Jump to content

French and Indian War

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromFrench & Indian War)

French and Indian War
Part of theSeven Years' Warand theSixty Years' War

The war theater
Date28 May 1754 – 10 February 1763(1754-05-281763-02-10)(8 years, 8 months, 1 week and 6 days)
Location
North America
Result

British victory

Territorial
changes
France cedesNew Franceeast of the Mississippi River to Great Britain, retainingSaint Pierre and Miquelon,and transfersLouisianatoSpain.
Belligerents

Great Britain

Iroquois Confederacy
WyandotofOhio Country
Catawba
Cherokee Nation(before 1758)
Mingo(briefly)

France

Wabanaki Confederacy

Algonquin
Lenape
Ojibwa
Ottawa
Shawnee
WyandotofFort Detroit
Commanders and leaders
Captain Jacobs
Killbuck
Shingas
Pontiac
Strength
42,000 regulars and militia (peak strength, 1758)[1] 10,000 regulars (troupes de la terreandtroupes de la marine,peak strength, 1757)[2]
Casualties and losses
  • 1,512 killed in action
  • 1,500 died of wounds
  • 10,400 died of disease[3]
Unknown

TheFrench and Indian War(1754–1763) was atheaterof theSeven Years' War,which pitted the North American colonies of theBritish Empireagainst those of theFrench,each side being supported by variousNative Americantribes. At the start of the war, the French colonies had a population of roughly 60,000 settlers, compared with 2 million in the British colonies.[4]The outnumbered French particularly depended on their native allies.[5]

Two years into the war, in 1756, Great Britain declared war on France, beginning the worldwideSeven Years' War.Many view the French and Indian War as being merely the American theater of this conflict; however, in the United States the French and Indian War is viewed as a singular conflict which was not associated with any European war.[6]French Canadians call it theguerre de la Conquête('War of the Conquest').[7][8]

The British colonists were supported at various times by theIroquois,Catawba,andCherokeetribes, and the French colonists were supported byWabanaki Confederacymember tribesAbenakiandMi'kmaq,and theAlgonquin,Lenape,Ojibwa,Ottawa,Shawnee,andWyandot(Huron) tribes.[9]Fighting took place primarily along the frontiers between New France and the British colonies, from theProvince of Virginiain the south toNewfoundlandin the north. It began with a dispute over control of the confluence of theAllegheny RiverandMonongahela Rivercalled theForks of the Ohio,and the site of the FrenchFort Duquesneat the location that later becamePittsburgh,Pennsylvania. The dispute erupted into violence in theBattle of Jumonville Glenin May 1754, during which Virginia militiamen under the command of 22-year-oldGeorge Washingtonambushed a French patrol.[10]

In 1755, six colonial governors met with GeneralEdward Braddock,the newly arrived British Army commander, and planned a four-way attack on the French. None succeeded, andthe main effortby Braddock proved a disaster; he lost theBattle of the Monongahelaon July 9, 1755, and died a few days later. British operations failed in the frontier areas of theProvince of Pennsylvaniaand theProvince of New Yorkduring 1755–57 due to a combination of poor management, internal divisions, effectiveCanadienscouts, French regular forces, and Native warrior allies. In 1755, the British capturedFort Beauséjouron the border separatingNova ScotiafromAcadia,and they ordered theexpulsion of the Acadians(1755–64) soon afterwards. Orders for the deportation were given by Commander-in-ChiefWilliam Shirleywithout direction from Great Britain. The Acadians were expelled, both those captured in arms and those who had sworn the loyalty oath to the king. Natives likewise were driven off the land to make way for settlers from New England.[11]

The British Pitt government fell due to disastrous campaigns in 1757, including a failedexpedition against Louisbourgand theSiege of Fort William Henry;this last was followed by the Natives torturing and massacring their colonial victims.William Pittcame to power and significantly increased British military resources in the colonies at a time when France was unwilling to risk large convoys to aid the limited forces that they had in New France, preferring to concentrate their forces againstPrussiaand its allies who were now engaged in the Seven Years' War in Europe. The conflict in Ohio ended in 1758 with the British–American victory in the Ohio Country. Between 1758 and 1760, the British military launched a campaign to captureFrench Canada.They succeeded in capturing territory in surrounding colonies and ultimatelythe city of Quebec(1759). The following year the British were victorious in theMontreal Campaignin which the French ceded Canada in accordance with theTreaty of Paris (1763).

France also ceded its territory east of the Mississippi to Great Britain, as well asFrench Louisianawest of theMississippi Riverto its ally Spain in compensation for Spain's loss to Britain ofSpanish Florida.(Spain had ceded Florida to Britain in exchange for the return ofHavana,Cuba.) France's colonial presence north of the Caribbean was reduced to the islands ofSaint Pierre and Miquelon,confirming Great Britain's position as the dominant colonial power innorthern America.

Nomenclature

In British America, wars were often named after the sitting British monarch, such asKing William's WarorQueen Anne's War.There had already been aKing George's Warin the 1740s during the reign ofKing George II,so British colonists named this conflict after their opponents, and it became known as theFrench and Indian War.[12]This continues as the standard name for the war in the United States, althoughindigenous peoplesfought on both sides of the conflict. It also led into the Seven Years' War overseas, a much larger conflict between France and Great Britain that did not involve the American colonies; some historians make a connection between the French and Indian War and the Seven Years' War overseas, but most residents of the United States consider them as two separate conflicts—only one of which involved the American colonies,[13]and American historians generally use the traditional name. Less frequently used names for the war include theFourth Intercolonial Warand theGreat War for the Empire.[12]

Belligerents during theSeven Years' War.Canadians and Europeans view the French and Indian War as a theater of the Seven Years' War, while Americans view it a separate conflict.

In Europe, the French and Indian War is conflated into the Seven Years' War and not given a separate name. "Seven Years" refers to events in Europe, from the official declaration of war in 1756—two years after the French and Indian War had started—to the signing of the peace treaty in 1763. The French and Indian War in America, by contrast, was largely concluded in six years from theBattle of Jumonville Glenin 1754 to the capture of Montreal in 1760.[12]

Canadians conflate both the European and American conflicts into the Seven Years' War (Guerre de Sept Ans).[7]French Canadians also use the term "War of Conquest" (Guerre de la Conquête), since it is the war in whichNew Francewas conquered by the British and became part of the British Empire. In Quebec, this term was promoted by popular historiansJacques LacoursièreandDenis Vaugeois,who borrowed from the ideas ofMaurice Séguinin considering this war as a dramatic tipping point of French Canadian identity and nationhood.[14]

Background

Thecoureurs des boiswere French-Canadianfur traders,who did business with natives throughout theMississippiandSt. Lawrence watershed.

At this time, North America east of the Mississippi River was largely claimed by either Great Britain or France. Large areas had no colonial settlements. The French population numbered about 75,000 and was heavily concentrated along theSt. Lawrence Rivervalley, with some also in Acadia (present-dayNew Brunswickand parts ofNova Scotia), including Île Royale (Cape Breton Island). Fewer lived inNew Orleans;Biloxi, Mississippi;Mobile, Alabama;and small settlements in theIllinois Country,hugging the east side of the Mississippi River and its tributaries. French fur traders and trappers traveled throughout the St. Lawrence and Mississippi watersheds, did business with local Indian tribes, and often married Indian women.[15]Traders married daughters of chiefs, creating high-ranking unions.

British settlers outnumbered the French 20 to 1[16]with a population of about 1.5 million ranged along the Atlantic coast of the continent from Nova Scotia and theColony of Newfoundlandin the north to theProvince of Georgiain the south.[17]Many of the older colonies' land claims extended arbitrarily far to the west, as the extent of the continent was unknown at the time when their provincial charters were granted. Their population centers were along the coast, but the settlements were growing into the interior. The British captured Nova Scotia from France in 1713, which still had a significant French-speaking population. Britain also claimedRupert's Landwhere theHudson's Bay Companytraded for furs with local Indian tribes.

Iroquois expansion, 1711. By the mid-18th century, theIroquois Confederacyhad expanded from Upstate New York to theOhio Country.

Between the French and British colonists, large areas were dominated by Indian tribes. To the north, theMi'kmaqand theAbenakiswere engaged inFather Le Loutre's Warand still held sway in parts of Nova Scotia, Acadia, and the eastern portions of theprovince of Canada,as well as much of Maine.[18]TheIroquois Confederationdominated much of upstate New York and theOhio Country,although Ohio also includedAlgonquian-speaking populations ofDelawareandShawnee,as well asIroquoian-speakingMingos.These tribes were formally under Iroquois rule and were limited by them in their authority to make agreements.[19]The Iroquois Confederation initially held a stance of neutrality to ensure continued trade with both French and British. Though maintaining this stance proved difficult as the Iroquois Confederation tribes sided and supported French or British causes depending on which side provided the most beneficial trade.[20]

The Southeast interior was dominated by Siouan-speakingCatawbas,Muskogee-speakingCreeksandChoctaw,and the Iroquoian-speakingCherokeetribes.[21]When war broke out, the French colonists used their trading connections to recruit fighters from tribes in western portions of theGreat Lakes region,which was not directly subject to the conflict between the French and British; these included theHurons,Mississaugas,Ojibwas,Winnebagos,andPotawatomi.

The British colonists were supported in the war by the IroquoisSix Nationsand also by the Cherokees, until differences sparked theAnglo-Cherokee Warin 1758. In 1758, theProvince of Pennsylvaniasuccessfully negotiated theTreaty of Eastonin which a number of tribes in the Ohio Country promised neutrality in exchange for land concessions and other considerations. Most of the other northern tribes sided with the French, their primary trading partner and supplier of arms. The Creeks and Cherokees were subject to diplomatic efforts by both the French and British to gain either their support or neutrality in the conflict.[22][additional citation(s) needed]

TheCherokee,c. 1762. The Cherokee were subject to diplomatic efforts from the British and French to gain their support or neutrality in the event of a conflict.

At this time, Spain claimed only the province of Florida in eastern America. It controlled Cuba and other territories in theWest Indiesthat became military objectives in the Seven Years' War. Florida's European population was a few hundred, concentrated inSt. Augustine.[23]

General James Wolfe, British commander

There were no French regular army troops stationed in America at the onset of war. New France was defended by about 3,000troupes de la marine,companies of colonial regulars (some of whom had significant woodland combat experience). The colonial government recruited militia support when needed. The British had few troops. Most of the British colonies mustered local militia companies to deal with Indian threats, generally ill trained and available only for short periods, but they did not have any standing forces. Virginia, by contrast, had a large frontier with several companies of British regulars.[citation needed]

When hostilities began, the British colonial governments preferred operating independently of one another and of the government in London. This situation complicated negotiations with Indian tribes, whose territories often encompassed land claimed by multiple colonies. As the war progressed, the leaders of the British Army establishment tried to impose constraints and demands on the colonial administrations.[citation needed]

Céloron's expedition

New France's Governor-GeneralRoland-Michel Barrin de La Galissonièrewas concerned about the incursion and expanding influence in the Ohio Country of British colonial traders such asGeorge Croghan.In June 1747, he orderedPierre-Joseph Céloronto lead a military expedition through the area. Its objectives were:

Roland-Michel Barrin de La Galissonière,Governor of New France, sent an expedition in 1749 into the Ohio Country in an attempt to assert French sovereignty.
  • to reaffirm to New France's Indian allies that their trading arrangements with colonists were exclusive to those authorized by New France
  • to confirm Indian assistance in asserting and maintaining the French claim to the territories which French explorers had claimed
  • to discourage any alliances between Britain and local Indian tribes
  • to impress the Indians with a French show of force against British colonial settler incursion, unauthorized trading expeditions, and general trespass against French claims[24]

Céloron's expedition force consisted of about 200Troupes de la marineand 30 Indians, and they covered about 3,000 miles (4,800 km) between June and November 1749. They went up the St. Lawrence, continued along the northern shore ofLake Ontario,crossed the portage at Niagara, and followed the southern shore ofLake Erie.At theChautauqua PortagenearBarcelona, New York,the expedition moved inland to theAllegheny River,which it followed to the site ofPittsburgh.There Céloron buried lead plates engraved with the French claim to the Ohio Country.[24]Whenever he encountered British colonial merchants or fur-traders, he informed them of the French claims on the territory and told them to leave.[24]

Céloron's expedition arrived atLogstownwhere the Indians in the area informed him that they owned the Ohio Country and that they would trade with the British colonists regardless of the French.[25]He continued south until his expedition reached the confluence of the Ohio and theMiamirivers, which lay just south of the village ofPickawillany,the home of theMiamichief known as "Old Briton".Céloron threatened Old Briton with severe consequences if he continued to trade with British colonists, but Old Briton ignored the warning. Céloron returned disappointedly to Montreal in November 1749.[26]

Céloron wrote an extensively detailed report. "All I can say is that the Natives of these localities are very badly disposed towards the French," he wrote, "and are entirely devoted to the English. I don't know in what way they could be brought back."[25]Even before his return to Montreal, reports on the situation in the Ohio Country were making their way to London and Paris, each side proposing that action be taken.MassachusettsgovernorWilliam Shirleywas particularly forceful, stating that British colonists would not be safe as long as the French were present.[27]

Negotiations

European colonies in North America, c. 1750. Disputes over territorial claims persisted after the end ofKing George's Warin 1748.

TheWar of the Austrian Successionended in 1748 with the signing of theTreaty of Aix-la-Chapelle,which was primarily focused on resolving issues in Europe. The issues of conflicting territorial claims between British and French colonies were turned over to a commission, but it reached no decision. Frontier areas were claimed by both sides, from Nova Scotia and Acadia in the north to the Ohio Country in the south. The disputes also extended into theAtlantic Ocean,where both powers wanted access to the rich fisheries of theGrand BanksoffNewfoundland.[citation needed]

In 1749, the British government gave land to theOhio Company of Virginiafor the purpose of developing trade and settlements in the Ohio Country.[28]The grant required that it settle 100 families in the territory and construct a fort for their protection. But the territory was also claimed by Pennsylvania, and both colonies began pushing for action to improve their respective claims.[29]In 1750,Christopher Gistexplored the Ohio territory, acting on behalf of both Virginia and the company, and he opened negotiations with the Indian tribes at Logstown.[30]He completed the1752 Treaty of Logstownin which the local Indians agreed to terms through their "Half-King"Tanacharisonand an Iroquois representative. These terms included permission to build a strong house at the mouth of theMonongahela Riveron the modern site ofPittsburgh,Pennsylvania.[31]

Escalation in Ohio Country

Governor-General of New FranceMarquis de la Jonquièredied on March 17, 1752, and he was temporarily replaced by Charles le Moyne de Longueuil. His permanent replacement was to bethe Marquis Duquesne,but he did not arrive in New France until 1752 to take over the post.[32]The continuing British activity in the Ohio territories prompted Longueuil to dispatch another expedition to the area under the command ofCharles Michel de Langlade,an officer in the Troupes de la Marine. Langlade was given 300 men, includingFrench-Canadiansand warriors of theOttawa tribe.His objective was to punish the Miami people of Pickawillany for not following Céloron's orders to cease trading with the British. On June 21, the French war partyattacked the trading centerat Pickawillany, capturing three traders[26]and killing 14 Miami Indians, including Old Briton. He was reportedly ritually cannibalized by some Indians in the expedition party.

Construction of French fortifications

Fort Le Boeufin 1754. In the spring of 1753, the French began to build a series of forts in the Ohio Country.

In the spring of 1753,Paul Marin de la Malguewas given command of a 2,000-man force of Troupes de la Marine and Indians. His orders were to protect the King's land in the Ohio Valley from the British. Marin followed the route that Céloron had mapped out four years earlier. Céloron, however, had limited the record of French claims to the burial of lead plates, whereas Marin constructed and garrisoned forts. He first constructedFort Presque Isleon Lake Erie's south shore nearErie, Pennsylvania,and he had a road built to the headwaters ofLeBoeuf Creek.He then constructed a second fort atFort Le BoeufinWaterford, Pennsylvania,designed to guard the headwaters of LeBoeuf Creek. As he moved south, he drove off or captured British traders, alarming both the British and the Iroquois.Tanaghrissonwas a chief of theMingoIndians, who were remnants of Iroquois and other tribes who had been driven west by colonial expansion. He intensely disliked the French whom he accused of killing and eating his father. He traveled to Fort Le Boeuf and threatened the French with military action, which Marin contemptuously dismissed.[33]

The Iroquois sent runners to the manor ofWilliam Johnsonin upstate New York, who was the British Superintendent for Indian Affairs in the New York region and beyond. Johnson was known to the Iroquois asWarraghiggey,meaning "he who does great things." He spoke their languages and had become a respected honorary member of theIroquois Confederacyin the area, and he was made a colonel of the Iroquois in 1746; he was later commissioned as a colonel of the Western New York Militia.

The Indian representatives and Johnson met with GovernorGeorge Clintonand officials from some of the other American colonies atAlbany, New York.MohawkChief Hendrickwas the speaker of their tribal council, and he insisted that the British abide by their obligations[which?]and block French expansion. Clinton did not respond to his satisfaction, and Hendrick said that the "Covenant Chain"was broken, a long-standing friendly relationship between the Iroquois Confederacy and the British Crown.

Virginia's response

In 1754,George Washingtonof theVirginia Regimentwas dispatched to warn the French to leave Virginian territory.

GovernorRobert Dinwiddieof Virginia was an investor in the Ohio Company, which stood to lose money if the French held their claim.[34]He ordered 21-year-old MajorGeorge Washington(whose brother was another Ohio Company investor) of theVirginia Regimenttowarn the French to leave Virginia territoryin October 1753.[35]Washington left with a small party, picking upJacob Van Braamas an interpreter,Christopher Gist(a company surveyor working in the area), and a few Mingos led by Tanaghrisson. On December 12, Washington and his men reached Fort Le Boeuf.[36][37]

Jacques Legardeur de Saint-Pierresucceeded Marin as commander of the French forces after Marin died on October 29, and he invited Washington to dine with him. Over dinner, Washington presented Saint-Pierre with the letter from Dinwiddie demanding an immediate French withdrawal from the Ohio Country. Saint-Pierre said, "As to the Summons you send me to retire, I do not think myself obliged to obey it."[38]He told Washington that France's claim to the region was superior to that of the British, sinceRené-Robert Cavelier, Sieur de La Sallehad explored the Ohio Country nearly a century earlier.[39]

Washington's party left Fort Le Boeuf early on December 16 and arrived inWilliamsburgon January 16, 1754. He stated in his report, "The French had swept south",[40]detailing the steps which they had taken to fortify the area, and their intention to fortify the confluence of the Allegheny and Monongahela rivers.[41]

Course of war

Even before Washington returned, Dinwiddie had sent a company of 40 men underWilliam Trentto that point where they began construction of a smallstockadedfort in the early months of 1754.[42]Governor Duquesne sent additional French forces underClaude-Pierre Pécaudy de Contrecœurto relieve Saint-Pierre during the same period, and Contrecœur led 500 men south from Fort Venango on April 5, 1754.[43]These forces arrived at the fort on April 16, but Contrecœur generously allowed Trent's small company to withdraw. He purchased their construction tools to continue building what becameFort Duquesne.[44]

Early engagements

Dinwiddie had ordered Washington to lead a larger force to assist Trent in his work, and Washington learned of Trent's retreat while he was en route.[45]Mingo sachem Tanaghrisson had promised support to the British, so Washington continued toward Fort Duquesne and met with him. He then learned of a French scouting party in the area from a warrior sent by Tanaghrisson, so he added Tanaghrisson's dozen Mingo warriors to his own party. Washington's combined force of 52 ambushed 40Canadiens(French colonists ofNew France) on the morning of May 28 in what became known as theBattle of Jumonville Glen.[46]They killed many of the Canadiens, including their commanding officerJoseph Coulon de Jumonville,whose head was reportedly split open by Tanaghrisson with a tomahawk. HistorianFred Andersonsuggests that Tanaghrisson was acting to gain the support of the British and to regain authority over his own people. They had been inclined to support the French, with whom they had long trading relationships. One of Tanaghrisson's men told Contrecoeur that Jumonville had been killed by British musket fire.[47]Historians generally consider the Battle of Jumonville Glen as the opening battle of the French and Indian War in North America, and the start of hostilities in the Ohio valley.

Washington with his war council during theBattle of Fort Necessity.After deliberations, it was decided to withdraw, and surrender thefort.

Following the battle, Washington pulled back several miles and establishedFort Necessity,which the Canadians attacked under the command of Jumonville's brother at theBattle of Fort Necessityon July 3. Washington surrendered and negotiated a withdrawal under arms. One of his men reported that the Canadian force was accompanied byShawnee,Delaware,and Mingo warriors—just those whom Tanaghrisson was seeking to influence.[48]

News of the two battles reached England in August. After several months of negotiations, the government ofthe Duke of Newcastledecided to send an army expedition the following year to dislodge the French.[49]They chose Major GeneralEdward Braddockto lead the expedition.[50]Word of the British military plans leaked to France well before Braddock's departure for North America. In response,King Louis XVdispatched six regiments to New France under the command ofBaron Dieskauin 1755.[51]The British sent out their fleet in February 1755, intending to blockade French ports, but the French fleet had already sailed. AdmiralEdward Hawkedetached a fast squadron to North America in an attempt to intercept them.

In June 1755, the BritishcapturedFrench naval ships sent to provide warmatérielto theAcadianand Mi'kmaw militias in Nova Scotia.

In a second British action, AdmiralEdward Boscawenfired on theFrench shipAlcideon June 8, 1755,capturing herand two troop ships.[52]The British harassed French shipping throughout 1755, seizing ships and capturing seamen. These actions contributed to the eventual formal declarations of war in spring 1756.[53]

An early important political response to the opening of hostilities was the convening of theAlbany Congressin June and July, 1754. The goal of the congress was to formalize a unified front in trade and negotiations with the Indians, since the allegiance of the various tribes and nations was seen to be pivotal in the war that was unfolding. The plan that the delegates agreed to was neither ratified by the colonial legislatures nor approved by the Crown. Nevertheless, the format of the congress and many specifics of the plan became the prototype for confederation during theWar of Independence.

British campaigns, 1755

The British formed an aggressive plan of operations for 1755. General Braddock was to lead the expedition to Fort Duquesne,[54]while Massachusetts governorWilliam Shirleywas given the task of fortifyingFort Oswegoand attackingFort Niagara.Sir William Johnsonwas to captureFort St. FrédéricatCrown Point, New York,[55]and Lieutenant ColonelRobert Moncktonwas to captureFort Beauséjourto the east on the frontier between Nova Scotia and Acadia.[56]

British forces under fire from the French and Indian forces atMonongahela,when theBraddock expeditionfailed to takeFort Duquesne.

Braddock led about 1,500 army troops and provincial militia on theBraddock expeditionin June 1755 to take Fort Duquesne, with George Washington as one of his aides. The expedition was a disaster. It wasattackedby French regulars,Canadian Militiamen,and Indian warriors ambushing them from hiding places up in trees and behind logs, and Braddock called for a retreat. He was killed and approximately 1,000 British soldiers were killed or injured.[54]The remaining 500 British troops retreated to Virginia, led by Washington. Washington andThomas Gageplayed key roles in organizing the retreat—two future opponents in theAmerican Revolutionary War.

The British government initiated a plan to increase their military capability in preparation for war following news of Braddock's defeat and the start of parliament's session in November 1755. Among the early legislative measures were theRecruiting Act 1756,[57]theCommissions to Foreign Protestants Act 1756[58]for theRoyal American Regiment,theNavigation Act 1756,[59]and theContinuance of Laws Act 1756.[60]England passed the Naval Prize Act 1756 following the proclamation of war on May 17 to allow the capture of ships and establish privateering.[61]

The French acquired a copy of the British war plans, including the activities of Shirley and Johnson. Shirley's efforts to fortify Oswego were bogged down in logistical difficulties, exacerbated by his inexperience in managing large expeditions. In conjunction, he was made aware that the French were massing for an attack on Fort Oswego in his absence when he planned to attack Fort Niagara. As a response, he left garrisons at Oswego,Fort Bull,and Fort Williams, the last two located on theOneida Carrybetween theMohawk RiverandWood CreekatRome, New York.Supplies were cached at Fort Bull for use in the projected attack on Niagara.

Johnson's expedition was better organized than Shirley's, which was noticed by New France's governor theMarquis de Vaudreuil.Vaudreuil had been concerned about the extended supply line to the forts on the Ohio, and he had sent Baron Dieskau to lead the defenses at Frontenac against Shirley's expected attack. Vaudreuil saw Johnson as the larger threat and sent Dieskau to Fort St. Frédéric to meet that threat. Dieskau planned to attack the British encampment atFort Edwardat the upper end of navigation on theHudson River,but Johnson had strongly fortified it, and Dieskau's Indian support was reluctant to attack. The two forces finally met in the bloodyBattle of Lake Georgebetween Fort Edward andFort William Henry.The battle ended inconclusively, with both sides withdrawing from the field. Johnson's advance stopped at Fort William Henry, and the French withdrew to Ticonderoga Point, where they began the construction ofFort Carillon(later renamedFort Ticonderogaafter the British captured it in 1759).

British raid on the Acadian settlement of Grimross. Efforts to undermine the FrenchFortress of Louisbourgresulted in theforcible removal of the Acadians.

Colonel Moncktoncaptured Fort Beauséjourin June 1755 in the sole British success that year, cutting off the FrenchFortress Louisbourgfrom land-based reinforcements. To cut vital supplies to Louisbourg, Nova Scotia's GovernorCharles Lawrenceordered the deportation of the French-speakingAcadianpopulation from the area. Monckton's forces, including companies ofRogers' Rangers,forcibly removedthousands of Acadians, chasing down many who resisted and sometimes committing atrocities. Cutting off supplies to Louisbourg led to its demise.[62]The Acadian resistance was sometimes quite stiff, in concert with Indian allies including the Mi'kmaq, with ongoing frontier raids againstDartmouthandLunenburg,among others. The only clashes of any size were atPetitcodiacin 1755 and atBloody CreeknearAnnapolis Royalin 1757, other than the campaigns to expel the Acadians ranging around theBay of Fundy,on thePetitcodiacandSt. Johnrivers, andÎle Saint-Jean.

Map of Quebec with the distribution of French and British

French victories, 1756–1757

Following the death of Braddock, William Shirley assumed command of British forces in North America, and he laid out his plans for 1756 at a meeting in Albany in December 1755. He proposed renewing the efforts to capture Niagara, Crown Point, and Duquesne, with attacks onFort Frontenacon the north shore of Lake Ontario and an expedition through the wilderness of theMaine districtand down theChaudière Riverto attack thecity of Quebec.His plan, however, got bogged down by disagreements and disputes with others, including William Johnson and New York's GovernorSir Charles Hardy,and consequently gained little support.

In January 1756,John Campbellwas named as the new BritishCommander-in-Chief, North America.

Newcastle replaced him in January 1756 withLord Loudoun,with Major GeneralJames Abercrombieas his second in command. Neither of these men had as much campaign experience as the trio of officers whom France sent to North America.[53]French regular army reinforcements arrived in New France in May 1756, led by Major GeneralLouis-Joseph de Montcalmand seconded by theChevalier de Lévisand Colonel François-Charles de Bourlamaque, all experienced veterans from theWar of the Austrian Succession.On May 17, 1756, Britain formally declared war on France, which expanded the war into Europe and came to be known as theSeven Years' War.

Governor Vaudreuil had ambitions to become the French commander in chief, in addition to his role as governor, and he acted during the winter of 1756 before those reinforcements arrived. Scouts had reported the weakness of the British supply chain, so he ordered an attack against the forts which Shirley had erected at the Oneida Carry. In theBattle of Fort Bull,French forces destroyed the fort and large quantities of supplies, including 45,000 pounds of gunpowder. They set back any British hopes for campaigns on Lake Ontario and endangered the Oswego garrison, already short on supplies. French forces in the Ohio valley also continued to intrigue with Indians throughout the area, encouraging them to raid frontier settlements. This led to ongoing alarms along the western frontiers, with streams of refugees returning east to get away from the action.

In August 1756, French soldiers and native warriors led byLouis-Joseph de Montcalmsuccessfullyattacked Fort Oswego.

The new British command was not in place until July. Abercrombie arrived in Albany but refused to take any significant actions until Loudoun approved them, and Montcalm took bold action against his inertia. He built on Vaudreuil's work harassing the Oswego garrison and executed a strategicfeintby moving his headquarters to Ticonderoga, as if to presage another attack along Lake George. With Abercrombie pinned down at Albany, Montcalm slipped away and led thesuccessful attack on Oswegoin August. In the aftermath, Montcalm and the Indians under his command disagreed about the disposition of prisoners' personal effects. The Europeans did not consider them prizes and prevented the Indians from stripping the prisoners of their valuables, which angered the Indians.

Loudoun was a capable administrator but a cautious field commander, and he planned one major operation for 1757: an attack on New France's capital ofQuebec.He left a sizable force at Fort William Henry to distract Montcalm and began organizing for the expedition to Quebec. He was then ordered to attack Louisbourg first by William Pitt, theSecretary of Stateresponsible for the colonies. The expedition was beset by delays of all kinds but was finally ready to sail fromHalifax, Nova Scotia,in early August. In the meantime, French ships had escaped the British blockade of the French coast, and a fleet awaited Loudoun at Louisbourg which outnumbered the British fleet. Faced with this strength, Loudoun returned to New York amid news thata massacre had occurred at Fort William Henry.

Montcalm attempts to stop native warriors from attacking the British. A number of British soldiers were killed after theSiege of Fort William Henry.

French irregular forces (Canadian scouts and Indians) harassed Fort William Henry throughout the first half of 1757. In January, theyambushed British rangersnear Ticonderoga. In February, they launched a raid against the position across the frozen Lake George, destroying storehouses and buildings outside the main fortification. In early August, Montcalm and 7,000 troops besieged the fort, which capitulated with an agreement to withdraw under parole. When the withdrawal began, some of Montcalm's Indian allies attacked the British column because they were angry about the lost opportunity for loot, killing and capturing several hundred men, women, children, and slaves. The aftermath of the siege may have contributed to the transmission ofsmallpoxinto remote Indian populations, as some Indians were reported to have traveled from beyond the Mississippi to participate in the campaign and returned afterward. Modern writer William Nester believes that the Indians might have been exposed to European carriers, although no proof exists.[63]

British conquest, 1758–1760

Vaudreuil and Montcalm were minimally resupplied in 1758, as the British blockade of the French coastline limited French shipping. The situation in New France was further exacerbated by a poor harvest in 1757, a difficult winter, and the allegedly corrupt machinations ofFrançois Bigot,theintendant of the territory.His schemes to supply the colony inflated prices and were believed by Montcalm to line his pockets and those of his associates. A massive outbreak ofsmallpoxamong western Indian tribes led many of them to stay away from trading in 1758. The disease probably spread through the crowded conditions at William Henry after the battle;[64]yet the Indians blamed the French for bringing "bad medicine" as well as denying them prizes at Fort William Henry.

Montcalm focused his meager resources on the defense of the St. Lawrence, with primary defenses at Carillon, Quebec, and Louisbourg, while Vaudreuil argued unsuccessfully for a continuation of the raiding tactics that had worked quite effectively in previous years.[65]The British failures in North America combined with other failures in the European theater and led to Newcastle's fall from power along with the Duke of Cumberland, his principal military advisor.

British forcesbesiegingthe Fortress of Louisbourg. The French fortress fell in July 1758 after a 48-day siege.

Newcastle and Pittjoined in an uneasy coalitionin which Pitt dominated the military planning. He embarked on a plan for the 1758 campaign that was largely developed by Loudoun. He had been replaced by Abercrombie as commander in chief after the failures of 1757. Pitt's plan called for three major offensive actions involving large numbers of regular troops supported by the provincial militias, aimed at capturing the heartlands of New France. Two of the expeditions were successful, withFort DuquesneandLouisbourgfalling to sizable British forces.

1758

TheForbes Expeditionwas a British campaign in September–October 1758, with 6,000 troops led by GeneralJohn Forbessent to drive out the French from the contested Ohio Country. The French withdrew from Fort Duquesne and left the British in control of the Ohio River Valley.[66]The great French fortress atLouisbourgin Nova Scotia was captured after a siege.[67]

A British expedition sent to invadeCanadawas repulsed by the French at theBattle of Carillonin July 1758.

The third invasion was stopped with the improbable French victory in theBattle of Carillon,in which 3,600 Frenchmen defeated Abercrombie's force of 18,000 regulars, militia, and Indian allies outside the fort which the French called Carillon and the British called Ticonderoga. Abercrombie saved something from the disaster when he sentJohn Bradstreeton an expedition that successfullydestroyed Fort Frontenac,including caches of supplies destined for New France's western forts and furs destined for Europe. Abercrombie was recalled and replaced byJeffery Amherst,victor at Louisbourg.

The French had generally poor results in 1758 in most theaters of the war. The new foreign minister was theduc de Choiseul,and he decided to focus on aninvasion of Britainto draw British resources away from North America and the European mainland. The invasion failed both militarily and politically, as Pitt again planned significant campaigns against New France and sent funds to Britain's mainland ally of Prussia, while the French Navy failed in the 1759 naval battles atLagosandQuiberon Bay.In one piece of good fortune, some French supply ships did manage to depart France and elude the British blockade of the French coast.

1759–1760

After a three-month siege of Quebec City, British forces captured the city at thePlains of Abraham.

The British proceeded to wage a campaign in the northwest frontier of Canada in an effort to cut off the French frontier forts to the west and south. Theycaptured TiconderogaandFort Niagara,and they defeated the French at theThousand Islandsin the summer of 1759. In September 1759,James Wolfedefeated Montcalm in theBattle of the Plains of Abrahamwhich claimed the lives of both commanders. After the battle, the Frenchcapitulated the cityto the British.

In April 1760,François Gaston de Lévisled French forces to launch an attack to retake Quebec. Although he won theBattle of Sainte-Foy,Lévis' subsequentsiege of Quebecended in defeat when British ships arrived to relieve the garrison. After Lévis had retreated he was given another blow when a Britishnaval victory at Restigouchebrought the loss of French ships meant to resupply his army. In JulyJeffrey Amherstthen led British forces numbering around 18,000 men in athree pronged attack on Montreal.After eliminating French positions along the way all three forces met up and surrounded Montreal in September. Many Canadians deserted or surrendered their arms to British forces while the Native allies of the French sought peace and neutrality. De Lévis and theMarquis de Vaudreuilreluctantly signed theArticles of Capitulation of Montrealon September 8 which effectively completed the British conquest of New France.

Sporadic engagements, 1760–1763

Most of the fighting ended in America in 1760, although it continued in Europe between France and Britain. The notable exception was the French seizure ofSt. John's, Newfoundland.General Amherst heard of this surprise action and immediately dispatched troops under his nephewWilliam Amherst,who regained control of Newfoundland after theBattle of Signal Hillin September 1762.[68]Many of the British troops who were stationed in America were reassigned to participate in further British actions in the West Indies, including thecapture of Spanish Havanawhen Spain belatedly entered the conflict on the side of France, and aBritish expedition against French Martiniquein 1762 led by Major GeneralRobert Monckton.[69]

Peace

French authorities surrendering Montreal to British forces in 1760.

Governor Vaudreuil in Montrealnegotiated a capitulationwithGeneral Amherstin September 1760. Amherst granted his requests that any French residents who chose to remain in the colony would be given freedom to continue worshiping in theirRoman Catholictradition, to own property, and to remain undisturbed in their homes. The British provided medical treatment for the sick and wounded French soldiers, andFrench regular troopswere returned to France aboard British ships with an agreement that they were not to serve again in the present war.[70]

General Amherst also oversaw the transfer of French fortifications to British control on the western frontier. The policies which he introduced in those lands disturbed large numbers of Natives and contributed to the outbreak ofPontiac's Warin 1763,[71]in which a series of Native attacks on frontier forts occurred, such as that onFort Miamiwhich effectively brought a nearly half-century long period of European garrisoning atKekiongato an end. The frontier settlements required the continued deployment of British forces, and the conflict was not fully concluded until 1766.[72]

Beginning from the 1750s and lasting until the 1760s, a smallpox outbreak devastated several Native communities throughout theAmerican Midwest.The outbreak was brought on in part by victorious Native warriors who had fought on the side of the French bringing homeprizes of warwhich had been infected with the disease; theOjibwe,OdawaandPotawatomipeoples were most affected by the outbreak. Anoral accountfrom Odawa tribal leader and historianAndrew Blackbirdclaimed that the outbreak had "entirely depopulated and laid waste" toWaganagisi,a large Odawa settlement.[73][74]

The war in North America, along with the global Seven Years' War, officially ended with the signing of theTreaty of Parison 10 February 1763, by the kingdoms of Great Britain, France and Spain, with Portugal in agreement. The British offered France the choice of surrendering either its continental North American possessions east of the Mississippi or the Caribbean islands ofGuadeloupeandMartinique,which had been occupied by the British. France chose to cede the former but was able to negotiate the retention ofSaint Pierre and Miquelon,two small islands in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, along with fishing rights in the area. They viewed the economic value of the Caribbean islands' sugar cane to be greater and easier to defend than the furs from the continent. French philosopherVoltairereferred to Canada disparagingly as nothing more thana few acres of snow.The British, however, were happy to take New France, as defence of their North American colonies would no longer be an issue (though the absence of that threat caused many colonists to conclude they no longer needed British protection). Britain also had ample places from which to obtain sugar. Spain traded Florida to Britain in order to regain Cuba, but they also gained Louisiana from France, including New Orleans, in compensation for their losses. Great Britain and Spain also agreed that navigation on theMississippi Riverwas to be open to vessels of all nations.[75]

Consequences

The resulting peace dramatically changed the political landscape of North America, withNew Franceceded to the British and the Spanish.

The war changed economic, political, governmental, and social relations among the three European powers, their colonies, and the people who inhabited those territories. France and Britain both suffered financially because of the war, with significant long-term consequences.

Britain gained control ofFrench Canadaand Acadia, colonies containing approximately 80,000 primarily French-speaking Roman Catholic residents. Thedeportation of Acadiansbeginning in 1755 made land available to immigrants from Europe and migrants from the colonies to the south. The British resettled many Acadians throughout its American provinces, but many went to France and some went to New Orleans, which they expected to remain French. Some were sent to colonize places as diverse asFrench Guianaand theFalkland Islands,but these efforts were unsuccessful. The Louisiana population contributed to founding theCajunpopulation. (The French word "Acadien" changed to "Cadien" then to "Cajun".)[76]

King George IIIissued theRoyal Proclamation of 1763on October 7, 1763, which outlined the division and administration of the newly conquered territory, and it continues to govern relations to some extent between the government of Canada and theFirst Nations.Included in its provisions was the reservation of lands west of theAppalachian Mountainsto its Indian population,[77]a demarcation that was only a temporary impediment to a rising tide of westward-bound settlers.[78]The proclamation also contained provisions that prevented civic participation by the Roman Catholic Canadians.[79]

A copy of theQuebec Actpassed in 1774 which addressed a number of grievances held by French Canadians and Indians, although it angered American colonists

TheQuebec Actof 1774 addressed issues brought forth by Roman Catholic French Canadians from the 1763 proclamation, and it transferred theIndian Reserveinto theProvince of Quebec.The Act maintained French Civil law, including theseigneurial system,a medieval code removed from France within a generation by theFrench Revolution.The Quebec Act was a major concern for the largely ProtestantThirteen Coloniesover the advance of "popery". It is typically associated with otherIntolerable Acts,legislation that eventually led to theAmerican Revolutionary War.The Quebec Act served as the constitutional document for the Province of Quebec until it was superseded by theConstitutional Act 1791.

The Seven Years' War nearly doubled Great Britain's national debt. The Crown sought sources of revenue to pay it off and attempted to impose new taxes on its colonies. These attempts were met with increasingly stiff resistance, until troops were called in to enforce the Crown's authority, and they ultimately led to the start of theAmerican Revolutionary War.[80]France attached comparatively little value to its American possessions, apart from the highly profitable sugar-producingAntillesislands which it retained. MinisterChoiseulconsidered that he had made a good deal at the Treaty of Paris, andVoltairewrote that Louis XV had losta few acres of snow.[81]However, the military defeat and the financial burden of the war weakened the French monarchy and contributed to the advent of theFrench Revolutionin 1789.[82]

The elimination of French power in America meant the disappearance of a strong ally for some Indian tribes.[82]The Ohio Country was now more available to colonial settlement due to the construction of military roads by Braddock and Forbes.[83]The Spanish takeover of the Louisiana territory was not completed until 1769, and it had modest repercussions. The British takeover of Spanish Florida resulted in the westward migration of Indian tribes who did not want to do business with them. This migration also caused a rise in tensions between the Choctaw and the Creek, historic enemies who were competing for land.[84]The change of control in Florida also prompted most of its Spanish Catholic population to leave. Most went to Cuba, although some ChristianizedYamaseewere resettled to the coast of Mexico.[85]

France returned to America in 1778 with the establishment of aFranco-American allianceagainst Great Britain in theAmerican Revolutionary War,in what historianAlfred A. Cavedescribes as French "revenge for Montcalm's death".[86]

See also

Footnotes

  1. ^Brumwell, pp. 26–31, documents the starting sizes of the expeditions against Louisbourg, Carillon, Duquesne, and West Indies.
  2. ^Brumwell, pp. 24–25.
  3. ^Clodfelter, M. (2017). Warfare and Armed Conflicts: A Statistical Encyclopedia of Casualty and Other Figures, 1492–2015 (4th ed.). Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland.ISBN978-0786474707,p 122
  4. ^Gary Walton; History of the American Economy; page 27
  5. ^"French and Indian War".American History USA.RetrievedJuly 7,2021.
  6. ^M. Brook Taylor,Canadian History: a Reader's Guide: Volume 1: Beginnings to Confederation(1994) pp 39–48, 72–74
  7. ^ab"Seven Years' War".The Canadian Encyclopedia.RetrievedOctober 7,2019.:1756–1763
  8. ^"The Siege of Quebec: An episode of the Seven Years' War",Canadian National Battlefields Commission, Plains of Abraham website
  9. ^Hall, Richard (2016). "The Causes of the French and Indian War and the Origins of the" Braddock Plan ": Rival Colonies and Their Claims to the Disputed Ohio".Atlantic Politics, Military Strategy and the French and Indian War.War, Culture and Society, 1750-1850. pp. 21–49.doi:10.1007/978-3-319-30665-0_2.ISBN978-3-319-30664-3.
  10. ^Peyser.Jacques Legardeur de Saint-Pierre: Officer, Gentleman, Entrepreneur.Michigan State University Press. p. 221.
  11. ^Eccles,France in America,p. 185
  12. ^abcAnderson (2000), p. 747.
  13. ^Jennings, p. xv.
  14. ^Brian Young (2012)."Below the Academic Radar: Denis Vaugeois and Constructing the Conquest in the Quebec Popular Imagination".In John G. Reid (ed.).Remembering 1759: The Conquest of Canada in Historical Memory.University of Toronto Press. pp. 233–.ISBN978-1-4426-9924-3.
  15. ^Powell, John (2005).Encyclopedia of North American immigration.New York: Facts on File. p.204.ISBN0816046581.
  16. ^John Wade, "British History Chronologically Arranged, 2: Comprehending a Chamfied Analysis of Events and Occurencis in Church and State... from the First Invasions by the Romans to A.d. 1847", p.46[1]
  17. ^Cogliano, Francis D. (2008).Revolutionary America, 1763–1815: A Political History.London: Routledge. p. 32.ISBN9780415964869.
  18. ^Jennings, pp. 9, 176
  19. ^Anderson (2000), p. 23
  20. ^Bleiweis, Sam (2013)."The Downfall of the Iroquios"(PDF).Emory Endeavors in World History.5:84–99.Archived(PDF)from the original on October 9, 2022.
  21. ^Jennings, p. 8
  22. ^Hamer, P. M. (July 1925)."Anglo-French Rivalry in the Cherokee Country, 1754-1757".The North Carolina Historical Review.2(3). North Carolina Office of Archives and History: 303–322.ISSN0029-2494.JSTOR23514555.OCLC9973993536.RetrievedMarch 29,2024.
  23. ^Corbett, Theodore G. (1976)."Population Structure in Hispanic St. Augustine, 1629–1763".The Florida Historical Quarterly.54(3). Florida Historical Society: 264.JSTOR30151286.
  24. ^abcAnderson (2000), p. 26.
  25. ^abFowler, p. 14.
  26. ^ab"Park Spotlight: Lake Loramie"Archived2013-10-17 at theWayback Machine,Ohio State Parks Magazine,Spring 2006
  27. ^Fowler, p. 15.
  28. ^Alfred P. James,The Ohio Company: Its Inner History(1959) pp. 26–40
  29. ^Jennings, p. 15
  30. ^Jennings, p. 18
  31. ^Anderson (2000), p. 28
  32. ^Anderson (2000), p. 27
  33. ^Fowler, p. 31.
  34. ^O'Meara, p. 48
  35. ^Anderson (2000), pp. 42–43
  36. ^Anderson (2000), p. 43
  37. ^Jennings, p. 63
  38. ^Fowler, p. 35.
  39. ^Ellis,His Excellency George Washington,p. 5.
  40. ^Fowler, p. 36.
  41. ^O'Meara, pp. 37–38.
  42. ^O'Meara, p. 41
  43. ^O'Meara, pp. 43–45
  44. ^Jennings, p. 65
  45. ^Anderson (2000), p. 50
  46. ^Anderson, Fred (200).Crucible of War.Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. pp. 52–53.ISBN9780307425393.
  47. ^Anderson (2000), pp. 51–59.
  48. ^Anderson (2000), pp. 59–65.
  49. ^Fowler, p. 52.
  50. ^Lengel p. 52.
  51. ^O'Meara, p. 113.
  52. ^Fowler, pp. 74–75.
  53. ^abFowler, p. 98.
  54. ^ab"The Battle of the Monongahela".World Digital Library.1755.RetrievedAugust 3,2013.
  55. ^O'Meara, pp. 110–111.
  56. ^O'Meara, p. 163.
  57. ^An act for the speedy and effectual recruiting of his Majesty's land forces and marines.,p.318
  58. ^An act to enable his Majesty to grant commissions to a certain number of foreign Protestants who have served abroad as officers, or engineers, to act and rank as officers, or engineers, in America only, under certain restrictions and qualifications.,p.331
  59. ^An act for the better supply of mariners and seamen to serve in his Majesty's ships of war, and on board merchant ships, and other trading ships and vessels.,p.370
  60. ^An act for extending (the Navy Act 1748, 22 Geo. 2 c. 33) (for amending, explaining, and reducing into one act of parliament the laws relating to the government of his Majesty's ships, vessels and forces by sea) to such officers, seamen, and others, as shall serve on board his Majesty's ships or vessels employed upon the lakes, great waters, or rivers, in North America.,p.457
  61. ^An act for the encouragement of seamen, and the more effectual manning of his Majesty's navy.p.481
  62. ^Patterson, Stephen E. (1994). "1744–1763: Colonial Wars and Aboriginal Peoples". In Buckner, Phillip; Reid, John (eds.).The Atlantic Region to Confederation: A History.Toronto: University of Toronto Press. p. 152.ISBN0802005535.
  63. ^Nester, pp. 53–61
  64. ^Fowler, p. 138.
  65. ^Fowler, p. 139.
  66. ^Anderson, Fred (2000).Crucible of War: The Seven Years' War and the Fate of Empire in British North America, 1754–1766.New York: Alfred A. Knopf. pp.267–285.ISBN0375406425.
  67. ^William, Wood,The Great Fortress: A Chronicle of Louisbourg 1720–1760([2]Online fromProject Gutenberg)
  68. ^Anderson (2000), p. 498
  69. ^Cave, p. 21
  70. ^"Treaty of Paris February 10, 1763".FrenchandIndianWar.info.RetrievedJanuary 21,2015.
  71. ^Jennings, p. 439
  72. ^Anderson (2000), pp. 617–632
  73. ^Karamanski, Theodore J. (2012).Blackbird's song: Andrew J. Blackbird and the Odawa people.East Lansing: Michigan State University Press. pp. 6–7.ISBN978-1-61186-050-4.
  74. ^Otto, Simon; Cappel, Constance (2007).The smallpox genocide of the Odawa tribe at L'Arbre Croche, 1763: the history of a Native American people.Lewiston, New York:Edwin Mellen Press.ISBN978-0-7734-5220-6.
  75. ^Anderson (2000), pp. 505–506
  76. ^Calloway, pp. 161–164
  77. ^Anderson (2000), pp. 565–566
  78. ^Anderson (2000), pp. 636–637
  79. ^Anderson (2000), p. 568
  80. ^Anderson, Fred. "The Real First World War and the Making of AmericaArchived2010-01-31 at theWayback Machine"American Heritage,November/December 2005.
  81. ^Cave, p. 52
  82. ^abCave, p. xii
  83. ^Anderson (2000), p. 525
  84. ^Calloway, pp. 133–138
  85. ^Calloway, pp. 152–156
  86. ^Cave, p. 82

Bibliography

External links