Talk:Samsung S8300 UltraTouch

Requested move 6 November 2021

The following is a closed discussion of arequested move.Please do not modify it.Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider amove reviewafter discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was:Not movedper consensus in discussion. Opponents argued that the move would violateMOS:TM,WP:TITLETM,andWP:ALLCAPSCombefere❯❯❯Talk00:49, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

---

Samsung S8300 UltraTouch→Samsung S8300 UltraTOUCH– As marketed, mentioned in prose, and apparently prevalently used in web search results.~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4(talk)04:06, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

• Oppose:Leaning against, perMOS:TM/WP:TITLETM/WP:ALLCAPS.The partial all-caps is purely promotional styling, and the camelcase is much more like an ordinary brand name in English.CNETdoesn't use it. Some others don't either – e.g.,hereandhereandhere.It's not an abbreviation. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof(talk)00:23, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

• Oppose:perMOS:TM,WP:TITLETMandWP:ALLCAPS.AtWP:TITLETM:Article titles follow standard English text formatting in the case of trademarks, unless the trademarked spelling is demonstrably the most common usage in sources independent of the owner of the trademark.AGoogle searchandGoogle bookssearch indicates that there probably isn't good reason to retain camel case either but to render the title asSamsung S8300 Ultra Touch.Regards,Cinderella157(talk)01:41, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed.Please do not modify it.Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.