Talk:Common snipe

Latest comment:13 days agoby MPF in topic(Another) wrong picture

Common and Wilson's Snipe

edit

Common and Wilson's Snipe have been officially split for a few years now. I've split both articles. I hope it works for everyone.......Pmeleski00:10, 2 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sound file is wrong

edit

The sound file is completely wrong, there is no "scape scape" nor drumming in this sound file. The proper sound file can be heard at whatbird. It is a clear and very distinctive sound. Unfortunately I am unable to link due to an erroneous spam glitch--Tallard(talk)17:32, 1 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Requested moves

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal.Please do not modify it.Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal wasmovedbyMaterialscientist.--BDD(talk)18:30, 6 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

– Invert the redirections as the consensus and guidelines recommend not to capitalise the common (vernacular) names of species. SeeWikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Bird common name decapitalisationandWikipedia:Manual of Style#Animals, plants, and other organisms.Coreyemotela(talk)09:26, 4 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Support,finally. If this is proceeding according to some category-walking patterns, be it taxonomic or geographical, that seems like a good idea. Anyone who's taking on the downcasing in the actual article text, please seeWikipedia talk:WikiProject Birds#The conversion is challenging;there are devils in the details. There's talk elsewhere of using bots or AWB scripts to move a lot of these articles and decapitalize within them, but I suspect this will be difficult to sort out, and the work might as well get started manually while that is worked up.A deeper question is how many of these are at IOC names that are not actually theWP:COMMONNAMEs,and thus need a different kind of move, for article titling policy reasons (many IOC names are made up by IOC and are unattested outside their own materials. Sometimes the scientific name is most common, in other cases other English-language or assimilated non-English names are common and the IOC ones are neologisms. Inmostcases the IOC names are fine. — SMcCandlish¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼ 19:49, 4 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • YPages were moved byMaterialscientist(talk·contribs).Coreyemotela(talk)17:32, 6 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.Please do not modify it.Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Wrong picture

edit

The picture of the Gallinago gallinago feroeensis actually shows a whimbrel, Numenius phaeopus. I suppressed it. Jachaus(talk)08:08, 15 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

(Another) wrong picture

edit

The main photo above the taxobox is from Wales, Utah (not Wales in the UK) and is evidently of the North American Wilson’s snipeGallinago delicata(distinct fromGallinago gallinagoas of the 2007 creation of theWilson's snipearticle).Birdsage3(talk)20:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Birdsage3Replaced, with one from Spain. Thanks for pointing this out! -MPF(talk)16:59, 12 November 2024 (UTC)Reply