Enriched Xenon Observatory

32°22′18″N103°47′37″W/ 32.37167°N 103.79361°W/32.37167; -103.79361

TheEnriched Xenon Observatory(EXO) is a particle physics experiment searching for neutrinolessdouble beta decayofxenon-136 atWIPPnear Carlsbad, New Mexico, U.S.

Neutrinolessdouble beta decay(0νββ) detection would prove theMajorananature of neutrinos and impact theneutrino massvalues and ordering. These are important open topics inparticle physics.

EXO currently has a 200-kilogram xenon liquidtime projection chamber(EXO-200) with R&D efforts on a ton-scale experiment (nEXO).Xenondouble beta decay was detected and limits have been set for 0νββ.

Overview

EXO measures the rate of neutrinoless decay events above the expectedbackgroundof similar signals, to find or limit the double beta decay half-life, which relates to the effective neutrino mass using nuclear matrix elements. A limit on effective neutrino mass below 0.01 eV would determine the neutrino mass order. The effective neutrino mass is dependent on the lightest neutrino mass in such a way that that bound indicates the normal mass hierarchy.^[1]

The expected rate of 0νββ events is very low, so background radiation is a significant problem. WIPP has 650 metres (2,130 ft) of rock overburden—equivalent to 1,600 metres (5,200 ft) of water—to screen incoming cosmic rays. Lead shielding and a cryostat also protect the setup. The neutrinoless decays would appear as narrow spike in the energy spectrum around the xenonQ-value(Q_ββ= 2457.8 keV), which is fairly high and above most gamma decays.

EXO-200

History

EXO-200 was designed with a goal of less than 40 events per year within two standard deviations of expected decay energy. This background was achieved by selecting and screening all materials for radiopurity. Originally the vessel was to be made of Teflon, but the final design of the vessel uses thin, ultra-pure copper.^[2]EXO-200 was relocated from Stanford toWIPPin the summer of 2007.^[3]Assembly and commissioning continued until the end of 2009 with data taking beginning in May 2011. Calibration was done using²²⁸Th,¹³⁷Cs, and⁶⁰Co gamma sources.

Design

The prototype EXO-200 uses a copper cylindricaltime projection chamberfilled with 150 kilograms (331 lb) of pure liquid xenon. Xenon is ascintillator,so decay particles produce prompt light which is detected byavalanche photodiodes,providing the event time. A large electric field drives ionization electrons to wires for collection. The time between the light and first collection determines the z coordinate of the event, while a grid of wires determines the radial and angular coordinates.

The EXO-200 cryostat installed underground at WIPP.
The EXO-200 cleanrooms installed underground at WIPP.

Results

The background from earth radioactivity(Th/U) and¹³⁷Xe contamination led to ≈2×10⁻³counts/(keV·kg·yr) in the detector. Energy resolution near Q_ββof 1.53% was achieved.^[4]

In August 2011, EXO-200 was the first experiment to observe double beta decay of¹³⁶Xe, with ahalf lifeof 2.11×10²¹years.^[5]This is the slowest directly observed process. An improved half life of 2.165 ±0.016(stat) ±0.059(sys) × 10²¹years was published in 2014.^[6]EXO set a limit on neutrinoless beta decay of 1.6×10²⁵years in 2012.^[7]A revised analysis of run 2 data with 100 kg·yr exposure, reported in the June issue ofNaturereduced the limits on half-life to 1.1×10²⁵yr, and mass to 450 meV.^[4]This was used to confirm the power of the design and validate the proposed expansion.

Additional running for two years was taken.

EXO-200 has performed two scientific operations, Phase I (2011-2014) and after upgrades, Phase II (2016 - 2018) for a total exposure of 234.1 kg·yr. No evidence of neutrinoless double beta decay has been found in the combined Phase I and II data, giving the lower bound of $3.5\cdot 10^{25}$ years for the half-life and upper mass of 239 meV.^[8]Phase II was the final operation of EXO-200.

nEXO

A ton-scale experiment, nEXO ( "next EXO" ), must overcome many backgrounds. The EXO collaboration is exploring many possibilities to do so, including barium tagging in liquid xenon. Any double beta decay event will leave behind a daughter barium ion, while backgrounds, such as radioactive impurities or neutrons, will not. Requiring a barium ion at the location of an event eliminates all backgrounds. Tagging of a single ion of barium has been demonstrated and progress has been made on a method for extracting ions out of the liquid xenon. A freezing probe method has been demonstrated, and gaseous tagging is also being developed.^[9]

The 2014 EXO-200 paper indicated a 5000 kg TPC can improve the background by xenon self-shielding and better electronics. Diameter would be increased to 130 cm and a water tank would be added as shielding and muon veto. This is much larger than the attenuation length for gamma rays. Radiopure copper for nEXO has been completed. It is planned for installation in theSNOLAB"Cryopit".^[10]^: 17^[11]^: 7

An Oct. 2017 paper details the experiment and discusses the sensitivity and the discovery potential of nEXO for neutrinoless double beta decay.^[12] Details on the ionization readout of the TPC have also been published.^[13]

The pre-Conceptual Design Report (pCDR) for nEXO was published in 2018. The planned location isSNOLAB,Canada.

References

^See P. Vogel, A. Piepke (2007). "Neutrinoless Double-beta decay",inW.-M. Yaoet al.(Particle Data Group) (2006). "Review of Particle Physics".Journal of Physics G.33(1): 1–1232.arXiv:astro-ph/0601168.Bibcode:2006JPhG...33....1Y.doi:10.1088/0954-3899/33/1/001.
^D. Leonard (2008). "Systematic study of trace radioactive impurities in candidate construction materials for EXO-200".Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A.591(3): 490–509.arXiv:0709.4524.Bibcode:2008NIMPA.591..490L.doi:10.1016/j.nima.2008.03.001.S2CID 118334959.
^"EXO project equipment successfully placed underground at WIPP"(PDF)(Press release).DOENews.24 July 2007.
^^a ^bAlbert, J. B.; Auty, D. J.; Barbeau, P. S.; Beauchamp, E.; Beck, D.; Belov, V.; Benitez-Medina, C.; Bonatt, J.; Breidenbach, M.; Brunner, T.; Burenkov, A.; Cao, G. F.; Chambers, C.; Chaves, J.; Cleveland, B.; Coon, M.; Craycraft, A.; Daniels, T.; Danilov, M.; Daugherty, S. J.; Davis, C. G.; Davis, J.; Devoe, R.; Delaquis, S.; Didberidze, T.; Dolgolenko, A.; Dolinski, M. J.; Dunford, M.; Fairbank Jr, W.; et al. (12 June 2014). "Search for Majorana neutrinos with the first two years of EXO-200 data".Nature.510(7504): 229–234.arXiv:1402.6956.Bibcode:2014Natur.510..229T.doi:10.1038/nature13432.PMID 24896189.S2CID 2740003.
^N. Ackerman; et al. (2011). "Observation of Two-Neutrino Double-Beta Decay in¹³⁶Xe with EXO-200 ".Physical Review Letters.107(21): 212501.arXiv:1108.4193.Bibcode:2011PhRvL.107u2501A.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.212501.PMID 22181874.S2CID 40334443.
^Albert, J. B.; Auger, M.; Auty, D. J.; Barbeau, P. S.; Beauchamp, E.; Beck, D.; Belov, V.; Benitez-Medina, C.; Bonatt, J.; Breidenbach, M.; Brunner, T.; Burenkov, A.; Cao, G. F.; Chambers, C.; Chaves, J.; Cleveland, B.; Cook, S.; Craycraft, A.; Daniels, T.; Danilov, M.; Daugherty, S. J.; Davis, C. G.; Davis, J.; Devoe, R.; Delaquis, S.; Dobi, A.; Dolgolenko, A.; Dolinski, M. J.; Dunford, M.; et al. (2014). "An improved measurement of the 2νββ half-life of Xe-136 with EXO-200".Phys. Rev. C.89(1): 015502.arXiv:1306.6106.Bibcode:2014PhRvC..89a5502A.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.89.015502.
^M. Auger; et al. (2012). "Search for Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay in¹³⁶Xe with EXO-200 ".Physical Review Letters.109(3): 032505.arXiv:1205.5608.Bibcode:2012PhRvL.109c2505A.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.032505.PMID 22861843.S2CID 29698686.
^Anton, G.; et al. (18 October 2019). "Search for Neutrinoless Double-$\ensuremath{\beta}$ Decay with the Complete EXO-200 Dataset".Physical Review Letters.123(16): 161802.arXiv:1906.02723.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.161802.PMID 31702371.S2CID 174803277.
^P. Fierlinger; et al. (2008). "A microfabricated sensor for thin dielectric layers".Review of Scientific Instruments.79(4): 045101–045101–7.arXiv:0706.0540.Bibcode:2008RScI...79d5101F.doi:10.1063/1.2906402.PMID 18447546.S2CID 2950473.
^Yang, Liang (8 July 2016).Status and Prospects for the EXO-200 and nEXO Experiments(PDF).XXVII International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics(presentation). London. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 17 November 2016.Retrieved16 November2016.Video available atNeutrino Conference 2016 - Friday (part 1)onYouTube.
^MacLellan, Ryan (25 September 2017).nEXO: a tonne-scale next-generation double-beta decay experiment.XV International Conference on Topics in Astroparticle and Underground Physics (TAUP 2017)(presentation).Sudbury,Canada.
^Albert, J. B.; et al. (nEXO Collaboration) (2018). "Sensitivity and Discovery Potential of nEXO to Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay".Physical Review C.97(6): 065503.arXiv:1710.05075.Bibcode:2018PhRvC..97f5503A.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.97.065503.S2CID 67854591.LLNL-JRNL-737682
^Jewell, M.; et al. (nEXO Collaboration) (14 October 2017). "Characterization of an Ionization Readout Tile for nEXO".Journal of Instrumentation.13:P01006.arXiv:1710.05109.doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/01/P01006.S2CID 56297955.

External links

[1] See P. Vogel, A. Piepke (2007). "Neutrinoless Double-beta decay",inW.-M. Yaoet al.(Particle Data Group) (2006). "Review of Particle Physics".Journal of Physics G.33(1): 1–1232.arXiv:astro-ph/0601168.Bibcode:2006JPhG...33....1Y.doi:10.1088/0954-3899/33/1/001.

[2] D. Leonard (2008). "Systematic study of trace radioactive impurities in candidate construction materials for EXO-200".Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A.591(3): 490–509.arXiv:0709.4524.Bibcode:2008NIMPA.591..490L.doi:10.1016/j.nima.2008.03.001.S2CID 118334959.

[3] "EXO project equipment successfully placed underground at WIPP"(PDF)(Press release).DOENews.24 July 2007.

[:0-4] Albert, J. B.; Auty, D. J.; Barbeau, P. S.; Beauchamp, E.; Beck, D.; Belov, V.; Benitez-Medina, C.; Bonatt, J.; Breidenbach, M.; Brunner, T.; Burenkov, A.; Cao, G. F.; Chambers, C.; Chaves, J.; Cleveland, B.; Coon, M.; Craycraft, A.; Daniels, T.; Danilov, M.; Daugherty, S. J.; Davis, C. G.; Davis, J.; Devoe, R.; Delaquis, S.; Didberidze, T.; Dolgolenko, A.; Dolinski, M. J.; Dunford, M.; Fairbank Jr, W.; et al. (12 June 2014). "Search for Majorana neutrinos with the first two years of EXO-200 data".Nature.510(7504): 229–234.arXiv:1402.6956.Bibcode:2014Natur.510..229T.doi:10.1038/nature13432.PMID 24896189.S2CID 2740003.

[Ackerman-5] N. Ackerman; et al. (2011). "Observation of Two-Neutrino Double-Beta Decay in¹³⁶Xe with EXO-200 ".Physical Review Letters.107(21): 212501.arXiv:1108.4193.Bibcode:2011PhRvL.107u2501A.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.212501.PMID 22181874.S2CID 40334443.

[6] Albert, J. B.; Auger, M.; Auty, D. J.; Barbeau, P. S.; Beauchamp, E.; Beck, D.; Belov, V.; Benitez-Medina, C.; Bonatt, J.; Breidenbach, M.; Brunner, T.; Burenkov, A.; Cao, G. F.; Chambers, C.; Chaves, J.; Cleveland, B.; Cook, S.; Craycraft, A.; Daniels, T.; Danilov, M.; Daugherty, S. J.; Davis, C. G.; Davis, J.; Devoe, R.; Delaquis, S.; Dobi, A.; Dolgolenko, A.; Dolinski, M. J.; Dunford, M.; et al. (2014). "An improved measurement of the 2νββ half-life of Xe-136 with EXO-200".Phys. Rev. C.89(1): 015502.arXiv:1306.6106.Bibcode:2014PhRvC..89a5502A.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.89.015502.

[7] M. Auger; et al. (2012). "Search for Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay in¹³⁶Xe with EXO-200 ".Physical Review Letters.109(3): 032505.arXiv:1205.5608.Bibcode:2012PhRvL.109c2505A.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.032505.PMID 22861843.S2CID 29698686.

[8] Anton, G.; et al. (18 October 2019). "Search for Neutrinoless Double-$\ensuremath{\beta}$ Decay with the Complete EXO-200 Dataset".Physical Review Letters.123(16): 161802.arXiv:1906.02723.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.161802.PMID 31702371.S2CID 174803277.

[9] P. Fierlinger; et al. (2008). "A microfabricated sensor for thin dielectric layers".Review of Scientific Instruments.79(4): 045101–045101–7.arXiv:0706.0540.Bibcode:2008RScI...79d5101F.doi:10.1063/1.2906402.PMID 18447546.S2CID 2950473.

[10] Yang, Liang (8 July 2016).Status and Prospects for the EXO-200 and nEXO Experiments(PDF).XXVII International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics(presentation). London. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 17 November 2016.Retrieved16 November2016.Video available atNeutrino Conference 2016 - Friday (part 1)onYouTube.

[11] MacLellan, Ryan (25 September 2017).nEXO: a tonne-scale next-generation double-beta decay experiment.XV International Conference on Topics in Astroparticle and Underground Physics (TAUP 2017)(presentation).Sudbury,Canada.

[12] Albert, J. B.; et al. (nEXO Collaboration) (2018). "Sensitivity and Discovery Potential of nEXO to Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay".Physical Review C.97(6): 065503.arXiv:1710.05075.Bibcode:2018PhRvC..97f5503A.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.97.065503.S2CID 67854591.LLNL-JRNL-737682

[13] Jewell, M.; et al. (nEXO Collaboration) (14 October 2017). "Characterization of an Ionization Readout Tile for nEXO".Journal of Instrumentation.13:P01006.arXiv:1710.05109.doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/01/P01006.S2CID 56297955.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]