Jump to content

Oil sands

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromCrude bitumen)

TheAthabasca oil sandsinAlberta,Canada, are a very large source ofbitumen,which can beupgradedtosynthetic crudeheavy oil,Western Canadian Select(WCS)
Tar sandstone fromCalifornia,United States

Oil sands,tar sands,crude bitumen,orbituminous sands,are a type ofunconventional petroleum deposit.Oil sands are either loose sands or partially consolidated sandstone containing a naturally occurring mixture ofsand,clay,and water, soaked withbitumen,a dense and extremelyviscousform ofpetroleum.

Significant bitumen deposits are reported inCanada,[1][2]Kazakhstan,Russia,andVenezuela.The estimated worldwide deposits of oil are more than 2 trillion barrels (320 billion cubic metres);[3]Proven reserves of bitumen contain approximately 100 billion barrels,[4]and total natural bitumen reserves are estimated at 249.67 Gbbl (39.694×10^9m3) worldwide, of which 176.8 Gbbl (28.11×10^9m3), or 70.8%, are in Alberta, Canada.[1]

Crude bitumen is a thick, sticky form of crude oil, and is so viscous that it will not flow unless heated or diluted with lighter hydrocarbons such aslight crude oilornatural-gas condensate.At room temperature, it is much like coldmolasses.[5]TheOrinoco Beltin Venezuela is sometimes described as oil sands, but these deposits are non-bituminous, falling instead into the category ofheavy or extra-heavy oildue to their lower viscosity.[6]Natural bitumen and extra-heavy oil differ in the degree by which they have been degraded from the original conventional oils bybacteria.

The1973and1979oil price increases, and the development of improved extraction technology enabled profitable extraction and processing of the oil sands. Together with other so-calledunconventional oilextraction practices, oil sands are implicated in theunburnable carbondebate but also contribute toenergy securityand counteract the international price cartelOPEC.According to the Oil Climate Index, carbon emissions fromoil-sand crudeare 31% higher than from conventional oil.[7]In Canada, oil sands production in general, and in-situ extraction, in particular, are the largest contributors to the increase in the nation'sgreenhouse gas emissionsfrom 2005 to 2017, according toNatural Resources Canada(NRCan).[8]

History

[edit]

The exploitation of bituminous deposits andseepsdates back toPaleolithictimes.[9]The earliest known use of bitumen was byNeanderthals,some 40,000 years ago. Bitumen has been found adhering tostone toolsused by Neanderthals at sites in Syria. After the arrival ofHomo sapiens,humans used bitumen for construction of buildings and waterproofing ofreed boats,among other uses. In ancient Egypt, the use of bitumen was important in preparingmummies.[10]

In ancient times, bitumen was primarily aMesopotamiancommodity used by theSumeriansandBabylonians,although it was also found in theLevantandPersia.The area along theTigrisandEuphrates riverswas littered with hundreds of pure bitumen seepages. The Mesopotamians used the bitumen for waterproofing boats and buildings. In Europe, they were extensively mined near the French city ofPechelbronn,where the vapour separation process was in use in 1742.[11][12]

In Canada, theFirst Nationpeoples had used bitumen from seeps along theAthabascaandClearwater Riversto waterproof theirbirch barkcanoesfrom early prehistoric times. The Canadian oil sands first became known to Europeans in 1719 when aCreenative named Wa-Pa-Su brought a sample toHudson's Bay Companyfur traderHenry Kelsey,who commented on it in his journals. Fur trader Peter Pond paddled down the Clearwater River to Athabasca in 1778, saw the deposits and wrote of "springs of bitumen that flow along the ground". In 1787, fur trader and explorerAlexander MacKenzieon his way to the Arctic Ocean saw the Athabasca oil sands, and commented, "At about 24 miles from the fork (of the Athabasca and Clearwater Rivers) are some bituminous fountains into which a pole of 20 feet long may be inserted without the least resistance."[13]

Cost of oil sands petroleum-mining operations

[edit]

In their May 2019 comparison of the "cost of supply curve update" in which the Norway-based Rystad Energy—an "independent energy research and consultancy" —ranked the "worlds total recoverable liquid resources by their breakeven price", Rystad reported that the average breakeven price for oil from the oil sands was US$83 in 2019, making it the most expensive to produce, compared to all other "significant oil producing regions" in the world.[14][a]TheInternational Energy Agencymade similar comparisons.[15]

The price perbarrelof heavier,sour crude oilslacking in tidewater access—such asWestern Canadian Select(WCS) from the Athabaska oil sands, are priced at a differential to the lighter,sweeter oil—such asWest Texas Intermediate(WTI). Thepriceis based on its grade—determined by factors such as its specific gravity orAPIand its sulfur content—and its location—for example, its proximity totidewaterand/or refineries.

Because the cost of production is so much higher at oil sands petroleum-mining operations, the breakeven point is much higher than for sweeter lighter oils like that produced bySaudi Arabia,Iran,Iraq,and, the United States.[14]Oil sands productions expand and prosper as the global price of oil increased to peak highs because of theArab oil embargo of 1973,the 1979Iranian Revolution,the1990 Persian Gulf crisis and war,the11 September 2001 attacks,and the2003 invasion of Iraq.[16]The boom periods were followed by the bust, as the global price of oil dropped during the1980sand again in the 1990s, during a period of global recessions, and again in 2003.[17]

Nomenclature

[edit]

The nametar sandswas applied to bituminous sands in the late 19th and early 20th century.[18]People who saw the bituminous sands during this period were familiar with the large amounts of tar residue produced in urban areas as aby-productof the manufacture ofcoal gasfor urban heating and lighting.[19]The word "tar"to describe these natural bitumen deposits is really a misnomer, since, chemically speaking, tar is ahuman-madesubstance produced by thedestructive distillationoforganic material,usuallycoal.[20]

Since then, coal gas has almost completely been replaced bynatural gasas a fuel, andcoal taras a material forpaving roadshas been replaced by the petroleum productasphalt.Naturally occurring bitumen is chemically more similar to asphalt than to coal tar, and the termoil sands(or oilsands) is more commonly used by industry in the producing areas thantar sandsbecausesynthetic oilis manufactured from the bitumen,[20]and due to the feeling that the terminology oftar sandsis less politically acceptable to the public.[21]Oil sands are now an alternative to conventional crude oil.[22]

Geology

[edit]

The world's largest deposits of oil sands are in Venezuela and Canada. The geology of the deposits in the two countries is generally rather similar. They are vastheavy oil,extra-heavy oil, and/or bitumen deposits with oil heavier than 20°API, found largely inunconsolidatedsandstoneswith similar properties. "Unconsolidated" in this context means that the sands have high porosity, no significant cohesion, and a tensile strength close to zero. The sands are saturated with oil which has prevented them from consolidating into hard sandstone.[6]

Size of resources

[edit]

The magnitude of the resources in the two countries is on the order of 3.5 to 4 trillion barrels (550 to 650 billion cubic metres) of originaloil in place(OOIP).[23][24]Oil in place is not necessarilyoil reserves,and the amount that can be produced depends ontechnological evolution.Rapidtechnological developmentsin Canada in the 1985–2000 period resulted in techniques such assteam-assisted gravity drainage(SAGD) that can recover a much greaterpercentage of the OOIPthan conventional methods. The Alberta government estimates that with current technology, 10% of its bitumen and heavy oil can be recovered, which would give it about 200 billion barrels (32 billion m3) of recoverable oil reserves. Venezuela estimates its recoverable oil at 267 billion barrels (42 billion m3).[6]This places Canada and Venezuela in the same league as Saudi Arabia, having the threelargest oil reserves in the world.

Major deposits

[edit]

There are numerous deposits of oil sands in the world, but the biggest and most important are in Canada and Venezuela, with lesser deposits in Kazakhstan and Russia. The total volume of non-conventional oil in the oil sands of these countries exceeds the reserves of conventional oil in all other countries combined. Vast deposits of bitumen—over 350 billion cubic metres (2.2 trillion barrels) ofoil in place—exist in the Canadian provinces ofAlbertaandSaskatchewan.If 30% of this oil could be extracted, it could supply the entire needs ofNorth Americafor over 100 years at 2002 consumption levels. These deposits represent plentiful oil, but not cheap oil. They require advanced technology toextractthe oil andtransportit tooil refineries.[25]

Canada

[edit]

The oil sands of the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin (WCSB) are a result of the formation of theCanadian Rocky Mountainsby thePacific Plateoverthrusting theNorth American Plateas it pushed in from the west, carrying the formerly large island chains which nowcompose most of British Columbia.The collision compressed the Alberta plains andraised the Rockiesabove the plains, formingmountain ranges.This mountain building process buried thesedimentary rocklayers which underlie most of Albertato a great depth,creating high subsurface temperatures, and producing agiant pressure cookereffect that converted thekerogenin the deeply buriedorganic-rich shalesto light oil and natural gas.[6][26]Thesesource rockswere similar to the American so-calledoil shales,except the latter have never been buried deep enough to convert the kerogen in them into liquid oil.

This overthrusting also tilted the pre-Cretaceoussedimentary rock formations underlying most of the sub-surface of Alberta,depressingthe rock formations in southwest Alberta up to 8 km (5 mi) deep near the Rockies, but to zero depth in the northeast, where they pinched out against theigneous rocksof theCanadian Shield,which outcrop on the surface. This tilting is not apparent on the surface because the resulting trench has been filled in by eroded material from the mountains. The light oil migrated up-dip through hydro-dynamic transport from the Rockies in the southwest toward the Canadian Shield in the northeast following a complex pre-Cretaceousunconformitythat exists in the formations under Alberta. The total distance of oil migration southwest to northeast was about 500 to 700 km (300 to 400 mi). At the shallow depths of sedimentary formations in the northeast, massivemicrobial biodegradationas theoil approached the surfacecaused the oil to become highlyviscousand immobile. Almost all of the remaining oil is found in the far north of Alberta, in Middle Cretaceous (115 million-year old)sand-silt-shale depositsoverlain by thick shales, although large amounts of heavy oil lighter than bitumen are found in the Heavy Oil Belt along the Alberta-Saskatchewan border, extending into Saskatchewan and approaching the Montana border. Note that, although adjacent to Alberta, Saskatchewan has no massive deposits of bitumen, only large reservoirs of heavy oil >10°API.[6][26]

Most of the Canadian oil sands are in three major deposits in northern Alberta. They are theAthabasca-Wabiskaw oil sandsof north northeastern Alberta, theCold Lakedeposits of east northeastern Alberta, and thePeace Riverdeposits of northwestern Alberta. Between them, they cover over 140,000 square kilometres (54,000 sq mi)—an area larger thanEngland—and contain approximately 1.75 Tbbl (280×10^9m3) of crudebitumenin them. About 10% of theoil in place,or 173 Gbbl (27.5×10^9m3), is estimated by thegovernment of Albertato be recoverable at current prices, using current technology, which amounts to 97% of Canadian oil reserves and 75% of total North American petroleum reserves.[2]Although the Athabasca deposit is the only one in the world which has areas shallow enough to mine from the surface, all three Alberta areas are suitable for production usingin-situmethods, such as cyclic steam stimulation (CSS) andsteam-assisted gravity drainage(SAGD).

The largest Canadian oil sands deposit, theAthabasca oil sandsis in theMcMurray Formation,centered on the city ofFort McMurray, Alberta.It outcrops on the surface (zero burial depth) about 50 km (30 mi) north of Fort McMurray, where enormous oil sands mines have been established, but is 400 m (1,300 ft) deep southeast of Fort McMurray. Only 3% of the oil sands area containing about 20% of the recoverable oil can be produced bysurface mining,so the remaining 80% will have to be produced usingin-situwells. The other Canadian deposits are between 350 and 900 m (1,000 and 3,000 ft) deep and will require in-situ production.[6][26]

Athabasca
[edit]
The City of Fort McMurray on the banks of the Athabasca River

TheAthabasca oil sands,also known as the Athabasca tar sands, are large deposits ofbitumen,a heavy and viscous form of petroleum, located in northeasternAlberta,Canada. These reserves are one of the largest sources ofunconventional oilin the world, making Canada a significant player in the global energy market.[27]

As of 2023, Canada's oil sands industry, along with Western Canada and offshore petroleum facilities near Newfoundland and Labrador, continued to increase production and were projected to increase by an estimated 10% in 2024 representing a potential record high at the end of the year of approximately 5.3 million barrels per day (bpd).[28]The surge in production is attributed mainly to growth in Alberta's oilsands.[28]The expansion of theTrans Mountain pipeline—the only oil pipeline to the West Coast—will further facilitate this increase, with its capacity set to increase significantly, to 890,000 barrels per day from 300,000 bpd currently.[29][28]Despite this growth, there are warnings that it might be short-lived, with production potentially plateauing after 2024.[28]Canada's anticipated increase in oil output exceeds that of other major producers like the United States, and the country is poised to become a significant driver of global crude oil production growth in 2024.[28]The exploitation of these resources has stirred debates regarding economic development, energy security, and environmental impacts, particularly emissions from the oilsands, prompting discussions around emissions regulations for the oil and gas sector.[28][30][31][32][33][34][35]

The Athabaska oil sands, along with the nearbyPeace RiverandCold Lake depositsoil sand deposits lie under 141,000 square kilometres (54,000 sq mi) ofboreal forestandmuskeg(peatbogs) according to Government of Alberta's Ministry of Energy,[36]Alberta Energy Regulator(AER) and theCanadian Association of Petroleum Producers(CAPP).
Cold Lake
[edit]
Cold Lake viewed fromMeadow Lake Provincial Park,Saskatchewan

The Cold Lake oil sands are northeast of Alberta's capital,Edmonton,near the border with Saskatchewan. A small portion of the Cold Lake deposit lies in Saskatchewan. Although smaller than the Athabasca oil sands, the Cold Lake oil sands are important because some of the oil isfluidenough to be extracted by conventional methods. The Cold Lake bitumen contains morealkanesand lessasphaltenesthan the other major Alberta oil sands and the oil is more fluid.[37]As a result, cyclic steam stimulation (CSS) is commonly used for production.

The Cold Lake oil sands are of a roughly circular shape, centered aroundBonnyville, Alberta.They probably contain over 60 billion cubic metres (370 billion barrels) of extra-heavy oil-in-place. The oil is highly viscous, but considerably less so than the Athabasca oil sands, and is somewhat lesssulfurous.The depth of the deposits is 400 to 600 metres (1,300 to 2,000 ft) and they are from 15 to 35 metres (49 to 115 ft) thick.[25]They are too deep tosurface mine.

Much of the oil sands are onCanadian Forces Base Cold Lake.CFB Cold Lake'sCF-18 Hornetjet fighters defend the western half of Canadian air space and cover Canada's Arctic territory. Cold Lake Air Weapons Range (CLAWR) is one of the largest live-drop bombing ranges in the world, including testing of cruise missiles. As oil sands production continues to grow, various sectors vie for access to airspace, land, and resources, and this complicates oil well drilling and production significantly.

Peace River
[edit]
The Peace River oil sands deposit lies in the west of Alberta, and is deeper than the larger, better knownAthabasca oil sands.

Located in northwest-centralAlberta,thePeace River oil sandsdeposit is the smallest of four large deposits of oil sands[38]of theWestern Canadian Sedimentary Basinformation.[38]

The Peace River oil sands lie, generally, in the watershed of thePeace River.

The Peace River oil sands deposits are the smallest in the province. The largest, theAthabasca oil sands,are located to the east. The second largest the,Cold Lake oil sandsdeposit is south of Athabaska and theWabasco oil sandsare south of Athabaska and usually linked to it.[38]According to thePetroleum Economist,oil sands occur in more than 70 countries, but the bulk is found in these four regions together covering an area of some 77,000 square kilometres (30,000 sq mi).[39]In 2007 theWorld Energy Councilestimated that these oil sands areas contained at least two-thirds of the world's discoveredbitumenin place at the time,[40]with an original oil-in-place (OOIP) reserve of 260,000,000,000 cubic metres (9.2×1012cu ft) (1.6 trnbarrels), an amount comparable to the total world reserves of conventional oil.

Whereas the Athabasca oil sands lie close enough to the surface that the sand can be scooped up inopen-pit mines,and brought to a central location for processing, the Peace River deposits are considered too deep, and are exploited in situ usingsteam-assisted gravity drainage(SAGD) and Cold Heavy Oil Production with Sand (CHOPS).[41]

Venezuela

[edit]

TheEastern Venezuelan Basinhas a structure similar to the WCSB, but on a shorter scale. The distance the oil has migrated up-dip from the Sierra Oriental mountain front to theOrinoco oil sandswhere it pinches out against the igneous rocks of theGuyana Shieldis only about 200 to 300 km (100 to 200 mi). The hydrodynamic conditions of oil transport were similar,source rocksburied deep by the rise of the mountains of the Sierra Orientale produced light oil that moved up-dip toward the south until it was gradually immobilized by the viscosity increase caused by biodgradation near the surface. The Orinoco deposits are earlyTertiary(50 to 60 million years old) sand-silt-shale sequences overlain by continuous thick shales, much like the Canadian deposits.

In Venezuela, theOrinoco Beltoil sands range from 350 to 1,000 m (1,000 to 3,000 ft) deep and no surface outcrops exist. The deposit is about 500 km (300 mi) long east-to-west and 50 to 60 km (30 to 40 mi) wide north-to-south, much less than the combined area covered by the Canadian deposits. In general, the Canadian deposits are found over a much wider area, have a broader range of properties, and have a broader range of reservoir types than the Venezuelan ones, but the geological structures and mechanisms involved are similar. The main differences is that the oil in the sands in Venezuela is less viscous than in Canada, allowing some of it to be produced by conventional drilling techniques, but none of it approaches the surface as in Canada, meaning none of it can be produced using surface mining. The Canadian deposits will almost all have to be produced by mining or using new non-conventional techniques.

Orinoco
[edit]
Panorama of the Orinoco River

The Orinoco Belt is a territory in the southern strip of the easternOrinoco RiverBasin inVenezuelawhich overlies one of the world's largest deposits of petroleum. The Orinoco Belt follows the line of the river. It is approximately 600 kilometres (370 mi) from east to west, and 70 kilometres (43 mi) from north to south, with an area about 55,314 square kilometres (21,357 sq mi).

The oil sands consist of large deposits of extraheavy crude.Venezuela's heavy oil deposits of about 1,200 Gbbl (190×10^9m3) ofoil in placeare estimated to approximately equal the world's reserves of lighter oil.[1]

In 2009, theUS Geological Survey(USGS) increased its estimates of the reserves to 513 Gbbl (81.6×10^9m3) of oil which is "technically recoverable (producible using currently available technology and industry practices)." No estimate of how much of the oil is economically recoverable was made.[42]

Other deposits

[edit]
Location of Melville Island

In addition to the three major Canadian oil sands in Alberta, there is a fourth major oil sands deposit in Canada, theMelville Island oil sandsin theCanadian Arctic islands,which are too remote to expect commercial production in the foreseeable future.

Apart from the megagiant[43]oil sands deposits in Canada and Venezuela, numerous other countries hold smaller oil sands deposits. In the United States, there are supergiant[43]oil sands resources primarily concentrated in EasternUtah,with a total of 32 Gbbl (5.1×10^9m3) of oil (known and potential) in eight major deposits inCarbon,Garfield,Grand,Uintah,andWaynecounties.[44]In addition to being much smaller than the Canadian oil sands deposits, the US oil sands are hydrocarbon-wet, whereas the Canadian oil sands are water-wet.[45]This requires somewhat different extraction techniques for the Utah oil sands from those used for the Alberta oil sands.

Russia holds oil sands in two main regions. Large resources are present in theTunguska Basin,East Siberia,with the largest deposits beingOlenyokandSiligir.Other deposits are located in theTiman-Pechoraand Volga-Urals basins (in and aroundTatarstan), which is an important but very mature province in terms of conventional oil, holds large amounts of oil sands in a shallow Permian formation.[1][46]In Kazakhstan, large bitumen deposits are located in the North Caspian Basin.

In Madagascar,TsimiroroandBemolangaare two heavy oil sands deposits, with a pilot well already producing small amounts of oil in Tsimiroro.[47]and larger scale exploitation in the early planning phase.[48]In the Republic of the Congo reserves are estimated between 0.5 and 2.5 Gbbl (79×10^6and 397×10^6m3).

Production

[edit]

Bituminous sands are a major source of unconventional oil, although only Canada has a large-scale commercial oil sands industry. In 2006, bitumen production in Canada averaged 1.25 Mbbl/d (200,000 m3/d) through 81 oil sands projects. 44% of Canadian oil production in 2007 was from oil sands.[49]This proportion was (as of 2008) expected to increase in coming decades as bitumen production grows while conventional oil production declines, although due to the 2008 economic downturn work on new projects has been deferred.[2]Petroleum is not produced from oil sands on a significant level in other countries.[45]

Canada

[edit]

The Alberta oil sands have been in commercial production since the originalGreat Canadian Oil Sands(nowSuncor Energy) mine began operation in 1967.Syncrude's second mine began operation in 1978 and is the biggest mine of any type in the world. The third mine in the Athabasca Oil Sands, theAlbian Sandsconsortium ofShell Canada,Chevron Corporation,and Western Oil Sands Inc. (purchased byMarathon Oil Corporationin 2007) began operation in 2003.Petro-Canadawas also developing a $33 billion Fort Hills Project, in partnership with UTS Energy Corporation andTeck Cominco,which lost momentum after the 2009 merger of Petro-Canada into Suncor.[50]

By 2013 there were nine oil sands mining projects in the Athabasca oil sands deposit: Suncor Energy Inc. (Suncor), Syncrude Canada Limited (Syncrude)'s Mildred Lake and Aurora North, Shell Canada Limited (Shell)'s Muskeg River and Jackpine, Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNRL)'s Horizon, Imperial Oil Resources Ventures Limited (Imperial), Kearl Oil Sands Project (KOSP), Total E&P Canada Ltd. Joslyn North Mine and Fort Hills Energy Corporation (FHEC).[51]In 2011 alone they produced over 52 million cubic metres of bitumen.[51]

Canadian oil sand extraction has created extensive environmental damage, and many first nations peoples, scientists, lawyers, journalists and environmental groups have described Canadian oil sands mining as anecocide.[52][53][54][55][56][57]

From the beginning of 2022 oil sands extraction in Alberta has sharply increased, overpassing by far the level of 2014. High oil prices is one of the causes.[58]In 2024 it is projected to increase more, so Canada can become a leader in oil production.[59]

Venezuela

[edit]

No significant development of Venezuela's extra-heavy oil deposits was undertaken before 2000, except for the BITOR operation which produced somewhat less than 100,000 barrels of oil per day (16,000 m3/d) of 9°API oil by primary production. This was mostly shipped as an emulsion (Orimulsion) of 70% oil and 30% water with similar characteristics asheavy fuel oilfor burning in thermal power plants.[6]However, when a major strike hit the Venezuelan state oil companyPDVSA,most of the engineers were fired as punishment.[citation needed]Orimulsion had been the pride of the PDVSA engineers, so Orimulsion fell out of favor with the key political leaders. As a result, the government has been trying to "Wind Down" the Orimulsion program.[citation needed]

Despite the fact that the Orinoco oil sands contain extra-heavy oil which is easier to produce than Canada's similarly sized reserves of bitumen, Venezuela's oil production has been declining in recent years because of the country's political and economic problems, while Canada's has been increasing. As a result, Canadian heavy oil and bitumen exports have been backing Venezuelan heavy and extra-heavy oil out of the US market, and Canada's total exports of oil to the US have become several times as great as Venezuela's.

By 2016, with theeconomy of Venezuelain a tailspin and the country experiencing widespread shortages of food, rolling power blackouts, rioting, and anti-government protests, it was unclear how much new oil sands production would occur in the near future.[60]

Other countries

[edit]

In May 2008, theItalianoil companyEniannounced a project to develop a small oil sands deposit in theRepublic of the Congo.Production is scheduled to commence in 2014 and is estimated to eventually yield a total of 40,000 bbl/d (6,400 m3/d).[61]

Methods of extraction

[edit]

Except for a fraction of the extra-heavy oil or bitumen which can be extracted by conventional oil well technology, oil sands must be produced bystrip miningor the oil made to flow into wells using sophisticatedin-situtechniques. These methods usually use more water and require larger amounts of energy than conventional oil extraction. While much of Canada's oil sands are being produced usingopen-pit mining,approximately 90% of Canadian oil sands and all of Venezuela's oil sands are too far below the surface to use surface mining.[62]

Primary production

[edit]

Conventional crude oil is normally extracted from the ground by drillingoil wellsinto apetroleum reservoir,allowing oil to flow into them under natural reservoir pressures, althoughartificial liftand techniques such ashorizontal drilling,water floodingand gas injection are often required to maintain production. When primary production is used in the Venezuelan oil sands, where the extra-heavy oil is about 50 degreesCelsius,the typical oil recovery rates are about 8–12%. Canadian oil sands are much colder and more biodegraded, so bitumen recovery rates are usually only about 5–6%. Historically, primary recovery was used in the more fluid areas of Canadian oil sands. However, it recovered only a small fraction of theoil in place,so it is not often used today.[63]

Surface mining

[edit]
Mining operations in the Athabasca oil sands. NASAEarth Observatoryimage, 2009.

TheAthabasca oil sandsare the only major oil sands deposits which are shallow enough to surface mine. In the Athabasca sands there are very large amounts ofbitumencovered by littleoverburden,making surface mining the most efficient method of extracting it. The overburden consists of water-ladenmuskeg(peat bog) overtop of clay and barren sand. The oil sands themselves are typically 40 to 60 metres (130 to 200 ft) thick deposits of crude bitumen embedded in unconsolidatedsandstone,sitting on top of flatlimestonerock. SinceGreat Canadian Oil Sands(nowSuncor Energy) started operation of the first large-scale oil sands mine in 1967, bitumen has been extracted on a commercial scale and the volume has grown at a steady rate ever since.

A large number of oil sands mines are currently in operation and more are in the stages of approval or development. TheSyncrude Canadamine was the second to open in 1978,Shell Canadaopened itsMuskeg River mine (Albian Sands)in 2003 andCanadian Natural ResourcesLtd (CNRL) opened itsHorizon Oil Sandsproject in 2009. Newer mines include Shell Canada's Jackpine mine,[64]Imperial Oil'sKearl Oil Sands Project,the Synenco Energy (now owned byTotalEnergies) Northern Lights mine, and Suncor's Fort Hills mine.

Oil sands tailings ponds

[edit]
Syncrude's Mildred Lake site, plant and tailings pondsFort McMurray,Alberta

Oil sands tailings pondsare engineered dam and dyke systems that contain salts, suspended solids and other dissolvable chemical compounds such asnaphthenic acids,benzene,hydrocarbons[65]residualbitumen,fine silts (mature fine tails MFT), and water.[66]Large volumes of tailings are a byproduct of surface mining of the oil sands and managing these tailings are one of the most damaging aspects of tar sands.[66]The Government of Alberta reported in 2013 that tailings ponds in the Alberta oil sands covered an area of about 77 square kilometres (30 sq mi).[66]TheSyncrude Tailings Damor Mildred Lake Settling Basin (MLSB) is anembankment damthat is, by volume of construction material, the largestearth structurein the world in 2001.[67]

Cold Heavy Oil Production with Sand (CHOPS)

[edit]

Some years ago Canadian oil companies discovered that if they removed thesandfilters from heavy oil wells and produced as much sand as possible with the oil, production rates improved significantly. This technique became known as Cold Heavy Oil Production with Sand (CHOPS). Further research disclosed that pumping out sand opened "wormholes" in the sand formation which allowed more oil to reach thewellbore.The advantage of this method is better production rates and recovery (around 10% versus 5–6% with sand filters in place) and the disadvantage thatdisposingof the produced sand is a problem. A novel way to do this was spreading it onrural roads,which rural governments liked because theoily sandreduced dust and the oil companies did theirroad maintenancefor them. However, governments have become concerned about the large volume and composition of oil spread on roads.[68]so in recent years disposing of oily sand in undergroundsalt cavernshas become more common.

Cyclic Steam Stimulation (CSS)

[edit]

The use ofsteaminjection to recover heavy oil has been in use in the oil fields of California since the 1950s. The cyclic steam stimulation (CSS) "huff-and-puff" method is now widely used in heavy oil production worldwide due to its quick early production rates; however recovery factors are relatively low (10–40% of oil in place) compared to SAGD (60–70% of OIP).[69]

CSS has been in use byImperial Oilat Cold Lake since 1985 and is also used byCanadian Natural Resourcesat Primrose and Wolf Lake and byShell Canadaat Peace River. In this method, the well is put through cycles of steam injection, soak, and oil production. First, steam is injected into a well at a temperature of 300 to 340 degreesCelsiusfor a period of weeks to months; then, the well is allowed to sit for days to weeks to allow heat to soak into the formation; and, later, the hot oil is pumped out of the well for a period of weeks or months. Once the production rate falls off, the well is put through another cycle of injection, soak and production. This process is repeated until the cost of injecting steam becomes higher than the money made from producing oil.[70]

Steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD)

[edit]

Steam-assisted gravity drainagewas developed in the 1980s by theAlberta Oil Sands Technology and Research Authorityand fortuitously coincided with improvements indirectional drillingtechnology that made it quick and inexpensive to do by the mid 1990s. In SAGD, two horizontal wells are drilled in the oil sands, one at the bottom of the formation and another about 5 metres above it. These wells are typicallydrilledin groups off central pads and can extend for miles in all directions. In each well pair, steam is injected into the upper well, the heat melts the bitumen, which allows it to flow into the lower well, where it is pumped to the surface.[70]

SAGD has proved to be a major breakthrough in production technology since it is cheaper than CSS, allows very high oil production rates, and recovers up to 60% of the oil in place. Because of itseconomic feasibilityand applicability to a vast area of oil sands, this method alone quadrupled North Americanoil reservesand allowed Canada to move to second place in world oil reserves after Saudi Arabia. Most major Canadian oil companies now have SAGD projects in production or under construction in Alberta's oil sands areas and in Wyoming. Examples includeJapan Canada Oil Sands Ltd's (JACOS)project, Suncor's Firebag project,Nexen's Long Lake project, Suncor's (formerly Petro-Canada's) MacKay River project,Husky Energy's Tucker Lake and Sunrise projects, Shell Canada's Peace River project,Cenovus Energy's Foster Creek[71]and Christina Lake[72]developments,ConocoPhillips' Surmont project,Devon Canada'sJackfish project, and Derek Oil & Gas's LAK Ranch project. Alberta's OSUM Corp has combined proven underground mining technology with SAGD to enable higher recovery rates by running wells underground from within the oil sands deposit, thus also reducing energy requirements compared to traditional SAGD. This particular technology application is in its testing phase.

Vapor Extraction (VAPEX)

[edit]

Several methods use solvents, instead of steam, to separate bitumen from sand. Some solvent extraction methods may work better inin situproduction and other in mining.[73]Solvent can be beneficial if it produces more oil while requiring less energy to produce steam.

Vapor Extraction Process (VAPEX) is anin situtechnology, similar to SAGD. Instead of steam, hydrocarbon solvents are injected into an upper well to dilute bitumen and enables the diluted bitumen to flow into a lower well. It has the advantage of much betterenergy efficiencyover steam injection, and it does some partial upgrading of bitumen to oil right in the formation. The process has attracted attention from oil companies, who are experimenting with it.

The above methods are not mutually exclusive. It is becoming common for wells to be put through one CSS injection-soak-production cycle to condition the formation prior to going to SAGD production, and companies are experimenting with combining VAPEX with SAGD to improve recovery rates and lower energy costs.[74]

Toe to Heel Air Injection (THAI)

[edit]

This is a very new and experimental method that combines a vertical air injection well with a horizontal production well. The process ignites oil in the reservoir and creates a vertical wall of fire moving from the "toe" of the horizontal well toward the "heel", which burns the heavier oil components and upgrades some of the heavy bitumen into lighter oil right in the formation. Historically fireflood projects have not worked out well because of difficulty in controlling the flame front and a propensity to set the producing wells on fire. However, some oil companies feel the THAI method will be more controllable and practical, and have the advantage of not requiring energy to create steam.[75]

Advocates of this method of extraction state that it uses less freshwater, produces 50% lessgreenhouse gases,and has a smaller footprint than other production techniques.[76]

Petrobank Energy and Resourceshas reported encouraging results from their test wells in Alberta, with production rates of up to 400 bbl/d (64 m3/d) per well, and the oil upgraded from 8 to 12API degrees. The company hopes to get a further 7-degree upgrade from its CAPRI (controlled atmospheric pressure resin infusion)[77]system, which pulls the oil through acatalystlining the lower pipe.[78][79][80]

After several years of production in situ, it has become clear that current THAI methods do not work as planned. Amid steady drops in production from their THAI wells at Kerrobert, Petrobank has written down the value of their THAI patents and the reserves at the facility to zero. They have plans to experiment with a new configuration they call "multi-THAI," involving adding more air injection wells.[81]

Combustion Overhead Gravity Drainage (COGD)

[edit]

This is an experimental method that employs a number of vertical air injection wells above a horizontal production well located at the base of the bitumen pay zone. An initial Steam Cycle similar to CSS is used to prepare the bitumen for ignition and mobility. Following that cycle, air is injected into the vertical wells, igniting the upper bitumen and mobilizing (through heating) the lower bitumen to flow into the production well. It is expected that COGD will result in water savings of 80% compared to SAGD.[82]

Froth treatment

[edit]
Bitumen froth treatmentis a process used in theAthabasca oil sands(AOS)bitumenrecovery operations to remove fine inorganics—water and mineral particles—frombitumenfroth, by diluting the bitumen with a light hydrocarbon solvent—either naphthenic or paraffinic—to reduce the viscosity of the froth and to remove contaminants that were not removed in previous water-based gravity recovery phases.[83]Bitumen with a high viscosity or with too many contaminants, is not suitable for transporting through pipelines or refining. The original and conventional naphthenic froth treatment (NFT) uses a naphtha solvent with the addition of chemicals. Paraffinic Solvent Froth Treatment (PSFT), which was first used commercially in theAlbian Sandsin the early 2000s, results in a cleaner bitumen with lower levels of contaminates, such as water and mineral solids.[84]Following froth treatments, bitumen can be further upgraded using "heat to produce synthetic crude oil by means of a coker unit."[84]

Energy balance

[edit]

Approximately 1.0–1.25 gigajoules (280–350 kWh) of energy is needed to extract a barrel of bitumen and upgrade it to synthetic crude. As of 2006, most of this is produced by burning natural gas.[85]Since abarrel of oil equivalentis about 6.117 gigajoules (1,699 kWh), itsEROEIis 5–6. That means this extracts about 5 or 6 times as much energy as is consumed. Energy efficiency is expected to improve to an average of 900 cubic feet (25 m3) of natural gas or 0.945 gigajoules (262 kWh) of energy per barrel by 2015, giving an EROEI of about 6.5.[86]

Alternatives to natural gas exist and are available in the oil sands area. Bitumen can itself be used as the fuel, consuming about 30–35% of the raw bitumen per produced unit of synthetic crude. Nexen's Long Lake project will use a proprietary deasphalting technology to upgrade the bitumen, using asphaltene residue fed to agasifierwhosesyngaswill be used by acogenerationturbine and a hydrogen producing unit, providing all the energy needs of the project: steam, hydrogen, and electricity.[87]Thus, it will produce syncrude without consuming natural gas, but the capital cost is very high.

Shortages of natural gas for project fuel were forecast to be a problem for Canadian oil sands production a few years ago, but recent increases in USshale gasproduction have eliminated much of the problem for North America. With the increasing use ofhydraulic fracturingmakingUS largely self-sufficient in natural gasand exporting more natural gas to Eastern Canada to replace Alberta gas, the Alberta government is using its powers under theNAFTAand theCanadian Constitutionto reduce shipments of natural gas to the US and Eastern Canada, and divert the gas to domestic Alberta use, particularly for oil sands fuel. The natural gas pipelines to the east and south are being converted to carry increasing oil sands production to these destinations instead of gas. Canada also hashuge undeveloped shale gas depositsin addition to those of the US, so natural gas for future oil sands production does not seem to be a serious problem. The low price of natural gas as the result of new production has considerably improved the economics of oil sands production.

Upgrading and blending

[edit]

The extra-heavy crude oil or crude bitumen extracted from oil sands is a very viscous semisolid form of oil that does not easily flow at normal temperatures, making it difficult to transport to market by pipeline. To flow through oil pipelines, it must either be upgraded to lighter synthetic crude oil (SCO), blended with diluents to form dilbit, or heated to reduce its viscosity.[88]

Canada

[edit]

In the Canadian oil sands, bitumen produced by surface mining is generally upgraded on-site and delivered as synthetic crude oil. This makes delivery of oil to market through conventional oil pipelines quite easy. On the other hand, bitumen produced by the in-situ projects is generally not upgraded but delivered to market in raw form. If the agent used to upgrade the bitumen to synthetic crude is not produced on site, it must be sourced elsewhere and transported to the site of upgrading. If the upgraded crude is being transported from the site by pipeline, and additional pipeline will be required to bring in sufficient upgrading agent. The costs of production of the upgrading agent, the pipeline to transport it and the cost to operate the pipeline must be calculated into the production cost of the synthetic crude.

Upon reaching arefinery,the synthetic crude is processed and a significant portion of the upgrading agent will be removed during the refining process. It may be used for other fuel fractions, but the end result is that liquid fuel has to be piped to the upgrading facility simply to make the bitumen transportable by pipeline. If all costs are considered, synthetic crude production and transfer using bitumen and an upgrading agent may prove economically unsustainable.

When the first oil sands plants were built over 50 years ago, most oil refineries in their market area were designed to handle light or medium crude oil with lower sulfur content than the 4–7% that is typically found in bitumen. The original oil sands upgraders were designed to produce a high-quality synthetic crude oil (SCO) with lower density and lower sulfur content. These are large, expensive plants which are much like heavy oil refineries. Research is currently being done on designing simpler upgraders which do not produce SCO but simply treat the bitumen to reduce its viscosity, allowing to be transported unblended like conventional heavy oil.

Western Canadian Select,launched in 2004 as a new heavy oil stream, blended at theHusky Energyterminal inHardisty,Alberta,[89] is the largest crude oil stream coming from the Canadian oil sands and thebenchmarkfor emerging heavy, high TAN (acidic) crudes.[90][91]: 9 [92][93] Western Canadian Select(WCS) is traded atCushing, Oklahoma,a major oil supply hub connecting oil suppliers to the Gulf Coast, which has become the most significant trading hub for crude oil in North America. While its major component is bitumen, it also contains a combination of sweet synthetic andcondensatediluents, and 25 existing streams of both conventional and unconventional oil[94]making it a syndilbit—both a dilbit and a synbit.[95]: 16 

The first step in upgrading isvacuum distillationto separate the lighter fractions. After that,de-asphaltingis used to separate the asphalt from the feedstock.Crackingis used to break the heavier hydrocarbon molecules down into simpler ones. Since cracking produces products which are rich in sulfur,desulfurizationmust be done to get the sulfur content below 0.5% and create sweet, light synthetic crude oil.[96]

In 2012, Alberta produced about 1,900,000 bbl/d (300,000 m3/d) of crude bitumen from its three major oil sands deposits, of which about 1,044,000 bbl/d (166,000 m3/d) was upgraded to lighter products and the rest sold as raw bitumen. The volume of both upgraded and non-upgraded bitumen is increasing yearly. Alberta has five oil sands upgraders producing a variety of products. These include:[97][98]

  • Suncor Energycan upgrade 440,000 bbl/d (70,000 m3/d) of bitumen to light sweet and medium sour synthetic crude oil (SCO), plus produce diesel fuel for its oil sands operations at the upgrader.
  • Syncrudecan upgrade 407,000 bbl/d (64,700 m3/d) of bitumen to sweet light SCO.
  • Canadian Natural ResourcesLimited (CNRL) can upgrade 141,000 bbl/d (22,400 m3/d) of bitumen to sweet light SCO.
  • Nexen,since 2013 wholly owned byChina National Offshore Oil Corporation(CNOOC), can upgrade 72,000 bbl/d (11,400 m3/d) of bitumen to sweet light SCO.
  • Shell Canadaoperates itsScotford Upgraderin combination with an oil refinery and chemical plant atScotford, Alberta,near Edmonton. The complex can upgrade 255,000 bbl/d (40,500 m3/d) of bitumen to sweet and heavy SCO as well as a range of refinery and chemical products.

Modernized and new large refineries such as are found in theMidwestern United Statesand on theGulf Coast of the United States,as well as many inChina,can handle upgrading heavy oil themselves, so their demand is for non-upgraded bitumen and extra-heavy oil rather than SCO. The main problem is that the feedstock would be too viscous to flow through pipelines, so unless it is delivered by tanker or rail car, it must be blended with diluent to enable it to flow. This requires mixing the crude bitumen with a lighter hydrocarbon diluent such as condensate from gas wells,pentanesand other light products from oil refineries or gas plants, or synthetic crude oil from oil sands upgraders to allow it to flow through pipelines to market.

Typically, blended bitumen contains about 30%natural gas condensateor other diluents and 70% bitumen. Alternatively, bitumen can also be delivered to market by specially designed railwaytank cars,tank trucks,liquid cargo barges,or ocean-goingoil tankers.These do not necessarily require the bitumen be blended with diluent since the tanks can be heated to allow the oil to be pumped out.

The demand for condensate for oil sands diluent is expected to be more than 750,000 bbl/d (119,000 m3/d) by 2020, double 2012 volumes. Since Western Canada only produces about 150,000 bbl/d (24,000 m3/d) of condensate, the supply was expected to become a major constraint on bitumen transport. However, the recent huge increase in UStight oilproduction has largely solved this problem, because much of the production is too light for US refinery use but ideal for diluting bitumen. The surplus American condensate and light oil is being exported to Canada and blended with bitumen, and then re-imported to the US as feedstock for refineries. Since the diluent is simply exported and then immediately re-imported, it is not subject to the US ban on exports of crude oil. Once it is back in the US, refineries separate the diluent and re-export it to Canada, which again bypasses US crude oil export laws since it is now a refinery product. To aid in this process,Kinder Morgan Energy Partnersis reversing its Cochin Pipeline, which used to carry propane from Edmonton to Chicago, to transport 95,000 bbl/d (15,100 m3/d) of condensate from Chicago to Edmonton by mid-2014; andEnbridgeis considering the expansion of its Southern Lights pipeline, which currently ships 180,000 bbl/d (29,000 m3/d) of diluent from the Chicago area to Edmonton, by adding another 100,000 bbl/d (16,000 m3/d).[99]

Venezuela

[edit]

Although Venezuelan extra-heavy oil is less viscous than Canadian bitumen, much of the difference is due to temperature. Once the oil comes out of the ground and cools, it has the same difficulty in that it is too viscous to flow through pipelines. Venezuela is now producing more extra heavy crude in the Orinoco oil sands than its four upgraders, which were built by foreign oil companies over a decade ago, can handle. The upgraders have a combined capacity of 630,000 bbl/d (100,000 m3/d), which is only half of its production of extra-heavy oil. In addition Venezuela produces insufficient volumes ofnaphthato use as diluent to move extra-heavy oil to market. Unlike Canada, Venezuela does not produce muchnatural gas condensatefrom its own gas wells, nor does it have easy access to condensate from new USshale gasproduction. Since Venezuela also has insufficient refinery capacity to supply its domestic market, supplies of naptha are insufficient to use as pipeline diluent, and it is having to import naptha to fill the gap. Since Venezuela also has financial problems—as a result of the country'seconomic crisis—and political disagreements with the US government and oil companies, the situation remains unresolved.[100]

Refining

[edit]

Heavycrude feedstockneeds pre-processing before it is fit for conventional refineries, although heavy oil and bitumen refineries can do the pre-processing themselves. This pre-processing is called "upgrading", the key components of which are as follows:

  1. removal of water, sand, physical waste, and lighter products
  2. catalytic purification byhydrodemetallisation(HDM),hydrodesulfurization(HDS) andhydrodenitrogenation(HDN)
  3. hydrogenation through carbon rejection orcatalytic hydrocracking(HCR)

As carbon rejection is very inefficient and wasteful in most cases,catalytic hydrocrackingis preferred in most cases. All these processes take large amounts of energy and water, while emitting more carbon dioxide than conventional oil.

Catalytic purification and hydrocracking are together known ashydroprocessing.The big challenge in hydroprocessing is to deal with the impurities found in heavy crude, as they poison the catalysts over time. Many efforts have been made to deal with this to ensure high activity and long life of a catalyst. Catalyst materials and pore size distributions are key parameters that need to be optimized to deal with this challenge and varies from place to place, depending on the kind of feedstock present.[101]

Canada

[edit]

There are four majoroil refineriesin Alberta which supply most ofWestern Canadawithpetroleum products,but as of 2012 these processed less than 1/4 of the approximately 1,900,000 bbl/d (300,000 m3/d) of bitumen and SCO produced in Alberta. Some of the large oil sands upgraders also produced diesel fuel as part of their operations. Some of the oil sands bitumen and SCO went to refineries in other provinces, but most of it was exported to the United States. The four major Alberta refineries are:[102]

  • Suncor Energyoperates thePetro-Canadarefinery near Edmonton, which can process 142,000 bbl/d (22,600 m3/d) of all types of oil and bitumen into all types of products.
  • Imperial Oiloperates theStrathcona Refinerynear Edmonton, which can process 187,200 bbl/d (29,760 m3/d) of SCO and conventional oil into all types of products.
  • Shell Canadaoperates the Scotford Refinery near Edmonton, which is integrated with theScotford Upgrader,and which can process 100,000 bbl/d (16,000 m3/d) of all types of oil and bitumen into all types of products.
  • Husky Energy,operates theHusky Lloydminster RefineryinLloydminster,which can process 28,300 bbl/d (4,500 m3/d) of feedstock from the adjacent Husky Upgrader intobitumenand other products.

The $8.5 billionSturgeon Refinery,a fifth major Alberta refinery, is under construction nearFort Saskatchewanwith a completion date of 2017.[103][104]

The Pacific Future Energy project proposed a new refinery in British Columbia that would process bitumen into fuel for Asian and Canadian markets. Pacific Future Energy proposes to transport near-solid bitumen to the refinery using railway tank cars.[105]

Most of the Canadian oil refining industry is foreign-owned. Canadian refineries can process only about 25% of the oil produced in Canada. Canadian refineries, outside of Alberta and Saskatchewan, were originally built for light and medium crude oil. With new oil sands production coming on production at lower prices than international oil, market price imbalances have ruined the economics of refineries which could not process it.

United States

[edit]

Prior to 2013, when China surpassed it, the United States was the largest oil importer in the world.[106]Unlike Canada, the US has hundreds of oil refineries, many of which have been modified to process heavy oil as US production of light and medium oil declined. The main market for Canadian bitumen as well as Venezuelan extra-heavy oil was assumed to be the US. The United States has historically been Canada's largest customer for crude oil and products, particularly in recent years. American imports of oil and products from Canada grew from 450,000 bbl/d (72,000 m3/d) in 1981 to 3,120,000 bbl/d (496,000 m3/d) in 2013 as Canada's oil sands produced more and more oil, while in the US, domestic production and imports from other countries declined.[107]However, this relationship is becoming strained due to physical, economic and political influences. Export pipeline capacity is approaching its limits; Canadian oil is selling at a discount to world market prices; US demand for crude oil and product imports has declined because of US economic problems; and US oil domestic unconventional oil production (shale oil production fromfrackingis growing rapidly. The US resumed export of crude oil in 2016; as of early 2019, the US produced as much oil as it consumed, with shale oil displacing Canadian imports.

For the benefit of oil marketers, in 2004 Western Canadian producers created a newbenchmark crude oilcalledWestern Canadian Select,(WCS), a bitumen-derived heavy crude oil blend that is similar in its transportation and refining characteristics to California, Mexico Maya, or Venezuela heavy crude oils. This heavy oil has an API gravity of 19–21 and despite containing large amounts of bitumen and synthetic crude oil, flows through pipelines well and is classified as "conventional heavy oil" by governments. There are several hundred thousand barrels per day of this blend being imported into the US, in addition to larger amounts of crude bitumen and synthetic crude oil (SCO) from the oil sands.

The demand from US refineries is increasingly for non-upgraded bitumen rather than SCO. The CanadianNational Energy Board(NEB) expects SCO volumes to double to around 1,900,000 bbl/d (300,000 m3/d) by 2035, but not keep pace with the total increase in bitumen production. It projects that the portion of oil sands production that is upgraded to SCO to decline from 49% in 2010 to 37% in 2035. This implies that over 3,200,000 bbl/d (510,000 m3/d) of bitumen will have to be blended with diluent for delivery to market.

Asia

[edit]

Demand for oil in Asia has been growing much faster than in North America or Europe. In 2013, China replaced the United States as the world's largest importer of crude oil, and its demand continues to grow much faster than its production. The main impediment to Canadian exports to Asia is pipeline capacity – The only pipeline capable of delivering oil sands production to Canada's Pacific Coast is the Trans Mountain Pipeline from Edmonton to Vancouver, which is now operating at its capacity of 300,000 bbl/d (48,000 m3/d) supplying refineries in B.C. and Washington State. However, once complete, the Northern Gateway pipeline and the Trans Mountain expansion currently undergoing government review are expected to deliver an additional 500,000 bbl/d (79,000 m3/d) to 1,100,000 bbl/d (170,000 m3/d) to tankers on the Pacific coast, from where they could deliver it anywhere in the world. There is sufficient heavy oil refinery capacity in China and India to refine the additional Canadian volume, possibly with some modifications to the refineries.[108]In recent years, Chinese oil companies such asChina Petrochemical Corporation(Sinopec),China National Offshore Oil Corporation(CNOOC), andPetroChinahave bought over $30 billion in assets in Canadian oil sands projects, so they would probably like to export some of their newly acquired oil to China.[109]

Economics

[edit]

The world's largest deposits ofbitumenare in Canada, although Venezuela's deposits of extra-heavy crude oilare even bigger. Canada has vast energy resources of all types and its oil and natural gas resource base would be large enough to meet Canadian needs for generations if demand was sustained. Abundanthydroelectricresources account for the majority of Canada's electricity production and very little electricity is produced from oil.

TheNational Energy Board(NEB) reported in 2013, that if oil prices are above $100, Canada would have more than enough energy to meet its growing needs. The excess oil production from the oil sands could be exported. The major importing country would probably continue to be the United States, although before the developments in 2014, there was increasing demand for oil, particularly heavy oil, from Asian countries such as China and India.[110]

Canada has abundant resources of bitumen and crude oil, with an estimated remaining ultimate resource potential of 54 billion cubic metres (340 billion barrels). Of this, oil sands bitumen accounts for 90 per cent. Alberta currently accounts for all of Canada's bitumen resources. "Resources" become "reserves" only after it is proven that economic recovery can be achieved. At 2013 prices using current technology, Canada had remaining oil reserves of 27 billion m3(170 billion bbls), with 98% of this attributed to oil sands bitumen. This put its reserves in third place in the world behindVenezuelaandSaudi Arabia.At the much lower prices of 2015, the reserves are much smaller.[citation needed]

Costs

[edit]

The costs of production and transportation of saleable petroleum from oil sands is typically significantly higher than from conventional global sources.[111][112]Hence the economic viability of oil sands production is more vulnerable to theprice of oil.The price ofbenchmarkWest Texas Intermediate(WTI) oil atCushing, Oklahomaabove US$100/bbl that prevailed until late 2014 was sufficient to promote active growth in oil sands production. Major Canadian oil companies had announced expansion plans and foreign companies were investing significant amounts of capital, in many cases forming partnerships with Canadian companies. Investment had been shifting towardsin-situsteam-assisted gravity drainage(SAGD) projects and away from mining and upgrading projects, as oil sands operators foresee better opportunities from selling bitumen and heavy oil directly to refineries than from upgrading it tosynthetic crude oil.Cost estimatesfor Canada include the effects of the mining when the mines are returned to the environment in "as good as or better than original condition". Cleanup of the end products of consumption are the responsibility of the consuming jurisdictions, which are mostly in provinces or countries other than the producing one.

The Alberta government estimated that in 2012, the supply cost of oil sands new mining operations was $70 to $85 per barrel, whereas the cost of new SAGD projects was $50 to $80 per barrel.[97]These costs included capital and operating costs, royalties and taxes, plus a reasonable profit to the investors. Since the price of WTI rose to $100/bbl beginning in 2011,[113]production from oil sands was then expected to be highly profitable assuming the product could be delivered to markets. The main market was the huge refinery complexes on the US Gulf Coast, which are generally capable of processing Canadian bitumen and Venezuelan extra-heavy oil without upgrading.

TheCanadian Energy Research Institute(CERI) performed an analysis, estimating that in 2012 the average plant gate costs (including 10% profit margin, but excluding blending and transport) of primary recovery was $30.32/bbl, of SAGD was $47.57/bbl, of mining and upgrading was $99.02/bbl, and of mining without upgrading was $68.30/bbl.[114]Thus, all types of oil sands projects except new mining projects with integrated upgraders were expected to be consistently profitable from 2011 onward, provided that global oil prices remained favourable. Since the larger and more sophisticated refineries preferred to buy raw bitumen and heavy oil rather than synthetic crude oil, new oil sands projects avoided the costs of building new upgraders. Although primary recovery such as is done in Venezuela is cheaper than SAGD, it only recovers about 10% of the oil in place versus 60% or more for SAGD and over 99% for mining. Canadian oil companies were in a more competitive market and had access to more capital than in Venezuela, and preferred to spend that extra money on SAGD or mining to recover more oil.

Then in late 2014 the dramatic rise in U.S. production from shale formations, combined with a global economic malaise that reduced demand, caused the price of WTI to drop below $50, where it remained as of late 2015.[115] In 2015, the Canadian Energy Research Institute (CERI) re-estimated the average plant gate costs (again including 10% profit margin) of SAGD to be $58.65/bbl, and 70.18/bbl for mining without upgrading. Including costs of blending and transportation, the WTI equivalent supply costs for delivery to Cushing become US$80.06/bbl for SAGD projects, and $89.71/bbl for a standalone mine.[111] In this economic environment, plans for further development of production from oil sands have been slowed or deferred,[116] [117]or even abandoned during construction.[118] Production of synthetic crude from mining operations may continue at a loss because of the costs of shutdown and restart, as well as commitments to supply contracts.[119]During the2020 Russia–Saudi Arabia oil price war,the price of Canadian heavy crude dipped below $5 per barrel.[120]

Production forecasts

[edit]

Oil sands production forecasts released by theCanadian Association of Petroleum Producers(CAPP), theAlberta Energy Regulator(AER), and the Canadian Energy Research Institute (CERI) are comparable toNational Energy Board(NEB) projections, in terms of total bitumen production. None of these forecasts take into account probable international constraints to be imposed on combustion of all hydrocarbons in order to limit global temperature rise, giving rise to a situation denoted by the term "carbon bubble".[121]Ignoring such constraints, and also assuming that the price of oil recovers from its collapse in late 2014, the list of currently proposed projects, many of which are in the early planning stages, would suggest that by 2035 Canadian bitumen production could potentially reach as much as 1.3 million m3/d (8.3 million barrels per day) if most were to go ahead. Under the same assumptions, a more likely scenario is that by 2035, Canadian oil sands bitumen production would reach 800,000 m3/d (5.0 million barrels/day), 2.6 times the production for 2012. The majority of the growth would likely occur in the in-situ category, as in-situ projects usually have better economics than mining projects. Also, 80% of Canada's oil sands reserves are well-suited to in-situ extraction, versus 20% for mining methods.

An additional assumption is that there would be sufficient pipeline infrastructure to deliver increased Canadian oil production to export markets. If this were a limiting factor, there could be impacts on Canadian crude oil prices, constraining future production growth. Another assumption is that US markets will continue to absorb increased Canadian exports. Rapid growth oftight oilproduction in the US, Canada's primary oil export market, has greatly reduced US reliance onimported crude.The potential for Canadian oil exports to alternative markets such as Asia is also uncertain. There are increasing political obstacles to building any new pipelines to deliver oil in Canada and the US. In November 2015, U.S. PresidentBarack Obamarejected the proposal to build theKeystone XL pipelinefrom Alberta to Steele City, Nebraska.[122] In the absence of new pipeline capacity, companies are increasingly shipping bitumen to US markets by railway, river barge, tanker, and other transportation methods. Other than ocean tankers, these alternatives are all more expensive than pipelines.[112]

A shortage of skilled workers in the Canadian oil sands developed during periods of rapid development of new projects. In the absence of other constraints on further development, the oil and gas industry would need to fill tens of thousands of job openings in the next few years as a result of industry activity levels as well as age-related attrition. In the longer term, under a scenario of higher oil and gas prices, the labor shortages would continue to get worse. A potential labor shortage can increase construction costs and slow the pace of oil sands development.[110]

The skilled worker shortage was much more severe in Venezuela because the government controlled oil companyPDVSAfired most of its heavy oil experts after theVenezuelan general strike of 2002–03,and wound down the production ofOrimulsion,which was the primary product from its oil sands. Following that, the governmentre-nationalized the Venezuelan oil industryand increased taxes on it. The result was that foreign companies left Venezuela, as did most of its elite heavy oil technical experts. In recent years, Venezuela's heavy oil production has been falling, and it has consistently been failing to meet its production targets.

As of late 2015, development of new oil sand projects were deterred by the price of WTI below US$50, which is barely enough to support production from existing operations.[116]Demand recovery was suppressed by economic problems that may continue indefinitely to bedevil both theEuropean Communityand China. Low-cost production byOPECcontinued at maximum capacity, efficiency of production from U.S. shales continued to improve, and Russian exports were mandated even below cost of production, as their only source of hard currency.[123]There is also the possibility that there will emerge an international agreement to introduce measures to constrain the combustion of hydrocarbons in an effort to limit global temperature rise to the nominal 2 °C that is consensually predicted to limit environmental harm to tolerable levels.[124]Rapid technological progress is being made to reduce the cost of competing renewable sources of energy.[125]Hence there is no consensus about when, if ever, oil prices paid to producers may substantially recover.[123][125][126]

A detailed academic study of the consequences for the producers of the various hydrocarbon fuels concluded in early 2015 that a third of global oil reserves, half of gas reserves and over 80% of current coal reserves should remain underground from 2010 to 2050 in order to meet the target of 2 °C. Hence continued exploration or development of reserves would be extraneous to needs. To meet the 2 °C target, strong measures would be needed to suppress demand, such as a substantial carbon tax leaving a lower price for the producers from a smaller market. The impact on producers in Canada would be far larger than in the U.S. Open-pit mining of natural bitumen in Canada would soon drop to negligible levels after 2020 in all scenarios considered because it is considerably less economic than other methods of production.[127][128][129]

Environmental issues

[edit]
Satellite images show the growth of pit mines over Canada's oil sands between 1984 and 2011.
Demonstration of citizens against tar sands and theKeystone Pipeline.

In their 2011 commissioned report entitled "Prudent Development: Realizing the Potential of North America's Abundant Natural Gas and Oil Resources," theNational Petroleum Council,an advisory committee to the U.S. Secretary of Energy, acknowledged health and safety concerns regarding the oil sands which include "volumes of water needed to generate issues of water sourcing; removal of overburden for surface mining can fragment wildlife habitat and increase the risk of soil erosion or surface run-off events to nearby water systems; GHG and other air emissions from production."[130]

Oil sands extraction can affect the land when the bitumen is initially mined, water resources by its requirement for large quantities of water during separation of the oil and sand, and the air due to the release of carbon dioxide and other emissions.[131]Heavy metals such asvanadium,nickel,lead,cobalt,mercury,chromium,cadmium,arsenic,selenium,copper,manganese,ironandzincare naturally present in oil sands and may be concentrated by the extraction process.[132]The environmental impact caused by oil sand extraction is frequently criticized by environmental groups such asGreenpeace,Climate Reality Project,Pembina Institute,350.org,MoveOn.org,League of Conservation Voters,Patagonia,Sierra Club,andEnergy Action Coalition.[133][134]In particular, mercury contamination has been found around oil sands production in Alberta, Canada.[135]The European Union has indicated that it may vote to label oil sands oil as "highly polluting". Although oil sands exports to Europe are minimal, the issue has caused friction between the EU and Canada.[136]According to the California-basedJacobs Consultancy,the European Union used inaccurate and incomplete data in assigning a high greenhouse gas rating to gasoline derived from Alberta's oilsands. Also, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Nigeria and Russia do not provide data on how much natural gas is released viaflaringorventingin the oil extraction process. The Jacobs report pointed out that extra carbon emissions from oil-sand crude are 12 percent higher than from regular crude, although it was assigned a GHG rating 22% above the conventional benchmark by EU.[137][138]

In 2014 results of a study published in theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciencesshowed that official reports on emissions were not high enough. Report authors noted that, "emissions of organic substances with potential toxicity to humans and the environment are a major concern surrounding the rapid industrial development in the Athabasca oil sands region (AOSR)." This study found that tailings ponds were an indirect pathway transporting uncontrolled releases of evaporative emissions of three representativepolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon(PAH)s (phenanthrene,pyrene,andbenzo(a)pyrene) and that these emissions had been previously unreported.[139][140]

Air pollution management

[edit]

The Alberta government computes anAir Quality Health Index(AQHI) from sensors in five communities in the oil sands region, operated by a "partner" called theWood BuffaloEnvironmental Association (WBEA). Each of their 17 continuously monitoring stations measure 3 to 10 air quality parameters amongcarbon monoxide(CO),hydrogen sulfide(H
2
S
), total reducedsulfur(TRS),Ammonia(NH
3
),nitric oxide(NO),nitrogen dioxide(NO
2
),nitrogen oxides(NOx),ozone(O
3
),particulate matter(PM2.5),sulfur dioxide(SO
2
), totalhydrocarbons(THC), andmethane/non-methane hydrocarbons (CH
4
/NMHC).[141]These AQHI are said to indicate "low risk" air quality more than 95% of the time.[142]Prior to 2012, air monitoring showed significant increases in exceedances of hydrogen sulfide (H
2
S
) both in the Fort McMurray area and near the oil sands upgraders.[143]In 2007, the Alberta government issued an environmental protection order to Suncor in response to numerous occasions when ground level concentration forH
2
S
) exceeded standards.[144]The Alberta Ambient Air Data Management System (AAADMS) of the Clean Air Strategic Alliance[145](aka CASA Data Warehouse) records that, during the year ending on 1 November 2015, there were 6 hourly reports of values exceeding the limit of 10ppbforH
2
S
,and 4 in 2013, down from 11 in 2014, and 73 in 2012.[146]

In September 2015, thePembina Institutepublished a brief report about "a recent surge of odour and air quality concerns in northern Alberta associated with the expansion of oilsands development", contrasting the responses to these concerns inPeace RiverandFort McKay.In Fort McKay, air quality is actively addressed by stakeholders represented in the WBEA, whereas the Peace River community must rely on the response of theAlberta Energy Regulator.In an effort to identify the sources of the noxious odours in the Fort McKay community, a Fort McKay Air Quality Index was established, extending the provincial Air Quality Health Index to include possible contributors to the problem:SO
2
,TRS, and THC. Despite these advantages, more progress was made in remediating the odour problems in the Peace River community, although only after some families had already abandoned their homes. The odour concerns in Fort McKay were reported to remain unresolved.[147]

Land use and waste management

[edit]

A large part of oil sands mining operations involves clearing trees and brush from a site and removing theoverburden—topsoil, muskeg, sand, clay and gravel—that sits atop the oil sands deposit.[148]Approximately 2.5 tons of oil sands are needed to produce one barrel of oil (roughly18of a ton).[149] As a condition of licensing, projects are required to implement areclamationplan.[150]The mining industry asserts that theboreal forestwill eventually colonize the reclaimed lands, but their operations are massive and work on long-term timeframes. As of 2013, about 715 square kilometres (276 sq mi) of land in the oil sands region have been disturbed, and 72 km2(28 sq mi) of that land is under reclamation.[151]In March 2008, Alberta issued the first-ever oil sands land reclamation certificate to Syncrude for the 1.04 square kilometres (0.40 sq mi) parcel of land known as Gateway Hill approximately 35 kilometres (22 mi) north of Fort McMurray.[152]Several reclamation certificate applications for oil sands projects are expected within the next 10 years.[153]

Water management

[edit]

Between 2 and 4.5 volume units of water are used to produce each volume unit of synthetic crude oil in anex-situmining operation. According to Greenpeace, the Canadian oil sands operations use 349×10^6m3/a (12.3×10^9cu ft/a) of water, twice the amount of water used by the city ofCalgary.[154]However, in SAGD operations, 90–95% of the water is recycled and only about 0.2 volume units of water is used per volume unit of bitumen produced.[155]

For the Athabasca oil sand operations water is supplied from the Athabasca River, the ninth longest river in Canada.[156]The average flow just downstream of Fort McMurray is 633 m3/s (22,400 cu ft/s) with its highest daily average measuring 1,200 m3/s (42,000 cu ft/s).[157][158]Oil sands industries water license allocations totals about 1.8% of the Athabasca river flow. Actual use in 2006 was about 0.4%.[159]In addition, according to the Water Management Framework for the Lower Athabasca River, during periods of low river flow water consumption from the Athabasca River is limited to 1.3% of annual average flow.[160]

In December 2010, the Oil Sands Advisory Panel, commissioned by former environment minister Jim Prentice, found that the system in place for monitoring water quality in the region, including work by the Regional Aquatic Monitoring Program, the Alberta Water Research Institute, the Cumulative Environmental Management Association and others, was piecemeal and should become more comprehensive and coordinated.[161][162]

Greenhouse gas emissions

[edit]

The production of bitumen and synthetic crude oil emits more greenhouse gases than the production of conventional crude oil. A 2009 study by the consulting firmIHS CERAestimated that production from Canada's oil sands emits "about 5% to 15% more carbon dioxide, over the" well-to-wheels "(WTW) lifetime analysis of the fuel, than average crude oil."[163]Author and investigative journalist David Strahan that same year stated that IEA figures show that carbon dioxide emissions from the oil sands are 20% higher than average emissions from the petroleum production.[164]

AStanford Universitystudy commissioned by the EU in 2011 found that oil sands crude was as much as 22% morecarbon-intensivethan other fuels.[165][166]According to the "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace" analysis, oil sands emit 31% more GHG that the average North American crude oil.[167]In 2023 a federal study found that the real emissions from oil sands are 65% higher than reported by the industry.[168]

Greenpeace says the oil sands industry has been identified as the largest contributor togreenhouse gas emissionsgrowth in Canada, as it accounts for 40 million tons ofCO
2
emissions per year.[169]

According to theCanadian Association of Petroleum ProducersandEnvironment Canadathe industrial activity undertaken to produce oil sands make up about 5% of Canada's greenhouse gas emissions, or 0.1% of global greenhouse gas emissions. It predicts the oil sands will grow to make up 8% of Canada's greenhouse gas emissions by 2015.[170]While the production industrial activity emissions per barrel of bitumen produced decreased 26% over the decade 1992–2002, total emissions from production activity were expected to increase due to higher production levels.[171][172]As of 2006, to produce one barrel of oil from the oil sands released almost 75 kilograms (165 lb) of greenhouse gases with total emissions estimated to be 67megatonnes(66,000,000long tons;74,000,000short tons) per year by 2015.[173]A study by IHS CERA found that fuels made from Canadian oil sands resulted in significantly lower greenhouse gas emissions than many commonly cited estimates.[174]A 2012 study by Swart and Weaver estimated that if only the economically viable reserve of 170 Gbbl (27×10^9m3) oil sands was burnt, the global mean temperature would increase by 0.02 to 0.05 °C. If the entire oil-in-place of 1.8 trillion barrels were to be burnt, the predicted global mean temperature increase is 0.24 to 0.50 °C.[175]Bergerson et al. found that while the WTW emissions can be higher than crude oil,the lower emitting oil sands cases can outperform higher emitting conventional crude cases.[176]

To offset greenhouse gas emissions from the oil sands and elsewhere in Alberta, sequestering carbon dioxide emissions inside depleted oil and gas reservoirs has been proposed. This technology is inherited fromenhanced oil recoverymethods.[177]In July 2008, the Alberta government announced a C$2 billion fund to support sequestration projects in Alberta power plants and oil sands extraction and upgrading facilities.[178][179][180]

In November 2014,Fatih Birol,thechief economistof theInternational Energy Agency,described additional greenhouse gas emissions from Canada's oil sands as "extremely low". The IEA forecasts that in the next 25 years oil sands production in Canada will increase by more than 3 million barrels per day (480,000 m3/d), but Dr. Birol said "the emissions of this additional production is equal to only 23 hours ofemissions of China— not even one day. "The IEA is charged with responsibility for battling climate change, but Dr. Birol said he spends little time worrying about carbon emissions from oil sands." There is a lot of discussion on oil sands projects in Canada and the United States and other parts of the world, but to be frank, the additional CO2 emissions coming from the oil sands is extremely low. "Dr. Birol acknowledged that there is tremendous difference of opinion on the course of action regarding climate change, but added," I hope all these reactions are based on scientific facts and sound analysis. "[181][182]

In 2014, theU.S. Congressional Research Servicepublished a report in preparation for the decision about permitting construction of theKeystone XL pipeline.The report states in part: "Canadian oil sands crudes are generally more GHG emission-intensive than other crudes they may displace in U.S. refineries, and emit an estimated 17% more GHGs on a life-cycle basis than the average barrel of crude oil refined in the United States".[183]

According toNatural Resources Canada(NRCan), by 2017, the 23 percent increase in GHG emissions in Canada from 2005 to 2017, was "largely from increased oil sands production, particularly in-situ extraction".[8]

Aquatic life deformities

[edit]

There is conflicting research on the effects of the oil sands development on aquatic life. In 2007, Environment Canada completed a study that shows high deformity rates in fish embryos exposed to the oil sands.David W. Schindler,a limnologist from theUniversity of Alberta,co-authored a study on Alberta's oil sands' contribution ofaromatic polycyclic compounds,some of which are knowncarcinogens,to the Athabasca River and its tributaries.[184]Scientists, local doctors, and residents supported a letter sent to the Prime Minister in September 2010 calling for an independent study of Lake Athabasca (which is downstream of the oil sands) to be initiated due to the rise of deformities and tumors found in fish caught there.[185]

The bulk of the research that defends the oil sands development is done by the Regional Aquatics Monitoring Program (RAMP), whose steering committee is composed largely of oil and gas companies. RAMP studies show that deformity rates are normal compared to historical data and the deformity rates in rivers upstream of the oil sands.[186][187][188]

Public health impacts

[edit]

In 2007, it was suggested that wildlife has been negatively affected by the oil sands; for instance, moose were found in a 2006 study to have as high as 453 times the acceptable levels ofarsenicin their systems, though later studies lowered this to 17 to 33 times the acceptable level (although below international thresholds for consumption).[189]

Concerns have been raised concerning the negative impacts that the oil sands have on public health, including higher than normal rates ofcanceramong residents ofFort Chipewyan.[190]However, John O'Connor, the doctor who initially reported the higher cancer rates and linked them to the oil sands development, was subsequently investigated by theAlberta College of Physicians and Surgeons.The College later reported that O'Connor's statements consisted of "mistruths, inaccuracies and unconfirmed information".[191]

In 2010, theRoyal Society of Canadareleased a report stating that "there is currently no credible evidence of environmental contaminant exposures from oil sands reaching Fort Chipewyan at levels expected to cause elevated human cancer rates."[191]

In August 2011, the Alberta government initiated a provincial health study to examine whether a link exists between the higher rates of cancer and the oil sands emissions.[192]

In a report released in 2014, Alberta's Chief Medical Officer of Health, Dr. James Talbot, stated that "There isn't strong evidence for an association between any of these cancers and environmental exposure [to oil sands]." Rather, Talbot suggested that the cancer rates atFort Chipewyan,which were slightly higher compared with the provincial average, were likely due to a combination of factors such as high rates of smoking, obesity, diabetes, and alcoholism as well as poor levels of vaccination.[191]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^The "Middle East onshore market" was the "cheapest source of new oil volumes globally" with the "North American tight oil" —which includes onshoreshale oilin the United States—in second place.The breakeven price for North American shale oil was US$68 a barrel in 2015, making it one of the most expensive to produce. By 2019, the "average Brent breakeven price for tight oil was about US$46 per barrel. The breakeven price of oil from Saudi Arabia and other Middle Eastern countries was US$42, in comparison.

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcdPierre-René Bauquis (16 February 2006)."What the future for extra heavy oil and bitumen: the Orinoco case".World Energy Council. Archived fromthe originalon 2 April 2007.Retrieved10 July2007.
  2. ^abcAlberta's Oil Sands: Opportunity, Balance.Government of Alberta. March 2008.ISBN978-0-7785-7348-7.Retrieved13 May2008.
  3. ^"About Tar Sands".Archived fromthe originalon 4 September 2014.Retrieved14 May2008.
  4. ^"Bitumen and heavy crudes: The energy security problem solved?".Oil and Energy Trends.31(6): 3–5. 2006.doi:10.1111/j.1744-7992.2006.310603.x.
  5. ^"What Are The Oil Sands?".Canada's Oil Sands.Calgary, AB: Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers.Retrieved28 February2016.Oil sands are a mixture of sand, water, clay and bitumen. Bitumen is oil that is too heavy or thick to flow or be pumped without being diluted or heated. *** Bitumen is so viscous that at room temperature it acts much like cold molasses.
  6. ^abcdefgDusseault, M. B. (12–14 June 2001)."Comparing Venezuelan and Canadian Heavy Oil and Tar Sands"(PDF).Canadian International Petroleum Conference.Proceedings of Petroleum Society's Canadian International Conference.Vol. 61.doi:10.2118/2001-061.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 24 October 2011.Retrieved4 June2014.
  7. ^"The Real GHG trend".Pembina. 4 October 2017.
  8. ^ab"Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG)s".Natural Resources Canada(NRCan).6 October 2017.Retrieved28 January2020.
  9. ^Bilkadi, Zayn (November–December 1984)."Bitumen – A History".Saudi Aramco World.pp. 2–9.Retrieved1 January2011.
  10. ^Hirst, K. Kris (2009)."Bitumen – A Smelly but Useful Material of Interest".Archaeology.About.com.Retrieved23 October2009.
  11. ^"Pechelbronn petroleum museum"(in French). Archived fromthe originalon 12 March 2012.Retrieved30 December2007.
  12. ^"The oil wells of Alsace"(PDF).The New York Times.23 February 1880.Retrieved11 February2012.
  13. ^Mackenzie, Sir Alexander (1970). Lamb, W. Kaye (ed.).The Journals and Letters of Alexander Mackenzie.Cambridge: Hakluyt Society. p. 129.ISBN978-0-521-01034-4.
  14. ^ab"Rystad Energy ranks the cheapest sources of supply in the oil industry"(Press release). 9 May 2019.Retrieved29 January2020.
  15. ^"Canada is betting on climate failure".The National Observer.22 May 2019.Retrieved29 January2020.
  16. ^Mouawad, Jad (3 March 2008),"Oil Prices Pass Record Set in 1980s, but Then Recede",New York Times,retrieved17 February2016
  17. ^"Oil futures bounce on OPEC deal speculation".CNCB via Reuters. 16 February 2016.Retrieved17 February2016.
  18. ^Marsh, James H. (1999).The Canadian Encyclopedia.The Canadian Encyclopedia.ISBN9780771020995.
  19. ^"Coal Tar".City of Kingston, Ontario. 2007.Retrieved13 May2008.
  20. ^ab"Alberta's oil sands".Government of Alberta. 2007. Archived fromthe originalon 10 April 2008.
  21. ^Dembicki, Geoff (25 April 2011)."Tar Sands vs Oil Sands Political Flap Misguided?".Retrieved22 April2013.
  22. ^Evans, John (November 2006)."Sand banks: If unconventional sources of oil, such as oil sands, could be transformed into crude we could still have a 300-year supply left. The problem is extracting it".Chemistry and Industry:18–36. Archived fromthe originalon 18 May 2013.Retrieved7 October2009.
  23. ^"Initial Oil-in-Place - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics".
  24. ^"OPEC: Annual Statistical Bulletin".
  25. ^abDusseault, Maurice (March 2002)."14.1 Appendix 1: Canada's Oil Sands and Heavy Oil deposits"(PDF).Cold Heavy Oil Production with Sand in the Canadian Heavy Oil Industry(Report). Alberta Department of Energy.Retrieved22 April2014.
  26. ^abcHein, Fran."Geology of the Oil Sands"(PDF).Association of Petroleum Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 7 May 2013.Retrieved4 June2014.
  27. ^Turgeon, Andrew; Morse, Elizabeth (19 October 2023)."Petroleum".National Geographic.Education. National Geographic Society.Retrieved6 February2024.
  28. ^abcdefBakx, Kyle (12 October 2023)."Canada could lead the world in oil production growth in 2024".CBC News.Retrieved6 February2024.
  29. ^"Trans Mountain mulling how to remove 'obstruction' causing newest construction delay".Canadian Press.1 February 2024.Retrieved6 February2024– via CBC News.
  30. ^"Ecocide must be listed alongside genocide as an international crime".The Guardian.22 June 2021.ISSN0261-3077.Retrieved21 June2023.
  31. ^"Tar sands: tearing the flesh from the Earth".theecologist.org.18 August 2009.Retrieved21 June2023.
  32. ^"Indigenous groups say Big Oil's pollution threatens their existence in Canadian forest".NBC News.22 November 2021.Retrieved21 June2023.
  33. ^"Trudeau Is Betting $9 Billion on a Plan to Clean Up the World's Dirtiest Oil".Bloomberg.com.5 June 2023.Retrieved21 June2023.
  34. ^Weisbrod, Katelyn (21 November 2021)."Canada's Tar Sands: Destruction So Vast and Deep It Challenges the Existence of Land and People".Inside Climate News.Retrieved21 June2023.
  35. ^"The terrible toll of tar sands mining on Canada's Native people".Mother Jones.Retrieved21 June2023.
  36. ^"Alberta's Oil Sands 2006"(PDF).Government of Alberta. 2007. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 27 February 2008.Retrieved17 February2008.
  37. ^O.P. Strausz."The Chemistry of the Alberta Oil Sand Bitumen"(PDF).University of Alberta.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 1 June 2010.Retrieved18 April2014.
  38. ^abcAlberta Oil Sands Quarterly Update(PDF)(Report). Government of Alberta. Winter 2013.
  39. ^"Premium Petroleum Corp. Increases Lands Position to 11,520 Acres".Premium Petroleum Corp.19 September 2007.Retrieved22 June2010.
  40. ^"Survey of Energy Resources 2007: Natural Bitument - Resource Quantities and Geographical Distribution".World Energy Council. 2007. Archived fromthe originalon 24 August 2010.
  41. ^Shawn, Munro (25 November 2013).Peace River proceeding no. 1769924(PDF)(Report). Phase II submissions. Vol. 4. Calgary, Alberta.
  42. ^Christopher J. Schenk; Troy A. Cook; Ronald R. Charpentier; Richard M. Pollastro; Timothy R. Klett; Marilyn E. Tennyson; Mark A. Kirschbaum; Michael E. Brownfield & Janet K. Pitman. (11 January 2010)."An Estimate of Recoverable Heavy Oil Resources of the Orinoco Oil Belt, Venezuela"(PDF).USGS.Retrieved23 January2010.
  43. ^abVassiliou, M.S. (2 March 2009).Historical Dictionary of the Petroleum Industry.Scarecrow Press. p. 216.ISBN978-0810859937.
  44. ^"Secure Fuels from Domestic Resources"(PDF).
  45. ^abU.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) (2008)."Tar sands basics".Argonne National Laboratory. Archived fromthe originalon 4 September 2014.Retrieved14 May2008.
  46. ^"HeavyOil Russia"(PDF).Rigzone. Summer 2006.[permanent dead link]
  47. ^"Madagascar Produces First 45 Barrels of Oil". BBC Monitoring Africa. 14 March 2008.
  48. ^"Madagascar Oil raises $85M for exploration, opens new head office".Rigzone. 29 March 2007.
  49. ^"Canadian Energy Overview 2007".National Energy Board of Canada. May 2007.Retrieved23 July2008.
  50. ^"Fort Hills Oilsands".Oilweek.com.Retrieved4 May2011.
  51. ^ab2012 Tailings Management Assessment Report: Oil Sands Mining Industry(PDF),Calgary, Alberta: Energy Resources Conservation Board (ERCB), June 2013, archived fromthe original(PDF)on 25 February 2014,retrieved12 April2014
  52. ^"Ecocide must be listed alongside genocide as an international crime".The Guardian.22 June 2021.ISSN0261-3077.Retrieved21 June2023.
  53. ^"Tar sands: tearing the flesh from the Earth".theecologist.org.18 August 2009.Retrieved21 June2023.
  54. ^"Indigenous groups say Big Oil's pollution threatens their existence in Canadian forest".NBC News.22 November 2021.Retrieved21 June2023.
  55. ^"Trudeau Is Betting $9 Billion on a Plan to Clean Up the World's Dirtiest Oil".Bloomberg.com.5 June 2023.Retrieved21 June2023.
  56. ^Weisbrod, Katelyn (21 November 2021)."Canada's Tar Sands: Destruction So Vast and Deep It Challenges the Existence of Land and People".Inside Climate News.Retrieved21 June2023.
  57. ^"The terrible toll of tar sands mining on Canada's Native people".Mother Jones.Retrieved21 June2023.
  58. ^Stillger, Nicole (23 October 2022)."Alberta's oil production booming but majority of revenue leaving province".Global News.Retrieved1 December2023.
  59. ^Bakx, Kyle (12 October 2023)."Canada could lead the world in oil production growth in 2024".CBC.Retrieved1 December2023.
  60. ^Garcia-Navarro, Lulu (5 July 2016)."Venezuela Is In Crisis. Its Economy Is In A Tailspin".US National Public Radio.Retrieved6 July2016.Things are very, very bad. I have been covering Venezuela for a long time. And frankly, I was shocked at the situation as I see it here at the moment.
  61. ^"Eni and the Republic of Congo launch a new integrated model of cooperation"(Press release). Point Noire, Congo:Eni.19 May 2008.
  62. ^"The oil sands story: in situ".
  63. ^Maurice Dusseault (March 2002)."Cold Heavy Oil Production with Sand in the Canadian Heavy Oil Industry".Alberta Energy. Archived fromthe originalon 29 March 2008.Retrieved21 May2008.
  64. ^"Jackpine mine".Westernoilsands.com.Retrieved4 May2011.
  65. ^"Canada, United States: SOLAR Power Process Transform Oil Sands Tailings",Mena Report,26 September 2014, archived fromthe originalon 29 March 2015,retrieved2 December2014
  66. ^abc"Fact Sheet Tailings"(PDF),Government of Alberta,September 2013, archived fromthe original(PDF)on 25 March 2014,retrieved12 April2014
  67. ^Safe dam constructions – Seminar on safe tailings dam constructions(PDF),Gallivare: Swedish Mining Association, Natur Vards Verket, European Commission, 19–20 September 2001,retrieved25 February2014
  68. ^"GL 97-02 Guidelines for the Application of Oil Byproducts to Municipal Roads in Saskatchewen"(PDF).Saskatchewan Energy and Mines. 1997.Retrieved21 May2008.
  69. ^Beattie, C. I.; Boberg, T. C.; McNab, G. S. (5 April 1989)."Reservoir Simulation of Cyclic Steam Stimulation in the Cold Lake Oil Sands".All Days.OnePetro.doi:10.2118/18752-MS.
  70. ^abButler, Roger (1991).Thermal Recovery of Oil and Bitumen.Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. p. 104.
  71. ^"Operations – Oil sands – Foster Creek".Cenovus.com.Retrieved18 February2011.
  72. ^"Operations – Oil sands – Christina Lake".Cenovus.com.Retrieved18 February2011.
  73. ^"Natural Resources Canada team investigates solvent extraction process for oil sand bitumen; non-aqueous alternative to hot water processing with reduced environmental impacts".Green Car Congress.BioAge Group, LLC. 16 January 2012.
  74. ^"VAPEX and Solvent Technology".Oil Sands Developers Group.Retrieved11 July2012.
  75. ^"The THAI Process".Petrobank Energy and Resources Ltd.Archived fromthe originalon 28 August 2008.Retrieved7 December2008.
  76. ^"A new method of extracting heavy oil: Toe to Heel Air Injection (THAI)".The Oil Drum.27 August 2007.Retrieved7 December2008.
  77. ^"EROI update: preliminary results using Toe-to-Heel Air Injection".The Oil Drum.18 March 2009.Retrieved19 March2009.
  78. ^"Petrobank announces first THAI/CAPRI production".Petrobank. 22 September 2008.Retrieved7 December2008.
  79. ^Cooper, Dave (29 November 2008)."Petrobank wins approval for heavy-oil project expansion".The Edmonton Journal.Retrieved7 December2008.
  80. ^Chandler, Graham (September 2008)."What lies beneath".Oilweek.Retrieved7 December2008.
  81. ^Healing, Dan (September 2013)."Petrobank cuts budget on production setback".The Calgary Herald.Retrieved13 August2013.
  82. ^Chandler, Graham (March 2009)."Excelsior to test COGD bitumen production".Schlumberger.Retrieved8 April2010.
  83. ^Rao, Feng; Liu, Qi (19 December 2013). "Froth Treatment in Athabasca Oil Sands Bitumen Recovery Process: A Review".Energy and Fuels.27(12): 7199–7207.doi:10.1021/ef4016697.ISSN0887-0624.
  84. ^ab"Froth Treatment".CanmetENERGY via NRCan.Devon, Alberta. 19 January 2016.Retrieved29 January2020.
  85. ^"Appendix VI – Fact Sheets"(PDF).Alberta Oil Sands Consultations Multistakeholder Committee Interim Report.Government of Alberta. 30 November 2006. p. 14. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 7 March 2007.Retrieved17 August2007.
  86. ^Canada's Oil Sands – Opportunities and Challenges to 2015: An Update(PDF)(Report). National Energy Board. June 2006. p. 17.Retrieved14 August2007.
  87. ^"Technology".
  88. ^Martínez-Palou, Rafael; Mosqueira, María de Lourdes; Zapata-Rendón, Beatriz; Mar-Juárez, Elizabeth; Bernal-Huicochea, César; de la Cruz Clavel-López, Juan; Aburto, Jorge (1 January 2011)."Transportation of heavy and extra-heavy crude oil by pipeline: A review".Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering.75(3): 274–282.doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2010.11.020.ISSN0920-4105.
  89. ^"Alberta Oil Sands Bitumen Valuation Methodology",CAPP,Technical Publication, 20 November 2013,retrieved13 December2013
  90. ^"WCS at Cushing: The emerging US trading center for Canada's heavy sour crude",Argus,Argus White Paper, Argus Media, 2012, archived fromthe originalon 2 April 2015,retrieved24 March2015
  91. ^Natural Resources Canada (May 2011).Canadian Crude Oil, Natural Gas and Petroleum Products: Review of 2009 & Outlook to 2030(PDF)(Report). Ottawa, ON: Government of Canada.ISBN978-1-100-16436-6.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 3 October 2013.Retrieved24 March2015.
  92. ^"Platts Assesses Ex-Cushing Western Canadian Select at $70.78 per Barrel: Brings transparency to the US value of Canadian Oil as Seaway Takes Oil to Gulf",Platts,Houston, Texas, 1 June 2012
  93. ^"Western Canadian Select Heavy Oil blend",TMX/Shorcan Energy Brokers
  94. ^Mohr, Patricia (20 February 2014),Scotiabank Commodity Price Index(PDF),Scotiabank, archived fromthe original(PDF)on 8 December 2014,retrieved22 February2014
  95. ^"Cost Analysis and Reporting Enhancement – Glossary of Terms"(PDF),Alberta Energy,4 May 2011,retrieved25 December2014
  96. ^Gray, Murray."Tutorial on Upgrading of Oilsands Bitumen"(PDF).ualberta.ca.University of Alberta.Retrieved28 April2014.
  97. ^ab"ST98-2013: Alberta's Energy Reserves 2012 and Supply/Demand Outlook 2013–2022"(PDF).Alberta Energy Regulator. May 2013.Retrieved23 April2015.
  98. ^"Upgrading and Refining"(PDF).energy.alberta.ca.Government of Alberta.Retrieved28 April2014.
  99. ^Healing, Dan (3 April 2014)."Bitumen diluent demand expected to double by 2020".calgaryherald.com.Calgary Herald.Retrieved28 April2014.
  100. ^"At the Wellhead: Venezuela's upgraders are maxed out to handle its heavy oil".platts.com.Platts, McGraw Hill Financial.Retrieved6 May2014.
  101. ^Ancheyta Jorge; Rana Mohan S.; Furimsky Edward (30 November 2005). "Hydroprocessing of heavy petroleum feeds: Tutorial".Catalysis Today.109(1–4): 3–15.doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2005.08.025.ISSN0920-5861.
  102. ^"Upgrading and Refining"(PDF).Alberta Department of Energy. 10 February 2014.Retrieved5 May2014.
  103. ^Howell, David (21 January 2015)."Other projects' layoffs expected to help Sturgeon Refinery".Edmonton Journal.Edmonton, Alberta.
  104. ^"Company Profile".North West Upgrading.2015.Retrieved16 April2015.
  105. ^"A better way to move oil by rail".Pacific Future Energy.Retrieved6 July2016.
  106. ^"China overtakes US as the biggest importer of oil".BBC News.10 October 2013.Retrieved11 May2014.
  107. ^"US Imports from Canada of Crude Oil and Petroleum Products".U.S.Energy Information Administration.29 April 2014.Retrieved28 May2014.
  108. ^Hackett, David; Noda, Leigh; Moore, Michal C.; Winter, Jennifer (February 2013)."Pacific Basin Heavy Oil Refining Capacity"(PDF).SPP Research Papers.University of Calgary School of Public Policy.Retrieved22 May2014.
  109. ^Luneau, Kate (8 August 2012)."Our Chinese oil sands".Maclean's Magazine.Retrieved28 May2014.
  110. ^ab"Canada's Energy Future 2013 – Energy Supply and Demand Projections to 2035 – An Energy Market Assessment".neb-one.gc.ca.National Energy Board of Canada (NEB). November 2013.Retrieved20 April2014.
  111. ^abMillington, Dinara; Murillo, Carlos A. (August 2015)."Canadian Oil Sands Supply Costs and Development Projects (2015–2046)"(PDF).ceri.ca.Canadian Energy Research Institute.Retrieved6 November2015.
  112. ^abCERI Commodity Report — Crude Oil(PDF)(Report).Canadian Energy Research Institute.June 2015.Retrieved6 November2015.
  113. ^"Cushing, OK Crude Oil Future Contract 1".eia.gov.U.S. Energy Information Administration.Retrieved24 December2014.
  114. ^Millington, Dinara; Murillo, Carlos A. (May 2013)."Canadian Oil Sands Supply Costs and Development Projects (2012–2046)"(PDF).ceri.ca.Canadian Energy Research Institute.Retrieved24 April2014.
  115. ^Pope, Carl (8 July 2015)."Why You Should Short Public Oil Companies".Bloomberg News.Bloomberg L.P.Retrieved6 November2015.
  116. ^abPenty, Rebecca; van Loon, Jeremy (17 June 2015)."Oil-Sands Megaproject Era Wanes as Suncor Scales Back".Bloomberg News.Bloomberg L.P.Retrieved6 November2015.
  117. ^Austen, Ian (12 October 2015)."Oil Sands Boom Dries Up in Alberta, Taking Thousands of Jobs With It".International New York Times.Retrieved7 November2015.
  118. ^Dawson, Chester (27 October 2015)."Royal Dutch Shell to Abandon Carmon Creek Oil-Sands Project".The Wall Street Journal.Dow Jones & Company.Retrieved7 November2015.
  119. ^Williams, Nia (19 August 2015)."Even losing $6 per barrel, top Canada oil sands project unlikely to close".Reuters.Retrieved7 November2015.
  120. ^Morgan, Geoffrey (27 March 2020)."Canadian heavy oil collapses another 28% to under $5 as oilsands face shut-ins | Financial Post".Financial Post.Archivedfrom the original on 30 March 2020.
  121. ^McElwee, Sean; Daly, Lew (23 December 2013).Beware of the Carbon Bubble(Report).Demos.Retrieved6 November2015.
  122. ^Koring, Paul (6 November 2015)."Obama rejects TransCanada's Keystone XL pipeline".The Globe and Mail. Archived fromthe originalon 20 January 2016.Retrieved6 November2015.
  123. ^abShilling,A. Gary (20 August 2015)."A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to $80 Oil".Bloomberg News.Bloomberg L.P.Retrieved6 November2015.
  124. ^Kolbert, Elizabeth (24 August 2015)."The Weight of the World".The New Yorker.Condé Nast.Retrieved6 November2015.
  125. ^abSussams, Luke; Leaton, James; Drew, Tom (21 October 2015).Lost in Transition: How the energy sector is missing potential demand destruction(Report). Carbon Tracker.Retrieved6 November2015.
  126. ^Dale, Spencer (13 October 2015).New Economics of Oil(PDF)(Report). BP.Retrieved6 November2015.
  127. ^Dyer, Evan (7 January 2015)."Climate change study says most of Canada's oil reserves should be left underground".cbc.ca/news.Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.Retrieved6 November2015.
  128. ^Jacob, Michael; Hilaire, Jérȏme (January 2015)."Unburnable fossil-fuel reserves".Nature.517(7533).Macmillan Publishers:150–2.Bibcode:2015Natur.517..150J.doi:10.1038/517150a.PMID25567276.S2CID4449048.
  129. ^McGlade, Christophe; Ekins, Paul (January 2015)."The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2°C"(PDF).Nature.517(7533).Macmillan Publishers:187–90.Bibcode:2015Natur.517..187M.doi:10.1038/nature14016.PMID25567285.S2CID4454113.
  130. ^Prudent Development: Realizing the Potential of North America's Abundant Natural Gas and Oil Resources(PDF),National Petroleum Council, 2011, p. 22,retrieved12 April2014
  131. ^R. Smandych and R. Kueneman, "The Canadian-Alberta Tar Sands: A Case Study of State-Corporate Environmental Crime" in R. White (ed.)Global Environmental Harm.Cullompton: willan, 2010
  132. ^Kelly, EN; Schindler, DW; Hodson, PV; Short, JW; Radmanovich, R; Nielsen, CC (14 September 2010)."Oil sands development contributes elements toxic at low concentrations to the Athabasca River and its tributaries".PNAS.107(37): 16178–83.Bibcode:2010PNAS..10716178K.doi:10.1073/pnas.1008754107.PMC2941314.PMID20805486.
  133. ^"Stop the Tar sands to curb Canada's growing greenhouse gas emissions".Greenpeace Canada.2011. Archived fromthe originalon 25 October 2007.Retrieved9 September2011.
  134. ^"Alberta Tar Sands: A North American Overview".TreeHugger.Archived fromthe originalon 30 August 2011.Retrieved18 April2008.
  135. ^Researchers find 7,300-sq-mile ring of mercury around tar sands in Canadahttp://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2013/12/29/7-500-mile-ring-ofmercuryfoundaroundcanadastarsands.html
  136. ^Carrington, Damian (20 February 2012)."Canada threatens trade war with EU over tar sands".The Guardian.London.Retrieved21 February2012.
  137. ^Vincent McDermott (11 May 2012)."Oilsands less polluting than EU claims: report".Fort McMurray Today.
  138. ^Barbara Lewis, David Ljunggren & Jeffrey Jones (10 May 2012)."Canada's Tar Sands Battle With Europe".huffington post. Reuters.
  139. ^Parajulee, Abha; Wania, Frank (3 February 2014)."Evaluating officially reported polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon emissions in the Athabasca oil sands region with a multimedia fate model".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.111(9): 3344–3349.Bibcode:2014PNAS..111.3344P.doi:10.1073/pnas.1319780111.PMC3948256.PMID24596429.
  140. ^Visconti, Grace C. (23 February 2014),Op-Ed: University of Toronto researchers share oil sands study results,Scarborough, Ontario,retrieved24 February2014{{citation}}:CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  141. ^"Continuous Monitoring".Wood Buffalo Environmental Association.Retrieved6 November2015.
  142. ^"Alberta's Oil Sands: Air".Government of Alberta Environment and Water.Retrieved6 November2015.
  143. ^"Air Quality and the Oil Sands".Government of Alberta Environment and Water.Retrieved16 January2012.
  144. ^"Province orders Suncor to address excessiveH
    2
    S
    emissions "
    (Press release). Government of Alberta. 18 December 2007.
  145. ^"About CASA".Archived fromthe originalon 3 February 2015.Retrieved7 November2015.
  146. ^"Exceedance Reports".Clean Air Strategic Alliance.Retrieved6 November2015.
  147. ^Odour issues in Alberta(PDF)(Report). Pembina Institute. September 2015.Retrieved6 November2015.
  148. ^"Does oil sands" mining "affect the environment?".Oil sands frequently asked questions.Government of Alberta Energy ministry. Archived fromthe originalon 18 October 2017.Retrieved9 April2009.
  149. ^Mosher, Dave (6 November 2015)."Fly over an environmental nightmare the US just avoided".Business Insider Inc.Retrieved6 November2015.
  150. ^"Environmental Protection"(PDF).
  151. ^"Reclamation".Government of AlbertaEnvironment ministry. Archived fromthe originalon 25 September 2014.Retrieved10 December2013.
  152. ^"Alberta issues first-ever oil sands land reclamation certificate"(Press release). Government of Alberta. 19 March 2008.Retrieved11 February2012.
  153. ^"Land reclamation"(PDF).Alberta oil sands consultations.
  154. ^"Water depletion".Greenpeace Canada. 25 October 2007.Retrieved12 February2012.
  155. ^Canada's oil sands – opportunities and challenges to 2015: an update(Report). National Energy Board. June 2006. p. 38.Retrieved14 August2007.
  156. ^"Longest rivers in Canada".Environment Canada.
  157. ^"Athabasca river water management framework"(PDF).2 October 2007.
  158. ^"Typical river flows".Environment Canada.
  159. ^"Environmental aspects of oil sands development".Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers. Archived fromthe originalon 11 December 2008.Retrieved16 April2008.
  160. ^"Athabasca River water management framework".Government of AlbertaEnvironment ministry. Archived fromthe originalon 14 May 2007.Retrieved16 April2008.
  161. ^"A Foundation for the Future: Building an Environmental Monitoring System for the Oil Sands".Monitoring Organizations in the Oil Sands Area.Environment Canada.Retrieved4 April2011.
  162. ^"Monitoring of oilsands impact inadequate: panel".CBC. 9 March 2011.Retrieved4 April2011.
  163. ^Gardner, Timothy (19 May 2009)."Canada oil sands emit more CO2 than average: report".Reuters.Retrieved4 May2011.
  164. ^"Who's afraid of the tar sands?".Davidstrahan.com. 8 December 2009.Retrieved4 May2011.
  165. ^Lewis, Barbara; Ljunggren, David; Jones, Jeffrey (10 May 2012)."Insight: Canada's oil sand battle with Europe".Reuters.Retrieved27 August2013.
  166. ^Brandt, Adam R. (18 January 2011).Upstream greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from Canadian oil sands as a feedstock for European refineries(PDF)(Report).Retrieved30 January2020.
  167. ^Israel, Benjamin; Gorski, Jan; Simpson-Marran, Morrigan (October 2018).The oilsands in a decarbonizing Canada(PDF).Pembina Institute. p. 2.Retrieved1 December2023.
  168. ^Weber, Bob (24 April 2023)."Oilsands emissions 65% higher than tallied by current measuring methods, study suggests".CBC.Retrieved1 December2023.
  169. ^"Climate change".Greenpeace Canada. 25 October 2007. Archived fromthe originalon 14 January 2012.Retrieved21 March2013.
  170. ^"Environmental challenges and progress in Canada's oil sands".CAPP.April 2008.
  171. ^"Climate change plan for Canada"(PDF).November 2002.
  172. ^"Oil sands fever: the environmental implications of Canada's oil sands rush"(PDF).Pembina Institute.2005.
  173. ^"Canada's oil sands: opportunities and challenges to 2015: An update"(PDF).National Energy Board.June 2006.
  174. ^IHS (21 September 2010)."Oil Sands Greenhouse Gas Emissions are Lower than Commonly Perceived, IHS CERA Analysis Finds".(Information Handling Services).Retrieved19 October2010.
  175. ^Neil C. Swart; Andrew J. Weaver (19 February 2012). "The Alberta oil sands and climate".Nature Climate Change.2(3): 134.Bibcode:2012NatCC...2..134S.doi:10.1038/nclimate1421.(supplement)
  176. ^Bergerson, Joule A. et al., Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Current Oil Sands Technologies: Surface Mining and In Situ Applications, Environmental Science & Technology 46 (14), pp. 7865–7874, 2012.
  177. ^"Accelerating Carbon Capture and Storage Implementation in Alberta, Final Report"(PDF).Alberta Carbon Capture and Storage Development Council. 24 July 2009.
  178. ^"Alberta surges ahead with climate change action plan"(Press release). Government of Alberta Environment ministry. 8 July 2008.Retrieved9 April2009.
  179. ^"Alberta Energy: Carbon Capture and Storage".Government of Alberta Energy ministry.Retrieved9 April2009.
  180. ^"Aspen Institute announces winners of the second annual Aspen Institute Energy and Environment Awards"(Press release). Aspen Institute. 18 March 2009.
  181. ^Yadullah, Hussain (27 November 2014)."New emissions from Canada's oil sands" extremely low, "says IEA's chief economist".National Post.Retrieved28 November2014.
  182. ^McCarthy, Shawn (17 November 2014)."Oil sands not a major source of climate change: IEA economist".The Globe and Mail.Retrieved28 November2014.
  183. ^Lattanzio, Richard K. (14 March 2014).Canadian Oil Sands: Life-Cycle Assessments of Greenhouse Gas Emissions(PDF)(Report).Congressional Research Service.Retrieved7 November2015.
  184. ^EN Kelly; JW Short; DW Schindler; PV Hodson; M Ma; AK Kwan; BL Fortin (2009)."Oil sands development contributes polycyclic aromatic compounds to the Athabasca River and its tributarie".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.106(52): 22346–22351.Bibcode:2009PNAS..10622346K.doi:10.1073/pnas.0912050106.PMC2789758.PMID19995964.
  185. ^Weber, Bob (17 September 2010)."Deformed fish found in lake downstream from oilsands".Toronto Star.Retrieved19 September2010.
  186. ^"RAMP Steering Committee Membership - Regional Aquatics Monitoring Program (RAMP)".www.ramp-alberta.org.Retrieved8 June2021.
  187. ^"RAMP responds to a request for comment on Dr. David Schindler's press conference regarding the high incidence of fish abnormalities".Regional Aquatics Monitoring Program (RAMP). 16 September 2010.Retrieved18 February2011.
  188. ^"Frequently Asked Questions".Regional Aquatics Monitoring Program (RAMP).Retrieved18 February2011.
  189. ^"Mixed reports on safety of eating northern Alberta game".CBC News.3 April 2007.
  190. ^"High cancer rates confirmed near Canada's oil sands".Reuters.6 February 2009.
  191. ^abcOil sands foes ignore the facts as cancer claims dealt a blow by studyby Claudia Cattaneo,Financial Post,March 24, 2014.
  192. ^"Cancer rates downstream from oil sands to be probed".CBC News.19 August 2011. Archived fromthe originalon 20 August 2011.

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]