Jump to content

Dirichlet integral

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Peter Gustav Lejeune Dirichlet

Inmathematics,there are severalintegralsknown as theDirichlet integral,after the German mathematicianPeter Gustav Lejeune Dirichlet,one of which is theimproper integralof thesinc functionover the positive real line:

This integral is notabsolutely convergent,meaninghas infinite Lebesgue or Riemann improper integral over the positive real line, so the sinc function is notLebesgue integrableover the positive real line. The sinc function is, however, integrable in the sense of the improperRiemann integralor the generalized Riemann orHenstock–Kurzweil integral.[1][2]This can be seen by usingDirichlet's test for improper integrals.

It is a good illustration of special techniques for evaluating definite integrals, particularly when it is not useful to directly apply thefundamental theorem of calculusdue to the lack of an elementaryantiderivativefor the integrand, as thesine integral,an antiderivative of the sinc function, is not anelementary function.In this case, the improper definite integral can be determined in several ways: the Laplace transform, double integration, differentiating under the integral sign, contour integration, and the Dirichlet kernel.

Evaluation

[edit]

Laplace transform

[edit]

Letbe a function defined wheneverThen itsLaplace transformis given by if the integral exists.[3]

A property of theLaplace transform useful for evaluating improper integralsis providedexists.

In what follows, one needs the resultwhich is the Laplace transform of the function(see the section 'Differentiating under the integral sign' for a derivation) as well as a version ofAbel's theorem(a consequence of thefinal value theorem for the Laplace transform).

Therefore,

Double integration

[edit]

Evaluating the Dirichlet integral using the Laplace transform is equivalent to calculating the same double definite integral by changing theorder of integration,namely, The change of order is justified by the fact that for all,the integral is absolutely convergent.

Differentiation under the integral sign (Feynman's trick)

[edit]

First rewrite the integral as a function of the additional variablenamely, the Laplace transform ofSo let

In order to evaluate the Dirichlet integral, we need to determineThe continuity ofcan be justified by applying thedominated convergence theoremafter integration by parts. Differentiate with respect toand apply theLeibniz rule for differentiating under the integral signto obtain

Now, using Euler's formulaone can express the sine function in terms of complex exponentials:

Therefore,

Integrating with respect togives

whereis a constant of integration to be determined. Sinceusing the principal value. This means that for

Finally, by continuity atwe haveas before.

Complex contour integration

[edit]

Consider


As a function of the complex variableit has a simple pole at the origin, which prevents the application ofJordan's lemma,whose other hypotheses are satisfied.

Define then a new function[4]

The pole has been moved to the negative imaginary axis, socan be integrated along the semicircleof radiuscentered atextending in the positive imaginary direction, and closed along the real axis. One then takes the limit

The complex integral is zero by theresidue theorem,as there are no poles inside the integration path:

The second term vanishes asgoes to infinity. As for the first integral, one can use one version of theSokhotski–Plemelj theoremfor integrals over the real line: for acomplex-valued functionfdefined and continuously differentiable on the real line and real constantsandwithone finds

wheredenotes theCauchy principal value.Back to the above original calculation, one can write

By taking the imaginary part on both sides and noting that the functionis even, we get

Finally,

Alternatively, choose as the integration contour forthe union of upper half-plane semicircles of radiiandtogether with two segments of the real line that connect them. On one hand the contour integral is zero, independently ofandon the other hand, asandthe integral's imaginary part converges to(hereis any branch of logarithm on upper half-plane), leading to

Dirichlet kernel

[edit]

Consider the well-known formula for theDirichlet kernel:[5]

It immediately follows that:

Define

Clearly,is continuous whento see its continuity at 0 applyL'Hopital's Rule:

Hence,fulfills the requirements of theRiemann-Lebesgue Lemma.This means:

(The form of the Riemann-Lebesgue Lemma used here is proven in the article cited.)

We would like to compute:

However, we must justify switching the real limit into the integral limit inwhich will follow from showing that the limit does exist.

Usingintegration by parts,we have:

Now, asandthe term on the left converges with no problem. See thelist of limits of trigonometric functions.We now show thatis absolutely integrable, which implies that the limit exists.[6]

First, we seek to bound the integral near the origin. Using the Taylor-series expansion of the cosine about zero,

Therefore,

Splitting the integral into pieces, we have

for some constantThis shows that the integral is absolutely integrable, which implies the original integral exists, and switching fromtowas in fact justified, and the proof is complete.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Bartle, Robert G.(10 June 1996)."Return to the Riemann Integral"(PDF).The American Mathematical Monthly.103(8): 625–632.doi:10.2307/2974874.JSTOR2974874.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 18 November 2017.Retrieved10 June2017.
  2. ^Bartle, Robert G.; Sherbert, Donald R. (2011). "Chapter 10: The Generalized Riemann Integral".Introduction to Real Analysis.John Wiley & Sons. pp.311.ISBN978-0-471-43331-6.
  3. ^Zill, Dennis G.; Wright, Warren S. (2013). "Chapter 7: The Laplace Transform".Differential Equations with Boundary-Value Problems.Cengage Learning. pp.274-5.ISBN978-1-111-82706-9.
  4. ^Appel, Walter.Mathematics for Physics and Physicists.Princeton University Press, 2007, p. 226.ISBN978-0-691-13102-3.
  5. ^Chen, Guo (26 June 2009).A Treatment of the Dirichlet Integral Via the Methods of Real Analysis(PDF)(Report).
  6. ^R.C. Daileda.Improper Integrals(PDF)(Report).
[edit]