Primary constraint
The distinction between primary and secondary constraints is not a very fundamental one. It depends very much on the original Lagrangian which we start off with. Once we have gone over to the Hamiltonian formalism, we can really forget about the distinction between primary and secondary constraints.[1]
InHamiltonian mechanics,aprimary constraintis a relation between thecoordinatesandmomentathat holds without using theequations of motion.[2]Asecondary constraintis one that is not primary—in other words it holds when the equations of motion are satisfied, but need not hold if they are not satisfied[3]The secondary constraints arise from the condition that the primary constraints should be preserved intime.A few authors use more refined terminology, where the non-primary constraints are divided into secondary, tertiary, quaternary, etc. constraints. The secondary constraints arise directly from the condition that the primary constraints are preserved bytime,the tertiary constraints arise from the condition that the secondary ones are also preserved by time, and so on. Primary and secondary constraints were introduced by Anderson andBergmann[4]and developed by Dirac.[5][6][7][8]
The terminology of primary and secondary constraints is confusingly similar to that offirst and second class constraints.These divisions are independent: both first and second class constraints can be either primary or secondary, so this gives altogether four different classes of constraints.
References
[edit]- Anderson, James L.; Bergmann, Peter G. (1951). "Constraints in covariant field theories".Physical Review.Series 2.83(5): 1018–1025.Bibcode:1951PhRv...83.1018A.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.83.1018.MR0044382.
- Dirac, Paul A.M.(1964).Lectures on quantum mechanics.Belfer Graduate School of Science Monographs Series. Vol. 2. New York: Belfer Graduate School of Science.ISBN9780486417134.MR2220894.2001 reprint by Dover.
Footnotes
- ^Dirac 1964,p. 43.
- ^Dirac 1964,p. 8.
- ^Dirac 1964,p. 14.
- ^Anderson & Bergmann 1951,p. 1019.
- ^Dirac, Paul A.M.(1950)."Generalized Hamiltonian dynamics".Canadian Journal of Mathematics.2:129–148.doi:10.4153/CJM-1950-012-1.ISSN0008-414X.MR0043724.S2CID119748805.
- ^Dirac, Paul A.M.(1958). "Generalized Hamiltonian dynamics".Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.246(1246): 326–332.Bibcode:1958RSPSA.246..326D.doi:10.1098/rspa.1958.0141.ISSN0962-8444.JSTOR100496.MR0094205.S2CID122175789.
- ^Dirac, Paul A.M.(1958). "The theory of gravitation in Hamiltonian form".Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.246(1246): 333–343.Bibcode:1958RSPSA.246..333D.doi:10.1098/rspa.1958.0142.ISSN0962-8444.JSTOR100497.MR0094206.S2CID122053391.
- ^Dirac 1964.
Further reading
[edit]- Salisbury, D.C. (2006).Peter Bergmann and the invention of constrained Hamiltonian dynamics.arXiv:physics/0608067.Bibcode:2006physics...8067S.