and 1950s as theCold Wardeveloped, theUnited StatesandSoviet Unionpursued multiple delivery methods and platforms to deliver nuclear weapons. Three types of platforms proved most successful and are collectively called a "nuclear triad".These are air-delivered weapons (bombs or missiles),ballistic missile submarines(usually nuclear-powered and called SSBNs), andintercontinental ballistic missiles(ICBMs), usually deployed in land-based hardenedmissile silosor on vehicles.

Although not considered part of the deterrent forces, all of the nuclear powers deployed large numbers oftactical nuclear weaponsin the Cold War. These could be delivered by virtually all platforms capable of delivering large conventional weapons.

During the 1970s there was growing concern that the combined conventional forces of theSoviet Union and the Warsaw Pactcould overwhelm the forces ofNATO.It seemed unthinkable to respond to a Soviet/Warsaw Pact incursion into Western Europe withstrategic nuclear weapons,inviting a catastrophic exchange. Thus, technologies were developed to greatly reduce collateral damage while being effective against advancing conventional military forces. Some of these werelow-yield neutron bombs,which were lethal to tank crews, especially with tanks massed in tight formation, while producing relatively little blast, thermal radiation, or radioactive fallout. Other technologies were so-called "suppressed radiation devices," which produced mostly blast with little radioactivity, making them much like conventional explosives, but with much more energy.[1]

See also

edit

Bibliography

edit

Early texts

edit

Secondary literature

edit
  • Baylis, John, and John Garnett.Makers of Nuclear Strategy.London: Pinter, 1991.ISBN1-85567-025-9.
  • Buzan, Barry,and Herring, Eric. "The Arms Dynamic in World Politics". London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1998.ISBN1-55587-596-3.
  • Freedman, Lawrence.The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy.2nd ed. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1989.ISBN0-333-97239-2.
  • Heuser, Beatrice.NATO, Britain, France and the FRG: Nuclear Strategies and Forces for Europe, 1949–2000(London: Macmillan, hardback 1997, paperback 1999), 256p.,ISBN0-333-67365-4
  • Heuser, Beatrice.Nuclear Mentalities? Strategies and Belief Systems in Britain, France and the FRG(London: Macmillan, July 1998), 277p., Index, Tables.ISBN0-333-69389-2
  • Heuser, Beatrice. "Victory in a Nuclear War? A Comparison of NATO and WTO War Aims and Strategies",Contemporary European HistoryVol. 7 Part 3 (November 1998), pp. 311–328.
  • Heuser, Beatrice. "Warsaw Pact Military Doctrines in the 70s and 80s: Findings in the East German Archives",Comparative StrategyVol. 12 No. 4 (Oct.–Dec. 1993), pp. 437–457.
  • Kaplan, Fred M.The Wizards of Armageddon.New York: Simon and Schuster, 1983.ISBN0-671-42444-0.
  • Rai Chowdhuri, Satyabrata.Nuclear Politics: Towards A Safer World,Ilford: New Dawn Press, 2004.
  • Rosenberg, David. "The Origins of Overkill: Nuclear Weapons and American Strategy, 1945–1960."International Security7, 4 (Spring, 1983): 3–71.
  • Schelling, Thomas C.The Strategy of Conflict.Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1960.
  • Smoke, Richard. National Security and the Nuclear Dilemma. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw–Hill, 1993.ISBN0-07-059352-3.

References

edit
  1. ^Solem, J. C. (1974). "Tactical nuclear deterrence".Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory Report LA-74-1362.