Talk:Four Go houses

(Redirected fromTalk:Four go houses)
Latest comment:3 years agoby Lennart97 in topicRequested move 8 November 2021

Proposed merge

edit

I suggest merging the four individual houses into this article. They're a bit rudimentary at the moment, and I don't think we gain by diluting content over so many pages. If nobody minds, I will do the merge in a month's time, ie. Nov 21.ReykYO!06:44, 21 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 11 October 2021

edit
The following is a closed discussion of arequested move.Please do not modify it.Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider amove reviewafter discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus has emerged after more than 2 weeks. Editors disagree on what rules apply.(non-admin closure)(t·c)buidhe09:56, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply



Four go housesFour Go houses– By convention, "Go"is the correct capitalization for the game. The article and the redirect need to be swapped.Coastside(talk)07:15, 11 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

This is a contested technical request (permalink).Anthony Appleyard(talk)16:22, 11 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
This is the same discussion asthis discussion.I am suggesting formalizing the convention of capitalizing "Go" in the WikiProject because this keeps coming up. In short the convention on Wikipedia is to capitalize Go, which is consistent with reliable sources includingGo World.I believe sources generally do it that way to avoid readability issues because of the English verb "go". Also, definitely not "Four Go Houses", because that's not a formal name for them.Coastside(talk)16:56, 11 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed.Please do not modify it.Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Honinbo gone lost

edit

I came to Wikipedia to find the chronology of the 21 Honinbos. Such information has been here, under Honinbo of course, but seems lost. Unfortunately, today Honinbo redirects to "Four go houses" ( "Four Go houses" would have been better, go is an extremely common English word, and common usage is to capitalize the name of the game to avoid confusion). There seems to be no content about the Honinbo House other than the single sentence "The Hon'inbō house was easily the strongest school of Go for most of its existence. It was established in 1612 and survived until 1940." The French Wikipedia has the data I was looking for (Sansa 1612-1623, Sanetsu 1630-1658, Doetsu 1658-1677, Dosaku 1677-1702,..., Shusai 1908-1940). This list should be given under Honinbo, with links to the individual Honinbos that have their own article. There is no relation whatsoever between the Four Go Houses and the modern honorary Honinbos. That subsection belongs under Honinbo, not here. Also the data for the other houses was lost. The text still shows that there used to be more data. For example, under Yasui: "The retirement or posthumous names are listed here", while in fact nothing is listed.— Precedingunsignedcomment added by2001:980:3FF4:1:B62E:99FF:FE4C:71C3(talk)15:45, 17 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

I found the list your are looking for[1].This was just before the article was merged into this combined article on theFour Go houses.There is such a western bias in Wikipedia that there are so many more articles on chess than on Go, even though more people play Go than chess (just in Asia vs. Western countries), and Go is a far older game with a rich history. There were stub articles on each of the Go houses, but they were merged(seediscussion above).I suggested moving the list of Honinbo title holders back in this article, at least for now. The problem is that instead of developing these articles further, editors see it as trivia and delete it. Again, it's a western bias that somehow articles on Go need to be condensed and abbreviated — the opposite of what happens in the articles on chess.Coastside(talk)19:16, 17 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
I think the issue is more that most WP editors are English speakers and for some stuff English-language sources are not readily available. It's not that people are biased against covering it.ReykYO!19:33, 17 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Coastside: Yes, thanks, in[2].Reyk: The problem was not the sourcing, also in English there are printed references, and lots of official web pages. Information was deleted. A page was created with material unrelated to its title, where the text still refers to the deleted info. I fixed a few things but am not sure I am permitted to move or rename pages.— Precedingunsignedcomment added by2001:980:3FF4:1:B62E:99FF:FE4C:71C3(talk)15:21, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 8 November 2021

edit
The following is a closed discussion of arequested move.Please do not modify it.Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider amove reviewafter discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was:moved.(closed by non-admin page mover)Lennart97(talk)17:54, 15 November 2021 (UTC)Reply


Four go housesFour Go houses– Although this question was considered very recently here, with a "no consensus" conclusion, a new consensus appears to have emerged in the meantime. After discussion atTalk:Mirror Go#Requested move 11 October 2021,Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Go#Add capitalization of Go to Guidelines,andWikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters#Add convention of capitalizing Go,theMOS:GAMECAPSguideline now says "The name of the gameGois capitalized,"with a note that says"Reliable sources conventionally capitalizeGobecause of readability issues given the common English verbgo."—⁠ ⁠BarrelProof(talk)16:05, 8 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed.Please do not modify it.Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.