Noosphere

This user is proud to be a
Wikipedian.

This user is part of the
Welcoming Committee.

This user believes thatprocess is importanton Wikipedia and is opposed to its circumvention.

This user is opposed to onlinecensorship.

'	This user believes that onlyarticlesneed reflect aNPOV,and that displayingpolitical,religious,or other beliefs usinguserboxesanduser categoriesshouldnot be banned.

This user enjoyspainting.

WPC

This user will get around to being a member of the Wikipedian Procrastination Club

Non Commercial

This User is against commercials in Wikipedia.

Thisuseris arecent changes patroller.

Uni

This user is auniversitystudent.

'	This user is a member ofWikipedians against censorship.

Legalize

This user supports the legalization ofalldrugs.

This user supports the use ofwind powerandelectric vehicles.

This user is interested inrecyclingissues.

This user findscopyright paranoiadisruptive.

This user is old enough to remember what atypewriteris, and that's all you need to know.

OCaml

This user is anObjective Camlprogrammer.

C	This user can program inC.

perl

This user is aperl hacker.

vb	This user is aVisual Basicprogrammer.

bas

This user can program inBASIC.

bash

This user is abashscripter.

batch-1

This user is anoccasional Batchprogrammer.

re	This user is aregular expressionprogrammer.

AmE-n

This user is anativespeaker ofAmerican English.

sgn-1

This user can communicate at abasiclevel inASL.

es-1

Este usuario puede contribuir con un nivelbásicodeespañol.

nl-1

Deze gebruiker heeft eenbeginnende kennisvan hetNederlands.

ru-1

Этот участник владеетрусским языкомнаначальном уровне.

WikiProject Philosophytask list

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this projectis available. See alsothe tool's wiki pageandthe index of WikiProjects.

Optimismshould have a separate page that focuses on the philosophical idea of optimism and distinguishes the philosophical view from "positive thinking" and other everyday uses of the word.
Philosophy of social science,has some okay points but requires elaboration on Wittgenstein and Winch, perhaps other linguistic critiques, whether logical positivist or postmodernist.
Exchange valueneeds to be redone, it shouldn't be under 'Marxist theory'- although it's an important component of Marxist theory it's also vital for all economics. That said the article's weight on Marx is also absurd.
German Idealismand the articles related to it may need to be rewritten or expanded to avoidundue weightonArthur Schopenhauer.
Protected valuesfirst section confuses right action and values and needs a copy edit, moving and wikifying
Quality (philosophy)needs a more clear explanation.
Socratic dialoguescould do with some tidying and clarification. See the talk page for one suggested change.
Problem of universals:The introductory definition is (perhaps) fixed. But, the article is poor. Check out the German version.
Teleology:the article is shallow and inconsistent.
Existentialism:the quality of this article varies wildly and is in desperate need of expert attention.
Analytic philosophyThis is a very major topic, but still has several sections which are stubs, and several topics which are not covered.
LifeworldA philosophical concept that seems to have fallen exclusively into the hands of the sociologists. Could use some attention; it's a major and complex issue in phenomenology.
PerceptionNeeds the attention of philosophically minded Wikipedians. This is only the start of an overhaul of perception and related articles.

Honors

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar.For defending the place of the encyclopedia as an aggregator and disseminator of information (and not as an entity to be governed by moral laws), atWP:NOT EVILand elsewhere.Joe03:57, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
I hereby award you theBarnstar of Diligence,regardingthis piece of work.The Barnstar of Diligence Award is given to those individuals who have a harmonic combination of extraordinary scrutiny, precision and community service. (awarded byRyanFreisling)