Wikipedia

Talk:Dresden

Latest comment:1 month agoby 95.194.209.79 in topicRemoving “Drježdźany”
Learn more about this page
Former good article nomineeDresdenwas agood articlesnominee, but did not meet thegood article criteriaat the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can berenominated.Editors may also seek areassessmentof the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 27, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
January 2, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status:Former good article nominee

You maywant to increment{{Archive basics}}to|counter= 2asTalk:Dresden/Archive 1is larger than the recommended150Kb.

edit
Latest comment:8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link onDresden.Please take a moment to reviewmy edit.You may add{{cbignore}}after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add{{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thecheckedparameter below totrueorfailedto let others know (documentation at{{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018,"External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot.No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verificationusing the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permissionto delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfCbefore doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online04:45, 30 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment:7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 17 external links onDresden.Please take a moment to reviewmy edit.If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQfor additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thecheckedparameter below totrueorfailedto let others know (documentation at{{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018,"External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot.No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verificationusing the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permissionto delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfCbefore doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)22:45, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment:7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links onDresden.Please take a moment to reviewmy edit.If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQfor additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018,"External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot.No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verificationusing the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permissionto delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfCbefore doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)01:29, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment:6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links onDresden.Please take a moment to reviewmy edit.If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQfor additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018,"External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot.No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verificationusing the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permissionto delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfCbefore doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)21:56, 2 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Foreign language names and the Frauenkirche

edit
Latest comment:6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

@LechitaPL:regarding foreign names: A google search reveals a total of just over 2 million results (including double counting, including pages which are not truly in English, etc) for those 3 variants total, separated as follows:

  • Drjezdzany yields 80k results, including WP mirrors/other Wiki- projects and many pages which are not in English...,[1]
  • Drazdany yields more but those are mostly non-English[2](only 2 English results (WP and Wiktionary) in first 5 pages of results...
  • And "Drezno" yields 800k results, but those are[3]again mostly in Polish (the only non-Polish pages I can find, at a glance, are this one, a WP disambig page, Wiktionary, etc... - you get the picture)

As for Dresden, I find more than 120 million results for it. As such, these variants are not relevant under MOS:QUOTENAME and need not be mentioned. As was explained in the previous discussions, the Gdansk vote does not apply to this since the city does not have "a shared history with Poland" unless you use a very tenuous description of the term (which was rejected). Even if that vote did apply, the city is universally referred to (in English) asDresden,unless maybe in listings of foreign language names. As such, There is no reason to include the Polish name, or any of the other translated names, except maybe in a "Names" section (and even then, arguing that we should include the Czech or Polish names is as bad an argument as saying that we should also include French "Dresde", Italian "Dresda", and so on - an English speaker is very unlikely to use those terms to look for this city, and the city was never Czech or Polish, so there's little historical ground for including them - the Sorbian name can go in the Etymology/Early history section, where it already is).
regarding the Frauenkirche: The bombing of the city is already mentioned earlier in the lead, and no detail is given for either of the three other buildings. No reason we should go in too much details about this in the lead - simply mentioning that it was destroyed and rebuilt gives a better summary of the topic (details about the Frauenkirche and why it wasn't rebuilt go either lower in the article, or in the article about the church itself). Giving all those details in the intro would beWP:UNDUE.198.84.253.202(talk)15:24, 17 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Dubious climate table

edit
Latest comment:11 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The climate table for 1991-2020 period for some reason shows the same precipitation asDüsseldorf,which made me doubt about the whole table. I made a new one for an older period. Please verify the weather box if you can.PAper GOL(talk)18:53, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Found my answer. The precipitation values are for Dusseldorf not Dresden. I'm gonna fix it.PAper GOL(talk)19:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Request to rename "Soviet Republic of Saxony"

edit
Latest comment:8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A request has been made to rename "Soviet Republic of Saxony" to "Saxony in the German Revolution (1918–1919)". With the renaming, "Soviet Republic of Saxony" would be removed from this page's infobox.

Please join the discussionhere.GHStPaulMN(talk)15:33, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Removing “Drježdźany”

edit
Latest comment:1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In line with the purging of German names in Slavic countries, Slavic names should likewise be removed herefrom95.194.209.79(talk)12:53, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dresden&oldid=1249508343"