Atandem wingis awing configurationin which a flying craft or animal has two or more sets ofwingsset one behind another. All the wings contribute tolift.

QAC Quickie Q2

The tandem wing is distinct from thebiplanein which the wings are stacked one above another, or from thecanardor "tail-first" configuration where the forward surface is much smaller and does not contribute significantly to the overall lift.

In aviation, tandem wings have long been experimented with, but few designs have ever been put into production.

Tandem wings in nature occur only in insects and flying fish, although in the past there have been tandem-wing flying reptiles.

Design principles

edit

Atandem wingconfigurationhas two mainwingplanes, with one located forward and the other to the rear. The difference is greater than the wing chord, so there is a clear gap between them and the aircraft centre of gravity (CG) lies between the wings.[1]Compared to the conventional layout, where the tailplane exerts little or no vertical force in cruising flight, both tandem wings contribute substantially to lift.

The basic tandem configuration uses wings which are equal in size and in line with each other. Examples have flown successfully, such as the Peyret glider of 1922. However the rear wing is usually placed either above or below the fore wing, in order to avoid its turbulent wake. One wing is often made a little smaller than the other, according to the details of the design. Indeed, there are no clear dividing lines between the conventional vs. tandem, or the tandem vs.canardconfigurations.[2]The high-mounted fore wing and low-mounted aft wing arrangement is also sometimes treated as an extreme staggered biplane and referred to as the Nénandovich biplane.[3]

Interference effects between the two wings can make a tandem layout less efficient in cruise than the equivalent conventional design, however examples such as theScaled Composites Proteusare capable of exceptional efficiency.

The tandem layout creates a "slot effect" in which the front wing deflects air downwards over the rear wing, reducing the angle of attack (AoA) of the rear. At high aircraft AoA, this causes the front wing to stall first, allowing safer flight at low speeds than the equivalent conventional layout. It also offers good STOL performance.[1]

Tandem wings have also been used onground-effect vehicles,where the front wing is used to direct air downwards beneath the rear wing to create a lifting air cushion.

Stability, control and trim

edit

In a tandem wing the lift forces on the two wings are separated longitudinally, allowing them to act together to achieve stability, control and trim. The mechanisms of stability and control for a tandem wing are similar to those for the tail-first orcanardlayout; the distinction is mainly in the relative size of the forward surface.[4]

However, the larger trim forces available compared to a smaller tailplane or foreplane mean that a tandem design can offer a greater range of trim conditions, and hence ofcentre of gravity(CG) location than other layouts, which can offer a practical solution where weight loadings and distributions may vary during operations. However a wide CG range leads to other problems, including a compatible undercarriage layout and safe stalling characteristics.[1]

Joined wing

edit

The joined wing is a tandem-wing layout in which the front wing sweeps back and/or the rear wing sweeps forwards such that they join at or near the tips to form a continuous surface in a hollow diamond or triangle shape.[5][6]The joined wing is also an example of aclosed wing.

TheLigeti Stratosis a rare example to have flown.[7]

Structural design

edit

In a conventional layout, the moment arm of the outer section's lifting load is large, and this stresses the root section. However, in a tandem design each wing is smaller and the outer load is absent. This allows the wing structure to be lighter overall.

In a conventional design, the fuselage is supported only in one place, with the fore and aft fuselage sections cantilevered out from it. This creates significant bending stresses. A tandem wing supports the same fuselage in two places, reducing the bending stresses. However the torsion stresses on the centre section between the wings are greater.[1]

Because it is more compact, the tandem-wing structure is stiffer overall, meaning that less allowance needs to be made for bending, and a smaller safety margin in stress levels is possible, allowing yet further weight and cost reduction.[1]

History

edit

Pioneers

edit
Langley Aerodrome, modified (1914)

The tandem wing configuration predates successful manned flight. As far back as the fifteenth century,Tito Livio Burraitniexperimented with a tandem-wing model. Four sets of wings in tandem variously provided lift and propulsion, and Burraitni's cat became the first aeronaut to fly in a tandem design.[1]

Having also flown simpler fore-and-aft tandem models of up to 14 feet (4.3 m) in span, in 1903Samuel Pierpont Langleybuilt a full-size tandem-wing monoplane, theAerodrome,and launched it from the roof of a houseboat. It failed to fly. After his death theSmithsonian Institutionsought to prove that he had flown in the weeks before theWright brothers,and employed successful planemakerGlenn Curtissto secretly modify the aerodrome until it could fly, as "proof" that it had flown in 1903. Curtiss added floats and made other improvements, enabling it to undertake short hops as a true waterplane in 1914. The ruse was eventually exposed, yet the Smithsonian still sought to claim that the 1902 version had been "capable of flight". It would be many more years before they recanted.[8]

Blériot VI Libellule (1907)

Several pioneers had long made successful gliders. In 1905John J. Montgomeryflew a tandem monoplane glider, confirming that the aerodynamic principle was sound.

Powered flight followed two years later. In 1906Louis Blériotbuilt histhird aeroplanewith tandem elliptical closed wings, later modifying it as his type IV with the fore wing converted into a conventional biplane. But it was not until the next year that histype VI,a wheeled tandem monoplane of broadly similar configuration to Langley's Aerodrome, became the first tandem-wing aeroplane to fly.

Between 1907 and 1911, the aerodynamics studies ofGustave Eiffelshowed that the tandem layout was inherently less aerodynamically efficient that the more conventional.[4]Overlapping with Eiffel's work, Stefan Driezewicki developed and wind-tunnel tested an inherently stable tandem-wing design. He then built and successfully flew a full-sized example at the end of 1912.[1]

Interwar period

edit

Experimental tandem-wing aircraft continued to be built after World War I.

TheCaproni Ca.60prototype flying boat comprised a long passenger-carrying hull to which were attached in tandem three stacks of triplane wings from the successfulCa.4line of heavy bombers and airliners, earning it the nickname "Capronissimo". However it broke up on its first attempted takeoff in 1921.

The first fully controllable tandem-wing type was the French-builtPeyret tandem glider,which won the first British gliding competition in 1922.Peyret'snovel control system comprised full-span trailing edge surfaces on all four wings. These operated in pairs on each side as ailerons, in pairs fore and aft as elevators, and synchronously as flaps for low-speed flight. The system proved effective and, despite the glider being less efficient than the conventional high-aspect-ratio entries, it proved more controllable and manoeuvrable. This enabled the pilot M. Maneyrol to remain in updraughts for longer than the others.[4]Although Peyret continued to develop the design, in both gliders and powered types, they remained a curiosity.

AMignet Pou-du-Ciel

TheSFCAcontinued the work of Peyret after he died, adopting his control system. TheirTaupinfirst flew in 1933. Its design proved practical and some 52 examples were produced.

MeanwhileHenri Mignetwas taking a very different approach to flight control. Intended for amateurs to build at home, hisPou-du-Ciel(flying flea) had a novel two-axis control system to make it easy to fly. No ailerons were needed because when the rudder was operated, yaw-roll coupling ensured that the plane banked into a turn. For pitch control the whole front wing tilted to act as a canard elevator. Introduced at much the same time as the Taupin, it became a craze, hundreds were built and variations developed in many countries. However stability issues relating to the variable front wing could lead to lethal crashes in the hands of the novice pilot, and the type eventually fell out of favour.

World War II period

edit
TheMiles M.39B Libellulaperformed well but the requirement for its successor was cancelled.

During the late 1930s,Maurice Delannewas working on tandem-wing designs. He proposed a fighter, the Delanne 10, featuring a gulled forward wing and twin fins on the tips of the low-set and slightly shorter-span rear wing. He first built two examples of a smaller aerodynamic test aircraft, theDelanne 20-T,which flew in 1938. TheArsenal de l'Aéronautiquethen constructed a prototype fighter, theArsenal-Delanne 10.It was completed and test-flown after the German invasion of France, and was then taken to Germany for further testing.

MeanwhileWestland Aircraftwere considering a modification of theLysanderlight observation and liaison aircraft, by adding a rear gun turret to give it some protection from attack. The Lysander already had a suitable main wing, so to support the weight of the turret Westland thought of adding a Delanne-type rear wing. By now hostilities had started but France had not yet fallen. Chief DesignerW. E. W. "Teddy" Petterand Chief Test PilotHarald Penroseflew to Paris, where Penrose flew one of the 20-Ts and reported favourably on its handling.[9]The tandem Lysander was not completed until 1941, when Penrose began test flights. Although it performed flawlessly – he wrote that "here was a military prototype that needed no alteration" – it was not ordered into production.[10]

George Milessaw the tandem Lysander atRAF Boscombe Downand realised its potential as a short-span, short-take-off Naval fighter. The ensuingMiles M.35 Libellulatest aircraft differed from the Delanne design in having wings of approximately equal span, but with the rear wing given a longer chord and swept back. Although the design was rejected, it flew well enough to prompt development of the largerM.39B,a subscale test aircraft for the proposed M.39 high-speed bomber to meet Specification B.11/41. This time the fore wing was smaller and mounted low, while the swept rear wing was high-mounted with twin engine nacelles slung beneath. Flying in 1943 it performed well, but the bomber requirement was subsequently cancelled.

Postwar

edit

After WWII, interest returned to the Flying Flea's tilting forewing concept and, with its worst dangers now understood and fixed, designers have continued to develop the idea, typically still for home construction.[1]

TheCurtiss-Wright X-19of 1963 marked the entry of the tandem wing configuration into the VTOL arena, as a quadrotor convertiplane, with large tilting proprotors mounted on each wing tip. It proved overly complex and unreliable for the technology of the day.

Other tandem approaches such as the Delanne were largely forgotten, until David Lockspeiser conceived of his Land Development Aircraft, a low-cost utility transport. It was to utilise three interchangeable wing component; one each mounted high up for the left and right rear wings, and a third fore wing mounted centrally beneath the nose. His prototypeLDA-01flew in 1971. It proved successful enough to develop for production, but the project ended before it could be modified.

Scaled Composites Proteus(1998)

The next breakthrough to manufacture came once again in the homebuilt market. Up-and-coming maverick designerBurt Rutanwas working on a low-powered but highly efficient plane for home construction. The tandem layout offered a low-drag fixed undercarriage installation, by placing the main wheels in housings at the tips of the fore wing and applying anhedral to raise the fuselage high enough for a propeller. The high-mounted rear wing had compensating dihedral. The Quickie first flew in 1977 and the next year won the EAA's Outstanding New Design Award at Oshkosh. It became popular, and several variants subsequently appeared.

Rutan set upScaled Compositesand some of the company's later designs were also tandems.

List of tandem-wing aircraft

edit
This list is incomplete. Please help by expanding it
Type Country Class Role Date Status No. Notes
Airbus A³ Vahana US Propeller Private 2018 Prototype 2 Tiltwing personal air vehicle.
Arsenal-Delanne 10 France Propeller Fighter 1940 Prototype 1
Blériot III/IV France Propeller Experimental 1906 Project 1 Failed to fly as either the III or IV.
Blériot VI France Propeller Experimental 1907 Prototype 1
Caproni Ca.60 Italy Propeller Transport 1921 Prototype 1 Nine-wing triple-tandem triplane.
Croses Pouplume France Propeller 1960 Home build Ultralight
Curtiss-Wright X-19 US Propeller Experimental 1963 Prototype 2 Four-engined tiltrotorconvertiplane
Delanne 20-T France Propeller Experimental 1938 Prototype 2 Test plane for theArsenal-Delanne 10fighter.
Moscow Aviation Institute Sh-Tandem USSR Prototype Attack 1937 Prototype 1 Also known as the Grushin Sh-Tandem. MAI-3.[11]
Langley Aerodrome US Propeller Experimental 1902 Project 1 Failed to take off.
Ligeti Stratos Australia Propeller Private 1985 Prototype 2 Joined wing. (Cited in main text)
Lockspeiser LDA-01 UK Propeller Utility 1971 Prototype 1
Mauboussin Hémiptère France Propeller Experimental 1936 Prototype 1
Mignet Pou-du-Ciel France Propeller Private 1933 Homebuilt
Miles M.35 Libellula UK Propeller Experimental 1942 Prototype 1 proof of concept for carrier fighter
Miles M.39B Libellula UK Propeller Experimental 1943 Prototype 1 scale prototype for tandem wing jet bomber
Montgomery AeroplaneThe Santa Clara US Glider Experimental 1905 Prototype 1
Payen PA-22 France Propeller Experimental 1942 Prototype 1 Delta rear wing. Begun prewar.
Peyret Tandem France Glider Private 1922 Prototype 1 Won the 1922 British Glider Competition.
Peyret VI France Propeller Experimental 1933 Prototype 1 Forerunner of theSFCA Taupin.
Piel CP-10 Pinocchio France Propeller Private 1948 Prototype 1 Similar to theMignet Pou du Ciel.
QAC Quickie Q2series US Propeller Private 1980 Homebuilt Derivatives of theRutan Quickie.
Rutan Quickie US Propeller Private 1978 Homebuilt
Salmon Tandem Monoplane UK Propeller Private 1923 Prototype 1
Scaled Composites ATTT US Propeller Experimental 1986 Prototype 1
Scaled Composites Proteus US Jet Experimental 1998 Prototype 1 High-altitude endurance.
SFCA Taupin France Propeller Private 1936 Production 53
SFCA Lignel 44 France Propeller Private 1946 Prototype 1 4-seat development of the Taupin.
Viking Dragonfly US Propeller Private 1980 Homebuilt
Westland P.12 Lysander Delanne UK Propeller Utility 1940 Prototype 1 Modified Lysander to include rear wing and gun turret.

Tandem wings in nature

edit
Echinothrips americanusis only about 1 mm long.
The band-wing flying fishhas enlargedpectoralandpelvic fins.

Insects

edit

Several orders of flying insects employ tandem wings, each with its characteristicanatomyand flight modes.

Insectswith tandem flapping wings include theOdonata(dragonfliesanddamselflies),Lepidoptera(butterfliesandmoths) and some Thysanoptera orThrips.Odonata species typically have long, thin wings and can synchronise the flapping of fore and aft pairs in various different modes, allowing them to be both fast and highly manoeuvrable. By comparison the Lepidoptera have wider wings which are flapped in synchrony and may even overlap in flight, and are better suited to endurance flying. Thrips are smaller insects and the flying species have relatively stiff wings. Due to their small size, they generate lift viaclap and flingflapping rather than the usual leading-edge vortex generation of most insects.

Many flying beetles, such as theladybird,have forward wing cases which open out in flight but do not flap significantly. While on the ground they protect the delicate main, hind wings, while in the air they may be used to modify the aerodynamics of the flapping main wing.[12]

Flying fish

edit

Flying fishhave enlargedpectoral finsand are capable of gliding flight, though not of true flapping flight. Some species, such as the band-wing, also have sufficiently enlargedpelvic fins,further back along their bodies, to form a tandem layout.

Dinosaurs

edit

Microraptorwas a genus of tandem-wingeddinosaurs,possibly only a single species. It is known only from the fossil record, principally in China. Both fore and hind limbs were covered in flight feathers and it is thought to have been capable of true flapping flight as well as gliding. Its flight mode is not known.

See also

edit

References

edit

Citations

edit
  1. ^abcdefghBottomley (1977)
  2. ^Miles (1944)
  3. ^Green, William and Swanborough, Gordon;The Complete Book of Fighters,Salamander, 1994. p.31.
  4. ^abcPoulsen (1943)
  5. ^Henderson, William P. and Huffman, Jarrett K.;Aerodynamic characteristics of a tandem wing configuration of a Mach number of 0.30,NASA, October 1975.
  6. ^Wolkovitch, Julian; "The Joined Wing: An Overview",Journal of Aircraft,Published Online 22 May 2012.doi:10.2514/1.C036326
  7. ^Marcel, Arthur;The Ligeti Stratos,ultralightaircraftaustralia, 2024. (retrieved 13 May 2022).
  8. ^Brewer, Griffith (October 1921). "Aviation's Greatest Controversy".U.S. Air Services:9–17.
  9. ^Penrose, Harald; "Adventure with Fate", Airlife, 1984. pp.186-7.
  10. ^Penrose, Harald; "Adventure with Fate", Airlife, 1984. p.199.
  11. ^Gordon, Yefim and Gunston, Bill;Soviet X-Planes,Midland, 2000. pp.62-3.
  12. ^Geisler, Tomasz (2012); "Analysis of the Structure and Mechanism of Wing Folding and Flexion in Xylotupes Gideon Beetle (L. 1767) (Coloptera, Scarabaeditae)",Acta Mechanica et Automatica,Vol.6 No.3, 2012.

Bibliography

edit
  • Bottomley, J. W. (1977). "Tandem-Wing Aircraft",Aerospace,vol. 4, October 1977. pp. 12–20.
  • Miles, George H. (1944)."The Tandem Monoplane".Flight.27 April 1944. Archived fromthe original(pdf)on 2016-03-05.
  • Poulsen, C. M. (1943). "The Tandem Monoplane: Does it Still Have a Future? Some Past Experiences Recalled",Flight,12 August 1943, pp. 167–8. (Archive:Page 1Page 2)