This editor is a
Veteran Editor IV
and is entitled to display
this
GoldEditor Star.

Thinker78is a user, since late 2015, of amesopedianeditor ofWikipediawho started editing anonymously when the project came out in 2001. His first account wasUser:WonderingAngel-aesc78,but sadly he didn't continue editing with it and has since lost the password. He believes in doing an excellent job, fairness, rational and honest debate, admitting mistakes, and the necessity of giving explanations for one's actions. He doesn't likeargumentum ad verecundiam,abuse of authority, nor unduecensorship.

Among other things, he is an investigator,[a]a translator,[b]a formerunionofficial, anempath,asyncretistveg'n, and afree thinkingskeptic. In college he was one of the top students in classes of Logic, Math, and Statistics. At one of his jobs, he was one of the best among 1,000 employees and top of his division.[c]Since he was a kid he has felt passion for the written word and its analysis. Sometimes in his life outside of Wikipedia he gets threats of torture or death for unknown reasons.[d]Maybe he tries to be tooinsightful,open-minded, and vocal for his own good.

NPOV and objectivity

edit
Themis,the goddess ofJusticeinAncient Greece

Due to Thinker78's trying to beimpartial and unbiasedin his analysis and editing, sometimes editors tend to accuse him ironically of being partial and biased, more specially in controversial topics. This is because he tries to think and analyze independently, questioning what he thinks needs to be questioned and playing theDevil's advocate.

This, without trying to adopt, or make exception to his skepticism, the majority's position only because it is the majority's or popular position. This is not to say he won't adopt the majority or minority position if he thinks it is the proper thing to do based on logic and Wikipedia'sguidelines and policies.These two latter for some reason in his opinion seem to be often ignored in favor of a single page's status quo or editors' personal opinions.

Basic information

edit
Prometheusbeing tortured
Ifeelmeditative[1]
The person behind this user has been a registered user ofWikipediasince at least29 January 2008.
This user has been registered inWikipediasinceNovember 29, 2015.
This user has made over
20,000edits toWikipedia.
This user is one of the10,000most active English Wikipediansof all time.




ESU99.2%for major edits and99.5%for minor edits. – Last update: 30 July 2023.
blockThis user wasblocked,but is blocked no longer.

Skills

edit
Veritas, the goddess ofTruthinAncient Rome
es-
gt
-5
Este usuario puede contribuir con un nivelprofesionaldelespañol chapín.
en-5This user can contribute with aprofessionallevel ofEnglish.

-
This user is a translator from Spanish to English onWikipedia:Translation.
~(p&~p)This user studies the concept oflogic.

To do

edit

Regular actions

edit

Check daily:

  1. change online and mood statuses
  2. reset checklist
  3. watchlist
  4. tasks working on
  5. pending consensus
  6. pending other action
  7. planned tasks
  8. updated edits and bar
    1. change biweekly in thecalendsandides(last, 17 March 2024; next, 1 April 2024).
Daily activities check
Action Checked Done
Change status x x
watchlist x x
checked/updated edits and bar x 0
tasks working on x
pending consensus x e
pending other action x e
RFC x e
planned tasks x 0

Tasks in process

edit

These are some tasks I am currently working on, but not necessarily include all. Try adding no more than 3-5 at a time to avoid a long list.

Time sensitive

edit

Discussions and RFC
edit

Inrequests for comments,be concise, understandable, and provide option A and B if applicable. Before ending it, post about theconsensusyou think was reached, maybe pinging all editors who contributed. Follow "Pending consensus" procedure.

  • EMPTY
Categories for Discussion
edit
  • EMPTY
Other
edit
  • EMPTY

Not time sensitive

edit

Discussions and RFC
edit
  • EMPTY
Other
edit

Pending

edit
  • EMPTY

Pending consensus

edit

Implement changes after 7 days if there is consensus. After 7 days, if there is no editors' input in the relevant talk page thread and no sign of opposition to my latest entry, post a notice that change will be implemented in 7 days, perWP:IMPLICITCONSENSUS.[e]But remember, perWP:TALKDONTREVERT,"Consensus cannot always be assumed simply because editors stop responding to talk page discussions in which they have already participated."

  • EMPTY

Pending other action

edit

Tasks to do pending other action.

  • EMPTY

Planned tasks

edit

If you are a visitor in my profile page, you are most than welcome performing these tasks.

2019-2021

edit

January to June 2022

edit
  • Request inclusion of Wikiprojects in welcome templates to have more specialized support from new editors. 19:33, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Add persecution section to articleJainism.17:19, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

July - December 2022

edit
  • Open thread in relevant talk page to discuss adding guideline or information page advising that articles about politicians should have certain sections and information. 15:34, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Discuss in relevant venue whetherWikipedia:Closing discussionsapplies also to regular talk page discussions, perclosure challenge.00:00, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Cerebellum.17:14, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Open a discussion in relevant talk page about process of closing regular talk page discussions. 23:16, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Add example forMOS:PRONPLACEMENT15:35, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Work on articleYin and yang19:42, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
  • Analyze if there is correlation betweenCOI edit requestlength and time in queue. 9 Nov 2022
  • Ask about adding info about Elliot interview inRoosevelt.29 Nov 2022

January - June 2023

edit
  • EMPTY

July - December 2023

edit

January - June 2024

edit

Tasks done

edit

These tasks only reflect some edits I planned on doing for later, which may be just a fraction of my total edits overall.

Extended content

DoneCleanupRicardo Quiñónez LemusFinished 16:44, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

DoneComment in controversy of talk page ofRape in Islamic law

DoneAdd info of danger of high dose ofvitamin c16:33, 4 August 2021 (UTC) Finished 19:50, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

DoneCustomize my signature 16:41, 23 August 2021 (UTC) Finished by 19 June 2022 (UTC)

DoneMove draft by coi editor. 05:31, 14 October 2021 (UTC) Finished 03:45, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
DoneWork onMOS:LEADSENTENCEto fix cluttering in example. 18:04, 4 January 2022 (UTC) Finished 02:40, 25 January 2022 (UTC) reverted. Done2 16:48, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

DoneWork on lead sentence ofVaccination policy.17:30, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

DoneDiscuss Donald Trump articleparagraphstalk page section. 18:56, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
DoneAdd page history toMarquisate of Villenaredirect and check my original page creation. 17:40, 21 June 2022 (UTC) Finished 23 June 2022

DoneAdd kb and words columns to table inMOS:LEADLENGTH(under the heading article length). 18:16, 8 June 2022 (UTC) Scheduled to implement on 27 June 2022. Done 27 June 2022.

DoneChallenge in the proper venue the closure by Specifico of the"Political legacies"thread in the talk page of Donald Trump. 17:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC) Done 1 July 2022

DoneFinishmodifying instructionsin How to copyedit page of the Guild. 21:18, 26 June 2022 (UTC) Implement on 2 July 2022. Done on 3 July 2022

DoneContact administrator for advice regarding noticeboard "Political legacies"closure challenge.17:19, 3 July 2022 (UTC) Do on 6 July 2022. Done on 6 July 2022

DoneWork on lede ofNancy Pelosi.Done 8 July 2022

DoneWork on lead sentence ofNicholas I.18:10, 4 January 2022 (UTC) Done 10 July 2022

Not doneDiscuss birth issue on lede ofElizabeth II18:55, 16 April 2020 (UTC) Not done 10 July 2022

DoneCheck resolution of "Political legacies"closure challenge.19:41, 6 July 2022 (UTC) Done 20 July 2022

DoneDiscussion in thread titled,Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Lead section#In a long lead, is it good practice for the first, short para to be a summary of the rest?21 July 2022

DoneAnalyze discussion about change inWikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Lead section#Seeking consensus for table modification.21:17, 5 July 2022 (UTC) Done 20:05, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

DoneCreate page for Guatemala's Supreme Court PresidentSilvia Valdés.17:44, 21 June 2022 (UTC) Done 31 July 2022

DoneCopyedit first sentence ofJimmy Savile sexual abuse scandal.16:54, 14 February 2022 (UTC) Done 3 August 2022

DoneWork on lead ofHaakon, Crown Prince of Norway,including reducing number of paragraphs. 21:54, 29 June 2022 (UTC) Done 5 August 2022

DoneArchive my talk page. 5 August 2022. Done 5 August 2022

Not done(better focus on consensus).New page reviewer.18:11, 2 July 2022 (UTC) 10 Aug 2022

DoneWikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:MOS:LEADLENGTH table modification.12 Aug 2022

DoneWikipedia talk:WikiProject Wikipedia essaysProposal to change the scale 02:34, 8 August 2022 (UTC) Check activity of author, to post on talk page.

DoneTalk:Louis X of France#First sentence12 Aug 2022. Check RFC

DoneRemoval of my rfc publicizing from noticeboard15 Aug 2022

DoneTemplate talk:Leadcite comment23 Aug 2022

Not done(lack of time)Draft talk:Lauryn Evarts Bosstick22 Aug 2022 (analyze notability)

DoneTalk:Jimmy Savile sexual abuse scandal#The current first sentence is irrelevant13 Aug 2022 - 8 Sep 22

DoneWork onMarc Dutroux16:19, 6 December 2019 (UTC) - 14 Sep 2022

DoneWork onWikipedia:Manual of Style/Abbreviations#Latin abbreviations15 Sep 2022

Not done(maybe not enough references)User:Thinker78/Pedro Perebal12 Aug 2022 - 18 Sep 2022

DoneRfC: A TikToker, associates, other accused constitute 'Public figure' or not?

DoneHow to create a numbered list without indent?25 Oct 2022

DoneSuggest change in lead sentence ofWorld War 1.9 Nov 2022

DoneAppeal of removal of discussion11 Nov 2022

DoneTalk:Tudor Dixon19 Nov 2022 done 7 Dec 2022

DoneCopyedit first sentence Guatemalan Revolution17 Nov 2022 done 29 Nov 2022

DoneTalk:World War I17 Nov 2022 Done on 16 Dec 2022

DoneTalk:Rupert Sheldrake#Positions in institutions in lead should be modified19 Nov 2022 Done 29 Dec 2022

DoneA MOS:ALTNAME subsection duplicates function of MOS:LEADLANG5 Jan 2023 Done 8 Jan 2022

DoneWikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Revert24 January 2023 (original) Implemented 10 February 2023

DoneTalk:Dependent territory#UN list of dependent territories9 Feb 2023 - 16 Feb 2023

DoneWork onMOS:REDUNDANCYnote. 14 Apr 2023 - 15 Apr 2023

DoneAchieving neutrality tweak10 Nov 22 - 12 May 2023

DoneCategorizeassassinated politiciansby time. 25 Mar 2023 - 17 may 2023

DoneExcessive clutter of Gaddafi example11 May 2023 - 22 May 2023

DoneCreate the article Eunice Dwumfour. 22 Mar 2023 - 27 May 2023

DoneWikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 May 27#Category:Assassinated politicians in the Americas17 May 2023 - 7 June 2023

DoneFollow up on revert atTalk:COVID-19 lab leak theory- 3 Aug 2023 - 8 Aug 2023

DoneFollow up onWikipedia talk:Edit requests#Appealing a rejection- 12 July 2023 - 9 Aug 2023

DoneFollow up onAbdel Aziz al-Rantisireferences. 15 Aug 2023

DoneDiscuss modifying the first sentence ofOxford English Dictionary- 15 June 2023 - 15 Aug 2023

DoneCloseWikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 381#Is NewsGuard reliable for checking accuracy of news sites?25 Aug 2023

DoneCreate the articleAna Catalina Soberanis.2 May 2023 - 6 Sep 2023

DoneAdd first women presidents toCategory:Women's firsts- 17 Sep 2023 - 4 Oct 2023

DoneCreate page for Guatemala's Supreme Court PresidentBeatriz de León.02:55, 1 Aug 2022 - 21 Dec 2023

Discussions

edit

Categories for discussion

edit

DoneMake map ofPeténand its neighbors - 14 March 2024 - 15 March 2024

Templates

edit

Page and talk

edit
  • Footnote (pron is short of pronunciation)
    • {{#tag:ref|Pronounced variously {{IPAc-en|ˈ|ɡ|r|ɛ|n|ɪ|tʃ}} {{respell|GREN|itch}}, {{IPAc-en|ˈ|ɡ|r|ɛ|n|ɪ|dʒ}} {{respell|GREN|ij}}.<ref name=ahd/>|group=pron}}
      • Add <references group=pron/> or {{reflist|group=pron}} to Notes section (substitute pron with relevant text).
      • Remove<ref name=ahd/>if the reference is not going to be used elsewhere. If included and there is no such named reference an error will appear about an invoked ref not defined.
  • Wikitext citation:
    • <ref>{{Cite web|url= |title= |last= |first= |date= |website= |publisher= |access-date= |quote=}}</ref>
or
  • <ref name= "name" >{{Cite web|url= |title= |last= |first= |date= |website= |publisher= |access-date= |quote=}}</ref>
  • To invoke the named footnote:
  • <ref name= "name" />

Page

edit

Talk

edit

Categories

edit

More templates

edit
edit
  • Permanent link:
    • [[Special:Permalink/402359171]]
      • Forhttps://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&oldid=402359171

Issues and discussions

edit

Wikipedia philosophy and learning

edit
This user findscensorshipoffensive.
This user believes that edits need
This user tries to do the right thing. If they make a mistake, pleaselet them know.
<ref>This user recognizes the importance ofciting sources.
This user believes that new editors who commit vandalism should be treated with love, patience, tolerance and understanding.
This user believes that an editor should be humble, and weigh arguments by their rationality and not solely by the seniority of the other editor.
This user thinks it is a sad day when an editor, specially an administrator, doesn't want to seek consensus and unreasonably refuses to provide verifiable evidence of what they say.
This user realizes that a single short edit can take an hour or more of work
This editor has learned not to copy edit unsourced information.
This user realizes that it can take eight hours of work to copyedit a short article of 2000 words.
This editor has learned to read article's tags before copyediting.
This user has discovered that some contributors have been Wikipedia editors for more than ten years with thousands of edits, and they still useunreliable sources...
This editor has learned that a single revert may beedit warring.
This user has learned to have in mind specific examples before making proposals to modify policies or guidelines.
This user pledges to return to
Old-fashioned Wikipedian values.
This user has scored 189 in theWikipediholic test.

Opinion about administrators

edit

Administrators are users who volunteer their time and who go beyond what a regular editor does. For that alone they deserve praise. But as any person imbued with authority, some administrators act in undesirable ways. For example, they may display the badge when there is absolutely no need to, specially when doing regular edits as any other editor. They may feel entitled to not be pointed out Wikipedia guidance by regular editors and may get annoyed, offended, or angered when an editor dares to do so, or worse if a regular editor dares to criticize them.

They may take unfair adverse actions against editors who they don't like or who criticized them or a fellow administrator, when the context permits it (like denying certain rights or permissions). And they may cover for each other just like police departments do. In some situations, even non-administrators may pile on editors who commit the sin of pointing out policies or guidelines to an administrator, like if they know it all, are above rules and can't make mistakes.

After all, administrators and the Wikipedia community are people too, and as people they have the same qualities and defects as society at large.

Consensus vs no consensus

edit

Consensusin a discussion is the agreement or support of a proposal by at least a majority of participants who provided non-repeated reasonable arguments. This ideally reflecting objectively more weight of said arguments, which provides proper basis for a consensus decision.

No consensusoccurs when there is an unclear balance in the weight of reasons regarding an action in agood faith discussion.

Good advice from an administrator

edit

Sometimes, people just disagree. There is no one, singular Right® way, it is a matter of editorial preference. If you find that the majority disagree with you, you just accept it and move on. It doesn't matter that you disagree or why. Plenty of times I disagree with the consensus/majority, but it is just my life experience, my viewpoint, the way I learned to use the English language. Not everyone has the same background or preferences. Once it is clear that you are in the minority, it is best to just thank them for participating, and bow out. Everyone is on minority side of consensus from time to time.If I could offer some advice, it would be to work on being more concise. People are more willing to consider your perspective when you only use one or two paragraphs andkeep it simple.Quoting policy or MOS doesn't really help; people like what they like. So present the before and after, and keep the "why I like this" down to a sentence or two, in plain English. Then they are more likely to read everything you wrote, rather than gloss over the extended reasoning and form an opinion prematurely. The point by point edits did you no favors. It is also more effective to say why your way isbetter,rather than focus on why the other way iswrong.Positivity often rules the day.Dennis Brown-18:15, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

The status quo sometimes is wrong

edit

For a long time, years in fact, the pageJimmy Savile sexual abuse scandalhad asstatus quoa first sentence that didn't reflect guidance ofMOS:FIRST.It was more fit for the biographical page ofJimmy Savileand inappropriate for the article at hand because it didn't even mention the main topic, the scandal. When I changed it to follow the guideline,I was reverted.I posted in the talk pageabout my rationalebut there was no input.

I proceeded to summon editors from the community at large in aWikipedia:Requests for comment,which hada lot of input.The immediate and final consensus agreed with me, that the page had an inappropriate first sentence.

I didn't do something important: seekconsensusto officially end the discussion and implement the change. This is recommended to be done even if it's your own rfc and the consensus about the change seems evident. This reduces the risk of outrage andincivility.

The moral of the story is that sometimes the status quo needs to be challenged, but challenged properly.

First female governor in the Americas was from Guatemala

edit
Beatriz de la Cueva, governor of Guatemala

I learned thatBeatriz de la Cuevawas the first female governor in North America and all the Americas. She was born in Spain and was governor of theCaptaincy General of Guatemala.Apparently, reading theList of first women governors and chief ministers,there was no other female governor in the Americas, for almost 400 years.

Talk page guidance

edit

Arbitration principles

edit

Policies

edit

Guidelines

edit

Enforced essays

edit

Other essays

edit

New words learned in Wikipedia

edit

Betoken: To give evidence of.[4] [f]21:52, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Bowdlerizationor expurgation: Form ofcensorshipthat involves purging anything deemed noxious or offensive from an artistic work, or other type of writing or media. 22:04, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Guillemet:Pair of punctuation marks in the form of sideways doublechevrons,«and»,used asquotation marksin a number of languages. 22:26, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Grognard:Veteran and most prestigious elements of Napoleon's Imperial Guard and Army.

Metonymy:Figure of speechin which a concept is referred to by the name of something closely associated with it.

Mirabilia:Plural of mirabile. Marvels or wonders.

Synecdoche:Metonymyin which a term for a part of something is used to refer to the whole.

Gadfly:Person who interferes with the status quo of a society or community by posing novel, potentially upsetting questions.

Etymon:Earlier origin word of another one (plural: etyma).

Metathesis:Transposition of sounds or syllables in a word, or of words in a sentence.

Panegyric:Formal public speech or written verse, delivered in high praise.

Psychopomp:Entity believed to escort deceased souls to an afterlife. 8 Feb 2023

Argufy:To argue without any aim. 29 March 2023

Deracinate:Uproot people. 29 March 2023

Ides:Middle of the month in the Roman calendar. 26 April 2023

Therianthropy:Mythological capacity toshapeshift.

General philosophy

edit
VThis user isvegan.Share the compassion!
This user is anantinatalist,who believes people should choose not to have children.
This user may be an antinatalist, but he strongly believes people should have the right to have the number of children they want.
This user is askeptic,who believes a true skeptic questions everything, not justminority views.
This user is afreethinker,but mainly a
free thinker.
DEATHThis Wikipedian thinks that one strong possibility is thatthere is nothing after death.Although one never knows.
According to thePolitical compass,this user isEconomic Left (−4.13)andSocial Libertarian (−5.74).
This editor is anagnosticwho nevertheless beseeches supreme entities of Good and Justice.
Saint Francis of Assisiin penance

Memberships and roles

edit
This user is a participant in theRoyalty and Nobility task force.
This user is a member ofWikiproject Religion.What's thetruth?


This user is a member of theWelcoming Committeeof Wikipedia!
This user is a participant in
WikiProject Guatemala.
This user is a member of
WikiProject Maps
Map Workshop(watch)

More wikiprojects

edit
This user volunteers at the
Wikipedia Help Desk.
This user is a member of theWikiProject Unreferenced articles.
This user participates in
WikiProject User Warnings.
This user is a member of
WikiProject Cleanup.
This user is a member of
theGuild of Copy Editors.
Is human.This user is a participant in theGrammar WikiProject.
This experienced editor is seeking toadoptnew users.(Usersrequesting adoption)


This user is a participant in
WikiProject Latin America.
This user is amemberof theMontgomery task force.


This user is aWikipedia tipster.
This user is a member of theKindness Campaign.
This user is a member of
WikiProject Veganism
and Vegetarianism
.
This user is a member ofWikipedians against censorship.
This user is a member of theBirthday Committee!

Special forums or talk entries

edit

Talk pages, administrators' noticeboard, arbitration, other forum.

Milestones and deeds

edit
Don Pelayo de Asturias
This editor is aRegistered Editorand is entitled to display thisService Badge.
This editor is aSignatorand is entitled to display thisScroll of Signatures.
This user hasautoconfirmedrights on theEnglish Wikipedia.(verify)
This user hasextended confirmedrights on theEnglish Wikipedia.(verify)
This editor is aVeteran Editor IVand is entitled to display thisGoldEditor Star.
On July 2018, this editor realized he had enough pages in the watchlist and started unwatching pages.

Service progress

edit
On 20 February 2023, this user reached 8,000 edits.
On 6 June 2023 this user reached 10,000 edits, with the articlePaul Doumer.

Update biweekly in thecalendsandides(last updated 3 March 2024; next, 15 March 2024).

Currently, this editor has earned theVeteran Editor IVservice award.

To get to the next level,Senior Editor,he needs to meet theeditingrequirement.
Progress towards the next level (by edits): [403/ 4000 ]

10.1%completed

Wikiawards

edit
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Hey there! This is for how nice you were on my page to such a newbie. Good on ya!Rexlikescheese(talk) 22:47, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
The Copyeditor's Barnstar
For cleaning upDhvani Desai.Keep contributing.:)Nizil(talk) 04:39, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
The Modest Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded toThinker78for copy edits totaling over 4,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during theGOCE September 2018 Backlog Elimination Drive.Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions!Miniapolis20:17, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
The Civility Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to Thinker78 for his calm under pressure and noble work on wikipedia. Keep up the good work sir!May1787(talk) 01:10, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar
I have a great appreciation for editors who can put their biases aside. It should be applauded any time it's recognized. Keep up the good work.Nemov(talk) 19:56, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Articles created or translated

edit

First sentences edited

edit

Guidance

edit

Others

edit

Timekeeping

edit
  • It took me almost 12 hours throughout a week to work 22 edits or 246 words of "readable prose size" of the article1990s—on average, about 2 edits per hour, half an hour (0.5h) per edit (including research), or 20 words per hour, 3 minutes per word. 22 April 2022
  • It can take me 2 hours of analysis to reply to a talk page post.

Challenges

edit

June 22, 2018:Transclusion.InTalk:Noah's Ark#Myth vs account or story controversy,it took me more than two and a half hours to figure out how to properly format it, given that initially text was just copied from thehelp deskto the talk page ofNoah's Ark.Initially I was just looking at which way was more proper to indicate that text was "moved". I thought abouthatnotes,but I spent a long time analyzing the guideline to see if it was proper use. I figured out that I could use atransclusion hatnote.But soon I got embroiled in finding a way to indicate which text was actually moved, because a new discussion was started. I found outabout boxes.But then I realized I would have to actually transclude the text. Which I finally managed to do,transcluding the text.Yay!

Hall of fame

edit

In memoriam

edit

User:Ed,reportedly a 14 year-old editor with thousands of edits, founder ofWikipedia:Esperanza,WikiProject International relations,WikiProject Lists.Inspiring!

Longest threads I have walked in

edit
  1. Edit dif 1104699210and its related RfC: A TikToker, associates, other accused constitute 'Public figure' or not? ByUser:Bookku.More than 14,500 words. Update: 1,800 more words! WithUser:USaamoin continuance of the saga! (15 Oct 22).
  2. A mountain out of molehill?By45.136.197.235and mention ofSideswipe9thandSoftlemonades.Around 7,000 words.

Interesting images

edit

Funny!

edit

Warnings

edit
Psychological stress
This editor has learned from personal experience that controversies in Wikipedia can lead to high levels of stress which can cause in turn severe adverse health effects. This is no different from controversies at work or in other settings although probably less severe because you can always step away from Wikipedia for as long as you want, something you cannot always do at work.
French military intelligence duress
This editor has learned that the French military intelligence coerced with judiciary threats a Wikipedia editor into deleting thePierre-sur-Haute military radio stationarticle from the French Wikipedia.[6]
Saudi Arabia sentenced Wikipedians to years in prison
This editor has learned that the Saudi government sentenced two editors for adding content “deemed to be critical about the persecution of political activists in the country.”[7]

Historical

edit

Ignorance and murderous savagery

edit

Contemporary accounts state Mongol soldiers looted and then destroyed mosques, palaces, libraries, and hospitals. Priceless books from Baghdad's thirty-six public libraries were torn apart, the looters using their leather covers as sandals.[8]Grand buildings that had been the work of generations were burned to the ground. TheHouse of Wisdom(the Grand Library of Baghdad), containing countless precious historical documents and books on subjects ranging from medicine to astronomy, was destroyed. Claims have been made that the Tigris ran red from the blood of the scientists and philosophers killed.[9][10]Citizens attempted to flee, but were intercepted by Mongol soldiers who killed in abundance, sparing no one, not even children.

Notes

edit
  1. ^Non-government investigator, not a university-educated scientist, not a private investigator in the mainstream concept (https://web.archive.org/web/20200430051544/https:// vocabulary /dictionary/investigator).
  2. ^By training but not certified (didn't do the exam)
  3. ^Even though constantly in conflict and at loggerheads with management due to his union position and duties, management itself recognized his work as one of the best in the organization. Following the status quo sometimes leads to usual and mediocre outcomes. Innovation and controversy is sometimes a most to improve things.
  4. ^An example: A random stranger on the street approached him and chitchats. Eventually the stranger told him to think things before getting left without skin.
  5. ^"An edit has presumed consensus until it is disputed or reverted. Should another editor revise that edit then the new edit will have presumed consensus until it meets with disagreement."
  6. ^Infinitive: to betoken, preterite: betokened, past participle: betokened[5]

References

edit
  1. ^|https://music.youtube /watch?v=qDgLy1HtviU&list=OLAK5uy_mQBNroOc13yhkaCSMobdJebtiTUeljVeQ
  2. ^http:// baltimoresun /news/opinion/oped/bs-ed-op-1009-foreign-aid-20171005-story.html
  3. ^https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#FOP_guatemala_is_all_wrong%2C_part_2
  4. ^https:// merriam-webster /dictionary/betoken
  5. ^https://conjugator.reverso.net/conjugation-english-verb-betoken.html
  6. ^https://arstechnica /tech-policy/2013/04/wikipedia-editor-allegedly-forced-by-french-intelligence-to-delete-classified-entry/
  7. ^Belanger, Ashley (6 Jan 2023)."Wikipedia admin jailed for 32 years after alleged Saudi spy infiltration".Ars Technica.Retrieved8 Jan2023.
  8. ^Murray, S.A.P. (2012). The library: An illustrated history. New York: Skyhorse Publishing, pp. 54.
  9. ^Frazier, I., "Invaders: Destroying Baghdad,"New Yorker Magazine,[Special edition: Annals of History], April 25, 2005,Online IssueArchived2018-06-12 at theWayback Machine
  10. ^Szczepanski, Kallie. "How the Mongols Took Over Baghdad in 1258." ThoughtCo. https:// thoughtco /the-mongol-siege-of-baghdad-1258-195801 (accessed February 10, 2021).
edit

Relevant categories

edit