Jump to content

Critical theory

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromCritical theorist)

Acritical theoryis any approach tohumanitiesandsocial philosophythat focuses on society and culture to attempt to reveal, critique, and challengepower structures.[1]With roots insociologyandliterary criticism,it argues thatsocial problemsstem more fromsocial structuresandcultural assumptionsthan from individuals.[citation needed]Some hold it to be an ideology,[2]others argue thatideologyis the principal obstacle to human liberation.[3]Critical theory finds applications in various fields of study, includingpsychoanalysis,film theory,literary theory,cultural studies,history,communication theory,philosophy,andfeminist theory.[4]

Critical Theory(capitalized) is aschool of thoughtpracticed by theFrankfurt SchooltheoreticiansHerbert Marcuse,Theodor Adorno,Walter Benjamin,Erich Fromm,andMax Horkheimer.Horkheimer described a theory as critical insofar as it seeks "toliberatehuman beings from the circumstances that enslave them ".[5]Although a product ofmodernism,and although many of the progenitors of Critical Theory were skeptical ofpostmodernism,Critical Theory is one of the major components of both modern and postmodern thought, and is widely applied in the humanities and social sciences today.[6][7][8]

In addition to its roots in the first-generation Frankfurt School, critical theory has also been influenced byGyörgy LukácsandAntonio Gramsci.Some second-generation Frankfurt School scholars have been influential, notablyJürgen Habermas.In Habermas's work, critical theory transcended its theoretical roots inGerman idealismand progressed closer toAmerican pragmatism.Concern for social "base and superstructure"is one of the remainingMarxistphilosophical concepts in much contemporary critical theory.[9]The legacy of Critical Theory as a major offshoot ofMarxismis controversial. The common thread linking Marxism and Critical theory is an interest in struggles to dismantle structures of oppression, exclusion, and domination.[10]Philosophical approaches within this broader definition includefeminism,critical race theory,post-structuralism,queer theoryand forms ofpostcolonialism.[11][12]

History

[edit]

Max Horkheimerfirst defined critical theory (‹See Tfd›German:Kritische Theorie) in his 1937 essay "Traditional and Critical Theory", as asocial theoryoriented towardcritiquingand changingsocietyas a whole, in contrast to traditional theory oriented only toward understanding or explaining it. Wanting to distinguish critical theory as a radical, emancipatory form ofMarxist philosophy,Horkheimer critiqued both the model of science put forward bylogical positivism,and what he and his colleagues saw as the covertpositivismandauthoritarianismoforthodox MarxismandCommunism.He described a theory ascriticalinsofar as it seeks "to liberate human beings from the circumstances that enslave them".[13]Critical theory involves anormativedimension, either by criticizing society in terms of some general theory ofvaluesor norms (oughts), or by criticizing society in terms of its own espoused values (i.e.immanent critique).[14]Significantly, critical theory not only conceptualizes and critiques societal power structures, but also establishes an empirically grounded model to link society to the human subject.[15]It defends the universalist ambitions of the tradition, but does so within a specific context of social-scientific and historical research.[15]

The core concepts of critical theory are that it should:

Postmoderncritical theory is another major product of critical theory. It analyzes the fragmentation ofcultural identitiesin order to challengemodernist-eraconstructs such asmetanarratives,rationality,and universal truths, while politicizing social problems "by situating them in historical and cultural contexts, to implicate themselves in the process of collecting and analyzing data, and to relativize their findings".[16]

Marx

[edit]

Marx explicitly developed the notion ofcritiqueinto thecritique of ideology,linking it with the practice ofsocial revolution,as stated in the 11th section of hisTheses on Feuerbach:"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point is to change it."[17]In early works, includingThe German Ideology,Marx developed his concepts of false consciousness and of ideology as the interests of one section of society masquerading as the interests of society as a whole.

Adorno and Horkheimer

[edit]

One of the distinguishing characteristics of critical theory, asTheodor W. AdornoandMax Horkheimerelaborated in theirDialectic of Enlightenment(1947), is an ambivalence about the ultimate source or foundation of social domination, an ambivalence that gave rise to the "pessimism"of the new critical theory about the possibility ofhuman emancipationandfreedom.[18]This ambivalence was rooted in the historical circumstances in which the work was originally produced, particularly the rise ofNazism,state capitalism,andculture industryas entirely new forms of social domination that could not be adequately explained in the terms of traditionalMarxist sociology.[19][20]

For Adorno and Horkheimer,state interventionin the economy had effectively abolished the traditional tension between Marxism's "relations of production"and" materialproductive forces"of society. The market (as an" unconscious "mechanism for the distribution of goods) had been replaced bycentralized planning.[21]

Contrary to Marx's prediction in thePreface to a Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy,this shift did not lead to "an era ofsocial revolution"but tofascismandtotalitarianism.As a result, critical theory was left, in Habermas's words, without "anything in reserve to which it might appeal, and when the forces of production enter into a baneful symbiosis with the relations of production that they were supposed to blow wide open, there is no longer any dynamism upon which critique could base its hope".[22]For Adorno and Horkheimer, this posed the problem of how to account for the apparent persistence of domination in the absence of the very contradiction that, according to traditional critical theory, was the source of domination itself.

Habermas

[edit]

In the 1960s,Habermas,a proponent ofcritical social theory,[23]raised theepistemologicaldiscussion to a new level in hisKnowledge and Human Interests(1968), by identifying criticalknowledgeas based on principles that differentiated it either from thenatural sciencesor thehumanities,through its orientation toself-reflectionand emancipation.[24]Although unsatisfied with Adorno and Horkheimer's thought inDialectic of Enlightenment,Habermas shares the view that, in the form ofinstrumental rationality,the era ofmodernitymarks a move away from the liberation of enlightenment and toward a new form of enslavement.[9]: 6 In Habermas's work, critical theory transcended its theoretical roots inGerman idealism,and progressed closer toAmerican pragmatism.

Habermas's ideas about the relationship between modernity andrationalizationare in this sense strongly influenced byMax Weber.He further dissolved the elements of critical theory derived fromHegelianGerman idealism,though his epistemology remains broadly Marxist. Perhaps his two most influential ideas are the concepts of thepublic sphereandcommunicative action,the latter arriving partly as a reaction to newpost-structuralor so-called "postmodern"challenges to the discourse of modernity. Habermas engaged in regular correspondence withRichard Rorty,and a strong sense of philosophicalpragmatismmay be felt in his thought, which frequently traverses the boundaries between sociology and philosophy.

Modern critical theorists

[edit]

Contemporary philosophers and researchers who have focused on understanding and critiquing critical theory includeNancy Fraser,Axel Honneth,Judith Butler,andRahel Jaeggi.Honneth is known for his worksPathology of ReasonandThe Legacy of Critical Theory,in which he attempts to explain critical theory's purpose in a modern context.[25][26]Jaeggi focuses on both critical theory's original intent and a more modern understanding that some argue has created a new foundation for modern usage of critical theory.[25]Butler contextualizes critical theory as a way to rhetorically challenge oppression and inequality, specifically concepts of gender.[27]

Honneth established a theory that many use to understand critical theory, thetheory of recognition.[28]In this theory, he asserts that in order for someone to be responsible for themselves and their own identity they must be also recognized by those around them: without recognition in this sense from peers and society, individuals can never become wholly responsible for themselves and others, nor experience true freedom and emancipation—i.e., without recognition, the individual cannot achieveself-actualization.

Like many others who put stock in critical theory, Jaeggi is vocal about capitalism's cost to society. Throughout her writings, she has remained doubtful about the necessity and use of capitalism in regard to critical theory.[29]Most of Jaeggi's interpretations of critical theory seem to work against the foundations of Habermas and follow more along the lines of Honneth in terms of how to look at the economy through the theory's lens.[30]She shares many of Honneth's beliefs, and many of her works try to defend them against criticism Honneth has received.[31]

To provide a dialectical opposite to Jaeggi's conception of alienation as 'a relation of relationlessness',Hartmut Rosahas proposed the concept ofresonance.[32][33]Rosa uses this term to refer to moments when late modern subjects experience momentary feelings ofself-efficacyin society, bringing them into a temporary moment of relatedness with some aspect of the world.[33]Rosa describes himself as working within the critical theory tradition of the Frankfurt School, providing an extensive critique of late modernity through his concept of social acceleration.[34]However his resonance theory has been questioned for moving too far beyond the Adornoian tradition of "looking coldly at society".[35]

Schools and Derivates

[edit]

Postmodern critical social theory

[edit]

Focusing onlanguage,symbolism, communication, andsocial construction,critical theory has been applied in the social sciences as a critique of social construction andpostmodern society.[7]

Whilemodernistcritical theory (as described above) concerns itself with "forms of authority and injustice that accompanied the evolution of industrial andcorporate capitalismas apolitical-economicsystem ",postmoderncritical theory politicizes social problems "by situating them in historical and cultural contexts, to implicate themselves in the process of collecting and analyzing data, and to relativize their findings".[16]Meaning itself is seen as unstable due to social structures' rapid transformation. As a result, research focuses on local manifestations rather than broad generalizations.

Postmodern critical research is also characterized by thecrisis of representation,which rejects the idea that a researcher's work is an "objective depiction of a stable other". Instead, many postmodern scholars have adopted "alternatives that encourage reflection about the 'politics and poetics' of their work. In these accounts, the embodied, collaborative, dialogic, and improvisational aspects of qualitative research are clarified."[36]

The termcritical theoryis oftenappropriatedwhen an author works insociologicalterms, yet attacks the social or human sciences, thus attempting to remain "outside" those frames of inquiry.Michel Foucaulthas been described as one such author.[37]Jean Baudrillardhas also been described as a critical theorist to the extent that he was an unconventional and critical sociologist;[38]this appropriation is similarly casual, holding little or no relation to theFrankfurt School.[39]In contrast, Habermas is one of the key critics of postmodernism.[40]

Communication studies

[edit]

When, in the 1970s and 1980s, Habermas redefinedcritical social theoryas astudy of communication,with communicative competence andcommunicative rationalityon the one hand, and distorted communication on the other, the two versions of critical theory began to overlap to a much greater degree than before.[citation needed]

[edit]
Critical legal studies(CLS) is a school of critical theory that developed in the United States during the 1970s.[41]CLS adherents claim that laws are devised to maintain thestatus quoof society and thereby codify itsbiases against marginalized groups.[42]

Immigration studies

[edit]

Critical theory can be used to interpret theright of asylum[43]andimmigration law.[44]

Critical finance studies

[edit]

Critical finance studies apply critical theory tofinancial marketsandcentral banks.[45]

Critical management studies

[edit]
Critical management studies(CMS) is a loose but extensive grouping of theoretically informed critiques ofmanagement,business and organisation, grounded originally in a critical theory perspective. Today it encompasses a wide range of perspectives that are critical of traditional theories of management and the business schools that generate these theories.

Critical international relations theory

[edit]
Critical international relations theoryis a diverse set of schools of thought ininternational relations(IR) that have criticized the theoretical, meta-theoretical and/or politicalstatus quo,both in IR theory and in international politics more broadly – frompositivistas well aspostpositivistpositions. Positivist critiques includeMarxistandneo-Marxistapproaches and certain ( "conventional" ) strands ofsocial constructivism.Postpositivist critiques includepoststructuralist,postcolonial,"critical" constructivist, critical theory (in the strict sense used by theFrankfurt School),neo-Gramscian,mostfeminist,and someEnglish Schoolapproaches, as well as non-Weberianhistorical sociology,[46]"international political sociology","critical geopolitics",and the so-called"new materialism"[47](partly inspired byactor–network theory). All of these latter approaches differ from bothrealismandliberalismin theirepistemologicalandontologicalpremises.

Critical race theory

[edit]
Critical race theory(CRT) is anacademic fieldfocused on the relationships betweensocial conceptionsofrace and ethnicity,social and politicallaws,and media. CRT also considersracismto besystemicin various laws and rules, not based only on individuals' prejudices.[48][49]The wordcriticalin the name is an academic reference to critical theory rather than criticizing or blaming individuals.[50][51]

Critical pedagogy

[edit]

Critical theorists have widely creditedPaulo Freirefor the first applications of critical theory to education/pedagogy,considering his best-known work to bePedagogy of the Oppressed,a seminal text in what is now known as the philosophy and social movement ofcritical pedagogy.[52][53]Dedicated to the oppressed and based on his own experience helping Brazilian adults learn to read and write, Freire includes a detailedMarxistclass analysisin his exploration of the relationship between the colonizer and the colonized. In the book, he calls traditional pedagogy the "banking model of education",because it treats the student as an empty vessel to be filled with knowledge. He argues that pedagogy should instead treat the learner as a co-creator of knowledge.

In contrast to the banking model, the teacher in the critical-theory model is not the dispenser of all knowledge, but a participant who learns with and from the students—in conversation with them, even as they learn from the teacher. The goal is to liberate the learner from an oppressive construct of teacher versus student, a dichotomy analogous to colonizer and colonized. It is not enough for the student to analyze societal power structures and hierarchies, to merely recognize imbalance and inequity; critical theory pedagogy must also empower the learner to reflect and act on that reflection to challenge an oppressive status quo.[52][54]

Critical consciousness

[edit]
Critical consciousness,conscientization, orconscientizaçãoinPortuguese(Portuguese pronunciation:[kõsjẽtʃizaˈsɐ̃w]), is a popular education and social concept developed by Brazilianpedagogueandeducational theoristPaulo Freire,grounded inneo-Marxistcritical theory. Critical consciousness focuses on achieving an in-depth understanding of the world, allowing for the perception and exposure of social and political contradictions. Critical consciousness also includes taking action against the oppressive elements in one's life that are illuminated by that understanding.[55]

Critical university studies

[edit]
Critical university studiesis a field examining the role ofhigher educationin contemporary society and its relation to culture, politics, and labor. Arising primarily fromcultural studies,it applies critical theory toward the university since the 1970s, particularly the shift away from a strongpublic modelof higher education to aneoliberalprivatizedmodel. Emerging largely in the United States, which has the most extensive system of higher education, the field has also seen significant work in the United Kingdom, as well as in other countries confronting neoliberalism. Key themes of CUS research arecorporatization,academic labor, andstudent debt,among other issues.

Critical psychology

[edit]
Critical psychologyis a perspective on psychology that draws extensively on critical theory. Critical psychology challenges the assumptions,theoriesand methods of mainstreampsychologyand attempts to apply psychological understandings in different ways.

Critical criminology

[edit]
Critical criminologyapplies critical theory tocriminology.Critical criminology examines the genesis of crime and the nature of justice in relation to factors such asclassandstatus,Law and the penal system are viewed as founded onsocial inequalityand meant to perpetuate such inequality.[56][57]Critical criminology also looks for possible biases in criminological research.[58]

Critical animal studies

[edit]
Critical animal studies(CAS) applies critical theory[59]toanimal studiesandanimal ethics.It emerged in 2001 with the founding of the Centre for Animal Liberation Affairs by Anthony J. Nocella II andSteven Best,which in 2007 became the Institute for Critical Animal Studies (ICAS).[60][61]The core interest of CAS isanimal ethics,firmly grounded in trans-speciesintersectionality,environmental justice,social justicepolitics and critical analysis of the underlying role played by thecapitalistsystem.[62]Scholars in the field seek to integrate academic research with political engagement and activism.

Critical social work

[edit]

Critical social workis the application tosocial workof a critical theory perspective. Criticalsocial workseeks to address social injustices, as opposed to focusing on individualized issues. Critical theories explain social problems as arising from various forms ofoppressionand injustice in globalized capitalist societies and forms of neoliberal governance.

This approach to social work theory is formed by a polyglot of theories from across thehumanitiesandsocial sciences,borrowing from various schools of thought, includinganarchism,anti-capitalism,anti-racism,Marxism,feminism,andsocial democracy.[63]

Critical ethnography

[edit]
Critical ethnographyapplies a critical theory based approach toethnography.It focuses on the implicit values expressed within ethnographic studies and, therefore, on the unacknowledged biases that may result from such implicit values.[64]It has been called critical theory in practice.[65]In the spirit of critical theory, this approach seeks to determine symbolic mechanisms, to extract ideology from action, and to understand the cognition and behaviour of research subjects within historical, cultural, and social frameworks.

Critical data studies

[edit]
Critical data studiesis the exploration of and engagement with social, cultural, and ethical challenges that arise when working with big data. It is through various unique perspectives and taking a critical approach that this form of study can be practiced.[66]As its name implies, critical data studies draws heavily on the influence of critical theory, which has a strong focus on addressing the organization of power structures. This idea is then applied to the study of data.

Critical environmental justice

[edit]

Critical environmental justiceapplies critical theory toenvironmental justice.[67]

Criticism

[edit]

While critical theorists have often been called Marxist intellectuals, their tendency to denounce some Marxist concepts and to combine Marxian analysis with other sociological and philosophical traditions has resulted in accusations ofrevisionismbyOrthodox Marxistand byMarxist–Leninistphilosophers.Martin Jayhas said that the first generation of critical theory is best understood not as promoting a specific philosophical agenda or ideology, but as "agadflyof other systems ".[68]

Critical theory has been criticized for not offering any clear road map to political action (praxis), often explicitly repudiating any solutions.[69]Those objections mostly apply to first-generation Frankfurt School, while the issue of politics is addressed in a much more assertive way in contemporary theory.[70]

Another criticism of critical theory "is that it fails to provide rational standards by which it can show that it is superior to other theories of knowledge, science, or practice."Rex Gibsonargues that critical theory suffers from being cliquish, conformist, elitist, immodest, anti-individualist, naive, too critical, and contradictory. Hughes and Hughes argue that Habermas' theory of ideal public discourse "says much about rational talkers talking, but very little about actors acting: Felt, perceptive, imaginative, bodily experience does not fit these theories".[71][72]

Some feminists argue that critical theory "can be as narrow and oppressive as the rationalization, bureaucratization, and cultures they seek to unmask and change.[71][72]

Critical theory's language has been criticized as being too dense to understand, although "Counter arguments to these issues of language include claims that a call for clearer and more accessible language is anti-intellectual, a new 'language of possibility' is needed, and oppressed peoples can understand and contribute to new languages."[72]

Bruce Pardy, writing for theNational Post,argued that any challenges to the "legitimacy [of critical theory] can be interpreted as a demonstration of their [critical theory's proponents'] thesis: the assertion of reason, logic and evidence is a manifestation of privilege and power. Thus, any challenger risks the stigma of a bigoted oppressor."[73]

Robert Danisch, writing forThe Conversation,argued that critical theory, and the modern humanities more broadly, focus too much on criticizing the current world rather than trying to make a better world.[74]

See also

[edit]

Lists

[edit]

Journals

[edit]

References

[edit]

Footnotes

[edit]
  1. ^"Critical theory".Britannica.Retrieved28 November2022.
  2. ^Disco, Cornelis. "Critical theory as ideology of the new class: Rereading Jürgen Habermas." Theory and Society (1979): 159-214.
  3. ^Geuss, Raymond (1981).The Idea of a Critical Theory.Cambridge University Press. pp. 2–3.ISBN0521240727.The very heart of the critical theory of society is its criticism of ideology. Their ideology is what prevents the agents in the society from correctly perceiving their true situation and real interests; if they are to free themselves from social repression, the agents must rid themselves of ideological illusion.
  4. ^"The Left Hemisphere".Verso.Retrieved18 May2023.
  5. ^Horkheimer 1982, 244.
  6. ^Ritzer, George (2008). "Sociological Theory".From Modern to Postmodern Social Theory (and Beyond).New York, New York:McGraw-HillHigher Education. pp. 567–568.
  7. ^abAgger, Ben (2012), "Ben Agger",North American Critical Theory After Postmodernism,Palgrave Macmillan,pp. 128–154,doi:10.1057/9781137262868_7,ISBN978-1349350391.
  8. ^Critical Theory and Society: A Reader.Routledge.1990.
  9. ^abOuthwaite, William (2009) [1988].Habermas: Key Contemporary Thinkers(2nd ed.). Polity. pp. 5–8.ISBN978-0745643281.
  10. ^Fuchs, Christian(2021). "What is Critical Theory?".Foundations of Critical Theory.Routledge.pp. 17–51.doi:10.1017/CBO9781139196598.007.
  11. ^Bohman, James; Flynn, Jeffrey; Celikates, Robin."Critical Theory".InZalta, Edward N.(ed.).Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy(Winter 2019 ed.).
  12. ^"Critical Theory Today: A User-Friendly Guide".Routledge&CRC Press.Retrieved18 May2023.
  13. ^Horkheimer 1982, p. 244.
  14. ^Bohman, James (8 March 2005)."Critical Theory".In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.).Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy(Fall 2016 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab,Stanford University.Archivedfrom the original on 13 June 2019.
  15. ^abBohman, James; Flynn, Jeffrey; Celikates, Robin (2021),"Critical Theory",in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.),The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy(Spring 2021 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab,Stanford University,retrieved10 June2022
  16. ^abLindlof & Taylor 2002,p.49:"forms of authority and injustice that accompanied the evolution of industrial and corporate capitalism as a political-economic system.
  17. ^"Theses on Feuerbach".§XI.Marxists Internet Archive.Archivedfrom the original on 16 April 2015.Retrieved11 April2015.{{cite web}}:CS1 maint: others (link)
  18. ^Adorno, Theodor W.,andMax Horkheimer.[1947] 2002.Dialectic of Enlightenment,translated by E. Jephcott. Stanford:Stanford University Press.p. 242.
  19. ^Habermas, Jürgen.1987. "The Entwinement of Myth and Enlightenment: Horkheimer and Adorno". InThe Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures,translated by F. Lawrence. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.p. 116: "Critical Theory was initially developed in Horkheimer's circle to think through political disappointments at the absence of revolution in the West, the development of Stalinism in Soviet Russia, and the victory of fascism in Germany. It was supposed to explain mistaken Marxist prognoses, but without breaking Marxist intentions."
  20. ^Dubiel, Helmut. 1985.Theory and Politics: Studies in the Development of Critical Theory,translated by B. Gregg. Cambridge, MA.
  21. ^Dialectic of Enlightenment.p. 38: "[G]one are the objective laws of the market which ruled in the actions of the entrepreneurs and tended toward catastrophe. Instead the conscious decision of the managing directors executes as results (which are more obligatory than the blindest price-mechanisms) the old law of value and hence the destiny of capitalism."
  22. ^"The Entwinement of Myth and Enlightenment", p. 118.
  23. ^Katsiaficas, George N.,Robert George Kirkpatrick, and Mary Lou Emery. 1987.Introduction to Critical Sociology.Irvington Publishers. p. 26.
  24. ^Laurie, Timothy, Hannah Stark, and Briohny Walker. 2019. "Critical Approaches to Continental Philosophy: Intellectual Community, Disciplinary Identity, and the Politics of Inclusion".Archived11 December 2019 at theWayback Machine.Parrhesia30:1–17.doi:10.1007/s10691-011-9167-4.(Discusses critical social theory as a form of self-reflection.)
  25. ^abFazio, Giorgio (21 May 2021). "Situating Rahel Jaeggi in the Contemporary Frankfurt Critical Theory".Critical Horizons.22(2): 116.doi:10.1080/14409917.2019.1676943.S2CID210490119.
  26. ^Nancy Fraser (1985). What’s critical about critical theory? The case of Habermas and gender. New German Critique, 35, 97-131.
  27. ^Gessen, Masha(9 February 2020)."Judith Butler Wants Us to Reshape Our Rage".The New Yorker.
  28. ^Boston, Timothy (May 2018). "New Directions for a Critical Theory of Work: Reading Honneth Through Deranty".Critical Horizons.19(2): 111.doi:10.1080/14409917.2018.1453287.S2CID149532362.
  29. ^Condon, Roderick (April 2021). "Nancy Fraser and Rahel Jaeggi, Capitalism: A Conversation in Critical Theory".Irish Journal of Sociology.29(1): 129.doi:10.1177/0791603520930989.hdl:10468/10810.S2CID225763936.
  30. ^Marco, Marco; Testa, Italo (May 2021)."Immanent Critique of Capitalism as a Form of Life: On Rahel Jaeggi's Critical Theory".Critical Horizons.22(2): 111.doi:10.1080/14409917.2020.1719630.S2CID214465382.
  31. ^Fazio, Giorgio (21 May 2021). "Situating Rahel Jaeggi in the Contemporary Frankfurt Critical Theory".Critical Horizons.22(2): 116.doi:10.1080/14409917.2019.1676943.S2CID210490119.
  32. ^Jaeggi, Rahel; Neuhouser, Frederick (2014).Alienation.New directions in critical theory. New York:Columbia University Press.ISBN978-0-231-15198-6.
  33. ^abRosa, Hartmut (2016).Resonanz: eine Soziologie der Weltbeziehung(3. Aufl ed.). Berlin: Suhrkamp.ISBN978-3-518-58626-6.
  34. ^Rosa, Hartmut (31 December 2013).Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity.Columbia University Press.doi:10.7312/rosa14834.ISBN978-0-231-51988-5.
  35. ^Brumlik, Micha (2016).Resonanz oder: Das Ende der kritischen Theorie[Resonance or: The end of critical theory.] (in German). pp. 120–123.
  36. ^Lindlof & Taylor 2002,p. 53.
  37. ^Rivera Vicencio, E. (2012)."Foucault: His influence over accounting and management research. Building of a map of Foucault's approach".International Journal of Critical Accounting.4(5/6): 728–756.doi:10.1504/IJCA.2012.051466.Archivedfrom the original on 9 September 2018.Retrieved4 July2015.
  38. ^"Introduction to Jean Baudrillard, Module on Postmodernity".www.cla.purdue.edu.Archivedfrom the original on 9 September 2018.Retrieved16 June2017.
  39. ^Kellner, Douglas (22 April 2005)."Jean Baudrillard".In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.).Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy(Winter 2015 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.Archivedfrom the original on 18 March 2019.
  40. ^Aylesworth, Gary."Postmodernism".InZalta, Edward N.(ed.).Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy(Spring 2015 ed.).
  41. ^"Critical Legal Theory",Cornell Law School> Retrieved 2017-08-10.
  42. ^Ingram, David (2021)."What an Ethics of Discourse and Recognition Can Contribute to a Critical Theory of Refugee Claim Adjudication: Reclaiming Epistemic Justice for Gender-Based Asylum Seekers"(PDF).Migration, Recognition and Critical Theory.Studies in Global Justice. Vol. 21. pp. 19–46.doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72732-1_2.ISBN978-3-030-72731-4.
  43. ^Pulitano, Elvira (2013)."In liberty's shadow: The discourse of refugees and asylum seekers in critical race theory and immigration law/Politics".Identities.20(2): 172–189.doi:10.1080/1070289X.2012.763168.
  44. ^Borch, Christian; Wosnitzer, Robert (2020).The Routledge Handbook of Critical Finance Studies.Routledge.doi:10.4324/9781315114255.ISBN9781315114255.
  45. ^See, e.g.,Hobden & Hobson 2002.
  46. ^See, e.g.,van der Tuin & Dolphijn 2012;Coole & Frost 2010;Connolly 2013.
  47. ^Wallace-Wells, Benjamin (18 June 2021)."How a Conservative Activist Invented the Conflict Over Critical Race Theory".The New Yorker.Retrieved19 June2021.
  48. ^Meckler, Laura; Dawsey, Josh (21 June 2021)."Republicans, spurred by an unlikely figure, see political promise in critical race theory".The Washington Post.Vol. 144.ISSN0190-8286.Retrieved19 June2021.
  49. ^Iati, Marisa (29 May 2021)."What is critical race theory, and why do Republicans want to ban it in schools?".The Washington Post.Rather than encouraging white people to feel guilty,Thomassaid critical race theorists aim to shift focus away from individual people's bad actions and toward how systems uphold racial disparities.
  50. ^Kahn, Chris (15 July 2021)."Many Americans embrace falsehoods about critical race theory".Reuters.Retrieved22 January2022.
  51. ^ab"Paulo Freire's Pedagogy of the Oppressed: Book Summary".The Educationist.9 July 2014.Archivedfrom the original on 28 March 2020.Retrieved4 June2020.
  52. ^For a history of the emergence of critical theory in the field of education, seeGottesman, Isaac (2016).The Critical Turn in Education: From Marxist Critique to Postructuralist Feminism to Critical Theories of Race.New York:Routledge.
  53. ^See, e.g.,Kołakowski, Leszek.[1976] 1979.Main Currents of Marxism3. W.W. Norton & Company.ISBN0393329437.ch. 10.
  54. ^Mustakova-Possardt, M (2003)"Is there a roadmap to critical consciousness? Critical Consciousness: A Study of Morality in Global, Historical Context."Archived2013-09-22 at theWayback MachineOne Country. 15(2).
  55. ^Online Dictionary of the Social Sciences,Critical Criminology.Athabasca UniversityandICAAP.Retrieved on: 2011-10-30.
  56. ^Meyer, Doug (March 2014). "Resisting Hate Crime Discourse: Queer and Intersectional Challenges to Neoliberal Hate Crime Laws".Critical Criminology.22(1): 113–125.doi:10.1007/s10612-013-9228-x.S2CID143546829.
  57. ^Uggen, Christopher; Inderbitzin, Michelle (2010). "Public criminologies".Criminology & Public Policy.9(4): 725–749.doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00666.x.Uggen, C. and Inderbitzin, M. (2010), Public criminologies. Criminology & Public Policy, 9: 725-749. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00666.x
  58. ^Allen, Michael, et al. Critical Animal Studies and Social Justice: Critical Theory, Dismantling Speciesism, and Total Liberation. Rowman & Littlefield, 2022.
  59. ^Taylor, Nik;Twine, Richard(2014). "Introduction: Locating the 'critical' in critical animal studies".The Rise of Critical Animal Studies: From the Margins to the Centre.Abingdon and New York: Routledge. p. 1.ISBN978-0415858571.
  60. ^"About".Institute for Critical Animal Studies (ICAS).Archivedfrom the original on 27 August 2010.Retrieved27 July2020.
  61. ^Nibert, David,ed. (2017).Animal Oppression and Capitalism.Praeger Publishing.p. xvii.ISBN978-1440850738.
  62. ^Original material adapted from presentation by M. Hanlon, School of Social Work,ACU
  63. ^Soyini Madison, D. (2005). Critical ethnography: method, ethics, and performance. Retrieved fromhttp://www.sagepub.com/upm-data/4957_Madison_I_Proof_Chapter_1.pdf
  64. ^Thomas, J. (1993). Doing critical ethnography. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  65. ^Dalton, Craig; Thatcher, Jim (12 May 2014)."What does a Critical Data Studies look like and why do we care?".Society + Space.Retrieved17 January2018.
  66. ^Vermeylen, Saskia (2019). "Special issue: environmental justice and epistemic violence".Local Environment.24(2): 89–93.Bibcode:2019LoEnv..24...89V.doi:10.1080/13549839.2018.1561658.ISSN1354-9839.
  67. ^Jay, Martin (1996).The Dialectical Imagination: A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research, 1923–1950.University of California Press.p. 41.ISBN978-0520204232.Archivedfrom the original on 28 October 2020.Retrieved7 May2020.
  68. ^Corradetti, Claudio. "The Frankfurt School and Critical Theory".Archived18 February 2018 at theWayback Machine.Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  69. ^Bohmann, Ulf; Sörensen, Paul (20 June 2022)."Exploring a Critical Theory of politics".Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais.22:e42204.doi:10.15448/1984-7289.2022.1.42204.ISSN1984-7289.S2CID249915438.
  70. ^ab"Understanding Critical Theory".3 November 2022.Retrieved25 June2023.
  71. ^abc"9.8 PROBLEMS WITH CRITICAL THEORIES OF EDUCATION".members.aect.org.Retrieved25 June2023.
  72. ^Pardy, Bruce (24 June 2023)."How Canada's secular religion of cultural self-hate took hold".National Post.
  73. ^Danisch, Robert (10 January 2023)."The humanities should teach about how to make a better world, not just criticize the existing one".The Conversation.Retrieved25 June2023.

Works cited

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]

Archival collections

[edit]