Jump to content

Console war

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromConsole wars)
This article is about the video game industry term. For other uses, seeConsole Wars (disambiguation).
Part of a series on the
History of video games
Early history
Consoles
Arcade video games
Personal computer
Mobile games
Virtual reality
Cloud gaming
Other platforms
Genres
Lists

In the video game industry, aconsole wardescribes the competition between two or morevideo game consolemanufacturers in trying to achieve better consumer sales through more advanced console technology, an improved selection of video games, and general marketing around their consoles. While console manufacturers are generally always trying to out-perform other manufacturers in sales, these console wars engage in more direct tactics to compare their offerings directly against their competitors or to disparage the competition in contrast to their own, and thus the marketing efforts have tended to escalate in back-and-forth pushes.

While there have been many console wars to date, the term became popular betweenSegaandNintendoduring the late 1980s and early 1990s as Sega attempted to break into the United States video game market with itsSega Genesisconsole. Through a novel marketing approach and improved hardware, Sega had been able to gain a majority of the video game console market by 1991, three years after the Genesis’ launch. This caused back and forth competition between the two companies throughout the early 1990s. However, Nintendo eventually regained its market share and Sega stopped making home console hardware by 2001.[1]

Background and etymology

[edit]
See also:Video game console § Competition

The video game console market started in 1972 with the release of the first home console, theMagnavox Odyssey.As more manufacturers entered the market and technology improved, the market began to coalesce around the concept of console generations, groupings of consoles with similar technical specifications that vied in the consumer marketplace. Since 1972, there have been nine such console generations, with two to three dominant manufacturers controlling the marketplace.[2]

As with most industries without a single dominant leader, console manufacturers have marketed their products in a manner to highlight them in a more favorable manner compared to their competitors', or to focus on features that their competitors may lack, often in aggressive manners. For example, console manufacturers in the 1980s and 1990s heavily relied on the word size of thecentral processor unit,emphasizing that games had better capabilities with 16-bit processors over 8-bit ones.[3]This type of aggressive marketing led video game journalists to call the competitive marketing a "war" or "battle" as early as August 1988.[4][5](This language also recalled the so-called "format war"that had been raging betweenVHStapes andBeta-Maxsince the 1970s, as well, and was much in the public eye during the '80s.) As each new console generation emerged with new marketing approaches, journalists and consumers continued to use variations of the "war" language, including "system wars" and "console wars". By the early 2000s, the term "console war" was most commonly used to describe heated competition between console manufacturers within any generation.[5]

Sega versus Nintendo

[edit]

While not the only console war, the rivalry between Sega and Nintendo for dominance of the North American video game market in the late 1980s and early 1990s is generally the most visible example of a console war. It established the use of aggressive marketing and advertising tactics by each company to try to gain control of the marketplace, and ended around 1995 when a new player,Sony,entered and disrupted the console space.[6]

Background

[edit]

The United States video game industry suffered a severemarket crash in 1983from numerous factors which led to a larger market recession and increasing popularity of personal computers as a video game platform. A key contributing factor to the crash was the loss of publishing control for console games. Early success by some of the first third-party developers likeActivisionfor theAtari VCSconsole led to venture capitalists bringing in teams of inexperienced programmers to try to capture the same success, but only managed to flood the market with poor quality games, which made it difficult for good quality games to sell. The video game crash impacted other factors in the industry that were already in decline, such as video game arcades.[7]

In Japan,Nintendohad released itsFamicom(Family Computer) console in 1983, one of the first consoles of thethird generation.Japan did not have a similar third-party development system in place, and Nintendo maintained control on the manufacturing of game cartridges for the Famicom using a licensing model to limit which third-party games were published on it. Nintendo looked to release the unit in the United States, but recognized that the market was still struggling from the 1983 crash. Nintendo took several steps to redesign the Famicom prior to a United States launch. It was made to look like aVCRunit rather than a console, and was given the name the "Nintendo Entertainment System" to distance it from being a video game console.[8]Further, Nintendo added a special10NESlockout system that worked as a lock-and-key system with game cartridges to further prevent unauthorized games from being published for the system and avoid the loss of publishing control that had caused the 1983 crash.[9]The NES revitalized the U.S. video game industry and established Nintendo as the dominant name in video game consoles over Atari.[10]In lifetime sales, the NES had sold nearly 62 million units worldwide, with 34 million in North America.[11]

The Sega SG-1000 console

At the same time,Segawas looking to get into the video game console industry as well, having been a successful arcade game manufacturer, but due to the downturn in arcade game business, looked to use that expertise for the home market.[12]They released theSG-1000console in Japan the same day as the Famicom in 1983, but sold only 160,000 units of the SG-1000 in its first year.[13]

Sega redesigned the SG-1000 twice to try to build a system to challenge Nintendo's dominance; the SG-1000 Mark II remained compatible with the SG-1000 but failed to gain any further sales.[14][15]The next iteration, theSega Mark III,was released in 1985, using Sega's arcade hardware for its internals to provide more refined graphics. The console was slightly more powerful than the Famicom, and Sega's marketing attempted to push on the more advanced graphics their system offered over the Famicom.[16]However, Sega found that Nintendo had also contracted other developers to only develop their games exclusive to the Famicom, and Sega was forced to develop their own titles or to port the games from the other developers themselves, limiting the size of the Mark III's library in Japan.[17]Sega attempted to follow Nintendo with a worldwide release of the Mark III, rebranded as the Master System.[18]The Master System was released in the United States in 1986, but Nintendo had similar licensing practices in the U.S. to keep developers exclusive to the NES, limiting the library of games that Sega could offer and to also ensure that another gaming crash didn't begin. Further, Sega's third-party distributor, the toy companyTonka,opted against localizing several of the Japanese games Sega had created, further capping the game library Sega could offer in the U.S. Only a total estimated two million systems were sold.[19]

Entering the United States' market

[edit]
The Sega and Nintendo console war primarily centered on the launch of theSega Genesis(top) to try to outsell theNintendo Entertainment Systemin the United States.

Thefourth generation of video game consoleswas started by the launch ofNEC'sPC Enginein 1987 in Japan. While the PC Engine used an 8-bit CPU, it included 16-bit graphic rendering components, and NEC marketed this heavily as a 16-bit game console to distinguish it from the Famicom and Mark III; when NEC brought the PC Engine worldwide, it was rebranded as the "TurboGrafx-16" to emphasize this. After the release of the TurboGrafx-16, use of the bit designation caught on, which led manufacturers to focus their advertising heavily on the number of bits in a console system for the next two console generations.[3]

NEC was one of many competitors to Sega and Nintendo.[20]Following a similar path they had done for the Mark III, Sega used their arcade game technology, now using 16-bit processor boards, and adapted those into a home console, released in Japan in October 1988 as theMega Drive.[21]Compared to its prior consoles, the Mega Drive was designed to be more mature-looking and less like a toy compared to the Famicom to appeal to an older demographic of gamers, and "16-bit" was emblazoned on the console's case to emphasize this feature. While the system was positively received by gaming magazines likeFamitsu,it was overshadowed by the release a week prior ofSuper Mario Bros. 3for the Famicom.[21]

As with the Master System, Sega also planned for a major push of the Mega Drive into the United States to challenge Nintendo's dominance among other markets, with the unit rebranded as the Sega Genesis. Sega was dissatisfied with Tonka's handling of the Master System and so sought a new partner through theAtari Corporationled byJack Tramiel.Tramiel was bullish on the Genesis due to its cost, and turned down the offer, instead focusing more on the company's computer offerings.[22]Sega instead used its dormant Sega of America branch to run a limited launch of the console in August 1989 in test markets of New York City and Los Angeles, with its launch system being bundled with the port of the arcade gameAltered Beast.[22]

In October 1989, the company named former Atari Entertainment Electronics Division president Michael Katz as CEO of Sega of America to implement a marketing strategy for a nation-wide push of the Genesis with a target of one million consoles. Katz used a two-prong strategy to challenge Nintendo. The first was to stress the arcade-like capabilities of the Genesis with the capabilities of games likeAltered Beastcompared to the simpler 8-bit graphics of the NES, and devising slogans such as "Genesis does what Nintendon't."[22]Katz also observed that Nintendo still held most of the rights to arcade game ports for the NES, so the second part of his strategy was to work with the Japanese headquarters of Sega to pay celebrities for their naming rights for games likePat Riley Basketball,Arnold Palmer Golf,Joe Montana Football,andMichael Jackson's Moonwalker.[22]

Most of these games were developed by Sega's Japanese programmers, though notably,Joe Montana Footballhad originally been developed by Mediagenic, the new name for Activision after it had become more involved in publishing and business application development alongside games. Mediagenic had started a football game which Katz wanted to brand underJoe Montana's name, but unknown to Katz at the time, the game was only partially finished due to internal strife at Mediagenic. After the deal had been completed and Katz learned of this, he took the game toElectronic Arts.Electronic Arts had already made itself a significant force in the industry as they had been able to reverse engineer the cartridge format for both the NES and the Genesis, though Electronic Arts' CEOTrip Hawkinsfelt it was better for the company to develop for the Genesis. Electronic Arts used their reverse engineering knowledge as part of their negotiations with Sega to secure a freer licensing contract to develop openly on the Genesis, which proved beneficial for both companies. At the time Katz had secured Mediagenic'sJoe Montana football,Electronic Arts was working on itsJohn Madden Footballseries for personal computers. Electronic Arts was able to help bringJoe Montana Football,more as an arcade title compared to the strategicJohn Madden Football,to reality, as well as bringingJohn Madden Footballover as a Genesis title.[22]

The second push in 1991

[edit]

The Genesis still struggled in the United States against Nintendo, and only sold about 500,000 units by mid-1990. Nintendo had releasedSuper Mario Bros. 3in February 1990 which further drove sales away from Sega's system. Nintendo themselves did not seem to be affected by either Sega's or NEC's entry into the console market.[22]Sega's presidentHayao Nakayamawanted the company to develop an iconic mascot character and build a game around it as one means to challenge Nintendo's ownMariomascot.[23]Company artistNaoto Ohshimacame up with the concept ofSonic the Hedgehog,a fast anthropomorphic character with an "attitude" that would appeal to teenagers and incorporating the blue color of Sega's logo, andYuji Nakahelped to develop the gameSonic the Hedgehogto showcase the character as well as the graphics and processing speed of the Genesis.[24]The game was ready by early 1991 and launched in North America in June 1991.

Separately, Sega fired Katz and replaced him withTom Kalinskeas Sega of America's new CEO in mid-1990.[25]Kalinske had been president ofMatteland did not have much experience in video games but recognized therazor and blades model,and developed a new strategy for Sega's push to challenge Nintendo's dominance in America with four key decisions, which included cutting the price of the Genesis from$189to$149,and continue the same aggressive marketing campaigns to make the Genesis look "cool" over the NES and of Nintendo's upcomingSuper Nintendo Entertainment System(SNES).[25]Further, Kalinske pushed hard for American developers like Electronic Arts to create games on the Genesis that would better fit American preferences, particularly sports simulation games which the console had gained a reputation for. Finally, Kalinske insisted on makingSonic the Hedgehogthe bundled game on the system following its release in June 1991, replacingAltered Beastand even offering those that had purchased a Genesis withAltered Beasta trade-in replacement forSonic.[25]

Under Kalinske, Sega also revamped their advertising approach, aiming for more of a young adult audience, as Nintendo still was positioning the SNES as a child-friendly console. Advertising focused onSonic,the edgier games in the Genesis library, and its larger library of sports games which appealed to this group. Television ads for the Genesis and its games ended with the "Sega Scream" – a character shouting the name "Sega" to the camera in the final shot – which also caught on quickly.[25]

These changes, all predating the SNES's planned North American release in September 1991, gave Sega its first gain on Nintendo in the U.S. market. Further, the price cut to$149made the Genesis a cheaper option than the planned$199price for the SNES led many families to purchase the Genesis instead of waiting for the SNES. The Genesis had a larger library of games for the U.S. with over 150 titles by the time the SNES launched alongside eight games, and Sega continued to push out titles that drew continuous press throughout the year, whereas with the SNES, its game library was generally held up by flagshipMarioandZeldagames that only came at out once a year, along with less which further made the Genesis a more desirable option.[25]

For Nintendo, up until 1991, they had been passive towards Sega's approach in North America, but as the SNES launch approach, the company recognized that they were losing ground. The company shifted their advertising in North America to focus on more of the advanced features of the SNES that were not present in the Genesis, such as itsMode 7to create simulated 3D perspective effects.[26]When the SNES launched, this would be most prominently seen with the release ofF-Zero (video game),where the 3D made the game look more complex, compared to earlier 3rd person racing games on home consoles.Pilotwingsused Mode 7 to better simulate the landings that would happen, after players completed the other objectives in the level. The initial shipment of one million SNES units sold out quickly and a total of 3.4 million SNES were sold by the end of 1991, a record for a new console launch, but the Genesis maintained strong sales against the SNES.[25]The Genesis's resilience against the SNES led several of Nintendo's third-party developers to break their exclusive development agreements with Nintendo and seek out licenses to also develop for Genesis. These developers included Acclaim, Konami, Tecmo, Taito, and Capcom, the latter of which arranged to have a special licensing mechanism with Sega that allowed them to publish select titles exclusively for the Genesis.[27]

During this period, the push for marketing by both Nintendo and Sega led to the growth ofvideo game magazines.Nintendo had already establishedNintendo Powerin 1988 in part to serve as a help guide for players on its popular titles, and was able to use this further to advertise the SNES and upcoming games. Numerous other titles grew in the late 1980s and early 1990s, giving Sega the opportunity to market its games heavily in these publications.[28]

The war escalates in 1992 and 1993

[edit]

Nintendo publicly acknowledged that it knew it was no longer in the dominant position in the console market by 1992.[27]A year into the SNES's release, the SNES's price was lowered to$149to match the Genesis, to which Sega reduced the Genesis to$129shortly after. The SNES was helped by Capcom's decision to maintain exclusivity of its home port of its popular brawler arcade gameStreet Fighter II: The World Warriorto the SNES when it was released in June 1992.[27][29]Nintendo also experimented with including processing chips within game cartridges to augment to power of the SNES, with theSuper FXchip bring real-time 3D rendering first used inStar Fox.[30]While the SNES outsold the Genesis in the U.S. in 1992. the Genesis still had a larger install base.[27][29]

The success ofStreet Fighter IIboth as an arcade game and as a home console title led to the growth of thefighting gamegenre, and numerous variations from other developers followed. Of significant interest wasMidway'sMortal Kombat,released to arcades in 1992.[31]Compared to most other fighting games at the time,Mortal Kombatwas much more violent. The game showed combatants’ blood splatter during combat and allowed players to end matches in graphically intense "fatalities.” Because of its controversial style and gameplay, the game proved extremely popular in arcades.[29]

By 1993, Both Nintendo and Sega recognized the need to haveMortal Kombaton their consoles. However, Nintendo, fearing issues with the game’s violence, licensed a “clean” version of the game from Acclaim for the SNES. Which included replacing the blood splatter with sweat and removing the aforementioned fatalities. Sega also licensed a censored version of the game for the Genesis. However, players could enter acheat codethat reverted the game back to its original arcade version.[32]Both home versions were released in September, and approximately 6.5 million units were sold over the game’s lifetime. But the Genesis version was more popular with three to five times more sales than its SNES counterpart.[29]

External videos
video iconC-SPAN footage of the first congressional hearing on December 9, 1993.

The popularity of the home console version ofMortal Kombat,coupled with other moral panics in the early 1990s, led to concerns from parents, activists and lawmakers in the United States, leading up to the1993 congressional hearings on video gamesfirst held in December. Led by SenatorsJoe LiebermanandHerb Kohl,the Senate Committees onGovernmental Affairsandthe Judiciarybrought several of the video game industry leaders, includingHoward Lincoln,vice president of Nintendo of America, and Bill White, vice president of Sega of America, to discuss the way they marketed games likeMortal KombatandNight Trapon consoles to children. Lincoln and White accused each other's companies of creating the issue at hand. Lincoln stated that Nintendo had taken a curated approach to selecting games for their consoles, and that violent games had no place in the market. White responded that Sega purposely was targeting an older audience than Nintendo, and had created aratings systemfor its games that it had been trying to encourage the rest of the industry to use; further, despite Nintendo's oversight, White pointed out that there were still many Nintendo titles that incorporated violence.[29]With neither Lincoln nor White giving much play, Lieberman concluded the first hearing with a warning that the industry needs to come together with some means to regulate video games or else Congress would pass laws to do this for them.

By the time of the second hearing in March 1994, the industry had come together to form theInteractive Digital Software Association(today the Entertainment Software Association) and were working to establish theEntertainment Software Rating Board(ESRB), a ratings panel, which ultimately was introduced by September 1994.[33]Despite Sega offering its ratings system as a starting point, Nintendo refused to work with that as they still saw Sega as their rival, requiring a wholly new system to be created.[34]The ESRB eventually established a form modelled off theMotion Picture Association of America(MPAA)'s rating system for film, and the committee was satisfied with the proposed system and allowed the video game industry to continue without further regulations.

The arrival of Sony and the end of the war

[edit]
TheSega Saturn(top) andNintendo 64(middle) struggled against Sony's newcomer, thePlayStation,which ultimately ended Sega and Nintendo's console war.

In 1994 and 1995, there was a contraction in the video game industry, withNPD Groupreporting a 17% and 19% year-to-year drop in revenue. While Sega had been outperforming Nintendo in 1993, it still carried corporate debt while Nintendo remained debt-free from having a more dominant position in the worldwide market, even beating Sega in the North American and US market winning the 16 bit console war. To continue to fight Nintendo, Sega's next console was theSega Saturn,first released in November 1994 in Japan. It brought in technology used by Sega's arcade games that used 3d polygonal graphics, and launch titles featured home versions of these arcade games includingVirtua Fighter.WhileVirtua Fighterwas not a pack-in game, sales of the title were nearly 1:1 with the console in Japan.[35]Sega, recognizing that they had numerous consoles with disparate games they were now trying to support, decided to put most of their attention onto the Saturn line going forward, dropping support for the Genesis despite its sales still being strong in the United States at the time.[35]

At the same time, a new competitor in the console marketplace emerged,Sony Computer Entertainment,with the introduction of thePlayStationin December 1994. The PlayStation moved away from cartridges and took advantage of nansceneCD-ROMtechnology for game distribution, allowing much more data to be stored on each disc and reducing the costs for reproduction. Nintendo had worked with Sony on a prototype add-on for the SNES, theSuper NES CD-ROM,that would allow it to read CD-ROMs, but the project was terminated by 1992 after Nintendo revealed it opted to start working withPhilipsand its own optical disc technology, while Sony used their development towards the PlayStation.[36]Sega, aware of Sony's potential competition in Japan, made sure to have enough Saturns ready for sale on the day the PlayStation first shipped as to overwhelm Sony's offering.[35]

Both Sega and Sony turned to move these units to the North American market. With the formation of the ISDA, a new North American tradeshow, theElectronic Entertainment Expo(E3) was created in 1995 to focus on video games, to distinguish it from theConsumer Electronics Show(CES), which covered all home electronics. Nintendo, Sega and Sony gave their full support to E3 in 1995. Sega believed they had the stronger position going into E3 over Sony, as gaming publications, comparing the Saturn to the PlayStation, rated the Saturn as the better system. At the first E3 in May 1995, Sega's Kalinske premiered the North American version of the Saturn, announced its various features and its selling price of$399,and said that while it would officially launch that same day, they had already sent a number of systems to selected vendors for sale.[35]Sony's Olaf Olafsson of Sony Electronic Publishing began to cover the PlayStation features, then invited Steve Race, president of Sony Computer Entertainment America to the stage. Race stated the launch price of the PlayStation, "$299",and then left to" thunderous applause ".[35]The surprise price cut caught Sega off-guard, and, in addition to several stores pulling Sega from their lineup due to being shunned from early Saturn sales, the higher price point made it more difficult for them to sell the system.[35]As a result of this strategy by Sony, future E3s became a battleground for other console wars, with journalists judging the various hardware manufacturers' presentations to determine which one had the most successful pitches.[37]

When the PlayStation officially launched in the United States in September 1995, its sales over the first two days exceeded what the Saturn had sold over the prior five months.[38]Because Sega had invested heavily on Saturn into the future, Sony's competition drastically hurt the company's finances.[39]

In the case of Nintendo, they bypassed the 32-bit CPU and instead their next offering was theNintendo 64,a 64-bit CPU console first released in June 1996.[39]While this gave them powerful capabilities such as 3D graphics to keep up and surpass those on the Saturn and PlayStation, it was still a cartridge-based system limiting how much information could be stored for each game. This decision ultimately cost themSquare Softwho moved their popularFinal Fantasyseries over to the PlayStation line to take advantage of the larger space on optical media.[39]The first PlayStation game in the series,Final Fantasy VII,drove sales of the PlayStation, further weakening Nintendo's position and driving Sega further out of the market.[40][41]

By this point, the console war between Nintendo and Sega had evaporated, with both companies now facing Sony as their rival. Sega made one more console, theDreamcast,which had a number of innovative features including a built-inmodemfor online connectivity, but the console's lifespan was short-lived in part due to the success of Sony's next product, thePlayStation 2,currently being the best-selling home console of all time.[42]Sega left the home console hardware business in 2001 to focus on software development and licensing.[41]Nintendo remains a key player in the home console business, but more recently has taken a"blue ocean strategy"approach to avoid competing directly with Sony or Microsoft on a feature-for-feature basis with consoles like theWii,Nintendo DS,andNintendo Switch.[43]

Legacy

[edit]

The Sega/Nintendo console war is the subject of thenon-fiction novelConsole Warsby Blake Harris in 2014,[44]as well as afilm adaption/documentaryof the book in 2020.[45]

Sega and Nintendo have since collaborated on various software titles. Sega has developed a biennialMario & Sonic at the Olympicsseries of sports games based on the Summer and Winter Olympics since 2008 featuring characters from both theSuper MarioandSonicseries,[46]while Nintendo has developed theSuper Smash Bros.crossover fighter series for numerous Nintendo properties that has included Sonic as a playable character along with otherSoniccharacters in supporting roles sinceSuper Smash Bros. Brawl.[47]

Sony versus Microsoft

[edit]

Background

[edit]

Since the sixth generation, both Sony and Microsoft have been direct competitors for home consoles. Since 2000, both companies have released a new console model within a year of each other with roughly comparable specifications. While Nintendo also has remained a significant competitor to both companies, its development and marketing strategy using the"blue ocean" approachis considered fundamentally different from Sony or Microsoft that it is usually not regarded as major participant in the console war.[43]

Initial Challenge From Microsoft

[edit]

Microsoft specifically entered the console market with theXboxconsole in 2001 as it saw Sony'sPlayStation 2as a potential competitor to the home computer as a ubiquitous device in the living room. Whereas the PlayStation 2 was developed from mostly custom components, Microsoft approached the Xbox as a highly refined personal computer based onMicrosoft WindowsandDirectXtechnology. The original Xbox did not compete well against the PlayStation 2, selling only about 24 million units worldwide against the PlayStation 2's 155 million, with Microsoft reportedly failing to profit on the console hardware. Nonetheless, Microsoft, satisfied with the Xbox's overall performance, reaffirmed its commitment to the console marketplace with the reveal of the Xbox 360 in 2005.[48]

Xbox 360 vs PlayStation 3

[edit]

Microsoft was able to take lessons learned from the first Xbox to its second model, theXbox 360released in 2005, ahead of Sony's release of thePlayStation 3in 2006. Besides the earlier release and improved design, Microsoft had secured more first-party developers in itsMicrosoft Game Studios,mimicking Sony's own first-party developers and other third-party developers for several console exclusives.[49]The PlayStation 3, on the other hand, had fewer exclusives at launch and was hampered by a higher price point at launch, giving the Xbox 360 an edge in the first years of release.[50]Both consoles aimed to include multimedia feature into high-definition movie playback.[51]One miscue Microsoft had was backing theHD-DVDstandard for movie playback over theBlu-raystandard that Sony had selected, as shortly after the Xbox 360's release, the movie industry had standardized on Blu-ray.[52]The Xbox 360 also suffered from the "Red Ring of Death",a hardware fault on a large fraction of retail models that cost Microsoft over$1.1 billionin repairs over the console's lifetime.[53]

Both consoles were challenged by Nintendo'sWiiand specifically its novelWiimotemotion-sensing device. To compete, both Microsoft and Sony released their motion-sensing systems, theKinectandPlayStation Move,respectively, for their consoles. The companies also released console refreshes mid-generation. Microsoft released a low-cost Xbox 360 S, which shipped with less internal storage space, as well as a high-end Xbox 360 E, which shipped with more storage space and the Kinect sensor. Sony released two different Slim models of the PlayStation 3 that reduced the system size and subsequent retail price which helped improve sales. Ultimately, the Xbox 360 sold an estimated 84 million units, based on industry estimates as Microsoft stopped reported its sales,[54]while the PlayStation 3 sold 87 million units;[55]the Wii comparatively sold over 101 million units.[56]

Xbox One vs PlayStation 4

[edit]

Sony and Microsoft both released their next consoles, thePlayStation 4and theXbox One,in 2013. Sony considered the difficulties developers had with using the custom instruction set for the Cell processor on the PlayStation 3 and restructured the PlayStation 4 to use more the standardx86instruction set used by most personal computers helping to bring development in convergence with computer systems.[57]Microsoft initially wanted to drive the Xbox One as a replacement for a cable box in the living room as a single source for entertainment with features aimed around television viewing in addition to gaming. To achieve this, the Xbox One was to be shipped with Kinect and was to use an always-on Internet connection to enable numerous features, such as the ability to share games with other family members. However, when these features were first promoted, there was a heavy backlash from journalists and consumers, considering these unnecessary, privacy-invading features. Microsoft had to pull many of these features from the Xbox One before launch, such as eliminating the always-connected requirement and the need to use Kinect.[53]Sony took the opportunity in their PlayStation 4 marketing to play off Microsoft's missteps, such as demonstrating the simplicity of game sharing by simply passing along the physical media to another person, as well as its lower price point.[58]While Microsoft was able to course-correct the Xbox One after launch, Sony had gained enough ground with the capabilities of the PlayStation 4 along with a strong library of console-exclusive titles, and the PlayStation 4 outsold the Xbox One, 117 million units[59]to 52 million units.[60][61]

The Xbox One was ultimately the more expensive of the two,[62]however, both console prices were high when compared to the historical console market,[63]setting a trend for ever more expensive consoles.

Xbox Series X|S vs PlayStation 5

[edit]

Both companies released their next consoles in 2020, thePlayStation 5and theXbox Series X and Series S.Both console families represent technology improvements with similar target specifications, including high-resolution and high framerates, high-speed internal storage, and backward compatibility with earlier systems.[64]More recently Microsoft has expanded game offerings beyond consoles, such asXbox Game Passand thexCloudgame streaming service, as to move away from a console war mentality.[65]Phil Spencer,head of Xbox for Microsoft, stated that they see Xbox in competition withNetflixand other online streaming services vying for entertainment options, rather than Sony.[60]Similarly, Sony launched a more intense focus into streaming services. For example, in 2020, a "media remote" was launched, advertising "effortless control of a wide range of blockbuster entertainment on the PS5".[66]

With Microsoft's acquisition ofZenimax Mediain 2021 andacquisitionofActivision Blizzardin 2023, the potential for escalation in Sony/Microsoft console war grew, as Microsoft could potentially makeBethesda Softworksand Activision Blizzard's games exclusive to the Xbox line.[67]Microsoft's potential ownership of theCall of Dutyseries had become a focus of Sony's concerns of the acquisition. While Microsoft has given Sony a written commitment to keep theCall of Dutyseries on the PlayStation consoles for several years, Sony has expressed concern that this is not adequate and that Microsoft would make the series Xbox-exclusive following that period.[68]As regulatory agencies considered these positions, Microsoft stated that they had been losing the console war against Sony since 2001, having always been in a weaker sales position against the PlayStation line.[69]

Other console wars

[edit]

Atari versus Intellivision

[edit]

Following the release of theAtari 2600in 1977,Mattelsought to enter the console market, and released theIntellivisionin 1979. The console was designed for improved graphics and other features compared to the Atari 2600, a factor that dominated the marketing campaign for Intellivision. Intellivision's launch included a number ofsports games,using licenses from the major sports leagues, and included an advertising campaign with sports writerGeorge Plimpton.[70]Mattel also focused on hardware accessories to the console like a keyboard for programming. While the Atari 2600 sold an estimated 30 million consoles, the Intellivision sold around 5 million units and was considered the primary competitor to Atari in thesecond generation of video game consoles.[71]

In the following years, Mattel sought to expand the Intellivision line, releasing theIntellivision IIin 1983 and with development of an Intellivision III starting in 1982. Atari released its successor to the 2600, theAtari 5200,in 1982 to compete with the Intellivision.[72]The console war between Atari and Intellivision was shaken up by the arrival ofColeco'sColecoVisionin 1982, which was a further technological improvement over both Atari and Intellivision. Both Atari and Mattel suffered significant financial losses in thevideo game crash of 1983.Atari would scale back its video game efforts in the years that followed, while Mattel sold off the Intellivision brand in 1984.[73][70]

After decades where the intellectual property from both Atari and Mattel shifted across different agencies,Atari SAacquired the Intellivision brand and rights to over 200 games from its systems in May 2024, which Atari SA jokingly stated to have put an end to the decades-long console war.[74][71]

1990s handheld consoles

[edit]

A number of major handheld consoles were released on the market within about a year of each other: Nintendo'sGame Boy,Sega'sGame Gear,and theAtari Lynx.While the Game Boy used a monochromatic display, both the Game Gear and Lynx had colour displays. As these handheld releases were alongside the Sega v. Nintendo console war, they were also subject to heavy marketing and advertising to try to draw consumers.[26][75]However, the Game Boy ultimately won out in this battle, selling over 118 million units over its lifetime (including its future revisions) compared to 10 million for the Game Gear and 3 million for the Lynx. The Game Boy initially sold for$50or more cheaper than its competitors, and had a larger library of games, including what is considered the handheld'skiller app,Tetris,that drew non-gamers to purchase the handheld to play it.[76]

In video games

[edit]

TheHyperdimension Neptuniaseries of video games started as a parody of the console wars, incorporating personified consoles, developers, consumers, and other such figures within the gaming industry.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Ocbazghi 30, Emmanuel (January 12, 2021)."How Sega went from huge fame in the '90s to cultural irrelevancy".Business Insider.Retrieved2022-09-19.{{cite web}}:CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  2. ^Thompson, Arthur; Peteraf, Margaret; Gamble, John; Strickland, A. (2008). "Case 14: Competition in Video Game Consoles: Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo Battle for Supremacy".Crafting and Executing Strategy: The Quest for Competitive Advantage: Concepts and Cases 16th Edition.McGraw-Hill.pp. C-198–C-211.ISBN978-0073381244.
  3. ^abTherrien, Carl; Picard, Martin (April 29, 2015). "Enter the bit wars: A study of video game marketing and platform crafting in the wake of the TurboGrafx-16 launch".New Media & Society.18(10): 2323–2339.doi:10.1177/1461444815584333.S2CID19553739.
  4. ^Daglow, Don (August 1988). "The Changing Role of Computer Game Designers".Computer Gaming World.No. 50.
  5. ^abPaez, Danny (September 20, 2020)."How a Retro Rivalry Ignited the Most Heated Feud in Video Games".Inverse.RetrievedFebruary 13,2021.
  6. ^Greene, Gavin (November 28, 2015)."The art and legacy of the '90s console war".Venture Beat.RetrievedFebruary 22,2021.
  7. ^Kent, Steven L.(2010). "Chapter 14: The Fall".The Ultimate History of Video Games: from Pong to Pokemon and beyond...the story behind the craze that touched our lives and changed the world.Crown.ISBN978-0307560872.
  8. ^Cifaldi, Frank (October 19, 2015)."In Their Words: Remembering the Launch of the Nintendo Entertainment System".IGN.RetrievedJuly 1,2019.
  9. ^O'Donnell, Casey (2011). "The Nintendo Entertainment System and the 10NES Chip: Carving the Video Game Industry in Silicon".Games and Culture.6(1): 83–100.doi:10.1177/1555412010377319.S2CID53358125.
  10. ^McGill, Douglas C. (December 4, 1988)."Nintendo Scores Big".The New York Times.RetrievedJuly 1,2010.
  11. ^"Nintendo Co., Ltd.: Consolidated Sales Transition by Region"(PDF).Nintendo.co.jp.RetrievedAugust 8,2018.
  12. ^Battelle, John (December 1993)."The Next Level: Sega's Plans for World Domination".Wired.Condé Nast Publications.Archivedfrom the original on May 2, 2012.RetrievedOctober 9,2013.
  13. ^Marley, Scott (December 2016). "SG-1000".Retro Gamer.No. 163.Future Publishing.pp. 56–61.
  14. ^Kohler, Chris (October 2009)."Playing the SG-1000, Sega's First Game Machine".Wired Publications.Archivedfrom the original on January 1, 2014.RetrievedOctober 5,2009.
  15. ^McFerran, Damien. "Retroinspection: Master System".Retro Gamer(44). London, UK: 48–53.ISSN1742-3155.
  16. ^Plunkett, Luke (February 27, 2012)."The Story of Sega's First Ever Home Console".Kotaku.Gawker Media.Archivedfrom the original on September 15, 2014.RetrievedSeptember 14,2014.
  17. ^Kent, Steven L. (2010). "Chapter 18: The Seeds of Competition".The Ultimate History of Video Games: from Pong to Pokemon and beyond...the story behind the craze that touched our lives and changed the world.Crown.ISBN978-0307560872.
  18. ^"Bruce Lowry: The Man That Sold the NES".Game Informer.Vol. 12, no. 110.GameStop.June 2002. pp. 102–103.
  19. ^Kent, Steven L. (2010). "Chapter 20: The New Empire".The Ultimate History of Video Games: from Pong to Pokemon and beyond...the story behind the craze that touched our lives and changed the world.Crown.ISBN978-0307560872.
  20. ^Fahs, Travis (April 21, 2009)."IGN Presents the History of Sega (page 4)".IGN.Ziff Davis.Archivedfrom the original on February 21, 2014.RetrievedOctober 5,2013.
  21. ^abSczepaniak, John (August 2006)."Retroinspection: Mega Drive".Retro Gamer.No. 27. Imagine Publishing. pp. 42–47.Archivedfrom the original on September 24, 2015 – via Sega-16.
  22. ^abcdefKent, Steven L. (2010). "Chapter 22: The Year of the Hardware".The Ultimate History of Video Games: from Pong to Pokemon and beyond...the story behind the craze that touched our lives and changed the world.Crown.ISBN978-0307560872.
  23. ^Kennedy, Sam."Sonic Boom".1UP.com.Archived fromthe originalon June 4, 2011.RetrievedSeptember 24,2014.
  24. ^Wawro, Alex (March 21, 2018)."Sonic the Hedgehog's origin story, according to the devs who made him".Gamasutra.RetrievedMarch 21,2018.
  25. ^abcdefKent, Steven L. (2010). "Chapter 23: Run for the Money".The Ultimate History of Video Games: from Pong to Pokemon and beyond...the story behind the craze that touched our lives and changed the world.Crown.ISBN978-0307560872.
  26. ^abRingall, Jaz (May 7, 2012)."Definitive Years in Gaming History: 1991".Eurogamer.RetrievedFebruary 22,2021.
  27. ^abcdKent, Steven L. (2010). "Chapter 24: The War".The Ultimate History of Video Games: from Pong to Pokemon and beyond...the story behind the craze that touched our lives and changed the world.Crown.ISBN978-0307560872.
  28. ^Armstrong, Simon (September 4, 2019)."Sonic, Street Fighter and the 'golden age' of gaming magazines".BBC News.RetrievedFebruary 22,2021.
  29. ^abcdeKent, Steven L. (2010). "Chapter 25: Moral Kombat".The Ultimate History of Video Games: from Pong to Pokemon and beyond...the story behind the craze that touched our lives and changed the world.Crown.ISBN978-0307560872.
  30. ^Pettus, Sam (2013).Service Games: The Rise and Fall of Sega.Smashwords.p. 89.ISBN9781311080820.
  31. ^"75 Power Players".Next Generation.Imagine Media (11): 68. November 1995.
  32. ^"Mortal Kombat 1993 Cheats - Genesis Cheats Wiki Guide".IGN.15 March 2017.Retrieved2022-07-27.
  33. ^"Makers Say They'll Rate Video Games".The New York Times.Associated Press. March 5, 1994.Archivedfrom the original on 2018-06-18.RetrievedOctober 30,2018.
  34. ^Kohler, Chris (July 29, 2009)."July 29, 1994: Videogame Makers Propose Ratings Board to Congress".Wired.Archivedfrom the original on February 18, 2014.RetrievedJune 1,2011.
  35. ^abcdefKent, Steven L. (2010). "Chapter 27: The" Next "Generation".The Ultimate History of Video Games: from Pong to Pokemon and beyond...the story behind the craze that touched our lives and changed the world.Crown.ISBN978-0307560872.
  36. ^Robinson, Andy (February 5, 2020)."The Road To PS5: PSOne's Betrayal And Revenge Story".Video Games Chronicle.Archivedfrom the original on January 18, 2022.RetrievedFebruary 6,2020.
  37. ^https://www.gamesindustry.biz/the-life-and-death-of-e3
  38. ^"History of the PlayStation".IGN.28 August 1998.Archivedfrom the original on February 18, 2012.RetrievedNovember 16,2014.
  39. ^abcKent, Steven L. (2010). "Chapter 28: The Mainstrain and all its Perils".The Ultimate History of Video Games: from Pong to Pokemon and beyond...the story behind the craze that touched our lives and changed the world.Crown.ISBN978-0307560872.
  40. ^"The Making Of:Final Fantasy VII".Edge.August 26, 2012. p. 3. Archived fromthe originalon October 26, 2014.RetrievedMarch 5,2015.
  41. ^abKent, Steven L. (2010). "Chapter 29: And the Cycle Continues".The Ultimate History of Video Games: from Pong to Pokemon and beyond...the story behind the craze that touched our lives and changed the world.Crown.ISBN978-0307560872.
  42. ^Perry, Douglass (September 9, 2009)."The Rise And Fall Of The Dreamcast".Gamasutra.RetrievedFebruary 28,2021.
  43. ^abOhannessian, Kevin (January 20, 2017)."With Nintendo's Switch Game Console, New Ideas Create New Experiences".Fast Company.Archivedfrom the original on January 20, 2017.RetrievedJanuary 20,2017.
  44. ^Kohler, Chris (May 13, 2014)."The Untold Story of How Sega Nearly Won the Console Wars".Wired.RetrievedSeptember 13,2017.
  45. ^Good, Owen S. (September 23, 2020)."In the rousing doc Console Wars, the good guys win… and lose, too".Polygon.RetrievedSeptember 24,2020.
  46. ^Schiesel, Seth (November 23, 2007)."Plumber's Progress".The New York Times.RetrievedFebruary 13,2021.
  47. ^Kuchera, Ben (October 10, 2007)."Sonic to be a playable character in Super Smash Bros. Brawl".Ars Technica.RetrievedFebruary 13,2021.
  48. ^Bass, Dina (January 6, 2021)."Xbox: The Oral History of an American Video Game Empire".Bloomberg News.RetrievedJanuary 6,2021.
  49. ^Gamespot Staff (July 14, 2006)."Xbox 360: Inside and Out".GameSpot.RetrievedFebruary 14,2021.
  50. ^Purchase, Robert (February 9, 2011)."Analysed: lifetime PS3 and 360 sales".Eurogamer.RetrievedFebruary 13,2021.
  51. ^Buchanan, Matt (June 12, 2013)."The Future of Game Consoles Isn't Just About Games".The New Yorker.RetrievedFebruary 14,2021.
  52. ^Lawler, R. (June 7, 2014)."Format Wars: Blu-ray vs. HD DVD".Engadget.RetrievedFebruary 13,2021.
  53. ^abReyes, Jessica (February 1, 2021)."The Stunning Transformation Of The Xbox".Looper.RetrievedFebruary 13,2021.
  54. ^"E3 2014: $399 Xbox One Out Now, Xbox 360 Sales Rise to 84 million".GameSpot.Archivedfrom the original on March 25, 2017.RetrievedMarch 24,2017.
  55. ^"SIE Business Development".Sony Computer Entertainment.Archivedfrom the original on April 27, 2019.RetrievedApril 26,2019.
  56. ^"Consolidated Sales Transition by Region"(PDF).Nintendo. March 31, 2016.Archived(PDF)from the original on April 27, 2016.RetrievedApril 29,2016.
  57. ^Newman, Jared (September 30, 2017)."Sony's Most Valuable Contractor".Fast Company.RetrievedFebruary 13,2020.
  58. ^Dornbrush, Jonathan (January 17, 2021)."The (Mostly) Complete History of the PS4".IGN.RetrievedJanuary 17,2021.
  59. ^"Playstation Network Monthly Active Users Reaches 103 Million"(Press release). Sony. January 6, 2020.Archivedfrom the original on January 13, 2020.RetrievedJanuary 6,2020.
  60. ^abWhite, Sam (November 15, 2021)."How Xbox outgrew the console: inside Phil Spencer's multi-billion dollar gamble".GQ.RetrievedNovember 15,2021.
  61. ^Haigh, Marilyn (October 8, 2019)."Why Japanese gamers don't buy Xbox".CNBC.RetrievedOctober 31,2019.
  62. ^"PlayStation 4 vs Xbox One - Difference and Comparison | Diffen".www.diffen.com.Retrieved2021-12-27.
  63. ^"Battle for control: why the age-old console wars show no sign of stopping".The Guardian.2020-11-07.Retrieved2021-12-27.
  64. ^Browning, Kellen (September 15, 2020)."How Microsoft Is Ditching the Video Game Console Wars".The New York Times.RetrievedJune 10,2021.
  65. ^Browning, Kellen (June 10, 2021)."How Microsoft Is Ditching the Video Game Console Wars".The New York Times.RetrievedJune 10,2021.
  66. ^"PS5 Media remote | Control all your PS5 entertainment".PlayStation.Retrieved2021-12-26.
  67. ^Madhok, Diksha (January 19, 2022)."Sony takes a big hit in the console wars".CNN.RetrievedJanuary 20,2022.
  68. ^Subhan, Ishraq (September 15, 2022)."Sony:" Giving Microsoft control of Activision games like Call of Duty "has" major negative implications "".Eurogamer.RetrievedSeptember 15,2022.
  69. ^"Microsoft Admits Xbox Has 'Lost the Console Wars' as It Battles for $69 Billion Activision Blizzard Buyout".22 June 2023.
  70. ^abMason, Graeme (May 27, 2019)."40 years on, celebrating the Mattel Intellivision".Eurogamer.RetrievedMay 24,2024.
  71. ^abSpangler, Todd (May 23, 2024)."Atari Buys Intellivision Brand, Ending 'Longest-Running Console War in History'".Variety.RetrievedMay 23,2024.
  72. ^Baird, Kirk (November 10, 2013)."Fight for gaming consoles supremacy started with Atari vs. Intellivision".Toledo Blade.RetrievedMay 24,2024.
  73. ^Boellstorff, Tom; Soderman, Braxton (August 7, 2017). "Transplatform: Culture, Context, and the Intellivision/Atari VCS Rivalry".Games and Culture.14(6).doi:10.1177/1555412017721839.
  74. ^Dring, Christopher (May 23, 2024)."Atari acquires Intellivision brand and over 200 games".GamesIndustry.biz.RetrievedMay 23,2024.
  75. ^Parish, Jeremy (July 4, 2014)."Too Powerful for Its Own Good, Atari's Lynx Remains a Favorite 25 Years Later".USGamer.RetrievedFebruary 22,2021.
  76. ^Alt, Matt (November 12, 2020)."How Gunpei Yokoi Reinvented Nintendo".Vice.RetrievedFebruary 22,2021.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Console_war&oldid=1235022138"