Jump to content

Template:Commons category/doc: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deletedContent added
No edit summary
Tags:RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
mReverted 1 edit by27.55.95.15(talk) to last revision by Uranium Site
Line 44: Line 44:
In categories, this template should be grouped with other templates at the beginning of the category introduction. This avoids unnecessary white space as any text is floated around the template boxes.
In categories, this template should be grouped with other templates at the beginning of the category introduction. This avoids unnecessary white space as any text is floated around the template boxes.
<!-- Red messages in preview mode link to this section. -->
<!-- Red messages in preview mode link to this section. -->

== Resolving discrepancies ==
This template compares locally-defined values against the interwiki links to Commons stored on Wikidata. The discrepancies are highlighted through the addition of [[#Maintenance categories|maintenance categories]]. Pages can be removed from the tracking categories by correcting the local link; removing misplaced template uses; fixing the sitelinks on Wikidata; or expanding the category system on Commons. Ideally there should be one Commons category link per article, and it should be easy for readers to identify the related content on Commons. Some suggested approaches are:

The link is to a more general topic than the article:
# Is there a more specific commons category that could be linked to instead?
# If not, could it be created with images connected to the article?
# Or if there aren't any images connected to the article on Commons, could the Commons category link be removed?

There are links to multiple commons categories in the article:
# Could they be replaced by a single Commons category that has the rest as subcategories?
# Do all of the commons categories still exist?
# Are they all necessary, or could they be removed?

The Commons category links back to the wrong Wikipedia article:
# Can you move the sitelink to the Wikidata item for the article?


== Tracking categories ==
== Tracking categories ==

Revision as of 20:13, 8 May 2021

{{Commons category}} links to a "Category:" name in theWikimedia Commonsrepository that corresponds to the article or category. If the Commons category name is misspelled or missing, the link will still appear "blue"even though the link will fail. Check the existence of the category on commons as well as the spelling of names carefully.User:Pi botwill try to correct, or remove, links to non-existent categories. In articles, this template should be placed at the top of the last section on the page. A warning will appear if the Commons link is not on Wikidata.

Usage

{{Commons category}} Fetches the Commons sitelink from Wikidata (where available)
{{Commons category|catname}} Puts link-box connecting titlecatname
{{Commons category|catname|showname}} Puts link-box showing the titleshowname
{{Commons category|catname|position=left}} Floats link-box to the left side, as option to align box to left-margin
{{Commons category|nowrap=yes}} Stops the text of the commons category from wrapping
{{Commons category|lcfirst=yes}} Displays the first letter as lower-case

The two parameterscatnameandshowname(1 & 2) are optional, and are intended for cases where the Commons category name is different from the Wikipedia page name. The first parameter is the name of the corresponding category on the Wikimedia Commons,withoutthe "Category:"prefix. If this first parameter is used, then the template will display the Commons category name, which may be confusing to readers. This text can be overridden by the second parameter, where the Wikipedia page name would typically be used.

For example, on thePolar bearpage,{{Commons category|Ursus maritimus|Polar bears}}produces a link toCommons:Category:Ursus maritimusdisplayed as "Polar bears".

The parameter|position=accepts one value,|position=left,that moves the box to the left side, instead of the default right side. More information may be found atTemplate:Side box.

Location

If using a large, graphical template produces odd layout problems, like the excessive white space shown on the right of this screenshot, then switch to a differentsister template.

☒NDo not place this template in a section all by itself without floating left.

☒NDo not place this template in a section containing columns without floating left.

☒NDo not indent this template with colon (:) or a bullet (*) markup.

In articles, this template should be placed at thetopof the last section on the page. Ondisambiguation pages,this template is usually placed at the top of the page. SeeWikipedia:Wikimedia sister projects#Where to place linksfor more information and alternatives.

In categories, this template should be grouped with other templates at the beginning of the category introduction. This avoids unnecessary white space as any text is floated around the template boxes.

Resolving discrepancies

This template compares locally-defined values against the interwiki links to Commons stored on Wikidata. The discrepancies are highlighted through the addition ofmaintenance categories.Pages can be removed from the tracking categories by correcting the local link; removing misplaced template uses; fixing the sitelinks on Wikidata; or expanding the category system on Commons. Ideally there should be one Commons category link per article, and it should be easy for readers to identify the related content on Commons. Some suggested approaches are:

The link is to a more general topic than the article:

  1. Is there a more specific commons category that could be linked to instead?
  2. If not, could it be created with images connected to the article?
  3. Or if there aren't any images connected to the article on Commons, could the Commons category link be removed?

There are links to multiple commons categories in the article:

  1. Could they be replaced by a single Commons category that has the rest as subcategories?
  2. Do all of the commons categories still exist?
  3. Are they all necessary, or could they be removed?

The Commons category links back to the wrong Wikipedia article:

  1. Can you move the sitelink to the Wikidata item for the article?

Tracking categories

Normal categories

Maintenance categories

TemplateData

This is theTemplateDatafor this template used byTemplateWizard,VisualEditorand other tools.See a monthly parameter usage reportforTemplate:Commons categoryin articles based on its TemplateData.

TemplateData for Commons category

This template creates a small box containing a link to a category on Commons. If no value is provided the Commons category value from Wikidata is used, and if none was provided there then the page name is used.

Template parameters

ParameterDescriptionTypeStatus
Category name1

The name of the Commons category this template will link to. If no value is provided the Commons category value from Wikidata is used, and if none was provided there then the page name is used.

Stringoptional
Displayed text2

The text that the link will display to the user. If no value is provided it will default to category name or page name, in that order.

Stringoptional
Positionposition

When set to 'left', the template will be positioned on the left side of the page. Otherwise it will default to the right side.

Stringoptional
nowrapnowrap

Stops the text of the commons category from wrapping

Stringoptional
lcfirstlcfirst

Displays the first letter as lower-case

Stringoptional

Redirects

See also