TheYurokpeople are anAlgic-speakingIndigenous people of Californiathat has existed along theHehlkeek 'We-Royor "Health-kick-wer-roy"[needs IPA](now known as theKlamath River) and on thePacific coast,fromTrinidadsouth of the river[which?]’s mouth almost toCrescent Cityalong the north coast.[2][3]

Yurok
'O'loolekweesh 'o'l/'Oolekwoh
Yurok man and canoe on theTrinity RiverbyEdward S. Curtis,c. 1923
Total population
6,567 alone and in combination[1](2010)
Regions with significant populations
United States(California)
Languages
English,Yurok[2]
Religion
traditional tribal religion,Christianity
Related ethnic groups
Wiyot[2]

The people of the Yurok Tribe traditionally identify asOohl,a Yurok word simply meaning “the people.”[4]Some historic documents, like the Yurok Tribe’s unratified treaty with the Government of the United States (GoUS), refer to the Yurok Tribe as theLower Klamath,Pulikla,orPoh-likIndians[5][6]to distinguish the people of the Yurok Tribe from the “Upper Klamath” or “Peh-tsick” Indians, who are now known as the Karuk Tribe.[7]The nameYurokis derived from theKarukwordyúruk va’áraaras,meaning "downriver people; i.e. Yurok Indians".[8][9]American ethnologistGeorge Gibbsfirst recorded the term as 'Yourrk' while traveling withCol. Redick McKeein 1851, and mistakenly used it as the name of the tribe in his book,Observations on the Indians of the Klamath River and Humboldt Bay, Accompanying Vocabularies of Their Languages,published in 1887. These names all developed from the way the river was, and still is, centered in the worldview of the people of the Yurok Tribe. Traditionally, the people of the Yurok Tribe would refer to villages down river asPue-lik-lo'(meaning 'Down River Indian'), villages upriver asPey-cheek-lo'(meaning 'Up River Indian'), and villages on the Pacific coast asNer-'er-ner'(meaning “Coast Indian” ). However, all these terms were merely practical descriptions of how to get to or from a village location within the Ancestral Land of the Yurok Tribe; thePue-lik-lo',Pey-cheek-lo'andNer-'er-ner'were, and are, all stillOohl.

The Yurok people live primarily within the exterior boundaries ofYurok Reservationand surrounding communities inHumboldt,Del NorteandTrinitycounties. Although the reservation comprises some 56,000 acres (23,000 ha) of contiguous land along the Klamath River, only about 5,000 acres (2,000 ha) of scattered plots are under partial tribal ownership. Most Yurok land is owned bytimber corporationsor is part of national parks and forests.[10]Thisforest managementhas significantly disempowered the Yurok people and disrupted their ability to access natural resources, land, and practice Indigenous lifeways.[11]

Etymology

edit

The Yurok refer to themselves as 'Oohl( "person" ) or'O'loolekweesh 'o'l / 'Oolekwoh(lit. "'o'loolekw [=" village "] dwellers" ).Ner'ernerh / Nert'ernerh( "Coast people, i.e. Coast Yurok" ) refers to Yurok on the coast andHehlkeeklaa( "Klamath River people, i.e. Klamath River Yurok" ) refers to Yurok who live along the Klamath River.Pueleeklaa / Pueleekla'orPuelekuekla' / Puelekueklaa'( "down river/downstream people, i.e. River Yurok" ) is used to distinguish themselves from the upriver (Klamath River) livingKaruk(Pecheeklaa / Pecheekla= "up river/upstream people, i.e. Karuk people" ).Saa'agoch' / Saa'agochehl( "Yurok language") is one of twoAlgic languagesspoken in California, the other beingWiyot(therefore they are culturally similar to theWiyot people) and is currently undergoing a successful revitalization effort.[12]

History

edit
Traditional territory of the Yurok

The Yurok have been living along theKlamath Riverfor 10,000 years, with a lifestyle closely linked to the once abundant salmon.[13]Some of their villages date back to the 14th century.[14]

There are descriptions of some contact being made with Californian Indians as far back as June 1579 byFrancis Drakeand the crew of theGolden Hind.[15]Fur traders and trappers from theHudson's Bay Companycame in 1827.[14]Following encounters with white settlers moving into their aboriginal lands during agold rushin 1850, the Yurok were faced with disease and massacres that reduced their population by 75%.[16]In 1855, following theKlamath and Salmon River War,the Lower Klamath River Indian Reservation was created by executive order. The reservation boundaries included a portion of the Yurok's territory and some Yurok villages.

Contemporary

edit

TheHoopa-Yurok Settlement Actof 1988,[17]an acted passed by the 2nd Session of the 100th Congress of 1988, declared that Yurok descendants who have chosen to remain members of recognized tribes other than the Yurok Tribe of theYurok Reservation- primarily theResighini Rancheria,but also theCher-Ae Heights Indian Community of the Trinidad RancheriaandBig Lagoon Rancheria- "shall no longer have any right or interest whatsoever in the tribal, communal, or unallotted land, property, resources, or rights within, or appertaining to, the Yurok Indian Reservation or the Yurok Tribe."[18]TheResighini Rancheriaattempted to challenge the Hoopa-Yurok Settlement Act in 1992 case Shermoen v. United States, 982 F.2d 1312, 1314 (9th Cir. 1992), but the court ruling in the case found that "In the Hoopa-Yurok Settlement Act, Congress sought to resolve the legal conflicts by: (1) partitioning the reservation into two reservations, designating the Square as the" Hoopa Valley Reservation "and the Extension as the" Yurok Reservation, "25 U.S.C. § 1300i-1; (2) distributing the escrow funds, 25 U.S.C. § 1300i-33; (3) confirming the statutes of the Hoopa Valley Tribe, and designating the Square or Hoopa Valley Reservation as the reservation to be held in trust for the Hoopa Valley Tribe, 25 U.S.C. § 1300i-1(b) 7; (4) recognizing and organizing the Yurok Tribe, and designating the Addition or Yurok Reservation as the reservation to be held in trust for the Yurok Tribe, 25 U.S.C. § 1300i-1(c) 8." Shermoen v. U.S., 982 F.2d 1312, 1316 (9th Cir. 1992)[19]

Mouth of the Klamath River at the Pacific Ocean

Fishing, hunting, and gathering remain important to tribal members.Basket weavingand woodcarving are important arts. A traditional hamlet of wooden plank buildings, called Sumeg, was built in 1990. The Jump Dance and Brush Dance remain part of tribal ceremonies.[20]The tribe's involvement in condor reintroduction, along withtraditional burning,environmental restoration,wildfire preparedness, the drought, and juvenile fish kill, was discussed with GovernorGavin Newsomwhen he visited in June 2021.[21]

The tribe owns and operates a casino, river jet boat tours and other tourist attractions.[22]The Yurok Tribe Construction Corporation has several projects that it is taking part in at the moment, including Orick Mill, Coffee Creek, Heliwood, Oregon Gulch and Condor Aviation.[23]In 2023, the construction company carved out new channels for theChinook salmonalong theSacramento River.They introduced vegetation into the channels to act as cover for juvenile salmon to hide in.[24]

Environment

edit

Carbon sequestration

edit

Through oral tradition and archaeological records, it is estimated that the Yurok lands were originally some half-a-million acres.[25]In 1855 they were confined to a reservation of around 90,000 acres: by 1993, this had declined to around 5% of the original reservation.[25]Carbon sequestrationhas enabled the Yurok to own approximately 100,000 acres by 2021.[26] Because of this effort, the Yurok have been awarded theEquator Prizeby theUnited Nations Development Program.[26]Using the cap-and-trade scheme, theCalifornia Air Resources Board(CARB) issues one offset credit ($12) for each metric ton the Yurok can prove its forests have sequestered.[25]

After starting negotiations in 2010, the Yurok have paid off loans, supported schools, youth programming, housing, road improvement and off-reservation businesses through carbon sequestration.[26]Land reclamation using the cap-in-trade revenue has allowed them to take control of land management and to sustainably harvest timber. Tribal Vice Chairman Frankie Myers said: "the most beneficial thing we're doing with our land is giving members access to it".[26]Through working with companies and organisations such as New Forests andThe Trust for Public Land,the Yurok will employ a blend ofTraditional Ecological Knowledgeand western science to re-create the environmental conditions that existed in this region.[27]

The participation by the Yurok in the scheme has been met with concerns and criticism.[25]"I'm not happy with it" said Jene McCovey, a tribal elder. "It's not viable. It allows polluters to pollute".[25]Tribal member Marty Lamebear agreed that the carbon project had brought in money but said: "They buy our air, so they can, you know, pollute theirs."[25]Angela Adrar, the executive director ofClimate Justice Alliance,said: "The Yurok should have their land regardless of some program... The fact that they have to sell their forest to get back their land seems really backwards."[25]

Wind power

edit

In February 2024, the Yurok had its first Tribal Offshore Wind Summit to help native communities gain more understanding aboutoffshore wind powerand how the ever-growing clean energy developments could impact on the food, culture and income for Native communities.[28]A central point emerged from the Summit that there could not be responsible offshore wind development "in tribal areas without tribal consent" and that tribal leaders were concerned about their role in the decision making process.[28]A major topic of conversation were the twoHumboldtareawind farmsand how the industrialization involved might impact the local ports and surrounding areas. Robert Hemstead, vice-chairman for theTrinidad Rancheriasaid that people from the tribes had come together "to move forward in a good way on renewable energy".[28]Yurok Chairman Joseph L. James said that the tribes did not want to see other industries "take advantage of our natural resources and contribute little or nothing to the local community."[28]

In 2023, Frankie Myers of the Yurok tribe wrote that sincecolonizationbegan, natural resource extraction had devestated indigenous communities.[29]This has led to a great mistrust of industry, so that when the offshore wind industry tells people about the great opportunities it will bring, native peoples remain sceptical.[29]Further, during Yurok sacred ceremonies, mountain peaks are often used "which offer an unobstructed view of the ocean" and some of the last places that they can see the world as their ancestors had seen it.[29]Yet the Yurok, traditional managers of their localecosystem,had a lack of outreach from the corporations involved. In the future, tribal nations may decide to support offshore wind development, but that they "must be in leadership positions through every phase of the process".[29]While offshore wind can help provide the clean energy America needs, unless the industry "truly engages with the Native American tribes that suffered the impacts from previous natural resource extraction, it will be as dirty as the rest of them."[29]

On 6 March 2024, the Yurok Tribal Council voted to oppose offshore wind developments near the Yurok Coast.[30][31]The Council gave several reasons on their Facebook page for this stance:[30]

  • "The 900-foot-tall offshore wind turbines will indelibly tarnish sacred cultural sites from the coast to the high country."[30]
  • "There is insufficient scientific research on the adverse environmental impacts associated with the massive floating wind turbines and platforms. The Tribe is gravely concerned about potential risks to the interlinked ecosystem extending from the deep ocean to the headwaters of the Klamath River."[30]
  • "The federal government has not recognized the Yurok Tribe’s unceded ocean territory or its sovereign authority to determine whether and how this territory should be developed."[30]

The Yurok join theBear River Bandand theTolowa Dee-ni' Nationin its opposition.[31]

Forestry

edit

On March 20, 2024, the Yurok began a first-of-its-kind land deal to manage tribal lands with theNational Park Serviceunder a memorandum of understanding between the tribe,Save the Redwoods LeagueandRedwood National and State Parks.[32][33]Sam Hodder, president and CEO of Save the Redwoods League, explained that the agreement would be starting a process of changing the present narrative about who, and for whom, natural lands are managed.[34]The return of the 125 acres - named 'O Rew by the Yurok - demonstrates "the sheer will and perseverance of the Yurok people".[34]Joseph L. James, Yurok chairman, said: "Together, we are creating a new conservation model that recognizes the value of tribal land management".[32]The Yurok seeRedwoodsas living beings and only used fallen trees to build their homes and canoes.[33]

The land that will be co-managed was bought by the Save the Redwoods League in 2013 after having been a lumber mill for 50 years.[33]Plans for 'O Rew, originally one of dozens of villages on ancestral lands, include traditional redwood plank houses, a sweat house and a visitor and cultural centre.[34][32]The centre will be displaying sacred artefacts from deerskins to baskets, as well as serving as a hub for the Yurok to carry out their traditions.[33]Rosie Clayburn, the tribe's cultural resources said: "This is work that we’ve always done, and continued to fight for, but I feel like the rest of world is catching up right now and starting to see that Native people know how to manage this land the best".[34]

In 1995, researchers observed that "control of reservation and allotment [of] natural resources has been withheld from them [Yurok people] under the auspices of scientific forest management." Managing the reservation for the benefit of thetimber industryor a "fine stand of timber" prevented Yurok modes of subsistence. As such the researchers note that Yurok were divested from their forest resources for the following reasons: "by straightforwardexpropriationof their lands, as Yurok property rights were ignored and access to gathering sites was cut off; and throughecologicalchange brought about by a shift in management regimes. "[11]

Forest management impacts forests on Yurok lands, since the environment is interconnected despite political boundaries. In United States forestry programs, Indigenous peoples are only given the right to "alienate the land but not to manage the vegetation." In the case of the Yurok, "vegetation management and Yurok culture and economy are closely linked" and as a result "the increasing unsuitability of the changed forest for Yurok subsistence helped push the Yurok to sell their land."[11]The Yurok Fisheries Department works at reviving the streams and the runs of salmon and steelhead trout. Reforesting by tribal members helps to stabilize the banks of the waterways and reduce the sediment load.[35]

Language

edit

Yurok orSaa'agoch' / Saa'agochehl( "Yurok language" ) is one of twoAlgic languagesspoken in California, the other beingWiyot.[2]Between twenty and one hundred people speak the Yurok language today.[36]The language is passed on through master-apprentice teams and through singing.[37]Language classes have been offered throughHumboldt State Universityand through annual language immersion camps.[38]

An unusual feature of the language is that certain nouns change depending upon whether there is one, two, or three of the object. For instance, one human being would beko:ra'orko'r,two human beings would beni'iyel,and three human beings would benahkseyt.[39]

Culture

edit

Food culture

edit
19th century Yurok spoons

The Yurok traditionally fished forsalmonalong rivers, gathered ocean fish and shellfish, hunted game, and gathered plants.[2]Yurok ate varied berries and meats, withwhale meatbeing prized.[40]Yuroks did nothunt whales,but waited until adrift whalewashed up onto the beach or a place near the water and dried the flesh.[41]

Salmon is the vital source of food and nutrients for the Yurok.[35][42]Kaitlin Reed (Yurok/Hupa/Oneida) fromCalifornia State Polytechnic University, Humboldt,described in 2014 the deep connection of salmon to the Yurok people and their identity: "Salmon are a gift from the Creator. Salmon are truly the essence of Yurok existence and foundational to Yurok identity for they would not exist without them."[43]

Fish census from the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries suggest an estimated 650,000 to 1 million adult salmon used to make the run from the mouth of the river to Upper Klamath Lake and beyond to spawn.[44]Also, more than 100,000 spring-run Chinook would return each year.[44]Yet, by August 2023, the Yurok salmon festival missed its basic ingredient - salmon.[45]Because of the scarcity of salmon, the Yurok have been catalysed into "the need to fight for their main sources of nutrition and for their very way of life".[46]

But with achanging climate,the salmon which were once plentiful now face a drastic decline in numbers linked to water quality and fish health.[43]This poses a serious problem for the Yurok whoose life and culture is closely tied with the fish of theKlamathandTrinity rivers.[43]Yurok Tribal Chairman Joe James has said that if the salmon did not survive, neither would the tribe.[43]With the removal of four dams along the Klamath river which will open up near 400 miles of historic salmon habitat, it is hoped that the fish will return.[43]Yurok fisherman Oscar Gensaw said "Once the dams are down, the salmon will know what to do."[47]

The Yurok are known globally for their arts that include basketry and regalia-making, and that salmon give the tribe the physical and mental strength for those arts.[42]Tori McConnell,Miss Indian World2023–2024, said that without salmon "we wouldn’t have had the brainpower or the physical power to create and maintain and preserve the beautiful culture that we see today."[42]

Material culture

edit
Yurok basketweaver

The major currency of the Yurok nations was thedentalium shell(terkwterm).Alfred L. Kroeberwrote of the Yurok perception of the shell: "Since the direction of these sources is 'downstream' to them, they speak in their traditions of the shells living at the downstream and upstream ends of the world, where strange but enviable peoples live who suck the flesh of univalves."[48]

Condor restoration

edit

California condors(Yurok name 'prey-go-neesh') are understood as beings of great spiritual power by the Indigenous people in thePacific NorthwestandCalifornia.[49]Yurok, Wiyot, and other tribes use the shed feathers in ceremonies to treat the sick.[16]The Yurok Tribe Northern California Condor Restoration Program is working with the localRedwood National and State Parksto restore the California condor to the area where they were last spotted around 1892.[50]TheBald Hillsare part of theYurok Triballands.

Due to the cultural and ecological importance of the condor, the tribe began a program in 2008 to reintroduce the condor.[51][15]While based on the latest scientific protocols, Yurok Traditional Ecological Knowledge provided by the tribal elders informs the restoration program.[52]In preparation, they have tested local wildlife fororganochlorine pesticidessuch asDDTand forexposure to lead.[53]They built a re-introduction and handling facility and received a clearEnvironment Impact Statement.[54]An adult condor was brought in to mentor four juvenile birds who would be released. An adult not only serves as a role model but also enforces the social hierarchy that is crucial to the survival of a flock.[16]Two condors were released in May 2022 from a pen in Redwood National Park.[55]A third juvenile was released a few weeks later with the fourth being allowed outside the release pen in July.[56]Each bird must leave the program area voluntarily after entering and exiting a staging pen with the birds being monitored for their safety by researchers who remain hidden in arepurposed shipping container.[57]The staggered releases allow the social draw of still-captive condors to keep the freed birds nearby so the team can observe the birds, who are outfitted with GPS transmitters.[58]As of March 2024 11 birds (4 females and 7 males) have been successfully introduced, with another 5 or more being released this year.[59]

Yurok Tribe Song in Honor of Prey-go-neesh (Condor)

Sacred artifact repatriation

edit

In 2010, 217 sacredartifactswere returned to the Yurok tribe by theSmithsonian Institution.[60][61][62]The condor feathers,headdressesand deerskins had been part of the Smithsonian's collection for almost 100 years and represent one of the largest Native Americanrepatriations.[60][61][62]The regalia will be used in Yurok ceremonies and on display at the tribe's cultural center.[63]

Society

edit
Reconstructed Yurok plankhouse inRedwood National Park

Villages

edit

Yurok Villages ('o'loolekw - "village" ) were composed of individual families that lived in separate, single-family homes.[64]The house was owned by the eldest male and in each lived several generations of men related on their father's side of the family as well as their wives, children, daughters’ husbands, unmarried relatives, and adopted kin.[65]Yurok villages also consisted ofsweat housesandmenstrual huts.Sweat houses were designated for men of an extendedpatrilinealfamily as a place to gather.[64]While during their menstruation cycles, women stayed in separate under-ground huts for ten days.[65]Additionally, inheritance of land was predominantly patrilineal. The majority of the estate was passed down to the fathers’ sons. Daughters and male relatives were also expected to acquire a portion of the estate.[66]

Social organization

edit

Yurok society had no chiefs, but in each village, a wealthy man known as apeyerkacted as leader, who was trained by elders. Thepeyerk's training would include avision questin which he would communicate with thenatural environmentand the spirit world.Peyerkfrom many villages came together to settle tribal disputes and also hosted tribal ceremonies. At these times, thepeyerkwould supply food and shelter for the Yurok people and special clothing for the dancers.Peyerklived in homes at higher elevation, wore finer clothing, and sometimes spoke foreign languages.[3]

Yurokmedicine peoplewere usually women. Women would become shamans after dreaming of being told to do so. Another shaman would then assist her in a ritual dance. Shamans would use plants, prayer, and rituals to heal people and also performed ceremonies to ensure successful hunting, fishing, and gathering.[3]

Every year the Yurok came together for what was known as theWorld Renewal Ceremony,where songs and dances which had been passed on through many generations would be performed. Dancers would wear elaborate clothing for the occasion.[3]

Some sources refer to it Yurok society associally stratifiedbecause communities were divided betweensyahhlew( "rich" ),wa's'oyowok' / wa'soyowok'( "poor" ), andka'aal( "slaves" ).[65][66]Thesyahhlewwere the only group allowed to perform religious duties. Furthermore, they had homes at higher elevations, wore nicer clothing, and spoke in a distinctive manner. The primary reason men became slaves was because they owed money to certain families. Nonetheless, slavery was not considered to be a significant institution.[65][66]Overall, the higher a man's social ranking was, the more valuable his life was considered.[64]

Marriage

edit
Yurok author Che-na-wah Weitch-ah-wah (Mrs.Lucy Thompson) in her wedding dress

When daughters got married, Yurok families would receive a payment from her husband. For the most part, girls were highly valued in the family.[65]The amount of money paid by a man determined the social status of the couple. A wealthy man, who could afford to pay a large sum, increased the couple and their children's rank within the community.[66]When married, both spouses held onto their personal properties but the bride lived with the groom's family and took his last name.

Men who were unable to pay the full sum of money could pay half the cost for the bride. In doing so, the couple was considered “half-married.” Half-married couples lived with the bride's family and the groom would then become a slave for them. Furthermore, their children would take on the mother's last name.[65]In cases ofdivorce,either spouse could initiate their split. The most frequent reason for divorce was if the wife wasinfertile.If the woman wanted a divorce and to take the children with her, her family had to refund the husband for his initial payment.[66]

Demographics

edit

Estimates for the pre-contact populations of most native groups in California have varied substantially. Alfred L. Kroeber put the 1770 population of the Yurok at 2500.[67]Sherburne F. Cookinitially agreed,[68]but later raised this estimate to 3100.[69]

By 1870, the Yurok population had declined to 1350.[70]By 1910 it was reported as 668 or 700.[71]

There were 5,793 Yurok living throughout the United States. TheYurok Indian Reservationis California's largest tribe, with 6357 members as of 2019.[72]

On November 24, 1993, the Yurok Tribe adopted a constitution that details the jurisdiction and territory of their lands. Under the Hoopa-Yurok Settlement Act of 1988, Pub. L. 100-580, qualified applicants had the option of enrolling in the Yurok Tribe. Of the 3,685 qualified applicants for the Settlement Roll, 2,955 people chose Yurok membership. 227 of those members had a mailing address on the Yurok reservation, but a majority lived within 50 miles of the reservation. The Yurok Tribe is currently the largest group of Native Americans in the state of California, with 6357 enrolled members living in or around the reservation.[73]The Yurok reservation of 63,035 acres (25,509 ha) has an 80% poverty rate and 70% of the inhabitants do not have telephone service or electricity, according to the tribe's Web page.

Notable people

edit

See also

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^"2010 Census CPH-T-6. American Indian and Alaska Native Tribes in the United States and Puerto Rico: 2010"(PDF).census.gov.
  2. ^abcdeWhite, P. (January 10, 2024)."California Indians and Their Reservations: An Online Dictionary".San Diego State University Library.RetrievedMarch 5,2024.
  3. ^abcdGray-Kanatiiosh, Barbara A. (2007).Yurok.ABDO Publishing. pp. 4–7.ISBN9781617849145.
  4. ^"Our History".Yurok Tribe.
  5. ^Karuk Tribe of California v. Ammon, 209 F.3d 1366, 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
  6. ^"Yurok Tribe Constitution".Yurok Tribal Code.
  7. ^Super v. Work, 3 F.2d at 90–91 (1926).
  8. ^Andrew Garrett, Susan Gehr, Erik Hans Maier, Line Mikkelsen, Crystal Richardson, and Clare Sandy. (November 2, 2021)Karuk;To appear in The Languages and Linguistics of Indigenous North America: A Comprehensive Guide (De Gruyter Mouton), ed. by Carmen Jany, Marianne' Mithun, and Keren Rice[1]
  9. ^"Yurok Tribe Scoping Comments on the Klamath Hydroelectric Project EIR"(PDF).waterboards.ca.gov.January 29, 2016.
  10. ^Huntsinger, Lynn; McCaffrey, Sarah (1995)."A Forest for the Trees: Forest Management and the Yurok Environment, 1850 to 1994"(PDF).American Indian Culture and Research Journal.19(4): 155–192.doi:10.17953/aicr.19.4.cv0758kh373323h1....the Yurok have been dispossessed of most of their territory. The majority is now owned by timber corporations or is part of national parks and forests. Although the Yurok Reservation includes a contiguous area of fifty-six thousand acres along the Klamath River, in 1995 only scattered parcels, comprising less than five thousand acres of the reservation, are under some semblance of tribal ownership, with the rest mostly in non-Indian hands. Historically, despite the granting of a reservation and allotments to Yurok people, control of reservation and allotment natural resources has been withheld from them under the auspices of scientific forest management.
  11. ^abcHuntsinger, Lynn; McCaffrey, Sarah (1995)."A Forest for the Trees: Forest Management and the Yurok Environment, 1850 to 1994"(PDF).American Indian Culture and Research Journal.19(4): 155–192.doi:10.17953/aicr.19.4.cv0758kh373323h1.
  12. ^Romney, Lee. (2013, February 6).Revival of nearly extinct Yurok language is a success story.The Los Angeles Times. Retrieved February 7, 2013
  13. ^Tracy, B (March 5, 2024)."Massive dam removal project hopes to restore salmon to California river".CBS.Microsoft.RetrievedMarch 6,2024.
  14. ^abPritzker 159
  15. ^abFoster, J.W (2024)."Wings of the Spirit: The Place of the California Condor Among Native Peoples of the Californias".California Department of Parks and Recreation.State of California.RetrievedMarch 4,2024.
  16. ^abcLevy, Sharon (June 22, 2022)."How the Yurok Tribe Is Bringing Back the California Condor".Undark Magazine.RetrievedJuly 6,2022.
  17. ^"S.2723 - 100th Congress (1987-1988): Hoopa-Yurok Settlement Act | Congress.gov | Library of Congress".
  18. ^"Text - S.2723 - 100th Congress (1987-1988): Hoopa-Yurok Settlement Act | Congress.gov | Library of Congress".
  19. ^"Shermoen v. U.S., 982 F.2d 1312 | Casetext Search + Citator".casetext.
  20. ^Pritzker 161
  21. ^Carroll, Riley (July 1, 2021)."Gov. Gavin Newsom visits the Yurok Reservation, rides in canoe on Klamath River".KRCR.RetrievedMarch 24,2022.
  22. ^Sabalow, Ryan; Kasler, Dale (May 6, 2020)."Why California native tribes are cautious about ending shutdown. 'We can't lose a single elder'".The Sacramento Bee.RetrievedMay 6,2020.
  23. ^"Yurok Tribe Construction Corporation".Yurok Tribe Construction Corporation.2024.RetrievedMarch 7,2024.
  24. ^Tedford, Maxwell (January 4, 2024)."Yurok tribe clears way for young salmon on the Sacramento River".KRCR.RetrievedJanuary 7,2024.
  25. ^abcdefgKormann, C. (October 10, 2018)."How Carbon Trading Became A Way Of Life For California's Yurok Tribe".New Yorker.Conde Nast.RetrievedMarch 8,2024.
  26. ^abcdBeck, A. (April 19, 2021)."The Yurok Tribe Is Using California's Carbon Offset Program to Buy Back Its Land".YES! Media / Positive Futures Network.RetrievedMarch 9,2024.
  27. ^"Nearly 2,500 Acres of Land Returned to the Yurok Tribe, Adding to 34,000 Acre Contiguous Yurok Community Forest".Business Wire.April 21, 2021.RetrievedMarch 8,2024.
  28. ^abcdOxendine, C. (February 3, 2024)."Native leaders at Yurok summit demand a seat at the table for offshore wind projects".Tribal Business News.RetrievedMarch 11,2024.
  29. ^abcdeMyers, F. (January 13, 2023)."There's nothing clean about offshore wind development unless California tribes are involved".CalMatters.RetrievedMarch 11,2024.
  30. ^abcdeLoCO Staff (March 8, 2024)."Yurok Tribal Council Votes to Formally Oppose Floating Offshore Wind Energy Projects Along the North Coast".Lost Coast Communications.RetrievedMarch 18,2024.
  31. ^abAlexander, S. (March 12, 2024)."Yurok, Bear River formally oppose offshore wind development".The Times-Standard.Microsoft.RetrievedMarch 18,2024.
  32. ^abcHarrell, A. (March 21, 2024)."NorCal tribe to take back 125 acres, create new national park entrance".Microsoft.RetrievedMarch 22,2024.
  33. ^abcdWatson, J. (March 20, 2024)."California tribe that lost 90% of its land during the Gold Rush get back 126 acres with the world's tallest trees".Fortune.Fortune Media IP Limited.RetrievedMarch 22,2024.
  34. ^abcdAssociated Press(March 20, 2024)."California tribe becomes the first to manage land with National Park Service".The Guardian.RetrievedMarch 22,2024.
  35. ^abRobbins, Jim (August 15, 2023)."Reviving the Redwoods".The New York Times.RetrievedAugust 15,2023.
  36. ^Hinton 32
  37. ^Hinton 33
  38. ^"Yurok Language Project."University of California, Berkeley, Department of Linguistics.2011 (retrieved 1 Feb 2011)
  39. ^Hinton 120
  40. ^Hester, T.R. (2011)."Culture Summary: Yurok".eHRAF World Cultures.RetrievedMarch 5,2024.
  41. ^"Yurok Tribe: Facts, History and Culture".Only Tribal.August 7, 2018.RetrievedMarch 5,2024.
  42. ^abc"Klamath River Salmon, the Yurok Tribe, and the Dams Coming Down: A Conversation with Miss Indian World 2023–2024".NOAA.November 3, 2023.RetrievedFebruary 28,2024.
  43. ^abcdeSawyer, S. (May 24, 2023)."People of the Salmon".U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.RetrievedMarch 4,2024.
  44. ^abBreda, I. (June 11, 2023)."The Massive Dam Removal on the Klamath May Save Salmon but Can't Solve the West's Water Crisis".The Seattle Times.RetrievedMarch 5,2024.
  45. ^"Yurok Tribe Celebrates its Annual Salmon Festival – Without Any Salmon".Active NorCal. August 25, 2023.RetrievedMarch 5,2024.
  46. ^Sherriff, L (October 20, 2021)."'No fish means no food': how Yurok women are fighting for their tribe's nutritional health ".Guardian News & Media Limited.RetrievedMarch 5,2024.
  47. ^Krol, D.U."Restoring the Klamath river after dam removal".USA Today News.Gannett.RetrievedMarch 2,2024.
  48. ^Kroeber, Alfred L.[catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/002494436Handbook of the Indians of California.] Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office. 1925, pp. 22-23.
  49. ^"California Condors and Native American Culture".Visit California. 2023.RetrievedNovember 8,2023.
  50. ^"Redbud Audubon plans talk on Yurok tribe's efforts to return condors to Northern California".Lake County News(Press release). Redbud Audubon Society. February 15, 2022.RetrievedMarch 24,2022.
  51. ^Larson, Mark (December 9, 2021)."Meet Turkey Vulture No. 80".North Coast Journal.RetrievedMarch 24,2022.
  52. ^Wipf, Carly (July 8, 2022)."Yurok Tribe's wildlife director nominated for UCLA genius award".KRCR.RetrievedJuly 14,2022.
  53. ^Sahagún, Louis (April 11, 2022)."Launch of condors on tribal land marks the species' comeback, but a new threat looms large".Los Angeles Times.RetrievedApril 11,2022.
  54. ^Giardinelli, Christina (April 25, 2022)."Condors to spread their wings over the Pacific North West again".KTVL.RetrievedApril 30,2022.
  55. ^"Condors are soaring again over Northern California's coastal redwoods".National Public Radio. Associated Press. May 3, 2022.Archivedfrom the original on May 10, 2022.RetrievedMay 10,2022.
  56. ^Wear, Kimberly (July 13, 2022)."UPDATE: 'We are on A1's Time': Another Release Try is Set for Today".North Coast Journal.RetrievedJuly 14,2022.
  57. ^Berrueta, Sergio (July 11, 2022)."Fourth condor to be released, reintroduced into the wild".KRCR.RetrievedJuly 14,2022.
  58. ^Rasch, Annette McGee (July 3, 2022)."Learning to be condors".Mail Tribune.RetrievedJuly 14,2022.
  59. ^"Humboldt ERFSA learns about California condors".Times Standard.MediaNews Group.March 3, 2024.RetrievedMarch 6,2024.
  60. ^ab"Sacred artifacts returned to Northern Calif. tribe".Seattle Times.August 14, 2010.RetrievedMarch 7,2024.
  61. ^ab"Yurok Tribe Celebrates Reclaiming Sacred Artifacts".National Public Radio.August 13, 2010.RetrievedAugust 15,2010.
  62. ^ab"Back home where they belong: Yurok Tribe celebrates return of dance regalia from museum".Times-Standard.August 14, 2010. Archived fromthe originalon December 3, 2013.RetrievedAugust 15,2010.
  63. ^Brown, Patricia Leigh (September 10, 2017)."Traditions Revived at a Tribal Culture Camp".The New York Times.RetrievedAugust 15,2023.
  64. ^abc"Britannica Academic".academic.eb.RetrievedJune 29,2019.
  65. ^abcdef"Gale - Product Login".galeapps.galegroup.RetrievedJune 29,2019.
  66. ^abcde"eHRAF World Cultures".ehrafworldcultures.yale.edu.RetrievedJune 29,2019.
  67. ^Kroeber 1925:883
  68. ^Cook 1976:165
  69. ^Cook 1956:84
  70. ^Cook 1976:237
  71. ^Cook 1976:237; Kroeber 1925:883
  72. ^abRomney, Lee (April 7, 2013)."Archie Thompson dies at 93; Yurok elder kept tribal tongue alive".Los Angeles Times.RetrievedMay 15,2013.
  73. ^Fimrite, Peter (October 1, 2018)."Yurok tribe revives ancestral lands by restoring salmon runs, protecting wildlife".San Francisco Chronicle.San Francisco, CA.RetrievedOctober 1,2018.
  74. ^Spencer, Adam (April 3, 2013)."Elder leaves legacy of language, love".Del Norte Triplicate.RetrievedMay 15,2013.

References

edit
  • Cook, Sherburne F. 1956. "The Aboriginal Population of the North Coast of California".Anthropological Records16:81-130. University of California, Berkeley.
  • Cook, Sherburne F. 1976.The Conflict between the California Indian and White Civilization.University of California Press, Berkeley.
  • Kroeber, A. L. 1925.Handbook of the Indians of California.Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin No. 78. Washington, D.C.
  • Kroeber, A. L. 1976.Yurok Myths.University of California Press, Berkeley.
  • Hinton, Leanne.Flutes of Fire: Essays on California Indian Languages.Berkeley: Heyday Books, 1994.ISBN0-930588-62-2.
  • Pritzker, Barry M.A Native American Encyclopedia: History, Culture, and Peoples.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.ISBN978-0-19-513877-1.
edit