Cleft sentence
Acleft sentenceis acomplex sentence(one having a main clause and adependent clause) that has a meaning that could be expressed by asimple sentence.Clefts typically put a particularconstituentintofocus.Inspoken language,this focusing is often accompanied by a specialintonation.
InEnglish,a cleft sentence can be constructed as follows:
- it+ conjugated form ofto be+X+ subordinate clause
whereitis a cleft pronoun andXis usually anoun phrase(although it can also be aprepositional phrase,and in some cases an adjectival or adverbial phrase). The focus is onX,or else on the subordinate clause or some element of it. For example:
- It's Joey (whom) we're looking for.
- It's money that I love.
- It was from John that she heard the news.
Furthermore, one might also describe a cleft sentence as inverted. That is to say, it has its dependent clause in front of the main clause. So, rather than: Example:
- We didn't meet her until we arrived at the hotel.
the cleft would be:
- It wasn't until we arrived at the hotel that(orwhen)we met her.
Types[edit]
English is very rich in cleft constructions. Below are examples of some types of clefts found in English, though the list is not exhaustive. See Lambrecht 2001 for a comprehensive survey, Collins 1991 for an in-depth analysis of it-clefts and wh-clefts in English, and Calude 2009 for an investigation of clefts in spoken English.
It-cleft[edit]
In English, it-clefts consist of the pronounit,followed by a form of the verbto be,a cleft constituent, and a complementizer, which introduces a relative clause that is attributed to the cleft phrase.[1]It-clefts introduce two meanings parts: (1) a presupposition that the property in the clause following the complementiser holds of some entity; and (ii) an assertion that this property holds of the entity denoted by the cleft constituent.[1]
- English it-cleft:It was John that Mary saw.[2]
Wh-cleft/Pseudo-cleft[edit]
In English, pseudo-clefts consist of an interrogative clause in the subject position, followed by a form of the verbbe,followed by the focused element that appears at the end of the sentence.[3]The prototypical pseudo-cleft construction useswhat,while otherwh-wordslikewho,whereetc. and theirpro-formequivalents likething,one,placeetc. are used less frequently.[4]Pseudo-clefts are tools for presenting and highlighting new information, serving as the building blocks of a coherent discourse progression, and a rhetorical toolkit to construct an authorial stance, being a grammatical resource for making evaluative meaning.[vague][5]
- English wh-cleft/pseudo-cleft:What Mary bought was a first edition.[3]
Reversed wh-cleft/Inverted pseudo-cleft[edit]
In English, an inverted pseudo-cleft consists of the identical structure to pseudoclefting, however, the two strings around the verbbeare inverted.[3]The focus element has been brought to the front of the sentence, and the clause is sentence final.[6]
- English reversed wh-cleft/inverted pseudo-cleft:
All-cleft[edit]
In English, all-cleft sentences are related to pseudo-clefts in which they are constructed with the subject of the sentence embedded in the phrase and expressed with the verb "to be".[8]Where pseudo-clefts begin with a wh-phrase (what,where,who), all-clefts begin with the use of the word "all".[8]
- Englishall-cleft:
Inferential cleft[edit]
In English, inferential clefts involve a subordinate clause that is embedded as a complement of the verb "to be", and the sentence begins with the subject "it".[10]Oftentimes, an inferential cleft will include an adverb such asonly,simplyorjust.[10]While they are analyzed in written text, data on inferential clefts are often found in spoken language and act as a subordinate clause of the subject they are inferring.[11]
- English inferential cleft:
Inferential Cleft sentence: "It was just that it was raining."
- It is not that he loves her. It's just that he has a way with her that is different.[9]
- It was just that it was raining.[10]
There-cleft[edit]
Looking at existential sentences, in all languages, they are understood to belong to a grammatically distinct construction, which is utilized to express existential positions. Cleft-sentences in English contain existential sentences that have adummy thereas a subject,beas a main verb, and an NP in the post-verbal complement position. To elaborate,dummy therecan be distinguished as an adverbial, pronoun, and subject. Likewise,becan be distinguished as a main verb, and may contain other intransitive verbs such ascome,remain,exist,arise,andstand.Lastly,post-verbal NPdepends on the discourse of the entity or entities that refer to the novel information it is expressing.[12]
- English dummythere-cleft:
- Englishbe there-cleft:There comes a stage when a player should move on.[12]
- English post-verbal NPthere-cleft:There was George Talbot and there was Ted.[12]
- Englishthere-cleft:And then there's a new house he wanted to build.[13]
If-because cleft[edit]
Traditional accounts of cleft structures classify these according to the elements involved following English-centric analyses (such aswh-words,thepronounit,thequantifierall,and so on). This makes it difficult to conduct cross-linguistic investigations of clefts since these elements do not exist in all other languages, which has led to a proposal for a revision of existing cleft taxonomy (see Calude 2009).
However, not all languages are so rich in cleft types as English, and some employ other means for focusing specific constituents, such astopicalization,word orderchanges,focusing particlesand so on (see Miller 1996).Cleftability in Language(2009) by Cheng Luo presents a cross-linguistic discussion of cleftability.
- Englishif-becausecleft:If he wants to be an actor it's because he wants to be famous.[9]
Structural issues[edit]
The role of the cleft pronoun (itin the case of English) is controversial, and some believe it to be referential,[14]while others treat it as adummy pronounor empty element.[15]The former analysis has come to be termed the "expletive" view, whereas the latter is referred to as the "extraposition" approach. Hedberg (2002) proposes a hybrid approach, combining ideas from both takes on the status of the cleft pronoun. She shows that it can have a range of scopes (from semantically void to full reference) depending on the context in which it is used.
Similarly controversial is the status of the subordinate clause, often termed the "cleft clause". While most would agree that the cleft clause in wh-clefts can be analysed as some kind ofrelative clause(free or fused or headless), there is disagreement as to the exact nature of the relative. Traditionally, the wh-word in a cleft such asWhat you need is a good holiday,pertaining to the relativeWhat you need,is understood to be the firstconstituentof the relative clause, and to function as itshead.
Bresnan and Grimshaw (1978) posit a different analysis. They suggest that the relative clause is headed (rather than headless), with wh-word being located outside the clause proper and functioning as its head. Miller (1996) also endorses this approach, citing cross-linguistic evidence that the wh-word functions as indefinitedeictics.
The cleft clause debate gets more complex with it-clefts, where researchers struggle to even agree as to the type of clause that is involved: the traditionalists claim it to be a relative clause (Huddleston and Pullum 2002), while others reject this on the basis of a lack of noun phrase antecedent (Quirk et al. 1985, Sornicola 1988, Miller 1999), as exemplified below:
- It was because he was ill that we decided to return.
- It was in September that he first found out about it.
- It was with great reluctance that Maria accepted the invitation.
Finally, the last element of a cleft is the cleft constituent, which typically corresponds to the focus. As mentioned earlier, the focused part of a cleft is typically a noun phrase, but may in fact, turn up to be just about anything:[16]
- Prepositional phrase:It wason footthat he went there.
- Adverbial phrase:It wasgreedily and speedilythat Homer Simpson drank his beer.
- Non-finite clause:It isto address a far-reaching problemthat Oxfam is launching this campaign.
- Gerund:It could begoing home earlyor slacking off at work that the boss reacted to.
- Adverbial clause:It wasbecause she was so lonely all the timethat she decided to move out.
Information structure[edit]
Clefts have been described as "equative" (Halliday 1976), "stative" (Delin and Oberlander 1995) and as "variable-value pairs", where the cleft constituent gives a variable expressed by the cleft clause (Herriman 2004, Declerck 1994, Halliday 1994). A major area of interest with regard to cleft constructions involves their information structure. The concept of "information structure" relates to the type of information encoded in a particular utterance, that can be one of these three:
- NEW information: things that the speaker/writer expects their hearer/reader might not already know
- GIVEN information: information that the speaker/writer expects the hearer/reader may be familiar with
- INFERRABLE information: information that the speaker/writer may expect the hearer/reader to be able to infer either from world knowledge, or from previous discourse
The reason why information structure plays such an important role in the area of clefts is largely due to the fact that the organisation of information structure is tightly linked to the clefts' function as focusing tools used by speakers/writers to draw attention to salient parts of their message.
While it may be reasonable to assume that the variable of a cleft (that is, the material encoded by cleft clauses) may be typically GIVEN and its value (expressed by the cleft constituent) is NEW, it is not always so. Sometimes, neither element contains new information, as is in some demonstrative clefts, e.g.,That is what I thinkand sometimes it is the cleft clause that contains the NEW part of the message, as inAnd that's when I got sick(Calude 2009). Finally, in some constructions, it is the equation between cleft clause and cleft constituent that brings about the newsworthy information, rather than any of the elements of the cleft themselves (Lambrecht 2001).
Other languages[edit]
Mandarin[edit]
Theshì...deconstruction in Mandarin is used to produce the equivalent of cleft sentences. However, in traditional grammar,shì...declefts were seen as a construction with a function in reference to the construction as a whole. Bothshì,the copula, anddecan occur in other contexts that express information-structural categories, but they are sometimes hard to distinguish fromshì...declefts.[17]In addition, certain constructions with relative clauses have been referred to as "pseudo-cleft" constructions. SeeChinese grammar § Cleft sentencesfor details.
Examples:[17]
Zhāngsān
Zhangsan
shì
COP
zuótiān
yesterday
lái-de.
come-DE
"It was yesterday that Zhangsan came."
Zhāngsān
Zhangsan
shì
COP
míngtiān
tomorrow
lái.
come
"Concerning Zhangsan, it is the case that he will come tomorrow."
Zhāngsān
Zhangsan
zuótiān
yesterday
lái-de.
come-DE
"It was yesterday that Zhangsan came."
Spanish[edit]
There exist several constructions which play the role of cleft sentences. A very common resource is the adding of "es que" (time-dependent). Similar to English cleft sentences, time-dependent cleft constructions in Spanish also share a temporal relationship between the verb of the relative clause and the copula.[18]
¿Cómo
how
es
is.PRS-3sg
que
that
vas?
go.PRS.PROG-2sg
"How is it that you're going?"
¿Adónde
Where
fue
is.PST-3sg
que
that
fuiste?
go.PST-2sg
"Where is it that you went?"
From uncleft¿Adónde fuiste?
Another mechanism is the use of the identificating structure, or relative pronouns, "el/la que", "el/la cual" as well as the neuters: "lo que" and "lo cual". This form of cleft construction highlights an importance between the entity and the number and gender of said entity that is uttered in a cleft sentence.[18]
El
He
que
that
va
go.PRS-3sg
es
is.PRS-sg
Juan
Juan
"Who's going is John."
Lo
It.M
que
that
no
NEG
quiero
want.PRS-1sg
es
is.PRS-3sg
ir
go.INF
"What I don't want is to go."
Possible uncleft variants:No quiero ir,Ir no quiero
Furthermore, one can also utilize "cuando" and "donde" when one wants to refer to "that" in a frame of time or place.
Fue
Is.PST-3sg
en
in
Londres
London
donde
where
nací
born.PST-1sg
"It was in London that I was born."
"Fue en Londres donde nací"(It was in London that I was born), possible uncleft variantsNací en Londres
French[edit]
In French, when a cleft is used to reply to a wh-question, it can either appear in a complete form:Matrix 'C'est XP' + relative clause 'que/qui YP'or in a reduced one,Matrix 'C'est XP'.
Example:
- "C'est Jean que je cherche"(It's Jean whom I'm looking for)
- "C'est à Paris que j'habite"(It's in Paris where I live)
Example with Gloss:[19]
Cleft sentences are the most natural way to answer a wh-question in French.[19]For example, if one were to ask:
a.
Qui
Who
est
is-PRS-3SG
ce
it-SG
qui
that
a
3.SG
mangé
ate-3SG.PST
un
a.M
biscuit?
biscuit-NOM.SG?
Who ate a cookie?
It would be answered with the following it-cleft:
b.
C’
It
est
is-PRS.3SG
Ella
Ella
qui
that
a
3SG
mangé
ate-3SG.PST
un
a.M
biscuit
cookie-NOM.SG
"It is Ella that ate a cookie"
Japanese[edit]
TheX no wa (ga)construction in Japanese is frequently used to produce the equivalent of cleft sentences. In addition, a gap precedes its filler in bothsubject cleft (SC) constructionsandobject cleft (OC) constructions.Japanese speakers have reported that there is an object gap preference in Japanese cleft constructions due to temporal structural ambiguities in subject clefts.[20]
Example:[21]
Watashitachi
We
ga
NOM
sagashite
look.for
iru
PRES
no
C
wa
TOP
Joey
Joey
da.
COP
"It's Joey whom we're looking for."
Example of a subject cleft construction:[20]
Kyonen
Last year
<gap>
sobo-o
grandma-ACC
inaka-de
village-LOC
kaihoushita-nowa
nursed-NOWA
shinseki-da-to
relative-COP-COMP
haha-ga
mother-NOM
it-ta.
say-PAST
"Mother said it is the relative who nursed my grandmother last year at the village."
Example of an object cleft construction:[20]
Kyonen
Last year
sobo-ga
Grandma-NOM
<gap>
inaka-de
village-LOC
kaihoushita-nowa
nursed-NOWA
shinseki-da-to
relative-COP-COMP
haha-ga
mother-NOM
it-ta.
say-PAST
"Mother said it is the relative whom my grandmother nursed last year at the village."
Goidelic languages[edit]
The construction is frequent in theGoidelic languages(Scottish Gaelic,Irish,andManx), much more so than in English, and can be used in ways that would be ambiguous or ungrammatical in English: almost any element of a sentence can be clefted. This sometimes carries over into the local varieties of English (Highland English,Lowland Scots,Scottish English,Hiberno-English).
The following examples from Scottish Gaelic are based on the sentence"Chuala Iain an ceòl a-raoir","Iain heard the music last night":
- ’S e Iain a chuala an ceòl a-raoir( "It's Iain who heard the music last night"e.g. as opposed to Mary)
- ’S e an ceòl a chuala Iain a-raoir( "It's the music that Iain heard last night"e.g. as opposed to the speech)
- ’S ann a-raoir a chuala Iain an ceòl( "It's last night that Iain heard the music"e.g. as opposed to last week)
- ’S ann a chuala Iain an ceòl a-raoir( "It's heard that Iain the music last night"e.g. as opposed to making the music)
Tagalog[edit]
Cleft sentences arecopulaconstructions in which thefocusedelement serves as thepredicateof the sentence.
Ang
NOM
babae
woman
ang
NOM
bumili
ACT.bought
ng
ACC
bahay.
house
"The (one who) bought the house was the woman."
Si
NOM
Juan
Juan
ang
NOM
binigyan
gave.PASS
ni
GEN
Pedro
Pedro
ng
ACC
pera.
money
"The (one to whom) Pedro had given money was Juan."
(or: "The (one who) was given money to by Pedro was Juan." )
In the examples in (1) and (2), the foci are inbold.The remaining portions of the cleft sentences in (1) and (2) are noun phrases that contain headlessrelative clauses.(NB: Tagalog does not have an overt copula.)
This construction is also used forWH-questionsin Tagalog, when theWH-wordused in the question is eithersino"who" orano"what", as illustrated in (3) and (4).
Sino
who.NOM
ang
NOM
bumili
ACT.bought
ng
ACC
bahay?
house
"Who bought the house?"
(or: "Who was the (one who) bought the house?" )
Ano
what
ang
NOM
ibinigay
gave.PASS
ni
GEN
Pedro
Pedro
kay
DAT
Juan?
Juan
"What did Pedro give to Juan?"
(or: "What was the (thing that) was given to Juan by Pedro?" )
Notes[edit]
- ^abBevacqua, Luca; Scheffler, Tatjana (2020-01-01)."Form variation of pronominal it-clefts in written English".Linguistics Vanguard.6(1).doi:10.1515/lingvan-2019-0066.ISSN2199-174X.S2CID230284069.
Text was copied from this source, which is available under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- ^Reeve, Matthew (2011-01-01)."The syntactic structure of English clefts".Lingua.121(2): 142–171.doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2010.05.004.ISSN0024-3841.
- ^abcdSportiche, Dominique.An introduction to syntactic analysis and theory.ISBN978-1-118-47048-0.OCLC861536792.
- ^Collins, Peter Craig (2002) [1991].Cleft and Pseudo-Cleft Constructions in English(1st ed.). London: Routledge. p. 27–28.ISBN978-0203202463.
Frequencies for the different relative clause types in the corpus are presented in Table 3.1, which shows that the prototypical pseudo-cleft with relative clause introduced bywhatis statistically dominant, and that the fused-type is almost three times as common as the lexically-headed type.
- ^Zhou, Hui; Chen, Ming (2021-05-28)."What Still Needs to be Noted: Pseudo-Clefts in the Academic Discourse of Applied Linguistics".Frontiers in Psychology.12:672349.doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672349.ISSN1664-1078.PMC8194822.PMID34122267.
- ^Akmajian, Adrian (1970)."On Deriving Cleft Sentences from Pseudo-Cleft Sentences".Linguistic Inquiry.1(2): 149–168.ISSN0024-3892.JSTOR4177550.
- ^Irgin, Pelin (Oct 2013)."A Difficulty Analysis of Cleft Sentences".International Online Journal of Education & Teaching.1(1).RetrievedApril 20,2022.
- ^abcBONELLI, ELENA TOGNINI (1992-01-01)."'All I'm Saying Is…': The Correlation of Form and Function in Pseudo-cleft Sentences ".Literary and Linguistic Computing.7(1): 30–42.doi:10.1093/llc/7.1.30.ISSN0268-1145.
- ^abcPelin, Irgin (Oct 2013)."A Difficulty Analysis of Cleft Sentences".International Online Journal of Education & Teaching.1(1).RetrievedApril 20,2022.
- ^abcDelahunty, Gerald P. (1995)."The Inferential Reconstruction"(PDF).Pragmatics.5(3): 341–364.doi:10.1075/prag.5.3.03del.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 21 March 2020.Retrieved13 April2022.
- ^Calude, Andreea S.; Delahunty, Gerald P. (2011-09-01)."Inferentials in spoken English".Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association.21(3): 307–340.doi:10.1075/prag.21.3.02cal.hdl:10289/8007.ISSN1018-2101.
- ^abcdeCollins, Peter (October 1992)."Cleft existential in English".Language Sciences.14(4): 419–433.doi:10.1016/0388-0001(92)90024-9.RetrievedApril 16,2022.
- ^Irgin, Pelin (October 2013)."A difficulty Analysis of Cleft Sentences".International Online Journal of Education & Teaching.1(1).RetrievedApril 17,2022.
- ^Akmajian 1970, Bolinger 1972, Edmonds 1976, Gundel 1977 and Borkin 1984
- ^Chomsky 1977, Delin 1989, Delahunty 1982, Heggie 1988, Kiss 1998, Lambrecht 2001
- ^Huddleston and Pullum 2002 provide a comprehensive survey
- ^abHole, Daniel (September 2011)."The deconstruction of Chinese shì...de clefts revisited".Lingua.121(11): 1707–1733.doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2011.07.004.RetrievedApril 17,2022.
- ^abPlaza de la Ossa, Myriam (2008). "Efectos de concordancia en las oraciones escindidas del español".Dicenda.26:193–218.
- ^abHamlaoui, Fatima (2007)."FRENCH CLEFT SENTENCES AND THE SYNTAX-PHONOLOGY INTERFACE"(PDF).University of Toronto:11.
- ^abcSakamoto, Tsutomu; Tateyama, Yuki; Yano, Masataka (2014)."Processing of Japanese Cleft Constructions in Context: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials".Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.44(3): 277–286.doi:10.1007/s10936-014-9294-6.PMID24652069.S2CID207201749.RetrievedApril 17,2022.
- ^Hiraiwa, Ken; Ishihara, Shinichiro (June 2012)."Syntactic Metamorphosis: Clefts, Sluicing, and In-Situ Focus in Japanese".Syntax.15(2): 142–180.doi:10.1111/j.1467-9612.2011.00164.x.RetrievedApril 21,2022.
References[edit]
- Akmajian, A. 1970. On deriving cleft sentences from pseudo-cleft sentences.Linguistic Inquiry,1(149-168).
- Bolinger, D.1972. A Look at Equations and Cleft Sentences. In Firchow, E., editor,Studies for Einar Haugen,pages 96–114. Mouton de Gruyter, The Hague.
- Borkin, A. 1984.Problems in Form and Function.Ablex, Norwood, NJ.
- Bresnan, J.and Grimshaw, J. (1978). The Syntax of Free Relatives in English.Linguistic Inquiry,9:331–391.
- Calude, Andreea S. 2009.Cleft Constructions in Spoken English.VDM Verlag Dr. Müller,Saarbrücken.
- Chomsky, N.1977. On wh-movement. In Culicover, P., Wasow, T., and Akmajian, A., editors,Formal Syntax,pages 71–132. Academic Press, New York.
- Collins, P. 1991.Cleft and pseudo-cleft constructions in English.Routledge, London.
- Declerk, R. 1994. The taxonomy and interpretation of clefts and pseudoclefts.Lingua,9(1):183–220.
- Delahunty, G.P. 1982.Topics in the syntax and semantics of English cleft sentences.Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.
- Delin, J.1989.Cleft constructions in discourse.Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
- Delin, J.and Oberlander, J. 1995. Syntactic constraints on discourse structure: the case of it-clefts.Linguistics,33:456–500.
- Dušková, L. 2005, From the Heritage of Vilém Mathesius and Jan Firbas: Syntax in the Service of FSP.Theory and Practice in English Studies. Proceedings from the Eighth Conference of British, American and Canadian Studies. Brno: Masarykova univerzita,3:7-23.
- Emonds, J. 1976.A Transformational Approach to English Syntax.Academic Press, New York.
- Finegan, Edward. 2004.Language: Its Structure and Use.4th ed. Boston etc. Thompson. p. 260-277.
- Gundel, J. 1977. Where do clefts sentences come from?Language,53:542–559.
- Halliday, M.A.K.1994.An introduction to functional grammar.Arnold, London, 2nd Edition.
- Halliday, M.A.K. 1976. Some aspects of the thematic organization of the English clause. In Kress, G., editor,System and Function in Language,pages 174–188.Oxford University Press,Oxford.
- Hedberg, N. 2000. The referential status of clefts.Language,76(4):891–920.
- Heggie, L. 1988.The Syntax of Copular Structures.Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.
- Herriman, J. 2004. Identifying relations: the semantic functions of wh-clefts in English.Text,24(4):447–469.
- Huddleston, R. and Pullum, G. 2002.The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language.Cambridge University Press,New York.
- Kiss, K. 1998. Identificational focus versus information focus.Language,74(2):245–273.
- Lambrecht, Knud. 2001. A framework for the analysis of cleft constructions. Linguistics, 39(3):463-516.
- Luo, C. 2009.Cleftability in Language.Wuhan University Press, China.
- Miller, J. 1999. Magnasyntax and syntactic analysis.Revue française de linguistique appliquée,IV(2):7–20.
- Miller, J. 1996. Clefts, particles and word order in languages of Europe.Language Sciences,18(1-2):111–125.
- Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., and Svartvik, J. 1985.A comprehensive grammar of the English language.Longman, London, New York.
- Sornicola, R.1988. It -clefts and Wh-clefts: two awkward sentence types.Linguistics,24:343–379.