Jump to content

Dommoc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Anglo-Saxon dioceses before 925

Dommoc(orDomnoc), a place not certainly identified but probably within the modern county ofSuffolk,was the original seat of theAnglo-Saxonbishops of theKingdom of East Anglia.It was established bySigeberht of East Angliafor SaintFelixinc. 629–631.It remained the bishopric of all East Anglia untilc. 673,whenTheodore of Tarsus,Archbishop of Canterbury, divided the see and created a second bishopric, theSee of Elmhamassociated with bothNorth Elmham,Norfolk andSouth Elmham,Suffolk. The see ofDommoccontinued to exist until the time of the Viking Wars of the 860s, after which it lapsed.

Foundation

[edit]

The primary authority for the foundation of the see ofDommocisBede'sHistoria ecclesiasticawhich stipulates Felix's mission in relation to Sigeberht's rule.[a][1]Following the assassination ofEorpwald of East AngliabyRicberhtinc. 627the kingdom fell back into "error" for three years, before Sigeberht, brother or half-brother of Eorpwald, took possession of the kingdom. Sigeberht had lived in exile inGaulduring his brother's lifetime, where he had been initiated in the sacraments of the Christian faith, becoming a very Christian man of learning. On his accession he resolved to ensure that the whole kingdom shared his faith and he was very ably supported by Saint Felix. Felix had been born and consecrated inBurgundy.He came to Archbishop Honorius of Canterbury (Saint Honorius) and expressed his desire to preach the Gospel of Life. Honorius sent him to the East Angles, where he found a fruitful multitude of believers and brought that whole province to the faith and works of righteousness. He accepted the episcopal seat in the city ('civitas') ofDommoc,and when he had governed it for seventeen years he died there in peace.[2]An alternative account surviving in the much later work ofWilliam of Malmesburyrelates that Sigeberht and Felix came to the kingdom together from Gaul.

Early chronology

[edit]

The date of the foundation ofDommocis estimated from the foregoing events and from the duration of tenure of the first three bishops.Edwin of Northumbriawas baptised byPaulinus of Yorkat Easter 626 and they then undertook the conversion of theKingdom of Lindseyand of Eorpwald and his kingdom. Eorpwald was slain soon after his baptism, after which there was a reversal of faith for three years. Felix was bishop for seventeen years, his successor Thomas for five, and his successorBerhtgisl Bonifacefor a further seventeen (a total of 39 episcopal years). Both Thomas and Berhtgisl were consecrated by Archbishop Honorius, who died in 653.[3]After Berhtgisl's death Archbishop Theodore, who reachedCanterburyin 668–689, appointedBisitoDommoc,and Bisi attended theCouncil of Hertfordin 673. By then Bisi's health was declining so that he was unable to administer the diocese and soon afterwards Theodore divided the see.[4]Since Berhtgisl cannot have died later than 670, the foundation ofDommocshould date toc. 630–631and the assassination of Eorpwald toc. 627.This would place the death of Felix atc. 647and of Thomasc. 652.That would accord with theLiber Eliensistradition that Felix baptised SaintÆthelthryth(Etheldreda) in or soon after 631 atExningand with William of Malmesbury's statement that he baptisedCenwalh of Wessexin East Anglia before that king was restored to Wessex byKing Annainc. 647.

Location

[edit]

Despite its former importance, the original location ofDommochas been lost for many centuries and forms the subject of scholarly debate. This reflects rival claims staked during the 13th century by the monks ofEye,Suffolk (forDunwich,Suffolk), and ofRochesterin Kent (forWalton, Suffolk). The uncertainty therefore arose between the tenth and twelfth centuries.William Camden,in hisBritannia,promoted general acceptance of the identification with Dunwich, formerly a splendid city on the Suffolk coast betweenAldeburghandSouthwold,all but a tiny part of which has now been lost to coastal erosion. The Rochester claim for Walton refers to the place near or inFelixstowe,Suffolk, at the tip of theColneis Hundredpeninsula between theRiver Debenand theRiver Orwell.This Walton is not to be confused withWalton-on-the-Naze,Essex, which stands on the south side of the Orwell andStourestuary mouth, and which has never been seriously considered as a candidate forDommoc.The scholarly revival of the claim for Walton asDommocwas the work of Stuart Rigold.[5][6][7]

Bede records that Sigeberht ruled East Anglia together withEcgric,his relative orcognatus,who until Sigeberht's abdication had ruled over part of the kingdom, and afterwards succeeded to the rule of all of it. The meaning of the arrangement is not clear, but there is no difficulty in accepting that during his own reign Sigeberht had the power to grant a coastal site to Felix either at Dunwich or Felixstowe, since it was he who granted the land, possibly an old shore fort, atCnobheresburgtoSaint Fursey.[8]

Bede's use of the termcivitasforDommoc,[b]suggests that the site had once been a Roman settlement, possibly fortified.[7]The re-use ofRoman fortsor fortified enclosures for early Anglo-Saxon ecclesiastical and monastic purposes is well-attested, for instance atOthona(Bradwell-on-Sea,Essex),RochesterandReculver(Kent),Durobrivae(Castor, Cambridgeshire), and in East Anglia at Fursey's monastery (probablyBurgh Castle,orGariannonum). It is certain that there was a stone fort at Walton (Walton Castle), like other shore-forts of about 6 acres (2.4 ha) enclosure, and that it was adjacent to a large Roman settlement, most of which (including the fort) is now lost into the sea.[9]The nature of Roman Dunwich is less well understood, for although some importantRoman roadslead towards it, the site was lost to the sea too early for archaeological records. However it formerly had an important harbour which might have been protected by a fort.[c]The placename evidence is also indecisive.

G.E. Fox and C.E. Stevens suggested that the fort at Walton might be thePortus Adurniof theNotitia Dignitatum,usually identified asPortchester.Be that as it may, the existence of additional forts not mentioned in theNotitiapresents no difficulty since that is not a list of all fortresses, but of military units and their stations under the command of theCount of the Saxon Shore.[11][12]

Dunwich

[edit]

The similarity of sound betweenDommocand Dunwich may be misleading.Dommocis a difficult name to construe,but could derive from theLatin:dominicum,[citation needed]a church, possibly in an Irish-assimilated formdomnach,as Fletcher notes.[13]The nameDunwich[d]should mean thewic'market', possibly fromvicus(often riverine or estuarine), 'at the hill'. Thewicnames for places of importance likeIpswichandNorwichare comparable. If the nameDommocbecame Dunwich, its original meaning was lost in the shift and a different etymological structure was adopted to explain and replace it, between the tenth and twelfth centuries.

There was no known church dedicated to Saint Felix at Dunwich, but that is no objection since the founder could not have commemorated himself and would likely have made an apostolic dedication. Dunwich was thriving atDomesday,but following sea encroachments many of its ecclesiastical possessions were granted to the risingPriory of Eyein north Suffolk. The seal-matrix of the last-known bishop ofDommoc,Ethilwald, was discovered about two hundred years ago at Eye. Eye also possessed in post-mediaeval times a book now lost, known as theRed Book of Eye,written inLombardicmajusculeand presumably with purple-stained pages, reputed to have belonged to Saint Felix. These may have reached Eye from Dunwich, but they might also have been taken toHoxne,close to Eye, during the tenth or eleventh centuries from any centre in East Anglia, when Hoxne was temporarily the episcopal seat.[14]

During the fifteenth century, when the Dunwich identification had taken hold, a series of glass windows depicting Saint Fursey, Saint Felix, Saint Etheldreda, and other Anglo-Saxon subjects existed atBlythburghchurch, not far from Dunwich. However, that site had its own independentWuffingtradition connected with the grave of KingAnna of East Anglia(died 653); conversely, its position at the fordable headwaters of theBlythestuary, controlling the Blyth and its watershed hinterland suggests the likely existence of a royal dwelling in that neighbourhood in the time of Anna himself, and of Saint Felix. If so, the siting of an episcopal seat at Dunwich would be readily explicable.

Felixstowe

[edit]

The apparent connection between Felixstowe and the name of Felix is suggestive, but the placename Felixstowe is not recorded before the thirteenth century and its origin is disputed. Astowmay be a holy site,[15]but the Domesday name for theWalton fortisburh,a form of the wordburgh.A priory dedicated to St Felix was founded within the fort at Walton around the end of the eleventh century byRoger Bigod, 1st Earl of Norfolk,who invited monks from Rochester to establish themselves there. During the twelfth century the powerful Bigod family also had a castle at Walton and a separate large residence there (the Manor, or Old Hall), at whichKing Johnissued theIpswichTown Charter in 1200.

The church site at nearbyFalkenham(overlooking the river Deben betweenHemleyand Felixstowe Ferry) may have early Wuffing associations, for it is dedicated to the royal martyrSaint Æthelberht(died 794). Falkenham was at Domesday a sub-manor or berewick of Walton, and in the time of ArchbishopLanfrancit was claimed by Rochester as one of a group of possessions which had been taken from it into royal keeping during theVikingWars.

The situation of Walton fort, overlooking the seaward reaches of the Deben estuary towards the former island ofBawdseyon the north bank, was of prime importance to the control of that river and lay directly within the sphere ofRendlesham,the Wuffinga royal dwelling known to have existed a little above the fordable headwaters of the Deben estuary inc. 660.TheSutton Hoocemetery demonstrates the outstanding importance of this river as a seat of regnal power shortly before Sigeberht's time, during the period ofRædwald's reign, and as the centre of a regio or province spreading from theOrwellto beyond theRiver Aldeand across the tributary hinterlands of the Alde and Deben rivers.

It is strongly implied[by whom?]that St Paulinus, from theCanterburymission, was present in East Anglia at Rædwald's court in around 616, and it seems likely that the dedication of Rendlesham church to SaintGregory the Greatbelongs to the early phases of that mission into East Anglia. After his escape fromYorkin 632–633, Paulinus became Bishop of Rochester until his deathc. 644,during the first decade of Felix's episcopacy ofDommoc.Bede records that Felix obtained teachers fromKentto supply the school founded in East Anglia by Sigeberht. Rochester was then the closest bishopric to East Anglia by the sea-route to Kent from the Deben. It is therefore possible that when Roger Bigod founded a priory at Walton fort, he was consciously renewing a connection between Rochester and Walton which had been developed in the time of Felix and Paulinus.

Rochester's claim is expressed thus: "b. Felix fundavit eccl'iam q'e m'o Felixstowe uocatur et in ea sedit xvji annis"['The blessed Felix founded the church which is now called Felixstowe and sate in that (place) 17 years']. It appears in the monastic register compiled before 1251 (Harleian MS 261), under the annal for 633. The 16th-centuryantiquary,John Lelandnoted sources supporting both the claims of Eye for Dunwich and of Rochester for Walton. There are, however, several East Anglian sites associated with the work of Saint Felix. Although one of these two seems more likely, there is no certainty that it was either.

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^The date is calculated as described in§ Early chronology.
  2. ^Dommocis also occasionally calledDomnocorDommoc-ceastre
  3. ^Similarly,Aldeburgh—which means 'old burgh' (aburghis 'a fortified place') inOld English—may also have possessed a fort defending the Alde estuary.[10]
  4. ^Inc. 1200DonewicorDonewiz

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^Bede 1969,II.15: "...accepitque sedem episcopatus in ciuitate Dommoc... "[and he received the seat of the episcopate in the city of Dommoc].
  2. ^Bede 1969,II.15.
  3. ^Bede 1969,III.20.
  4. ^Bede 1969,IV.5.
  5. ^Rigold 1961.
  6. ^Rigold 1974.
  7. ^abHaslam 1992.
  8. ^Bede 1969,III.17–18.
  9. ^Fairclough & Plunkett 2000.
  10. ^Field 1980,p. 22.
  11. ^Fox 1907.
  12. ^Stevens 1940.
  13. ^Fletcher 1998,p. 87: "Several Irish place-names derive from the Old Irish worddomnach;for example Donnybrook, Dublin, or Donaghmore in Co. Tyrone. The worddomnachis a loanword from the Latindominicum,meaning 'a church building'.
  14. ^Whitelock 1972.
  15. ^Field 1980,pp. 42, 167.

Sources

[edit]
  • Bede (1969). Colgrave, Bertram; Mynors, R. A. B. (eds.).Historia gentis Anglorum ecclesiastica[Bede's ecclesiastical history of the English people]. Translated by Bertram Colgrave; R. A. B. Mynors. Oxford: Clarendon Press.ISBN0-19-822202-5.
  • Fairclough, John; Plunkett, S. J. (2000). "Drawings of Walton Castle and other monuments in Walton and Felixstowe".Proceedings of the Suffolk Institute of Archaeology and History.39(4): 419–459.
  • Field, John (1980).Place-names of Great Britain and Ireland.Newton Abbot, Devon, UK: David & Charles.ISBN0389201545.OCLC6964610.
  • Fletcher, Richard A. (1998).The conversion of Europe: From Paganism to Christianity 371–1386 AD.London: Fontana.ISBN978-0-00-686302-1.
  • Fox, George E. (1907)."Romano-British Suffolk".In William Page (ed.).A History of Suffolk.The Victoria History of the Counties of England. Vol. I. Folkestone, Kent, UK: Victoria County House. pp. 279–323.ISBN978-0-7129-0647-0– via University of London, Institute of Historical Research.
  • Haslam, Jeremy (1992)."Dommocand Dunwich: A reappraisal "(PDF).Anglo-Saxon Studies in Archaeology and History.1992(5): 41–46.
  • Pestell, Tim (2004).Landscapes of monastic foundation: The establishment of religious houses in East Anglia c. 650-1200.Woodbridge, Suffolk, UK: Boydell Press.ISBN9781846152368.
  • Plunkett, Steven J. (2005).Suffolk in Anglo-Saxon times.Stroud, Gloucestershire, UK: Tempus.ISBN978-0752431390.
  • Rigold, S. E. (June 1961). "The Supposed See of Dunwich".Journal of the British Archaeological Association.24(1): 55–59.doi:10.1080/00681288.1961.11894745.
  • Rigold, S. E. (June 1974). "Further Evidence About the Site ofDommoc".Journal of the British Archaeological Association.37(1): 97–102.doi:10.1080/00681288.1974.11894960.
  • Scarfe, Norman (2004) [1984].Suffolk in the Middle Ages: Studies in places and place-names, the Sutton Hoo ship-burial, saints, mummies and crosses, Domesday Book, and chronicles of Bury Abbey.Woodbridge, UK: Boydell.ISBN9781843830689.
  • Stevens, C. E. (January 1940). "The British Sections of theNotitia Dignitatum".Archaeological Journal.97(1): 125–154.doi:10.1080/00665983.1940.10853729.
  • West, Stanley E. (1998). "A corpus of Anglo-Saxon material from Suffolk".East Anglian Archaeology.84.
  • Whitelock, Dorothy (January 1972). "The pre-Viking age church in East Anglia".Anglo-Saxon England.1:1–22.doi:10.1017/S0263675100000053.

Further reading

[edit]