Wikipedia

Sri Vaishnavism

Sri Vaishnavism(Sanskrit:श्रीवैष्णवसम्प्रदाय,romanized:Śrīvaiṣṇavasampradāya) is a denomination within theVaishnavismtradition ofHinduism,[4]predominantly practiced inSouth India.The name refers to goddessLakshmi(also known as Sri), as well as a prefix that means "sacred, revered", and the godVishnu,who are together revered in this tradition.[5][6]

Sri Vaishnavism
TheRanganathaswamy TempleofSrirangamis the largest Hindu temple in India.[1]
Regions with significant populations
India,Nepal
Religions
Vaishnavism(Hinduism)
Scriptures
Vedas,Upanishads,Bhagavad Gita,Brahma Sutra,Pancharatra,Prabandham[2][3]
Languages
Tamil,Sanskrit

The tradition traces its roots to the ancientVedasandPancharatratexts, popularised by theAlvarsand their canon, theNaalayira Divya Prabandham.[7][8][9]The founding of Sri Vaishnavism is traditionally attributed toNathamuniof the 10th century CE;[10]its central philosopher has beenRamanujaof the 11th century, who developed theVishishtadvaita( "qualified non-dualism" )Vedantasub-school ofHindu philosophy.[11][12]The tradition split into two denominations around the 16th century. TheVadakalaiwho follow the doctrine ofVedanta Desika,whereas theTenkalaiwho follow the principles ofManavala Mamunigal.[13][14]TheTelugu Brahminsof the Sri Vaishnava tradition form a single distinct sect called theAndhra Vaishnavas,and are not divided into the Vadakalai and Tenkalai denominations, unlike the TamilIyengars.[15]

The most striking difference between Sri Vaishnavas and other Vaishnava groups lies in their interpretation of the Vedas. While other Vaishnava groups interpretVedic deitieslikeIndra,Savitar,Bhaga,Rudra,etc., to be the same as theirPuraniccounterparts, Sri Vaishnavas consider these to be different names/roles/forms ofNarayana,thus claiming that the entirety of the Vedas is dedicated toVishnureverence alone. Sri Vaishnavas have remodelled thePancharatrahomas(rituals) to include Vedicsuktas(hymns) in them, thus integrating them with a Vedic perspective.[citation needed]

Etymology

edit

The name Sri Vaishnavism (IAST:Śrīvaiṣṇavism) is derived from two words,SriandVaishnavism.InSanskrit,the wordSrirefers to goddess Lakshmi as well as a prefix that means "sacred, revered", and godVishnuwho are together revered in this tradition.[4][6]The word Vaishnavism refers to a tradition that reveres god Vishnu as the supreme god.[16]The followers of Sri Vaishnavism are known as the Sri Vaishnava(s) (IAST: Śrīvaiṣṇava, श्रीवैष्णव).[17]

History

edit
See also:Vaishnavism in Ancient Tamilakam

Theological origins

edit

The tradition traces its roots to the primordial start of the world through Vishnu, and to the texts of Vedic era with both Sri and Vishnu found in ancient texts of the 1st millennium BCE particularly to thePuranas,Upanishads,and theBhagavad Gita.[8][14]

Historical origins

edit

The historical basis of Sri Vaishnavism is in the syncretism of two developments. The first is Sanskrit traditions found in ancient texts such as the Vedas and theAgama(Pancaratra), and the second is the Tamil traditions found in early medieval texts (Tamil Prabandham)[18]and practices such as the emotional songs and music ofAlvarsthat expressed spiritual ideas, ethics and loving devotion to god Vishnu.[19][8][9]The Sanskrit traditions likely represent the ideas shared in ancient times, from theGanges riverplains of the northern Indian subcontinent, while the Tamil traditions likely have roots in theKaveri riverplains of southern India, particularly what in modern times are the coastalAndhra Pradesh,KarnatakaandTamil Naduregion.[20]

The tradition was founded byNathamuni(10th century), who combined the two traditions, by drawing on Sanskrit philosophical tradition and combining it with the aesthetic and emotional appeal of theBhakti movementpioneers called theAlvars.[10]Sri Vaishnavism developed in Tamil Nadu in the 10th century, after Nathamuni returned from a pilgrimage toVrindavanin north India (modernUttar Pradesh).[19]

Nathamuni's ideas were continued byYamunacharya,who maintained that the Vedas and Pancaratras are equal, devotional rituals and bhakti are important practices.[10]The legacy of Yamunacharya was continued byRamanuja(1017-1137),[21]but they never met.[22]Legend goes that Ramanuja saw Yamunacharya's corpse, which had three fingers curled. Ramanuja was told that they represented the three wishes that Yamunacharya had revealed before he passed. One of the wishes was that Ramanuja should write a commentary on the Brahma Sutras.[23]Ramanuja, a scholar who studied in anAdvaita Vedantamonastery and disagreed with some of the ideas of Advaita, became the most influential leader of Sri Vaishnavism.[24][25]He developed theVisistadvaita( "qualified non-dualism" ) philosophy.[10]

Around 14th century,Ramanandi Sampradayasplit from it.[26][27]Around the 18th century, the Sri Vaishnava tradition split into theVadakalai( "northern culture", Vedic) andTenkalai( "southern culture", Bhakti).[13][14]TheVadakalaiplaced more emphasis on the Sanskrit traditions, while theTenkalairelied more on the Tamil traditions.[28]Although this difference is very superficial and basically non-existent in practical reality. This theological dispute between the Vedic and Bhakti traditions traces it roots to the debate betweenSrirangamandKanchipurammonasteries between the 13th and 15th century.[13]The debate then was on the nature of salvation and the role of grace. The Bhakti-favouring Tenkalai tradition asserted, states Patricia Mumme, that Vishnu saves the soul like "a mother cat carries her kitten", where the kitten just accepts the mother while she picks her up and carries.[13]In contrast the Vedic-favouring Vadakalai tradition asserted that Vishnu saves the soul like "a mother monkey carries her baby", where the baby has to make an effort and hold on while the mother carries.[13]This metaphorical description of the disagreement between the two sub-traditions, first appears in the 18th-century Tamil texts, but historically refers to the foundational ideas behind thekarma-marga versusbhakti-marga traditions of Hinduism.[29]

Reverence for Vishnu and Lakshmi

edit

Along with Vishnu, and likeShaivism,the ultimate reality and truth is considered in Sri Vaishnavism to be the divine sharing of the feminine and the masculine, the goddess and the god.[30]Sri (Lakshmi) is regarded as the preceptor of the Sri Vaishnava sampradaya. Goddess Sri has been considered inseparable from godVishnu,and essential to each other, and to the act of mutual loving devotion. Sri and Vishnu act and cooperate in the creation of everything that exists, and redemption.[30]According to some medieval scholars of Sri Vaishnava theology, states John Carman, Sri and Vishnu do so using "divine knowledge that is unsurpassed" and through "love that is an erotic union".[30]But Sri Vaishnavism differs from Shaivism, in that Vishnu is ultimately the sole creator, preserver and destroyer of the universe while Sri Lakshmi is the medium for salvation, the kind mother who recommends to Vishnu and thereby helps living beings in their desire for redemption and salvation.[30]In contrast, in Shaivism, the goddess (Shakti) is the energy and power of Shiva and she is the equal with different roles, supreme in the role of creator and destroyer.[31]

The prefixSriis used for this sect because they give special importance to the worship of the Goddess Lakshmi, the consort of Vishnu, who they believe to act as a mediator between God Vishnu and man.[30][32]

Philosophy

edit

Vishishtadvaita

edit
Main article:Vishishtadvaita

Sri Vaishnavism's philosophical foundation was established by Ramanuja, who started his Vedic studies withYadava Prakaasain an Advaita Vedanta monastery.[24]He brought Upanishadic ideas to this tradition, and wrote texts on qualifiedmonism,calledVishishtadvaitain the Hindu tradition.[33][34]His ideas are one of three subschools inVedanta,the other two are known asAdi Shankara's Advaita (absolute monism) andMadhvacharya'sDvaita(dualism).[33]

Ramanuja's Vishishtadvaita asserts thatAtman(souls) andBrahman[note 1]are different, a difference that is never transcended.[35][36]God Vishnu alone is independent, all other gods and beings are dependent on him.[37]However, in contrast to Dvaita Vedanta philosophy of Madhvacharya, Ramanuja asserts "qualified non-dualism",[38]that souls share the same essential nature of Brahman,[38]and that there is a universal sameness in the quality and degree of bliss possible for human souls, and every soul can reach the bliss state of God himself.[35][39]While the 13th- to 14th-century Madhvacharya asserted both "qualitative and quantitative pluralism of souls", Ramanuja asserted "qualitative monism and quantitative pluralism of souls", states Sharma.[40]The other philosophical difference between Madhvacharya's Vaishnavism Sampradaya and Ramanuja's Vaishnavism Sampradaya,[note 2]has been on the idea of eternal damnation; Madhvacharya believed that some souls are eternally doomed and damned, while Ramanuja disagreed and accepted the Advaita Vedanta view that everyone can, with effort, achieve inner liberation and spiritual freedom (moksha).[42][43]

Theology

Śrīvaiṣṇava theologians state that the poems of
theAlvarscontain the essential meaning of
the SanskritVedas.

— John Carman and Vasudha Narayanan[44]

According to Sri Vaishnavism theology,mokshacan be reached by devotion and service to the Lord and detachment from the world. Whenmokshais reached, the cycle of reincarnation is broken and the soul is united with Vishnu, though maintaining their distinctions, inVaikuntha,Vishnu's heaven.[45]Moksha can also be reached by total surrender (saranagati), an act of grace by the Lord.[46]

God, according to Ramanuja's Sri Vaishnavism philosophy, has both soul and body; all of life and the world of matter is the glory of God's body.[25]The path to Brahman (Vishnu), asserted Ramanuja, is devotion to godliness and constant remembrance of the beauty and love of personal god (sagunaBrahman, Vishnu).[25][34][47]Ramanuja's theory posits both Brahman and the world of matter are two different absolutes, both metaphysically real, neither one false or illusive, andsagunaBrahman with attributes is also real.[34]

Comparisons with Advaita Vedanta

edit

Ramanuja accepted that theVedasare a reliable source of knowledge, then critiqued other schools of Hindu philosophy, includingAdvaita Vedanta,as having failed in interpreting all of the Vedic texts.[48]He asserted, in hisSri Bhashya,thatpurvapaksin(previous schools) selectively interpret thoseUpanishadicpassages that support their monistic interpretation, and ignore those passages that support the pluralism interpretation.[48]There is no reason, stated Ramanuja, to prefer one part of a scripture and not other, the whole of the scripture must be considered on par.[48][49]One cannot, according to Ramanuja, attempt to give interpretations of isolated portions of any scripture. Rather, the scripture must be considered one integrated corpus, expressing a consistent doctrine.[48]The Vedic literature, asserted Ramanuja, mention both plurality and oneness, therefore the truth must incorporate pluralism and monism, or qualified monism.[48]

This method of scripture interpretation distinguishes Ramanuja from Adi Shankara.[49]Shankara's exegetical approachSamanvayat Tatparya LingawithAnvaya-Vyatireka,[50]states that for proper understanding all texts must be examined in their entirety and then their intent established by six characteristics, which includes studying what is stated by the author to be his goal, what he repeats in his explanation, then what he states as conclusion and whether it can beepistemicallyverified.[51][52]Not everything in any text, states Shankara, has equal weight and some ideas are the essence of any expert's textual testimony.[49]This philosophical difference in scriptural studies, helped Shankara conclude that thePrincipal Upanishadsprimarily teach monism with teachings such asTat tvam asi,while helping Ramanuja conclude that qualified monism is at the foundation of Hindu spirituality.[48][53][54]

Comparisons with Protestant Christianity and Buddhism

edit

John Carman, a professor at theHarvard Divinity School,states that some of the similarities insalvationideas in Sri Vaishnavism and Protestant Christian doctrines of divine grace are striking.[55]Both accept God as a personal concept, accept devotee's ability to relate to this God without human intermediaries, and accept the idea ofsola gratia– salvation through faith by the grace of God alone, such as those found inMartin Luther's teachings.[55]While both Sri Vaishnavism andProtestant Christianityaccept a supreme God and shares ideas on the nature of salvation, they differ in their specifics aboutincarnationsuch asJesus Christbeing the only incarnation in Christianity, while Sri Vaishnavism accepts many incarnations (avatar) of Vishnu.[56]Christian missionaries in 19th century colonial British India, noted the many similarities and attempted to express the theology of Christianity as abhakti margato Hindus, along the lines of Sri Vaishnavism, in their mission to convert them from Hinduism to Christianity.[57]

Similar teachings on the nature of salvation through grace and compassion, adds Carman, are found in the Japanese scholar Shinran's text on Jodo Shinshu sect of Buddhism, even though non-theisticBuddhismand theistic Sri Vaishnavism do differ in their views on God.[55]

Texts and scholarship

edit
Main article:Vishishtadvaita

Sri Vaishnavism philosophy is primarily based on interpretingVedanta,particularly theUpanishads,theBhagavad Gita,theBrahma Sutrasand the Narayaniya section of theMahabharata.[8][58]The Vaishnava Agama texts, also called the Pancaratra, has been an important part of Sri Vaishnava tradition.[10][59]Another theological textual foundation of the tradition are the Tamilbhaktisongs of the Alvars (7th to 10th century).[12]The syncretic fusion of the two textual traditions is sometimes referred to as theUbhaya Vedanta,or dual Vedanta.[12]The relative emphasis between the two has been a historic debate within the Sri Vaishnavism tradition,[2]which ultimately led to the schism into the Vatakalai and Tenkalai sub-traditions around the 18th century.[13][14]

Nathamuni

edit
Main article:Nathamuni

Nathamuni collected the poems ofNammalvar,in the form ofDivya Prabandham,likely in the 9th century CE,[60]or the 10th century.[10]One of his lasting contributions was to apply the Vedic theory of music on all the Alvar songs usingSanskrit prosody,calling the resulting choreography as divine music, and teaching his nephews the art of resonant bhakti singing of the Alvar songs.[60]This precedence set theguru-sisya-parampara(teacher-student-tradition) in Sri Vaishnavism.[61]This style of education from one generation to the next, is a tradition calledAraiyars,states Guy Beck, which preserved "the art of singing and dancing the verses of the Divya Prabandham" set in thesacred melodies and rhythmsdescribed in the Vedic texts.[61]

Nathamuni's efforts to syncretically combine the Vedic knowledge and Alvar compositions, also set the precedence of reverence for both the Vedas and the Alvar bhakti ideas. Nathamuni's scholarship that set Alvar songs in Vedic meter set a historic momentum, and the liturgical and meditational songs continue to be sung in the modern era temples of Sri Vaishnavism, which is part of the service calledcevai(Sanskrit:Seva).[60][62]

Nathamuni is also attributed with three texts, all in Sanskrit.[60]These areNyaya Tattva,Purusha NirnayaandYogarahasya.[63]TheYogarahasyatext, states Govindacharya, is a meditational text, includes the eight limbyogasimilar to that of Patanjali, but emphasizes yoga as "the art of communion with God".[63]TheNyaya Tattvatext survives only in quotes and references cited in other texts, and these suggest that it presented epistemic foundations (Nyaya) including the philosophical basis for the Hindu belief on the existence of "soul" (Atman), in contrast to Indian philosophies such as Buddhism that denied the existence of soul.[64][65]Nathamuni, for example asserts,

If "I" did not refer to the true self, there would be no interiority belonging to the soul. The interior is distinguished from the exterior by the concept "I". The aspiration, "May I, having abandoned all suffering, participate freely in infinite bliss", actuates a person whose goal is liberation to study scriptures etc. Were it thought that liberation involved the destruction of the individual, he would run away as soon as the subject of liberation was suggested... The "I", the knowing subject, is the inner self.
—Nyayatattva,Nathamuni, ~9th-10th century, Translator: Christopher Bartley[65]

Yamunacharya

edit
Main article:Yamunacharya

Yamunacharya was the grandson ofNathamuni,also known in Sri Vaishnava tradition as Alavandar, whose scholarship is remembered for correlating Alvar bhakti theology and Pancaratra Agama texts to Vedic ideas.[66]He was theacharya(chief teacher) of Sri Vaishnavism monastery at Srirangam, and was followed byRamanuja,even though they never met.[22]Yamunacharya composed a number of works important in Sri Vaishnavism, particularlySiddhitrayam(about the nature of Atman, God, universe),Gitarthasangraha(analysis of theBhagavad Gita), Agamapramanya (epistemological basis of Agamas, mapping them to the Vedas),Maha Purushanirnayam(extension of Nathamuni's treatise),StotraratnamandChathuh shloki(bhaktistrotatexts).[66]

Yamunacharya is also credited withNitya GranthaandMayavada Khandana.TheNitya Granthais a ritual text and suggests methods of daily worship ofNarayana(Vishnu).[67]The 10th centuryMayavada Khandanatext, together withSiddhitrayamof Yamunacharya predominantly critiques the philosophy of the traditionally dominant school ofAdvaita VedantainHindu philosophy,but also critiques non-Vedic traditions.[68]

Ramanuja

edit
Main article:Ramanuja

The Sri Vaishnava tradition attributes nine Sanskrit texts to Ramanuja[69]–Vedarthasamgraha(literally, "Summary of the Vedas meaning"[note 3])Sri Bhasya(a review and commentary on theBrahma Sutras),Bhagavad Gita Bhashya(a review and commentary on theBhagavad Gita), and the minor works titledVedantadipa,Vedantasara,Gadya Traya(which is a compilation of three texts called theSharanagati Gadyam,Sriranga Gadyamand theVaikuntha Gadyam), andNitya Grantham.

Some modern scholars have questioned the authenticity of all but the three of the largest works credited to Ramanuja; the following texts are considered as authentically traceable to Ramanuja –ShriBhashya,Vedarthasamgraha,and theBhagavad Gita Bhashya.[69][71]

Ramanuja's scholarship is predominantly founded on Vedanta, Upanishads in particular.[70][72]He never claims that his ideas were original, but his method of synthesis that combined the Vedic ideas with popular spirituality, states Anne Overzee, is original.[72]Ramanuja, wrote his biographer Ramakrishnananda, was "the culmination of the movement started from the Vedas, nourished by the Alvars, Nathamuni and Yamuncharya".[72]

Ramunaja himself credits the theories he presents, inVedarthasamgraha,to the ideas of ancient Hindu scholars such as "Bodhyana, Tanka (Brahmanandin), Dramida (Dravidacarya), Guhadeva, Kapardin and Bharuci".[72][73][note 4]The 11th-century scholarship of Ramanuja emphasized the concept ofSarira-Saririn,that is the world of matter and the empirical reality of living beings is the "body ofBrahman",[note 5]everything observed is God, one lives in this body of God, and the purpose of this body and all of creation is to empower soul in its journey to liberating salvation.[75][76]

Post Ramanuja period authors

edit
Main articles:Pillai Lokacharya,Manavala Mamunigal,andVedanta Desika

AfterRamanujaseveral authors composed important theological and exegetical works on Sri Vaishnavism. Such authors includeParsara Bhattar,Nadadoor Ammal, Sudarshan Suri,Pillai Lokacharya,Vedanta Desika,Manavala Mamunigal,Periyavachan Pillai and Rangaramanuja Muni.[77][78][79][80]

Organisation

edit

The Sri Vaishnavism tradition has nurtured an institutional organization ofmathas(monasteries) since its earliest days, particularly from the time of Ramanuja. After the death of Yamunacharya, Ramanuja was nominated as the leader of the Srirangam matha, though Yamunacharya and Ramanuja never met.[22]Amongst other things, Ramanuja is remembered in the Sri Vaishnavism tradition for his organizational skills and the lasting institutional reforms he introduced at Srirangam, a system paralleling those at Advaita monasteries of his time and where he studied before joining Srirangam matha. Ramanuja travelled and founded many Sri Vaishnavismmathasacross India, such as the one inMelukote.[81][82]The Sri Vaishnavism tradition believes that Ramanuja started 700 mathas, but historical evidence suggests several of these were started later.[83]

Left: The Parakala monastery of Sri Vaishnavism
Right: A Srirangam temple tower constructed by Ahobila Mutt monastery.[84]

Thematha,or a monastery, hosted numerous students, many teachers and an institutionalized structure to help sustain and maintain its daily operations. Amathain Vaishnvaism and other Hindu traditions, like a college, designates teaching, administrative and community interaction functions, with prefix or suffix to names, with titles such asGuru,Acharya,Swami,andJiyar.[85]

AGuruis someone who is a "teacher, guide or master" of certain knowledge.[86]Traditionally a reverential figure to the student in Hinduism, theguruserves as a "counselor, who helps mold values, shares experiential knowledge as much as literal knowledge, an exemplar in life, an inspirational source and who helps in the spiritual evolution of a student."[87]

AnAcharyarefers to either a Guru of high rank, or more often to the leader of a regional monastery.[88][89]This position typically involves a ceremonial initiation calleddikshaby the monastery, where the earlier leader anoints the successor asAcharya.[88][90]ASwamiis usually those who interact with community on the behalf of thematha.The chief and most revered of all Vaishnava monasteries, are titled asJeer,Jiyar,Jeeyar,orCiyar.[83]

The Sri Vaishnavism mathas, over time, divided into two, those with Tenkalai (southern) tradition and Vadakalai (northern) tradition of Sri Vaishnavism.[91]The Tenkalai-associated mathas are headquartered at Srirangam, while Vadakalai mathas are associated with Kanchipuram. Both these traditions have from 10th-century onwards considered the function ofmathasto include feeding the poor and devotees who visit, hosting marriages and community festivals, farming temple lands and flower gardens as a source for food and worship ingredients, being open to pilgrims as rest houses, and this philanthropic role of these Hindu monasteries continues.[92]In the 15th-century, these monasteries expanded by establishingRamanuja-kutain major South Indian Sri Vaishnavism locations.[92]The organizationally important Sri Vaishnavismmathaare:

Vadakalai and Tenkalai denominations

edit

The Sri Vaishnava tradition is classified into two major denominations called theVadakalai( "northern art" ) andTenkalai( "southern art" ).[28][94]The northern and southern denominations of Sri Vaishnavism refer respectively toKanchipuram(the northern part of Tamil country) andSrirangam(the southern part of Tamil country and Kaveri river delta area where Ramanuja wrote his Vedanta treatises from).[13][14][95]These denominations arose as a result of philosophical and traditional divergences in the post-Ramanuja period. TheVadakalaiplaced emphasis on Sanskrit scriptures such as theVedasandPancharatratexts, while theTenkalaihighlighted Tamil texts such as theNaalayira Divya Prabandhamof theAlvars.[28][96]The philosophies of Pillai Lokacharya and Vedanta Desika, which evolved consequently, were stabilized by Manavala Mamunigal and Brahmatantra Svatantra Jiyar respectively. When the schism weakened, Vadakalai tradition split into Munitreyam,Ahobila Matha,andParakala matha.Similarly, Tenkalai tradition split into Kandadais,Telugu Sri Vaishnavas,Soliyar, and Sikkiliyar.[93]

From the ancient period, the Sri Vaishnavism movement flourished inTamilakamowing to its social inclusiveness, where devotion to the supreme deity (Vishnu) was open without limitation to gender or caste, a tradition led byAlvarsin the 7th and the 8th centuries.[97][98]Ramanuja philosophy negated caste, states Ramaswamy.[99]Ramanuja, who led from the Srirangam temple, welcomed outcastes into temples and gave them important roles in temple duties. Medieval temple records and inscriptions suggest that the payments and offerings collected by the temple were shared regardless of caste distinctions.[100]

Scholars offer differing views on the relative approach of the two denominations on caste and gender. Raman states that Tenkalai did not recognise caste barriers and were more liberal in assimilating people from all castes, possibly because this had been the tradition at Srirangam from the earliest days of Sri Vaishnavism.[100]In contrast, Sadarangani states that it was Vadakalai who were more liberal and who did not recognise caste barriers, possibly because they were competing with the egalitarian Virashaiva Hindus (Lingayatism) of Karnataka.[101]Both sects believe in initiation throughPancha Samskara.[102]This ceremony or rite of passage is necessary for one to become a Vaishnava. It is performed by both Brahmins and non-Brahmins in order to become Vaishnavas.[103]Some non-Brahmin Vaishnavas include TeluguNaidu,TamilVanniyarandNamadhari.[104]Only those Vaishnavas who are of brahmin caste call themselves as Sri Vaishnavas.[105]

The Tenkalai tradition brought into their fold artisanal castes into community-based devotional movements. Raman states, "it can almost be said that the Tenkalai represented the anti-caste tendencies while the Vadakalai school championed the cause of purity of the Vedic tenets."[100]The Tenkalai held, adds Raman, that anyone can be a spiritual teacher regardless of caste.[100]

The Vadakalai tradition states Sadarangani in contrast to Raman's views, were the liberal cousin of Tenkalai and therefore more successful in gaining devotees, while in southern Tamil lands Shaivism prospered possibly because of "Tenkalai school of Vaishnavism being narrow and orthodox in approach".[101]The Vadakalai school not only succeeded in northern Tamil lands, she adds, but spread widely as it inspired theBhakti movementin north, west and east India, bringing in Bhakti poet saints from "entire cross-section of class, caste and society".[101]

Tenkalai ( "southern art" ) - Manavala Mamunigal

edit

TheRanganathaswamy Temple, Srirangambelongs to the Tenkalai/Thennacharya tradition and is considered as one of the important sites of Sri Vaishnava tradition. The temple follows thetenkalaitradition but the priests are mostlyvadakalai.[106]

Tenkalai Sri Vaishnava urdhva pundram

Characteristics

edit

The Tenkalai place higher importance toTamilslokas than Sanskrit, and lay more emphasis on the worship of Vishnu. The Tenkalai acceptprapattias the only means to attain salvation.[107]They consider Prapatti as an unconditional surrender.[108]The Thenkalais follow the TamilPrabandham,[109]and assert primacy to rituals inTamil language.[110]They regardkaivalya(detachment, isolation) as an eternal position within the realm ofVaikuntha(Vishnu's 'eternal abode' or heaven), though it only exists at the outer most regions of Vaikuntha. They further say that God's seemingly contradictory nature as both minuscule and immense are examples of God's special powers that enable Him to accomplish the impossible.

According to the Tenkalai, exalted persons need not perform duties such asSandhyavandanam;they do so only to set a good example. They don't allow the ringing of bells during worship. The Tenkalai forbid widows to shave (tonsure) their head, quoting the Parashara Smriti.[111]while Vadakalais support the tonsure quoting the Manusmriti,[112]

Demographics

edit
Sri Kanchi Prativadibhayankar Jagadguru Anantacharya Gaddi Swamiji, the spiritual preceptor of Tridandi Swami Vishwaksenacharyaji

The Tenkalai trace their lineage toMudaliyandan,nephew of Ramanuja[113]The Tenkalai are followers of the philosophy ofPillai LokacharyaandManavala Mamuni,[114][115]who is considered to be the reincarnation ofRamanujaby the Tenkalai.[note 6]

Many of the main preceptors of Sri Vaishnavism and their descendants, before and after Ramanuja, belong to the Tenkalai denomination.

Notable Tenkalai people

edit

Vadakalai ( "northern art" ) - Vedanta Desika

edit
Vadagalai Sri Vaishnava Urdhva Pundram
Parakala Mutt painting of Vedanta Desikan with Brahmatantra Swatantra Jeeyar

Characteristics

edit

The Vadakalai are followers ofRamanujaandVedanta Desika,[127][128][129]who founded the Vadakalai sampradaya[130]based on the Sanskritic tradition.[131]They lay more emphasis on the role ofLakshmii.e. Sri, and uphold SanskritVedasas the ultimate "Pramanam" or authority, although Ubhaya Vedanta[note 8]is used to infer from and establish the doctrine ofVishishtadvaita.The Vadakalai infer that all of the Alvars compositions are derived from theVedas,and believe that the latter is the ultimate source to reference and defend the doctrine. The Vadakalai lay emphasis on Vedic norms[note 9]as established by Brahmanical tradition. However both vedam and Divya prabandhams are both 2 eyes according to desikar and subsequent acharyas.

The Vadakalai ardently follow theSanskritVedas,[109]and the set of rules prescribed by theManusmritiandDharma Shastras.[132][133]The sect is based on the Sankritic tradition,[134]and the set of rules prescribed by theManusmritiand otherDharma Shastras.[132][133]In Sanskrit the Vadakalai are referred to asUttara Kalārya.[135]

Traditionally, they believe effort and desire along withPrapatti,as means to attain salvation.[136][137]Also, they consider Prapatti as an act of winning grace.[108]

Thetilaka(urdhva pundra) mark of the Vadakalai men is a symbolic representation ofVishnu'sright foot. Since Vishnu's right foot is believed to be the origin of the riverGanga,the Vadakalai contend that his right foot should be held in special veneration, and its sign impressed on the forehead. They also apply a central mark (sricharanam) to symbolise the goddessLakshmi(Vishnu's wife), along with the tiruman (urdhva pundra).[138]The Urdhva Pundra that is vertical and faces upwards denotes that it helps one in reachingVaikuntha(the spiritual abode of Vishnu), and is also considered to be a warder of evil. Vadakalai women apply a red central mark along with namam only, symbolising Lakshmi seated on a lotus on their foreheads.

Guru Parampara

edit
Sri Balmukundacharyaji Maharaj of Jhalariya Mutt, Didwana, Rajasthan

TheVadakalaisect traces its lineage back to Thirukurahi Piran Pillan, Kidambi Acchan and other direct disciples of Ramanuja, and considersVedanta Desikato be the greatest Acharya of the postRamanujaera.[127][139][140]

The Vadakalai community consists of the following groups, based on the sampradaya followed:

  • Pancharatra– Followers of Srimad Azhagiya Singar (Srinivasacharya) of Ahobila Mutt.[141][142][143][144]The majority of Vadakalais belongs to this group.[145]His disciples established Mutts at different places in North India, includingVaranasi,ChitrakootandPushkar.
  • Munitraya– Followers of Srimad Andavan of Andavan Ashramams,[146][147]and Swayamacharyas.[148]TheSrirangam Srimad Andavan Ashramam,Poundarikapuram Andavan Ashramam, and most of the present-day Vadagalai 'svayam-acharya purusha' families are directly connected to this acharya parampara, and follow the worship and ritual patterns outlined by]Gopalarya Mahadesikan.
  • Periya Andavan Srinivasa Mahadesikan;
  • Parakala– They are mostly followers Brahmatantra Swatantra Jeeyar of Parakala Mutt,Mysore.Founded in 1399 by Brahmatantra Parakala Jeeyar, the peetadhipathis of this mutt are the preceptors of the royal family ofMysore Kingdom,Wadiyars. This has stayed as a royal mutt of the kings since then, and is a mutt for all Iyengars under this category.[149][better source needed]

Demographics

edit

Traditionally, places of high importance with significant Vadakalai populations includedKanchipuram,Kumbakonam,Tiruvallur,MysoreandKurnool district.[135][150][151][152][153][154]However, today much of the people have moved to the big cities.

InVrindavan,the Jankivallabh Mandir of Keshighat is a prominent Vadakalai Sri Vaishnava monastic institution and is associated with the spiritual lineage of the Ahobila Mutt. The present Azhagiya Singar has visited this well known institution in the past as well as recently. It is presently headed by Swami Sri Aniruddhacharyaji Maharaj.

InRajasthanthe Jhalariya Mutt is one of the most prominent Mutts and its branches have spread over to the neighbouring regions ofGujaratandMaharashtra.Sri Swami Balmukundacharyaji was a distinguished scholar and renowned Acharya of this Mutt.

Notable Vadakalai people

edit

The hardcore vadakalai strongholds areVaradaraja Perumal Temple,Kanchipuram,Veeraraghava Swamy Temple,Thiruvallur,Kumbakonam,Mysore,Ahobilam,andTirupati

Temples following Srivaishnava Sampradaya

edit

See also

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^Brahman is the metaphysical ultimate unchanging reality in Vedic and post-Vedic Hinduism, and is Vishnu in Sri Vaishnavism.
  2. ^These twoVaishnavismtraditions are respectively called the Sri Vaishnava sampradaya and the Brahma sampradaya.[41]
  3. ^This work is predominantly about the Hindu scriptures called theUpanishadswhich Ramanuja held as the essence of the Vedas.[70]
  4. ^The texts of most of these scholars is lost to history.
  5. ^Brahman is the Vedic concept of metaphysical unchanging reality.[74]
  6. ^He is also known by many other names, such as Azhagiya Manavala Mamunigal, Sundhara Jamatara Muni, Ramya Jamatara Muni, Ramya Jamatara Yogi, Varavaramuni, Yathindhra pravanar, Kanthopayantha, Ramanujan ponnadi, Soumya jamathru yogindhrar, Koil Selva manavala mamunigal etc. He also has the titles Periya Jeeyar, Vellai Jeeyar, Visthavak sikhamani, Poi IllAtha Manavala Mamuni.
  7. ^Ramanujan's father belongs to Thenkalai sect while his mother belongs to Vadakalai sect
  8. ^The Sanskrit Vedas and the Dravida Veda, the composition of Alwars, which are held in equal esteem
  9. ^Also known as anushtaanams

References

edit
  1. ^Faiths across Time [4 volumes]: 5,000 Years of Religious History [4 volumes].Bloomsbury Publishing USA. 15 January 2014.ISBN978-1-61069-026-3.
  2. ^abRanjeeta Dutta 2007,pp. 22–43.
  3. ^John Carman & Vasudha Narayanan 1989,pp. 3–8.
  4. ^abMatchett 2000,p. 4, 200.
  5. ^Matchett 2000,p. 4, 77, 200.
  6. ^abJohn Carman & Vasudha Narayanan 1989,pp. xvii, 3–4.
  7. ^Lester 1966,pp. 266–269.
  8. ^abcdFrancis Clooney & Tony Stewart 2004,pp. 167–168.
  9. ^abJohn Carman & Vasudha Narayanan 1989,pp. 3–4, 36–42, 181.
  10. ^abcdefFlood 1996,p. 136.
  11. ^Morgan 1953.
  12. ^abcJohn Carman & Vasudha Narayanan 1989,pp. 3–4.
  13. ^abcdefgMumme 1987,p. 257.
  14. ^abcdeBryant 2007,pp. 286–287.
  15. ^Bhattacharya, Jogendra Nath (1896).Hindu Castes and Sects.Thacker, Spink. p. 98.ISBN1298966337.The Sri Vaishnavas among the Telingana Brahmans form a distinct caste called Andhra Vaishnava. They are not sub-divided as Vadgala and Tengala like their co-religionists of Dravida
  16. ^Stephan Schuhmacher (1994).The Encyclopedia of Eastern Philosophy and Religion: Buddhism, Hinduism, Taoism, Zen.Shambhala. p. 397.ISBN978-0-87773-980-7.
  17. ^श्रीवैष्णव,Sanskrit-English Dictionary, Koeln University, Germany (2011)
  18. ^Klaus K. Klostermaier (1984).Mythologies and Philosophies of Salvation in the Theistic Traditions of India.Wilfrid Laurier University Press. p. 102.ISBN978-0-88920-158-3.
  19. ^abFlood 1996,p. 135-136.
  20. ^John Carman & Vasudha Narayanan 1989,pp. 3–5.
  21. ^John Carman 1974,pp. 45, 80.
  22. ^abcJon Paul Sydnor (2012).Ramanuja and Schleiermacher: Toward a Constructive Comparative Theology.Casemate. pp. 20–22 with footnote 32.ISBN978-0227680247.
  23. ^"Ramanuja | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy".Retrieved21 July2023.
  24. ^abPatrick Olivelle (1992).The Samnyasa Upanisads: Hindu Scriptures on Asceticism and Renunciation.Oxford University Press. pp. 10–11, 17–18.ISBN978-0-19-536137-7.
  25. ^abcJ.A.B. van Buitenen (2008),Ramanuja - Hindu theologian and Philosopher,Encyclopædia Britannica
  26. ^"Ramanandi Sampradaya".
  27. ^Tattwananda, Swami (1984), Vaisnava Sects, Saiva Sects, Mother Worship (1st revised ed.), Calcutta: Firma KLM Private Ltd., p. 10
  28. ^abcFlood 1996,p. 137.
  29. ^Mumme 1987,pp. 257–266.
  30. ^abcdeJohn Carman 1994,p. 151.
  31. ^John Carman 1994,pp. 151–152.
  32. ^Tapasyananda 2011,p. 53.
  33. ^abBruce M. Sullivan (2001).The A to Z of Hinduism.Rowman & Littlefield. p. 239.ISBN978-0-8108-4070-6.
  34. ^abcJoseph P. Schultz (1981).Judaism and the Gentile Faiths: Comparative Studies in Religion.Fairleigh Dickinson University Press. pp. 81–84.ISBN978-0-8386-1707-6.
  35. ^abStafford Betty (2010), Dvaita, Advaita, and Viśiṣṭādvaita: Contrasting Views of Mokṣa, Asian Philosophy: An International Journal of the Philosophical Traditions of the East, Volume 20, Issue 2, pages 215-224
  36. ^Edward Craig (2000), Concise Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Routledge,ISBN978-0415223645,pages 517-518
  37. ^Sharma 1994,p. 373.
  38. ^abStoker 2011.
  39. ^Sharma 1994,pp. 373–374.
  40. ^Sharma 1994,p. 374.
  41. ^Klostermaier 2007,p. 304.
  42. ^Sharma 1994,pp. 374–375.
  43. ^Bryant 2007,pp. 361–362.
  44. ^John Carman & Vasudha Narayanan 1989,p. 6.
  45. ^Flood 1996,p. 136-137.
  46. ^Flood 1996,p. 137: the tenkalai emphasized the Tamil scriptures and surrender to the Lord by his grace.
  47. ^Jon Paul Sydnor (2012).Ramanuja and Schleiermacher: Toward a Constructive Comparative Theology.Casemate. pp. 10–11.ISBN978-0227680247.
  48. ^abcdefShyam Ranganathan (2011),Rāmānuja (c. 1017 - c. 1137),IEP, York University
  49. ^abcJohn Carman 1994,p. 86.
  50. ^Mayeda 2006,pp. 46–53.
  51. ^Mayeda & Tanizawa (1991), Studies on Indian Philosophy in Japan, 1963–1987, Philosophy East and West, Vol. 41, No. 4, pages 529–535
  52. ^Michael Comans (1996), Śankara and the Prasankhyanavada, Journal of Indian Philosophy, Vol. 24, No. 1, pages 49–71
  53. ^John Carman 1994,pp. 86–88.
  54. ^Julius Lipner(1986), The Face of Truth: A Study of Meaning and Metaphysics in the Vedantic Theology of Ramanuja, State University of New York Press,ISBN978-0887060397,pages 120-123
  55. ^abcJohn Carman 1994,pp. 117–118, 148–153.
  56. ^John Carman 1994,pp. 196–197, for context see 190-201.
  57. ^Klostermaier 2007,pp. 387–389.
  58. ^Lester 1966,pp. 266–282.
  59. ^Klostermaier 2007,p. 487.
  60. ^abcdConstance Jones; James D. Ryan (2006).Encyclopedia of Hinduism.Infobase. p. 490.ISBN978-0-8160-7564-5.
  61. ^abGuy L. Beck (2012).Sonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition.University of South Carolina Press. pp. 119–120.ISBN978-1-61117-108-2.
  62. ^Guy L. Beck (2012).Sonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition.University of South Carolina Press. pp. 118–127.ISBN978-1-61117-108-2.
  63. ^abAlkandavilli Govindacharya (1906).The Life of Râmânujâchârya: The Exponent of the Viśistâdvaita Philosophy.S. Murthy. pp. 9–10 with footnotes.
  64. ^John Sheveland (2013).Piety and Responsibility: Patterns of Unity in Karl Rahner, Karl Barth, and Vedanta Desika.Ashgate Publishing. pp. 113–114.ISBN978-1-4094-8144-7.
  65. ^abChristopher Bartley (2011).An Introduction to Indian Philosophy.Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 177–178.ISBN978-1-84706-449-3.
  66. ^abDalal 2010,p. 399.
  67. ^C. R. Sreenivasa Ayyangar (1908).The Life and Teachings of Sri Ramanujacharya.R. Venkateshwar. pp.130footnote 2.
  68. ^M.C. Alasingaperumal (1900).The Brahmavâdin, Volume 5.Madras: Brahmavâdin Press. pp. 466–467.
  69. ^abJon Paul Sydnor (2012).Ramanuja and Schleiermacher: Toward a Constructive Comparative Theology.Casemate. pp. 2–4.ISBN978-0227680247.
  70. ^abJon Paul Sydnor (2012).Ramanuja and Schleiermacher: Toward a Constructive Comparative Theology.Casemate. p. 4.ISBN978-0227680247.
  71. ^Robert Lester (1966), Ramanuja and Shri Vaishnavism: the Concept of Prapatti or Sharanagati, History of Religion, Volume 5, Issue 2, pages 266-282
  72. ^abcdAnne Hunt Overzee (1992).The Body Divine: The Symbol of the Body in the Works of Teilhard de Chardin and Ramanuja.Cambridge University Press. pp. 30–31.ISBN978-0-521-38516-9.
  73. ^R. Balasubramanian (2000).Advaita Vedānta.Munshiram Manoharlal. p. 9.ISBN978-81-87586-04-3.
  74. ^Jeaneane D. Fowler (2002).Perspectives of Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Hinduism.Sussex Academic Press. p. 49.ISBN978-1-898723-94-3.
  75. ^Anne Hunt Overzee (1992).The Body Divine: The Symbol of the Body in the Works of Teilhard de Chardin and Ramanuja.Cambridge University Press. pp. 63–85.ISBN978-0-521-38516-9.
  76. ^Julius Lipner (1986).The Face of Truth: A Study of Meaning and Metaphysics in the Vedantic Theology of Ramanuja.State University of New York Press. pp. 37–48.ISBN978-0-88706-038-0.
  77. ^Ayyangar, C. R. Sreenivasa (1908).The Life and Teachings of Sri Ramanujacharya.R. Venkateshwar.
  78. ^Seshadri, K. (1998).Srivaishnavism and Social Change.K.P. Bagchi & Company.ISBN978-81-7074-198-5.
  79. ^Paniker, K. Ayyappa (1997).Medieval Indian Literature: Surveys and selections.Sahitya Akademi.ISBN978-81-260-0365-5.
  80. ^Rajagopalachariar, T. (1982).The Vaishnavite Reformers of India: Critical Sketches of Their Lives and Writings.A.D. Publications.
  81. ^Jerry L. Walls (2010).The Oxford Handbook of Eschatology.Oxford University Press. pp. 182–183.ISBN978-0-19-974248-6.
  82. ^Brian A. Hatcher (2015).Hinduism in the Modern World.Routledge. p. 27.ISBN978-1-135-04631-6.
  83. ^abcdefDalal 2010,p. 385.
  84. ^Renganathan, L. (5 January 2012)."Rajagopuram — pride of Srirangam".The Hindu.
  85. ^Vasudeva Rao (2002).Living Traditions in Contemporary Contexts: The Madhva Matha of Udupi.Orient Blackswan. pp. 33–45.ISBN978-81-250-2297-8.
  86. ^Stefan Pertz (2013), The Guru in Me - Critical Perspectives on Management, GRIN Verlag,ISBN978-3638749251,pages 2-3
  87. ^Joel Mlecko (1982),The Guru in Hindu TraditionNumen, Volume 29, Fasc. 1, pages 33-61
  88. ^abJeffery D. Long (2011).Historical Dictionary of Hinduism.Scarecrow. p. 24.ISBN978-0-8108-7960-7.
  89. ^Vasudha Narayanan (2009).Hinduism.The Rosen Publishing Group. pp. 50–51.ISBN978-1-4358-5620-2.
  90. ^Tamara I. Sears (2014).Worldly Gurus and Spiritual Kings: Architecture and Asceticism in Medieval India.Yale University Press. pp. 68–70, 121–122, 159–160.ISBN978-0-300-19844-7.
  91. ^abSteven Paul Hopkins (2002).Singing the Body of God.Oxford University Press. pp. 71–74.ISBN978-0-19-802930-4.
  92. ^abK.V. Raman (2003).Sri Varadarajaswami Temple, Kanchi: A Study of Its History, Art and Architecture.Abhinav Publications. pp. 137–138.ISBN978-81-7017-026-6.
  93. ^abcdefghijklDutta, Ranjeeta (2015)."Reading Community Identities and Traditions: The History and Representation of the Shrivaishnavas of South India".Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences.18(1–2): 141–68.S2CID161734042.
  94. ^Gough 1965,p. 25.
  95. ^Geoffrey Oddie (2013).Hindu and Christian in South-East India.Routledge. pp. 94 footnote 7.ISBN978-1-136-77377-8.Quote:In this context, 'north' refers to the northern region of theTamilcountrywith its capital at Kanchipuram (a historical seat of Sanskrit learning) and 'south' refers to the Kaveri delta with its capital at Srirangam - one of the sacred bastions of Tamil culture. "
  96. ^Mumme 1987,pp. 257–265.
  97. ^C. J. Bartley (2013).The Theology of Ramanuja: Realism and Religion.Routledge. pp. 1–4.ISBN978-1-136-85306-7.
  98. ^P. T. Narasimhachar (2001).The Hill Temple.Sahitya Akademi. pp. xviii.ISBN978-81-260-0814-8.
  99. ^Ramaswamy, Vijaya (1985),Textiles and weavers in medieval South India,Oxford University Press, p. 61,ISBN978-0-19-561705-4,retrieved17 April2016
  100. ^abcdK.V., Raman (2003),Sri Varadarajaswami Temple, Kanchi: A Study of Its History, Art and Architecture,Abhinav Publications, pp. 132–133,ISBN9788170170266,retrieved16 April2016
  101. ^abcNeeti M. Sadarangani (2004).Bhakti Poetry in Medieval India: Its Inception, Cultural Encounter and Impact.Sarup & Sons. pp. 19–20.ISBN978-81-7625-436-6.
  102. ^Roshen Dalal.Hinduism: An Alphabetical Guide.Penguin Books India, 2010. p. 385.
  103. ^Gengnagel, Jörg; Hüsken, Ute; Raman, Srilata (2005).Words and Deeds: Hindu and Buddhist Rituals in South Asia.Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, 2005. p. 91.ISBN9783447051521.
  104. ^Young, Katherine (2021).Turbulent Transformations: Non-Brahmin Śrīvaiṣṇavas on Religion, Caste and Politics in Tamil Nadu.Orient BlackSwan.ISBN978-81-949258-8-0.
  105. ^Jagadeesan, N. (1977).History of Sri Vaishnavism in the Tamil Country: Post-Ramanuja.Koodal Publishers.Tirukkachchi Nambi and Pillai Uranga Villi Dasar, great names in Sri Vaishnava tradition, cannot be called Sri Vaishnavas because they were not Brahmins.
  106. ^Madabhushini Narasimhacharya.Sri Ramanuja.Sahitya Akademi, 2004. p. 27.
  107. ^Coward 2008,p. 141.
  108. ^abThomas Manninezhath (1993).Harmony of Religions: Vedānta Siddhānta Samarasam of Tāyumānavar.Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 35–.ISBN978-81-208-1001-3.
  109. ^ab"Tamil Nadu, Religious Condition under Vijaya Nagar Empire".Tamilnadu.ind.in.Retrieved4 January2012.
  110. ^Srinivasan & Mukherjee 1976.
  111. ^Pg.66 The Indian historical review, Volume 17; Indian Council of Historical Research, Vikas Pub. House
  112. ^Pg.65 The Indian historical review, Volume 17; Indian Council of Historical Research, Vikas Pub. House
  113. ^"Swami Mudaliandan Thirumaligai".mudaliandan.Retrieved14 April2016.
  114. ^Pandey, Vraj Kumar (2007).Pg.86 Encyclopaedia of Indian philosophy, Volume 1, by Vraj Kumar Pandey, Anmol Publications.Anmol Publications.ISBN9788126131129.Retrieved4 January2012.
  115. ^Subrahmanian, N.; Tamil̲An̲Pan̲; Jeyapragasam, S. (1976).Pg.108 Homage to a Historian:a festschrift – by N. Subrahmanian, Tamilanpan, S.Jeyapragasam, Dr. N. Subrahmanian 60th Birthday Celebration Committee, in association with Koodal Publishers.Retrieved4 January2012.
  116. ^Srinivasa Ramanujan Aiyangar; Bruce C. Berndt; Robert Alexander Rankin (2001).Ramanujan: Essays and Surveys.American Mathematical Soc. pp. 89–.ISBN978-0-8218-2624-9.
  117. ^D. C. V. Mallik (10 September 2000)."K. S. Krishnan and the Kodaikanal Observatory"(PDF).Current Science.79(5). Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 8 August 2017.Retrieved9 July2023.
  118. ^Ram Godar (27 December 2013),Guruji B.K.S. Iyengar's 95th Birthday Celebrations,archivedfrom the original on 14 December 2021,retrieved9 April2016
  119. ^Parlato, Frank Jr."People that Swami Vivekanand- Frank Parlato Jr".vivekananda.net.Archived fromthe originalon 11 April 2013.Retrieved9 April2016.
  120. ^"Memoirs of European travel I".ramakrishnavivekananda.info.Retrieved9 April2016.
  121. ^"Complete_Works_of_Swami_Vivekananda_-_Vol_7"(PDF).
  122. ^"Prolific Tamil writer Sujatha passes away".The Hindu.28 February 2008.ISSN0971-751X.Retrieved9 April2016.
  123. ^"Ariyakudi"(PDF).Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 22 April 2016.Retrieved14 April2016.
  124. ^"The first crossing".The Hindu.14 January 2007.ISSN0971-751X.Retrieved14 April2016.
  125. ^"ARIYAKUDI".carnatica.net.Retrieved14 April2016.
  126. ^"Why was Iyengar Brahmin J Jayalalithaa buried instead of being cremated".DNA India.
  127. ^abT. V. Kuppuswamy (Prof.), Shripad Dattatraya Kulkarni (1966).History of Tamilakam. Darkness at horizon.Shri Bhagavan Vedavyasa Itihasa Samshodhana Mandira. p. 166.
  128. ^Sociology of religion, Volume 1 – by Joachim Wach, University of Chicago press, 1944.3 November 1958. p. 129.Retrieved20 November2011.
  129. ^Kabir, the apostle of Hindu-Muslim unity: interaction of Hindu-Muslim ideas in the formation of the bhakti movement with special reference to Kabīr, the bhakta – Muhammad Hedayetullah, Motilal Banarsidass publication, 1977.p. 107.Retrieved20 November2011.
  130. ^"Britannica Online Encyclopedia".Britannica.Retrieved20 November2011.
  131. ^"Astadasabhedanirnaya".Adityaprakashan.Retrieved20 November2011.
  132. ^abNisith Ranjan Ray (1993).Dimensions of National Integration: The Experiences and Lessons of Indian History.Punthi-Pustak & Institute of Historical Studies. p. 150.ISBN978-81-85094-62-5.
  133. ^abThe Indian Historical Review.Vol. 17. Vikas Publishing House. 1990. p. 65.
  134. ^"Astadasabhedanirnaya".Adityaprakashan.Retrieved4 January2012.
  135. ^abStudents' Britannica India.p. 205.Retrieved20 November2011.
  136. ^Dharma (1 February 1996).Philosophy of Nārāyaṇīyam: Study, Text & Śloka Index.Nag Publishers. p. 199.ISBN978-81-7081-337-8.
  137. ^"Srimad Rahasya Traya Saraby Shri Vedanta Desika – under the subtopicUpaya Vibhaga Adhikara".munitrayam.org. Archived fromthe originalon 16 March 2012.Retrieved4 January2012.
  138. ^Modern India and the Indians, by M.Monier Williams.26 July 2001. p. 194.Retrieved20 November2011.
  139. ^Wach, Joachim (11 June 1991).Pg.129 Sociology of religion, Volume 1 – by Joachim Wach, University of Chicago press, 1944.University of Chicago Press.ISBN9780226867083.Retrieved4 January2012.
  140. ^Hedayetullah, Muhammad (1977).Pg.107 Kabir, the apostle of Hindu-Muslim unity: interaction of Hindu-Muslim ideas in the formation of the bhakti movement with special reference to Kabīr, the bhakta – Muhammad Hedayetullah, Motilal Banarsidass publication, 1977.Motilal Banarsidass.ISBN9788120806115.Retrieved4 January2012.
  141. ^Tirupati Balaji was a Buddhist shrine, Sanjivan Publications, 1991.Retrieved20 November2011.
  142. ^"Vadakalai Srivaishnava Festivals' Calendar – The source mentions Pancharatra & Munitraya Krishna Jayantis celebrated by Ahobila Mutt & Andavan Ashrams respectively".Trsiyengar. Archived fromthe originalon 3 October 2011.Retrieved20 November2011.
  143. ^"Ahobila Mutt's Balaji Mandir Pune, Calendar – The calendar mentions Ahobila Mutt disciples celebrating Krishna Jayanti as" Pancharatra Sri Jayanti "".Sribalajimandirpune. Archived fromthe originalon 9 October 2011.Retrieved20 November2011.
  144. ^"Sri Krishna & Janmashtami – Essence of Srivaishnava Practices".Trsiyengar. Archived fromthe originalon 3 October 2011.Retrieved20 November2011.
  145. ^The Cultural Heritage of India: Sri Ramakrishna centenary memorial, published by – Sri Ramakrishna centenary committee.16 July 2009. p. 1000.Retrieved20 November2011.
  146. ^Rāmānuja sampradāya in Gujarat:a historical perspective.Somaiya Publications. p. 31.Retrieved20 November2011.
  147. ^Srivaishnavism and social change – by K.seshadri, K.P.Bagchi & co publishers.p. 82.Retrieved20 November2011.
  148. ^The Cultural Heritage of India:The Religious.Ramakrishna Mission, Institute of Culture. 1956. p. 182.
  149. ^"Sri Parakala Matham > Sri Matham > History".
  150. ^Studies in history, Volume 1, Issue 1; Jawaharlal Nehru University. Centre for Historical Studies.Sage. 1979. p. 14.Retrieved20 November2011.
  151. ^Gazetteer of South India, Volume 2 – By W. Francis, Mittal Publications.p. 561.Retrieved20 November2011.
  152. ^Indian philosophy & culture, Volumes 3–4; Vrindāvan (India) Institute of Oriental Philosophy, Vaishnava Research Institute, Vrindāban, India.1 January 1984. p. 33.Retrieved20 November2011.
  153. ^Ontological and morphological concepts of Lord Sri Chaitanya and his mission, Volume 1; Bhakti Vilās Tīrtha Goswāmi Maharāj, Navadwīpa Dhām Prachārini Sabha; Pub' – Sree Gaudiya Math, 1994.2 October 2009. p. 240.Retrieved20 November2011.
  154. ^Studies in social history: modern India; O. P. Bhatnagar, India. University Grants Commission, University of Allahabad. Dept. of Modern Indian History; St. Paul's Press Training School, 1964.1 January 2006. p. 129.Retrieved20 November2011.
  155. ^"The Life of Srila Gopala Bhatta Goswami; His Vadakalai origin is mentioned in the article, where Vadakalai is spelled as" Badagalai "(Some in Northern India often substitute the Alpha bet V with B)".Prabhupadanugas.eu. 22 January 2011.Retrieved20 November2011.
  156. ^"TimesContent – Photo of Rajagopalachari – He wears the Vadakalai Tilak on his forehead".Retrieved20 November2011.
  157. ^Jogendra Nath Bhattacharya (1896).Hindu Castes and Sects: An Exposition on the Origins of Hindu caste system.Thacker, Spink & Co. p.78.
  158. ^Jawaharlal Memorial Fund (1972).Selected Works of Jawaharlal Nehru.Orient Longman. p. 440.
  159. ^"A Vedic scholar enters his 100th year".The Hindu.India. 30 March 2007. Archived fromthe originalon 12 October 2007.Retrieved20 November2011.
  160. ^"ReelshowInt MAG".Mag.reelshowint. 15 June 2010. Archived fromthe originalon 28 March 2012.Retrieved20 November2011.

Bibliography

edit

Further reading

edit
  • Dictionary of Hindu Lore and Legend(ISBN0-500-51088-1) by Anna Dallapiccola
  • The Vernacular Veda: Revelation, Recitation, and Ritual(Univ of South Carolina Press, Columbia, South Carolina, U.S.A. 1 January 1994), by Vasudha Narayanan
  • Understanding Hinduism,(ISBN1844832015), by Vasudha Narayanan
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sri_Vaishnavism&oldid=1259482461"