Wikipedia

Zoroaster

For other uses, seeZoroaster (disambiguation).
"Zarathustra" redirects here. For other uses, seeZarathustra (disambiguation).

Zarathushtra Spitama(Avestan:𐬰𐬀𐬭𐬀𐬚𐬎𐬱𐬙𐬭𐬀 𐬯𐬞𐬌𐬙𐬁𐬨𐬀,romanized:Zaraθuštra Spitāma),[c]more commonly known asZoroaster(/ˈzɒroʊˌæstər,ˌzɒroʊˈæstər/), orZarathustra(/ˌzærəˈθuːstrə/), was anIranianreligious reformer who challenged the tenets of the contemporaryAncient Iranian religion,becoming the spiritual founder ofZoroastrianism(known by its adherents asMazdayasna,meaning "Mazda-worship ", andBehdinmeaning "good religion" ). Variously described as either apoet,prophet,philosopher,sage,and/or awonderworker;in the oldest Zoroastrian scriptures, theGathas,which he is believed to have authored, he is described as a preacher[d]and a poet-prophet.[e][10]He also had an impact onHeraclitus,Plato,Pythagoras,and theAbrahamic religions,includingJudaism,Christianity,and Islam.[11][12][13]He spoke anEastern Iranian language,namedAvestanby scholars after thecorpus of Zoroastrian religious texts written in that language.Based on this, it is tentative to place his homeland somewhere in the eastern regions ofGreater Iran(perhaps in modern-dayAfghanistanorTajikistan), but his exact birthplace is uncertain.

Ashu
Zarathushtra Spitama
Modern depiction of Zoroaster featured at theFire Temple of Yazd.
BornTraditionallyc. 624–599 BC[a]
Greater Iran
Diedc. 547–522 BC(age 77)[b]
Known forSpiritual founder, central figure and prophet inZoroastrianism
Prophet in theBaháʼí Faith
Prophet in theAhmadiyabranch of Islam
Spouses
  • unnamed wife
  • unnamed wife
  • Hvōvi
Children
  • Isat Vâstra
  • Urvatat Nara
  • Hvare Chithra
  • Freni
  • Thriti
  • Pouruchista
Parents
  • Pourushaspa
  • Dugdōw

His life is traditionally dated to sometime around the 7th and 6th centuries BC, making him a contemporary ofCyrus the Great,though most scholars, using linguistic and socio-cultural evidence, suggest a dating to somewhere in the second millennium BC.[14][15][2]Zoroastrianism eventually became Iran's most prominent religion from around the 6th century BC, enjoying official sanction during the time of theSassanid Empire,until the 7th century AD, when the religion itself began to decline following theArab-Muslim conquest of Iran.[16]Zoroaster is credited with authorship of the Gathas as well as theYasna Haptanghaiti,a series of hymns composed inOld Avestanthat cover the core of Zoroastrian thinking. Little is known about Zoroaster; most of his life is known only from these scant texts.[11]By any modern standard of historiography, no evidence can place him into a fixed period and the historicization surrounding him may be a part of a trend from before the 10th century AD that historicizes legends and myths.[17]

Name and etymology

edit

Zoroaster's name in his native language,Avestan,was probablyZaraθuštra.His translated name, "Zoroaster", derives from a later (5th century BC)Greektranscription,Zōroastrēs(Ζωροάστρης),[18]as used inXanthus'sLydiaca(Fragment 32) and inPlato'sFirst Alcibiades(122a1). This form appears subsequently in the LatinZōroastrēs,and, in later Greek orthographies, asΖωροάστρις,Zōroastris.The Greek form of the name appears to be based on a phonetic transliteration or semantic substitution of Avestanzaraθ-with the Greekζωρός,zōros(literally 'undiluted') and theBMAC substrate-uštrawithἄστρον,astron,'star'.

In Avestan,Zaraθuštrais generally accepted to derive from an Old Iranian*Zaratuštra-;The element half of the name (-uštra-) is thought to be theIndo-Iranianroot for 'camel', with the entire name meaning 'he who can manage camels'.[19][f]Reconstructions from later Iranian languages—particularly from theMiddle Persian(300 BC)Zardusht,[further explanation needed]which is the form that the name took in the 9th- to 12th-century Zoroastrian texts—suggest that*Zaratuštra-might be azero-gradeform of*Zarantuštra-.[19]Subject then to whetherZaraθuštraderives from*Zarantuštra-or from*Zaratuštra-,several interpretations have been proposed.[g]

IfZarantuštrais the original form, it may mean 'with old/aging camels',[19]related toAvesticzarant-[18](cf.PashtozōṛandOssetianzœrond,'old'; Middle Persianzāl,'old'):[22]

  • 'with angry/furious camels': from Avestan*zarant-,'angry, furious'.[23]
  • 'who is driving camels' or 'who is fostering/cherishing camels': related to Avestanzarš-,'to drag'.[24]
  • Mayrhofer (1977) proposed an etymology of 'who is desiring camels' or 'longing for camels' and related toVedic Sanskrithar-,'to like', and perhaps (though ambiguous) also to Avestanzara-.[23]
  • 'with yellow camels': parallel toYounger Avestanzairi-.[25]

The interpretation of the-θ-(/θ/) in the Avestanzaraθuštrawas for a time itself subjected to heated debate because the-θ-is an irregular development: as a rule,*zarat-(a first element that ends in adental consonant) should have Avestanzarat-orzarat̰-as a development from it. Why this is not so forzaraθuštrahas not yet been determined. Notwithstanding the phonetic irregularity, that Avestanzaraθuštrawith its-θ-was linguistically an actual form is shown by later attestations reflecting the same basis.[19]All present-day Iranian-language variants of his name derive from the Middle Iranian variants ofZarθošt,which, in turn, all reflect Avestan's fricative-θ-.[citation needed]

In Middle Persian, the name is𐭦𐭫𐭲𐭥𐭱𐭲,Zardu(x)št,[26]inParthianZarhušt,[27]in Manichaean Middle PersianZrdrwšt,[26]inEarly New PersianZardušt,[26]and in modern (NewPersian), the name isزرتشت,Zartosht.

The name is attested inClassical Armeniansources asZradašt(often with the variantZradešt).[19]The most important of these testimonies were provided by the Armenian authorsEznik of Kolb,Elishe,andMovses Khorenatsi.[19]The spellingZradaštwas formed through an older form which started with*zur-,a fact which the German IranologistFriedrich Carl Andreas(1846–1930) used as evidence for a Middle Persian spoken form*Zur(a)dušt.[19]Based on this assumption, Andreas even went so far to form conclusions from this also for the Avestan form of the name.[19]However, the modern IranologistRüdiger Schmittrejects Andreas's assumption, and states that the older form which started with*zur-was just influenced by Armenianzur('wrong, unjust, idle'), which therefore means that "the name must have been reinterpreted in an anti-Zoroastrian sense by the Armenian Christians".[19]Furthermore, Schmitt adds: "it cannot be excluded, that the (Parthian or) Middle Persian form, which the Armenians took over (Zaraduštor the like), was merely metathesized topre-Arm.*Zuradašt".[19]

Date

edit
3rd-centuryMithraicdepiction of Zoroaster found inDura Europos,SyriabyFranz Cumont

There is no consensus on the dating of Zoroaster. The Avesta gives no direct information about it, while historical sources are conflicting. Some scholars base their date reconstruction on theProto-Indo-Iranian languageandProto-Indo-Iranian religion,while others use internal evidence.[16]While many scholars today consider a date around 1000 BC to be the most likely,[7][8]others still consider a range of dates between 1500 and 500 BC to be possible.[2][3][4][5][6]

Classical scholarship

edit

Classical scholarship in the 6th to 4th century BC believed he existed 6,000 years beforeXerxes I's invasion of Greece in 480 BC (Xanthus,Eudoxus,Aristotle,Hermippus), which is a possible misunderstanding of the Zoroastrian four cycles of 3,000 years (i.e. 12,000 years).[28][29][30][31]This belief is recorded byDiogenes Laërtius,and variant readings could place it 600 years before Xerxes I, somewhere before 1000 BC.[5]However, Diogenes also mentionsHermodorus's belief that Zoroaster lived 5,000 years before theTrojan War,which would mean he lived around 6200 BC.[5]The 10th-centurySudaprovides a date of 500 years before the Trojan War.[28]Pliny the Eldercited Eudoxus which placed his death 6,000 years before Plato,c. 6300 BC.[5]Other pseudo-historical constructions are those ofAristoxenuswho recorded Zaratas theChaldeaeanto have taughtPythagorasinBabylon,[28][32]or lived at the time of mythologicalNinusandSemiramis.[33]According to Pliny the Elder, there were two Zoroasters. The first lived thousands of years ago, while the second accompanied Xerxes I in the invasion of Greece in 480 BC.[28]Some scholars propose that the chronological calculation for Zoroaster was developed by Persianmagiin the 4th century BC, and as the early Greeks learned about him from the Achaemenids, this indicates they did not regard him as a contemporary of Cyrus the Great, but as a remote figure.[34]

Zoroastrian and Muslim scholarship

edit

Some later pseudo-historical and Zoroastrian sources (theBundahishn,which references a date "258 years before Alexander" ) place Zoroaster in the 6th century BC,[h][40]which coincided with the accounts byAmmianus Marcellinusfrom the 4th century AD. The traditional Zoroastrian date originates in the period immediately followingAlexander the Great's conquest of theAchaemenid Empirein 330 BC.[5]TheSeleucidrulers who gained power following Alexander's death instituted an "Age of Alexander" as the new calendrical epoch. This did not appeal to the Zoroastrian priesthood who then attempted to establish an "Age of Zoroaster". To do so, they needed to establish when Zoroaster had lived, which they accomplished by (erroneously, according toMary Boycesome even identified Cyrus with Vishtaspa)[41]counting back the length of successive generations, until they concluded that Zoroaster must have lived "258 years before Alexander".[28][42]This estimate then re-appeared in the 9th- to 12th-century Arabic and Pahlavi texts of Zoroastrian tradition,[i]like the 10th centuryAl-Masudiwho cited a prophecy from a lost Avestan book in which Zoroaster foretold the Empire's destruction in 300 years, but the religion would last for 1,000 years.[44]

Modern scholarship

edit

In modern scholarship, two main approaches can be distinguished: a late dating to the 7th and 6th centuries BC, based on the indigenous Zoroastrian tradition, and an early dating, which places his life more generally in the 15th to 9th centuries BC.[45]

Late date

edit

Some scholars[2]propose a period between 7th and 6th century BC, for example,c. 650–600 BCor 559–522 BC.[5][6]The latest possible date is the mid 6th century BC, at the time of Achaemenid Empire'sDarius I,or his predecessorCyrus the Great.This date gains credence mainly from attempts to connect figures in Zoroastrian texts to historical personages;[6]thus some have postulated that the mythicalVishtaspawho appears in an account of Zoroaster's life wasDarius I's father, also named Vishtaspa (orHystaspesin Greek). However, if this was true, it seems unlikely that the Avesta would not mention that Vishtaspa's son became the ruler of the Persian Empire, or that this key fact about Darius's father would not be mentioned in theBehistun Inscription.It is also possible that Darius I's father was named in honor of the Zoroastrian patron, indicating possible Zoroastrian faith byArsames.[44]

Early date

edit

Scholars such asMary Boyce(who dated Zoroaster to somewhere between 1700 and 1000 BC) used linguistic and socio-cultural evidence to place Zoroaster between 1500 and 1000 BC (or 1200 and 900 BC).[15][6]The basis of this theory is primarily proposed on linguistic similarities between theOld Avestan languageof the ZoroastrianGathasand theSanskritof theRigveda(c. 1700–1100 BC), a collection of early Vedic hymns. Both texts are considered to have a common archaic Indo-Iranian origin. The Gathas portray an ancientStone-Bronze Agebipartite society of warrior-herdsmen and priests (compared to Bronzetripartite society;some conjecture that it depicts theYaz culture),[46]and that it is thus implausible that the Gathas andRigvedacould have been composed more than a few centuries apart. These scholars suggest that Zoroaster lived in an isolated tribe or composed the Gathas before the 1200–1000 BC migration by the Iranians from the steppe to theIranian Plateau.[14][47][15][48][49]The shortfall of the argument is the vague comparison, and the archaic language of Gathas does not necessarily indicate time difference.[28][5]

Another possible date from the9th century BCor before was suggested by Silk Road Seattle, using its own interpretations ofVictor H. Mair's writings on the topic.[50]Mair himself guessed that Zoroaster could have been born in the 2nd millennium BC.[51]

Almut Hintze,theBritish Library,and theEuropean Research Councilhave dated Zoroaster to roughly 3,500 years ago, in the 2nd millennium BC.[52]

Traditions favoring a late date for Zoroaster's life have fallen out of vogue with some Zoroastian communities, who see the prospect of their faith having more ancient roots than previously thought as a welcome development.

Place

edit
See also:Airyanem Vaejah

The birthplace of Zoroaster is also unknown, and the language of the Gathas is not similar to the proposed north-western and north-eastern regional dialects of Persia. It is also suggested that he was born in one of the two areas and later lived in the other area.[53]

Yasna9 and 17 cite the Ditya River inAiryanem Vaējah(Middle PersianĒrān Wēj) as Zoroaster's home and the scene of his first appearance. TheAvesta(both Old and Younger portions) does not mention the Achaemenids or of any West Iranian tribes such as theMedes,Persians,or evenParthians.TheFarvardin Yashtrefers to some Iranian peoples that are unknown in the Greek and Achaemenid sources about the 6th and 5th century BC Eastern Iran. TheVendidadcontain17 regional names,most of which are located in north-eastern and eastern Iran.[54]

However, inYasna59.18, thezaraθuštrotema,or supreme head of the Zoroastrian priesthood, is said to reside in 'Ragha' (Badakhshan).[11]In the 9th- to 12th-century Middle Persian texts of Zoroastrian tradition, this 'Ragha' and with many other places appear as locations in Western Iran. While the land of Media does not figure at all in the Avesta (the westernmost location noted in scripture isArachosia), theBūndahišn,or "Primordial Creation", (20.32 and 24.15) puts Ragha inMedia(medievalRai). However, in Avestan, Ragha is simply a toponym meaning 'plain, hillside.'[55]

Apart from these indications in Middle Persian sources that are open to interpretations, there are a number of other sources. The Greek and Latin sources are divided on the birthplace of Zoroaster. There are many Greek accounts of Zoroaster, referred usually as Persian or Perso-Median Zoroaster;Ctesiaslocated him inBactria,Diodorus Siculusplaced him among Ariaspai (inSistan),[11]CephalionandJustinsuggest east of greater Iran whereasPlinyandOrigensuggest west of Iran as his birthplace.[53]Moreover, they have the suggestion that there has been more than one Zoroaster.[56]

On the other hand, in post-Islamic sourcesShahrastani(1086–1153), anIranianwriter originally from Shahristān, in present-dayTurkmenistan,proposed that Zoroaster's father was fromAtropatene(also in Medea) and his mother was fromRey.Coming from a reputed scholar of religions, this was a serious blow to the various regions which all claimed that Zoroaster originated fromtheirhomelands, some of which then decided that Zoroaster must then have then been buried in their regions or composed his Gathas there or preached there.[57][58]Arabic sources of the same period and the same region of historical Persia also considerAzerbaijanas the birthplace of Zarathustra.[53]

By the late 20th century, most scholars had settled on an origin in eastern Greater Iran. Gnoli proposedSistan,Baluchistan(though in a much wider scope than the present-day province) as the homeland of Zoroastrianism; Frye voted for Bactria andChorasmia;[59]Khlopin suggests the Tedzen Delta in present-dayTurkmenistan.[60]Sarianidi considered theBactria–Margiana Archaeological Complexregion as "the native land of the Zoroastrians and, probably, of Zoroaster himself."[61]Boyce includes thesteppesto the west from theVolga.[62]The medieval "from Media" hypothesis is no longer taken seriously, and Zaehner has even suggested that this was a Magi-mediated issue to garner legitimacy, but this has been likewise rejected by Gershevitch and others.

The 2005Encyclopedia Iranicaarticle on the history of Zoroastrianism summarizes the issue with "while there is general agreement that he did not live in western Iran, attempts to locate him in specific regions of eastern Iran, including Central Asia, remain tentative".[63]

Life

edit
19th century painting depicting the events of Zoroaster's life

Zoroaster is recorded as the son of Pourushaspa of the Spitama family,[10]and Dugdōw,[53]while his great-grandfather was Haēčataspa. All the names appear appropriate to the nomadic tradition. His father's name means 'possessing gray horses' (with the wordaspameaning 'horse'), while his mother's means 'milkmaid'. According to the tradition, he had four brothers, two older and two younger, whose names are given in much laterPahlaviwork.[64]

Zoroaster's training for priesthood probably started very early around seven years of age.[65]He became a priest probably around the age of 15, and according to Gathas, gaining knowledge from other teachers and personal experience from traveling when he left his parents at age 20.[66]By the age of 30, Zoroaster experienced a revelation during a spring festival; on the river bank he saw a shining being, who revealed himself asVohu Manah(Good Purpose) and taught him aboutAhura Mazda(Wise Lord) and five other radiant figures. Zoroaster soon became aware of the existence of two primal spirits, the second beingAngra Mainyu(Destructive Spirit), with opposing concepts ofAsha(order) andDruj(deception). Thus he decided to spend his life teaching people to seekAsha.[67]He received further revelations and saw a vision of the sevenAmesha Spenta,and his teachings were collected in theGathasand theAvesta.[68]

The rings of theFravashi

Eventually, at the age of about 42, Zoroaster received the patronage of queen Hutaosa and a ruler namedVishtaspa,an early adherent of Zoroastrianism (possibly from Bactria according to theShahnameh).[69]

According to the tradition, he lived for many years after Vishtaspa's conversion, managed to establish a faithful community,[70]and married three times. His first two wives bore him three sons, Isat Vâstra, Urvatat Nara, and Hvare Chithra, and three daughters, Freni, Thriti, and Pouruchista. His third wife, Hvōvi, was childless.[71][72]Zoroaster died when he was 77 years and 40 days old.[71]There are conflicting traditions on Zoroaster's manner of death. The most common is that he was murdered by akarapan(priest of theold religion) named Brādrēs, while performing at an altar. TheDēnkart,and theepicShahnameh,ascribe his death to aTuraniansoldier named Baraturish, potentially a spin on the same figure, while other traditions combine both accounts or hold that he died ofold age.[73]

Cypress of Kashmar

edit
Main article:Cypress of Kashmar

The Cypress of Kashmar is a mythical cypress tree of legendary beauty and gargantuan dimensions. It is said to have sprung from a branch brought by Zoroaster from Paradise and to have stood in today'sKashmarin northeastern Iran and to have been planted by Zoroaster in honor of the conversion ofKing Vishtaspato Zoroastrianism. According to the Iranian physicist and historianZakariya al-Qazwini,King Vishtaspa had been a patron of Zoroaster who planted the tree himself. In hisʿAjā'ib al-makhlūqāt wa gharā'ib al-mawjūdāt('The Wonders of Creatures and the Marvels of Creation'), he further describes how theAl-Mutawakkilin 247 AH (861 AD) caused the mighty cypress to be felled, and then transported it across Iran, to be used for beams in his new palace atSamarra.Before, he wanted the tree to be reconstructed before his eyes. This was done in spite of protests by the Iranians, who offered a very great sum of money to save the tree. Al-Mutawakkil never saw the cypress, because he was murdered by aTurkicsoldier (possibly in the employ of his son) on the night when it arrived on the banks of the Tigris.[74]

Influences

edit

In Christianity

edit
Main articles:Christianity and other religions,Second Temple Judaism,andCyrus the Great in the Bible

Athanasius Kircheridentified Zoroaster withHam.[75]The FrenchfiguristJesuit missionary to ChinaJoachim Bouvetthought that Zoroaster, the Chinese cultural heroFuxiandHermes Trismegistuswere actually the Biblical patriarchEnoch.[76]

In Islam

edit
Main articles:101 Names of God,Names of God in Islam,andCyrus the Great in the Quran
Further information:Daeva,Jinn,Ifrit,Iblis,andAngra Mainyu

TheEncyclopædia Iranicaindicates that the stories of Zoroaster's life were distorted by quoting stories from Christianity and Judaism and attributing them to Zoroaster, but the most quotations were from Islam after the entry of Muslims into Persia, as it was a means for the Zoroastrian clergy to strengthen their religion.[77]

The orientalistArthur Christensenin his book ''Iran During The Sassanid Era'',mentioned that the sources dating back to the era of theSasanianstate inancient Persianthat refer to the Zoroastrian doctrine do not match the sources that appeared after the collapse of the state, such as the Pahlavi source and others. The reason is that because of the fall of the Sasanian state, the Zoroastrian clerics tried to save their religion from extinction through modifying it to resemble the religion of Muslims to retain followers in the Zoroastrian religion.[78]

A number of parallels have been drawn between Zoroastrian teachings and Islam. Such parallels include the evident similarities betweenAmesha Spentaand the archangelGabriel,praying five times a day, covering one's head during prayer, and the mention ofThamudandIram of the Pillarsin theQuran.These may also indicate the influence of theAchaemenid Empireon the development of either religion.[79]

TheSabians,who believed infree willcoincident withZoroastrians,are also mentioned in the Quran 22:17.[79]

Muslim scholastic views

edit
Main article:Shahnameh

Like the Greeks of classical antiquity, Islamic tradition understands Zoroaster to be the founding prophet of the Magians (via Aramaic, ArabicMajus,collectiveMajusya). The 11th-century CordobanIbn Hazm(Zahiri school) contends thatKitabi"of the Book" cannot apply in light of the Zoroastrian assertion that their books were destroyed by Alexander. Citing the authority of the 8th-centuryal-Kalbi,the 9th- and 10th-century Sunni historianal-Tabari(I, 648)[citation needed]reports that Zaradusht bin Isfiman (anArabicadaptation of "Zarathushtra Spitama" ) was an inhabitant of Israel and a servant of one of the disciples of the prophetJeremiah.According to this tale, Zaradusht defrauded his master, who cursed him, causing him to become leprous (cf.Elisha's servantGehaziin Jewish scripture).

The apostate Zaradusht then eventually made his way toBalkh(present day Afghanistan) where he converted Bishtasb (i.e.Vishtaspa), who in turn compelled his subjects to adopt the religion of the Magians. Recalling other traditions, al-Tabari (I, 681–683)[citation needed]recounts that Zaradusht accompanied a Jewish prophet to Bishtasb/Vishtaspa. Upon their arrival, Zaradusht translated the sage's Hebrew teachings for the king and so convinced him to convert (Tabari also notes that they had previously beenSabis) to the Magian religion.[citation needed]

The 12th-centuryheresiographeral-Shahrastanidescribes the Majusiya into three sects, theKayumarthiya(an otherwise undocumented sect that – per Sharastani – seems to have had a stronger doctrine of Ahriman's "non-reality" ), theZurwaniyaand theZaradushtiya,among which Al-Shahrastani asserts that only the last of the three were properly followers of Zoroaster. As regards the recognition of a prophet, Zoroaster has said: "They ask you as to how should they recognize a prophet and believe him to be true in what he says; tell them what he knows the others do not, and he shall tell you even what lies hidden in your nature; he shall be able to tell you whatever you ask him and he shall perform such things which others cannot perform." (Namah Shat Vakhshur Zartust,.5–7. 50–54)

Ahmadiyya view

edit

TheAhmadiyya Communityviews Zoroaster as a Prophet of Allah and describe the expressions of the all-good Ahura Mazda and evil Ahriman as merely referring to the coexistence of forces of good and evil enabling humans to exercise free will.[80]

In Manichaeism

edit
The four primary prophets of Manichaeism in theManichaean Diagram of the Universe,from left to right:Mani,Zoroaster,BuddhaandJesus.

Manichaeismconsidered Zoroaster to be a figure in a line of prophets of whichMani(216–276) was the culmination.[81]Zoroaster's ethical dualism is—to an extent—incorporated in Manichaeism's doctrine which, unlike Mani's thoughts,[82]viewed the world as being locked in an epic battle between opposing forces of good and evil.[83]Manicheanism also incorporated other elements of Zoroastrian tradition, particularly the names of supernatural beings; however, many of these other Zoroastrian elements are either not part of Zoroaster's own teachings or are used quite differently from how they are used in Zoroastrianism.[84][85]

In the Bahá'í Faith

edit

Zoroaster appears in theBahá'í Faithas a "Manifestation of God",one of a line of prophets who have progressively revealed the Word of God to a gradually maturing humanity. Zoroaster thus shares an exalted station withAbraham,Moses,Krishna,Jesus,Muhammad,theBáb,and the founder of the Bahá'í Faith,Bahá'u'lláh.[86]Shoghi Effendi,the head of the Bahá'í Faith in the first half of the 20th century, saw Bahá'u'lláh as the fulfillment of a post-Sassanid Zoroastrian prophecy that saw a return of Sassanid emperorBahram;[87]Effendi also stated that Zoroaster lived roughly 1000 years before Jesus.[j]

Philosophy

edit
Detail ofThe School of AthensbyRaphael,1509, showing what may be Zoroaster (left, with star-studded globe)

In theGathas,Zoroaster sees the human condition as the mental struggle betweenašaanddruj.The cardinal concept ofaša—which is highly nuanced and difficult to translate—is at the foundation of all Zoroastrian doctrine, including that ofAhura Mazda(who isaša), creation (that isaša), existence (that isaša), and as the condition for free will.

The purpose of humankind, like that of all other creation, is to sustain and align itself toaša.For humankind, this occurs through active ethical participation in life, ritual, and the exercise of constructive/good thoughts, words, and deeds.

Elements of Zoroastrian philosophy entered the West through their influence onJudaismandPlatonismand have been identified as one of the key early events in the development of philosophy.[88]Among the classic Greek philosophers,Heraclitusis often referred to as inspired by Zoroaster's thinking.[89]

In 2005, the Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy ranked Zoroaster as first in the chronology of philosophers.[90][91]Zoroaster's impact lingers today due in part to the system of religious ethics he founded calledMazdayasna.The wordMazdayasnaisAvestanand is translated as 'Worship of Wisdom/Mazda' in English. The encyclopediaNatural History (Pliny)claims that Zoroastrians later educated the Greeks who, starting withPythagoras,used a similar term, philosophy, or "love of wisdom" to describe the search for ultimate truth.[92]

Zoroaster emphasized the freedom of the individual to choose right or wrong and individual responsibility for one's deeds. This personal choice to acceptašaand shundrujis one's own decision and not a dictate ofAhura Mazda.For Zoroaster, by thinking good thoughts, saying good words, and doing good deeds (e.g. assisting the needy, doing good works, or conducting good rituals) one increasesašain the world and in themselves, celebrating the divine order, and coming a step closer on the everlasting road toFrashokereti.Thus, mankind are not the slaves or servants ofAhura Mazda,but can make a personal choice to be co-workers, thereby perfecting the world as saoshyants ( "world-perfecters" ) and eventually achieving the status of anAshavan( "master ofAsha").[citation needed]

Iconography

edit
Depiction of Zoroaster inClavis Artis[it],an alchemy manuscript published in Germany in the late 17th or early 18th century andpseudoepigraphicallyattributed to Zoroaster

Although a few recent depictions of Zoroaster show him performing some deed of legend, in general the portrayals merely present him in white vestments (which are also worn by present-day Zoroastrian priests). He often is seen holding a collection of unbound rods or twigs, known as abaresman(Avestan; Middle Persianbarsom), which is generally considered to be another symbol of priesthood, or with a book in hand, which may be interpreted to be the Avesta. Alternatively, he appears with a mace, thevarza—usually stylized as a steel rod crowned by a bull's head—that priests carry in their installation ceremony. In other depictions he appears with a raised hand and thoughtfully lifted finger, as if to make a point. Alternatively, this could be an Islamic influence, drawing parallels between both religions' conception of the oneness of God.[citation needed].

Zoroaster is rarely depicted as looking directly at the viewer; instead, he appears to be looking slightly upwards, as if beseeching. Zoroaster is almost always depicted with a beard along with other factors bearing similarities to 19th-century portraits ofJesus.[93]

Indian Zoroastriandepiction of Zoroaster from a 1906 travel guide. Derived from afigurethat appears in a 4th-century sculpture atTaq-e Bostanin South-Western Iran. The original is now believed to be either a representation ofMithraorHvare-khshaeta.[94]

Many modern depictions of Zoroaster derive from a Sassanid-era rock-face carving atTaq-e Bostan.In this depiction, a figure is seen to preside over the coronation of eitherArdashir IorII.The figure is standing on a lotus, with abaresmanin hand and with agloriolearound his head. Until the 1920s, this figure was commonly thought to be a depiction of Zoroaster, but in recent years is more commonly interpreted to be a depiction ofMithra.

Western references to Zoroaster and Zoroastrianism

edit

In classical antiquity

edit

The Greeks—in theHellenistic senseof the term—had an understanding of Zoroaster as expressed byPlutarch,Diogenes Laertius,andAgathias[95]that saw him, at the core, to be the "prophet and founder of the religion of the Iranian peoples," Beck notes that "the rest was mostly fantasy".[96]Zoroaster was set in the ancient past, six to seven millennia before the Common Era, and was described as a king ofBactriaor aBabylonian(or teacher of Babylonians), and with a biography typical of aNeopythagoreansage, i.e. having a mission preceded by ascetic withdrawal and enlightenment.[96]However, at first mentioned in the context of dualism, inMoralia,Plutarch presents Zoroaster as"Zaratras," not realizing the two to be the same, and he is described as a "teacher ofPythagoras".[97][32]

Zoroaster has also been described as a sorcerer-astrologer – the creator of both magic and astrology. Deriving from that image, and reinforcing it, was a "mass of literature" attributed to him and that circulated theMediterraneanworld from the 3rd century BC to the end of antiquity and beyond.[98][99]

The language of that literature was predominantlyGreek,though at one stage or another various parts of it passed throughAramaic,Syriac,Coptic,orLatin.Its ethos and cultural matrix was likewise Hellenistic, and "the ascription of literature to sources beyond that political, cultural and temporal framework represents a bid for authority and a fount of legitimizing" alien wisdom ". Zoroaster and the magi did not compose it, but their names sanctioned it."[98]The attributions to "exotic" names (not restricted to magians) conferred an "authority of a remote and revelatory wisdom."[100]

Among the named works attributed to "Zoroaster" is a treatiseOn Nature(Peri physeos), which appears to have originally constituted four volumes (i.e. papyrus rolls). The framework is a retelling of Plato'sMyth of Er,with Zoroaster taking the place of the original hero. WhilePorphyryimaginedPythagoraslistening to Zoroaster's discourse,On Naturehas the Sun in middle position, which was how it was understood in the 3rd century. In contrast, Plato's 4th-century BC version had the Sun in second place above the Moon.ColotesaccusedPlatoof plagiarizing Zoroaster,[101][102]andHeraclides Ponticuswrote a text titledZoroasterbased on his perception of "Zoroastrian" philosophy, in order to express his disagreement with Plato onnatural philosophy.[103]With respect to substance and content inOn Natureonly two facts are known: that it was crammed with astrological speculations, and thatNecessity (Ananké)was mentioned by name and that she was in the air.[citation needed]

Pliny the Eldernames Zoroaster as the inventor of magic (Natural History30.2.3). "However, a principle of the division of labor appears to have spared Zoroaster most of the responsibility for introducing the dark arts to the Greek and Roman worlds." That "dubious honor" went to the "fabulous magus,Ostanes,to whom most of the pseudepigraphic magical literature was attributed. "[104]Although Pliny calls him the inventor of magic, the Roman does not provide a "magician's persona" for him.[104]Moreover, the little "magical" teaching that is ascribed to Zoroaster is actually very late, with the very earliest example being from the 14th century.[105]

Association with astrology according to Roger Beck, were based on hisBabylonianorigin, and Zoroaster's Greek name was identified at first with star-worshiping (astrothytes,'star sacrificer ") and, with theZo-,even as the 'living' star.[106][verification needed]Later, an even more elaborate mythoetymology evolved: Zoroaster died by the living (zo-) flux (ro-) of fire from the star (astr-) which he himself had invoked, and even, that the stars killed him in revenge for having been restrained by him.[106][verification needed]

The alternate Greek name for Zoroaster wasZaratras[97]or Zaratas/Zaradas/Zaratos.[107]Pythagoreansconsidered the mathematicians to have studied with Zoroaster in Babylonia.[108]Lydus,inOn the Months,attributes the creation of the seven-day week to "the Babylonians in the circle of Zoroaster andHystaspes,"and who did so because there were seven planets.[109]Lucian of Samosata,inMennipus6, reports deciding to journey to Babylon "to ask one of the magi, Zoroaster's disciples and successors," for their opinion.[110]

While the division along the lines of Zoroaster/astrology and Ostanes/magic is an "oversimplification, the descriptions do at least indicate what the works arenot";they were not expressions of Zoroastrian doctrine, they were not even expressions of what the Greeks and Romans"imaginedthe doctrines of Zoroastrianism to have been ".[100]The assembled fragments do not even show noticeable commonality of outlook and teaching among the several authors who wrote under each name.[111]

Almost all Zoroastrianpseudepigraphais now lost, and of the attested texts—with only one exception—only fragments have survived. Pliny's 2nd- or 3rd-century attribution of "two million lines" to Zoroaster suggest that (even if exaggeration and duplicates are taken into consideration) a formidablepseudepigraphiccorpus once existed at theLibrary of Alexandria.This corpus can safely be assumed to be pseudepigrapha because no one before Pliny refers to literature by "Zoroaster",[112]and on the authority of the 2nd-centuryGalen of Pergamonand from a 6th-century commentator on Aristotle it is known that the acquisition policies of well-endowed royal libraries created a market for fabricating manuscripts of famous and ancient authors.[112]

The exception to the fragmentary evidence (i.e. reiteration of passages in works of other authors) is a complete CoptictractatetitledZostrianos(after the first-person narrator) discovered in theNag Hammadi libraryin 1945. A three-line cryptogram in the colophones following the 131-page treatise identify the work as "words of truth of Zostrianos. God of Truth [logos]. Words of Zoroaster. "[113]Invoking a "God of Truth" might seem Zoroastrian, but there is otherwise "nothing noticeably Zoroastrian" about the text and "in content, style, ethos and intention, its affinities are entirely with the congeners among theGnostictractates. "[111]

Another work circulating under the name of "Zoroaster" was theAsteroskopita(orApotelesmatika), and which ran to five volumes (i.e. papyrus rolls). The title and fragments suggest that it was an astrological handbook, "albeit a very varied one, for the making of predictions."[100]A third text attributed to Zoroaster isOn Virtue of Stones(Peri lithon timion), of which nothing is known other than its extent (one volume) and that pseudo-Zoroaster 'sang' it (from which Cumont and Bidez[who?]conclude that it was in verse). Numerous other fragments preserved in the works of other authors are attributed to "Zoroaster", but the titles of those books are not mentioned.[citation needed]

These pseudepigraphic texts aside, some authors did draw on a few genuinely Zoroastrian ideas. TheOracles of Hystaspes,by "Hystaspes",another prominent magian pseudo-author, is a set of prophecies distinguished from other Zoroastrian pseudepigrapha in that it draws on real Zoroastrian sources.[100]Some allusions are more difficult to assess:[original research?]in the same text that attributes the invention of magic to Zoroaster,[clarification needed]Pliny states that Zoroaster laughed on the day of his birth, although in an earlier place, Pliny had sworn in the name ofHerculesthat no child had ever done so before the 40th day from his birth.[114]This notion of Zoroaster's laughter also appears in the 9th– to 11th-century texts of genuine Zoroastrian tradition, and for a time it was assumed[weasel words]that the origin of those myths lay with indigenous sources.[citation needed]Pliny also records that Zoroaster's head had pulsated so strongly that it repelled the hand when laid upon it, a presage of his future wisdom.[115]The Iranians were however just as familiar with the Greek writers, and the provenance of other descriptions are clear.[citation needed]For instance, Plutarch's description of its dualistic theologies reads thus: "Others call the better of these a god and his rival a daemon, as, for example, Zoroaster the Magus, who lived, so they record, five thousand years before the siege of Troy. He used to call the oneHoromazesand the otherAreimanius".[116]

In the modern era

edit

An early reference to Zoroaster in English literature occur in the writings of the physician-philosopher SirThomas Brownewho asserted in hisReligio Medici(1643):

I believe, besides Zoroaster, there were divers[k]that writ before Moses, who notwithstanding have suffered the common fate of time.

— Religio Medici,Part 1, Section 23[118]

InE. T. A. Hoffmann's novelKlein Zaches, genannt Zinnober(1819), the mage Prosper Alpanus states that Professor Zoroaster was his teacher.[119]

In his seminal workThus Spoke Zarathustra(1885), the philosopherFriedrich Nietzscheuses the native Iranian name Zarathustra, which has a significant meaning as he had used the familiar Greek-Latin name in his earlier works.[120]It is believed that Nietzsche invents a characterization of Zarathustra as the mouthpiece for Nietzsche's own ideas aboutmorality.[l]By choosing the name of 'Zarathustra' as prophet of his philosophy, as he has expressed clearly, he followed the paradoxical aim of paying homage to the original Iranian prophet and reversing his teachings at the same time. The original Zoroastrian world view interprets being essentially on a moralistic basis and depicts the world as an arena for the struggle of the two fundamentals of being, Good and Evil, represented in two antagonistic divine figures.[120]On the contrary, Nietzsche wants his philosophy to beBeyond Good and Evil.

Notable influence on modern Western culture

edit

The German composerRichard Strauss's large-scale tone-poemAlso sprach Zarathustra(1896) was inspired by Nietzsche's book.

Zoroaster statue (left) atop the Appellate Division Courthouse of New York State.

A sculpture of Zoroaster byEdward Clark Potter,representing ancient Persian judicial wisdom and dating to 1896, towers over theAppellate Division Courthouse of New York Stateat East 25th Street and Madison Avenue inManhattan.[123][124][125]A sculpture of Zoroaster appears with other prominent religious figures on the south side of the exterior ofRockefeller Memorial Chapelon the campus of theUniversity of Chicago.[who?][when?][126]

See also

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^Zoroastrian tradition from no later than the 10th century AD holds that Zoroaster's revelation happened at 30 years old "258 years before the time of Alexander" (almost certainly based on faulty reasoning, seethe section on Zoroastrian and Muslim scholarship), where "time of Alexander" is vague, and could either begin withhis accession(336 BC),his conquest of Iran,or, more likely, with the establishment of theAnno Graecorumfollowing the conquest ofBabylonbySeleucus I Nicator(312/311 BC).[1]
    Most scholars believe this dating to be way too recent based on linguistic and socio-cultural evidence, instead placing Zoroaster's life sometime in the 2nd millenium or early 1st millenium BC, with some suggesting dates as early as the 18th century BC, or as late as the 6th century BC, the latter of which would seemingly match with the tradition.[2][3][4][5][6]Sometime aroundc. 1000 BC,give or take a few centuries, is the most conservative estimate.[7][8]
  2. ^Zoroastrian tradition usually places Zoroaster's death at 77 years and 40 days of age.Celebrations of Zoroaster's birthanddeathplace them at around March 26 and December 26 respectively, which contradict the traditional account. It is likely the dates are symbolic at best and conjectural at worst.
  3. ^Also attested asSpitāma Zaraθuštra.The epiphetSpitāmaitself means "abundant strength",[9]and is thought to have been a clan or family name taken from an eponymous ancestor.
  4. ^Avestan:𐬰𐬀𐬊𐬙𐬀𐬭,romanized:zaotar,cognate with theSanskrittermहोतृ(hótr), referring toVedicpriests.
  5. ^Avestan:𐬆𐬭𐬆𐬱𐬌𐬱,romanized:ərəšiš,cognate with the Sanskrit termऋषि(ṛ́ṣi), describing an enlightened poet of Vedic hymns.
  6. ^Originally proposed by Burnouf[20]
  7. ^For refutation of these and other proposals, see Humbach, 1991.[21]
  8. ^"258 years before Alexander" is only superficially precise.[1]It has been suggested that this "traditional date" is an adoption of some date from foreign sources, from the Greeks[35]or the Babylonians[36]for example, which the priesthood then reinterpreted. A simpler explanation is that the priests subtracted 42 (the age at which Zoroaster is said to have converted Vistaspa) from the round figure of 300.[37][38][39]
  9. ^TheBundahishncomputes "200 and some years" (GBdxxxvi.9) or "284 years" (IBdxxxiv.9). That '258 years' was the generally accepted figure is however noted byal-Biruniandal-Masudi,with the latter specifically stating (in 943/944 AD) that "the Magians count a period of two hundred and fifty-eight years between their prophet and Alexander."[43][1]
  10. ^From a letter of the Universal House of Justice, Department of the Secretariat, May 13, 1979, to Gayle Woolson published inHornby (1983),p. 501.
  11. ^meaning "various"[117]
  12. ^Ecce Homoquotations are per the Ludovici translation.[121]Paraphrases follow the original passage (Warum ich ein Schicksal bin3), available in the public domain.[122]

References

edit
  1. ^abcShahbazi 1977,p. 26.
  2. ^abcdLincoln 1991,pp. 149–150: "At present, the majority opinion among scholars probably inclines toward the end of the second millennium or the beginning of the first, although there are still those who hold for a date in the seventh century."
  3. ^abBoyce 1996,pp. 3, 189–191.
  4. ^abStausberg, Vevaina & Tessmann 2015,p. 61.
  5. ^abcdefghNigosian 1993,pp. 15–16
  6. ^abcdeShahbazi 1977,pp. 25–35
  7. ^abMalandra 2005,:"Controversy over Zaraθuštra's date has been an embarrassment of long standing to Zoroastrian studies. If anything approaching a consensus exists, it is that he lived ca. 1000 BCE give or take a century or so [...]".
  8. ^abKellens 2011,:"In the last ten years a general consensus has gradually emerged in favor of placing the Gāthās around 1000 BCE [...]".
  9. ^Tavernier 2007,pp. 314.
  10. ^abWest 2010,p. 17
  11. ^abcdWest 2010,p. 4
  12. ^Boyce 1996,pp. 3–4.
  13. ^"How Zoroastrianism influenced the Western world".2017.
  14. ^abBoyce 1996,p. 3
  15. ^abcWest 2010,pp. 4–8
  16. ^abBoyce 2001,pp. 1–3
  17. ^Stausberg, Vevaina & Tessmann 2015,pp. 60–61.
  18. ^abSchlerath 1977,pp. 133–135
  19. ^abcdefghijSchmitt 2002.
  20. ^Burnouf 1833,p. 13.
  21. ^Humbach 1991,p. I.18.
  22. ^Paul Horn, Grundriß der neupersischen Etymologie, Strassburg 1893
  23. ^abMayrhofer 1977,pp. 43–53.
  24. ^Bailey 1953,pp. 40–42.
  25. ^Markwart 1930,pp. 7ff.
  26. ^abcMacKenvie, D.N. (1971).A Concise Pahlavi Dictionary(PDF).London: Oxford University Press. p. 98.ISBN0-19-713559-5.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 3 December 2012.Retrieved1 September2017.
  27. ^Durkin-Meisterernst, Desmond (2004).Dictionary Of Manichean Middle Persian & Parthian.
  28. ^abcdefWest 2013,pp. 89–109
  29. ^Stausberg, Vevaina & Tessmann 2015,p. 441
  30. ^Boyce 1982,p. 260
  31. ^Boyce 1996,pp. 285–292
  32. ^abTuplin, Christopher (2007).Persian Responses: Political and Cultural Interaction with(in) the Achaemenid Empire.ISD LLC. p.246.ISBN9781910589465.
  33. ^West 2010,p. 8
  34. ^Boyce 1982,p. 261
  35. ^Kingsley 1990,pp. 245–265.
  36. ^Shahbazi 1977,pp. 32–33.
  37. ^Jackson 1896.
  38. ^Boyce 1996,p.[page needed].
  39. ^Henning,Western Response.[full citation needed]
  40. ^Stausberg, Vevaina & Tessmann 2015,p. 9
  41. ^Boyce 1982,p. 68
  42. ^Shahbazi 1977,pp. 25–26
  43. ^Jackson 1899,p. 162.
  44. ^abWest 2010,p. 6
  45. ^Humbach 1991,chap. "The date of Zarathustra".
  46. ^Mallory, J. P.;Adams, Douglas Q.(1997),Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture,Taylor & Francis, pp. 310–311, 653,ISBN978-1-884964-98-5
  47. ^Boyce 1982,pp. 1–7
  48. ^West 2010,p. 18
  49. ^Stausberg 2008,p. 572
  50. ^"Zoroastrianism".Silk Road Seattle.University of Washington.7 May 2002.Retrieved1 March2023.
  51. ^Mair 1990,p. 34.
  52. ^"An introduction to Zoroastrianism".Khan Academy.Retrieved12 March2023.
  53. ^abcdNigosian 1993,pp. 17–18
  54. ^Boyce 1996,pp. 190–191
  55. ^Gershevitch 1964,pp. 36–37.
  56. ^William Enfield; Johann Jakob Brucker; Knud Haakonssen (2001).The History of Philosophy from the Earliest Periods: Drawn Up from Brucker's Historia Critica Philosophia.Thoemmes. pp. 18, 22.ISBN1-85506-828-1.
  57. ^cf.Boyce 1996,pp. 2–26.
  58. ^cf.Gronke 1993,pp. 59–60.
  59. ^Frye 1992,p. 8.
  60. ^Khlopin 1992,pp. 107–110.
  61. ^Sarianidi 1987,p. 54.
  62. ^Boyce 1996,p. 1.
  63. ^Malandra 2005
  64. ^Boyce 1996,pp. 182–183
  65. ^Boyce 1996,pp. 183
  66. ^Boyce 1996,pp. 184
  67. ^West 2010,pp. 19–20
  68. ^West 2010,p. 24
  69. ^Boyce 1996,pp. 187
  70. ^West 2010,p. 9
  71. ^abBoyce 1996,pp. 188
  72. ^West 2010,p. 31
  73. ^Boyce 1996,pp. 192
  74. ^"The Cypress of Kashmar and Zoroaster".zoroastrian.org.uk.Retrieved6 February2020.
  75. ^Mungello 1989:144 andMungello 1989:182
  76. ^Mungello 1989:321
  77. ^Foundation, Encyclopaedia Iranica."ZOROASTRIANISM II. HISTORICAL REVIEW: FROM THE ARAB CONQUEST TO MODERN TIMES".iranicaonline.org.Retrieved18 May2024.
  78. ^Christensen, Arthur (1936).Book Iran During The Sassanid Era.p. 421.
  79. ^abHinnel, J (1997),The Penguin Dictionary of Religion,Penguin Books UK
  80. ^"Zoroastrianism".alislam.org.
  81. ^Widengren 1961,p. 76.
  82. ^Amin Maalouf 1991, The Gardens of Light
  83. ^Widengren 1961,pp. 43–45.
  84. ^Widengren 1961,pp. 44–45.
  85. ^Zaehner 1972,p. 21.
  86. ^Taherzadeh 1976,p. 3.
  87. ^Buck 1998.
  88. ^Blackburn 1994,p. 405.
  89. ^Gladisch, August (1859),Herakleitos Und Zoroaster: Eine Historische Untersuchung,p. IV,hdl:2027/hvd.32044085119394
  90. ^Blackburn 2005,p. 409.
  91. ^Frankfort, H., Frankfort, H. A. G., Wilson, J. A., & Jacobsen, T. (1964). Before Philosophy. Penguin, Harmondsworth.
  92. ^Jones, W.H.S. (1963)."Pliny Natural History Vol 8; Book XXX".Heinemann. Archived fromthe originalon 1 January 2017.Retrieved28 December2016.
  93. ^Stausberg 2002,vol. I, p. 58.
  94. ^Stausberg 2002,vol. I, pp. 58–59.
  95. ^SeePlutarch'sIsis and Osiris46-7,Diogenes Laertius1.6–9, andAgathias2.23-5.
  96. ^abBeck 1991,p. 525.
  97. ^abBrenk, Frederick E. (1977).In Mist Apparelled: Religious Themes in Plutarch's Moralia and Lives, Volumes 48–50.Mnemosyne, bibliotheca classica Batava [Vol. 48: Supplementum]. Leiden, NDL: Brill Archive. p. 129.ISBN9004052410.Retrieved19 March2017.
  98. ^abBeck 1991,p. 491.
  99. ^Beck 2003,para. 4.
  100. ^abcdBeck 1991,p. 493.
  101. ^Nock 1929,p. 111.
  102. ^Livingstone 2002,pp. 144–145.
  103. ^Livingstone 2002,p. 147.
  104. ^abBeck 2003,para. 7.
  105. ^Beck 1991,p. 522.
  106. ^abBeck 1991,p. 523.
  107. ^Cf. Agathias 2.23–5 andClement'sStromataI.15.[non-primary source needed]
  108. ^SeePorphyry'sLife of Pythagoras12, Alexander Polyhistor apud Clement'sStromataI.15, Diodorus of Eritrea and Aristoxenus apudHippolytusVI32.2, for the primary sources.[non-primary source needed]
  109. ^Lydus,On the Months,II.4.[non-primary source needed]
  110. ^Lucian of Samosata,Mennipus6.[non-primary source needed]
  111. ^abBeck 1991,p. 495.
  112. ^abBeck 1991,p. 526.
  113. ^Sieber 1973,p. 234.
  114. ^Pliny, VII, I.[non-primary source needed]
  115. ^Pliny, VII, XV.[non-primary source needed]
  116. ^Plutarch'sIsis and Osiris,46–7.[non-primary source needed]
  117. ^"DIVERS Definition & Usage Examples".Dictionary.
  118. ^Religio Medici Part 1 Section 23
  119. ^"Klein Zaches Genannt Zinnober".Michaelhaldane.Retrieved19 November2013.
  120. ^abAshouri 2003.
  121. ^Nietzsche/Ludovici 1911,p. 133
  122. ^p. 45ofthe Project Gutenberg EBook.
  123. ^"Edward Clark Potter".New York Public Library.The New York Public Library.
  124. ^"Tall Statue of Zoroaster in New York"ایرون دات کام: عکس ها: مجسّمهٔ تمام قّدِ زرتشت در نیویورک(in Persian). Iroon.Retrieved19 November2013.
  125. ^"Pages 9–12 of"(PDF).
  126. ^"Rockefeller Memorial Chapel | the University of Chicago".Archived fromthe originalon 11 January 2014.Retrieved17 December2013.

Bibliography

edit
edit
Wikiquote has quotations related toZoroaster.
Wikimedia Commons has media related toZoroaster.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zoroaster&oldid=1232882071"