Jump to content

Falaise pocket

Coordinates:48°53′34″N0°11′31″W/ 48.89278°N 0.19194°W/48.89278; -0.19194
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromFalaise Pocket)

Battle of the Falaise pocket
Part of theNormandy Campaign

Map showing the course of the battle from 8–17 August 1944
Date12–21 August 1944
Location
Normandy,France
48°53′34″N0°11′31″W/ 48.89278°N 0.19194°W/48.89278; -0.19194
Result

Allied victory[1]

Belligerents
United States
United Kingdom
Canada
PolandPoland
FranceFrance
Germany
Commanders and leaders
United KingdomBernard Montgomery
United StatesOmar Bradley
CanadaHarry Crerar
United KingdomMiles Dempsey
United StatesCourtney Hodges
United StatesGeorge S. Patton
New ZealandMary Coningham
Nazi GermanyGünther von Kluge
Nazi GermanyWalter Model
Nazi GermanyPaul Hausser
Nazi GermanyHeinrich Eberbach
Units involved
United States1st Army
United States3rd Army
Canada1st Army
United Kingdom2nd Army
United Kingdom2nd Tactical Air Force
Nazi Germany5th Panzer Army
Nazi Germany7th Army
Nazi GermanyPanzergruppe Eberbach
Strength
Up to 17 divisions 14–15 divisions
Casualties and losses
United States:
Unknown
United Kingdom:
Unknown
Free French:
Unknown
Canada:
5,679 casualties[nb 1]
Poland:
est. 5,150 casualties in total[3]
of which 2,300 for the 1st Armoured Division.[4]

est. 60,000:

  • est. 10,000 killed
  • est. 50,000 captured
500 tanks/assault guns

TheFalaise pocketorBattle of the Falaise pocket(German:Kesselvon Falaise;12–21 August 1944) was the decisive engagement of theBattle of Normandyin theSecond World War.Allied forces formed apocketaroundFalaise, Calvados,in which GermanArmy Group B,consisting of the7th Armyand theFifth Panzer Army(formerlyPanzergruppe West), were encircled by theWestern Allies.The battle resulted in the destruction of most of Army Group B west of theSeine,which opened the way to Paris and theFranco-German border.

Six weeks after the 6 June 1944 Alliedinvasion of Normandy,German forces were in turmoil, having expended irreplaceable resources defending the frontline and with Allied air superiority threatening the availability of food and ammunition. However, on the Allied side, British forces had expected to liberateCaenimmediately after the invasion, an operation which ended up taking nearly two months, and US forces had expected to controlSaint-Lôby the 7 June, yet German resistance delayed this until after Caen's liberation.

The Allied armies developed a multi-stage operation, beginning withOperation Goodwoodon 18 July, and continuing withOperation Cobraon 25 July, which saw American forces pushing into a gap around Saint-Lô in and overwhelming the defending German forces. On 1 August, Lieutenant GeneralGeorge S. Pattonwas named the commanding officer of the newly recommissionedUS Third Army,which included large segments of the force that had broken through the German lines. The Third Army quickly pushed south and then east, meeting little resistance. Concurrently, the British/Canadian troops pushed south inOperation Bluecoat,attempting to keep the German armour engaged. Four depletedpanzer divisionswere insufficient to defeat theFirst US Army,driving the Germans deeper into the Allied envelopment.

On 8 August, Allied ground forces commander GeneralBernard Montgomeryordered the Allied armies to converge on the Falaise–Chambois area to envelop Army Group B, with the First US Army forming the southern arm, the British the base, and the Canadians the northern arm of the encirclement. The Germans began to withdraw on 17 August, and on 19 August the Allies linked up in Chambois. German counter-attacks forced gaps in the Allied lines, the most significant of which was a corridor forced past the1st Polish Armoured DivisiononHill 262,a commanding position at the pocket mouth. By the evening of 21 August, the pocket had been sealed, with an estimated 50,000 Germans trapped inside. Approximately 20–50,000 German troops managed to escape the pocket before it was closed. The AlliedLiberation of Pariscame a few days later, and on 30 August the remnants of Army Group B retreated across the Seine, completing Operation Overlord.

Background[edit]

Operation Overlord[edit]

Early Allied objectives in the wake of the D-Day invasion ofGerman-occupied Franceincluded thedeep water portofCherbourgand the area surrounding the town ofCaen.[5]Allied attacks to expand the bridgehead had rapidly defeated the initial German attempts to destroy the invasion force, but bad weather[nb 2]in theEnglish Channeldelayed the Allied build-up of supplies and reinforcements, while enabling the Germans to move troops and supplies with less interference from the Allied air forces.[6][7]Cherbourg was not captured by theVII US Corpsuntil 27 June, and the German defence of Caen lasted until 20 July, when the southern districts were taken by the British/Canadians inOperation GoodwoodandOperation Atlantic.[8][9]

GeneralBernard Montgomery,the Allied ground forces commander, had planned a strategy of attracting German forces to the east end of the bridgehead against the British/Canadians, while theUS First Armyadvanced down the west side of theCotentin PeninsulatoAvranches.[10]On 25 July the US First Army commander, Lieutenant-GeneralOmar Bradley,beganOperation Cobra.[11]The US First Army broke through the German defences nearSaint-Lôand by the end of the third day had advanced 15 mi (24 km) south of its start line at several points.[12][13]Avranches was captured on 30 July and within 24 hours theUS VIII Corpsof the US Third Army crossed the bridge atPontaubaultinto Brittany and continued south and west through open country, almost without opposition.[14][15][16]

Operation Lüttich[edit]

The US advance was swift and by 8 August,Le Mans,the former headquarters of the German7th Army,had been captured.[17]After Operation Cobra,Operation BluecoatandOperation Spring,the German army in Normandy was so reduced that "only a fewSSfanatics still entertained hopes of avoiding defeat ".[18]On the Eastern Front, Operation Bagration had begun againstArmy Group Centrewhich left no possibility of reinforcement of the Western Front.[18]Adolf Hitlersent a directive to Field MarshalGünther von Kluge,the replacement commander ofArmy Group Bafter the sacking ofGerd von Rundstedt,ordering "an immediate counter-attack between Mortain and Avranches" to "annihilate" the enemy and make contact with the west coast of the Cotentin peninsula.[19][20]

Eight of the ninePanzer divisionsin Normandy were to be used in the attack, but only four could be made ready in time.[21]The German commanders protested that their forces were incapable of an offensive, but the warnings were ignored andOperation Lüttichcommenced on 7 August around Mortain.[20][22]The first attacks were made by the2nd Panzer Division,SS Division Leibstandarteand theSS Division Das Reich,but they had only 75Panzer IVs,70Panthersand 32self-propelled guns.[23]The Allies were forewarned byUltrasignals intercepts, and although the offensive continued until 13 August, the threat of Operation Lüttich had been ended within 24 hours.[24][25][26]Operation Lüttich had led to the most powerful remaining German units being defeated at the west side of the Cotentin Peninsula by the US First Army, and the Normandy front on the verge of collapse.[27][28]Bradley said,

This is an opportunity that comes to a commander not more than once in a century. We're about to destroy an entire hostile army and go all the way from here to the German border.[28]

Operation Totalize[edit]

ACromwell tankandWillys MB'jeep' passing an abandoned German8.8 cm PaK 43anti-tank gun during Totalize

TheFirst Canadian Armywas ordered to capture high ground north of Falaise to trap Army Group B.[29]The Canadians plannedOperation Totalize,with attacks by strategic bombers and a novel night attack usingKangarooarmoured personnel carriers.[30][31]Operation Totalize began on the night of 7/8 August; the leading infantry rode on the Kangaroos, guided by electronic aids and illuminants, against the12th SS Panzer Division Hitlerjugend,which held a 14 km (8.7 mi) front, supported by the101st SS Heavy Panzer Battalionand remnants of the89th Infantry Division.[30][32]Verrières RidgeandCintheauxwere captured on 9 August, but the speed of the advance was slowed by German resistance and some poor Canadian unit leadership, which led to many casualties in the4th Canadian (Armoured) Divisionand1st Polish Armoured Division.[33][34][35]By 10 August, Anglo-Canadian forces had reached Hill 195, north of Falaise.[35]The following day, Canadian commanderGuy Simondsrelieved the armoured divisions with infantry divisions, ending the offensive.[36]

Allied plan[edit]

Still expecting Kluge to withdraw his forces from the tightening Allied noose, Montgomery had for some time been planning a "longenvelopment",by which the British/Canadians would pivot left from Falaise toward the River Seine while the US Third Army blocked the escape route between the Seine and theLoire,trapping all surviving German forces in western France.[37][nb 3]In a telephone conversation on 8 August, theSupreme Allied Commander,GeneralDwight D. Eisenhower,recommended an American proposal for a shorter envelopment atArgentan.Montgomery and Patton had misgivings; if the Allies did not take Argentan,Alençonand Falaise quickly, many Germans might escape. Believing he could always fall back on the original plan if necessary, Montgomery accepted the wishes of Bradley as the man on the spot, and the proposal was adopted.[37]

Battle[edit]

It is also referred to as the battle of theFalaise gap(after the corridor which the Germans sought to maintain to allow their escape).[nb 4]

Operation Tractable[edit]

The formation of the Falaise pocket, from 8–17 August 1944[image reference needed]

The Third Army advance from the south made good progress on 12 August; Alençon was captured and Kluge was forced to commit troops he had been gathering for a counter-attack. The next day, theUS 5th Armored Divisionof theUS XV Corpsadvanced 35 mi (56 km) and reached positions overlooking Argentan.[41]On 13 August, Bradley over-ruled orders by Patton for a further push northwards towards Falaise by the 5th Armored Division.[41]Bradley instead ordered the XV Corps to "concentrate for operations in another direction".[42]The US troops near Argentan were ordered to withdraw, which ended the pincer movement by the XV Corps.[43]Patton objected but complied, which left an exit for the German forces in the Falaise pocket.[43][nb 5]

With the Americans on the southern flank halted and then engaged withPanzer Group Eberbach,and with the British pressing in from the north-west, the First Canadian Army, which included thePolish 1st Armoured Division,was ordered to close the trap.[45]After a limited attack by the2nd Canadian Infantry Divisiondown theLaizevalley on 12–13 August, most of the time since Totalize had been spent preparing forOperation Tractable,a set-piece attack on Falaise.[34]The operation commenced on 14 August at 11:42, covered by an artillerysmokescreenthat mimicked the night attack of Operation Totalize.[34][46]The 4th Canadian Armoured Division and the 1st Polish Armoured Division crossed the Laison, but delays at the RiverDivesgave time for the Tiger tanks of theschwere SS-Panzer Abteilung 102to counter-attack.[46]

Navigating through the smoke slowed progress, and the mistaken use by the First Canadian Army of yellow smoke to identify their positions—the same colour strategic bombers used to mark targets—led to some bombing of the Canadians and slower progress than planned.[47][48]On 15 August, the 2nd and3rd Canadian Infantry Divisionsand the2nd Canadian (Armoured) Brigadecontinued the offensive, but progress remained slow.[48][49]The 4th Armoured Division capturedSoulangyagainst determined German resistance and several German counter-attacks, which prevented a breakthrough toTrun.[50]The next day, the 2nd Canadian Infantry Division entered Falaise against minor opposition fromWaffen SSunits and scattered pockets of German infantry, and by 17 August had secured the town.[51]

At midday on 16 August, Kluge had refused an order from Hitler for another counter-attack, and in the afternoon Hitler agreed to a withdrawal but became suspicious that Kluge intended to surrender to the Allies.[48][52]Late on 17 August, Hitler sacked Kluge and recalled him to Germany; Kluge then killed himself with potassium cyanide, fearing his involvement in the20 July plot.[53][54]Kluge was succeeded by Field MarshalWalter Model,whose first act was to order the immediate retreat of the 7th Army and Fifth Panzer Army, while theII SS Panzer Corps—with the remnants of four Panzer divisions—held the north face of the escape route against the British/Canadians, and theXLVII Panzer Corps—with what was left of two Panzer divisions—held the southern face against the Third US Army.[53]

Throughout the retreat, German columns were constantly harried by Alliedfighter bombersof the USNinth Air Forceand theRAF Second Tactical Air Force,using bombs, rockets and guns, turning the escape routes into killing grounds.[55]Despite claims of large numbers of tanks and other vehicles destroyed from the air, a post-battle investigation showed that only eleven armoured vehicles could be proved to have had been destroyed by aircraft, although about one third of wrecked trucks were lost to air attack and many others had been destroyed or abandoned by their crews, probably due to the air threat.[56]

Encirclement[edit]

German counter-attacks against Canadian-Polish positions on 20 August 1944

On 17 August the encirclement was still incomplete.[53]The 1st Polish Armoured Division, part of the First Canadian Army, was divided into three battlegroups and ordered to make a wide sweep to the south-east to meet American troops at Chambois.[53]Trun fell to the 4th Canadian Armoured Division on 18 August.[57]Having capturedChampeauxon 19 August, the Polish battlegroups converged on Chambois, and with reinforcements from the 4th Canadian Armoured Division, the Poles secured the town and linked up with the US 90th and French2nd Armoureddivisions by evening.[58][59][60]The Allies were not yet astride the 7th Army escape route in any great strength, and their positions were attacked by German troops inside the pocket.[60]An armoured column of the 2nd Panzer Division broke through the Canadians inSt. Lambert,took half the village and kept a road open for six hours until nightfall.[58]Many Germans escaped, and small parties made their way through to the Dives during the night.[61]

Having taken Chambois, two of the Polish battlegroups drove north-east and established themselves on part ofHill 262(Mont Ormel ridge), spending the night of 19 August digging in.[62]The following morning, Model ordered elements of the 2nd SS Panzer Division and9th SS Panzer Divisionto attack from outside the pocket towards the Polish positions.[63]Around midday, several units of the10th SS Panzer Division,12th SS Panzer Division and116th Panzer Divisionmanaged to break through the Polish lines and open a corridor, while the 9th SS Panzer Division prevented the Canadians from intervening.[64]By mid-afternoon, about 10,000 German troops had passed out of the pocket.[65]

Polish infantry moving towards cover onHill 262,20 August 1944

The Poles held on to Hill 262 (The Mace), and were able from their vantage point to direct artillery fire on to the retreating Germans.[66]Paul Hausser,the 7th Army commander, ordered that the Polish positions be "eliminated".[65]The remnants of the352nd Infantry Divisionand several battle groups from the 2nd SS Panzer Division inflicted many casualties on the 8th and 9th battalions of the Polish Division, but the assault was eventually repulsed at the cost of nearly all of their ammunition, and the Poles watched as the remnants of the XLVII Panzer Corps escaped. During the night there was sporadic fighting, and the Poles called for frequent artillery bombardments to disrupt the German retreat from the sector.[66]

Germans surrendering in St. Lambert on 19 August 1944

German attacks resumed the next morning, but the Poles retained their foothold on the ridge. At about 11:00, a final attempt on the positions of the 9th Battalion was launched by nearby SS troops, which was defeated at close quarters.[67]Soon after midday, theCanadian Grenadier Guardsreached Mont Ormel, and by late afternoon the remainder of the 2nd and 9th SS Panzer Divisions had begun their retreat to the Seine.[50][68]For the Falaise pocket operation, the 1st Polish Armoured Division listed 1,441 casualties including 466 killed,[69]while Polish casualties at Mont Ormel were 351 killed and wounded, with eleven tanks lost.[67]German losses in their assaults on the ridge were estimated at 500 killed and 1,000 men taken prisoner, most from the 12th SS-Panzer Division. Scores ofTiger,Panther and Panzer IV tanks were destroyed, along with many artillery pieces.[67]

By the evening of 21 August, tanks of the 4th Canadian Armoured Division had linked with Polish forces atCoudehard,and the 2nd and 3rd Canadian Infantry divisions had secured St. Lambert and the northern passage to Chambois; the Falaise pocket had been sealed.[70]Approximately 20–50,000 German troops, minus heavy equipment, escaped through the gap and were reorganized and rearmed, in time to slow the Allied advance into Eastern France, the Netherlands, Belgium and Germany.[43]

Aftermath[edit]

Analysis[edit]

German prisoners taken during the battle are given tea by their British captors.

The battle of the Falaise pocket ended the Battle of Normandy with a decisive German defeat.[1]Hitler's involvement had been damaging from the first day, with his insistence on unrealistic counter-offensives,micro-managementof generals, and refusal to withdraw when his armies were threatened with annihilation.[71]More than forty German divisions were destroyed during the Battle of Normandy. No exact figures are available, but historians estimate the battle cost the Germans 450,000 men, including240,000 werekilled or wounded.[71]The Allies had209,672 casualtiesamong their ground forces, including36,976 killedand19,221 missing.[70]The Allied air forces lost16,714 airmenkilled or missing in connection with Operation Overlord.[72]The final battle of Operation Overlord, theLiberation of Paris,followed on 25 August, and Overlord ended by 30 August with the retreat of the last German unit across the Seine.[73]

The pocket area was full of the remains of battle.[74]Villages had been destroyed, and derelict equipment made some roads impassable. Corpses of soldiers and civilians littered the area, along with thousands of dead cattle and horses.[75]In the hot August weather, maggots crawled over the bodies, and swarms of flies descended on the area.[75][76]Pilots reported the smell from hundreds of feet (metres) in the air.[75]General Eisenhower recorded that:

The battlefield at Falaise was unquestionably one of the greatest "killing fields" of any of the war areas. Forty-eight hours after the closing of the gap I was conducted through it on foot, to encounter scenes that could be described only byDante.It was literally possible to walk for hundreds of yards at a time, stepping on nothing but dead and decaying flesh.[77]

— Dwight Eisenhower
Wrecked vehicles and bodies of retreating Germans nearChamboisin the Falaise gap, after an attack by RAFHawker Typhoonfighter bombers.

Fear of infection from the rancid conditions led the Allies to declare the area an "unhealthy zone".[78]Clearing the area was a low priority though, and went on until well into November. Many swollen bodies had to be shot to expunge gases within them before they could be burnt, and bulldozers were used to clear the area of dead animals.[75][76]

Disappointed that a significant portion of the German army had escaped from the pocket, many Allied commanders, particularly among the Americans, were critical of what they perceived as Montgomery's lack of urgency in closing the pocket.[79]Writing shortly after the war,Ralph Ingersoll—a prominent peacetime journalist, who had served as a planner on Eisenhower's staff—expressed the prevailing American view at the time:

The international army boundary arbitrarily divided the British and American battlefields just beyond Argentan, on the Falaise side of it. Patton's troops, who thought they had the mission of closing the gap, took Argentan in their stride and crossed the international boundary without stopping. Montgomery, who was still nominally in charge of all ground forces, now chose to exercise his authority and ordered Patton back to his side of the international boundary line. For ten days, however, the beaten but still coherently organized German Army retreated through the Falaise gap.[80]

— Ralph Ingersoll

Some historians have thought that the gap could have been closed earlier;Wilmotwrote that despite having British divisions in reserve, Montgomery did not reinforce Guy Simonds and that the Canadian drive on Trun and Chambois was not as "vigorous and venturesome" as the situation demanded.[79]The British author and historianMax Hastingswrote that Montgomery, having witnessed what he called a poor Canadian performance during Totalize, should have brought up veteran British divisions to take the lead.[37]D'EsteandBlumensonwrote that Montgomery andHarry Crerarmight have done more to impart momentum to the British/Canadians. Patton's post-battle claim that the Americans could have prevented the German escape, had Bradley not ordered him to stop at Argentan, was "absurd over-simplification".[81]

General Eisenhowerreviewing damage (including a wreckedTiger IItank) in the pocket at Chambois

Wilmot wrote that "contrary to contemporary reports, the Americans did not capture Argentan until 20 August, the day after the link up at Chambois".[82]The American unit that closed the gap between Argentan and Chambois, the90th Division,was according to Hastings one of the least effective of any Allied army in Normandy. He speculated that the real reason Bradley halted Patton was not fear of accidental clashes with the British, but knowledge that, with powerful German formations still operational, the Americans lacked the means to defend an early blocking position and would have suffered an "embarrassing and gratuitous setback" at the hands of the retreatingFallschirmjägerand the 2nd and 12thSS-Panzerdivisions.[81]Bradley wrote after the war that:

Although Patton might have spun a line across the narrow neck, I doubted his ability to hold it. Nineteen German divisions were now stampeding to escape the trap. Meanwhile, with four divisions George was already blocking three principal escape routes through Alencon, Sees and Argentan. Had he stretched that line to include Falaise, he would have extended his roadblock a distance of 40 miles (64 km). The enemy could not only have broken through, but he might have trampled Patton's position in the onrush. I much preferred a solid shoulder at Argentan to the possibility of a broken neck at Falaise.[83]

— Omar Bradley

Casualties[edit]

By 22 August, all German soldiers west of the Allied lines were dead or in captivity.[84]Historians differ in their estimates of German losses in the pocket. The majority state that from 80,000 to 100,000 troops were caught in the encirclement, of whom10,000–15,000 werekilled,40,000–50,000 weretaken prisoner, and20,000–50,000 escaped.Shulman,Wilmot andEllisestimated that the remnants of14–15 divisionswere in the pocket. D'Este gave a figure of80,000 troopstrapped, of whom10,000 were killed,50,000 capturedand20,000 escaped.[85]Shulman givesest. 80,000 trapped,10–15,000 killedand45,000 captured.[86]Wilmot recorded100,000 trapped,10,000 killedand50,000 captured.[87]Williamswrote thatest. 100,000 Germantroops escaped.[1]Tamelander estimated that50,000 Germantroops were caught, of whom10,000 werekilled and40,000 takenprisoner, while perhaps another50,000 escaped.[88]In the northern sector, German losses included344 tanks,self-propelled guns and other light armoured vehicles, as wellas 2,447soft-skinned vehiclesand252 gunsabandoned or destroyed.[70][89]In the fighting around Hill 262, German losses totalled2,000 menkilled,5,000 takenprisoner and55 tanks,44 gunsand152 otherarmoured vehicles destroyed.[90]By 22 August 1944, the 12th SS-Panzer Division "Hitlerjugend" had lost around 8,000 soldiers,[91]out of its initial strength of 20,540,[92]along with most of its tanks and vehicles, which had been redistributed among several Kampfgruppe in the previous weeks. Elements of several German formations had managed to escape to the east, but they left behind most of their equipment.[93]After the battle, Allied investigators estimated that the Germans lost around500 tanksand assault guns in the pocket, and that little equipment was taken across the Seine.[79]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

Footnotes[edit]

  1. ^From 8 until 21 August: 1,479 killed or died of wounds, 4,023 wounded or injured, and 177 captured.[2]
  2. ^TheMulberry harboursbuilt off the landing beaches were damaged in a storm on 19 June
  3. ^Divisions around the Falaise Pocket on 16 August 1944:First Canadian Army,1st Polish Armoured Division,2nd Canadian Infantry Division,3rd Canadian Infantry Division,4th Canadian Armoured Division;Second British Army:3rd Infantry Division,11th Armoured Division,43rd (Wessex) Infantry Division,50th (Northumbrian) Infantry Division,53rd (Welsh) Infantry Division,59th (Staffordshire) Infantry Division;First United States Army:US 1st Infantry Division,US 3rd Armored Division,US 9th Infantry Division,US 28th Infantry Division,US 30th Infantry Division;Third United States Army:French 2nd Armoured Division,90th Infantry Division.[38]
  4. ^The engagement is also sometimes referred to as the Chambois pocket, the Falaise–Chambois pocket, the Argentan–Falaise pocket,[39]or the Trun-Chambois gap.[40]
  5. ^Bradley later received much blame for "failing" to exploit the opportunity to envelop Army Group B.[41]GeneralHans Speidel,Chief of Staff of Army Group B, wrote that they would have been eliminated, if the 5th Armored Division had continued its advance to Falaise, althoughD'Estewrote that the order came from Montgomery.[43][44]

Citations[edit]

  1. ^abcWilliams, p. 204
  2. ^Stacey, p. 271
  3. ^"World War II: Closing the Falaise Pocket".History Net.12 June 2006.Retrieved12 August2017.
  4. ^"The Canadians in the Falaise Pocket".Info-Poland.Archived fromthe originalon 2 July 2010.
  5. ^Van der Vat, p. 110
  6. ^Williams, p. 114
  7. ^Griess, pp. 308–310
  8. ^Hastings, p. 165
  9. ^Trew, p. 48
  10. ^Hart, p. 38.
  11. ^Wilmot, pp. 390–392
  12. ^Hastings, p. 257.
  13. ^Wilmot, p. 393.
  14. ^Williams, p. 185
  15. ^Wilmot, p. 394
  16. ^Hastings, p. 280
  17. ^Williams, p. 194
  18. ^abHastings, p. 277
  19. ^D'Este, p. 414
  20. ^abWilliams, p. 196
  21. ^Wilmot, p. 401
  22. ^Hastings, p. 283
  23. ^Hastings, p. 285
  24. ^Messenger, pp. 213–217
  25. ^Bennett 1979, pp. 112–119
  26. ^Hastings, p. 286
  27. ^Hastings, p. 335
  28. ^abWilliams, p. 197
  29. ^D'Este, p. 404
  30. ^abHastings, p. 296
  31. ^Zuehlke, p. 168
  32. ^Williams, p. 198
  33. ^Hastings, p. 299
  34. ^abcHastings, p. 301
  35. ^abBercuson, p. 230
  36. ^Hastings, p. 300
  37. ^abcHastings, p. 353.
  38. ^Copp (2003), p. 234.
  39. ^Keegan, p. 136
  40. ^Ellis, p. 448
  41. ^abcWilmot, p. 417
  42. ^Essame, p. 168
  43. ^abcdEssame, p. 182
  44. ^D'Este, p. 441
  45. ^Wilmot, p. 419
  46. ^abBercuson, p. 231
  47. ^Hastings, p. 354
  48. ^abcHastings, p. 302
  49. ^Van Der Vat, p. 169
  50. ^abBercuson, p. 232
  51. ^Copp (2006), p. 104
  52. ^Wilmot, p. 420
  53. ^abcdHastings, p. 303
  54. ^Moczarski, 1981, pp. 226–234
  55. ^Trigg 2020, p. 262
  56. ^Trigg 2020, p. 289-290
  57. ^Zuehlke, p. 169
  58. ^abWilmot, p. 422
  59. ^Jarymowycz, p. 192
  60. ^abHastings, p. 304
  61. ^Wilmot, p.423
  62. ^D'Este, p. 456
  63. ^Jarymowycz, p. 195
  64. ^Jarymowycz, p. 196
  65. ^abVan Der Vat, p. 168
  66. ^abD'Este, p. 458
  67. ^abcMcGilvray, p. 54
  68. ^Bercuson, p. 233
  69. ^Copp (2003), p. 249
  70. ^abcHastings, p. 313
  71. ^abWilliams, p. 205
  72. ^Tamelander, Zetterling, p. 341.
  73. ^Hastings, p. 319
  74. ^Hastings, p. 311
  75. ^abcdLucas & Barker, p. 158
  76. ^abHastings, p. 312
  77. ^Eisenhower 1948,p. 279
  78. ^Lucas & Barker, p. 159
  79. ^abcWilmot, p. 424
  80. ^Ingersoll 1946,pp. 190–191
  81. ^abHastings, p. 369
  82. ^Wilmot, p. 425
  83. ^Bradley, p. 377
  84. ^Hastings, p. 306
  85. ^D'Este, pp. 430–431
  86. ^Shulman, pp. 180, 184
  87. ^Wilmot, pp. 422, 424
  88. ^Tamelander, Zetterling, p. 342
  89. ^Reynolds, p. 88
  90. ^McGilvray, p. 55
  91. ^Zetterling, p. 316
  92. ^Zetterling, p. 311
  93. ^Hastings, p. 314

References[edit]

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]