Drutt

Old stuff moved toUser:Drutt/Archive

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol –Survey Invitation Hello Drutt! TheWMFis currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please clickHEREto take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please seeNPP Survey

Spy Basket - Paul Jaray

From where do you know it was Paul Jaray?[1],[2]I had nothing found about Juray or Jaray and antenna. And Lehmann wrote nothing about Jaray. It seems logical, because Jaray was for aerodynamic. But for Luftschiffbau (airship) he worked from 1915. (He had coud work as an externist from the airoplane company) Lehman tested his Butter churn und the Spy basket between 1914-12-14 (finish of LZ26 / ZXII) and 1915-01-19 (L24 / L3 & LZ27 / L4 bombing as the first the England coast. Lehman had waited to be the first, but had troubles with the ship to this time.) --Franz(Fg68at)de:Talk16:34, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Hallo, I did not write the original article but saw the reference to Jaray (or Juray) and linked it to him. I assumed it had to be him. A list of his patents ishere,but I don't see any reference to antenna gondolas.Drutt(talk)20:46, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Manchester Evening News/Manchester Evening Chronicle

Hi. As you seem to have created the redirect fromManchester Evening ChronicletoManchester Evening News,I thought you might like to see an issue raised atWikipedia:Reference_desk/Miscellaneous#Regional_Newspapers.Do we have any particular reason for the redirect, or was the Chronicle another newspaper entirely? If it was, the redirect seems misleading, and if there is a reason for the redirect, we should probably add something to the MEN article to explain why.AndyTheGrump(talk)03:12, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Never mind - the redirect seems to have been explained, in that the MEN took over the Chronicle in the 1960s.AndyTheGrump(talk)03:19, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletionofList of Japan Societies

The articleList of Japan Societieshas beenproposed for deletionbecause of the following concern:

WP:LINKFARM;anything that is notable enough to have an article is handled by categories.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}}notice, but please explain why in youredit summaryor onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}}will stop theproposed deletion process,but otherdeletion processesexist. In particular, thespeedy deletionprocess can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletionallows discussion to reachconsensusfor deletion. –Roscelese(talk⋅contribs)03:48, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Brian Gould

The articleBrian Gouldhas beenproposed for deletionbecause of the following concern:

Does not meetWP:GNG.No reliable secondary sources.WP:COIas well.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}}notice, but please explain why in youredit summaryor onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}}will stop theproposed deletion process,but otherdeletion processesexist. In particular, thespeedy deletionprocess can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletionallows discussion to reachconsensusfor deletion.Nikki♥31107:10, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Your contributed article,BAE Hawk 200

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using theArticle Wizardto help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page,BAE Hawk 200.First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page –BAE Systems Hawk.Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged forspeedy deletion.Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out atBAE Systems Hawk– you might like to discuss new information atthe article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you maycontest the nominationbyvisiting the pageand clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere.Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest thearticle creation processand using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.Shibbolethink^(♔♕)05:08, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election.TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process.It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statementsand submit your choices onthe voting page.For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery(talk)16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016:Voting now open!

Hello, Drutt. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee electionsis open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

TheArbitration Committeeis the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process.It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans,editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policydescribes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statementsand submit your choices onthe voting page.MediaWiki message delivery(talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination ofShrivingfor deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleShrivingis suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelinesor whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shrivinguntil a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.IazygesConsermonorOpus meum05:21, 18 March 2018 (UTC)