2005 Iraqi constitutional referendum
 | This article includes a list of generalreferences,butit lacks sufficient correspondinginline citations.(October 2011) |
 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Results | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
 Results by governorate Yes:50-60%60-70%70-80%90-100% No:50-60%80-90%90-100% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|---|
|
|
| Constitution |
 Iraq portal |
The electorate ofIraqwent to the polls on 15 October 2005 to vote in areferendumon whether or not to ratify the proposedconstitution of Iraq.After 10 days of counting votes, the country's electoral commission announced that the constitution had been approved by a wide margin nationwide. A number of mainly Sunni critics like future deputy prime ministerSaleh al-Mutlaqalleged massive irregularities,[1][2]saying that soldiers broke in to polling stations and changed votes to yes in the crucial province ofNineveh,which was expected by them to provide the third (and deciding) "no" vote.
Background and campaign
[edit]Article 61 of Iraq'sInterim Constitution,in effect since 28 June 2004, laid down the rules for the approval of theproposed permanent constitution.The proposed constitution would have been approved in the referendum if both a majority of voters nationwide voted "yes" and there were no more than 2 of the country's 18governorateswhere two-thirds of the voters voted "no." On 2 October 2005, theNational Assemblyweakened the second requirement such that it would only fail to be fulfilled if two-thirds ofregisteredvoters—rather than actual voters—in three governorates voted "no." Opponents of the Draft Constitution reacted angrily to this reinterpretation of Article 61 of the Interim Constitution. Critics had also pointed out that such an interpretation reads the term "voter" differently in both requirements; the first requirement is still simply fulfilled if a majority of actual voters nationwide votes yes. After much international criticism, the decision was reversed on 5 October.
The possibility of veto by supermajorities of three or more governorates was originally written into the interim constitution to ensure that the permanent constitution would be acceptable to Iraq'sKurdishminority. However, support for the constitution was weakest among Iraq'sSunniArabcommunity, and some observers thought that the Sunni vote would result in the constitution's rejection. While the exact ethnic distribution of the Iraqi population by governorate is unknown, because the country had not had an official census for 15 years, governorates that include substantial Sunni populations includeBaghdad,Al Anbar,Salah ad Din,NinevehandDiyala.In the event, Al Anbar, Saladin, and Nineveh all saw majorities vote against ratification, though the vote in Nineveh did not result in the two-thirds "no" supermajority required to scuttle the constitution.
Conduct
[edit]Voting took place as planned on 15 October. All civilian cars were banned from streets due to heavy security. Attacks against polling stations were reported in Bagdad, with low casualties.[3]Initially, Iraqi election officials had hoped that results of the balloting would be made public by 19 October. On 17 October, however, election officials announced that questions concerning the turnout in some provinces required that the vote be audited, which delayed release of the final figures. A sandstorm in central Iraq has also contributed to the delay. Although Sunni politician Saleh al-Mutlaq has alleged fraud, election monitors from theUnited Nationssaid that the vote "went well."[1]
During this election, security detainees held by coalition forces and the Ministry of Interior were given the opportunity to vote. This is the first time in the modern history of the Middle East that detainees of this nature were allowed to vote in any election.
Results
[edit]On 25 October, Electoral Commission officials released the final results, which indicated that the constitution had been approved. Overall, 79% of voters backed the charter and 21% opposed it. Of 18 governorates, only two recorded "No" votes greater than two thirds—one province short of a veto.
| Choice | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| For | 7,742,796 | 78.59 | |
| Against | 2,109,495 | 21.41 | |
| Total | 9,852,291 | 100.00 | |
| Valid votes | 9,852,291 | 98.00 | |
| Invalid/blank votes | 201,089 | 2.00 | |
| Total votes | 10,053,380 | 100.00 | |
| Registered voters/turnout | 15,568,702 | 64.57 | |
| Source:IFES | |||
By governorate
[edit]| Governorate | Demographics | Votes | % For | % Against |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Baghdad | Capital and surrounding area | 2,120,615 | 77.7 | 22.3 |
| 2Salah ad Din | Sunni Arab majority Claimed partly by, but not yet part of,Kurdistan Autonomous Region |
510,152 | 18.25 | 81.75 |
| 3Diyala | Sunni Arab majority Claimed partly by, but not yet part of,Kurdistan Autonomous Region |
476,980 | 51.27 | 48.73 |
| 4Wasit | Shi'a Arab majority | 280,128 | 95.7 | 4.3 |
| 5Maysan | Shi'a Arab majority | 254,067 | 97.79 | 2.21 |
| 6Al Basrah | Shi'a Arab majority | 691,024 | 96.02 | 3.98 |
| 7Dhi Qar | Shi'a Arab majority | 462,710 | 97.15 | 2.85 |
| 8Al Muthanna | Shi'a Arab majority | 185,710 | 98.65 | 1.35 |
| 9Al Qadisyah | Shi'a Arab majority | 297,176 | 96.74 | 3.32 |
| 10Babil | Shi'a Arab majority | 543,779 | 94.56 | 5.44 |
| 11Al Karbala | Shi'a Arab majority | 264,674 | 96.58 | 3.42 |
| 12An Najaf | Shi'a Arab majority | 299,420 | 95.82 | 4.18 |
| 13Al Anbar | Sunni Arab majority | 259,919 | 3.04 | 96.9 |
| 14Nineveh | Mostly Sunni Arabs Claimed partly by, but not yet part of,Kurdistan Autonomous Region |
718,758 | 44.92 | 55.08 |
| 15Dahuk | Part ofKurdistan Autonomous Region | 389,198 | 99.13 | 0.87 |
| 16Arbil | Part ofKurdistan Autonomous Region | 830,570 | 99.36 | 0.64 |
| 17At Ta'min(now Kirkuk) | Claimed by, but not yet part of,Kurdistan Autonomous Region | 542,688 | 62.91 | 37.09 |
| 18As Sulaymaniyah | Part ofKurdistan Autonomous Region | 723,723 | 98.96 | 1.04 |
| Total | 9,852,291 | 78.59 | 21.41 | |
Aftermath
[edit]With the approval of the constitution, elections for a permanent government must be held no later than 15 December 2005, with the new government assuming office no later than 31 December 2005. If the constitution had been rejected, the National Assembly would have been dissolved, and a new transitional government would have been elected to attempt to write another permanent constitution.
See also
[edit]
References
[edit]- ^abSteele, Jonathan (25 October 2005)."Iraqi constitution yes vote approved by UN".The Guardian.Archivedfrom the original on 2013-08-29.Retrieved6 January2022.
- ^Wong, Edward (23 October 2005)."Iraqi Constitution Vote Split on Ethnic and Sect Lines; Election Panel Reports No Major Fraud".The New York Times.Archivedfrom the original on 2019-10-09.Retrieved6 January2022.
- ^Wong, Edward (15 October 2005)."Iraqis Vote on New Constitution".The New York Times.Archivedfrom the original on 2015-05-29.Retrieved6 January2022.
External links
[edit]- Iraq's Sunnis Register to Vote in Droves(The Washington Post,8 September 2005)
- UN condemns Iraq charter change(BBC News,4 October 2005)
- Iraqis vote on new constitution; few attacksReutersOctober 15, 2005
- The Iraqi Constitution: What Would Approval Really Mean?JURIST
- Iraq Charter Seems Assured of ApprovalAssociated PressOctober 16, 2005
- Iraq result delay over fraud fearBBCOctober 17, 2005
- Iraq voters back new constitutionBBCOctober 25, 2005
- Soldier's firsthand photo essay of Baghdad's Referendum Vote on October 15thby Matthew Vea
- Iraq's Constitutional Process II: An Opportunity LostU.S. Institute of PeaceSpecial Report, December 2005
