Jump to content

Cheirolepidiaceae

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cheirolepidiaceae
Temporal range:Late TriassicPaleocene
Leafy shoot ofTomaxelliashowing details of epidermis and stomata
Scientific classificationEdit this classification
Kingdom: Plantae
Clade: Tracheophytes
Clade: Gymnospermae
Division: Pinophyta
Class: Pinopsida
Order: Pinales
Family: Cheirolepidiaceae
Turutanova-Ketova 1963
Genera
  • See text
Synonyms
  • Hirmeriellaceae

Cheirolepidiaceae(also spelledCheirolepidaceae) is an extinctfamilyofconifers.They first appeared in theTriassic,and were a diverse and common group of conifers during most of theMesozoicera, primarily at low latitudes,[1]where they often formed a dominant element of the vegetation.[2]They are united by the possession of a distinctive pollen type assigned to the form genusClassopollis(the distinctive characters of which include "distal cryptopore, proximal scar often with filaments, striate equatorial girdle, subequatorial rimula, tegillum (outer tectum of a lesser electron density), and columella-like infratectal elements"[2]) The name Frenelopsidaceae (as a separate family) or "frenelopsids" has been used for a group of Cheirolepidiaceae with jointed stems, thick internode cuticles, sheathing leaf bases and reduced free leaf tips. The leaf morphology has been noted as being similar to that ofhalophyteSalicornia.Several members of the family appear to have been adapted for semi-arid and coastal settings, with a high tolerance of saline conditions.[3]Cheirolepidiaceae disappeared from most regions of the world during theCenomanian-Turonianstages of theLate Cretaceous,but reappeared in South America during theMaastrichtian,the final stage of the Cretaceous, increasing in abundance after theK-Pg extinctionand being a prominent part of the regional flora during thePaleocene,before going extinct.[4]Survival into the Paleocene in North America and China has also been suggested based on pollen.[1]

Pararaucariacone

The habit of cheirolepidaceous confers is likely to have varied widely, from large trees (some with trunks over 3 metres (9.8 ft) thick at their base) to shrubs.[5][6]Theirarchitectureis poorly known, though some are thought to have haddecurrentspreadingcrowns,while others had conical crowns. Many seem to have plagiotropic lateral branches that developed in whorls.[6]

The relationships of Cheirolepidiaceae to other conifers are uncertain. A close relationship withAraucariaceaeandPodocarpaceaehas been proposed, based on the similarities of their reproductive structures,[7]though other studies have suggested that they may fall outside thecrown groupof modern conifers among variousvoltzialeanlineages.[8]

At least some species of Cheirolepidiaceae have been suggested to have been pollinated by insects, due to the construction of the reproductive organs and the fact that insects have been found associated withClassopolispollen grains.[9][10]

The family nameHirmeriellaceaeis a junior synonym of Cheirolepidiaceae.[11]Some authors have suggested Hirmeriellaceae is the valid name for the family, due to nomenclatural issues with the originalCheirolepisgenus, which is a junior homonym of a member ofAsteraceae,withCheirolepidiumsuggested to be an invalid replacement. Both genera are likely synonyms ofHirmeriella.[12]

Genera[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^abSmith, Vann; Hessler, Angela; Moscardelli, Lorena; Bord, David; Olariu, Iulia; Lorente, Maria Antonieta; Sivil, Evan; Liu, Xiuju (2024-04-01)."A late refugium for Classopollis in the Paleocene Lower Wilcox Group along the Texas Gulf Coast".Geology.52(4): 251–255.doi:10.1130/G51772.1.ISSN0091-7613.
  2. ^abKvaček, Jiří; Mendes, Mário Miguel; Tekleva, Maria (October 2023)."A new cheirolepidiaceous microsporangiate cone Classostrobus archangelskyi with in situ pollen from the Lower Cretaceous of Figueira da Foz Formation, central-western mainland Portugal".Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology.317:104951.doi:10.1016/j.revpalbo.2023.104951.
  3. ^Escapa, Ignacio; Leslie, Andrew (2017)."A new Cheirolepidiaceae (Coniferales) from the Early Jurassic of Patagonia (Argentina): Reconciling the records of impression and permineralized fossils".American Journal of Botany.104(2): 322–334.doi:10.3732/ajb.1600321.hdl:11336/40738.ISSN1537-2197.PMID28213347.
  4. ^Barreda, Viviana D.; Cúneo, Nestor R.; Wilf, Peter; Currano, Ellen D.; Scasso, Roberto A.; Brinkhuis, Henk (2012-12-17). Newsom, Lee A. (ed.)."Cretaceous/Paleogene Floral Turnover in Patagonia: Drop in Diversity, Low Extinction, and a Classopollis Spike".PLOS ONE.7(12): e52455.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052455.ISSN1932-6203.PMC3524134.PMID23285049.
  5. ^Taylor, T (2009),"Conifers",Biology and Evolution of Fossil Plants,Elsevier, pp. 805–871,doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-373972-8.00021-8,ISBN978-0-12-373972-8,retrieved2023-02-08
  6. ^abSteart, David C.; Needham, John; Strullu-Derrien, Christine; Philippe, Marc; Krieger, Jonathan; Stevens, Lil; Spencer, Alan R. T.; Hayes, Peta A.; Kenrick, Paul (2023-04-12)."New evidence of the architecture and affinity of fossil trees from the Jurassic Purbeck Forest of southern England".Botany Letters:1–18.doi:10.1080/23818107.2023.2197973.ISSN2381-8107.
  7. ^Jin, Peihong; Zhang, Mingzhen; Du, Baoxia; Li, Aijing; Sun, Bainian (February 2023)."A new species of Pararaucaria from the Lower Cretaceous of Shandong province (Eastern China): Insights into the Evolution of the Cheirolepidiaceae cone".Cretaceous Research:105475.doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2023.105475.
  8. ^Andruchow-Colombo, Ana; Escapa, Ignacio H; Aagesen, Lone; Matsunaga, Kelly K S (2023-08-04)."In search of lost time: tracing the fossil diversity of Podocarpaceae through the ages".Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society.doi:10.1093/botlinnean/boad027.hdl:11336/227952.ISSN0024-4074.
  9. ^Ren D, Labandeira CC, Santiago-Blay JA, Rasnitsyn A, Shih CK, Bashkuev A, Logan MA, Hotton CL, Dilcher D. (2009). Probable Pollination Mode Before Angiosperms: Eurasian, Long-Proboscid Scorpionflies. Science, 326 (5954), 840-847.doi:10.1126/science.1178338
  10. ^Peñalver, Enrique; Arillo, Antonio; Pérez-de la Fuente, Ricardo; Riccio, Mark L.; Delclòs, Xavier; Barrón, Eduardo; Grimaldi, David A. (July 2015)."Long-Proboscid Flies as Pollinators of Cretaceous Gymnosperms".Current Biology.25(14): 1917–1923.doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.062.
  11. ^Herendeen, P., 2015. Report of the nomenclature committee on fossils. 9. Taxon (64) 6: 1306-1312
  12. ^Doweld, Alexander B. (October 2020)."The controversial nomenclature of the fossil plant names Cheirolepis, Cheirolepidium and Hirmeriella (Cheirolepidaceae/Cheirolepidiaceae/Hirmeriellaceae)".Taxon.69(5): 1092–1098.doi:10.1002/tax.12287.ISSN0040-0262.S2CID225425644.