Poshlostorposhlost'(Russian:по́шлость,IPA:[ˈpoʂləsʲtʲ]) is a Russian word for a particular negative human character trait or man-made thing or idea. It has been cited as an example of a so-calleduntranslatableword, as there is no single exact one-word English equivalent. The major flavors of the word are in the wide range: "amorality", "vulgarity", "banality", "tastelessness".[1]It carries much cultural baggage inRussiaand has been discussed at length by various writers.

It is derived from the adjectivepóšlyj(пошлый).

Description

edit

It has been defined as "petty evil or self-satisfiedvulgarity",[2]whileSvetlana Boym[3]defines it briefly as "obscenityand bad taste ".

Boym goes on to describe it at more length:[4]

Poshlost'is the Russian version of banality, with a characteristic national flavoring of metaphysics and high morality, and a peculiar conjunction of the sexual and the spiritual. This one word encompasses triviality, vulgarity, sexual promiscuity, and a lack of spirituality. The war againstposhlost'was a cultural obsession of the Russian and Soviet intelligentsia from the 1860s to 1960s.

In his novels,Turgenev"tried to develop a heroic figure who could, with the verve and abandon of aDon Quixote,grapple with the problems of Russian society, who could once and for all overcome 'poshlost', the complacent mediocrity and moral degeneration of his environment ".[5]Dostoyevskyapplied the word to theDevil;Solzhenitsyn,to Western-influenced young people.[4]

D. S. Mirskywas an early user of the word in English in writing about Gogol; he defined it as "'self-satisfied inferiority,' moral and spiritual".[6]Vladimir Nabokovmade it more widely known in his book on Gogol, where he romanized it as "poshlust"(punningly:"posh"+"lust").Poshlust,Nabokov explained, "is not only the obviously trashy but mainly the falsely important, the falsely beautiful, the falsely clever, the falsely attractive. A list of literary characters personifyingposhlustwill include... Polonius and the royal pair inHamlet,Rodolphe and Homais fromMadame Bovary,Laevsky inChekhov's 'The Duel',Joyce'sMarion [Molly] Bloom,young Bloch inSearch of Lost Time,Maupassant's 'Bel Ami',Anna Karenina's husband, and Berg inWar and Peace".[7]Nabokov also listed:[8]

Corny trash, vulgar clichés,Philistinismin all its phases, imitations of imitations, bogus profundities, crude, moronic and dishonest pseudo-literature—these are obvious examples. Now, if we want to pin down poshlost in contemporary writing we must look for it in Freudian symbolism, moth-eaten mythologies, social comment, humanistic messages, political allegories, overconcern with class or race, and the journalistic generalities we all know.

Azar Nafisimentions it and quotes the "falsely" definition inReading Lolita in Tehran.[9][clarification needed]

Nabokov often targetedposhlostin his own work; the Alexandrov definition above of "petty evil or self-satisfied vulgarity" refers to the character of M'sieur Pierre in Nabokov'sInvitation to a Beheading.

Another literary treatment isFyodor Sologub's novelThe Petty Demon.It tells the story of a provincial schoolteacher, Peredonov, notable for his complete lack of redeeming human qualities.James H. Billington[10]said of it:

The book puts on display aFreudiantreasure chest of perversions with subtlety and credibility. The name of the novel's hero, Peredonov, became a symbol of calculatingconcupiscencefor an entire generation... [Peredonov] seeks not the ideal world but the world of petty venality and sensualism,poshlost'.He torments his students, derives erotic satisfaction from watching them kneel to pray, and systematically befouls his apartment before leaving it as part of his generalized spite against the universe.

References

edit
  1. ^Mikheev, Alexey (29 May 2014)."A question of taste: The untranslatable word 'poshlost'".Russia Beyond The Headlines.Retrieved12 February2016.
  2. ^Alexandrov 1991,p. 106.
  3. ^Boym 2001,p. 279.
  4. ^abBoym 1994,p. 41.
  5. ^Lindstrom 1966,p. 149.
  6. ^Mirsky 1927,p. 158.
  7. ^Nabokov 1944,p. 70. Brackets added.
  8. ^Nabokov 1973.
  9. ^"Books",The Guardian(review),UK.
  10. ^Billington 1966,p. 494.

Bibliography

edit