Actio iniuriarum
![]() | This article has multiple issues.Please helpimprove itor discuss these issues on thetalk page.(Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
|
Theactio iniuriarumis an action fordelictwhich "not only seeks to protect an individual'sdignityandreputationbut also his or her physical integrity. "[1]
Harm or loss
[edit]The harm or loss which gives rise to theactio iniuriarumis a violation of a personality interest, usually classified, as per the definition above, under the following three headings:
- corpus,or bodily integrity;
- dignitas,or dignity; and
- fama,or reputation.[2]
Conduct
[edit]The delictual conduct required for a successful application of the action comes usually in the form of statements or positive conduct. Seldom is it an omission.[3]
Causation
[edit]Causation is normally not an issue in respect of theactio iniuriarum,but it may become one in some instances, as in deprivation-of-liberty cases.[4]
Wrongfulness
[edit]Conduct will be wrongful in terms of this action if it is objectively unreasonable and without lawful justification: "Having a valid defence means that the conduct is justified and the behaviour is not wrongful or unlawful."[5]
Fault
[edit]There must be fault in the form of intention, although this is controversial, as some inSouth Africacontend that the action has developed in the last century to include some instances, such as those involving deprivation of liberty, where liability is strict, and others such as defamation involving the media, where liability is negligence-based.[6]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- JM BurchellPrinciples of delict(1993).
- M Loubser (ed)The Law of Delict in South Africa(2010).
Notes
[edit]