Flor Contemplacion

In thisPhilippine nameformarried women,the birthmiddle nameor maternalfamily nameisunknown,the birth surname or paternal family name isRamos,and themarital nameisContemplacion.

Flor Contemplacion
Contemplacion after her arrest in 1991
Born	Flor Ramos Contemplacion 7 January 1953 San Pablo, Laguna,Philippines
Died	17 March 1995 (aged 42) Changi Prison,Singapore
Cause of death	Execution byhanging
Resting place	San Pablo Memorial Park San Pablo, Laguna,Philippines
Nationality	Philippines
Occupation	Domestic worker
Criminal status	Executed
Conviction(s)	Murder
Criminal penalty	Death
Details
Victims	2

Flor Ramos Contemplacion(7 January 1953 – 17 March 1995) was a Filipinadomestic workerwho wasexecutedin Singapore after being convicted ofmurderinga fellow Filipina maid and the three-year-old boy whom she was babysitting. At the time, her case as well as her eventual sentencing severely straineddiplomatic relationsbetween thePhilippinesandSingapore,although relations soon recovered.

Biography

Flor Contemplacion was born inSan Pablo Cityin theLaguna provinceofLuzon,and was the second youngest of ten children. Her father died when she was 7 years old, and due to the increased financial pressure on her rural family she moved toManilato live with an elder sister when she was 10 years old. Contemplacion dropped out of school aged 12 and soon after began working as ahousemaid.Contemplacion got married in 1972 when she was 19 years old and eventually had four children. Her husband walked out on the family in 1987, leaving Contemplacion as the sole breadwinner. In 1988, she travelled to Singapore in search of work to support her young family, eventually finding employment as a domestic servant in the Cardiff Road area ofSerangoon.Contemplacion often worked seven days a week from 6am until midnight, doing household chores and looking after her employer's child.

Background to arrest

On 4 May 1991, Delia Mamaril Maga(born on 6 October 1955, inTarlac), a 34-year-old Filipinodomestic worker,was foundstrangledto death in an apartment ofHDBBlock 147 on Gangsa Road inBukit Panjang.A three-year-old boy, Nicholas Huang, whom Maga had been taking care of, was discovered lying next to her having beendrownedin a bucket of water. The victims' bodies were discovered by Huang's parents, who had employed Maga for the previous 4 years, after they had arrived home to their apartment shortly after 1pm. Their two-year-old daughter was located unharmed in Maga's locked bedroom.

Singaporean policeinvestigating thecrime scenefound no signs of a struggle or anyransackingof the flat, which combined with the fact thefront door grillewas locked when the owners returned home suggested that Maga knew her killer and granted them entry to the apartment.Interviews with neighbor Lucrecia Galuga revealed that she last saw Maga and the two children alive at 10am, and Maga had mentioned that a friend was due to visit her later on that morning.

At around 7pm, police arrested 38-year-oldFilipinocitizen Flor Ramos Contemplacion at HDB Block 633 on Veerasamy Road inKallang.Contemplacion was found in possession of luxury items (seven watches, a camera and a pearl necklace) that were believed to have been stolen from Maga.Investigations revealed that Contemplacion had visited Maga at the apartment in Bukit Panjang several times before and had met Nicholas Huang on those occasions. This fact raised the possibility that Contemplacion killed Huang and Maga to prevent her being identified, however the life of the two-year-old girl was spared as she was unable to speak due to her young age.

During herinterrogationby the police, Contemplacion claimed to have left her employer's house on Cardiff Road the previous morning to deliver a package to her niece at Don Long Mansion inKatong,but she was not at home when Contemplacion arrived. However, when the police contacted the owner of the apartment to check Contemplacion'salibihe denied she had visited the property.

On the afternoon of 5 May 1991, Contemplacion finallyconfessedto killing both victims,and on 7 May 1991 she was charged with the double murder of Delia Mamaril Maga and Nicholas Huang and thenremanded in custody.

Trial

On 26 January 1993, Contemplacion's trial began in theHigh Court of Singaporebefore JusticeT. S. Sinnathuray.In her opening speech, DeputyPublic ProsecutorKamala Ponnampalam described how the victim's dead bodies were discovered by Huang's parents, who after failing toresuscitateNicholas then called the police. Investigating officers examined Maga's personaldiaryand discovered the name and address of Flor Contemplacion, who was then located and questioned.Testimony byforensic pathologistDoctor Wee Keng Poh revealed that Maga died fromasphyxiadue to strangulation and Huang's death had been caused by drowning. According to theexpert witness,another person had used anelastic cordwound around Maga's neck to apply moderate force for approximately 5 minutes, while the immersion of a young child's face in water for a similar time would cause them to drown.

Contemplacion's lawyer Ng Wing Cheong challenged theadmissibilityof five statementsshe gave to police after her arrest, asserting that they were madeunder duresswhile she was fatigued after hours of intensive questioning bydetectives.Duringcross examination,Contemplacion claimed police used a picture of theVirgin Maryto frighten her intoincriminating herself,as being aCatholicher belief was sinners would not go toHeaven.

Contemplacion also claimed she was not informed of herright to have a lawyerpresent prior to giving the statements, and that detectives shouted and screamed at her that she would behangedif she did not tell the truth. However, Contemplacion conceded to the prosecutor that all statements were made voluntarily without any threat, inducement or promise being made before or during the recording of the statements by theTagaloginterpreter (who was provided by the Philippine Embassy in Singapore) or herself.

DPP Ponnampalam countered there was no evidence theSpecial Investigations Sectionhad such a picture in their office, and that the police officers who interrogated Contemplacion confirmed that no pictures were shown to her during her questioning. Justice T.S Sinnathuray therefore ruled all five statements were given voluntarily and could be admitted as evidence.

The prosecution thereafter submitted as evidence the statements made by Contemplacion, where she described making friends with Maga in June 1990. On the morning of the murders, Contemplacion went to the apartment in Bukit Panjang to meet Maga, as she wanted to hand over a parcel that Maga would deliver to her parents during her upcoming holiday tothe Philippines.However, Maga refused to take the package with her, saying it was too heavy to bring on the airplane.While Contemplacion was talking to Maga, she suddenly had apsychotic episodewhere she broke out into a cold sweat and felt the urge to harm Maga. Contemplacion then strangled Maga from behind with an elastic cord and when she was dead dragged her body into a bathroom. There she discovered Nicholas playing with toys in a bucket of water, and Contemplacion grasped him by the upper body and dunked his head under the water until he stopped moving. Contemplacion then grabbed some of Maga's possessions and fled the apartment.

When called to give herdefence,Contemplacion opted toremain silent,and her lawyer decided not to call any witnesses or make any submissions on her behalf either. DPP Ponnampalam also declined to present any arguments due to the stance of the defence team.

Verdict

On 29 January 1993, Flor Contemplacion was found guilty as charged and sentenced to death for the murder of Delia Mamaril Maga and Nicholas Huang,in accordance with Section 302 of thePenal Code of Singapore.When the sentence was announced, Contemplacion broke down into tears and had to be supported by two prison officers as she was lead from the dock.

Appeals

On 26 January 1994, defence lawyer Sant Singh raised the defence ofdiminished responsibilityduring a hearing at theCourt of Appealin regards to Contemplacion's conviction, stating that the issue of her mental state was never raised during her original trial and newexculpatory evidencehad since come to light regarding her psychiatric condition during the murders. Anaffidavitcontaining observations fromGleneagles HospitalconsultantpsychiatristDoctor Terence Burke, who had studied the case in detail and since examined Contemplacion personally, was requested to be submitted by Singh. The appeal judges thereafter suspended the hearing and ordered that the original trial judge re-open the case and review the new evidence.

Retrial

On 25 April 1994, JusticeT. S. Sinnathurayheard arguments in the High Court regarding Contemplacion's appeal. Taking the stand to give evidence in her own defence, Contemplacion claimed to have suffered fromseizuresfrom an early age, which gave her bouts of headaches and uncontrollable shaking. She also claimed that on the day of the murders a mysterious "voice" instructed her to visit Maga at the Bukit Panjang apartment.Contemplacion testified that on the way to the apartment she began to feel strange and started trembling all over. When she got there Maga appeared to be half her normal size and then looked like she was "shrinking". Contemplacion suddenly realised she was gripping an elastic cord that was wrapped around Maga's neck and ran into the bathroom tovomit.There she saw a young boy playing with water and he looked "like a smallcat"to her. Contemplacion claimed she could not control herself, and she picked up the child then submerged his head in the bucket of water. Contemplacion asserted that she was suffering from severe psychiatric issues at the time of the killings, and was not guilty of murder but was admitting tomanslaughter.

Testimony from Doctor Terence Burke asserted that Contemplacion suffered from a form ofepilepsyknown as apartial complex seizure,which was amental illnessthat significantly impaired her responsibility for her actions on the day in question. Doctor Burke also testified that herlow IQand lack of education meant it was highly unlikely that Contemplacion would have been able to fabricate the symptoms of epilepsy.DeputyPublic ProsecutorP.S. Raj argued that Contemplacion was simply suffering from amigraineon the day of the murders, adding that she had been examined previously by the consultant psychiatrist of Changi Prison hospital, Doctor Chan Khim Yew, and was determined to have no abnormality of the mind that would impair her mental reasoning abilities.

DPP Raj also highlighted that Contemplacion had not mentionedhearing voicesor havinghallucinationsin any of her statements to the police after her arrest nor to Doctor Chan Khim Yew during his psychiatric examinations, having first reported these issues during interviews with Doctor Burke after her conviction and only submitting them in her defence during her retrial, which lead the court to consider her claims as fabrications and an exaggeration of a mild headache. DPP Raj further asserted that the evidence of Doctor Chan Khim Yew should take precedence over the testimony of Doctor Burke, as Contemplacion had first been examined by Doctor Chan Khim Yew a month after the murders and he had kept her under observation over 18 months throughout her detention inremand prison,whereas Doctor Burke had only had 4 interviews with her after she had been convicted. Doctor Chan Khim Yew also had years of previous experience on examining patients and then giving evidence on the issue ofdiminished responsibility,where as Doctor Burke had never testified on an case regarding diminished responsibility before, the DPP added.

After deliberation, the judge rejected Contemplacion's testimony and confirmed her earlier death sentence,ruling that she did not suffer from any serious mental illness at the time of the double homicide, that she only displayed symptoms of a mild migraine, and that she had consciously and deliberately murdered both victims.The court's judgement noted that the comprehensiveness of Contemplacion's actions in the apartment, such as using two different methods to silently kill each victim and locking the youngest child in a bedroom to prevent the sound of her crying alerting any bystanders, coupled with her ability to remember the events of that day in clear detail, proved that she was not suffering from a partial complex seizure during the time of the murders. The fact that both women had argued over the size of the package Maga refused to take with her to the Philippines on Contemplacion's behalf was attributed as a more likely motive for the fatal attack, according to the judge.

Justice T. S. Sinnathuray also highlighted that both Doctor Burke and Doctor Chan Khim Yew had agreed that a person suffering a partial complex seizure would have no recollection of the events that occurred during the episode, where as Contemplacion had given a vivid and detailed step by step account of what happened in Della's flat on the day of the murders, therefore her testimony satisfied him beyondreasonable doubtthat she did not suffer from partial complex seizure at that time. The judge likewise dismissed claims that Contemplacion was unintelligent, as having witnessed her nimble performance duringcross examinationover several days he considered her a wilful and cunning person.

Appeal of Conviction

On 19 September 1994, Contemplacion's appeal against her conviction was rejected by Singapore'sCourt of Criminal Appeal.Defence lawyer Sant Singh argued that while the circumstances of the double murder she was convicted of were not in dispute, the original trial judge had erred in ruling the symptoms described by Contemplacion as a mild migraine rather than temporal lobe epilepsy, which was a core element in her pleading guilty by diminished responsibility. Although Doctor Chan Khim Yew had previously raised the fact that Contemplacion had not exhibited any unusual behaviour to her employers during the 3 years she worked for them, the defence asserted that they would only be able to observe her during evenings and weekends and therefore never had the chance to properly scrutinize her psychological condition. Defence lawyers also stated that Doctor Chan Khim Yew's observations were irrelevant to Contemplacion's mental state on the day of the murders as they took place after the fact.

The Appeal Court judges rejected all defence arguments, highlighting how Doctor Chan Khim Yew had observed Contemplacion's behaviour over 18 months while she was on remand and had ample time to diagnose any psychiatric issues. The court also gave credence to her faultless work history as evidence she was not suffering from any serious illness, as she was trusted to look after young children while living in the same house as her employers, who would have easily spotted Contemplacion having epileptic fits on a near monthly basis as she claimed. The original trial judge was also deemed to have correctly considered the calculated shrewdness of Contemplacion's actions inside the flat on the day of the murders as evidence of a lack of mental abnormality on her part, as well as her alert and quick thinking performance while under cross examination being proof she was in fact a cunning and intelligent person.

"I know I lost everything in my life in my heart. I think why I did this stupid thing, each and every day I ask myself."

Excerpt of letter sent by Flor Contemplacion to her sister in law while she was on death row (17 February 1994)

President Ramos intervention

Philippines PresidentFidel V. Ramoswrote to Singapore PresidentOng Teng Cheongtwice, once to grant clemency to Contemplacion and the other to delay execution to evaluate purported new evidence which had surfaced.

Allegations against Huang's father

In the days leading up to the scheduled execution, Filipina maid Emilia Frenilla, who had previously worked for Huang's uncle, submitted a sworn statement to the Singaporean Embassy inManila,claiming:

• Nicholas Huang suffered fromepilepsy
• Delia Maga was murdered by Huang's father in a fit of rage when he discovered Huang had accidentally drowned after having a seizure and falling into a bucket of water
• Frenilla overheard Huang's father and uncle discussing how he framed Contemplacion for the deaths
• Huang's father and uncle spoke in a mixture ofMalayand English, languages Frenilla was fluent in after previously working inKota Kinabalu

However, after an investigation Singaporean authorities disregarded the new evidence, citing factual errors such as:

• Nicholas Huang's family doctor confirmed the boy had never been diagnosed with epilepsy
• Huang's father did not name Contemplacion in any statements he made to the police and she was only identified as a suspect after the police themselves had found her details in Maga's personal diary
• Huang's father and uncle do not speak Malay, and only converse with each other in Chinese (Hakkaand/orMandarin)

Also, the fact that after her arrest Contemplacion revealed to police the location of luxury items she had stolen from Maga provided strongcircumstantial evidencethat she was linked to the murders.

Allegations of mistreatment while in custody

Shortly aftermidnighton the morning of the scheduled execution, Filipina citizen Virginia Custodio Parumog, who in 1992 had shared aprison cellwith Contemplacion inChangi Prisonwhile serving acustodial sentenceforprostitution,returned to Singapore via commercial airlineand then attempted to submit anaffidavitto Singaporean authorities containing claims such as:

• Contemplacion had told her that when she arrived at the apartment in Bukit Panjang for a visit Nicolas was already dead, Maga then phoned Huang's father who rushed home and strangled her to death in anger, and when the police arrived they arrested Contemplacion on the orders of Huang's father
• Contemplacion did not give any statements to police after her arrest and strenuously denied all charges regarding the double murder she was accused of
• Contemplacion was twice forced to undergoelectric shock therapyagainst her will while on remand
• Contemplacion washandcuffedto a bedframe in the Changi Prison hospitalpsychiatric wardfor over a month
• Contemplacion was forced to take unknown tablets, possibly atranquilizer,everytime she attended court during her trial
• Parumog herself was put intosolitary confinementfor attempting to smuggle a letter out of prison from Contemplacion to her husband

Shortly afterwards, theMinistry of Home Affairsreleased acommuniquédenying all allegations, stating:

• when the police arrived at the crime scene Contemplacion was not there, Huang's father never mentioned Contemplacion's name during questioning nor made accusations against any other named person, and Contemplacion was in fact arrested in another part of Singapore later that day after the police themselves identified her as a person of interest
• Contemplacion made five statements to police, all of which were translated by aninterpreterfrom the Philippine Embassy in Singapore and written copies of each were then signed by Contemplacion herself
• although her original trial lawyer challenged their admissibility on alegal technicality,Contemplacion never disavowed the contents of the statements she gave to the police and she did not retract her original confession throughout her trial, appeal, or petition forclemencyfrom thePresident of Singapore
• Contemplacion was given twoEEG tests,one of which was in fact requested by her own defencepsychiatristDoctor Terence Burke, atTan Tock Seng hospitalto help determine her mental health, however she was never administered electric shocks at any point during her incarceration
• although Contemplacion was handcuffed to a bedframe while under psychiatric observation, this was standard procedure for all prisoners facing charges related tocapital punishmentfor security reasons and was not intended as a form of mistreatment
• while Contemplacion was prescribed medication for headaches and a sore throat while on remand, medical records proved she was not given any sort of medicine at all during her trial
• Changi Prison officers did not detect any attempt to smuggle letters from Contemplacion by Parumog or any other inmate
• Parumog was sent to solitary confinement cells on four different occasions, not for any events linked to Contemplacion but instead twice for fighting with other prisoners, once for giving herself atattooagainst prison regulations and once for asuicideattempt

Execution

Sister Gerard Fernandez(aGood Shepherdnun) accompanied Contemplacion on her final walk to thegallows,where they both sang the hymnAmazing Grace.Sister Gerard later described Contemplacion as being calm and at peace in her final moments.

Just beforedawnon the morning of 17 March 1995, Flor Contemplacion was hanged atChangi Prisonalongside three men convicted of drug trafficking.Her execution went ahead as scheduled despite a personal plea for clemency fromPresident of the PhilippinesFidel Ramosto the Singaporean government.

Aftermath

Many Filipinos believed that Contemplacion was innocent or at least insane, blaming the Singaporean government for a "lack of compassion", and the Philippine government for "not doing enough" to stop the execution. The Philippine Secretary of Foreign Affairs, Roberto Romulo, and Secretary of Labor and Employment,Nieves Confesor,both resigned as a result of the controversy.

The Philippine Embassy in Singapore in particular was heavily criticised, since it did little to help Contemplacion during the two years she was on remand, apart from delivering food and books to her in prison, and did not even have a consular representative as an observer in court throughout her trial.The former Embassy labour attache Reynaldo Catapang later confirmed that they did not hire a private lawyer to represent Contemplacion and allowed the Singaporean authorities to appoint apublic defenderinstead, nor did they keep any records of the legal proceedings or transcripts of the court case itself.

However, shortly after Contemplacion's execution the Philippines' former consul general in Singapore Elizabeth Buensuceso said that Contemplacion had disregarded the Embassy's warning not to make any admissions to the police until after she got proper legal representation in place.Buensuceso was also quoted by theManila Chroniclethat Contemplacion rejected their legal advice not to sign any confession after her arrest, saying "she was very furious then and kept shouting that she had committed the crime".It was also revealed that Contemplacion was allowed to have at least nine private consultations with Philippine Embassy officials without Singaporean authorities being present, yet she did not withdraw her original confession or change any aspect of her testimony at any of these meetings.

Although President Ramos seemed initially resigned to the execution, he called Contemplacion a heroine. His wife,First LadyAmelita Ramos,went to receive Contemplacion's coffin atNinoy Aquino International AirportinManilaon March 19. Contemplacion's body was carried from the airport to San Pablo, and thousands of Filipinos lined the route.President Ramos sent a wreath to Contemplacion's wake and offered financial assistance to Contemplacion's four children, who were dependent on their mother's income as a domestic worker, pledging one month of his salary to a scholarship fund.Prelates of thelocal Catholic Churchalso condemned the execution.

There were several protests held across the Philippines over Contemplacion's execution, some of which were organized by politicians and labor organizations. Thousands of Singapore flags were burned in the protests.In one of the protests, the mayor ofDavao Cityand future Philippine president,Rodrigo Duterte,burned aflag of Singaporewhile leading 1,000 employees of Davao City in protest.

Several threats against Singaporeans and Singapore properties in the Philippines were reported. Singaporean tourists either shortened or canceled their holiday trips in the Philippines in view of their safety. Skilled Singaporean workers working in the Philippines either left the country or were recalled back to Singapore by their companies.

TheAlex Boncayao Brigade,a Filipino assassination unit of the PhilippineNew People's Army,had threatened to kill Filipino officials and diplomats if they fail to stop Contemplacion's execution.

Following the execution, Prime MinisterGoh Chok Tong's planned trip to Manila, which was at the invitation of President Ramos, was postponed.President Ramos recalled the Filipino ambassador to Singapore, and many bilateral exchanges between the countries were cancelled.

A Presidential Fact Finding Commission was setup in the Philippines to investigate Contemplacion's case and the findings were submitted to President Ramos on April 6, 1995.In a statement by President Ramos, a protective programme was approved to oversee the welfare of overseas Filipinos with the deployment of government staff, lawyers and doctors to various countries.In response to the findings, the Singapore government rejected the findings but agreed to President Ramos's request to examine Maga's remains by two Singaporean pathologists and three foreign consultants.

The first autopsy done by Singaporean pathologists concluded that Maga died ofasphyxiadue to strangulation which was disputed by the Philippines'National Bureau of Investigationexperts.A final autopsy was conducted in July by an independent panel, whose results and would be final, and both governments required to accept the findings. If the findings determined that Maga did not die of asphyxia, the Singapore government will reopen Contemplacion's case and re-investigate the deaths of Maga and Huang.The independent panel ultimately did determine that Maga's cause of death was asphyxia, which the Philippines government accepted.Philippines and Singapore began to reconcile their bilateral relations.

1995 Presidential Fact Finding Commission

In April 1995, a Presidential Fact Finding Commission was set up by President Ramos to investigate the facts surrounding the death of Delia Maga and the conviction of Flor Contemplacion for her murder.The finished report recommended that the case be reopened, after gathering new testimony, in addition to earlier claims made by Parumog and Frenilla, such as:

• claims by Lucena Songalia Sarceno, who was serving a 16-month custodial sentence forextortionin Changi Women's Prison at the same time as Contemplacion was incarcerated there, that she overheard Philippine consul general Elizabeth Buensuceso advise Contemplacion in July 1992 to plead guilty and that she would only be sentenced to 5 years in prison if she did so
• Contemplacion had denied any involvement in the murders to Sarceno and claimed she had been forced to lie in acoffinfilled withdry ice
• Sarceno asserted she personally witnessed Contemplacion beingtorturedby prison guards viaelectrocutioninvolving a basin of water
• Sarceno also claimed Contemplacion appeared visibly drugged before going to court during her trial, often taking a few days to return to normalcognitive functioning,and Sarceno observed prison officers taking Contemplacion to the prison infirmary the day preceding each court appearance
• Contemplacion's niece Josie De Sagun claimed to have received a letter where Contemplacion made allegations of beingrapedand forced fed tranquilizers against her will
• Alicia Vinzon Mabulay claimed to have spoken to Contemplacion while she was briefly detained in Changi Prison forimmigration offencesin 1993, and was informed by Contemplacion that she was tortured and drugged by the guards
• the original trial judge should have considered a defence of diminished responsibility before finding Contemplacion guilty of murder and sentencing her to death

The Singaporean government described the findings as "totally absurd" and based on uncorroboratedhearsaytestimonies of individuals who did notwitness the crimeitself,and later released its own point by point rebuttal of the findings, such as:

• Contemplacion had confessed to the murders over a year before meeting Buensuceso and Sarceno was not present in the part of the prison where the interview took place on the day in question
• no coffins are kept in any prisons in Singapore and Contemplacion never complained of mistreatment to Philippine embassy officials who had visited her dozens of timesor to anun(Sister Gerard Fernandez) who visited her weekly on death row.

• although Contemplacion underwentEEG tests,they took place in a hospital 10 miles away where Sarceno wasn't present
• while it was true Contemplacion receivedantibioticsandpainkillerswhile on remand she was not issued any medication at all during her trial
• Contemplacion had never complained of being raped to visiting Philippine Embassy officials, all 70 letters sent by Contemplacion from prison were copied by authorities as a matter of policyand none of those contained any allegations of rape, and Contemplacion was detained in prisons with all female staff the entire time she was incarcerated
• Contemplacion was already segregated in thedeath rowsection of Moon Crescent Prison at the time Mabulay was imprisoned in the general population of Changi Women's Prison, therefore it was impossible for them to have spoken to each other
• Contemplacion was examined before her trial by independent psychiatrist Doctor Fong Yeng Hoi, who found she was not suffering from any mental illness that would impair her perception of events or people viahallucinationsand cause her to act irrationally, which therefore procedurally barred Contemplacion's lawyer from submitting a defence based on pleading not guilty byreason of insanity

Fate of Contemplacion's family

On October 20, 2005, three of Contemplacion's sons (Sandrex and twins Jun-Jun and Joel) were arrested for drug trafficking after a buy-buststing operationby theSan Pablo Citypolice, where an undercover officer boughtPHP3,000 worth ofmethamphetaminefrom the brothers. On March 9, 2011, all three were sentenced to life in prison and also fined PHP500,000 each for violation of theComprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002.In August 2008, Contemplacion'swidowerEfren and his new partner were arrested in a similar anti-drug operation by the same police force.

On April 6, 2013, Contemplacion's other son (Romulo) was arrested in San Pablo City in connection with the murder ofcouncilmanRoland Acbang inBarangaySan Crispin and the attempted murder of Rardine Mercado in Barangay Francisco. A police raid on the Barangay San Diego house Contemplacion and three other men were hiding in recoveredfirearmsandhand grenadesbelieved to be linked to the attacks.All four suspects were later charged with illegal possession of firearms and explosives, with murder charges also expected to be filed against them after police had finished theirforensic evidenceinvestigations.

In popular culture

The Flor Contemplacion Story,directed byJoel Lamanganand starringNora Aunorin the role of Contemplacion, was released by Viva Entertainment and also won Best Picture in theCairo Film Festivalin 1995.

The story of the victim starringGina Alajarin the role of Delia Maga was also featured in another film byRegal Filmsand Golden Lions Films Productions,Victim No. 1: Delia Maga (Jesus, Pray for Us!: A Massacre In Singapore),directed byCarlo J. Caparas.

In 1995, there is another documentary film of both Flor Contemplacion and Delia Maga in 1995 film calledBagong Bayani(aka "A New Hero" or "Unsung Heroine" ), directed byTikoy Aguiluz.StarringHelen Gamboaas Flor Contemplacion andChanda Romeroas Delia Maga.

The case of Flor Contemplacion was also featured in an episode ofGMA Network's crime documentary program,Case Unclosed.

The aftermath of Flor Contemplacion's family after her execution was dramatized on GMA Network's drama anthology series,Magpakailanman,starringAlessandra de Rossias Flor's daughter Russel, who was suffered from a string of unfortunate events after her mother's death including her husband's drug addiction, the imprisonment of her father and siblings from drugs, and hardships on balancing worktime and motherhood.The episode was titled "Life After the Death of Flor Contemplacion" and originally aired on April 13, 2013.

The Flor Contemplacion murders was also one of the iconic cases solved by ProfessorChao Tzee Cheng,the senior forensic pathologist. It was later re-enacted by the Singaporean crime showWhispers of the Deadin 2014. The perpetrator Flor Contemplacion and her two victims Nicholas Huang and Della Maga had their names changed for dramatic purposes and to protect their identities, although the overall turn of events and trial proceedings remained reminiscent of the real life events.

See also

• Capital punishment in Singapore
• Filipinos in Singapore
• Philippines-Singapore relations
• Mary Jane Veloso
• Sarah Balabagan,a Filipino maid convicted of murder inUnited Arab Emirates

Further reading

• Regional Briefing Philippines: Death Threat (March 23, 1995).Far Eastern Economic Review,p. 13.
• Rose-Coloured Glasses (March 30, 1995).Far Eastern Economic Review,p. 12.
• Manila Justice: Executed Filipina Hailed as Hero (March 30, 1995).Far Eastern Economic Review,p. 5.
• Regional Briefing Philippines: Autopsy Conflict (April 13, 1995).Far Eastern Economic Review,p. 13.
• Regional Briefing Philippines: Singapore Reopens Case (April 20, 1995).Far Eastern Economic Review,p. 13.
• The Fight For Flor (March 24, 1995).Asiaweek,p. 27.
• The Furor Over Flor (March 31, 1995).Asiaweek,p. 36.
• Beyond the Rage: Lessons from the Case of Flor Contemplacion (April 7, 1995).Asiaweek,p. 17.
• The Fallout From Flor: A President's Political Worries Over a Hanged Maid (April 7, 1995).Asiaweek,p. 30.
• Savage Blows (April 14, 1995).Asiaweek,p. 33.
• More Fallout From Flor (April 28, 1995).Asiaweek,p. 34.

External links

• Victim No. 1: Delia Maga (Jesus, Pray for Us!)atIMDb