Mayor–council government
Part of thePolitics series |
Common forms oflocal government |
---|
![]() |
Amayor–council governmentis a system oflocal governmentin which amayorwho is directly elected by the voters acts as chief executive, while a separately electedcity councilconstitutes the legislative body. It is one of the two most common forms oflocal government in the United States,and is the form most frequently adopted in large cities, although the other common form,council–manager government,is the local government form of more municipalities.
The form may be categorized into two main variations depending on the relative power of the mayor compared to the council. In a typicalstrong-mayorsystem, the elected mayor is granted almost total administrative authority with the power to appoint and dismiss department heads, although some city charters or prevailing state law may require council ratification.
In such a system, the mayor's administrative staff prepares the city budget, although that budget usually must be approved by the council.[1]
Conversely, in aweak-mayorsystem, the mayor has no formal authority outside the council, serving a largely ceremonial role as council chairperson. The mayor cannot directly appoint or remove officials and lacks veto power over council votes.[2]
Most major North American cities use the strong-mayor form of the mayor–council system, whereas middle-sized and small North American cities tend to use the council–manager system.[3]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^Kathy Hayes; Semoon Chang (July 1990). "The Relative Efficiency of City Manager and Mayor–Council Forms of Government".Southern Economic Journal.57(1): 167–177.doi:10.2307/1060487.JSTOR1060487.
- ^Saffell, Dave C.; Harry Basehart (2009).State and Local Government: Politics and Public Policies(9th ed.). McGraw Hill. p. 237.ISBN978-0-07-352632-4.
- ^George C. Edwards III; Robert L. Lineberry; Martin P. Wattenberg (2006).Government in America.Pearson Education. pp. 677–678.ISBN0-321-29236-7.