Jump to content

Cult and Ritual Abuse

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Cult and Ritual Abuse: Its History, Anthropology, and Recent Discovery in Contemporary America
1995 first edition cover
AuthorRandy Noblitt and Pamela Perskin
LanguageEnglish
SubjectSatanic ritual abuse
GenreNon-fiction
PublisherPraeger Publishing
Publication placeUnited States
Published in English
1995/2000
Media typeHardcover
Pages225 (1st ed.)
269 (2nd ed.)
ISBN0-275-95281-9(1st ed.)
027596664X (2nd ed.)

Cult and Ritual Abuse: Its History, Anthropology, and Recent Discovery in Contemporary Americais a book written by James Randall Noblitt and Pamela Sue Perskin exploring the phenomenon ofsatanic ritual abuse(SRA). The authors argue that some allegations of intergenerational, ritualized abuse cults are supported by evidence, contrary to most scholars of the subject who regard satanic ritual abuse as amoral panicwith no factual basis.[1]Noblitt, a clinicalpsychologist,is Director of the Center for Counseling and Psychological Services inDallas,Texas.Perskin is the executive director of the International Council on Cultism and Ritual Trauma and a lecturer onchild abuse.

Cult and Ritual Abusewas first published in 1995; a revised edition followed in 2000. The book has been called the most reasonable review of the pro-conspiracy version of SRA to date, but was also criticized for being incoherent, inconsistent, uneven, filled withlogical fallaciesand for citing proven frauds as evidence.

Reviews

[edit]

Both editions of the book have been reviewed several times.

First edition

[edit]

Joel Best,a professor of criminal justice and sociology, describedCult and Ritual Abuseas having the "trappings" of a scholarly book, but as ultimately incoherent. He pointed out that even Noblitt and Perskin state their evidence is not compelling. Despite acknowledging the need for parsimony as inOccam's razor(i.e., favoring the simplest explanation that accounts for the evidence), Best notes the authors accept the less parsimonious proposition: that multigenerational, multinational abusive entities exist and have existed for centuries without discovery, rather than the more parsimonious idea that the patients are disturbed, malingering or mistaken. Best also drew attention tospecial pleadingused by Noblitt and Perskin to support the stories of their patients. Best concluded that in order to understand the debate regarding SRA one must read the sceptical literature.[2]

LeRoy Schultz,Professor Emeritusofsocial workatWest Virginia University,described the book as a very selective review of the literature on SRA, citing only work that supports their point of view, and failing to address the issue ofclinicalversusempirical evidence.[3]

A review in theAmerican Journal of Psychotherapystated that the book was probably the most reasonable review of the subject to date.[4]

Second edition

[edit]

Two reviews of the second edition refer to the book as an overview of the topic, and as a vehicle to advocate for the inclusion of cult and ritual trauma abuse in theDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,or DSM—the widely used guide for diagnosing mental disorders.[5][6]

Edward L. King reviewed the book from aFreemason'sperspective. He pointed out that Noblitt and Perskis cite cases that were known as frauds before the first edition ofCult and Ritual Abuse,such asMichael Warnke's claims to have been involved satanism (debunked in 1991) and theTaxil hoaxfrom the 1890s, without qualification or noting that these examples were faked. King also pointed to the dubiousness of Noblitt's qualifications and certifications, concluding that what "[Noblit and Perskin] consider" research "is merely a self-serving screed designed to enhance their so-called 'professional' status as treating" satanic ritual abuse. "[7]

Editions

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^See:
  2. ^Best, Joel (1996). "Book Review: Cult and Ritual Abuse: Its History, Anthropology, and Recent Discovery in Contemporary America".Criminal Justice Review.21:103–105.doi:10.1177/073401689602100119.S2CID143713425.
  3. ^Schultz, L (1995)."Book Review: Cult and Ritual Abuse: Its History, Anthropology and Recent Discovery in Contemporary America".Issues in Child Abuse Accusations.7(4).
  4. ^Coomaraswamy, R. (Summer 1996)."Cult and Ritual Abuse: Its History, Anthropology and Recent Discovery in Contemporary America".American Journal of Psychotherapy.50(3): 383–384.doi:10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1996.50.3.383.
  5. ^Fletcher, K. (July 2001). "Cult and ritual abuse: Its history, anthropology, and recent discovery in contemporary America, revised edition".Psychiatric Services.52(7): 978–979.doi:10.1176/appi.ps.52.7.978.S2CID73341614.
  6. ^Schmuttermaier, J.R. (2001). "Cult and Ritual Abuse: Sadism not Sophism".Contemporary Psychology.46(6): 615–617.doi:10.1037/002384.
  7. ^King, EL."Book review: Cult & Ritual Abuse - Its History, Anthropology, and Recent Discovery in Contemporary America".Archived fromthe originalon 2015-03-16.Retrieved2009-04-05.