Packet switching

(Redirected fromPacket switched)

Intelecommunications,packet switchingis a method of groupingdatainto short messages in fixed format, i.e.packets,that are transmitted over a digitalnetwork.Packets are made of aheaderand apayload.Data in the header is used by networking hardware to direct the packet to its destination, where the payload is extracted and used by anoperating system,application software,orhigher layer protocols.Packet switching is the primary basis for data communications incomputer networksworldwide.

Paul BaranandDonald Daviesindependently invented the concept of digital packet switching used in modern computer networking including the Internet.[1][2][3]

During the early 1960s, American engineerPaul Barandeveloped a concept he calleddistributed adaptive message block switching,with the goal of providing afault-tolerant,efficient routing method for telecommunication messages as part of a research program at theRAND Corporation,funded by theUnited States Department of Defense.His ideas contradicted then-established principles of pre-allocationof networkbandwidth,exemplified by the development of telecommunications in theBell System.The new concept found little resonance among network implementers until the independent work of Welsh computer scientistDonald Daviesat theNational Physical Laboratoryin 1965. Davies coined the modern termpacket switchingand inspired numerous packet switching networks in the decade following, including the incorporation of the concept into the design of theARPANETin the United States and theCYCLADESnetwork in France. The ARPANET and CYCLADES were the primary precursor networks of the modernInternet.

Concept

edit
This animation illustrates a network model in which consecutive packets between hosts take differing routes. Out-of-order delivery is, however, detrimental to the performance of several network protocols, including TCP, sothe Internetattempts to route packets associated with the samedata streamalong the same path most of the time.[4]

A simple definition of packet switching is:

Theroutingand transferring of data by means of addressed packets so that achannelis occupied during thetransmissionof the packet only, and upon completion of the transmission the channel is made available for the transfer of othertraffic.[5][6]

Packet switching allows delivery ofvariable bit ratedata streams, realized as sequences of short messages in fixed format, i.e.packets,over acomputer networkwhich allocates transmission resources as needed usingstatistical multiple xingordynamic bandwidth allocationtechniques. As they traversenetworking hardware,such as switches androuters,packets are received, buffered, queued, and retransmitted (stored and forwarded), resulting in variable latency andthroughputdepending on the link capacity and the traffic load on the network. Packets are normally forwarded by intermediate network nodes asynchronously usingfirst-in, first-outbuffering, but may be forwarded according to some scheduling discipline forfair queuing,traffic shaping,or for differentiated or guaranteedquality of service,such asweighted fair queuingorleaky bucket.Packet-based communication may be implemented with or without intermediate forwarding nodes (switches and routers). In case of a shared physical medium (such as radio or10BASE5), the packets may be delivered according to amultiple accessscheme.

Packet switching contrasts with another principal networking paradigm,circuit switching,a method which pre-allocates dedicated network bandwidth specifically for each communication session, each having a constant bit rate and latency between nodes. In cases of billable services, such ascellular communicationservices, circuit switching is characterized by a fee per unit of connection time, even when no data is transferred, while packet switching may be characterized by a fee per unit of information transmitted, such as characters, packets, or messages.

A packet switch has four components: input ports, output ports, routing processor, and switching fabric.[7]

History

edit

Invention and development

edit
The "message block", designed by Paul Baran in 1962 and refined in 1964, is the first proposal of adata packet.[8][9]
Packet-switching cost performance trends, 1960-1980.[10]

The concept of switching small blocks of data was first explored independently byPaul Baranat theRAND Corporationduring the early 1960s in the US andDonald Daviesat theNational Physical Laboratory(NPL) in the UK in 1965.[1][2][3][11]

In the late 1950s, theUS Air Forceestablished awide area networkfor theSemi-Automatic Ground Environment(SAGE) radar defense system. Recognizing vulnerabilities in this network, the Air Force sought a system that might survive anuclear attackto enable a response, thus diminishing the attractiveness of the first strike advantage by enemies (seeMutual assured destruction).[12]In the early 1960s, Baran invented the concept ofdistributed adaptive message block switchingin support of the Air Force initiative.[13][14]The concept was first presented to the Air Force in the summer of 1961 as briefing B-265,[12]later published as RAND report P-2626 in 1962,[8]and finally in report RM 3420 in 1964.[9]The reports describe a general architecture for a large-scale, distributed, survivable communications network. The proposal was composed of three key ideas: use of adecentralizednetwork with multiple paths between any two points; dividing user messages intomessage blocks;and delivery of these messages bystore and forwardswitching.[13][15]Baran's network design was focused ondigital communicationof voice messages using switches that were low-cost electronics.[16][17][18]

Christopher Strachey,who becameOxford University'sfirst Professor of Computation, filed apatent applicationin the United Kingdom fortime-sharingin February 1959.[19][20]In June that year, he gave a paper "Time Sharing in Large Fast Computers" at theUNESCO Information Processing Conferencein Paris where he passed the concept on toJ. C. R. Licklider.[21][22]Licklider (along withJohn McCarthy) was instrumental in the development of time-sharing. After conversations with Licklider about time-sharing with remote computers in 1965,[23][24]Davies independently invented a similardata communicationconcept, using short messages in fixed format with high data transmission rates to achieve rapid communications.[25]He went on to develop a more advanced design for a hierarchical, high-speedcomputer networkincludinginterface computersandcommunication protocols.[26][27][28]He coined the termpacket switching,and proposed building a commercial nationwide data network in the UK.[29][30]He gave a talk on the proposal in 1966, after which a person from theMinistry of Defence(MoD) told him about Baran's work.[31]

Roger Scantlebury,a member of Davies' team, presented their work (and referenced that of Baran) at the October 1967Symposium on Operating Systems Principles(SOSP).[28][32][33][34][35]At the conference, Scantlebury proposed packet switching for use in theARPANETand persuadedLarry Robertsthe economics were favorable tomessage switching.[36][37][38][39][40][41]Davies had chosen some of the same parameters for his original network design as did Baran, such as a packet size of 1024 bits. To deal with packet permutations (due to dynamically updated route preferences) anddatagramlosses (unavoidable when fast sources send to a slow destinations), he assumed that "all users of the network will provide themselves with some kind of error control",[28]thus inventing what came to be known as theend-to-end principle.Davies proposed that a local-area network should be built at the laboratory to serve the needs of NPL and prove the feasibility of packet switching. After apilot experimentin early 1969,[42][43][44][45]theNPL Data Communications Networkbegan service in 1970.[46]Davies was invited to Japan to give a series of lectures on packet switching.[47]The NPL team carried outsimulationwork on datagrams andcongestionin networks on a scale to provide data communication across the United Kingdom.[45][48][49][50][51]

Larry Robertsmade the key decisions in therequest for proposalto build theARPANET.[52]Roberts met Baran in February 1967, but did not discuss networks.[53][54]He askedFrank Westerveltto explore the questions of message size and contents for the network, and to write a position paper on the intercomputer communication protocol including “conventions for character and block transmission, error checking and re transmission, and computer and user identification."[55]Roberts revised his initial design, which was to connect thehost computersdirectly, to incorporateWesley Clark'sidea to useInterface Message Processors(IMPs) to create amessage switchingnetwork, which he presented at SOSP.[56][57][58][59]Roberts was known for making decisions quickly.[60]Immediately after SOSP, he incorporated Davies' and Baran's concepts and designs for packet switching to enable the data communications on the network.[38][61][62][63]

A contemporary of Roberts' fromMIT,Leonard Kleinrockhad researched the application ofqueueing theoryin the field ofmessage switchingfor his doctoral dissertation in 1961–62 and published it as a book in 1964.[64]Davies, in his 1966 paper on packet switching,[26]applied Kleinorck's techniques to show that "there is an ample margin between the estimated performance of the [packet-switched] system and the stated requirement" in terms of a satisfactoryresponse timefor a human user.[65]This addressed a key question about the viability of computer networking.[66]Larry Roberts brought Kleinrock into the ARPANET project informally in early 1967.[67]Roberts and Taylor recognized the issue of response time was important, but did not apply Kleinrock's methods to assess this and based their design on astore-and-forwardsystem that was not intended forreal-time computing.[68]After SOSP, and after Roberts' direction to use packet switching,[61]Kleinrock sought input from Baran and proposed to retain Baran and RAND as advisors.[69][70][71]The ARPANET working group assigned Kleinrock responsibility to prepare a report on software for the IMP.[72]In 1968, Roberts awarded Kleinrock a contract to establish a Network Measurement Center (NMC) atUCLAto measure and model the performance of packet switching in the ARPANET.[69]

Bolt Beranek & Newman(BBN) won the contract to build the network. Designed principally byBob Kahn,[73][74]it was the first wide-area packet-switched network with distributed control.[52]The BBN "IMP Guys" independently developed significant aspects of the network's internal operation, including the routing algorithm, flow control, software design, and network control.[75][76]The UCLA NMC and the BBN team also investigated network congestion.[73][77]The Network Working Group, led bySteve Crocker,a graduate student of Kleinrock's at UCLA, developed the host-to-host protocol, theNetwork Control Program,which was approved by Barry Wessler for ARPA,[78]after he ordered certain more exotic elements to be dropped.[79]In 1970, Kleinrock extended his earlieranalyticwork on message switching to packet switching in the ARPANET.[80]His work influenced the development of the ARPANET and packet-switched networks generally.[81][82][83]

The ARPANET was demonstrated at theInternational Conference on Computer Communication(ICCC) in Washington in October 1972.[84][85]However, fundamental questions about the design of packet-switched networks remained.[86][87][88]

Roberts presented the idea of packet switching to communication industry professionals in the early 1970s. Before ARPANET was operating, they argued that the router buffers would quickly run out. After the ARPANET was operating, they argued packet switching would never be economic without the government subsidy. Baran had faced the same rejection and thus failed to convince the military into constructing a packet switching network in the 1960s.[10]

TheCYCLADESnetwork was designed byLouis Pouzinin the early 1970s to studyinternetworking.[89][90]It was the first to implement the end-to-end principle of Davies, and make the host computers responsible for the reliable delivery of data on a packet-switched network, rather than this being a service of the network itself.[91]His team was thus first to tackle the highly-complex problem of providing user applications with a reliablevirtual circuitservice while using abest-effort service,an early contribution to what will be theTransmission Control Protocol(TCP).[92]

Bob Metcalfeand others atXerox PARCoutlined the idea ofEthernetand thePARC Universal Packet(PUP) for internetworking.[93]

In May 1974,Vint CerfandBob Kahndescribed theTransmission Control Program,an internetworkingprotocolfor sharing resources using packet-switching among the nodes.[94]The specifications of the TCP were then published inRFC675(Specification of Internet Transmission Control Program), written by Vint Cerf,Yogen Dalaland Carl Sunshine in December 1974.[95]

TheX.25 protocol,developed byRémi Desprésand others, was built on the concept ofvirtual circuits.In the mid-late 1970s and early 1980s, national and internationalpublic data networksemerged using X.25 which was developed with participation from France, the UK, Japan, USA and Canada. It was complemented withX.75to enable internetworking.[96]

Packet switching was shown to be optimal in theHuffman codingsense in 1978.[97][98]

In the late 1970s, the monolithic Transmission Control Program was layered as the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), atop theInternet Protocol(IP). ManyInternet pioneersdeveloped this into theInternet protocol suiteand the associated Internet architecture and governance that emerged in the 1980s.[99][100][101][102][103][104]

For a period in the 1980s and early 1990s, the network engineering community was polarized over the implementation of competing protocol suites, commonly known as theProtocol Wars.It was unclear which of the Internet protocol suite and theOSI modelwould result in the best and most robust computer networks.[105][106][107]

Leonard Kleinrock's research work during the 1970s addressed packet switching networks, packet radio networks, local area networks, broadband networks, nomadic computing, peer-to-peer networks, and intelligent software agents.[108][109]His theoretical work onhierarchical routingwith studentFarouk Kamounbecame critical to the operation of the Internet.[110][111]Kleinrock published hundreds of research papers,[112][113]which ultimately launched a new field of research on the theory and application of queuing theory to computer networks.[80][114]

Complementarymetal–oxide–semiconductor(CMOS)VLSI(very-large-scale integration) technology led to the development of high-speedbroadbandpacket switching during the 1980s–1990s.[115][116][117]

The "paternity dispute"

edit

Roberts claimed in later years that, by the time of the October 1967 SOSP, he already had the concept of packet switching in mind (although not yet named and not written down in his paper published at the conference, which a number of sources describe as "vague" ), and that this originated with his old colleague, Kleinrock, who had written about such concepts in his Ph.D. research in 1961-2.[58][36][59][118][119]In 1997, along with seven otherInternet pioneers,Roberts and Kleinrock co-wrote "Brief History of the Internet" published by theInternet Society.[120]In it, Kleinrock is described as having "published the first paper on packet switching theory in July 1961 and the first book on the subject in 1964". Many sources about the history of the Internet began to reflect these claims as uncontroversial facts. This became the subject of whatKatie Hafnercalled a "paternity dispute" in The New York Times in 2001.[121]

The disagreement about Kleinrock's contribution to packet switching dates back to a version of the above claim made on Kleinrock's profile on the UCLA Computer Science department website sometime in the 1990s. Here, he was referred to as the "Inventor of the Internet Technology".[122]The webpage's depictions of Kleinrock's achievements provoked anger among some early Internet pioneers.[123]The dispute overprioritybecame a public issue after Donald Davies posthumously published a paper in 2001 in which he denied that Kleinrock's work was related to packet switching. Davies also described ARPANET project managerLarry Robertsas supporting Kleinrock, referring to Roberts' writings online and Kleinrock's UCLA webpage profile as "very misleading".[124][125]Walter Isaacsonwrote that Kleinrock's claims "led to an outcry among many of the other Internet pioneers, who publicly attacked Kleinrock and said that his brief mention of breaking messages into smaller pieces did not come close to being a proposal for packet switching".[123]

Davies' paper reignited a previous dispute over who deserves credit for getting the ARPANET online between engineers atBolt, Beranek, and Newman(BBN) who had been involved in building and designing the ARPANET IMP on the one side, and ARPA-related researchers on the other.[75][76]This earlier dispute is exemplified by BBN'sWill Crowther,who in a 1990 oral history described Paul Baran's packet switching design (which he calledhot-potato routing), as "crazy" and non-sensical, despite the ARPA team having advocated for it.[126]The reignited debate caused other former BBN employees to make their concerns known, including Alex McKenzie, who followed Davies in disputing that Kleinrock's work was related to packet switching, stating "... there is nothing in the entire 1964 book that suggests, analyzes, or alludes to the idea of packetization".[127]

FormerIPTOdirectorBob Tayloralso joined the debate, stating that "authors who have interviewed dozens of Arpanet pioneers know very well that the Kleinrock-Roberts claims are not believed".[128]Walter Isaacson notes that "until the mid-1990s Kleinrock had credited [Baran and Davies] with coming up with the idea of packet switching".[123]

A subsequent version of Kleinrock's biography webpage was copyrighted in 2009 by Kleinrock.[129]He was called on to defend his position over subsequent decades.[130]In 2023, he acknowledged that his published work in the early 1960s was about message switching and claimed he was thinking about packet switching.[131]Primary sources and historians recognize Baran and Davies for independently inventing the concept of digital packet switching used in modern computer networking including the ARPANET and the Internet.[1][2][38][132][133]

Kleinrock has received many awards for his ground-breakingapplied mathematical researchon packet switching, carried out in the 1970s, which was an extension of his pioneering work in the early 1960s on the optimization of message delays in communication networks.[80][134]However, Kleinrock's claims that his work in the early 1960s originated the concept of packet switching and that his work was a source of the packet switching concepts used in the ARPANET have affected sources on the topic, which has created methodological challenges in the historiography of the Internet.[121][123][125][130]Historian Andrew L. Russell said "'Internet history' also suffers from a third, methodological, problem: it tends to be too close to its sources. Many Internet pioneers are alive, active, and eager to shape the histories that describe their accomplishments. Many museums and historians are equally eager to interview the pioneers and to publicize their stories".[135]

Connectionless and connection-oriented modes

edit

Packet switching may be classified intoconnectionlesspacket switching, also known asdatagramswitching, andconnection-orientedpacket switching, also known asvirtual circuitswitching. Examples of connectionless systems are Ethernet, IP, and theUser Datagram Protocol(UDP). Connection-oriented systems include X.25,Frame Relay,Multiprotocol Label Switching(MPLS), and TCP.

In connectionless mode each packet is labeled with a destination address, source address, and port numbers. It may also be labeled with the sequence number of the packet. This information eliminates the need for a pre-established path to help the packet find its way to its destination, but means that more information is needed in the packet header, which is therefore larger. The packets are routed individually, sometimes taking different paths resulting inout-of-order delivery.At the destination, the original message may be reassembled in the correct order, based on the packet sequence numbers. Thus avirtual circuitcarrying abyte streamis provided to the application by atransport layerprotocol, although the network only provides a connectionlessnetwork layerservice.

Connection-oriented transmission requires a setup phase to establish the parameters of communication before any packet is transferred. Thesignalingprotocols used for setup allow the application to specify its requirements and discover link parameters. Acceptable values for service parameters may be negotiated. The packets transferred may include a connection identifier rather than address information and the packet header can be smaller, as it only needs to contain this code and any information, such as length, timestamp, or sequence number, which is different for different packets. In this case, address information is only transferred to each node during the connection setup phase, when the route to the destination is discovered and an entry is added to the switching table in each network node through which the connection passes. When a connection identifier is used, routing a packet requires the node to look up the connection identifier in a table.[citation needed]

Connection-oriented transport layer protocols such as TCP provide a connection-oriented service by using an underlying connectionless network. In this case, the end-to-end principle dictates that the end nodes, not the network itself, are responsible for the connection-oriented behavior.

Packet switching in networks

edit

In telecommunication networks, packet switching is used to optimize the usage ofchannel capacityand increaserobustness.[59]Compared tocircuit switching,packet switching is highly dynamic, allocating channel capacity based on usage instead of explicit reservations. This can reduce wasted capacity caused by underutilized reservations at the cost of removing bandwidth guarantees. In practice,congestion controlis generally used in IP networks to dynamically negotiate capacity between connections. Packet switching may also increase the robustness of networks in the face of failures. If a node fails, connections do not need to be interrupted, as packets may be routed around the failure.

Packet switching is used in theInternetand mostlocal area networks.The Internet is implemented by theInternet Protocol Suiteusing a variety oflink layertechnologies. For example, Ethernet and Frame Relay are common. Newermobile phonetechnologies (e.g.,GSM,LTE) also use packet switching. Packet switching is associated with connectionless networking because, in these systems, no connection agreement needs to be established between communicating parties prior to exchanging data.

X.25,the internationalCCITTstandard of 1976, is a notable use of packet switching in that it provides to users a service offlow-controlledvirtual circuits.These virtual circuits reliably carry variable-length packets with data order preservation.DATAPACin Canada was the first public network to support X.25, followed byTRANSPACin France.[136]

Asynchronous Transfer Mode(ATM) is another virtual circuit technology. It differs from X.25 in that it uses small fixed-length packets (cells), and that the network imposes noflow controlto users.

Technologies such as MPLS and theResource Reservation Protocol(RSVP) create virtual circuits on top of datagram networks. MPLS and its predecessors, as well as ATM, have been called "fast packet" technologies. MPLS, indeed, has been called "ATM without cells".[137]Virtual circuits are especially useful in building robust failover mechanisms and allocating bandwidth for delay-sensitive applications.

Packet-switched networks

edit

Donald Davies' work on data communications and computer network design became well known in the United States, Europe and Japan and was the "cornerstone" that inspired numerous packet switching networks in the decade following.[138][139][140][141][142][143][144][47]

The history of packet-switched networks can be divided into three overlapping eras: early networks before the introduction of X.25; the X.25 era when manypostal, telephone, and telegraph(PTT) companies providedpublic data networkswith X.25 interfaces; and theInternetera which initiallycompeted withtheOSI model.[145][146][147]

Early networks

edit

Research into packet switching at theNational Physical Laboratory(NPL) began with a proposal for a wide-area network in 1965,[23]and a local-area network in 1966.[148]ARPANET funding was secured in 1966 byBob Taylor,and planning began in 1967 when he hiredLarry Roberts.The NPL network followed by the ARPANET became operational in 1969, the first two networks to use packet switching.[43][44]Larry Roberts said many of the packet switching networks built in the 1970s were similar "in nearly all respects" to Donald Davies' original 1965 design.[144]

Before the introduction of X.25 in 1976,[149]about twenty different network technologies had been developed. Two fundamental differences involved the division of functions and tasks between the hosts at the edge of the network and the network core. In the datagram system, operating according to the end-to-end principle, the hosts have the responsibility to ensure orderly delivery of packets. In thevirtual callsystem, the network guarantees sequenced delivery of data to the host. This results in a simpler host interface but complicates the network. The X.25 protocol suite uses this network type.

AppleTalk

edit

AppleTalkis a proprietary suite of networking protocols developed byApplein 1985 forApple Macintoshcomputers. It was the primary protocol used by Apple devices through the 1980s and 1990s. AppleTalk included features that allowedlocal area networksto be establishedad hocwithout the requirement for a centralized router or server. The AppleTalk system automatically assigned addresses, updated the distributed namespace, and configured any requiredinter-network routing.It was aplug-n-playsystem.[150][151]

AppleTalk implementations were also released for theIBM PCand compatibles, and theApple IIGS.AppleTalk support was available in most networked printers, especiallylaser printers,somefile serversandrouters.

The protocol was designed to be simple, autoconfiguring, and not require servers or other specialized services to work. These benefits also created drawbacks, as Appletalk tended not to use bandwidth efficiently. AppleTalk support was terminated in 2009.[150][152]

ARPANET

edit

TheARPANETwas a progenitor network of the Internet and one of the first networks, along with ARPA'sSATNET,to run theTCP/IPsuite using packet switching technologies.

BNRNET

edit

BNRNET was a network whichBell-Northern Researchdeveloped for internal use. It initially had only one host but was designed to support many hosts. BNR later made major contributions to the CCITT X.25 project.[153]

Cambridge Ring

edit

TheCambridge Ringwas an experimentalring networkdeveloped at theComputer Laboratory, University of Cambridge.It operated from 1974 until the 1980s.

CompuServe

edit

CompuServedeveloped its own packet switching network, implemented on DECPDP-11minicomputers acting as network nodes that were installed throughout the US (and later, in other countries) and interconnected. Over time, the CompuServe network evolved into a complicated multi-tiered network incorporating ATM, Frame Relay, IP and X.25 technologies.

CYCLADES

edit

TheCYCLADESpacket switching network was a French research network designed and directed byLouis Pouzin.First demonstrated in 1973, it was developed to explore alternatives to the early ARPANET design and to support network research generally. It was the first network to use the end-to-end principle and make the hosts responsible for reliable delivery of data, rather than the network itself. Concepts of this network influenced later ARPANET architecture.[154][155]

DECnet

edit

DECnetis a suite of network protocols created byDigital Equipment Corporation,originally released in 1975 in order to connect twoPDP-11minicomputers.[156]It evolved into one of the firstpeer-to-peernetwork architectures, thus transforming DEC into a networking powerhouse in the 1980s. Initially built with threelayers,it later (1982) evolved into a seven-layerOSI-compliant networking protocol. The DECnet protocols were designed entirely by Digital Equipment Corporation. However, DECnet Phase II (and later) wereopen standardswith published specifications, and several implementations were developed outside DEC, including one forLinux.

DDX-1

edit

DDX-1 was an experimental network from Nippon PTT. It mixed circuit switching and packet switching. It was succeeded by DDX-2.[157]

The European Informatics Network (EIN), originally called COST 11, was a project beginning in 1971 to link networks in Britain, France, Italy, Switzerland andEuratom.Six other European countries also participated in the research on network protocols. Derek Barber directed the project, andRoger Scantleburyled the UK technical contribution; both were fromNPL.[158][159][160][161]The contract for its implementation was awarded to an Anglo French consortium led by the UK systems houseLogicaand Sesa and managed byAndrew Karney.Work began in 1973 and it became operational in 1976 including nodes linking theNPL networkandCYCLADES.[162]Barber proposed and implemented a mail protocol for EIN.[163]The transport protocol of the EIN helped to launch theINWGand X.25 protocols.[164][165][166]EIN was replaced byEuronetin 1979.[167]

EPSS

edit

The Experimental Packet Switched Service (EPSS) was an experiment of the UKPost Office Telecommunications.It was the firstpublic data networkin the UK when it began operating in 1976.[168]Ferrantisupplied the hardware and software. The handling of link control messages (acknowledgements and flow control) was different from that of most other networks.[169][170][171]

GEIS

edit

As General Electric Information Services (GEIS),General Electricwas a major international provider of information services. The company originally designed a telephone network to serve as its internal (albeit continent-wide) voice telephone network.

In 1965, at the instigation of Warner Sinback, a data network based on this voice-phone network was designed to connect GE's four computer sales and service centers (Schenectady, New York, Chicago, and Phoenix) to facilitate a computer time-sharing service.

After going international some years later, GEIS created a network data center nearCleveland,Ohio. Very little has been published about the internal details of their network. The design was hierarchical with redundant communication links.[172][173]

IPSANET

edit

IPSANETwas a semi-private network constructed byI. P. Sharp Associatesto serve their time-sharing customers. It became operational in May 1976.[174]

IPX/SPX

edit

TheInternetwork Packet Exchange(IPX) and Sequenced Packet Exchange (SPX) areNovellnetworking protocols from the 1980s derived from Xerox Network Systems' IDP and SPP protocols, respectively which date back to the 1970s. IPX/SPX was used primarily on networks using theNovell NetWare operating systems.[175]

Merit Network

edit

Merit Network,an independentnonprofit organizationgoverned by Michigan's public universities,[176]was formed in 1966 as the Michigan Educational Research Information Triad to explore computer networking between three of Michigan's public universities as a means to help the state's educational and economic development.[177]With initial support from theState of Michiganand theNational Science Foundation(NSF), the packet-switched network was first demonstrated in December 1971 when an interactive host-to-host connection was made between theIBM mainframesystems at theUniversity of MichiganinAnn ArborandWayne State UniversityinDetroit.[178]In October 1972, connections to theCDCmainframe atMichigan State UniversityinEast Lansingcompleted the triad. Over the next several years, in addition to host-to-host interactive connections, the network was enhanced to support terminal-to-host connections, host-to-host batch connections (remote job submission, remote printing, batch file transfer), interactive file transfer, gateways to theTymnetandTelenetpublic data networks,X.25 host attachments, gateways to X.25 data networks, Ethernet attached hosts, and eventuallyTCP/IP;additionally,public universities in Michiganjoined the network.[178][179]All of this set the stage for Merit's role in theNSFNETproject starting in the mid-1980s.

Donald Daviesof theNational Physical Laboratory (United Kingdom)designed and proposed a national commercial data network based on packet switching in 1965.[180][181]The proposal was not taken up nationally but the following year, he designed alocal networkusing "interface computers", today known asrouters,to serve the needs of NPL and prove the feasibility of packet switching.[182]

By 1968 Davies had begun building theNPL networkto meet the needs of the multidisciplinary laboratory and prove the technology under operational conditions.[183][45][184]In 1969, the NPL, followed by the ARPANET, were the first two networks to use packet switching.[185][44]By 1976, 12 computers and 75 terminal devices were attached,[186]and more were added until the network was replaced in 1986. NPL was the first to use high-speed links.[187][188][189]

Octopus

edit

Octopus was a local network atLawrence Livermore National Laboratory.It connected sundry hosts at the lab to interactive terminals and various computer peripherals including a bulk storage system.[190][191][192]

Philips Research

edit

PhilipsResearch Laboratories inRedhill, Surreydeveloped a packet switching network for internal use. It was a datagram network with a single switching node.[193]

PARC Universal Packet(PUP or Pup) was one of the two earliestinternetworkingprotocol suites;it was created by researchers atXerox PARCin the mid-1970s. The entire suite providedroutingand packet delivery, as well as higher level functions such as areliable byte stream,along with numerous applications. Further developments led toXerox Network Systems(XNS).[194]

RCP was an experimental network created by theFrench PTT.It was used to gain experience with packet switching technology before the specification ofTRANSPACwas frozen.[195]RCP was avirtual-circuitnetwork in contrast to CYCLADES which was based ondatagrams.RCP emphasised terminal-to-host and terminal-to-terminal connection; CYCLADES was concerned with host-to-host communication. RCP influenced the X.25 specification, which was deployed on TRANSPAC and other public data networks.[196][197][198]

RETD

edit

Red Especial de Transmisión de Datos (RETD) was a network developed byCompañía Telefónica Nacional de España.It became operational in 1972 and thus was the first public network.[199][200][201][202]

SCANNET

edit

"The experimental packet-switched Nordic telecommunication network SCANNET was implemented in Nordic technical libraries in the 1970s, and it included first Nordic electronic journal Extemplo. Libraries were also among first ones in universities to accommodate microcomputers for public use in the early 1980s."[203]

SITA HLN

edit

SITAis a consortium of airlines. Its High Level Network (HLN) became operational in 1969. Although organised to act like a packet-switching network,[23]it still usedmessage switching.[204][205]As with many non-academic networks, very little has been published about it.

SRCnet/SERCnet

edit

A number of computer facilities serving theScience Research Council(SRC) community in the United Kingdom developed beginning in the early 1970s. Each had their own star network (ULCC London,UMRCC Manchester,Rutherford Appleton Laboratory). There were also regional networks centred on Bristol (on which work was initiated in the late 1960s) followed in the mid-late 1970s by Edinburgh, the Midlands and Newcastle. These groups of institutionsshared resourcesto provide better computing facilities than could be afforded individually. The networks were each based on one manufacturer's standards and were mutually incompatible and overlapping.[206][207][208]In 1981, the SRC was renamed theScience and Engineering Research Council(SERC). In the early 1980s a standardisation and interconnection effort started, hosted on an expansion of the SERCnet research network and based on theColoured Book protocols,later evolving intoJANET.[209][210][211]

Systems Network Architecture

edit

Systems Network Architecture(SNA) isIBM's proprietary networking architecture created in 1974. An IBM customer could acquire hardware and software from IBM and lease private lines from a common carrier to construct a private network.[212]

Telenet

edit

Telenetwas the first FCC-licensedpublic data networkin the United States. Telenet was incorporated in 1973 and started operations in 1975. It was founded byBolt Beranek & NewmanwithLarry Robertsas CEO as a means of making packet switching technology public. Telenet initially used a proprietaryVirtual circuithost interface, but changed it to X.25 and the terminal interface to X.29 after their standardization inCCITT.[88]It went public in 1979 and was then sold to GTE.[213][214]

Tymnet

edit

Tymnetwas an international data communications network headquartered in San Jose, CA. In 1969, it began install a network based on minicomputers to connect timesharing terminals to its central computers. The network used store-and-forward and voice-grade lines. Routing was not distributed, rather it was established by a central supervisor on a call-by-call basis.[23]

X.25 era

edit
CCITT SGVII X25 Advocates

There were two kinds of X.25 networks. Some such asDATAPACandTRANSPACwere initially implemented with an X.25 external interface. Some older networks such as TELENET and TYMNET were modified to provide a X.25 host interface in addition to older host connection schemes. DATAPAC was developed byBell-Northern Researchwhich was a joint venture ofBell Canada(a common carrier) andNorthern Telecom(a telecommunications equipment supplier). Northern Telecom sold several DATAPAC clones to foreign PTTs including theDeutsche Bundespost.X.75andX.121allowed the interconnection of national X.25 networks.

AUSTPAC

edit

AUSTPACwas an Australian public X.25 network operated byTelstra.Established by Telstra's predecessor Telecom Australia in the early 1980s, AUSTPAC was Australia's first public packet-switched data network and supported applications such as on-line betting, financial applications—theAustralian Tax Officemade use of AUSTPAC—and remote terminal access to academic institutions, who maintained their connections to AUSTPAC up until the mid-late 1990s in some cases. Access was via a dial-up terminal to aPAD,or, by linking a permanent X.25 node to the network.[215]

ConnNet

edit

ConnNetwas a network operated by theSouthern New England Telephone Companyserving the state of Connecticut.[216][217]Launched on March 11, 1985, it was the first local public packet-switched network in the United States.[218]

Datanet 1

edit

Datanet 1 was the public switched data network operated by the Dutch PTT Telecom (now known asKPN). Strictly speaking Datanet 1 only referred to the network and the connected users vialeased lines(using theX.121DNIC 2041), the name also referred to the publicPADserviceTelepad(using the DNIC 2049). And because the mainVideotexservice used the network and modified PAD devices as infrastructure the name Datanet 1 was used for these services as well.[219]

DATAPAC

edit

DATAPACwas the first operational X.25 network (1976).[220]It covered major Canadian cities and was eventually extended to smaller centers.[citation needed]

Datex-P

edit

Deutsche Bundespost operated theDatex-Pnational network in Germany. The technology was acquired from Northern Telecom.[221]

Eirpac

edit

Eirpacis the Irish public switched data network supporting X.25 andX.28.It was launched in 1984, replacing Euronet. Eirpac is run byEircom.[222][223][224]

Euronet

edit

Nine member states of theEuropean Economic Communitycontracted withLogicaand the French company SESA to set up a joint venture in 1975 to undertake theEuronetdevelopment, using X.25 protocols to form virtual circuits. It was to replace EIN and established a network in 1979 linking a number of European countries until 1984 when the network was handed over to national PTTs.[225][226]

HIPA-NET

edit

Hitachidesigned a private network system for sale as a turnkey package to multi-national organizations.[when?]In addition to providing X.25 packet switching, message switching software was also included. Messages were buffered at the nodes adjacent to the sending and receiving terminals. Switched virtual calls were not supported, but through the use oflogical portsan originating terminal could have a menu of pre-defined destination terminals.[227]

Iberpac

edit

Iberpacis the Spanish public packet-switched network, providing X.25 services. It was based on RETD which was operational since 1972. Iberpac was run byTelefonica.[228]

IPSS

edit

In 1978, X.25 provided the first international and commercial packet-switching network, theInternational Packet Switched Service(IPSS).

JANET

edit

JANETwas the UK academic and research network, linking all universities, higher education establishments, and publicly funded research laboratories following its launch in 1984.[229]The X.25 network, which used theColoured Book protocols,was based mainly onGEC 4000 seriesswitches, and ran X.25 links at up to 8 Mbit/s in its final phase before being converted to an IP-based network in 1991. The JANET network grew out of the 1970s SRCnet, later called SERCnet.[230]

Packet Switch Stream(PSS) was thePost Office Telecommunications(later to becomeBritish Telecom) national X.25 network with aDNICof 2342. British Telecom renamed PSS Global Network Service (GNS), but the PSS name has remained better known. PSS also included public dial-up PAD access, and various InterStream gateways to other services such as Telex.

REXPAC

edit

REXPAC was the nationwide experimental packet switching data network in Brazil, developed by the research and development center ofTelebrás,the state-owned public telecommunications provider.[231]

SITA Data Transport Network

edit

SITAis a consortium of airlines. Its Data Transport Network adopted X.25 in 1981, becoming the world's most extensive packet-switching network.[232][233][234]As with many non-academic networks, very little has been published about it.

TRANSPAC

edit

TRANSPACwas the national X.25 network in France.[136]It was developed locally at about the same time as DATAPAC in Canada. The development was done by the French PTT and influenced by the experimental RCP network.[195]It began operation in 1978, and served commercial users and, afterMinitelbegan, consumers.[235]

Tymnet

edit

Tymnetutilized virtual call packet switched technology including X.25, SNA/SDLC, BSC and ASCII interfaces to connect host computers (servers) at thousands of large companies, educational institutions, and government agencies. Users typically connected via dial-up connections or dedicatedasynchronous serialconnections. The business consisted of a large public network that supported dial-up users and a private network business that allowed government agencies and large companies (mostly banks and airlines) to build their own dedicated networks. The private networks were often connected via gateways to the public network to reach locations not on the private network. Tymnet was also connected to dozens of other public networks in the U.S. and internationally via X.25/X.75 gateways.[236][237]

UNINETT

edit

UNINETT was a wide-area Norwegian packet-switched network established through a joint effort between Norwegian universities, research institutions and the Norwegian Telecommunication administration. The original network was based on X.25; Internet protocols were adopted later.[238]

VENUS-P

edit

VENUS-P was an international X.25 network that operated from April 1982 through March 2006. At its subscription peak in 1999, VENUS-P connected 207 networks in 87 countries.[239]

Xerox Network Systems(XNS) was aprotocol suitepromulgated byXerox,which providedroutingand packet delivery, as well as higher level functions such as areliable stream,andremote procedure calls.It was developed fromPARC Universal Packet(PUP).[240][241]

Internet era

edit

WhenInternetconnectivity was made available to anyone who could pay for anInternet service providersubscription, the distinctions between national networks blurred. The user no longer saw network identifiers such as the DNIC. Some older technologies such ascircuit switchinghave resurfaced with new names such asfast packet switching.Researchers have created some experimental networks to complement the existing Internet.[242]

CSNET

edit

TheComputer Science Network(CSNET) was a computer network funded by the NSF that began operation in 1981. Its purpose was to extend networking benefits forcomputer sciencedepartments at academic and research institutions that could not be directly connected toARPANETdue to funding or authorization limitations. It played a significant role in spreading awareness of, and access to, national networking and was a major milestone on the path to the development of the globalInternet.[243][244]

Internet2

edit

Internet2is a not-for-profit United Statescomputer networkingconsortiumled by members from the research and education communities, industry, and government.[245]The Internet2 community, in partnership withQwest,built the first Internet2 Network, calledAbilene,in 1998 and was a prime investor in theNational LambdaRail(NLR) project.[246]In 2006, Internet2 announced a partnership withLevel 3 Communicationsto launch a brand new nationwide network, boosting its capacity from 10 to 100 Gbit/s.[247]In October, 2007, Internet2 officially retired Abilene and now refers to its new, higher capacity network as the Internet2 Network.

NSFNET

edit
NSFNET Traffic 1991, NSFNET backbone nodes are shown at the top, regional networks below, traffic volume is depicted from purple (zero bytes) to white (100 billion bytes), visualization byNCSAusing traffic data provided by theMerit Network.

TheNational Science Foundation Network(NSFNET) was a program of coordinated, evolving projects sponsored by the NSF beginning in 1985 to promote advanced research and education networking in the United States.[248]NSFNET was also the name given to several nationwide backbone networks, operating at speeds of 56 kbit/s, 1.5 Mbit/s (T1), and 45 Mbit/s (T3), that were constructed to support NSF's networking initiatives from 1985 to 1995. Initially created to link researchers to the nation's NSF-funded supercomputing centers, through further public funding and private industry partnerships it developed into a major part of theInternet backbone.

NSFNET regional networks

edit

In addition to the five NSF supercomputer centers, NSFNET provided connectivity to eleven regional networks and through these networks to many smaller regional and campus networks in the United States. The NSFNET regional networks were:[249][250]

National LambdaRail

edit

TheNational LambdaRail(NRL) was launched in September 2003. It is a 12,000-mile high-speed national computer network owned and operated by the US research and education community that runs over fiber-optic lines. It was the first transcontinental10 Gigabit Ethernetnetwork. It operates with an aggregate capacity of up to 1.6 Tbit/s and a 40 Gbit/s bitrate.[255][256]NLR ceased operations in March 2014.

TransPAC2, and TransPAC3

edit

TransPAC2is a high-speed international Internet service connecting research and education networks in the Asia-Pacific region to those in the US.[257]TransPAC3 is part of the NSF's International Research Network Connections (IRNC) program.[258]

Very high-speed Backbone Network Service (vBNS)

edit

TheVery high-speed Backbone Network Service(vBNS) came on line in April 1995 as part of a NSF sponsored project to provide high-speed interconnection between NSF-sponsoredsupercomputingcenters and select access points in the United States.[259]The network was engineered and operated byMCI Telecommunicationsunder a cooperative agreement with the NSF. By 1998, the vBNS had grown to connect more than 100 universities and research and engineering institutions via 12 national points of presence withDS-3(45 Mbit/s),OC-3c(155 Mbit/s), andOC-12(622 Mbit/s) links on an all OC-12 backbone, a substantial engineering feat for that time. The vBNS installed one of the first ever productionOC-48(2.5 Gbit/s) IP links in February 1999 and went on to upgrade the entire backbone to OC-48.[260]

In June 1999 MCI WorldCom introduced vBNS+ which allowed attachments to the vBNS network by organizations that were not approved by or receiving support from NSF.[261]After the expiration of the NSF agreement, the vBNS largely transitioned to providing service to the government. Most universities and research centers migrated to the Internet2 educational backbone. In January 2006, whenMCIandVerizonmerged,[262]vBNS+ became a service ofVerizon Business.[263]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^abc"The real story of how the Internet became so vulnerable".Washington Post.Archived fromthe originalon 2015-05-30.Retrieved2020-02-18.Historians credit seminal insights to Welsh scientist Donald W. Davies and American engineer Paul Baran
  2. ^abcPelkey, James L.; Russell, Andrew L.; Robbins, Loring G. (2022).Circuits, Packets, and Protocols: Entrepreneurs and Computer Communications, 1968-1988(PDF).Morgan & Claypool. p. 4.ISBN978-1-4503-9729-2.Paul Baran, an engineer celebrated as the co-inventor (along with Donald Davies) of the packet switching technology that is the foundation of digital networks
  3. ^ab"Inductee Details - Paul Baran".National Inventors Hall of Fame.Retrieved6 September2017;"Inductee Details - Donald Watts Davies".National Inventors Hall of Fame.Retrieved6 September2017.
  4. ^Multipath Issues in Unicast and Multicast Next-Hop Selection.November 2000.doi:10.17487/RFC2991.RFC2991.
  5. ^Weik, Martin (6 December 2012).Fiber Optics Standard Dictionary.Springer Science & Business Media.ISBN978-1461560234.
  6. ^National Telecommunication Information Administration (1 April 1997).Telecommunications: Glossary of Telecommunications Terms.Vol. 1037, Part 3 of Federal Standard.Government Institutes.ISBN1461732328.
  7. ^Forouzan, Behrouz A.; Fegan, Sophia Chung (2007).Data Communications and Networking.Huga Media.ISBN978-0-07-296775-3.
  8. ^abBaran, Paul (1962)."RAND Paper P-2626".
  9. ^abBaran, Paul (January 1964)."On Distributed Communications".
  10. ^abRoberts, L. (1988),"The arpanet and computer networks",A history of personal workstations,New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 141–172,doi:10.1145/61975.66916,ISBN978-0-201-11259-7,retrieved2023-11-30
  11. ^Edmondson-Yurkanan, Chris (2007)."SIGCOMM's archaeological journey into networking's past".Communications of the ACM.50(5): 63–68.doi:10.1145/1230819.1230840.ISSN0001-0782.The 1960 challenge was to build a network such that a significant subset of the network could survive a military attack. [Baran] told us he knew he could design a solution once he realized that, 'given redundant paths, the reliability of the net work could be greater than the reliability of the parts.'... In his first draft dated Nov. 10, 1965, Davies forecast today's 'killer app' for his new communication service: 'The greatest traffic could only come if the public used this means for everyday purposes such as shopping... People sending enquiries and placing orders for goods of all kinds will make up a large section of the traffic... Business use of the telephone may be reduced by the growth of the kind of service we contemplate.'
  12. ^abStewart, Bill (2000-01-07)."Paul Baran Invents Packet Switching".Living Internet.Retrieved2008-05-08.
  13. ^abBaran, Paul (2002)."The beginnings of packet switching: some underlying concepts"(PDF).IEEE Communications Magazine.40(7): 42–48.doi:10.1109/MCOM.2002.1018006.ISSN0163-6804.Archived(PDF)from the original on 2022-10-10.Essentially all the work was defined by 1961, and fleshed out and put into formal written form in 1962. The idea of hot potato routing dates from late 1960.
  14. ^Baran, Paul (May 27, 1960)."Reliable Digital Communications Using Unreliable Network Repeater Nodes"(PDF).The RAND Corporation:1.Archived(PDF)from the original on 2022-10-10.RetrievedJuly 7,2016.
  15. ^"Paul Baran and the Origins of the Internet".RAND Corporation.Retrieved2020-02-15.
  16. ^Pelkey, James L."6.1 The Communications Subnet: BBN 1969".Entrepreneurial Capitalism and Innovation: A History of Computer Communications 1968–1988.As Kahn recalls:... Paul Baran's contributions... I also think Paul was motivated almost entirely by voice considerations. If you look at what he wrote, he was talking about switches that were low-cost electronics. The idea of putting powerful computers in these locations hadn't quite occurred to him as being cost effective. So the idea of computer switches was missing. The whole notion of protocols didn't exist at that time. And the idea of computer-to-computer communications was really a secondary concern.
  17. ^Waldrop, M. Mitchell (2018).The Dream Machine.Stripe Press. p. 286.ISBN978-1-953953-36-0.Baran had put more emphasis on digital voice communications than on computer communications.
  18. ^Kleinrock, L. (1978)."Principles and lessons in packet communications".Proceedings of the IEEE.66(11): 1320–1329.doi:10.1109/PROC.1978.11143.ISSN0018-9219.Paul Baran... focused on the routing procedures and on the survivability of distributed communication systems in a hostile environment, but did not concentrate on the need for resource sharing in its form as we now understand it; indeed, the concept of a software switch was not present in his work.
  19. ^"Computer Pioneers - Christopher Strachey".history puter.org.Retrieved2020-01-23.
  20. ^"Computer - Time-sharing, Minicomputers, Multitasking".Britannica.Retrieved2023-07-23.
  21. ^Corbató, F. J.; et al. (1963).The Compatible Time-Sharing System: A Programmer's Guide(PDF).MIT Press.ISBN978-0-262-03008-3.."the first paper on time-shared computers by C. Strachey at the June 1959 UNESCO Information Processing conference".
  22. ^Gillies & Cailliau 2000,p. 13
  23. ^abcdRoberts, Dr. Lawrence G. (November 1978)."The Evolution of Packet Switching".Archived fromthe originalon 24 March 2016.Retrieved5 September2017.
  24. ^Roberts, Dr. Lawrence G. (May 1995)."The ARPANET & Computer Networks".Archived fromthe originalon 24 March 2016.Retrieved13 April2016.
  25. ^Pelkey, James L. (May 27, 1988)."Interview of Donald Davies"(PDF).
  26. ^abDavies, D. W. (1966)."Proposal for a Digital Communication Network"(PDF).all users of the network will provide themselves with some kind of error control... Computer developments in the distant future might result in one type of network being able to carry speech and digital messages efficiently.
  27. ^Scantlebury, R. A.; Bartlett, K. A. (April 1967),A Protocol for Use in the NPL Data Communications Network,Private papers
  28. ^abcDavies, Donald; Bartlett, Keith; Scantlebury, Roger; Wilkinson, Peter (October 1967).A Digital Communication Network for Computers Giving Rapid Response at remote Terminals(PDF).ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles.Archived(PDF)from the original on 2022-10-10.Retrieved2020-09-15.
  29. ^Yates, David M. (1997).Turing's Legacy: A History of Computing at the National Physical Laboratory 1945-1995.National Museum of Science and Industry. p. 130.ISBN978-0-901805-94-2.
  30. ^Davies, D. W.(17 March 1986),Oral History 189: D. W. Davies interviewed by Martin Campbell-Kelly at the National Physical Laboratory,Charles Babbage Institute University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, archived fromthe originalon 29 July 2014,retrieved21 July2014
  31. ^"UK National Physical Laboratories, Donald Davies".LivingInternet.Retrieved2024-06-05.
  32. ^Hafner, Katie; Lyon, Matthew (1996).Where wizards stay up late: the origins of the Internet.Internet Archive. Simon & Schuster. pp. 76–78.ISBN978-0-684-81201-4.Roger Scantlebury... from Donald Davies' team... presented a detailed design study for a packet switched network. It was the first Roberts had heard of it.... Roberts also learned from Scantlebury, for the first time, of the work that had been done by Paul Baran at RAND a few years earlier.
  33. ^Moschovitis 1999,p.58-9More significantly, Roger Scantlebury... presents the design for a packet-switched network. This is the first Roberts and Taylor have heard of packet switching, a concept that appears to be a promising receipe for transmitting data through the ARPAnet.
  34. ^Hempstead, C.; Worthington, W., eds. (2005).Encyclopedia of 20th-Century Technology.Vol. 1, A–L. Routledge. p. 574.ISBN9781135455514.It was a seminal meeting as the NPL proposal illustrated how the communications for such a resource-sharing computer network could be realized.
  35. ^"On packet switching".Net History.Retrieved2024-01-08.[Scantlebury said] We referenced Baran's paper in our 1967 Gatlinburg ACM paper. You will find it in the References. Therefore I am sure that we introduced Baran's work to Larry (and hence the BBN guys).
  36. ^abNaughton, John (2015).A Brief History of the Future: The origins of the Internet.Hachette.ISBN978-1474602778.they lacked one vital ingredient. Since none of them had heard of Paul Baran they had no serious idea of how to make the system work. And it took an English outfit to tell them.... Larry Roberts paper was the first public presentation of the ARPANET concept as conceived with the aid of Wesley Clark... Looking at it now, Roberts paper seems extraordinarily, well, vague.
  37. ^Waldrop, M. Mitchell (2018).The Dream Machine.Stripe Press. pp. 285–6.ISBN978-1-953953-36-0.Scantlebury and his companions from the NPL group were happy to sit up with Roberts all that night, sharing technical details and arguing over the finer points.
  38. ^abcAbbate, Jane(2000).Inventing the Internet.MIT Press. pp. 37–8, 58–9.ISBN978-0262261333.The NPL group influenced a number of American computer scientists in favor of the new technique, and they adopted Davies's term "packet switching" to refer to this type of network. Roberts also adopted some specific aspects of the NPL design.
  39. ^"Oral-History:Donald Davies & Derek Barber".Retrieved13 April2016.the ARPA network is being implemented using existing telegraphic techniques simply because the type of network we describe does not exist. It appears that the ideas in the NPL paper at this moment are more advanced than any proposed in the USA
  40. ^Barber, Derek (Spring 1993)."The Origins of Packet Switching".The Bulletin of the Computer Conservation Society(5).ISSN0958-7403.Retrieved6 September2017.Roger actually convinced Larry that what he was talking about was all wrong and that the way that NPL were proposing to do it was right. I've got some notes that say that first Larry was sceptical but several of the others there sided with Roger and eventually Larry was overwhelmed by the numbers.
  41. ^Needham, Roger M. (2002-12-01)."Donald Watts Davies, C.B.E. 7 June 1924 – 28 May 2000".Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society.48:87–96.doi:10.1098/rsbm.2002.0006.S2CID72835589.Larry Roberts presented a paper on early ideas for what was to become ARPAnet. This was based on a store-and-forward method for entire messages, but as a result of that meeting the NPL work helped to convince Roberts that packet switching was the way forward.
  42. ^Rayner, David; Barber, Derek; Scantlebury, Roger; Wilkinson, Peter (2001).NPL, Packet Switching and the Internet.Symposium of the Institution of Analysts & Programmers 2001. Archived fromthe originalon 2003-08-07.Retrieved2024-06-13.The system first went 'live' early in 1969
  43. ^abJohn S, Quarterman; Josiah C, Hoskins (1986)."Notable computer networks".Communications of the ACM.29(10): 932–971.doi:10.1145/6617.6618.S2CID25341056.The first packet-switching network was implemented at the National Physical Laboratories in the United Kingdom. It was quickly followed by the ARPANET in 1969.
  44. ^abcHaughney Dare-Bryan, Christine (June 22, 2023).Computer Freaks(Podcast). Chapter Two: In the Air. Inc. Magazine. 35:55 minutes in.Leonard Kleinrock: Donald Davies... did make a single node packet switch before ARPA did
  45. ^abcC. Hempstead; W. Worthington (2005).Encyclopedia of 20th-Century Technology.Routledge.pp. 573–5.ISBN9781135455514.
  46. ^Campbell-Kelly, Martin (1987)."Data Communications at the National Physical Laboratory (1965-1975)".Annals of the History of Computing.9(3/4): 221–247.doi:10.1109/MAHC.1987.10023.S2CID8172150.
  47. ^abNeedham, R. M.(2002). "Donald Watts Davies, C.B.E. 7 June 1924 – 28 May 2000".Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society.48:87–96.doi:10.1098/rsbm.2002.0006.S2CID72835589.The 1967 Gatlinburg paper was influential on the development of ARPAnet, which might otherwise have been built with less extensible technology.... Davies was invited to Japan to lecture on packet switching.
  48. ^Clarke, Peter (1982).Packet and circuit-switched data networks(PDF)(PhD thesis). Department of Electrical Engineering, Imperial College of Science and Technology, University of London."As well as the packet switched network actually built at NPL for communication between their local computing facilities, some simulation experiments have been performed on larger networks. A summary of this work is reported in [69]. The work was carried out to investigate networks of a size capable of providing data communications facilities to most of the U.K.... Experiments were then carried out using a method of flow control devised by Davies [70] called 'isarithmic' flow control.... The simulation work carried out at NPL has, in many respects, been more realistic than most of the ARPA network theoretical studies."
  49. ^Pelkey, James."6.3 CYCLADES Network and Louis Pouzin 1971-1972".Entrepreneurial Capitalism and Innovation: A History of Computer Communications 1968-1988.Archived fromthe originalon 2021-06-17.Retrieved2020-02-03.
  50. ^Campbell-Kelly, Martin (Autumn 2008)."Pioneer Profiles: Donald Davies".Computer Resurrection(44).ISSN0958-7403.
  51. ^Wilkinson, Peter (2001).NPL Development of Packet Switching.Symposium of the Institution of Analysts & Programmers 2001. Archived fromthe originalon 2003-08-07.Retrieved2024-06-13.The feasibility studies continued with an attempt to apply queuing theory to study overall network performance. This proved to be intractable so we quickly turned to simulation.
  52. ^abHafner, Katie (2018-12-30)."Lawrence Roberts, Who Helped Design Internet's Precursor, Dies at 81".The New York Times.ISSN0362-4331.Retrieved2020-02-20.He decided to use packet switching as the underlying technology of the Arpanet; it remains central to the function of the internet. And it was Dr. Roberts's decision to build a network that distributed control of the network across multiple computers. Distributed networking remains another foundation of today's internet.
  53. ^Waldrop, M. Mitchell (2018).The Dream Machine.Stripe Press. pp. 285–6.ISBN978-1-953953-36-0.Oops. Roberts knew Baran slightly and had in fact had lunch with him during a visit to RAND the previous February. But he certainly didn't remember any discussion of networks. How could he have missed something like that?
  54. ^O'Neill, Judy (5 March 1990)."An Interview with PAUL BARAN"(PDF).p. 37.On Tuesday, 28 February 1967 I find a notation on my calendar for 12:00 noon Dr. L. Roberts.
  55. ^Pelkey, James."4.7 Planning the ARPANET: 1967-1968 in Chapter 4 - Networking: Vision and Packet Switching 1959 - 1968".The History of Computer Communications.Archived fromthe originalon December 23, 2022.RetrievedMay 9,2023.
  56. ^Press, Gil (January 2, 2015)."A Very Short History Of The Internet And The Web".Forbes.Archivedfrom the original on January 9, 2015.Retrieved2020-02-07.Roberts' proposal that all host computers would connect to one another directly... was not endorsed... Wesley Clark... suggested to Roberts that the network be managed by identical small computers, each attached to a host computer. Accepting the idea, Roberts named the small computers dedicated to network administration 'Interface Message Processors' (IMPs), which later evolved into today's routers.
  57. ^SRI Project 5890-1; Networking (Reports on Meetings),Stanford University, 1967, archived fromthe originalon February 2, 2020,retrieved2020-02-15,W. Clark's message switching proposal (appended to Taylor's letter of April 24, 1967 to Engelbart)were reviewed.
  58. ^abRoberts, Lawrence (1967)."Multiple computer networks and intercomputer communication"(PDF).Multiple Computer Networks and Intercomputer Communications.pp. 3.1–3.6.doi:10.1145/800001.811680.S2CID17409102.Thus the set of IMP's, plus the telephone lines and data sets would constitute a message switching network
  59. ^abcTanenbaum, Andrew S.; Wetherall, David (2011).Computer networks(PDF)(5th ed.). Boston Amsterdam: Prentice Hall. p. 57.ISBN978-0-13-212695-3.Roberts bought the idea and presented a some what vague paper about it at the ACM SIGOPS Symposium on Operating System Principles held in Gatlinburg, Tennessee in late 1967
  60. ^Waldrop, M. Mitchell (2018).The Dream Machine.Stripe Press. pp. 279, 284–5.ISBN978-1-953953-36-0.Roberts was already becoming known as the fastest man in the Pentagon.... And not for nothing was Larry Roberts known as the fastest man in the Pentagon. By the time they got to the airport, the decision had been made.... Once again, the fastest man in the Pentagon made his decision without hesitation
  61. ^ab"Shapiro: Computer Network Meeting of October 9–10, 1967".stanford.edu.Archived fromthe originalon 27 June 2015.
  62. ^"Computer Pioneers - Donald W. Davies".IEEE Computer Society.Retrieved2020-02-20.In 1965, Davies pioneered new concepts for computer communications in a form to which he gave the name "packet switching."... The design of the ARPA network (ArpaNet) was entirely changed to adopt this technique.
  63. ^"Pioneer: Donald Davies",Internet Hall of Fame "America’s Advanced Research Project Agency (ARPA), and the ARPANET received his network design enthusiastically and the NPL local network became the first two computer networks in the world using the technique."
  64. ^Isaacson, Walter (2014).The Innovators: How a Group of Hackers, Geniuses, and Geeks Created the Digital Revolution.Simon and Schuster. p. 246.ISBN9781476708690.
  65. ^Davies, D. W. (1966)."Proposal for a Digital Communication Network"(PDF).p. 10, 16.
  66. ^Heart, F.; McKenzie, A.; McQuillian, J.; Walden, D. (January 4, 1978).Arpanet Completion Report(PDF)(Technical report). Burlington, MA: Bolt, Beranek and Newman.pp. III-40-1
  67. ^"SRI Project 5890-1; Networking (Reports on Meetings). [1967]".web.stanford.edu.Archived fromthe originalon 2011-08-10.Retrieved2020-02-15.
  68. ^Hafner & Lyon 1996
  69. ^abAbbate, Janet (2000).Inventing the Internet.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.pp. 39, 57–58.ISBN978-0-2625-1115-5.Baran proposed a "distributed adaptive message-block network" [in the early 1960s]... Roberts recruited Baran to advise the ARPANET planning group on distributed communications and packet switching.... Roberts awarded a contract to Leonard Kleinrock of UCLA to create theoretical models of the network and to analyze its actual performance.
  70. ^Summary of ARPA ad hoc meeting,November 3, 1967,We propose that a working group of approximately four people devote some concentrated effort in the near future in defining the IMP precisely. This group would interact with the larger group from the earlier meetings from time to time. Tentatively we think that the core of this investigatory group would be Bhushan (MIT), Kleinrock (UCLA), Shapiro (SRI) and Westervelt (University of Michigan), along with a kibitzer's group, consisting of such people as Baran (Rand), Boehm (Rand), Culler (UCSB) and Roberts (ARPA).
  71. ^Judy O'Neill (1990),Oral history interview with Paul Baran,Charles Babbage Institute,hdl:11299/107101,BARAN: On Tuesday, 31 October 1967 I see a notation 9:30 AM to 2:00 PM for ARPA's (Elmer) Shapiro, (Barry) Boehm, (Len) Kleinrock, ARPA Network. On Monday, 13 November 1967 I see the following: Larry Roberts to abt (about?) lunch (time?). Art Bushkin = 1:00 PM. Here. Larry Roberts IMP Committee. On Thursday, 16 November 1967 I see 7 PM Kleinrock, UCLA - IMP Meeting.
  72. ^Meeting of the ARPA Computer Network Working Group at UCLA,November 16, 1967
  73. ^abHafner & Lyon 1996,pp.116, 149
  74. ^Pelkey, James L."6.1 The Communications Subnet: BBN 1969".Entrepreneurial Capitalism and Innovation: A History of Computer Communications 1968–1988.Kahn, the principal architect
  75. ^abRoberts, Lawrence G. (November 1978)."The Evolution of Packet Switching"(PDF).IEEE Invited Paper.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 31 December 2018.RetrievedSeptember 10,2017.Significant aspects of the network's internal operation, such as routing, flow control, software design, and network control were developed by a BBN team consisting of Frank Heart, Robert Kahn, Severo Omstein, William Crowther, and David Walden
  76. ^abF.E. Froehlich, A. Kent (1990).The Froehlich/Kent Encyclopedia of Telecommunications: Volume 1 - Access Charges in the U.S.A. to Basics of Digital Communications.CRC Press. p. 344.ISBN0824729005.Although there was considerable technical interchange between the NPL group and those who designed and implemented the ARPANET, the NPL Data Network effort appears to have had little fundamental impact on the design of ARPANET. Such major aspects of the NPL Data Network design as the standard network interface, the routing algorithm, and the software structure of the switching node were largely ignored by the ARPANET designers. There is no doubt, however, that in many less fundamental ways the NPL Data Network had and effect on the design and evolution of the ARPANET.
  77. ^RFC334
  78. ^RFC53
  79. ^Heart, F.; McKenzie, A.; McQuillian, J.; Walden, D. (January 4, 1978).Arpanet Completion Report(PDF)(Technical report). Burlington, MA: Bolt, Beranek and Newman. p. III-63.
  80. ^abcClarke, Peter (1982).Packet and circuit-switched data networks(PDF)(PhD thesis). Department of Electrical Engineering, Imperial College of Science and Technology, University of London."Many of the theoretical studies of the performance and design of the ARPA Network were developments of earlier work by Kleinrock... Although these works concerned message switching networks, they were the basis for a lot of the ARPA network investigations... The intention of the work of Kleinrock [in 1961] was to analyse the performance of store and forward networks... Kleinrock [in 1970] extended the theoretical approaches of [his 1961 work] to the early ARPA network."
  81. ^Abbate, Janet (1999).Inventing the Internet.Internet Archive. MIT Press. p. 230.ISBN978-0-262-01172-3.On Kleinrock's influence, see Frank, Kahn, and Kleinrock 1972, p. 265; Tanenbaum 1989, p. 631.
  82. ^Davies, Donald Watts (1979).Computer networks and their protocols.Internet Archive. Wiley. pp. See page refs highlighted at url.ISBN978-0-471-99750-4.
  83. ^Kleinrock, L. (1978)."Principles and lessons in packet communications".Proceedings of the IEEE.66(11): 1320–1329.doi:10.1109/PROC.1978.11143.ISSN0018-9219.
  84. ^Pelkey, James."8.3 CYCLADES Network and Louis Pouzin 1971–1972".Entrepreneurial Capitalism and Innovation: A History of Computer Communications 1968–1988.
  85. ^Hafner & Lyon 1996,p.222
  86. ^Pelkey, James."8.4 Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) 1973-1976".Entrepreneurial Capitalism and Innovation: A History of Computer Communications 1968–1988.Arpanet had its deficiencies, however, for it was neither a true datagram network nor did it provide end-to-end error correction.
  87. ^Pouzin, Louis (May 1975)."An integrated approach to network protocols".Proceedings of the May 19-22, 1975, national computer conference and exposition on - AFIPS '75.Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 701–707.doi:10.1145/1499949.1500100.ISBN978-1-4503-7919-9.S2CID1689917.
  88. ^abRoberts, Dr. Lawrence G. (November 1978)."The Evolution of Packet Switching"(PDF).IEEE Invited Paper.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on December 31, 2018.RetrievedSeptember 10,2017.
  89. ^Abbate, Janet(2000).Inventing the Internet.MIT Press. pp. 124–127.ISBN978-0-262-51115-5.In fact, CYCLADES, unlike ARPANET, had been explicitly designed to facilitate internetworking; it could, for instance, handle varying formats and varying levels of service
  90. ^Kim, Byung-Keun (2005).Internationalising the Internet the Co-evolution of Influence and Technology.Edward Elgar. pp. 51–55.ISBN1845426754.In addition to the NPL Network and the ARPANET, CYCLADES, an academic and research experimental network, also played an important role in the development of computer networking technologies
  91. ^Bennett, Richard (September 2009)."Designed for Change: End-to-End Arguments, Internet Innovation, and the Net Neutrality Debate"(PDF).Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. pp. 7, 11.Retrieved11 September2017.
  92. ^"The internet's fifth man".The Economist.2013-11-30.ISSN0013-0613.Retrieved2020-04-22.In the early 1970s Mr Pouzin created an innovative data network that linked locations in France, Italy and Britain. Its simplicity and efficiency pointed the way to a network that could connect not just dozens of machines, but millions of them. It captured the imagination of Dr Cerf and Dr Kahn, who included aspects of its design in the protocols that now power the internet.
  93. ^Moschovitis 1999,p.78-9
  94. ^Cerf, V.; Kahn, R. (1974)."A Protocol for Packet Network Intercommunication"(PDF).IEEE Transactions on Communications.22(5): 637–648.doi:10.1109/TCOM.1974.1092259.ISSN1558-0857.Archived(PDF)from the original on 2022-10-10.The authors wish to thank a number of colleagues for helpful comments during early discussions of international network protocols, especially R. Metcalfe, R. Scantlebury, D. Walden, and H. Zimmerman; D. Davies and L. Pouzin who constructively commented on the fragmentation and accounting issues; and S. Crocker who commented on the creation and destruction of associations.
  95. ^Cerf, Vinton; Dalal, Yogen; Sunshine, Carl (December 1974).Specification of Internet Transmission Control Protocol.IETF.doi:10.17487/RFC0675.RFC675.
  96. ^Postel, Jon (August 29, 1979)."Comparison of X.25 and TCP Version 4 as Cable-bus Network Protocols"(PDF).
  97. ^Camrass, R.; Gallager, R. (1978)."Encoding message lengths for data transmission (Corresp.)".IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.24(4): 495–496.doi:10.1109/TIT.1978.1055910.ISSN0018-9448.
  98. ^"Reflections on an Internet pioneer: Roger Camrass".stories.clare.cam.ac.uk.Retrieved2024-07-01.
  99. ^Cerf, Vinton G.; Postel, Jon (August 18, 1977)."Specification of Internetwork Transmission Program: TCP Version 3"(PDF).p. iii, 75-87.
  100. ^Postel, Jon (September 1978)."Specification of Internetwork Transmission Control Protocol: TCP Version 4"(PDF).pp. iii, 85–97.
  101. ^Cerf, Vinton G. (1 April 1980)."Final Report of the Stanford University TCP Project".
  102. ^Moschovitis 1999,p.78-9
  103. ^"ISI Names Dr. Paul Mockapetris Visiting Scholar"Archived2012-08-26 at theWayback Machine,Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, 27 March 2003
  104. ^"Congestion avoidance and control",Van Jacobson, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review - Special twenty-fifth anniversary issue, Highlights from 25 years of the Computer Communication Review, Volume 25 Issue 1, Jan. 1995, pp.157-187
  105. ^Andrew L. Russell (30 July 2013)."OSI: The Internet That Wasn't".IEEE Spectrum.Vol. 50, no. 8.
  106. ^Russell, Andrew L."Rough Consensus and Running Code' and the Internet-OSI Standards War"(PDF).IEEE Annals of the History of Computing.Archived(PDF)from the original on 2019-11-17.
  107. ^Davies, Howard; Bressan, Beatrice (2010)."The Protocol Wars".A History of International Research Networking: The People who Made it Happen.John Wiley & Sons. pp. 106–110.ISBN978-3-527-32710-2.
  108. ^"Leonard Kleinrock".Internet Hall of Fame.Retrieved2023-03-13.
  109. ^Davies, Donald Watts (1979).Computer networks and their protocols.Internet Archive. Wiley. pp. See page refs highlighted at url.ISBN978-0-471-99750-4.In mathematical modelling use is made of the theories of queueing processes and of flows in networks, describing the performance of the network in a set of equations.... The analytic method has been used with success by Kleinrock and others, but only if important simplifying assumptions are made.... It is heartening in Kleinrock's work to see the good correspondence achieved between the results of analytic methods and those of simulation.
  110. ^Davies, Donald Watts (1979).Computer networks and their protocols.Internet Archive. Wiley. pp. 110–111.ISBN978-0-471-99750-4.Hierarchical addressing systems for network routing have been proposed by Fultz and, in greater detail, by McQuillan. A recent very full analysis may be found in Kleinrock and Kamoun.
  111. ^Feldmann, Anja; Cittadini, Luca; Mühlbauer, Wolfgang; Bush, Randy; Maennel, Olaf (2009)."HAIR: Hierarchical architecture for internet routing"(PDF).Proceedings of the 2009 workshop on Re-architecting the internet.ReArch '09. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 43–48.doi:10.1145/1658978.1658990.ISBN978-1-60558-749-3.S2CID2930578.The hierarchical approach is further motivated by theoretical results (e.g., [16]) which show that, by optimally placing separators, i.e., elements that connect levels in the hierarchy, tremendous gain can be achieved in terms of both routing table size and update message churn.... [16] KLEINROCK, L., AND KAMOUN, F. Hierarchical routing for large networks: Performance evaluation and optimization. Computer Networks (1977).
  112. ^"Leonard Kleinrock".Internet Hall of Fame.Retrieved2023-03-13.
  113. ^"Kleinrock (Leonard) papers".oac.cdlib.org.Retrieved2023-04-04.
  114. ^Abbate, Janet (1999).Inventing the Internet.Internet Archive. MIT Press. p. 81.ISBN978-0-262-01172-3.
  115. ^Hayward, G.; Gottlieb, A.; Jain, S.; Mahoney, D. (October 1987). "CMOS VLSI Applications in Broadband Circuit Switching".IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.5(8): 1231–1241.doi:10.1109/JSAC.1987.1146652.ISSN1558-0008.
  116. ^Hui, J.; Arthurs, E. (October 1987). "A Broadband Packet Switch for Integrated Transport".IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.5(8): 1264–1273.doi:10.1109/JSAC.1987.1146650.ISSN1558-0008.
  117. ^Gibson, Jerry D. (2018).The Communications Handbook.CRC Press.ISBN9781420041163.
  118. ^Kirstein, Peter T. (2009). "The early history of packet switching in the UK".IEEE Communications Magazine.47(2): 18–26.doi:10.1109/MCOM.2009.4785372.S2CID34735326.It is more difficult to establish at this time, however, whether Larry intended to switch the fragments as independent packets in the ARPAnet before he heard of the NPL work; certainly he now claims that this was always his intention.
  119. ^technicshistory (2019-06-02)."ARPANET, Part 2: The Packet".Creatures of Thought.Retrieved2024-06-21.The above description of how packet-switching came to be is the most widely-accepted one. However, there is an alternative version. Roberts claimed in later years that by the time of the Gatlinburg symposium, he already had the basic concepts of packet-switching well in mind, and that they originated with his old colleague Len Kleinrock, who had written about them as early as 1962, as part of his Ph.D. research on communication nets. It requires a great deal of squinting to extract anything resembling packet-switching from Kleinrock's work, however, and no other contemporary textual evidence that I have come across backs the Kleinrock/Roberts account.
  120. ^Barry M. Leiner, Vinton G. Cerf, David D. Clark, Robert E. Kahn, Leonard Kleinrock, Daniel C. Lynch, Jon Postel, Larry G. Roberts, Stephen Wolff (1997),Brief History of the Internet,Internet Society{{citation}}:CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  121. ^abKatie Hafner (November 8, 2001),"A Paternity Dispute Divides Net Pioneers",New York Times,The Internet is really the work of a thousand people, "Mr. Baran said." And of all the stories about what different people have done, all the pieces fit together. It's just this one little case that seems to be an aberration.
  122. ^UCLA Computer Science Dept."Leonard Kleinrock, Professor (archived)".UCLA Computer Science Dept.Archived fromthe originalon Feb 27, 2004.Retrieved28 December2023.
  123. ^abcdIsaacson, Walter(2014).The Innovators: How a Group of Hackers, Geniuses, and Geeks Created the Digital Revolution.Simon & Schuster. pp. 244–6.ISBN9781476708690.
  124. ^Donald W. Davies (2001),"An Historical Study of the Beginnings of Packet Switching",The Computer Journal,I can find no evidence that he understood the principles of packet switching.
  125. ^abHarris, Trevor, University of Wales (2009). Pasadeos, Yorgo (ed.)."Who is the Father of the Internet? The Case for Donald Davies".Variety in Mass Communication Research.ATINER: 123–134.ISBN978-960-6672-46-0.Archived fromthe originalon May 2, 2022.Leonard Kleinrock and Lawrence (Larry) Roberts, neither of whom were directly involved in the invention of packet switching... Dr Willis H. Ware, Senior Computer Scientist and Research at the RAND Corporation, notes that Davies (and others) were troubled by what they regarded as in appropriate claims on the invention of packet switching{{cite journal}}:CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  126. ^Judy O'Neill (12 March 1990),Oral history interview with William Crowther,hdl:11299/107235,...there were all sorts of crazy ideas about, and most of them didn't make any sense. There was this 'hot potato' routing which somebody was advocating, which was just crazy.
  127. ^Alex McKenzie (2009),Comments on Dr. Leonard Kleinrock's claim to be "the Father of Modern Data Networking",retrievedApril 23,2015
  128. ^Robert Taylor(November 22, 2001),"Birthing the Internet: Letters From the Delivery Room; Disputing a Claim",New York Times
  129. ^Leonard Kleinrock,Leonard Kleinrock - UCLA Dept. of Computer Science,archived fromthe originalon December 5, 2023,He developed the mathematical theory of data networks, the technology underpinning the Internet, while a graduate student at MIT in the period from 1960-1962. In that work, he also modeled the packetization of messages and solved for a key performance gain that packetization provides.
  130. ^ab"Letters to the editor",IEEE Communications,February 2011,doi:10.1109/MCOM.2011.5706298
  131. ^Haughney Dare-Bryan, Christine (June 22, 2023).Computer Freaks(Podcast). Chapter Two: In the Air. Inc. Magazine.
  132. ^Norberg, Arthur L.; O'Neill, Judy E. (1996).Transforming computer technology: information processing for the Pentagon, 1962-1986.Johns Hopkins studies in the history of technology New series. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press. pp. 153–196.ISBN978-0-8018-5152-0.Prominently cites Baran and Davies as sources of inspiration, and nowhere mentions Kleinrock's work.
  133. ^A History of the ARPANET: The First Decade(PDF)(Report). Bolt, Beranek & Newman Inc. 1 April 1981. pp. 13, 53 of 183.Archivedfrom the original on 1 December 2012.Aside from the technical problems of interconnecting computers with communications circuits, the notion of computer networks had been considered in a number of places from a theoretical point of view. Of particular note was work done by Paul Baran and others at the Rand Corporation in a study "On Distributed Communications" in the early 1960's. Also of note was work done by Donald Davies and others at the National Physical Laboratory in England in the mid-1960's.... Another early major network development which affected development of the ARPANET was undertaken at the National Physical Laboratory in Middlesex, England, under the leadership of D. W. Davies.
  134. ^"Leonard Kleinrock".UCLA Samueli School Of Engineering.Retrieved2024-01-20.
  135. ^Russell, Andrew (2012).Histories of Networking vs. the History of the Internet(PDF).2012 SIGCIS Workshop. p. 6.
  136. ^abX.25 Virtual Circuits - TRANSPAC in France - Pre-Internet Data Networking,doi:10.1109/MCOM.2010.5621965,S2CID23639680
  137. ^Pildush, G."Interview with the author (of an MPLS-based VPN article)".Archived fromthe originalon 2007-09-29.
  138. ^Yates, David M. (1997).Turing's Legacy: A History of Computing at the National Physical Laboratory 1945-1995.National Museum of Science and Industry. pp. 132–34.ISBN978-0-901805-94-2.Davies's invention of packet switching and design of computer communication networks... were a cornerstone of the development which led to the Internet
  139. ^Feder, Barnaby J. (2000-06-04)."Donald W. Davies, 75, Dies; Helped Refine Data Networks".The New York Times.ISSN0362-4331.Retrieved2020-01-10.Donald W. Davies, who proposed a method for transmitting data that made the Internet possible
  140. ^Berners-Lee, Tim(1999),Weaving the Web: The Past, Present and Future of the World Wide Web by its Inventor,London: Orion, p.7,ISBN0-75282-090-7"The advances by Donald Davies, by Paul Baran, and by Vint Cerf, Bob Khan and colleagues had already happened in the 1970s but were only just becoming pervasive."
  141. ^Harris, Trevor, University of Wales (2009). Pasadeos, Yorgo (ed.)."Who is the Father of the Internet? The Case for Donald Davies".Variety in Mass Communication Research.ATINER: 123–134.ISBN978-960-6672-46-0.Archived fromthe originalon May 2, 2022.{{cite journal}}:CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  142. ^Archives, L. A. Times (2000-06-03)."Donald W. Davies; Work Led to the Internet".Los Angeles Times.Retrieved2024-01-21.
  143. ^"Treorchy internet pioneer Donald Davies honoured".BBC News.2013-07-25.Retrieved2024-07-01.[Davies] is widely known in America which continued his computer work
  144. ^abRoberts, Lawrence G. (November 1978)."The Evolution of Packet Switching"(PDF).IEEE Invited Paper.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 31 December 2018.RetrievedSeptember 10,2017.In nearly all respects, Davies' original proposal, developed in late 1965, was similar to the actual networks being built today.
  145. ^Moore, Roger D. (August 2006)."This is a temporary index for a collection of papers about packet-switching in the 1970s".Archived fromthe originalon 24 July 2017.Retrieved5 September2017.
  146. ^Kirstein, Peter T. (1973)."A SURVEY OF PRESENT AMD PLANNED GENERAL PURPOSE EUROPEAN DATA AND COMPUTER NETWORKS".Archived fromthe originalon 2 March 2017.Retrieved5 September2017.
  147. ^National Research Council (U.S.). National Research Network Review Committee, Leonard Kleinrock; et al. (1988).Toward a National Research Network.National Academies. p. 40.ISBN9780309581257.
  148. ^"A SURVEY OF THE CAPABILITIES OF 8 PACKET SWITCHING NETWORKS".1975. Archived fromthe originalon 26 April 2017.Retrieved5 September2017.Research in packet switching networks at the British National Physical Laboratory (NPL) predates ARPANET, having commenced in 1966.
  149. ^Taylor, Steve; Jim Metzler (2008)."Vint Cerf on why TCP/IP was so long in coming".Archived fromthe originalon 2013-06-21.Retrieved2013-08-30.
  150. ^abOppenheimer, Alan (January 2004)."A History of Macintosh Networking".MacWorld Expo.Archived fromthe originalon 2006-10-16.
  151. ^Sidhu, Gursharan; Andrews, Richard; Oppenheiner, Alan (1989).Inside AppleTalk(2 ed.). Addison-Wesley.ISBN0-201-55021-0.
  152. ^Titus, Tim."42 Dead Networking Technologies and What Killed Them".pathsolutions.Retrieved2023-09-23.
  153. ^Martel, C. C.; J. M. Cunningham; M. S. Grushcow."THE BNR NETWORK: A CANADIAN EXPERIENCE WITH PACKET SWITCHING TECHNOLOGY".IFIP Congress 1974.pp. 10–14. Archived fromthe originalon 2013-10-20.Retrieved2013-08-30.
  154. ^"A Technical History of CYCLADES".Technical Histories of the Internet & other Network Protocols.Computer Science Department, University of Texas Austin. Archived fromthe originalon 2013-09-01.
  155. ^Zimmermann, Hubert (August 1977)."The Cyclades Experience-Results and Impacts".IFIP Congress 1977.Toronto: 465–469.
  156. ^Digital Equipment Corporation, Nineteen Fifty-Seven to the Present(PDF),Digital Equipment Corporation, 1978, p. 53, archived fromthe original(PDF)on 2017-06-30
  157. ^Wood, David C. (1975)."A Survey of the Capabilities of 8 Packet Switching Networks".Proceedings of Symposium on Computer Networks.Archived fromthe originalon 2020-08-06.Retrieved2020-03-13.
  158. ^Barber, D L. (1975)."Cost project 11".ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review.5(3): 12–15.doi:10.1145/1015667.1015669.S2CID28994436.
  159. ^Scantlebury, Roger (1986)."X.25 - past, present and future".In Stokes, A. V. (ed.).Communications Standards: State of the Art Report.Pergamon. pp. 203–216.ISBN978-1-4831-6093-1.
  160. ^"EIN (European Informatics Network)".Computer History Museum.Retrieved2020-02-05.
  161. ^"European cooperation in the field of scientific and technical research (COST), 1971-".
  162. ^Abbate, Janet (2000).Inventing the Internet.MIT Press. p. 125.ISBN978-0-262-51115-5.
  163. ^Barber, D. L. A. and Laws, J. (February 1979). “A basic mail scheme for EIN,” International Network Working Group (INWG), Note no. 192.
  164. ^Davies, Donald Watts (1979).Computer networks and their protocols.John Wiley & Sons. pp.464.ISBN9780471997504.
  165. ^Hardy, Daniel; Malleus, Guy (2002).Networks: Internet, Telephony, Multimedia: Convergences and Complementarities.Springer Science & Business Media. p. 505.ISBN978-3-540-00559-9.
  166. ^Derek Barber."The Origins of Packet Switching".Computer Resurrection Issue 5.Retrieved2024-06-05.I actually set up the first meeting between John Wedlake of the British Post Office and [Rémi Després] of the French PTT which led to X25. There was a problem about virtual calls in EIN, so I called this meeting and that actually did in the end lead to X25.
  167. ^Beauchamp, K. G. (2012-12-06).Interlinking of Computer Networks: Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute held at Bonas, France, August 28 – September 8, 1978.Springer Science & Business Media. p. 55.ISBN978-94-009-9431-7.
  168. ^Davies, Howard; Bressan, Beatrice, eds. (2010).A history of international research networking: the people who made it happen.John Wiley & Sons. p. 2.ISBN978-3527327102.
  169. ^Smith, Ed; Miller, Chris; Norton, Jim."Packet Switching: The first steps on the road to the information society".
  170. ^Bright, Roy D.; Smith, Michael A. (1973)."EXPERIMENTAL PACKET SWITCHING PROJECT OF THE UK POST OFFICE".Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Computer Communication Networks.Sussex, United Kingdom: Noordhoff International Publishing. pp. 435–44. Archived fromthe originalon 2013-10-20.Retrieved2013-08-30.
  171. ^Pearson, DJ; Wilkin, D (1974)."Some Design Aspects of a public packet switching network".Proceedings of the 2nd ICCC 74.pp. 199–213. Archived fromthe originalon 2013-10-20.Retrieved2013-08-30.
  172. ^Schwartz, Mischa; Boorstyn, Rober R.; Pickholtz, Raymond L. (November 1972)."Terminal-Oriented Computer-Communication Networks".Proceedings of the IEEE.60(11): 1408–23.doi:10.1109/proc.1972.8912.Archived fromthe originalon 2013-10-20.Retrieved2013-08-30.
  173. ^Kirstein, Peter T. (1973)."A SURVEY OF PRESENT AND PLANNED GENERAL PURPOSE EUROPEAN DATA AND COMPUTER NETWORKS".Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Computer Communication Networks.Sussex, United Kingdom: Noordhoff International Publishing. Archived fromthe originalon 2013-10-20.Retrieved2013-08-30.
  174. ^"IPSANET Documents".Archived fromthe originalon 2021-02-25.Retrieved2020-10-22.
  175. ^Lee, Rich (1 March 1998)."Maintaining IPX Compatibility During a Migration to TCP/IP on a NetWare Network".Novell.Retrieved3 September2013.
  176. ^Merit receives administrative services under an agreement with theUniversity of Michigan.
  177. ^John Mulcahy (1989),A Chronicle of Merit's Early History,Ann Arbor, Michigan: Merit Network, archived fromthe originalon 2009-02-07
  178. ^abMerit Network Timeline: 1970–1979,Ann Arbor, Michigan: Merit Network, archived fromthe originalon 2016-01-01
  179. ^Merit Network Timeline: 1980–1989,Ann Arbor, Michigan: Merit Network, archived fromthe originalon 2016-01-01
  180. ^"Donald Davies".thocp.net.Archived fromthe originalon 2020-11-05.Retrieved2017-08-28.
  181. ^"Donald Davies".internethalloffame.org.
  182. ^Pelkey, James (2007),"NPL Network and Donald Davies 1966 - 1971",Entrepreneurial Capitalism and Innovation: A History of Computer Communications 1968-1988,archived fromthe originalon 29 November 2020,retrieved13 April2016
  183. ^Scantlebury, R. A.; Wilkinson, P.T. (1974)."The National Physical Laboratory Data Communications Network".Proceedings of the 2nd ICCC 74.pp. 223–228. Archived fromthe originalon 2013-10-20.Retrieved2013-08-30.
  184. ^Ward, Mark (October 29, 2009)."Celebrating 40 years of the net".BBC News.
  185. ^John S, Quarterman; Josiah C, Hoskins (1986)."Notable computer networks".Communications of the ACM.29(10): 932–971.doi:10.1145/6617.6618.S2CID25341056.The first packet-switching network was implemented at the National Physical Laboratories in the United Kingdom. It was quickly followed by the ARPANET in 1969.
  186. ^"The National Physical Laboratory Data Communications Netowrk".1974. Archived fromthe originalon 1 August 2020.Retrieved5 September2017.
  187. ^Cambell-Kelly, Martin (1987)."Data Communications at the National Physical Laboratory (1965-1975)".Annals of the History of Computing.9(3/4): 221–247.doi:10.1109/MAHC.1987.10023.S2CID8172150.Transmission of packets of data over the high-speed lines
  188. ^Guardian Staff (2013-06-25)."Internet pioneers airbrushed from history".The Guardian.ISSN0261-3077.Retrieved2020-07-31.This was the first digital local network in the world to use packet switching and high-speed links.
  189. ^Roberts, Lawrence G. (November 1978)."The evolution of packet switching"(PDF).Proceedings of the IEEE.66(11): 1307–13.doi:10.1109/PROC.1978.11141.S2CID26876676.Both Paul Baran and Donald Davies in their original papers anticipated the use of T1 trunks
  190. ^Mendicino, Samuel F. (1972)."1970 OCTOPUS: THE LAWRENCE RADIATION LABORATORY NETWORK".Computer Networks.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall Inc.: 95–100. Archived fromthe originalon 2013-10-20.Retrieved2013-08-30.
  191. ^Pehrson, David L. (1970)."AN ENGINEERING VIEW OF THE LRL OCTOPUS COMPUTER NETWORK".
  192. ^Fletcher, John G. (1975)."Principles of Design in the Octopus Computer network".
  193. ^Burnett, D.J.; Sethi, H.R. (1977)."Packet Switching at Philips Research Laboratories".Computer Networks.1(6): 341–348.doi:10.1016/0376-5075(77)90010-1.Archived fromthe originalon 2013-10-20.Retrieved2013-08-30.
  194. ^David R. Boggs;John F. Shoch;Edward A. Taft;Robert M. Metcalfe(April 1980). "Pup: An Internetwork Architecture".IEEE Transactions on Communications.28(4): 612–624.doi:10.1109/TCOM.1980.1094684.S2CID62684407.
  195. ^ab"Discussion of Technical Choices made for TRANSPAC"(PDF).
  196. ^Després, R.(1974)."RCP, THE EXPERIMENTAL PACKET-SWITCHED DATA TRANSMISSION SERVICE OF THE FRENCH PTT".Proceedings of ICCC 74.pp. 171–85. Archived fromthe originalon 2013-10-20.Retrieved2013-08-30.
  197. ^Bache, A.; Matras, Y. (1976)."Fundamental Choices in the Development of RCP, the Experimental Packet-Switching Data Transmission Service of the French PTT".Proceedings of ICCC 76.pp. 311–16. Archived fromthe originalon 2013-10-20.Retrieved2013-08-30.
  198. ^Bache, A.; L. Guillou; H. Layec; B. Long; Y. Matras (1976)."RCP, the Experimental Packet-Switched Data Transmission Service of the French PTT: History, Connections, Control".Proceedings of ICCC 76.Archived fromthe originalon 2013-10-20.Retrieved2013-08-30.
  199. ^Alarcia, G.; Herrera, S. (1974)."C.T.N.E.'s PACKET SWITCHING NETWORK. ITS APPLICATIONS".Proceedings of 2nd ICCC 74.pp. 163–170. Archived fromthe originalon 2013-10-20.Retrieved2013-08-30.
  200. ^Cuenca, L. (1980)."A Public Packet Switching Data Communications Network: Eight Years of Operating Experience".Conference Record of ICC 80.IEEE. pp. 39.3.1–39.3.5. Archived fromthe originalon 2013-10-20.Retrieved2013-08-30.
  201. ^Lavandera, Luis (1980)."Architecture, Protocols and Performance of RETD".Conference Record of ICC 80.IEEE. pp. 28.4.1–28.4.5. Archived fromthe originalon 2013-10-20.Retrieved2013-08-30.
  202. ^Derek Barber."The Origins of Packet Switching".Computer Resurrection Issue 5.Retrieved2024-06-05.The Spanish, dark horses, were the first people to have a public network. They'd got a bank network which they craftily turned into a public network overnight, and beat everybody to the post.
  203. ^Haarala, Arja-Riitta (2001). "The Role of Libraries in Information Management in Finnish University Setting".Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of European University Information Systems.doi:10.18452/1040.
  204. ^Chretien, G.J.; Konig, W.M.; Rech, J.H. (1973)."The SITA Network".Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Computer Communication Networks.Sussex, United Kingdom: Noordhoff International Publishing. pp. 373–396. Archived fromthe originalon 2013-10-20.
  205. ^"Interview of Donald Davies"(PDF).
  206. ^Rutter, Dorian (2005).From Diversity to Convergence: British Computer Networks and the Internet, 1970-1995(PDF)(Computer Science thesis). The University of Warwick.Archived(PDF)from the original on 2022-10-10.
  207. ^Powell, Kit (1980-07-01)."Evolution of networks using standard protocols".Computer Communications.3(3): 117–122.doi:10.1016/0140-3664(80)90069-9.ISSN0140-3664.
  208. ^Kirstein, Peter T. (Jan–Mar 1999)."Early Experiences with the ARPANET and INTERNET in the UK"(PDF).IEEE Annals of the History of Computing.21(1).doi:10.1109/85.759368.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 10 August 2017.Retrieved18 May2020.
  209. ^Wells, Mike (1988-11-01)."JANET-the United Kingdom Joint Academic Network".Serials.1(3): 28–36.doi:10.1629/010328.ISSN1475-3308.
  210. ^Reid, Jim (3 April 2007)."The Good Old Days: Networking in UK Academia ~25 Years Ago"(PDF).UKNOF7.Manchester. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 28 May 2008.Retrieved16 April2008.
  211. ^"6th UK Network Operators' Forum Meeting Agenda".uknof.org.uk.Archived fromthe originalon 2007-06-21.Retrieved2020-02-12.See "15:00 Starting the Commercial Internet in the UK (Peter Houlder)"
  212. ^Sundstrom, R.J.; G.D. Schultz (1980)."1980 SNA'S First Six Years: 1974-1980".Proceedings of 5th ICCC 80.pp. 578–585. Archived fromthe originalon 2013-10-20.
  213. ^Johnson, Timothy (May 13, 1976). "Electronic post for switching data".New Scientist.
  214. ^Mathison, S.L.; Roberts, L.G.; Walker, P.M. (May 2012)."The history of telenet and the commercialization of packet switching in the U.S."IEEE Communications Magazine.50(5): 28–45.doi:10.1109/MCOM.2012.6194380.S2CID206453987.
  215. ^Andrew Colley (28 January 2004)."Telstra drops Austpac; reaches for finance market".ZDNet.Retrieved21 December2018.
  216. ^Maidasani, Dinesh (June 2009).Straight To The Point - Networking.Laxmi Publications Pvt Limited.ISBN9788131805299.
  217. ^Smith, Christopher A. (1985).Technology for Disabled Persons: Conference Papers, Discovery '84, October 1-3, 1984, Chicago, Illinois.Materials Development Center, Stout Vocational Rehabilitation Institute, University of Wisconsin-Stout. p. 195.ISBN978-0-916671-61-7.Retrieved12 January2022.
  218. ^Rucker, Chauncy N.; And Others (1985).Establishing a Computer Network for Connecticut.
  219. ^Steneker, H.J. (16 May 1991)."Graduation Report on X.25 data services in GSM network"(PDF).Electrical Engineering -TUE.p. 20.Archived(PDF)from the original on 2022-10-10.Retrieved15 June2011.
  220. ^Rybczynski, Tony (11 December 2009)."Commercialization of packet switching (1975-1985): A Canadian perspective [History of Communications]".IEEE Communications Magazine.Vol. 47, no. 12. pp. 26–31.doi:10.1109/MCOM.2009.5350364.Retrieved12 January2022.
  221. ^Parodi, Roberto (1992).Towards a New World in Computer Communication: Eleventh International Conference on Computer Communication, Genova, Italy, 1992: Proceedings of the Conference.IOS Press.ISBN978-90-5199-110-9.
  222. ^Telecommunications Directory.Gale Research. 2000. p. 593.ISBN978-0-7876-3352-3.
  223. ^Gareth Locksley (1990).The Single European Market and the Information and Communication Technologies.Belhaven Press. p. 194.ISBN978-1-85293-101-8.
  224. ^"Eircom Plc and the Department of Agriculture and Food; Mr Mark Henry and the Department of Agriculture and Food; Eircom Plc and the Department of Finance and Eircom Plc and Office of the Revenue Commissioners. | [2000] IEIC 98114 | Irish Information Commissioner | Judgment | Law | CaseMine".Archivedfrom the original on 2022-06-21.Retrieved2022-06-22.
  225. ^Dunning, A.J. (1977-12-31). "Origins, development and future of the Euronet".Program.11(4). Emeraldinsight: 145–155.doi:10.1108/eb046759.
  226. ^Kerssens, Niels (2020)."Rethinking legacies in internet history: Euronet, lost (inter)networks, EU politics".Internet Histories.4:32–48.doi:10.1080/24701475.2019.1701919.ISSN2470-1475.
  227. ^Tomaru, K.; T. Kato; S.I. Yamaguchi (1980)."A Private Packet Network and Its Application in A Worldwide Integrated Communication Network".Proceedings of ICCC '80.pp. 517–22. Archived fromthe originalon 2013-10-20.Retrieved2013-08-30.
  228. ^Infante, Jorge,El Desarrollo de la Red Publica de Datos en Espana (1971-1991): Un Caso de Avance Technologico en Condiciones Adversas(PDF),archived fromthe original(PDF)on 2010-04-05
  229. ^"1984-2014: 30 years of the Janet network"(PDF).Disc.Archived(PDF)from the original on 2022-10-10.Retrieved23 September2017.
  230. ^Wells, Mike (1988-11-01)."JANET-the United Kingdom Joint Academic Network".Serials.1(3): 28–36.doi:10.1629/010328.ISSN1475-3308.
  231. ^"REXPAC-A Brazilian Packet Switching Data Network".2017-06-09. Archived fromthe originalon 2017-06-09.Retrieved2022-08-30.
  232. ^"SITA History".About SITA > What we do.SITA.Archivedfrom the original on 19 August 2012.Retrieved16 August2012.
  233. ^Rybczynski, Tony (2009). "Commercialization of packet switching (1975–1985): A Canadian perspective [History of Communications]".IEEE Communications Magazine.47(12): 26–31.doi:10.1109/MCOM.2009.5350364.S2CID23243636.
  234. ^"Airline Control System".IBM.
  235. ^Epstein, Nadine (1986-03-09)."Et Voila! Le Minitel".The New York Times.
  236. ^TYMES, LA ROY W."TYMNET — A terminal oriented communication network".Proceedings of the SJCC 1971.Vol. 38. pp. 211–16. Archived fromthe originalon 2013-05-09.Retrieved2013-08-30.
  237. ^TYMES, LA ROY W. (April 1981)."Routing and Flow Control in TYMNET".IEEE Transactions on Communications.COM-29 (4): 392–98.doi:10.1109/tcom.1981.1095020.Archived fromthe originalon 2013-10-20.Retrieved2013-08-30.
  238. ^"UNINETT Packet Switched Network Connecting Universities and Research Institutes in Norway".2017-06-09. Archived fromthe originalon 2017-06-09.Retrieved2022-08-30.
  239. ^"KDDI to Close VENUS-P International Public Data Communications Service".KDDI.9 November 2005. Archived fromthe originalon 2013-09-04.Retrieved3 September2013.
  240. ^"Xerox System Integration Standard - Internet Transport Protocols".Xerox.Stamford. 1981.
  241. ^"Chapter 12: Xerox Network Systems".AIX Version 4.3 Communications Programming Concepts.October 1997.{{cite book}}:|website=ignored (help)
  242. ^Mike C. Smith (7 September 2017)."What is Dedicated Internet Access?".Archivedfrom the original on 21 December 2018.Retrieved21 December2018.
  243. ^"The Internet—From Modest Beginnings".NSF website.Archived fromthe originalon August 28, 2011.RetrievedSeptember 30,2011.
  244. ^Douglas Comer(October 1983)."History and overview of CSNET".Communications.26(10): 747–753.doi:10.1145/358413.358423.S2CID11943330.
  245. ^"About Internet2".Retrieved2009-06-26.
  246. ^Reardon, Marguerite (October 11, 2004)."Optical networking: The next generation".CNET.Archived fromthe originalon 10 July 2012.
  247. ^Jesdanun, Anick (October 11, 2007)."Speedy Internet2 gets 10x boost".USA Today.Retrieved26 June2009.
  248. ^"NSFNET: The Partnership That Changed The World".November 2007.
  249. ^Harris, Susan R.; Gerich, Elise (April 1996)."Retiring the NSFNET Backbone Service: Chronicling the End of an Era".ConneXions.Archived fromthe originalon 2013-08-17.
  250. ^Gale, Doug (29 November 2007)."NSFNET: The Community"(PDF).NSFNET: The Partnership That Changed The World.Archived(PDF)from the original on 2022-10-10.
  251. ^Aupperle, Eric M. (1998)."Merit–Who, What, and Why, Part One: The Early Years, 1964-1983"(PDF).Merit Network, Inc., in Library Hi Tech.Archived(PDF)from the original on 2013-04-23.
  252. ^"Merit Internet".Retrieved2023-06-05.
  253. ^"BBN to operate NEARnet".MIT News.14 July 1993.
  254. ^"About NorthWestNet".NorthWestNet User Services Internet Resource Guide, NorthWestNet Academic Computing Consortium, Inc.24 March 1992.Retrieved3 July2012.
  255. ^Michael Feldman (October 28, 2008)."National LambdaRail Opens for Business".HPCwire.RetrievedJune 6,2013.
  256. ^"About NLR".National LambdaRail.3 September 2013. Archived fromthe originalon 2013-09-04.
  257. ^"International TransPAC2 Inaugurated".Archived fromthe originalon 20 June 2013.,HPC Wire,8 April 2005.
  258. ^"TransPAC3 - Asia-US High Performance International Networking".International Research Network Connections Program (IRNC), U.S. National Science Foundation, October 2011.Archived fromthe originalon 14 August 2013.Retrieved3 September2013.
  259. ^"NSF Solicitation 93-52-Network Access Point Manager, Routing Arbiter, Regional Network Providers, and Very High Speed Backbone Network Services Provider for NSFNET and the NREN(SM) Program".May 6, 1993. Archived fromthe originalon 2016-03-05.
  260. ^Jamison, John; Nicklas, Randy; Miller, Greg; Thompson, Kevin; Wilder, Rick; Cunningham, Laura; Song, Chuck (July 1998)."vBNS: not your father's Internet".IEEE Spectrum.35(7): 38–46.doi:10.1109/6.694354.
  261. ^"MCI WorldCom Introduces Next Generation vBNS+ For All Higher Education And Research Organizations".Verizon Business News.June 23, 1999.
  262. ^"Verizon and MCI Close Merger, Creating a Stronger Competitor for Advanced Communications Services".Verizon Business News.January 6, 2006.
  263. ^"vBNS+".Verizon Business.

Bibliography

edit

Primary sources

edit

Further reading

edit
  • Pelkey, James L.; Russell, Andrew L.; Robbins, Loring G. (2022).Circuits, Packets, and Protocols: Entrepreneurs and Computer Communications, 1968-1988.Morgan & Claypool.ISBN978-1-4503-9729-2.
  • Russell, Andrew L. (2014).Open Standards and the Digital Age: History, Ideology, and Networks.Cambridge University Press.ISBN978-1-139-91661-5.
edit