This article has multiple issues.Please helpimprove itor discuss these issues on thetalk page.(Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Aprince-bishopis abishopwho is also the civil ruler of somesecularprincipality andsovereignty,as opposed toPrince of the Churchitself, a title associated withcardinals.Since 1951, the sole extant prince-bishop has been theBishop of Urgell,Catalonia, who has remainedex officioone of twoco-princes of Andorra,along with theFrench president.[1][2]
Overview
editIn the West, with the decline ofimperial powerfrom the 4th century onwards in the face of thebarbarianinvasions, sometimesChristianbishops ofcitiestook the place of the Roman commander, made secular decisions for the city and led their own troops when necessary. Later relations between a prince-bishop and theburgherswere invariably not cordial. As cities demanded charters from emperors, kings, or their prince-bishops and declared themselves independent of the secular territorial magnates, friction intensified between burghers and bishops. The principality orprince-bishopric (Hochstift)ruled politically by a prince-bishop could wholly or largely have overlapped with his diocesan jurisdiction, but some parts of hisdiocese,even the city of his residence, could have been exempt from his civil rule, obtaining the status offree imperial city.If theepiscopal seewas anarchbishopric,the correct term was prince-archbishop; the equivalent in the regular (monastic) clergy wasprince-abbot.A prince-bishop was usually considered anelected monarch.With the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire in 1806, the title finally became defunct in theConfederation of the Rhine.However, in respect to the lands of the formerHoly Roman Empireoutside of French control, such as theHabsburg Monarchy,including Austria proper (Salzburg,Seckau), theLands of the Bohemian Crown(the bulk ofOlomoucand parts ofBreslau), as well as in respect to the parts of the1795-partitioned Polish state,including those forming part of theKingdom of Galicia and Lodomeriaor those acquired by theKingdom of Prussia,the position continued in some cases nominally and was sometimes transformed into a new, titular type, initially recognized by the German Empire and Austria-Hungary until their demise, with the title ultimately abolished altogether by the pope in 1951.
The sole exception is theBishop of Urgell,Catalonia, who no longer has any secular rights in Spain, but remainsex officioone of twoco-princes of Andorra,along with the French head of state (currently itsPresident), and thus the last extant prince-bishop.[1][2]
In theByzantine Empire,the stillautocraticEmperors passed general legal measures assigning all bishops certain rights and duties in the secular administration of their dioceses, possibly as part of a development to put theEastern Churchin the service of the Empire[citation needed],with itsEcumenical Patriarchalmost reduced to the Emperor's minister of religious affairs.[citation needed].The institution of prince-bishop was revived in the Orthodox Church in the modern times during the existence of thePrince-Bishopric of Montenegro.
History
editHoly Roman Empire
editBishops had been involved in the government of the Frankish realm and subsequentCarolingian Empirefrequently as the clerical member of a duo of envoys styledMissus dominicus,but that was an individual mandate, not attached to the see. Prince-bishoprics were most common in the feudally fragmentedHoly Roman Empire,where many were formally awarded the rank of anImperial PrinceReichsfürst,granting them theimmediatepower over a certain territory and a representation in theImperial Diet(Reichstag).
Thestem duchiesof theGerman Kingdominside the Empire had strong and powerfuldukes(originally, war-rulers), always looking out more for theirduchy's "national interest"than for the Empire's. In turn the firstOttonian(Saxon) kingHenry the Fowlerand more so his son, EmperorOtto I,intended to weaken the power of the dukes by granting loyal bishops Imperial lands and vest them withregaliaprivileges. Unlike dukes they could not pass hereditary titles and lands to any descendants. Instead the Emperors reserved the implementation of the bishops of theirproprietary churchfor themselves, defying the fact that according tocanon lawthey were part of the transnationalCatholic Church.This met with increasing opposition by thePopes,culminating in the fierceInvestiture Controversyof 1076. Nevertheless, the Emperors continued to grant major territories to the most important (arch)bishops. The immediate territory attached to the episcopal see then became a prince-diocese or (arch)bishopric (Fürst(erz)bistum).[3]The German termHochstiftwas often used to denote the form of secular authority held by bishops ruling a prince-bishopric withErzstiftbeing used for prince-archbishoprics.
EmperorCharles IVby theGolden Bull of 1356confirmed the privileged status of the Prince-Archbishoprics ofMainz,CologneandTrieras members of theelectoralcollege. At the eve of theProtestant Reformation,theImperial statescomprised 53 ecclesiastical principalities. They were finally secularized in the 1803German Mediatizationupon the territorial losses toFrancein theTreaty of Lunéville,except for the Mainz prince-archbishop and German archchancellorKarl Theodor Anton Maria von Dalberg,who continued to rule asPrince of AschaffenburgandRegensburg.With the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire in 1806, the title finally became defunct in the successorConfederation of the Rhine.
No less than three of the (originally only seven)prince-electors,the highest order ofReichsfürsten(comparable in rank with the Frenchpairs), were prince-archbishops, each holding the title ofArchchancellor(the only arch-office amongst them) for a part of the Empire; given the higher importance of an electorate, their principalities were known asKurfürstentum( "electoral principality" ) rather than prince-archbishopric.
Arms | Name | Rank | Local name(s) | Imperial immediacy | Imperial Circle |
Modern nation |
Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Augsburg | Bishopric | German:Hochstift Augsburg | c. 888–1803 | Swabian | Germany | Augsburgbecame a Free Imperial City in 1276. | |
Bamberg | Bishopric | German:Hochstift Bamberg | 1245–1802 | Franconian | Germany | ||
Basel | Bishopric | French:Principauté de Bâle German:Fürstbistum Basel |
1032–1803 | Upper Rhenish | France Germany Switzerland |
Baseljoined theOld Swiss Confederacyas theCanton of Baselin 1501. Secularized as a result ofSwiss Mediation.A tiny fraction of the bishopric is not now in Switzerland:SchliengenandIsteinare both now in Germany; a very small part of theVogtei of St Ursanneis now in France. | |
Brandenburg | Bishopric | German:Hochstift Brandenburg | c. 1165–1598 | Upper Saxon | Germany | Founded in 948; annihilated 983; re-establishedc. 1161.Continued by Lutheran administrators after the Reformation in 1520; secularized and incorporated into theMargraviate of Brandenburgin 1571. | |
Bremen | Archbishopric | German:Erzstift Bremen | 1180–1648 | Lower Saxon | Germany | Continued byLutheran administratorsfrom the Reformation in 1566 until 1645/1648.Bremenitself became autonomous in 1186, and was confirmed as a Free Imperial City in 1646. | |
Breslau(Duchy of Nysa) | Bishopric | Czech:Niské knížectví German:Fürstentum/Herzogtum Neisse Polish:Księstwo Nyskie |
fief of the Bohemian crown,after 1748 also of theKingdom of Prussia | None | Poland Czech Republic (temporal and diocesan territory) Germany (diocesan territory only) |
Ceded 1335/1348 by Poland. After dissolution of the HRE, secularized in 1810 (Prussian part) and in 1850 (Austrian part). The princely title continued until 1951, elevated to archbishopric 1930 | |
Brixen | Bishopric | German:Hochstift Brixen Italian:Principato vescovile di Bressanone |
1027–1803 | Austrian | Italy | secularizedtoTyrol | |
Cambrai | Bishopric, then archbishopric | French:Principauté de Cambrai German:Hochstift Kammerich |
1007–1678 | Lower Rhenish / Westphalian | France | ToFranceby 1678Peace of Nijmegen | |
Chur | Bishopric | German:Bistum Chur Romansh:Chapitel catedral da Cuira Italian:Principato vescovile di Coira |
831/1170–1526 | Austrian | Switzerland Liechtenstein |
Secularized 1803 as a result ofSwiss Mediation. | |
Cologne | Archbishopric electorate | German:Erzstift Köln, Kurköln | 953–1803 | Electoral Rhenish | Germany | Prince-electorand Arch-Chancellor ofItaly.Duke of Westphaliafrom 1180.Colognebecame aFree Imperial Cityin 1288. | |
Constance | Bishopric | German:Hochstift Konstanz | 1155–1803 | Swabian | Austria Germany Switzerland |
Greatly reduced during theReformation,when significant parts of Swabia and Switzerland became Protestant. | |
Eichstätt | Bishopric | German:Hochstift Eichstätt | 1305–1802 | Franconian | Germany | ||
Freising | Bishopric | German:Hochstift Freising | 1294–1802 | Bavarian | Austria Germany |
||
Fulda | Abbey, then bishopric | German:Reichskloster Fulda, Reichsbistum Fulda | 1220–1802 | Upper Rhenish | Germany | Imperial Abbeyuntil 5 October 1752, when it was raised to a bishopric. Secularized in 1802 in theGerman Mediatization | |
Geneva | Bishopric | French:Évêché de Genève German:Fürstbistum Genf |
1154-1526 | Upper Rhenish | France Switzerland |
De jurereichsfreisince 1154.De factodominated by their guardians, thecounts of Geneva(until 1400) andSavoy(from 1401).Genevajoined theOld Swiss Confederacyin 1526. | |
Halberstadt | Bishopric | German:Bistum Halberstadt | 1180–1648 | Lower Saxon | Germany | ||
Havelberg | Bishopric | German:Bistum Havelberg | 1151–1598 | Lower Saxon | Germany | Founded in 948; annihilated 983; re-established 1130. Continued by Lutheran administrators from Reformation in 1548 until 1598 | |
Hildesheim | Bishopric | German:Hochstift Hildesheim | 1235–1803 | Lower Saxon | Germany | ||
Lausanne | Bishopric | French:Principauté épiscopale de Lausanne German:Bistum Lausanne |
1270–1536 | None | Switzerland | Conquered by theSwisscity canton ofBernin 1536. | |
Lebus | Bishopric | German:Bistum Lebus Polish:Diecezja lubuska |
1248/1454/1506–1598 | None | Germany Poland |
Established 1124 in Poland, 1248-1372 disputed and 1372 ultimately lost to HRE. 1372–1454fief of the Bohemian crown,seated inFürstenwaldefrom 1385;reichsfreiostensibly from 1248, but challenged byBrandenburg.Continued byHohenzollernLutheran administrators from Protestant Reformation in 1555 until secularization in 1598. | |
Liège | Bishopric | French:Principauté de Liége German:Fürstbistum Lüttich Walloon:Principåté d' Lidje |
980–1789/1795 | Lower Rhenish / Westphalian | Belgium Netherlands |
||
Lübeck | Bishopric | German:Hochstift Lübeck | 1180–1803 | Lower Saxon | Germany | Seated inEutinfrom the 1270s; Reformation started in 1535, continued by Lutheran administrators from 1586 until secularization in 1803.Lübeckbecame a Free Imperial City in 1226. | |
Lyon | Archbishopric | French:Archevêque de Lyon Arpitan:Arch·evèque de Liyon |
1157-1312 | None | France | Seated inLyon;Reichsfreiheitconfirmed byFrederick Barbarossain 1157. Annexed by theKingdom of Francein 1312. | |
Magdeburg | Archbishopric | German:Erzstift Magdeburg | 1180–1680 | Lower Saxon | Germany | Continued byLutheran administratorsbetween 1566 and 1631, and again from 1638 until 1680. | |
Mainz | Archbishopric electorate | German:Erzbistum Mainz, Kurmainz | c. 780–1803 | Electoral Rhenish | Germany | Prince-electorand Arch-Chancellor ofGermany. | |
Merseburg | Bishopric | German:Bistum Merseburg | 1004–1565 | None | Germany | Administered by the LutheranElectorate of Saxonybetween 1544 and 1565. | |
Metz | Bishopric | French:Évêché de Metz German:Hochstift Metz |
10th century–1552 | Upper Rhenish | France | One of theThree Bishopricsceded to France by the 1552Treaty of Chambord. | |
Minden | Bishopric | German:Hochstift Minden | 1180–1648 | Lower Rhenish / Westphalian | Germany | ||
Münster | Bishopric | German:Hochstift Münster | 1180–1802 | Lower Rhenish / Westphalian | Germany | ||
Naumburg | Bishopric | German:Bistum Naumburg-Zeitz | Germany | Under guardianship ofMeissenfrom 1259. Administered bySaxonyfrom 1564. | |||
Olomouc | Bishopric, then archbishopric | Czech:Arcibiskupství olomoucké German:Erzbistum Olmütz Polish:Archidiecezja ołomuniecka |
fief of the Bohemian Crown,after 1742 also of theKingdom of Prussia | None | Czech Republic Poland |
The Czech bishopric (later Metropolitan) ofOlomouc,as afief of the Bohemian Crown,was the peer of theMargraviate of Moravia,and from 1365 its prince-bishop was 'Count of the Bohemian Chapel', i.e., firstcourt chaplain,who was to accompany the monarch on his frequent travels. Secularized in 1803, but the princely title continued. However, all bishops' princely titles were abolished by the pope in 1951. | |
Osnabrück | Bishopric | German:Hochstift Osnabrück | 1225/1236–1802 | Lower Rhenish / Westphalian | Germany | Alternated between Catholic and Protestant incumbents after theThirty Years' War;secularized in 1802/1803 | |
Paderborn | Bishopric | German:Fürstbistum Paderborn | 1281–1802 | Lower Rhenish / Westphalian | Germany | ||
Passau | Bishopric | German:Hochstift Passau | 999–1803 | Bavarian | Austria Germany |
Princely title was confirmed at Nuremberg in 1217. | |
Ratzeburg | Bishopric | German:Bistum Ratzeburg | 1236–1648 | Lower Saxon | Germany | Ruled by Lutheran administrators between 1554 and 1648. | |
Regensburg | Bishopric, then archbishopric electorate | German:Hochstift Regensburg | 1132?–1803 | Bavarian | Germany | Regensburgbecame a Free Imperial City in 1245. | |
Salzburg | Archbishopric electorate | German:Fürsterzbistum Salzburg | 1278–1803 | Bavarian | Austria | Raised to an electorate in 1803, but simultaneously secularized;seeElectorate of Salzburg.Since 1648, the archbishop has also borne the titlePrimas Germaniae,First [Bishop] of Germania, which used to include the right to preside over thePrinces of the Holy Roman Empire.However, all bishops' princely titles were abolished by the pope in 1951. | |
Schwerin | Bishopric | German:Bistum Schwerin | 1180–1648 | Lower Saxon | Germany | Ruled by an administrator between 1516 and 1648. | |
Speyer | Bishopric | German:Hochstift Speyer | 888–1803 | Upper Rhenish | Germany | Territories to the east of the Rhine were annexed by France in 1681, confirmed in 1697. Speyer became a Free Imperial City in 1294. | |
Strasbourg | Bishopric | Alemannic German:Bistum Strossburi French:Évêché de Strasbourg German:Fürstbistum Straßburg |
982–1803 | Upper Rhenish | France Germany |
Territories to the east of the Rhine were annexed by France in 1681, confirmed in 1697. | |
Tarentaise | Archbishopric | French:Prince-évêque de Tarentaise Arpitan:Prince Evèque de Tarentèsa Italian:Principato vescovile di Tarantasia |
1186-1769 | Upper Rhenish | France | Count of Tarentaise from 996;reichsfreifrom 1186.De factodominated by their guardiansSavoy(from 1271). Secularized and annexed by theKingdom of Sardinia1769.[4] | |
Toul | Bishopric | French:Principauté de Toul German:Bistum Tull |
10th century – 1552 | Upper Rhenish | France | One of theThree Bishopricsceded to France by the 1552Treaty of Chambord,confirmed in 1648. | |
Trent | Bishopric | Italian:Principato vescovile di Trento German:Fürstbistum Trient |
1027–1803 | Austrian | Italy | SecularizedtoTyrolin 1803. | |
Trier | Archbishopric electorate | German:Erzbistum Trier, Kurtrier French:Archevêque Trèves |
772–1803 | Electoral Rhenish | Germany | Prince-electorand Arch-Chancellor ofBurgundy. | |
Utrecht | Bishopric | Dutch:Sticht Utrecht | 1024–1528 | Lower Rhenish / Westphalian | Netherlands | Sold toCharles V, Holy Roman Emperorin 1528, after which it was moved to theBurgundian Circle.Founding member of theDutch Republicin 1579/1581, confirmed in 1648. | |
Verden | Bishopric | German:Hochstift Verden | 1180–1648 | Lower Rhenish / Westphalian | Germany | Continued by Lutheran administrators after Reformation until 1645/1648, when it was continued as a secular and independent principality until its disestablishment in 1807. It became a part of theKingdom of Hanoverin 1815. | |
Verdun | Bishopric | French:Principauté de Verdun German:Bistum Wirten |
10th century – 1552 | Upper Rhenish | France | One of theThree Bishopricsceded to France by the 1552Treaty of Chambord,confirmed in 1648. | |
Worms | Bishopric | German:Bistum Worms | 861–1801 | Upper Rhenish | Germany | Wormscity rule established by BishopBurchard(1000–25). Episcopal residence atLadenburgfrom 1400. Held large estates in the formerLahngauregion. Territories on theLeft Bank of the Rhinelost by the 1797Treaty of Campo Formio;secularized at first to theFrench Empire,then toBadenandHesse-Darmstadtin 1815. | |
Würzburg | Bishopric electorate | German:Hochstift Würzburg | 1168–1803 | Franconian | Germany | Duke of Franconia |
The suffragan-bishoprics ofGurk(established 1070),Chiemsee(1216),Seckau(1218), andLavant(1225) sometimes used theFürstbischoftitle, but never held anyreichsfreiterritory. However, all bishops' princely titles were abolished by the pope in 1951.
ThePatriarchate of Aquileia[5](1077–1433) was conquered byVenicein 1420 and officially incorporated after the 1445Council of Florence.
InBresciaBishop Notingus was made count of Brescia in 844.
Thearchbishops of Besançonhad been rulers in the Middle Ages overBesançon,anImperial cityfrom 1307, which in 1512 joined theBurgundian Circle.In theBishopric of Belley,SaintAnthelm of Belleywas grantedReichsfreiheitby EmperorFrederick I,but submitted temporal authorities to theDuchy of Savoyin 1401.
TheBishopric of Sion(French:Principauté épiscopale de Sion,German:Bistum Sitten) was from 999 a classic example of unified secular and diocesan authority. It progressively lost its powers since the Renaissance, and was finally replaced by theRepublic of the Seven Tithingsin 1634.
State of the Teutonic Order
editUpon the incorporation of theLivonian Brothers of the Swordin 1237, the territory of theOrder's Statelargely corresponded with theDiocese of Riga.BishopAlbert of Rigain 1207 had received the lands ofLivoniaas an Imperial fief from the hands of German kingPhilip of Swabia,he however had to come to terms with the Brothers of the Sword. At the behest ofPope Innocent IIItheTerra Marianaconfederation was established, whereby Albert had to cede large parts of the episcopal territory to theLivonian Order.Albert proceeded tactically in the conflict between the Papacy and EmperorFrederick II:in 1225 he reached the acknowledgement of his status as a Prince-Bishop of the Empire, though theRoman Curiainsisted on the fact that the ChristianizedBalticterritories were solely under the suverainty of theHoly See.By the 1234 Bull of Rieti,Pope Gregory IXstated that all lands acquired by the Teutonic Knights were no subject of anyconveyancingby the Emperor.
Within this larger conflict, the continued dualism of the autonomous Riga prince-bishop and theTeutonic Knightsled to a lengthy friction. Around 1245 the Papal legateWilliam of Modenareached a compromise: though incorporated into the Order's State, the archdiocese and its suffragan bishoprics were acknowledged with their autonomous ecclesiastical territories by the Teutonic Knights. The bishops pursued the conferment of the princely title by the Holy Roman Emperor to stress their sovereignty. In the originalPrussianlands of the Teutonic Order, Willam of Modena established the suffragan bishoprics ofCulm,Pomesania,SamlandandWarmia.From the late 13th century onwards, the appointed Warmia bishops were no longer members of the Teutonic Knights, a special status confirmed by the bestowal of the princely title by EmperorCharles IVin 1356.
Arms | Name | Rank | Local name(s) | Territory | Modern nation |
Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Courland | Bishopric | German:Hochstift Kurland Latvian:Kurzemes bīskapija Low German:Bisdom Curland |
Terra Mariana | Latvia | Established about 1234, the smallest of the Livonian dioceses.Secularizedin 1559 and occupied by PrinceMagnus of Denmark.From 1585 under the suzerainty of thePolish–Lithuanian Commonwealth,part of theDuchy of Livonia. | |
Dorpat | Bishopric | Estonian:Tartu piiskopkond German:Hochstift Dorpat Low German:Bisdom Dorpat |
Terra Mariana | Estonia | BishopHermann,appointed by his brother BishopAlbert of Riga,received the title of a prince-bishop by KingHenry VII of Germanyin 1225. Dorpat (Estonian:Tartu) remained asuffragan dioceseofRiga.Dissolved in the course of theProtestant Reformationin 1558. | |
Ösel-Wiek | Bishopric | Estonian:Saare-Lääne piiskopkond German:Bistum Ösel-Wiek Low German:Bisdom Ösel-Wiek |
Terra Mariana | Estonia | Established onSaaremaaisland in 1228 under Bishop Gottfried, appointed by BishopAlbert of Riga,vested with the title of a prince-bishop by KingHenry VII of Germany.It remained asuffragan dioceseofRiga.Dissolved in the course of theProtestant Reformationin 1559. | |
Riga | Archbishopric | German:Erzbistum Riga Latvian:Rīgas arhibīskapija Low German:Erzbisdom Riga |
Terra Mariana | Latvia | Episcopal see atÜxküll1186–1202. In 1225Albert of Rigareceived the title of a Prince-bishop ofLivoniaby EmperorFrederick II.Last ArchbishopWilliam of Brandenburgresigned in 1561 during theLivonian War,territory fell to the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, toSwedenin 1621. | |
Warmia | Bishopric | German:Fürstbistum Ermland Polish:Biskupie Księstwo Warmińskie |
Prussia | Poland (temporal and diocesan territory) Lithuania Russia (diocesan territory only) |
Established by Papal legateWilliam of Modenain 1243, princely title documented in theGolden Bull of 1356.Incorporated into theJagiellon kingdom of Polandin 1466 and re-established as an autonomous prince-bishopric under thePolish crownin 1479 (see below). |
Kingdom of Poland and Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
editThree bishoprics were initially parts of the Kingdom of Poland and its offshoots before being subsequently incorporated into the Holy Roman Empire, namely the bishoprics ofWolin/Kamień (Wollin/Cammin)(1140-1181),Lubusz (Lebus)(1125-1372) andWrocław (Breslau)(1201-1335/1348), with the latter two of them continuing, however, as suffragan to the Polisharchbishopric of Gnieznofor many years later (until 1424 in the case of Lebus and until 1821 in the case of Breslau). On the other hand, the Prince Bishopric of Warmia was obtained byPolandfollowing theSecond Peace of Thorn.
Arms | Name | Rank | Local name(s)] | Years under Polish crown or offshoots | Modern nation |
Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wolin/Kamień | Bishopric | Polish:Biskupie Księstwo Kamieńskie German:Hochstift Cammin |
1140-1181 | Poland (temporal and diocesan territory) Germany (diocesan territory only) |
Established 1140 in the Polish Duchy of Pomerania. Since 1181 part of HRE.Reichsfreiheitobtained 1248 from and lost 1544 again toDuchy of Pomerania.Secularized in 1650, to BrandenburgProvince of Pomerania | |
Kraków(Duchy of Siewierz) | Bishopric | Polish:Księstwo Siewierskie | 1443-1791 | Poland | Wenceslaus I, Duke of Cieszyn,sold aDuchy of Siewierzto theBishop of KrakówZbigniew Cardinal Oleśnickifor 6,000 silverGroschenin 1443. This tiny duchy had its own laws, treasury and army. In 1790, theGreat Sejmtook over the Duchy of Siewierz to the State Treasury and incorporated it directly into thePolish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. | |
Lebus | Bishopric | Polish:Diecezja lubuska German:Bistum Lebus |
1124-1248/1372 | Germany Poland |
Established 1124 in Poland, 1248-1372 disputed and 1372 ultimately lost to HRE. 1372-1454fief of the Bohemian crown,seated inFürstenwaldesince 1385;Reichsfreiheitostensibly since 1248, but challenged byBrandenburg.Continued byHohenzollernLutheran administrators after Protestant Reformation in 1555 until secularization in 1598. | |
Warmia | Bishopric | Polish:Biskupie Księstwo Warmińskie German:Fürstbistum Ermland |
1466-1772 | Poland (temporal and diocesan territory) Lithuania Russia (diocesan territory only) |
Established as a part of the State of the Teutonic Order (see above) by Papal legateWilliam of Modenain 1243, with princely title documented in theGolden Bull of 1356.Incorporated into theJagiellon kingdom of Polandin 1466 and re-established as an autonomous prince-bishopric under thePolish crownin 1479. It was ultimately abolished in the course of thePrussianannexation in 1772 during theFirst Partition of Poland. | |
Wrocław(Duchy of Nysa) | Bishopric | Polish:Księstwo Nyskie German:Fürstentum/Herzogtum Neisse Czech:Niské knížectví |
1201-1335/1348 | Poland Czech Republic (temporal and diocesan territory) Germany (diocesan territory only) |
Ceded 1335/1348 to Lands of the Bohemian Crown (part of HRE). After dissolution of the HRE, secularized in 1810 (Prussian part) and in 1850 (Austrian part), but the princely title continued until 1951, elevated to archbishopric 1930 |
England
editDurham
editThebishops of Durham,while not sovereign, held extensive rights usually reserved to the English, and later British, monarch within the county palatine of Durham. In 1075Walcher,the bishop of Durham, was allowed to purchase the earldom of Northumbria; this marked the beginning of the bishops' temporal powers, which expanded during the Middle Ages before being gradually curbed from the sixteenth century onwards.[6]Except for a brief period of suppression during theEnglish Civil War,the bishopric retained some temporal powers until it was abolished by theDurham (County Palatine) Act 1836,when its powers returned to the Crown.[7][8]The last institution of the palatinate, itscourt of chancery,was abolished in 1974.[9]
Other English Prince-bishoprics
edit- TheIsle of Elywas aroyal liberty,and between 1109 and 1535 a county palatine, with traces of the bishop's princely status remaining until 1837.[10]
- Hexhamshirewas a county palatine under theArchbishop of Yorkfrom at least the 14th century until 1572; prior to that, it was a royal liberty.
France
editFrom the tenth century civil wars on, many bishops took over the powers of the local count, as authorised by the king. For example, at Chalons-sur-Marne the bishop ruled the lands 20 km around the town, while the Archbishop of Rheims demarcated his territory with five fortresses of Courville, Cormicy, Betheneville, Sept-Saulx and Chaumuzy.[11] A number of French bishops did hold a noble title, with a tiny territory usually about their seat; it was often aprincelytitle, especially Count but also Prince or Baron, including actual seigneurial authority and rights.[12]Indeed, six of the twelve originalPairies(the royal vassals awarded with the highest precedence at Court) were episcopal: theArchbishop of Reims,theBishop of Langres,and theBishop of Laonheld aducaltitle, the bishops ofBeauvais,Chalôns,andNoyonhadcomitalstatus. They were later joined by theArchbishop of Paris,who was awarded a ducal title, but with precedence over the others.[12][13]
France also counted a number of prince-bishops formerly within the Holy Roman Empire such those of Besançon, Cambrai, Strasbourg, Metz, Toul, Verdun, and Belley. The bishops of Arles, Embrun, and Grenoble also qualify as princes of episcopal cities. The bishop of Viviers was Count of Viviers and Prince de Donzère. The bishop of Sisteron was also Prince de Lurs, the title of count was held by the Archbishop of Lyons, and the bishops of Gap, Saint-Paul-Trois-Châteaux, Vienne and Die were Seigneurs of their cities.
Never part of the empire were Lisieux, Cahors, Chalon-sur-Saône, Léon, Dol and Vabres whose bishops were also counts. Ajaccio was Count of Frasso. The bishops of Sarlat, Saint-Malo (Baron de Beignon) and of Luçon were Barons and Tulle was Viscount of the city. The bishop of Mende was governor and count, Puy held the title Count of Velay, Quimper was Seigneur of the city and Comte de Cornouailles, Valence was Seigneur and Count of the city. Montpellier's bishop was Count of Mauguio and Montferrand, Marquis of Marquerose and Baron of Sauve, Durfort, Salevoise, and Brissac. The bishop of Saint-Claude was Seigneur of all the lands of Saint-Claude. The bishops of Digne (Seigneur and Baron), Pamiers (co-Seigneur), Albi, Lectoure, Saint-Brieuc, Saint-Papoul, Saint-Pons, and Uzès were Seigneurs of the cities.[13][14][15][12]
Portugal
editFrom 1472 to 1967, the bishop ofCoimbraheld thecomitaltitle of Count ofArganil,being thus called "bishop-count" (Portuguese:Bispo-Conde). The use of thecomitaltitle declined during the 20th century sincePortugalhas become a republic and nobility privileges have ceased to be officially recognized, and was ultimately discontinued.
Montenegro
editThebishops of Cetinje,who took as thePrince-Bishops of Montenegrothe place of the earlier secular (Grand)Voivodesin 1516, had a unique position ofSlavonic,Orthodoxprince-bishops ofMontenegrounderOttomansuzerainty.[16]It was eventually secularized and became ruled by hereditary princes and ultimatelyKings of Montenegroin 1852, as reflected in their styles:
- firstVladika i upravitelj Crne Gore i Brda( "Bishop and Ruler of Montenegro and the Highlands" )
- from 13 March 1852 (New Style):Po milosti Božjoj knjaz i gospodar Crne Gore i Brda( "By the grace of GodPrince and Sovereign of Montenegro and the Highlands ")
- from 28 August 1910 (New Style):Po milosti Božjoj kralj i gospodar Crne Gore( "By the grace of God, King and Sovereign of Montenegro" )
Contemporary
editTheBishop of Urgell,Catalonia, who no longer has any secular rights in Spain, remainsex officioone of twoco-princes of Andorra,along with the French head of state (currently itsPresident)[1][2]
Modern informal usage
editThe term has been used by Episcopalians in North America to describe modern bishops with commanding personalities usually of previous generations.[17]One such individual was BishopHorace W. B. Doneganof whom Episcopalsuffragan bishopRobert E. Terwilligersaid "We often say that Bishop Donegan is the last prince bishop of the church because in his graciousness, in his presence, in his total lack of any crisis of identity, we have seen what a bishop is; and we know that it is a kind of royalty in Christ."[18]
Anglican ArchbishopRobert Duncanexpressed his view that the pastoral changes "in the 1970s was a revolution in reaction to those prince bishops – they had all this authority, they had all this power." So systems such as the Commission on Ministry system in the Episcopal Church "was to replace an individual's authority with a committee's authority."[17]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^abc"The constitution of the Principality of Andorra".
- ^abc"Why is the President of France Co-Prince of Andorra?".Royal Central. 7 October 2019.Retrieved9 November2019.
The President of France, Emmanuel Macron, serves as Co-Prince of Andorra in addition to his duties as French President and is one of the few examples of a democratically elected leader serving in a royal capacity in another country. Since 2003, the other Co-Prince is the Catholic Bishop of Urgell from Spain, Joan-Enric Vives i Sicília. But how did the president and bishop become co-princes of another country? The answer lies in a political arrangement stretching back over seven centuries.
- ^Joachim Fernau: 'Deutschland, Deutschland über alles — Geschichte der Deutschen'
- ^Borrel, E.L. (1889). "Origine composition territoriale & Démembrements Successifs des Fiefs de l'évéché de Tarentaise".Recueil des mémoires et documents de l'Académie de la Val d'I sắc re.5:254–262.
- ^Latin:Patriarchæ Aquileiensis,Italian:Patriarcato di Aquileia,Friulian:Patriarcjât di Aquilee,Venetian:Patriarcal de Aquileja
- ^Dugdale, Thomas; Burnett., William (1830).England & Wales Delineated (Curiosities of Great Britain).p. 689.
- ^"Durham".Encyclopædia Britannica. 11th Ed. Vol 8.
- ^The Statutes of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland.His Majesty's Statute and Law Printers. 1836. p. 130.
- ^"Courts Act 1971, c. 4".legislation.gov.uk.Retrieved8 June2023.
- ^Pugh, Ralph Bernard,ed. (2002) [1953].A History of the County of Cambridge and the Isle of Ely: Volume 4.London: Victoria County Historiy / British History Online. pp. 4–8.Retrieved14 April2022.
- ^Rosamond McKitterick, Paul Fouracre, David Luscombe, Timothy Reuter, David Abulafia, Jonathan Riley-Smith, C. T. Allmand, Michael Jones (1995).The New Cambridge Medieval History: Volume 4, C.1024-c.1198, Part 2.Cambridge University Press. pp. 531–532.ISBN0521414113.
{{cite book}}
:CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^abcNorman Ravitch (2019).Sword and Mitre Government and Episcopate in France and England in the Age of Aristocracy.de Gruyter. pp. 54–56.ISBN9783111359540.
- ^abEdmond Biré (1895).Histoire et littérature(3 ed.). E. Vitte. pp. 52–53.
- ^Augustin Sicard (1893).L'ancien clergé de France: Les évêques avant la Révolution Volume 1 of L'ancien clergé de France.pp. 44–45.
- ^Le correspondant, Volume 155.Bureaux du Correspondant. 1889. pp. 210–211.
- ^Sima Milutinović Sarajlija:MONTENEGRO led by its BishopsfromИсторија Црне Горе(The History of Montenegro,1835)(in Serbian)
- ^ab"Duncan's Final Interview as Archbishop".AnglicanTV Ministries. June 19, 2014.Archivedfrom the original on 2021-12-11.
- ^Robert E. Terwilliger (1973)."The Apostolic Ministry".
Sources and external links
edit- Catholic Encyclopaediapassim
- The Prince-Bishop of Münster
- Albert of Buxhoeveden, Prince-Bishop of Livonia
- Heraldica.org - here French peerage
- Westermann,Großer Atlas zur Weltgeschichte(in German)
- WorldStatesmensearch under each present country