Squidwas a BritishWorld War IIship-mountedanti-submarineweapon.It consisted of a three-barrelledmortarwhich launcheddepth charges.It replaced theHedgehogsystem, and was in turn replaced by theLimbosystem.
Squid | |
---|---|
Type | Anti-submarine Mortar |
Place of origin | United Kingdom |
Service history | |
In service | 1943–1977 |
Used by | Royal Navy,Swedish Navy,Royal Canadian Navy |
Production history | |
Designer | Directorate of Miscellaneous Weapons Development |
Designed | 1942 |
Specifications | |
Mass | 10 tons |
Shell | 440 lb (200 kg) |
Calibre | 12 in (305 mm) |
Barrels | Three |
Effective firing range | 275 yards (250 m) |
Filling | Minol |
Filling weight | 207 lb (94 kg) |
Detonation mechanism | Time fuse |
Development
editOrdered directly from the drawing board in 1942, under the auspices of theDirectorate of Miscellaneous Weapons Development,this weapon was rushed into service in May 1943 on boardHMSAmbuscade.The first production unit was installed onHMSHadleigh Castle;it went on to be installed on 70 frigates and corvettes during theSecond World War.The first successful use was byHMSLoch Killinon 31 July 1944, when she sankU-333.The system was credited with sinking 17 submarines in 50 attacks over the course of the war - a success ratio of 2.9 to 1. In contrast, out of 5,174 Britishdepth chargeattacks in WWII there were 85.5 kills, a ratio of 60.5 to 1. TheHedgehogmade 268 attacks for 47 kills, a ratio of 5.7 to 1.[1]By 1959, 195 Squid installations had been produced.
This weapon was a three-barrel 12-inch (305 mm) mortar with the mortars mounted in series but off-bore from each other in order to scatter the projectiles. The barrels were mounted in a frame that could be rotated through 90 degrees for loading. The projectiles weighed 390 pounds (177 kg) with a 207-pound (94 kg)minolcharge.[Note 1]On some vessels, the Squid installations were at the stern – the bombs were fired over the length of the ship and dropped into the sea slightly ahead of it.[2]Sink rate was 43.5 ft/s (13.3 m/s) and a clockwork timefuzewas used to determine the detonation depth. All three projectiles had to be set to the same depth; this could be continuously updated right up to the moment of launch to take into account the movements of the target.[2]The maximum depth was 900 feet (270 m).
The weapons were automatically fired from thesonarrange recorder at the proper moment. The pattern formed a triangle about 40 yards (37 m) on a side at a distance of 275 yards (251 m) ahead of the ship. Most Squid installations utilised two sets of mortars. All six bombs were fired in salvo so they formed opposing triangular spreads. The salvos were set to explode 25 feet (7.6 m) above and below the target, the resulting pressure wave crushing the hull of the submarine. Post-war trials found Squid was nine times more effective than conventional depth charges.[3]
Use
editDespite its proven effectiveness, some officers, notablyCaptainKenneth Adams,RCN,opposed fitting Squid to escorts because it meant sacrificing guns, which would make ships unsuitable for fleet actions.[4]
In April 1977, theType 61 frigateSalisburybecame the last ship to fire Squid in Royal Navy service. Examples of the mortars are on display at theExplosion! Museum of Naval Firepowerin Gosport, Hampshire and another at Devonport Naval Base. The system is fitted toHMSCavalier(D73),which is part of the historic ships collection in the Historic Dockyard in Chatham, Kent. It can also be seen onHMCSHaida,which is on display inHamilton, Ontarioand at the naval museum inMalacca,Malaysia.
In Swedish service the system soldiered on until 1982 when theÖstergötland-class destroyerswere decommissioned.
Gallery
editNotes
edit- ^Due to shortages ofTNTandRDX(cyclonite) in World War II, the British used a 50/50 mixture ofammonium nitrateand TNT (amatol) innaval minesand depth charges. This low-grade explosive was later improved by the addition of about 20%aluminiumpowder, producingminol.
References
editCitations
edit- ^"Britain ASW Weapons".navweaps.Retrieved28 May2015.
- ^ab"Squid Mortar".Friends of HMCS Haida. Archived fromthe originalon 17 February 2012.Retrieved21 March2012.
- ^Zimmerman, David (1989).Great Naval Battle of Ottawa.Toronto: University of Toronto Press. p. 127.ISBN0802026877.
- ^Zimmerman (1989),pp. 128–129.
Bibliography
edit- Jane's Naval Weapon SystemsIssue 33, E R Hooton,ISBN0-7106-0893-4
- Naval Armament,Doug Richardson, 1981, Jane's Publishing,ISBN0-531-03738-X