eBird
![]() | |
Type of site | Wildlife database |
---|---|
Available in | 14 languages (but see Features, below) |
Created by | Cornell Lab of Ornithology |
URL | ebird |
Launched | 2002 |
Current status | Active |
eBirdis an onlinedatabaseofbirdobservations providingscientists,researchersandamateurnaturalists with real-time data aboutbird distribution and abundance.Originally restricted to sightings from theWestern Hemisphere,the project expanded to includeNew Zealandin 2008,[1]and again expanded to cover the whole world in June 2010.[2][3]eBird has been described as an ambitious example of enlistingamateursto gather data onbiodiversityfor use in science.[4]
eBird is an example ofcrowdsourcing,[5]and has been hailed as an example ofdemocratizing science,treatingcitizens as scientists,allowing the public to access and use their own data and the collective data generated by others.[6]
History and purpose
[edit]Launched in 2002 by theCornell Lab of OrnithologyatCornell Universityand theNational Audubon Society,[7]eBird gathers basic data on bird abundance and distribution at a variety of spatial and temporal scales. It was mainly inspired by theÉPOQ database ,created by Jacques Larivée in 1975.[8]As of May 12, 2021, there were over one billion bird observations recorded through this global database.[9]In recent years, there have been over 100 million bird observations recorded each year.[10]
eBird's goal is to maximize the utility and accessibility of the vast numbers of bird observations made each year by recreational and professionalbirders.The observations of each participant join those of others in an international network.[11]Due to the variability in the observations the volunteers make, AI filters observations through collected historical data to improve accuracy.[11]The data are then available via internet queries in a variety of formats.
Use of database information
[edit]The eBird Database has been used by scientists to determine the connection between bird migrations andmonsoonrains inIndiavalidating traditional knowledge.[12]It has also been used to notice bird distribution changes due toclimate changeand help to define migration routes.[13]A study conducted found that eBird lists were accurate at determining population trends and distribution if there were 10,000 checklists for a given area.[14]
Criticism of data
[edit]eBird participation in urban areas remains spatially biased with information from higher-income neighborhoods being represented much more. This suggests that eBird data should not be considered reliable for planning purposes, or to understand urban ecology of birds.[15]Such biases can be exacerbated due to events such as the COVID-19 outbreak when governmental policy restricted people's movements in many countries, which led to the data becoming greatly biased to urban locations relative to other habitats.[16]
In another study, eBird data provided a different estimate of suitable habitat for theNilgiri pipitrelative to data collected by scientists (combining field observations and literature review).[17]Authors therefore suggest that spatial distribution models based solely on eBird data should be regarded with caution.
eBird data sets have been shown to be biased not only spatially but temporally. While better roads and areas with denser human populations provided most of the data, eBird records also varied temporally with monthly fluctuations of uploads being very wide, and most of the data being provided on weekends.[18]Inferences based on analyses where eBird data is not corrected to account for such large-scale and long-term biases will yield a biased understanding that indicate eBirder behaviors more than bird behaviors.
A study pointing out that citizen-scientists possess different levels of skill and suggesting that analyses should incorporate corrections for observer bias used eBird as an example.[19]
Features
[edit]eBird documents the presence or absence of species, as well as bird abundance through checklist data. A web interface allows participants to submit their observations or view results via interactive queries of the database. Internet tools maintain personal bird records and enable users to visualize data with interactive maps, graphs, and bar charts. As of 2022, the eBird website is fully available in 14 languages (with different dialect options for three of them) and eBird supports common names for birds in 55 languages with 39 regional versions, for a total of 95 regional sets of common names.[20]
eBird is a free service. Data are stored in a secure facility and archived daily, and are accessible to anyone via the eBird web site and other applications developed by the globalbiodiversity informationcommunity. For example, eBird data are part of theAvian Knowledge Network(AKN), which integrates observational data on bird populations across the western hemisphere and is a data source for the digital ornithological referenceBirds of North America.In turn, the AKN feeds eBird data to international biodiversity data systems, such as theGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility.
Electronic kiosks
[edit]In addition to accepting records submitted from users' personal computers and mobile devices, eBird has placedelectronic kiosksin prime birding locations, including one in the education center at theJ. N. "Ding" Darling National Wildlife RefugeonSanibel IslandinFlorida.[21]
Integration in cars
[edit]eBird is a part of Starlink on the 2019SubaruAscent.It allows eBird to be integrated into the touch screen of the car.[22]
Extent of information
[edit]Bird checklists
[edit]eBird collects information worldwide, but the vast majority of checklists are submitted from North America. The numbers of checklists listed in the table below include only complete checklists, where observers report all of the species that they can identify throughout the duration of the checklist.
Location | Number of Bird Checklists | Percentage of Total |
---|---|---|
World | 90,393,583[23] | 100% |
Western Hemisphere | ||
Western Hemisphere | 74,953,085[24] | 82.92% |
Central America | 1,938,420[25] | 2.14% |
North America | 70,966,901[26] | 78.51% |
South America | 3,598,687[27] | 3.98% |
West Indies | 527,019[28] | 0.58% |
Eastern Hemisphere | ||
Eastern Hemisphere | 15,429,988[29] | 17.07% |
Africa | 771,914[30] | 0.85% |
Asia | 5,587,385[31] | 6.18% |
Australia and Territories | 2,444,214[32] | 2.7% |
Europe | 5,864,280[33] | 6.49% |
South Polar | ||
South Polar | 30,538[34] | 0.03% |
As of 29 February 2024[update] |
Regional portals
[edit]eBird involves a number of regional portals for different parts of the world, managed by local partners. These portals include the following, separated by region.[35]
United States
[edit]- Alaska eBird
- Arkansas eBird
- eBird Northwest
- Mass Audubon eBird
- Maine eBird
- eBird Missouri
- NJ Audubon eBird
- New Hampshire eBird
- Minnesota eBird
- Montana eBird
- Pennsylvania eBird
- Texas eBird
- Virginia eBird
- Vermont eBird
- Wisconsin eBird
Canada
[edit]- eBird Canada
- eBird Québec
Caribbean
[edit]- eBird Caribbean
- eBird Puerto Rico
Mexico
[edit]- eBird Mexico (aVerAves)
Central America
[edit]- eBird Central America
South America
[edit]- eBird Argentina
- eBird Brasil
- eBird Chile
- eBird Colombia
- eBird Paraguay
- eBird Peru
Europe
[edit]- eBird España
- PortugalAves
- eKuşbank (eBird Turkey)
Africa
[edit]- eBird Rwanda
- eBird Zambia
Asia
[edit]- eBird India
- eBird Israel
- eBird Japan
- eBird Malaysia
- eBird Singapore
- eBird Taiwan
Australia and New Zealand
[edit]- eBird Australia
- New Zealand eBird
Notes
[edit]- ^eBird New Zealand (2008)."About eBird".Cornell Lab of Ornithology.Archived fromthe originalon September 22, 2010.RetrievedJune 5,2010.
- ^Datta, Rangan (February 22, 2024)."Counting the winged guests at Rabindra Sarobar".The Telegraph. My Kolkata.RetrievedFebruary 26,2024.
- ^eBird (2010)."Global eBird almost there! -- 3 June update".Cornell Lab of Ornithology. Archived fromthe originalon June 3, 2010.RetrievedJune 5,2010.
- ^"The Role of Information Science in Gathering Biodiversity and Neuroscience Data"Archived2009-03-03 at theWayback Machine,Geoffrey A. Levin and Melissa H. Cragin,ASISTBulletin,Vol. 30, No. 1, Oct. 2003
- ^Robbins, Jim (August 19, 2013)."Crowdsourcing, for the Birds".The New York Times.ISSN0362-4331.RetrievedJanuary 18,2022.
- ^Cooper, Caren; Dickinson, Janis; Phillips, Tina; Bonney, Rick (November 20, 2008)."Science Explicitly for Nonscientists".Ecology and Society.13(2).doi:10.5751/ES-02602-1302r01.ISSN1708-3087.
- ^Sullivan, Brian; Wood, Christopher; Iliff, Marshall; Bonney, Rick."eBird: A citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences".Research Gate.RetrievedJuly 18,2020.
One such effort is eBird, a program launched by the Cornell Lab of Ornithology (CLO) and the National Audubon Society in 2002, which engages a vast network of human observers (citizen-scientists) to report bird observations using standardized protocols.
- ^"Étude des populations d'oiseaux du Québec".www.oiseauxqc.org.RetrievedJanuary 18,2022.
- ^eBird, Team."eBird passes 1 billion bird observations - eBird".ebird.org.RetrievedFebruary 28,2022.
- ^"About eBird".eBird.RetrievedJuly 18,2020.
- ^ab"Saving the Earth with Artificial Intelligence (AI)".Santa Monica Daily Press.June 25, 2018.RetrievedJuly 18,2020.
- ^"Meet the Cuckoo That Brings Monsoon Rain Across India, and How Tech Confirmed Its Magical Power".June 20, 2018.
- ^"España encabeza la lista europea en registros de observaciones de aves"(in Spanish). July 19, 2018.RetrievedJuly 18,2020.
- ^"Citizen science birding data passes scientific muster".Science Daily.RetrievedJuly 18,2020.
- ^Rosner, Hillary (November 21, 2023)."Why Warblers Flock to Wealthier Neighborhoods".The New York Times.
- ^Hochachka, W. M.; Alonso, H.; Gutiérrez-Expósito, C.; Miller, E. & Johnston, A. (2021)."Regional variation in the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the quantity and quality of data collected by the project eBird".Biol. Cons.254:108974.Bibcode:2021BCons.25408974H.doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2021.108974.PMC8486489.PMID34629475.
- ^Lele, A.; Arasumani, M.; Vishnudas, C. K.; Koparde, Pankaj; Joshi, Viral & Robin, V. V. (2023)."Ecological niche modelling reveals an elevated threat status for the Nilgiri Pipit (Anthus nilghiriensis) ".J. Ornith.165(2): 415–427.Bibcode:2023JOrni.165..415L.doi:10.1007/s10336-023-02133-0.S2CID266613870.
- ^Zhang, G. (2020)."Spatial and Temporal Patterns in Volunteer Data Contribution Activities: A Case Study of eBird".ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information.9(10): 597.Bibcode:2020IJGI....9..597Z.doi:10.3390/ijgi9100597.
- ^Kelling, S.; Johnston, S.; Hochachka, W. M.; Iliff, M.; Fink, D.; Gerbracht, J.; Lagoze, C.; LaSorte, F. A.; Moore, T.; Wiggnins, A.; Wong, Weng-Keen; Wood, C. & Yu, J (2015)."Can Observation Skills of Citizen Scientists Be Estimated Using Species Accumulation Curves?".PLOS ONE.10(10): e0139600.Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1039600K.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139600.PMC4599805.PMID26451728.
- ^"Bird Names in eBird".Help Center.RetrievedOctober 26,2022.
- ^"eBirding, citizen science topic of 'Ding' presentation".capecoralbreeze.com.RetrievedJanuary 18,2022.
- ^"Four Stand-Out Tech Features of the 2019 Subaru Ascent Limited".Forbes.
- ^"World".eBird.RetrievedFebruary 29,2024.
- ^"Western Hemisphere".eBird.RetrievedFebruary 29,2024.
- ^"Central America".eBird.RetrievedFebruary 29,2024.
- ^"North America".eBird.RetrievedFebruary 29,2024.
- ^"South America".eBird.RetrievedFebruary 29,2024.
- ^"West Indies".eBird.RetrievedFebruary 29,2024.
- ^"Eastern Hemisphere".eBird.RetrievedFebruary 29,2024.
- ^"Africa".eBird.RetrievedFebruary 29,2024.
- ^"Asia".eBird.RetrievedFebruary 29,2024.
- ^"Australia and Territories".eBird.RetrievedFebruary 29,2024.
- ^"Europe".eBird.RetrievedFebruary 29,2024.
- ^"South Polar".eBird.RetrievedFebruary 29,2024.
- ^"Regional portals & collaborators - eBird".ebird.org.RetrievedSeptember 25,2022.
References
[edit]- Chris Wood; Brian Sullivan; Marshall Iliff; Daniel Fink; Steve Kelling (2011), "eBird: Engaging Birders in Science and Conservation",PLOS Biology,9(12): e1001220,doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001220,PMC3243722,PMID22205876
- Dickinson, Janis L.; Zuckerberg, Benjamin; Bonter, David N. (2010), "Citizen Science as an Ecological Research Tool: Challenges and Benefits",Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics,41:149–172,doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144636,S2CID59402300
- Horns, Joshua J.; Adler, Frederick R.; Şekercioğlu, Çağan H. (2018), "Using opportunistic citizen science data to estimate avian population trends.",Biological Conservation,221:151–159,Bibcode:2018BCons.221..151H,doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2018.02.027
- Wiggins, Andrea (2011), "EBirding: Technology adoption and the transformation of leisure into science",Proceedings of the 2011 iConference,pp. 798–799,doi:10.1145/1940761.1940910,ISBN9781450301213,S2CID19598222
- Yudhijit Bhattacharjee (June 3, 2005), "Citizen Scientists Supplement Work of Cornell Researchers",Science,308(5727): 1402–1403,doi:10.1126/science.308.5727.1402,PMID15933178,S2CID153447103
External links
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/ff/Wikidata-logo.svg/40px-Wikidata-logo.svg.png)