Abhizeet Asom
Abhizeet Asom | |
|---|---|
| Born | Mukul Hazarika |
| Other names | Abhizeet Asom |
| Citizenship | British |
| Organization | ULFA (I) |
| Known for | Chairperson of the ULFA (I) |
| Movement | Sovereignty of Asom |
| Opponent | IndianState |
Abhizeet Bormoncommonly known by hisaliasAbhizeet Asom(Assamese:অভিজিত অসম), is thechairpersonof theUnited Liberation Front of Assam (Independent).[1]
Role as ULFA leader
[edit]In the 1990s, he chaperoned the organisation's leaders in a number ofUnited Nations's (U.N.) convocations atGeneva.He is believed to be the brain behind the undeterred conference at the U.N. subsequent to theOperation All Clear,which was being strongly opposed by thegovernment of India.[2]
Asom had been working as theacting chairmanof theUnited Liberation Front of AssamsinceArabinda Rajkhowa's decision to hold talks with the government of India,[3]and was later designated as the chairperson of the organisation on 8 August 2012, following the expulsion of Rajkhowa from all the assigned ranks of the ULFA by the organisation.[4]The ULFA stated that Rajkhowa was ousted because of his unresponsive behaviour regarding the three-monthultimatumgiven by the organisation[4]on 29 April 2012.[5]Earlier,Paresh Baruah,who is leading the "anti-talk faction" of the ULFA, had issued three monthsdeadlineto the "pro-talk faction" to "break talks with the government and return to the outfit", depicting the series of discussions held between the "pro-talk faction" of the ULFA and the government of India as "a sell-out by Ulfa chairman Arabinda Rajkhowa and other leaders."[6]The "anti-talk faction" said:
The ULFA as a whole is very humbly requesting our Chairman to return to lead the organisation breaking free of Indian control within three months of issuance of this call. Otherwise, the vacant Chair will have to be filled by the constitutional process empowered to the office bearers and members of the unbound (anti-talk faction) ULFA at the end of the above deadline.[7]
Baruah says that the "demand for [Assam's]sovereigntydoes not meansecession"but disapproves parleying with the Indian government unless the agenda of sovereignty forAssamis addressed.[6]But, Rajkhowa claims that the newly formed central committee of the ULFA is not in accordance with the organisation's constitution and sees himself as the organisation's chairperson, and the Indian government also view the "Rajkhowa faction" as the organisation's sole representative.[3]In November 2012,Dainik Jagrandescribed Asom as the chairperson of the "anti-talk faction" of the organisation.[8]Asom, however, had said:
The honourable chairman of Ulfa, along with the senior office-bearers of the central committee under Indian custody, is having a dialogue with the Indian establishment to achieve an honourable solution to the issue raised by Ulfa. The restoration of sovereign Assam is the honourable solution and there cannot be any other alternative. Hence, the free members of the Ulfa decided to reorganize the central committee to enable us to continue with the struggle to its avowed conclusion.[3]
Asom maintains that the ULFA will not back down from the ambition of achieving sovereignty for Assam, and says that the people still have confidence in the organisation by pointing towards the recruitment in the ULFA.[8]
Before being instated as the acting chairperson of the ULFA, his identity was known only toAnup Chetia,Arabinda Rajkhowa, and Paresh Baruah. And, his candidature for the role of the acting chairperson of the organisation left the government of India, theIndian Army,and thenews mediain a state of bewilderment.[2]In May 2013,NE TVandNews Time Assamaired a video of theLondonbased medical practitioner Mukul Hazarika, in which he can be seen addressing anassemblage at Geneva held on the subject of "human rights",speaking on "the armed conflict in the NE [north-eastern India] region". The news channels reported that the person in the video is none other than Asom, however, theAdditional Director General of PoliceKhagen Sarma said that while they are aware that Hazarika had maintained links with the ULFA leaders, they are not sure yet that whether he and Asom is the same individual.[9]Hazarika is also known in the U.K. for addressing the subject of "human rights",[9]and bringing the demand of Assam's sovereignty to the fore.[2]
Asom also issued a statement to thepresson the demise ofKishenji.He said that Kishenji was a person "who has given his life in pursuit of the betterment of the marginalised bottom strata of Indiancitizenry."[10]
On negotiations with Indian government
[edit]Asom, as the chairperson of the ULFA, has putcondiciones sine quibus nonbefore the government of India if it is willing to initiate a dialogue with the organisation, which are:[11]
- "that the negotiations will be held on third country soil."
- "that the talks will be under the auspices of the United Nations."
- "and that these discussions with the government of India must include their demand for sovereignty."
However, he also says that the prime objective of the ULFA is certainly not the secession of Assam from India, but the sovereignty of Assam. In Asom's words:
....we don't expect Assam to break away. We expect India to restore Assam's historical independent status and gracefully return our sovereignty, which was stolen from us. And be a friendly next door. On that basis, we will then negotiate other things without any qualms. As we said we don't want to be enemies of the state of India. We can negotiate with India in the area of economics, development and progress. And the progress of India will be an example to the people of Assam to march ahead and try to match the progress of India. So that Assam can also do better.[11]
On alleged links with foreign intelligence agencies
[edit]Asom rebutes the allegation that the ULFA have ties with theDirectorate General of Forces Intelligenceor theInter-Services Intelligence,but added they are "acutely aware of who is what. For the cause of Assam's sovereignty we [ULFA's members] can consider using them advantageously.... But, we cannot allow them to use us."[12]
Theintelligence agencies of Indiaaccuse the ULFA of having inordinate alliance with China,[13]but the organisation as well as theChinese Foreign Ministrydeny the allegation.[14]
Other activities and interests
[edit]Asom has shown interest towardswildlife conservation.He has alleged that theDepartment of Environment and Forests, Government of Assamis involved in the killings ofRhinosfor theirhorns,and appreciated the NGONature's Beaconfor publicly raising the issue of the death of a Rhino on 25 March 2012, who died as a result of the assault by people, after the animal was let off openly theDepartment of Environment and Forestsafter cutting its horns. He suggested that the department should consider taking assistance from the eminent wildlife conservationists like John Hume.[15]He further said:
....a transparentmethodologyof storing Rhino horns should be adopted and therevenueearned from it legally should be used for conservation efforts of thefaunain Assam.[15]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^Vijay Chutia (7 May 2013)."Times of Assam hit by Plagiarism of NETV – Shame on Assamese media".Times of Assam.Retrieved29 October2013.
- ^abc"Face of ULFA Acting Chairman Revealed".Times of Assam. 2 December 2011.Retrieved1 November2013.
- ^abc"Ulfa acting chairman calls for amendments to Constitution".The Times of India.Guwahati. 26 November 2011. Archived fromthe originalon 4 November 2013.Retrieved4 November2013.
- ^ab"ULFA expells [sic] Arabinda Rajkhowa, introduces new chairman ".Times of Assam.8 August 2012.Retrieved29 October2013.
- ^"Ulfa splits formally, Rajkhowa 'expelled'".The Times of India.Guwahati. 9 August 2012. Archived fromthe originalon 4 November 2013.Retrieved4 November2013.
- ^abSyed Nazakat (5 May 2012),Slow and not steady,The Week,retrieved29 October2013
- ^"ULFA gives its Chairman 3-month ultimatum to rejoin".Dainik Jagran.Guwahati. 29 April 2012.Retrieved6 November2013.
- ^ab"Tight security on ULFA's Protest Day in Assam".Dainik Jagran.Guwahati. 28 November 2012.Retrieved6 November2013.
- ^ab"Ulfa(I) chairman in London: TV channels".The Times of India.Guwahati. 7 May 2013. Archived fromthe originalon 4 June 2013.Retrieved14 November2013.
- ^"Paresh Baruah extends moral support to Maoists".The Times of India.Guwahati. 10 May 2010. Archived fromthe originalon 1 November 2013.Retrieved29 October2013.
- ^ab"ULFA chairman does not deny links with Bangladesh, Pak and Chinese intelligence agencies".Manoranjana Sinh.Frontier TV. Archived fromthe originalon 19 November 2013.Retrieved19 November2013.
- ^Samir Purkayastha (8 August 2013),ULFA denies DGFI, ISI links,Bdnews24.com,retrieved19 November2013
- ^"Indian nuclear bases in Assam to combat China – ULFA".Times of Assam.26 March 2012.Retrieved19 November2013.
ULFA and other rebel groups of North East are being reported to have been maintaining close relationship with China according to Indian intelligence. However Beijing has been denying such reports.
- ^"ULFA rubbishes ex-home secy claim of China aiding NE rebels".Imphal Free Press.Guwahati: Kangla. 17 February 2011.Retrieved18 November2013.
- ^ab"ULFA Acting Chairman turns Wildlife Conservationist".Times of Assam.29 March 2012.Retrieved30 October2013.