Jump to content

Forth Bridge

Coordinates:56°00′01″N3°23′19″W/ 56.0004°N 3.3886°W/56.0004; -3.3886
This is a good article. Click here for more information.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Not to be confused withFourth Bridge.
This article is about the railway bridge. For the 1964 road bridge, seeForth Road Bridge.For the 2017 road bridge, seeQueensferry Crossing.For other uses, seeForth Bridge (disambiguation).

Forth Bridge
Forth_Bridge_2022.jpg
Forth Bridge in July 2022
Coordinates56°00′01″N3°23′19″W/ 56.0004°N 3.3886°W/56.0004; -3.3886
CarriesRail traffic
CrossesFirth of Forth
LocaleEdinburgh,InchgarvieandFife,Scotland
OwnerNetwork Rail
Maintained byBalfour Beattyunder contract to Network Rail
Characteristics
DesignCantilever bridge
Total length8,094 feet (2,467 m)[1]
Width120 ft (37 m) at piers[1]
32 ft (9.8 m) at centre[1]
Height361 ft (110 m) above high water[1]
Longest spanTwo of 1,700 feet (520 m)[1]
Clearance below150 ft (46 m) to high water[1]
History
DesignerSirJohn Fowlerand
SirBenjamin Baker
Construction start1882
Construction endDecember 1889
Opened4 March 1890
Statistics
Daily traffic190–200 trains per day
Official nameThe Forth Bridge
TypeCultural
Criteriai, iv
Designated5 July 2015
Reference no.1485
Listed Building– Category A
Official nameForth Bridge
Designated18 June 1973
Reference no.LB40370
Location
Map

TheForth Bridge[2]is acantileverrailwaybridge across theFirth of Forthin the east ofScotland,9 miles (14 kilometres) west of centralEdinburgh.Completed in 1890, it is considered a symbol of Scotland (having been voted Scotland's greatest man-made wonder in 2016), and is aUNESCOWorld Heritage Site.[3]It was designed by English engineersSir John FowlerandSir Benjamin Baker.[4]It is sometimes referred to as theForth Rail Bridge(to distinguish it from the adjacentForth Road Bridge), although this is not its official name.

Construction of the bridge began in 1882 and it was opened on 4 March 1890 by theDuke of Rothesay,the futureEdward VII.The bridge carries theEdinburgh–Aberdeen lineacross the Forth between the villages ofSouth QueensferryandNorth Queensferryand has a total length of 8,094 feet (2,467 m). When it opened it had thelongest single cantilever bridge spanin the world, until 1919 when theQuebec BridgeinCanadawas completed. It continues to be the world's second-longest single cantilever span, with a span of 1,709 feet (521 m).

The bridge and its associated railway infrastructure are owned byNetwork Rail.[5]

Background

[edit]

Earlier proposals

[edit]
Main article:History of the Forth Crossing

Before the construction of the bridge,ferrieswere used to cross the Firth.[6]In 1806, a pair of tunnels, one for each direction, was proposed, and in 1818James Andersonproduced a design for a three-span suspension bridge close to the site of the present one.[7]Calling for approximately 2,500 tonnes (2,500 long tons; 2,800 short tons) of iron, Wilhelm Westhofen said of it "and this quantity [of iron] distributed over the length would have given it a very light and slender appearance, so light indeed that on a dull day it would hardly have been visible, and after a heavy gale probably no longer to be seen on a clear day either".[8]

Close up on the base of one of the three double-cantileversof the bridge

For the railway age,Thomas Bouchdesigned for theEdinburgh and Northern Railwayaroll-on/roll-offferrybetweenGrantonandBurntislandthat opened in 1850, which proved so successful that another was ordered for the Tay.[9]In late 1863, a joint project between theNorth British RailwayandEdinburgh and Glasgow Railway,which would merge in 1865, appointed Stephenson and Toner to design a bridge for the Forth, but the commission was given to Bouch around six months later.[10]

It had proven difficult to engineer asuspension bridgethat was able to carry railway traffic, and Thomas Bouch, engineer to theNorth British Railway(NBR) andEdinburgh and Glasgow Railway,was in 1863–1864 working on asingle-trackgirder bridgecrossing the Forth nearCharlestown,where the river is around 2 miles (3.2 km) wide, but mostly relatively shallow.[10][11]The promoters, however, were concerned about the ability to set foundations in the silty river bottom, as borings had gone as deep as 231 feet (70 m) into the mud without finding rock, but Bouch conducted experiments to demonstrate that it was possible for the silt to support considerable weight.[12]Experiments in late 1864 with weighted caissons achieved a pressure of 5 t/sq ft (4.9 long ton/sq ft; 5.5 short ton/sq ft) on the silt, encouraging Bouch to continue with the design.[12]In August 1865, Richard Hodgson, chairman of the NBR, proposed that the company invest£18,000to try a different kind of foundation, as the weighted caissons had not been successful.[13]Bouch proposed using a large pine platform underneath the piers, 80 by 60 by 7 feet (24.4 m × 18.3 m × 2.1 m) (the original design called for a 114 by 80 by 9 feet (34.7 m × 24.4 m × 2.7 m) platform of green beech) weighed down with 10,000 tonnes (9,800 long tons; 11,000 short tons) ofpig ironwhich would sink the wooden platform to the level of the silt.[12]The platform was launched on 14 June 1866 after some difficulty in getting it to move down the greased planks it rested on, and then moored in the harbour for six weeks pending completion.[12][14]The bridge project was aborted just before the platform was sunk as the NBR expected to lose "through traffic" following the amalgamation of theCaledonian Railwayand theScottish North Eastern Railway.[12]In September 1866, a committee of shareholders investigating rumours of financial difficulties found that accounts had been falsified, and the chairman and the entire board had resigned by November.[15]By mid-1867 the NBR was nearly bankrupt, and all work on the Forth and Tay bridges was stopped.[16]

Bouch's proposed bridge (top) along with other proposals on the same principle

The North British Railway took over the ferry at Queensferry in 1867, and completed a rail link fromRathoin 1868, establishing a contiguous link with Fife.[17]Interest in bridging the Forth increased again, and in 1871 Bouch proposed a stiffened steel suspension bridge on roughly the same line as taken by the present rail bridge. This design was examined and pronounced acceptable byW. H. BarlowandWilliam Pole,both "eminent" civil engineers, andParliamentpassed in August 1873 an act authorising its construction.[17][18]Work started in September 1878, in the form of a brick pier at the western end of the mid-Forth island ofInchgarvie.[17]

After theTay Bridge collapsedin 1879, confidence in Bouch dried up and the work stopped.[17]The public inquiry into the disaster, chaired byHenry Cadogan Rothery,found the Tay Bridge to be "badly designed, badly constructed and badly maintained", with Bouch being "mainly to blame" for the defects in construction and maintenance and "entirely responsible" for the defects in design.[19]In particular, Bouch had failed to properly account for the effect that high winds would have on the bridge, and in response to this finding theBoard of Tradeimposed a requirement that all bridges be designed to accept a lateral wind loading of 56 lb/sq ft (270 kg/m2).[20]

Bouch's 1871 design for the Forth Bridge fell significantly short of this figure, as – on the advice of theAstronomer Royal– he had assumed a wind loading of only 10 lb/sq ft (49 kg/m2).[21]This had been accepted by Barlow and Pole in their 1873 assessment of the design, though they qualified in their report that "[while] we raise no object to Mr. Bouch's system, we do not commit ourselves to an opinion that it is the best possible".[21][note 1]

Bouch's design was formally abandoned on 13 January 1881, andSir John Fowler,W. H. Barlow, and T. E. Harrison, consulting engineers to the project, were invited to propose new designs.[23][24]Bouch's Inchgarvie pier was left in place, protruding approximately 7 ft (2 m) from the water at high tide. It lies directly under the present bridge and was equipped with a small navigational lightc. 1887.[25][26]

Design

[edit]
The original (above) and final (below) designs of the Forth Bridge

Dimensions

[edit]

The bridge spans the Forth between the villages ofSouth QueensferryandNorth Queensferryand has a total length of 8,094 feet (2,467 m)[1]with the double track elevated 150 feet (45.72 m) above the water level at high tide. It consists of two main spans of 1,700 feet (518.16 m), two side spans of 680 ft (207.3 m), and 15 approach spans of 168 ft (51.2 m).[1][27]Each main span consists of two 680 ft (207.3 m)cantileverarms supporting a central 350 feet (106.7 m) span truss. The weight of the bridge superstructure was 50,513 long tons (51,324 t), including the 6.5 millionrivetsused.[27]The bridge also used 640,000 cubic feet (18,122 m3) ofgranite.[28]

The bridge's central set of four piers standing on underwater rocks off Inchgarvie island

The three great four-tower cantilever structures are 361 feet (110.03 m) tall,[1]each tower resting on a separategranitepier. These were constructed using 70 ft (21 m) diametercaissons;those for the north cantilever and two on the small uninhabited island ofInchgarvieacted ascofferdams,while the remaining two on Inchgarvie and those for the south cantilever, where the river bed was 91 ft (28 m) below high-water level, used compressed air to keep water out of the working chamber at the base.[29]

Engineering principles

[edit]
Illustration of the cantilever principle

The bridge is built on the principle of thecantilever bridge,where acantileverbeam supports a light central girder, a principle that has been used for thousands of years in the construction of bridges.[30]In order to illustrate the use of tension and compression in the bridge, a demonstration in 1887 had the Japanese engineerKaichi Watanabesupported between Fowler and Baker sitting in chairs.[31]Fowler and Baker represent the cantilevers, with their arms in tension and the sticks under compression, and the bricks the cantilever end piers which are weighted with cast iron.[32]

Materials

[edit]

The bridge was the first major structure in Britain to be constructed of steel;[33]its French contemporary, theEiffel Tower,was built ofwrought iron.[34]Large amounts of steel became available after the invention of theBessemer process,patented in 1856.[35]In 1859, the Board of Trade imposed a limit of 77.22N/mm2(5LTf/in2) for the maximum design stress in railway bridges; this was revised as technology progressed.[36]

The original design required 42,000 tonnes (41,000 long tons; 46,000 short tons) for the cantilevers only, of which 12,000 tonnes (12,000 long tons; 13,000 short tons) was to come from Siemens' steel works inLandore,Walesand the remainder from the Steel Company of Scotland's works near Glasgow.[37]When modifications to the design necessitated a further 16,000 tonnes (16,000 long tons; 18,000 short tons), about half of this was supplied by the Steel Company of Scotland Ltd. and half by Dalzell's Iron and Steel Works in Motherwell.[38]About 4,200 tonnes (4,100 long tons; 4,600 short tons) of rivets came from the Clyde Rivet Company of Glasgow.[38]Around three or four thousand tons of steel was scrapped, some of which was used for temporary purposes, resulting in the discrepancy between the quantity delivered and the quantity erected.[38]

Approaches

[edit]
The southern approach to the Forth Bridge, designed byJames Carswell

AfterDalmeny railway station,the track curves slightly to the east before coming to the southern approach viaduct.[39]After the railway crosses the bridge, it passes throughNorth Queensferry railway station,before curving to the west, and then back to the east over theJamestown Viaduct.[39]

The approaches were built under separate contract and were to the design of the engineerJames Carswell.[40]The supports of the approach viaducts aretaperedto prevent the impression of the columns widening as they approach the top, and an evaluation of the aesthetics of the Bridge in 2007, by A. D. Magee of theUniversity of Bath,identified that order was present throughout, and this included in the approach viaducts. Magee points out that the masonry was carefully planned, and has neat block work even in areas not immediately visible from the ground.[41]: 6 

Construction

[edit]
A view fromSouth Queensferryof the bridge's cantilever towers being built in 1887.

The Bill for the construction of the bridge was passed on 19 May 1882 after an eight-day enquiry, the only objections being from rival railway companies.[42]On 21 December, the contract was let to Sir Thomas Tancred, T. H. Falkiner and Joseph Philips, civil engineers and contractor, andSir William Arrol & Co.[43]Arrol was aself-made man,who had been apprenticed to a blacksmith at the age of thirteen before going on to have a highly successful business.[44]Tancred was a professional engineer who had worked with Arrol before, but he would leave the partnership during the course of construction.[45]

The steel was produced byFrederick and William Siemens(England) and Pierre and Emile Martin (France). Following advances in furnace design by the Siemens brothers and improvements by the Martin brothers, the process of manufacture enabled high quality steel to be produced quickly.[46][47][48]

Preparations

[edit]
The cantilever towers are almost finished in 1888.

The new works took possession of offices and stores erected by Arrol in connection with Bouch's bridge; these were expanded considerably over time.[49]Reginald Middleton took an accurate survey to establish the exact position of the bridge and allow the permanent construction work to commence.[50][51]

The old coastguard station at the Fife end had to be removed to make way for the north-east pier.[25]The rocky shore was levelled to a height of 7 feet (2.1 m) above high water to make way for plant and materials, and huts and other facilities for workmen were set up further inland.[25]

The preparations at South Queensferry were much more substantial, and required the steep hillside to be terraced.[25]Wooden huts and shops for the workmen were put up, as well as more substantial brick houses for the foremen and tenements for leading hands and gangers.[25]Drill roads and workshops were built, as well as adrawing loft200 by 60 feet (61 by 18 m) to allow full size drawings and templates to be laid out.[25]A cable was also laid across the Forth to allow telephone communication between the centres at South Queensferry, Inchgarvie, and North Queensferry, and girders from the collapsedTay Bridgewere laid across the railway to the west in order to allow access to the ground there.[25]Near the shore asawmilland cement store were erected, and a substantial jetty around 2,100 feet (640 m) long was started early in 1883, and extended as necessary, andsidingswere built to bring railway vehicles among the shops, and cranes set up to allow the loading and movement of material delivered by rail.[25]

In April 1883, construction of a landing stage atInchgarviecommenced.[25]Extant buildings, including fortifications built in the 15th century, were roofed over to increase the available space, and the rock at the west of the island was cut down to a level seven feet (2.1 m) above high water, and a seawall was built to protect against large waves.[25]In 1884 acompulsory purchaseorder was obtained for the island, as it was found that previously available area enclosed by the four piers of the bridge was insufficient for the storage of materials.[25]Iron staging reinforced wood in heavily used areas was put up over the island, eventually covering around 10,000 square yards (8,400 m2) and using over 1,000 tonnes (980 long tons; 1,100 short tons) of iron.[52]

Movement of materials

[edit]

The bridge uses 55,000 tonnes (54,000 long tons; 61,000 short tons) ofsteeland 140,000 cubic yards (110,000 m3) of masonry.[52]Many materials, includinggranitefromAberdeen,Arbroathrubble, sand, timber, and sometimes coke and coal, could be taken straight to the centre where they were required.[52]Steel was delivered by train and prepared at the yard atSouth Queensferry,painted with boiledlinseed oil,and was then taken to where it was needed by barge.[52]The cement used wasPortland cementmanufactured on theMedway.[53]It required to be stored before it was able to be used, and up to 1,200 tonnes (1,200 long tons; 1,300 short tons) ofcementcould be kept in a barge, formerly called theHougoumontthat was moored off South Queensferry.[53]

For a time a paddle steamer was hired for the movement of workers, but after a time it was replaced with one capable of carrying 450 men, and the barges were also used for carrying people.[52]Special trains were run from Edinburgh and Dunfermline, and a steamer ran toLeithin the summer.[52]

Circular piers

[edit]
A completed caisson on Inchgarvie with the granite pier

The three towers of the cantilever are each seated on four circular piers. Since the foundations were required to be constructed at or below sea level, they were excavated with the assistance ofcaissonsandcofferdams.[53]Caissons were used at locations that were either always under water, even atlow tide,or where the foundations were to be built onmudandclay.Cofferdams were used where rock was nearer to the surface, and it was possible to work in low tide.[41]

Six caissons were excavated by the pneumatic process, by the French contractor L. Coisea.[54][55]This process used a positive air pressure inside a sealed caisson to allow dry working conditions at depths of up to 89 feet (27 m).[55][56]

These caissons were constructed and assembled in Glasgow by the Arrol Brothers, namesakes of but unconnected to W. Arrol, before being dismantled and transported to South Queensferry.[54][57]The caissons were then built up to a large extent before being floated to their final resting-places.[58]The first caisson, for the south-west pier at South Queensferry was launched on 26 May 1884, and the last caisson was launched on 29 May 1885 for the south-west pier at Inchgarvie.[58]When the caissons had been launched and moored, they were extended upwards with a temporary portion in order to keep water out and allow the granite pier to be built when in place.[58]

Above the foundations each of which is different to suit the different sites, is a tapered circular granite pier with a diameter of 55 feet (17 m) at the bottom and a height of 36 feet (11 m).[59]

Inchgarvie

[edit]

The rock on which the two northern piers at Inchgarvie are located is submerged at high water, and of the other two piers, the site of the eastern one is about half submerged and the western one was three-quarters submerged.[60]This meant work initially had to be done at low tide.[60]

The southern piers on Inchgarvie are sited on solid rock with a slope of around 1 in 5, so the rock was prepared with concrete and sandbags to make a landing-spot for the caissons.[61][62]Excavation was carried out bydrilling and blasting,but no blasting was done within 1.5 ft (0.46 m) of the caissons, and the remaining rock was quarried to within 6 in (150 mm).[60]

North Queensferry

[edit]

Once the positions of the piers had been established, the first task at the Fife end was to level the site of the northernmost piers, a bedrock of whinstone rising to a level of 10 to 20 feet (3.0 to 6.1 m) above high water, to a height of 7 feet (2.1 m) above high water.[53]The south piers at North Queensferry are sited on rock sloping into the sea, and the site was prepared bydiamond drillingholes for explosive charges and blasting the rock.[60]

South Queensferry

[edit]
The tilted caisson
The mode of sinking the South Queensferry caissons

The four South Queensferry caissons were all sunk by the pneumatic method, and are identical in design except for differences in height.[54]ATshaped jetty was built at the site of the South Queensferry piers, to allow one caisson to be attached to each corner, and when launched the caissons were attached to the jetty and permitted to rise and fall with the tide.[58][63]Excavation beneath the caissons was generally only carried out at high tide when the caisson was supported by buoyancy, and then when the tide fell the air pressure was reduced in order to allow the caisson to sink down, and digging would begin anew.[56]

The north-west caisson was towed into place in December 1884, but an exceptionally low tide on New Year's Day 1885 caused the caisson to sink into the mud of the river bed and adopt a slight tilt.[61]When the tide rose, it flooded over the lower edge, filling the caisson with water, and when the tide fell but the water did not drain from the caisson, its top-heaviness caused to tilt further.[61]Plates were bolted on by divers to raise the edge of the caisson above water level, and the caisson was reinforced with wooden struts as water was pumped out, but pumping took place too quickly and the water pressure tore a hole between 25 and 30 feet (7.6 and 9.1 m) long.[61]It was decided to construct a "barrel" of large timbers inside the caisson to reinforce it, and it was ten months before the caisson could be pumped out and dug free.[61]The caisson was refloated on 19 October 1885, and then moved into position and sunk with suitable modifications.[61]

Approach viaducts

[edit]

The approach viaducts to the north and south had to be carried at 130 feet 6 inches (39.78 m) above the level of high water, and it was decided to build them at a lower level and then raise them in tandem with the construction of the masonry piers.[64]The two viaducts have fifteen spans between them, each one 168 feet (51 m) long and weighing slightly over 200 tonnes (200 long tons; 220 short tons).[64]Two spans are attached together to make a continuousgirder,with anexpansion jointbetween each pair of spans.[64]Due to the slope of the hill under the viaducts, the girders were assembled at different heights, and only joined when they had reached the same level.[65]Lifting was done using largehydraulic rams,and took place in increments of around 3 feet 6 inches (1.07 m) every four days.[65]

Building the cantilevers

[edit]

The tubular members were constructed in the No. 2 workshop further up the hill at South Queensferry.[66]To bend plates into the required shape, they were first heated in a gas furnace, and then pressed into the correct curve.[66]The curved plates were then assembled on amandrel,and holes drilled for rivets, before they were marked individually and moved to the correct location to be added to the structure.[66]Lattice members and other parts were also assembled at South Queensferry, using cranes and highly efficient hydraulic rivetters.[67]

Opening

[edit]
The Forth bridge kerchief commemorating its opening printed in red and black with a picture of the bridge, celebratory swagged union flags

The bridge was completed in December 1889, and load testing of the completed bridge was carried out on 21 January 1890. Two trains, each consisting of three heavy locomotives and 50 wagons loaded with coal, totalling 1,880 tons in weight, were driven slowly from South Queensferry to the middle of the north cantilever, stopping frequently to measure the deflection of the bridge. This represented more than twice the design load of the bridge: the deflection under load was as expected.[29]A few days previously there had been a violent storm, producing the highest wind pressure recorded to date at Inchgarvie, and the deflection of the cantilevers had been less than 25 mm (1 in). The first complete crossing took place on 24 February, when a train consisting of two carriages carrying the chairmen of the railway companies involved made several crossings. The bridge was opened on 4 March 1890 by the Duke of Rothesay, later KingEdward VII,who drove home the last rivet, which was gold plated and suitably inscribed.[28]The key for the official opening was made by Edinburgh silversmith John Finlayson Bain, commemorated in a plaque on the bridge. When it opened it had thelongest single cantilever bridge spanin the world,[68]until 1919 when theQuebec BridgeinCanadawas completed.[69]It continues to be the world's second-longest single cantilever span, with a span of 1,709 feet (521 m).[70]

Main article:Forth Bridge approach railways

To make the fullest use of the bridge,several new railway connectionswere built, bringing main line routes to the bridge. The construction of some of these lines was only completed on 2 June 1890, delaying the implementation of a full express train service over the bridge until that date. Even then, there was considerable congestion at Edinburgh Waverley station with remarshalling of the portions of the new, more intensive train service.[71]

Accidents and deaths

[edit]

At its peak, approximately 4,600 workers were employed in the bridge's construction. Wilhelm Westhofen recorded in 1890 that 57 people died. In 2005 the Forth Bridge Memorial Committee was set up to erect a monument to those lost, and a team of local historians set out to name all those who died.[72]As of 2009, 73 deaths have been connected with the construction of the bridge and its immediate aftermath.[73]It is thought that the figure of 57 deaths excluded those who died working on the approaches to the bridge, as those parts were completed by a subcontractor, as well as those who died after the Sick and Accident Club stopped.[73]Of the 73 recorded deaths, 38 were as a result of falling, 9 of being crushed, 9 drowned, 8 struck by a falling object, 3 died in a fire in abothy,1 ofcaisson disease,and the cause of five deaths is unknown.[74]

The Sick and Accident Club was founded in 1883, and membership was compulsory for all contractors' employees.[75]It would provide medical treatment to men and sometimes their families, and pay them if they were unable to work.[75]The club also paid for funerals within certain limits, and would provide grants to the widows of men killed or the wives of those permanently disabled.[75]Eight men were saved from drowning by rowing boats positioned in the river under the working areas.[52]

In 2019, it was reported that historians of the Queensferry Historian Group had discovered that at least 21 more men died building the Forth Bridge than was previously thought, in an alleged "cover up" of the true human cost of the structure, taking the new death toll to 78.[76]Tragically, this arguably makes the Forth Bridge a more deadly structure than the failedTay Bridgewhen counting both the 59 known deaths attributed to theTay Bridge Disaster,that led to the earlier proposal for the Forth Bridge construction being halted and subsequently redesigned, combined with the 14 deaths during its construction.[77]

Later history

[edit]

Race to the North

[edit]

Before the opening of the Forth Bridge, the railway journey from London toAberdeenhad taken about 13 hours running fromEustonand using theLondon and North Western RailwayandCaledonian Railwayon awest coast route.With competition opened along theeast coast routefrom theGreat Northern,North EasternandNorth Britishrailways and starting fromKing's Cross,unofficial racing took place between the two consortia, reducing the journey time to about 81⁄2hours on the overnight runs. This reached a climax in 1895 with sensational daily press reports about the "Race to the North".When race fever subsided the journey times became around 101⁄2hours.[78]

World wars

[edit]
A German photograph allegedly taken during the raid

In theFirst World WarBritish sailors would time their departures or returns to the base atRosythby asking when they would pass under the bridge.[79]The first German air attack on Britain in theSecond World Wartook place over the Forth Bridge, six weeks into the war, on 16 October 1939. Although known as the "Forth Bridge Raid", the bridge was not the target and not damaged. In all, 12 GermanJunkers Ju 88bombers led by two reconnaissanceHeinkel He 111sfrom Westerland on the island ofSylt,460 miles (400 nmi; 740 km) away, reached the Scottish coast in four waves of three.[80]The target of the attack was shipping from theRosyth naval basein the Forth, about 2 miles (3.2 km) to the west of the bridge. The Germans were hoping to findHMSHood,the largestcapital shipin the Royal Navy.Luftwafferules of engagement restricted action to targets on water and not in the dockyard. AlthoughHMSRepulsewas in Rosyth, the attack was concentrated on the cruisersEdinburghandSouthampton,the carrierFuriousand the destroyerJervis.[81]The destroyerMohawkand the cruisers,SouthamptonandEdinburghwere damaged. Sixteen Royal Navy crew died and 44 were wounded, although this information was not made public at the time.[82]

Spitfiresfrom603 "City of Edinburgh" SquadronRAF intercepted the raiders and during the attack shot down the first German aircraft downed over Britain in the war.[82]One bomber came down in the water offPort Setonon the East Lothian coast and another offCrailon the coast of Fife. After the War it was learned that a third bomber had come down in the Netherlands as a result of damage inflicted during the raid. Later in the month, a reconnaissance Heinkel 111 crashed nearHumbieinEast Lothianand photographs of this crashed plane were, and still are, used erroneously to illustrate the raid of 16 October, thus sowing confusion as to whether a third aircraft had been brought down.[83]Members of the bomber crew at Port Seton were rescued and made prisoners-of-war. Two bodies were recovered from the Crail wreckage and after a full military funeral with firing party, were interred inPortobellocemetery, Edinburgh. The body of the gunner was never found.[84]A wartime propaganda film,Squadron 992,made by theGPO Film Unitafter the raid, recreated it and conveyed the false impression that the main target was the bridge.[85]

Ownership

[edit]
A 1913Railway Clearing HouseJunction Diagram showing the Forth Bridge Railway (red) and neighbouring lines of theNorth British Railway(blue)

Before the opening of the bridge, theNorth British Railway(NBR) had lines on both sides of the Firth of Forth between which trains could not pass except by running at least as far west asAlloaand using the lines of a rival company. The only alternative route between Edinburgh and Fife involved the ferry at Queensferry, which was purchased by the NBR in 1867. Accordingly, the NBR sponsored the Forth Bridge project which would give them a direct link independent of theCaledonian Railway.[86]A conference at York in 1881 set up the Forth Bridge Railway Committee, to which the NBR contributed 35% of the cost. The remaining money came from three English railways, which ran trains from London over NBR tracks. TheMidland Railway,which connected to the NBR atCarlisleand which owned the route toLondon St Pancras,contributed 30%, and 17.5% came equally from each of theNorth Eastern Railwayand theGreat Northern Railway,which between them owned the route betweenBerwick-upon-TweedandLondon King's Cross,viaDoncaster.This body undertook to construct and maintain the bridge.[87]

In 1882 the NBR were given powers to purchase the bridge, which it never exercised.[86]At the time of the1923 Grouping,the bridge was still jointly owned by the same four railways,[88][89]and so it became jointly owned by these companies' successors, theLondon Midland and Scottish Railway(30%) and theLondon and North Eastern Railway(70%).[90]The Forth Bridge Railway Company was named in theTransport Act 1947as one of the bodies to be nationalised and so became part ofBritish Railwayson 1 January 1948.[91]Under the Act, Forth Bridge shareholders would receive £109 of British Transport stock for each £100 of Forth Bridge Debenture stock; and £104 17s6dof British Transport stock for each £100 of Forth Bridge Ordinary stock.[92][93]

As of April 2017, the bridge and its associated railway infrastructure were owned byNetwork Rail Infrastructure Limited.[94]

Operation

[edit]
The approach to the bridge fromDalmeny Station
Inside the Forth Bridge as seen from aScotRailClass 158

Traffic

[edit]

The bridge has a speed limit of 50 miles per hour (80 km/h) for high-speed trains anddiesel multiple units,40 miles per hour (64 km/h) for ordinary passenger trains and 30 miles per hour (48 km/h) for freight trains.[95][96]Theroute availabilitycode is RA8, but freight trains above a certain size must not pass each other on the bridge.[97]Up to 190–200 trains per day crossed the bridge in 2006.[98]

Maintenance

[edit]

"Painting the Forth Bridge" is a colloquial expression for a never-ending task, coined on the erroneous belief that at one time in the history of the bridge repainting was required and commenced immediately upon completion of the previous repaint.[99]Such a practice never existed, as weathered areas were given more attention, but there was a permanent maintenance crew.[100]Between 2001 and 2011,[5][101]the bridge was covered in a new coating designed to last for 25 years, bringing an end to having painters as a regular part of the maintenance crew. Colin Hardie, ofBalfour Beatty Construction,was reported as saying,[102][103]

For the first time in the bridge's history there will be no painters required on the bridge. Job done...

— Colin Hardie,BBC Newsarticle, 5 September 2011

Restoration

[edit]

Floodlighting was installed in 1990,[104]and the track was renewed between 1992 and 1995.[100]The bridge was costingBritish Rail£1 million a year to maintain, and they announced that the schedule of painting would be interrupted to save money, and the following year, upon privatisation,Railtracktook over.[100]A £40 million package of works commenced in 1998, and in 2002 the responsibility of the bridge was passed toNetwork Rail.[100]

Work started in 2002 to repaint the bridge fully for the first time in its history, in a £130 million contract awarded toBalfour Beatty.[105][106]Up to 4,000 tonnes (3,900 long tons; 4,400 short tons) of scaffolding was on the bridge at any time, and computer modelling was used to analyse the additional wind load on the structure.[107]The bridge was encapsulated in a climate controlled membrane to give the proper conditions for the application of the paint.[108]All previous layers of paint were removed usingcopper slagfired at up to 200 miles per hour (320 km/h), exposing the steel and allowing repairs to be made.[108][109]The paint, developed specifically for the bridge byLeigh Paints,consisted of a system of three coats derived from that used in the North Sea oil industry;[108]a total of 240,000 litres (53,000 imp gal; 63,000 US gal) was applied to 255,000 square metres (2,740,000 sq ft) of the structure, and it is not expected to need repainting for at least 20 years.[106][108]The top coat can be reapplied indefinitely, minimising future maintenance work.[110]

Panoramic view of the Forth Bridge undergoing maintenance work in 2007

In a report produced by J. E. Jacobs,Grant ThorntonandFaber Maunsellin 2007 which reviewed the alternative options for a second road crossing, it was stated that "Network Rail has estimated the [remaining] life of the bridge to be in excess of 100 years. However, this is dependant [sic] upon NR's inspection and refurbishment works programme for the bridge being carried out year on year ".[111]

In culture

[edit]
Originalrivetfrom the Forth Bridge

In the media

[edit]

The Forth Bridge has been featured intelevision programmesand films, includingCarry On Regardless,Alfred Hitchcock's 1935 filmThe 39 Steps,and its1959 remake.[112]A.G. Barrused the bridge in posters advertising its soft drinkIrn-Bru,with the slogan: "Made in Scotland, fromgirders".[113]In 2005, theBBClit the Bridge in red forComic Relief.[114]Also in 2005,Channel 4documentaryJump BritainshowedSébastien Foucan,a Frenchfreerunner,crawling along one of the highest points of the bridge without a harness.[115]The first episode of the UK television seriesBritain's Greatest Bridgesfeatured the Forth Bridge and was aired onSpike UKon 12 January 2017.[116]

In general culture

[edit]

The location of the Forth Bridge has seen it featured in other cultural forms. In the build up to theMillennium celebrationsa countdown clock sponsored by theRoyal Bank of Scotlandwas attached to the top of the Bridge in 1998.[117][118]Iain Bankswrote the novelThe Bridge,which is mainly set on a fictionalised version of the bridge, which links "The City" (Edinburgh) and "The Kingdom" (Fife).[119]InAlan Turing's most famous paper aboutartificial intelligence,one of the challenges put to the subject of an imaginedTuring testis "Please write me a sonnet on the subject of the Forth Bridge." The test subject in Turing's paper answers, "Count me out on this one. I never could write poetry."[120]The bridge is included in the video gameGrand Theft Auto: San Andreasby Edinburgh-based developerRockstar North.Renamed the Kincaid Bridge, it serves as the main railway bridge of the fictional city ofSan Fierro,and appears alongside a virtual Forth Road Bridge.[121]

D'Arcy Thompsonused a figure of abisonskeleton when comparing it to the structural form of the Forth Bridge.[122]

In his 1917 bookOn Growth and Form,the mathematical biologistD'Arcy Thompsoncompares the structural form of the Forth Bridge with the cantileveredskeletonof anox,the piers corresponding to legs, the cantilevers to thevertebral column:[122]

In a typical cantilever bridge, such as the Forth Bridge, a certain simplification is introduced. For each pier carries, in this case, its own double-armed cantilever, linked by a short connecting girder to the next, but so jointed to it that no weight is transmitted from one cantilever to another. The bridge in short iscutinto separate sections, practically independent of one another... In the horse or the ox, it is obvious that the two piers of the bridge, that is to say the fore-legs and the hind-legs, do not bear (as they do in the Forth Bridge) separate and independent loads, but the whole system forms a continuous structure.[122]

As heritage

[edit]

A comparison of the side elevation of the Forth Bridge to the side elevations of some of the most notable bridges around the world on the same scale(click for interactive version)

UNESCO inscribed the bridge as aWorld Heritage Siteon 5 July 2015, recognising it as "an extraordinary and impressive milestone in bridge design and construction during the period when railways came to dominate long-distance land travel". It is the sixth World Heritage Site to be inscribed in Scotland.[123][68]In 2016, aVisitScotlandsurvey voted the Forth Bridge "Scotland's greatest man-made wonder", beating off competition fromStirling Castle,theCaledonian Canal,theScott Monument,Bell Rock Lighthouse,andMelrose Abbey.[124]

The Forth Bridge has appeared in representation on a 2004one pound coin,issued by theRoyal Mint.[125]The Bridge has also featured onbanknotesincluding the 2007 series issued by theBank of Scotland,which depicts different bridges in Scotland as examples of Scottish engineering, and the £20 note features the Forth Bridge.[126]In 2014Clydesdale Bankannounced the introduction of Britain's secondpolymer banknote,a £5 note featuringSir William Arroland the Forth Bridge (the first polymer banknote wasissued by Northern Bank in 2000). It was introduced in 2015 to commemorate the 125th anniversary of the opening of the bridge, and its nomination to become a UNESCO World Heritage Site.[127]

"Operation Forth Bridge" was the title of the plans for thefuneral of Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburghin 2021.[128][129]

Visitor attraction

[edit]

Network Rail plans to add a visitor centre to the bridge, which would include a viewing platform on top of the North Queensferry side, or a bridge climbing experience to the South Queensferry side.[130]In December 2014 it was announcedAruphad been awarded the design contract for the project.[131]In September 2019, Network Rail submitted plans to build a visitor centre at the South Queensferry side that would serve as a base for the bridge climbing experience, dubbed "The Forth Bridge Experience".[132]The plans were approved in early 2020 but were put on hold due to theCOVID-19 pandemic.[133]Revised plans were submitted in February 2022.[134]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^J. S. Shipway states inPaxton 1990that the 10lb/sqft figure "[seems] to have been the norm for design in the UK at that time", and notes that Bouch's design "seemingly gained Parliamentary and Board of Trade approval without any detailed invesitgation other than the private report by Barlow and Pole... "[22]

References

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^abcdefghi"Forth Bridge".NetworkRail.Network Rail. Archived fromthe originalon 4 July 2015.Retrieved3 July2015.
  2. ^"The Forth Bridge".forth-bridges.co.uk.Forth Bridges Forum. 2015. Archived fromthe originalon 6 August 2017.Retrieved26 March2017.Opened in 1890, The Forth Bridge is recognised the world over as the most famous of cantilever designs.
  3. ^"The Forth Bridge".UNESCO World Heritage Centre.Retrieved26 May2020.
  4. ^"The bridge builders | The Forth Bridges".www.theforthbridges.org.Retrieved26 May2020.
  5. ^ab"The history of the Forth Bridge, Fife".Network Rail.Retrieved26 May2020.
  6. ^McKean 2006,p. 58.
  7. ^Harding, Gerard & Ryall 2006,p. 2.
  8. ^Westhofen 1890,p. 1.
  9. ^McKean 2006,pp. 58–59.
  10. ^abMcKean 2006,p. 62.
  11. ^Paxton 1990,pp. 24–27.
  12. ^abcdePaxton 1990,p. 29.
  13. ^McKean 2006,pp. 73–74.
  14. ^McKean 2006,p. 77.
  15. ^McKean 2006,p. 78.
  16. ^McKean 2006,p. 81.
  17. ^abcdPaxton 1990,p. 32.
  18. ^The Forth Bridge Railway Act 1873,36 & 37 Vict. c. ccxxxvii.
  19. ^Summerhayes 2010,p. 7.
  20. ^Paxton 1990,p. 41.
  21. ^abPaxton 1990,pp. 44–45.
  22. ^Paxton 1990,p. 44.
  23. ^Paxton 1990,pp. 47–49.
  24. ^"History of the Forth Bridge".forth-bridges.co.uk.Forth Bridges Forum. 2015.Retrieved26 March2017.the momentum for a crossing had grown and a new design, by John Fowler and Benjamin Baker, was submitted to the Forth Bridge Company in May 1881, with construction authorised by Parliament in July 1882.[permanent dead link]
  25. ^abcdefghijkWesthofen 1890,p. 13.
  26. ^Paxton 1990,pp. 32, 40.
  27. ^ab"Forth Rail Bridge Facts & FiguresArchived23 December 2012 at theWayback Machine".Forth Bridges Visitors Centre Trust. Retrieved 21 April 2006.
  28. ^ab"Overview of Forth Bridge".The Gazetteer for Scotland.Retrieved21 April2006.
  29. ^ab"Description and History of the Bridge".The Times.No. 32950. London, England. 4 March 1890. p. 13.
  30. ^Westhofen 1890,p. 4.
  31. ^"Kaichi Watanabe".University of Glasgow. Archived fromthe originalon 24 December 2014.Retrieved26 December2014.
  32. ^Westhofen 1890,p. 6.
  33. ^Blanc, McEvoy & Plank 2003,p. 16.
  34. ^Hanser, David A. (2006).Architecture of France.Greenwood. p. 66.ISBN978-0-313-31902-0.
  35. ^Wagner, Donald (2008).Science and Civilisation in China: Vol. 5, Part 11: Ferrous Metallurgy.Cambridge University Press. p. 361.ISBN978-0-521-87566-0.
  36. ^D'Ayala, Dina; Fodde, Enrico (2 June 2008).Structural Analysis of Historic Construction: Preserving Safety and Significance, Two Volume Set: Proceedings of the VI International Conference on Structural Analysis of Historic Construction, SAHC08, 2–4 July 2008, Bath, United Kingdom.CRC Press. p. 209.ISBN978-1-4398-2822-9.Retrieved30 April2017.
  37. ^Westhofen 1890,pp. 36–37.
  38. ^abcWesthofen 1890,p. 37.
  39. ^ab"Forth Bridge"(Map).Google Maps.Retrieved18 September2014.
  40. ^"James Carswell".Dictionary of Scottish Architects.Retrieved3 April2017.
  41. ^abMagee, A. D. (27 April 2007).A Critical Analysis of the Forth Bridge(PDF).First Annual Bridge Engineering 2 Conference.Vol. 8. University of Bath. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 9 September 2015.Retrieved30 April2017.
  42. ^Paxton 1990,p. 67.
  43. ^Paxton 1990,pp. 67–68.
  44. ^Paxton 1990,pp. 68–70.
  45. ^Paxton 1990,p. 70.
  46. ^"Forth Rail Bridge, Firth of Forth".Railway Technology.Retrieved3 April2017.
  47. ^"iron and steel industry".Britannica.Retrieved3 April2017.
  48. ^"Open Hearth Furnace".www.industrialmetalcastings.com.Industrialmetalcastings.com. 2010.Retrieved30 April2017.
  49. ^Westhofen 1890,p. 12.
  50. ^Westhofen 1890,pp. 12–13.
  51. ^Triangulation & measurements at the Forth bridge.worldcat.org.OCLC123250114.
  52. ^abcdefgWesthofen 1890,p. 14.
  53. ^abcdWesthofen 1890,p. 17.
  54. ^abcWesthofen 1890,p. 22.
  55. ^abWesthofen 1890,p. 71.
  56. ^abWesthofen 1890,p. 27.
  57. ^"Arrol Brothers".glasgowwestaddress.co.uk.Retrieved26 December2014.
  58. ^abcdWesthofen 1890,p. 23.
  59. ^Westhofen 1890,p. 31.
  60. ^abcdWesthofen 1890,p. 18.
  61. ^abcdefWesthofen 1890,p. 26.
  62. ^Westhofen 1890,p. 20.
  63. ^Westhofen 1890,p. 21.
  64. ^abcWesthofen 1890,p. 32.
  65. ^abWesthofen 1890,p. 33.
  66. ^abcWesthofen 1890,p. 38.
  67. ^Westhofen 1890,p. 39.
  68. ^ab"The Forth Bridge".UNESCO World Heritage Centre. 2015.Retrieved26 March2017.This railway bridge, crossing the Forth estuary in Scotland, had the world's longest spans (541 m) when it opened in 1890. It remains one of the greatest cantilever trussed bridges and continues to carry passengers and freight.
  69. ^"Longest Cantilever Bridge Span: The Quebec Bridge, Quebec".travelandleisure.com.Travel + Leisure. 2017.Retrieved26 March2017.Finally, in December 1919, the 94-foot-wide, 1,800-foot-long central span was jacked 150 feet into place, and it has remained the record-holder ever since.
  70. ^"Key facts about the Forth Bridge".forth-bridges.co.uk.Forth Bridges Forum. 2015. Archived fromthe originalon 30 June 2017.Retrieved26 March2017.The two main spans of 521m were for 28 years the longest and second longest bridge spans in the world
  71. ^Aberdeen Weekly Journal,4 June 1890.
  72. ^Wills 2009,p. 82.
  73. ^abWills 2009,p. 86.
  74. ^Wills 2009,p. 90.
  75. ^abcPaxton 1990,p. 136.
  76. ^"'Hidden' death toll of Forth Bridge revealed ".The Scotsman.Retrieved7 April2023.
  77. ^"How the work was done".ice.org.uk.Retrieved7 April2023.
  78. ^Nock 1958,pp. 64, 66.
  79. ^King-Hall, Stephen.A North Sea diary, 1914–1918.Newnes.Retrieved3 April2017.
  80. ^W. Simpson,Spitfires Over Scotland,G C Books Ltd., 2010ISBN978-1-872350-44-8,p. 84.
  81. ^W. Simpson,Spitfires Over Scotland,p. 92.
  82. ^ab"Air attack in the Firth of Forth".educationscotland.org.uk.Learning and Teaching Scotland.Archived fromthe originalon 6 April 2015.Retrieved25 July2017.
  83. ^W. Simpson,Spitfires Over Scotland,p. 108.
  84. ^W. Simpson,Spitfires Over Scotland,pp. 100, 109.
  85. ^"BFI Screenonline: Squadron 992 (1940)".Screen Online.Retrieved3 April2017.
  86. ^abAwdry, Christopher(1990).Encyclopaedia of British Railway Companies.London, England: Guild Publishing. p. 132. CN 8983.
  87. ^Thomas, John; Turnock, David (1989).Thomas, David St John;Patmore, J. Allan (eds.).A Regional History of the Railways of Great Britain: Volume XV – North of Scotland.Newton Abbot:David St John Thomas.p. 71.ISBN0-946537-03-8.
  88. ^Conolly, W. Philip (January 1976).British Railways Pre-Grouping Atlas and Gazetteer(5th ed.). Shepperton:Ian Allan.p. 49.ISBN0-7110-0320-3.EX/0176.
  89. ^Whitehouse, Patrick;Thomas, David St John(1989).LNER 150: The London and North Eastern Railway – A Century and a Half of Progress.Newton Abbot:David & Charles.p. 21.ISBN0-7153-9332-4.01LN01.
  90. ^Hughes, Geoffrey (1987) [1986].LNER.London: Guild Publishing/Book Club Associates. pp. 33–34. CN 1455.
  91. ^His Majesty's Government (6 August 1947)."Third Schedule"(PDF).Transport Act 1947 (10 & 11 Geo. 6 ch. 49).London, UK: His Majesty's Stationery Office. p. 145.Retrieved1 July2011.
  92. ^Transport Act 1947,fourth schedule, p. 148.
  93. ^Bonavia, Michael R. (1981).British Rail: The First 25 Years.Newton Abbot:David & Charles.p. 10.ISBN0-7153-8002-8.
  94. ^"Scotland – Network Rail".www.networkrail.co.uk.Network Rail. 2017.Retrieved26 March2017.Network Rail Scotland looks after Scotland's railway infrastructure, including the world-famous Forth Bridge that connects passengers in Fife, north of Edinburgh, with Edinburgh and the Borders.
  95. ^Harding, Gerard & Ryall 2006,p. 11.
  96. ^Paxton 1990,p. 91.
  97. ^"Forth Bridge and Associated Rail Network".Transport Scotland.Retrieved20 July2014.
  98. ^"The Forth BridgeArchived22 February 2008 at theWayback Machine".Forth Bridges Visitors Centre Trust. Retrieved 21 April 2006.
  99. ^"be like painting the Forth Bridge".theFreeDictionary.com.Retrieved23 November2010.
  100. ^abcdGlen, Bowman & Andrew 2012,p. 15.
  101. ^"Spanning the ages",Supply Managementmagazine, April 2019, p. 50.
  102. ^"Forth Bridge painting 'is coming to an end'".BBC News.5 September 2011.Retrieved26 March2017.The Forth Rail Bridge will be free of scaffolding and painters from 9 December
  103. ^Chu, Henry (26 January 2012)."Scotland can stop painting its Forth Rail Bridge".Los Angeles Times.Retrieved13 August2015.
  104. ^"Award for floodlights".The Press and Journal.7 March 1991. p. 11.
  105. ^Glen, Bowman & Andrew 2012,p. 16.
  106. ^ab"Men of Steel: The men who maintain the Forth Rail Bridge".The Scotsman.22 November 2011.
  107. ^Glen, Bowman & Andrew 2012,p. 18.
  108. ^abcdGlen, Bowman & Andrew 2012,p. 19.
  109. ^McKenna, John (19 February 2008)."Painting of Forth bridge to end".New Civil Engineer.Retrieved16 January2010.
  110. ^Glen, Bowman & Andrew 2012,p. 20.
  111. ^"Forth Replacement Crossing – Report 1 – Assessment of Transport Network".Transport Scotland.
  112. ^"The LNER in Books, Film, and TV".Retrieved18 January2014.
  113. ^"A Glow in the Dark Forth Bridge? Easy For Boats to Spot at Least!".Archived fromthe originalon 18 January 2014.Retrieved18 January2014.
  114. ^"Dunfermline.info The Historic City".Archived fromthe originalon 24 August 2013.Retrieved18 January2014.
  115. ^"Jump Britain · British Universities Film & Video Council".Retrieved18 January2014.
  116. ^"Britain's Greatest Bridges".Channel 5.Retrieved26 March2017.
  117. ^"Forth Road Bridge 50th year ad banner plan slammed – The Scotsman".The Scotsman.Retrieved18 January2014.
  118. ^"Growth and milestones".forth-bridges.co.uk.Forth Bridges Forum.Retrieved29 April2017.[permanent dead link]
  119. ^MacGillivray, Alan (30 September 2013)."The Worlds of Iain Banks".arts.gla.ac.uk.The Association for Scottish Literary Studies. Archived fromthe originalon 3 May 2014.Retrieved18 January2014.
  120. ^Turing, Alan(October 1950)."Computing Machinery and Intelligence".Mind.59(236): 433–460.doi:10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433.ISSN1460-2113.JSTOR2251299.S2CID14636783. .
  121. ^Clark, Nick; Ramchurn, Rakesh (20 September 2013)."Grand Theft Auto tour of Scotland as councillors of Hawick 'disgusted' by use of its name for GTA V's drug district".The Independent.Retrieved18 January2014.
  122. ^abcThompson, D'Arcy(1961) [1917].Bonner, John Tyler(ed.).On Growth and Form(Abridged ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 243–246.ISBN0-521-09390-2.
  123. ^"Forth Bridge given world heritage status".BBC News.5 July 2015.Retrieved5 July2015.
  124. ^Ward, Paul (14 October 2016)."The Forth Railway Bridge is voted Scotland's 'greatest man-made wonder'".Express.co.uk.Express Newspapers.Retrieved26 March2017.
  125. ^"The United Kingdom £1 Coin".The Royal Mint. Archived fromthe originalon 24 April 2012.Retrieved21 June2009.
  126. ^"Banknote Design Features: Bank of Scotland Bridges Series".The Committee of Scottish Clearing Bankers.Retrieved29 October2008.
  127. ^"UK's first plastic banknote introduced to commemorate Forth Bridge's UNESCO nomination".Herald Scotland.22 May 2014.
  128. ^Mosalski, Ruth (9 April 2021)."Operation Forth Bridge: What happens now after Prince Philip's death".WalesOnline.Retrieved9 April2021.
  129. ^Traynor, Sian (22 February 2021)."Everything that will happen in 'Operation Forth Bridge' when Prince Philip dies".Edinburgh Live.Retrieved9 April2021.
  130. ^"The Forth Bridge Experience: An executive summary of its feasibility"(PDF).forthbridgeexperience.com.Network Rail Infrastructure Limited. 23 August 2013.Retrieved20 July2014.
  131. ^"Design For £15m Forth Bridge Visitor Won by Arup".obas.com. 15 December 2012.
  132. ^"Visitors to be able to climb Forth Bridge".BBC News.4 March 2020.Retrieved14 February2022.
  133. ^Ryder, Gemma (21 March 2021)."Forth Bridge Experience attraction stopped in its tracks".Dunfermline Press.Retrieved14 February2022.
  134. ^Smith, Roger (11 February 2022)."Revised planning application for Forth Bridge Experience".RailAdvent.Retrieved14 February2022.

Bibliography

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related toForth Bridge.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Forth_Bridge&oldid=1252667683"