Wikipedia:Consensus: Revision history

18 September 2024

• curprev01:3201:32, 18 September 2024‎Moxytalkcontribs‎m23,911 bytes+23,911‎Reverted 1 edit byTheWikiManager123(talk) to last revision by WaterQuarkTags:TwinkleUndo
• curprev01:3101:31, 18 September 2024‎TheWikiManager123talkcontribs‎mempty−23,911‎←Blanked the pageTags:BlankingManual revertReverted
• curprev01:3101:31, 18 September 2024‎WaterQuarktalkcontribs‎23,911 bytes+23,911‎rvv | Undid revision1246289403byTheWikiManager123(talk)Tags:UndoReverted
• curprev01:2901:29, 18 September 2024‎TheWikiManager123talkcontribs‎mempty−23,911‎←Blanked the pageTags:BlankingReverted

17 September 2024

• curprev07:0407:04, 17 September 2024‎Polygnotustalkcontribs‎23,911 bytes−25‎Undid revision1246152515byPolygnotus(talk)Tag:Undo
• curprev06:4306:43, 17 September 2024‎Polygnotustalkcontribs‎23,936 bytes+25‎back to consensus version Undid revision1246126001byButwhatdoiknow(talk)Tags:UndoReverted
• curprev01:3201:32, 17 September 2024‎Butwhatdoiknowtalkcontribs‎23,911 bytes−25‎best practice is to provide an edit summary or a *contemporaneous* talk page explanationTags:UndoReverted

16 September 2024

• curprev22:0722:07, 16 September 2024‎Polygnotustalkcontribs‎23,936 bytes+12‎→‎Through editingTag:Reverted
• curprev22:0622:06, 16 September 2024‎Polygnotustalkcontribs‎23,924 bytes+13‎→‎Through editingTag:Reverted
• curprev21:5121:51, 16 September 2024‎ActivelyDisinterestedtalkcontribs‎23,911 bytes−1‎Reverted. That was an edit from 12 years ago, and doesn't make a requirement for edit summarise only that you have to explain you edits (communication is required).Tag:Manual revert
• curprev21:0721:07, 16 September 2024‎Polygnotustalkcontribs‎23,912 bytes+1‎→‎Through editingTag:Reverted
• curprev21:0721:07, 16 September 2024‎Polygnotustalkcontribs‎23,911 bytes0‎rv https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AConsensus&diff=prev&oldid=517429131 this is against the consensus that editsummaries are not required.Tag:Reverted

30 August 2024

• curprev23:3123:31, 30 August 2024‎WhatamIdoingtalkcontribs‎23,911 bytes+108‎→‎No consensus after discussion:Proposal to splitWP:NOCONout of this page and intoWP:Closing discussionsTag:2017 wikitext editor

30 July 2024

• curprev14:1014:10, 30 July 2024‎Kiwiz1338talkcontribs‎23,803 bytes+6‎→‎Through editing:ce

22 June 2024

• curprev02:1102:11, 22 June 2024‎Butwhatdoiknowtalkcontribs‎23,797 bytes−3‎→‎Through editing:Let's not add yet another type of consensus to be confused about

21 June 2024

• curprev17:0717:07, 21 June 2024‎AlsoWukaitalkcontribs‎23,800 bytes−15‎→‎Through editing:ce

2 May 2024

• curprev20:1020:10, 2 May 2024‎Matrixtalkcontribs‎23,815 bytes+275‎→‎No consensus after discussion:adding what seems to have been de facto done for a long time (see pg history ofWikipedia:Precautionary principle)

4 April 2024

• curprev23:3923:39, 4 April 2024‎SmokeyJoetalkcontribs‎23,540 bytes−8‎→‎top:perWP:LINKBOXES.WP:CONis 50% more popular, and the two are too similar to need listing both. Shortcuts do not need to be in LINKBOXES for them to work.
• curprev23:3623:36, 4 April 2024‎SmokeyJoetalkcontribs‎23,548 bytes−17‎Undid revision1217267555byNicolausPrime(talk). FailsWP:LINKBOXES.LINKBOXES are not for listing all shortcuts. With 90-day pageviews of 384, 171, onlyWP:FORUMSHOPis justified.Tag:Undo
• curprev20:2620:26, 4 April 2024‎NicolausPrimetalkcontribs‎23,565 bytes+17‎WP:FORUMSHOPPING is another shortcut commonly usedTag:Reverted

27 March 2024

• curprev07:3107:31, 27 March 2024‎Thinker78talkcontribs‎m23,548 bytes−1‎split first sentence for better reading
• curprev00:3900:39, 27 March 2024‎Willondontalkcontribs‎m23,549 bytes+1‎→‎top:add comma
• curprev00:3900:39, 27 March 2024‎Willondontalkcontribs‎23,548 bytes+2‎→‎top:better wording

1 February 2024

• curprev23:5023:50, 1 February 2024‎Thinker78talkcontribs‎23,546 bytes−4‎does not >>> neither
• curprev23:4823:48, 1 February 2024‎Thinker78talkcontribs‎m23,550 bytes+2‎added possessive
• curprev23:4323:43, 1 February 2024‎Thinker78talkcontribs‎23,548 bytes+2‎switched words to avoid two wikilinks being close together
• curprev23:3923:39, 1 February 2024‎Thinker78talkcontribs‎23,546 bytes−139‎removed redundant info from lead and copyedited it
• curprev23:3623:36, 1 February 2024‎Thinker78talkcontribs‎23,685 bytes−66‎copyedited first paragraph to remove redundancies
• curprev23:2923:29, 1 February 2024‎Thinker78talkcontribs‎23,751 bytes0‎switched info from the nutshell template to the lead as the previous nutshell info seems more appropriate as first sentence of the page; likewise, the previous info moved from the lead seems to contain language expressly as a nutshell explanation of the page

28 January 2024

• curprev18:5318:53, 28 January 2024‎Shooterwalkertalkcontribs‎23,751 bytes+49‎→‎See also

17 January 2024

• curprev16:0616:06, 17 January 2024‎Peter Gulutzantalkcontribs‎23,702 bytes−113‎Undid revision 1196345128 byWhatamIdoing(talk) An RfC can be a consensus among a limited group of editors, so it shouldn't be mentioned here as an exception about a consensus among a limited group of editors.Tag:Undo
• curprev04:4904:49, 17 January 2024‎WhatamIdoingtalkcontribs‎23,815 bytes+113‎→‎Levels of consensus:Mention RFCs as example of community-wide consensusTags:Reverted2017 wikitext editor

14 January 2024

• curprev05:0005:00, 14 January 2024‎Dekimasutalkcontribs‎23,702 bytes−6‎→‎No consensus after discussion:"most recent" already means "prior"; there is still awkwardness in the wording of these two sentences, though

7 January 2024

• curprev10:0510:05, 7 January 2024‎Curbon7talkcontribs‎23,708 bytes−34‎Undid revision 1194125822 byBon courage(talk) contesting not in disagreement, but as unneeded; see talk.Tag:Undo
• curprev09:5809:58, 7 January 2024‎Bon couragetalkcontribs‎23,742 bytes+34‎Restored revision 1194124412 byBilledMammal(talk): If somebody wants to revert this for an actual reason fine, but process-only reverting is badTags:TwinkleUndoReverted
• curprev09:4709:47, 7 January 2024‎Jasper Dengtalkcontribs‎23,708 bytes−34‎Undid revision 1194124412 byBilledMammal(talk) revert good-faith edit that needs to be discussedTags:UndoReverted
• curprev09:4309:43, 7 January 2024‎BilledMammaltalkcontribs‎23,742 bytes+34‎→‎Levels of consensus:To address issue currently seen at AN where a consensus was determined from a discussion on a user talk pageTag:Reverted

22 December 2023

• curprev05:0605:06, 22 December 2023‎Princess Lirintalkcontribs‎23,708 bytes+26‎→‎Achieving consensus:repaired link to dab page (butconsensus decision-makingis also linked in the lead so I'm not sure whether this link is even needed?)

3 October 2023

• curprev03:3003:30, 3 October 2023‎HouseBlastertalkcontribs‎23,682 bytes−51‎WP:CONLEVELShas zero incoming links,WP:LOCALCONSENSUShas 2,000. Unless there is someone who uses CONLEVELS (plural) in edit summaries or off-wiki a bunch, display the more common shortcut

28 September 2023

• curprev15:1415:14, 28 September 2023‎Narky Blerttalkcontribs‎23,733 bytes+26‎Link to DAB page repaired

18 September 2023

• curprev17:0717:07, 18 September 2023‎Jc37talkcontribs‎23,707 bytes+8‎links
• curprev16:5616:56, 18 September 2023‎Jc37talkcontribs‎23,699 bytes−76‎rv - is noted in context, elsewhere on the page

17 September 2023

• curprev23:0823:08, 17 September 2023‎Thinker78talkcontribs‎23,775 bytes+18‎added word for more clarity (some users might give other interpretations to uninvolved, involved)

11 September 2023

• curprev21:5521:55, 11 September 2023‎Coolclawcattalkcontribs‎m23,757 bytes+32‎→‎Decisions not subject to consensus of editors:Fixed wikilink:Arbitration Committeeis a redirect to a disambiguation page in the main namespace;Wikipedia:Arbitration Committeeis probably the intended target

6 September 2023

• curprev06:2006:20, 6 September 2023‎Jc37talkcontribs‎23,725 bytes+7‎not about dominance

5 September 2023

• curprev16:1016:10, 5 September 2023‎Jc37talkcontribs‎23,718 bytes+82‎redirect hatnote

28 August 2023

• curprev00:1400:14, 28 August 2023‎Butwhatdoiknowtalkcontribs‎23,636 bytes−5‎Undid revision 1172402243 byThinker78(talk) nutshells, as I understand them, are supposed to be substantive and as brief as possible / plus, an introduction is a fine place to provide a content listTag:Undo

26 August 2023

• curprev21:3421:34, 26 August 2023‎Thinker78talkcontribs‎23,641 bytes−9‎→‎Through discussion:modified to better reflect outcome
• curprev21:3221:32, 26 August 2023‎Thinker78talkcontribs‎23,650 bytes+15‎→‎Through discussion:added option
• curprev21:2921:29, 26 August 2023‎Thinker78talkcontribs‎23,635 bytes+67‎→‎Through discussion:modified guidance to better reflect current practice, many times not all recognize an outcome as reasonable in discussions (rough consensus taken fromWP:NHC)