Combatant

For the proposed aircraft carrier, seeUXV Combatant.

Afghan National Armysoldiersconducting apatrolin 2011, during theWar in Afghanistan.They would be considered combatants in the war.

Combatantis the legal status of a person entitled to directly participate in hostilities during anarmed conflict,and may be intentionally targeted by an adverse party for their participation in the armed conflict. Combatants are not afforded immunity from being directly targeted in situations of armed conflict and can be attacked regardless of the specific circumstances simply due to their status, so as to deprive their side of their support.

In an interstate conflict, the definition of "combatant" is found in Article 43 (2) ofAdditional Protocol Ito the 1949Geneva Conventions:"Members of the armed forces of a Party to a conflict (other thanmedical personnelandchaplainscovered by Article 33 of theThird [Geneva] Convention) are combatants, that is to say, they have the right to participate directly in hostilities. "Combatants when captured by an opposing party are automatically granted the status ofprotected persons,whether asprisoners of warorunlawful combatants.

In a non-interstate armed conflict, combatants who fought withnon-state armed groupsare not afforded immunity for taking part in hostilities, asinsurrectionis a crime under thedomestic lawof most nations. Therefore, they can be prosecuted by the territorial state or intervening third state for simply taking up arms.

Distinction between combatants and protected civilians

In an interstate conflict, the requirement ofdistinctionbetween combatants andprotectedcivilianslies at the root of thejus in bello.It is reflected in Article 48 of AdditionalProtocol Iof 1977 to the 1949Geneva Conventionsfor the Protection of War Victims, entitled "Basic rule": "the Parties to the conflict shall at all times distinguish between the civilian population and combatants and between civilian objects and military objectives and accordingly direct their operations only against military objectives."

In a non-interstate conflict, no requirement of distinction exists under AdditionalProtocol IIto the 1949 Geneva Conventions. However, it did state under Article 13 of the protocol that civilians "shall enjoy general protection against the dangers arising from military operations" until "they take a direct part in hostilities."

Status of combatants

Interstate armed conflict

Underinternational humanitarian lawapplicable to interstate armed conflict, combatants may be classified in one of two categories: privileged or unprivileged. In that sense, privileged means the retainment of prisoner of war status and impunity for the conduct prior to capture. Thus, combatants that have violated certain terms of the IHL may lose their status and become unprivileged combatants eitheripso jure(merely by having committed the act) or by decision of a competent court or tribunal. In the relevant treaties, the distinction between privileged and unprivileged is not made textually; international law uses the term combatant exclusively in the sense of what is here termed "privileged combatant".

If there is any doubt as to whether the person benefits from "combatant" status, they must be held as a POW until they have faced a "competent tribunal" (Article 5 of theThird Geneva Convention) to decide the issue.

Privileged combatants

The following categories of combatants qualify for prisoner-of-war status on capture:

1. Members of thearmed forcesof a Party to the conflict as well as members ofmilitiasorvolunteer corpsforming part of such armed forces.
2. Members of other militias and members of other volunteer corps, including those of organizedresistance movements,belonging to a party to the conflict and operating in or outside their own territory, even if thisterritory is occupied,provided that they fulfill the following conditions:
   • that of being commanded by a person responsible for his subordinates;
   • that of having a fixed distinctive sign recognizable at a distance;
   • that of carrying arms openly;
   • that of conducting their operations in accordance with the laws and customs of war.
3. Members of regular armed forces who profess allegiance to a government or an authority not recognized by the Detaining Power.
4. Inhabitants of a non-occupied territory, who on the approach of the enemy spontaneously take up arms to resist the invading forces, without having had time to form themselves into regular armed units, provided they carry arms openly and respect the laws and customs of war; often dubbed alevéeafter themass conscription during the French Revolution.

For countries which have signed the "Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts" (Protocol I), combatants who do not wear a distinguishing mark still qualify as prisoners of war if they carry arms openly during military engagements, and while visible to the enemy when they are deploying to conduct an attack against them.

Unprivileged combatants

Main article:Unprivileged combatant

There are several types of combatants who do not qualify as privileged combatants:

• Combatants who would otherwise be privileged but have breached thelaws and customs of war(e.g., committingperfidyorkilling surrendered enemy combatants). The loss of privileges in that case only occurs upon conviction, i.e. after a competent court has determined the unlawfulness of the conduct in a fair trial.
• Combatants who are captured without the minimum requirements for distinguishing themselves from the civilian population, i.e. carrying arms openly during military engagements and the deployment immediately preceding it, lose their right to prisoner of war status without trial under Article 44 (3) ofAdditional Protocol I.
• Spies,i.e. persons who collect information clandestinely in the territory of the opposing belligerent. Members of the armed forces conductingreconnaissanceorspecial forcesbehind enemy lines are not considered spies as long as they wear their own uniform.
• Mercenaries,child soldiers,and civilians who take a direct part in combat and do not fall into one of the categories listed in the previous section.

Most unprivileged combatants who do not qualify for protection under the Third Geneva Convention do so under theFourth Geneva Convention(GCIV),which concerns protected civilians, until they have had a "fair and regular trial".If found guilty at a regular trial, they can be punished under the civilian laws of the detaining power.

Non-interstate armed conflict

In a non-interstate armed conflict, combatants who fought withnon-state armed groupsare not afforded immunity for taking part in hostilities, asinsurrectionis a crime under thedomestic lawof most nations. Therefore, they can be prosecuted by the territorial state or intervening third state for simply taking up arms.On October 7, 2021, a formerTalibancommander was indicted by a federal grand jury in New York for the June 26, 2008 attack on an American military convoy that killed three U.S. soldiers and their Afghan interpreter, and October 27, 2008 shooting down of a U.S. military helicopter during theWar in Afghanistan(the conflict became non-interstate not long after theUnited States invasion of Afghanistanended on December 7, 2001).

See also

• Non-combatant
• Rule of Law in Armed Conflicts Project (RULAC)