Jump to content

Genomic imprinting

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromImprinting disorder)

Genomic imprintingis anepigeneticphenomenon that causesgenesto beexpressedor not, depending on whether they are inherited from the female or male parent.[1][2][3][4][5]Genes can also be partially imprinted. Partial imprinting occurs whenallelesfrom both parents are differently expressed rather than complete expression and complete suppression of one parent's allele.[6]Forms of genomic imprinting have been demonstrated in fungi, plants and animals.[7][8]In 2014, there were about 150 imprinted genes known in mice and about half that in humans.[9]As of 2019, 260 imprinted genes have been reported in mice and 228 in humans.[10]

Genomic imprinting is an inheritance process independent of the classicalMendelian inheritance.[11]It is an epigenetic process that involvesDNA methylationandhistone methylationwithout altering the genetic sequence. These epigenetic marks are established ( "imprinted" ) in thegermline(sperm or egg cells) of the parents and are maintained throughmitoticcell divisions in thesomatic cellsof an organism.[12]

Appropriate imprinting of certain genes is important for normal development. Human diseases involving genomic imprinting includeAngelman,Prader–Willi,andBeckwith–Wiedemannsyndromes.[13]Methylation defects have also been associated with maleinfertility.[3]

Overview

[edit]

Indiploidorganisms (like humans), the somatic cells possess two copies of thegenome,one inherited from the male and one from the female. Eachautosomalgene is therefore represented by two copies, or alleles, with one copy inherited from each parent atfertilization.The expressed allele is dependent upon its parental origin. For example, the gene encodinginsulin-like growth factor 2(IGF2/Igf2) is only expressed from the allele inherited from the male. Although imprinting accounts for a small proportion of mammalian genes, they play an important role in embryogenesis particularly in the formation of visceral structures and the nervous system.[14]

The term "imprinting" was first used to describe events in the insectPseudococcus nipae.[15]InPseudococcids(mealybugs) (Hemiptera,Coccoidea) both the male and female develop from a fertilised egg. In females, all chromosomes remaineuchromaticand functional. In embryos destined to become males, onehaploidset of chromosomes becomesheterochromatinisedafter the sixth cleavage division and remains so in most tissues; males are thus functionally haploid.[16][17][18]

Imprinted genes in mammals

[edit]

That imprinting might be a feature of mammalian development was suggested in breeding experiments in mice carrying reciprocalchromosomal translocations.[19]Nucleus transplantation experiments inmousezygotes in the early 1980s confirmed that normal development requires the contribution of both the maternal and paternal genomes. The vast majority of mouse embryos derived fromparthenogenesis(called parthenogenones, with two maternal or egg genomes) andandrogenesis(called androgenones, with two paternal or sperm genomes) die at or before the blastocyst/implantation stage. In the rare instances that they develop to postimplantation stages, gynogenetic embryos show better embryonic development relative to placental development, while for androgenones, the reverse is true. Nevertheless, for the latter, only a few have been described (in a 1984 paper).[20][21][22]Nevertheless, in 2018 genome editing allowed for bipaternal and viable bimaternal[23][24]mouse and even (in 2022) parthenogenesis, still this is far from full reimprinting.[25]Finally in March 2023 viable bipaternal embryos were created.[26]

No naturally occurring cases of parthenogenesis exist in mammals because of imprinted genes. However, in 2004, experimental manipulation by Japanese researchers of a paternal methylation imprint controlling theIgf2gene led to the birth of a mouse (namedKaguya) with two maternal sets of chromosomes, though it is not a true parthenogenone since cells from two different female mice were used. The researchers were able to succeed by using one egg from an immature parent, thus reducing maternal imprinting, and modifying it to express the gene Igf2, which is normally only expressed by the paternal copy of the gene.

Parthenogenetic/gynogenetic embryos have twice the normal expression level of maternally derived genes, and lack expression of paternally expressed genes, while the reverse is true for androgenetic embryos. It is now known that there are at least 80 imprinted genes in humans and mice, many of which are involved in embryonic and placental growth and development.[12][27][28][29]Hybridoffspring of two species may exhibit unusual growth due to the novel combination of imprinted genes.[30]

Various methods have been used to identify imprinted genes. In swine, Bischoffet al.compared transcriptional profiles usingDNA microarraysto survey differentially expressed genes between parthenotes (2 maternal genomes) and control fetuses (1 maternal, 1 paternal genome).[31]An intriguing study surveying thetranscriptomeofmurinebrain tissues revealed over 1300 imprinted gene loci (approximately 10-fold more than previously reported) by RNA-sequencing from F1 hybrids resulting from reciprocal crosses.[32]The result however has been challenged by others who claimed that this is an overestimation by an order of magnitude due to flawed statistical analysis.[33][34]

In domesticated livestock,single-nucleotide polymorphismsin imprinted genes influencingfoetalgrowth and development have been shown to be associated with economically important production traits in cattle, sheep and pigs.[35][36]

Genetic mapping of imprinted genes

[edit]

At the same time as the generation of the gynogenetic and androgenetic embryos discussed above, mouse embryos were also being generated that contained only small regions that were derived from either a paternal or maternal source.[37][38]The generation of a series of suchuniparental disomies,which together span the entire genome, allowed the creation of an imprinting map.[39]Those regions which when inherited from a single parent result in a discernible phenotype contain imprinted gene(s). Further research showed that within these regions there were often numerous imprinted genes.[40]Around 80% of imprinted genes are found in clusters such as these, called imprinted domains, suggesting a level of co-ordinated control.[5]More recently, genome-wide screens to identify imprinted genes have used differential expression of mRNAs from control fetuses and parthenogenetic or androgenetic fetuses hybridized togene expression profilingmicroarrays,[41]allele-specific gene expression usingSNP genotypingmicroarrays,[42]transcriptome sequencing,[43]and in silico prediction pipelines.[44]

Imprinting mechanisms

[edit]

Imprinting is a dynamic process. It must be possible to erase and re-establish imprints through each generation so that genes that are imprinted in an adult may still be expressed in that adult's offspring. (For example, the maternal genes that control insulin production will be imprinted in a male but will be expressed in any of the male's offspring that inherit these genes.) The nature of imprinting must therefore beepigeneticrather than DNA sequence dependent. Ingermlinecells the imprint is erased and then re-established according to thesexof the individual, i.e. in the developing sperm (duringspermatogenesis), a paternal imprint is established, whereas in developing oocytes (oogenesis), a maternal imprint is established. This process of erasure andreprogramming[45]is necessary such that the germ cell imprinting status is relevant to the sex of the individual. In both plants and mammals there are two major mechanisms that are involved in establishing the imprint; these areDNA methylationandhistonemodifications.

Recently, a new study[46]has suggested a novel inheritable imprinting mechanism in humans that would be specific ofplacentaltissue and that is independent of DNA methylation (the main and classical mechanism for genomic imprinting). This was observed in humans, but not in mice, suggesting development after the evolutionary divergence of humans and mice, ~80Mya.Among the hypothetical explanations for this novel phenomenon, two possible mechanisms have been proposed: either a histone modification that confers imprinting at novel placental-specific imprintedlocior, alternatively, a recruitment ofDNMTsto these loci by a specific and unknowntranscription factorthat would be expressed during early trophoblast differentiation.

Regulation

[edit]

The grouping of imprinted genes within clusters allows them to share common regulatory elements, such asnon-coding RNAsanddifferentially methylated regions (DMRs).When these regulatory elements control the imprinting of one or more genes, they are known as imprinting control regions (ICR). The expression ofnon-coding RNAs,such asantisense Igf2r RNA(Air) on mouse chromosome 17 andKCNQ1OT1on human chromosome 11p15.5, have been shown to be essential for the imprinting of genes in their corresponding regions.[47]

Differentially methylated regions are generally segments of DNA rich incytosineandguaninenucleotides, with the cytosine nucleotides methylated on one copy but not on the other. Contrary to expectation, methylation does not necessarily mean silencing; instead, the effect of methylation depends upon the default state of the region.[48]

Functions of imprinted genes

[edit]

The control of expression of specific genes by genomic imprinting is unique totherianmammals (placental mammalsandmarsupials) and flowering plants. Imprinting of whole chromosomes has been reported in mealybugs (Genus:Pseudococcus)[15][16][17][18]and afungus gnat(Sciara).[49]It has also been established thatX-chromosomeinactivation occurs in an imprinted manner in the extra-embryonic tissues of mice and all tissues in marsupials, where it is always the paternal X-chromosome which is silenced.[5][50]

The majority of imprinted genes in mammals have been found to have roles in the control of embryonic growth and development, including development of the placenta.[27][51]Other imprinted genes are involved in post-natal development, with roles affecting suckling and metabolism.[51][52]

Hypotheses on the origins of imprinting

[edit]

A widely accepted hypothesis for the evolution of genomic imprinting is the "parental conflict hypothesis".[53]Also known as the kinship theory of genomic imprinting, this hypothesis states that the inequality between parental genomes due to imprinting is a result of thediffering interests of each parentin terms of theevolutionary fitness of their genes.[54][55]Thefather's genes that encode for imprinting gain greater fitness through the success of the offspring, at the expense of themother.The mother's evolutionary imperative is often to conserve resources for her own survival while providing sufficient nourishment to current and subsequent litters. Accordingly, paternally expressed genes tend to be growth-promoting whereas maternally expressed genes tend to be growth-limiting.[53]In support of this hypothesis, genomic imprinting has been found in all placental mammals, where post-fertilisation offspring resource consumption at the expense of the mother is high; although it has also been found inoviparousbirds[56][57]where there is relatively little post-fertilisation resource transfer and therefore less parental conflict. A small number of imprinted genes are fast evolving under positive Darwinian selection possibly due to antagonistic co-evolution.[58]The majority of imprinted genes display high levels of micro-syntenyconservation and have undergone very few duplications in placental mammalian lineages.[58]

However, our understanding of the molecular mechanisms behind genomic imprinting show that it is the maternal genome that controls much of the imprinting of both its own and the paternally-derived genes in the zygote, making it difficult to explain why the maternal genes would willingly relinquish their dominance to that of the paternally-derived genes in light of the conflict hypothesis.[59]

Another hypothesis proposed is that some imprinted genes act coadaptively to improve both fetal development and maternal provisioning for nutrition and care.[9][59][60]In it, a subset of paternally expressed genes are co-expressed in both the placenta and the mother's hypothalamus. This would come about through selective pressure from parent-infant coadaptation to improve infant survival. Paternally expressed 3 (PEG3) is a gene for which this hypothesis may apply.[9]

Others have approached their study of the origins of genomic imprinting from a different side, arguing thatnatural selectionis operating on the role of epigenetic marks as machinery for homologous chromosome recognition during meiosis, rather than on their role in differential expression.[61]This argument centers on the existence of epigenetic effects on chromosomes that do not directly affect gene expression, but do depend on which parent the chromosome originated from.[62]This group of epigenetic changes that depend on the chromosome's parent of origin (including both those that affect gene expression and those that do not) are called parental origin effects, and include phenomena such as paternalX inactivationin themarsupials,nonrandom parentalchromatiddistribution in the ferns, and even mating type switching in yeast.[62]This diversity in organisms that show parental origin effects has prompted theorists to place the evolutionary origin of genomic imprinting before the last common ancestor of plants and animals, over a billion years ago.[61]

Natural selection for genomic imprinting requires genetic variation in a population. A hypothesis for the origin of this genetic variation states that the host-defense system responsible for silencing foreign DNA elements, such as genes of viral origin, mistakenly silenced genes whose silencing turned out to be beneficial for the organism.[63]There appears to be an over-representation ofretrotransposed genes,that is to say genes that are inserted into the genome byviruses,among imprinted genes. It has also been postulated that if the retrotransposed gene is inserted close to another imprinted gene, it may just acquire this imprint.[64]

Imprinted loci phenotypic signatures

[edit]

Unfortunately, the relationship between the phenotype and genotype of imprinted genes is solely conceptual. The idea is frameworked using two alleles on a single locus and hosts three different possible classes of genotypes.[65]The reciprocal heterozygotes genotype class contributes to understanding how imprinting will impact genotype to phenotype relationship. Reciprocal heterozygotes have a genetically equivalent, but they are phenotypically nonequivalent.[66]Their phenotype may not be dependent on the equivalence of the genotype. This can ultimately increase diversity in genetic classes, expanding flexibility of imprinted genes.[67]This increase will also force a higher degree in testing capabilities and assortment of tests to determine the presences of imprinting.

When a locus is identified as imprinted, two different classes express different alleles.[65]Inherited imprinted genes of offspring are believed to be monoallelic expressions. A single locus will entirely produce one's phenotype although two alleles are inherited. This genotype class is called parental imprinting, as well as dominant imprinting.[68]Phenotypic patterns are variant to possible expressions from paternal and maternal genotypes. Different alleles inherited from different parents will host different phenotypic qualities. One allele will have a larger phenotypic value and the other allele will be silenced.[65]Underdominance of the locus is another possibility of phenotypic expression. Both maternal and paternal phenotypes will have a small value rather than one hosting a large value and silencing the other.

Statistical frameworks and mapping models are used to identify imprinting effects on genes and complex traits. Allelic parent-of-origin influences the vary in phenotype that derive from the imprinting of genotype classes.[65]These models of mapping and identifying imprinting effects include using unordered genotypes to build mapping models.[67]These models will show classic quantitative genetics and the effects of dominance of the imprinted genes.

Human disorders associated with imprinting

[edit]

Imprinting may cause problems incloning,with clones having DNA that is notmethylatedin the correct positions. It is possible that this is due to a lack of time for reprogramming to be completely achieved. When anucleusis added to an egg duringsomatic cell nuclear transfer,the egg starts dividing in minutes, as compared to the days or months it takes for reprogramming duringembryonicdevelopment. If time is the responsible factor, it may be possible to delay cell division in clones, giving time for proper reprogramming to occur.[citation needed]

An allele of the "callipyge" (from theGreekfor "beautiful buttocks" ), or CLPG, gene insheepproduces large buttocks consisting of muscle with very little fat. The large-buttocked phenotype only occurs when the allele is present on the copy of chromosome 18 inherited from a sheep's father and isnoton the copy of chromosome 18 inherited from that sheep's mother.[69]

In vitro fertilisation,includingICSI,is associated with an increased risk of imprinting disorders, with anodds ratioof 3.7 (95%confidence interval1.4 to 9.7).[70]

Male infertility

[edit]

Epigenetic deregulations atH19imprinted gene in sperm have been observed associated with maleinfertility.[71]Indeed, methylation loss at H19 imprinted gene has been observed associated withMTHFRgene promoterhypermethylationin semen samples frominfertilemales.[71]

Prader-Willi/Angelman

[edit]

The first imprintedgenetic disordersto be described in humans were the reciprocally inheritedPrader-Willi syndromeandAngelman syndrome.Both syndromes are associated with loss of the chromosomal region 15q11-13 (band 11 of the long arm of chromosome 15). This region contains the paternally expressed genesSNRPNandNDNand the maternally expressed geneUBE3A.

Potential involvement in autism and schizophrenia

[edit]
This section is an excerpt fromImprinted brain hypothesis.[edit]
Bernard Crespi, the primary originator of the hypothesis, in 2016

Theimprinted brain hypothesisis an unsubstantiatedhypothesisinevolutionary psychologyregarding the causes ofautism spectrumandschizophrenia spectrum disorders,first presented byBernard CrespiandChristopher Badcockin 2008. It claims that certain autistic andschizotypaltraits are opposites, and that this implies theetiologyof the two conditions must be at odds.

The imprinted brain hypothesis is based around genomic imprinting, anepigeneticprocess through which genes areexpresseddifferently by way of one parent's contribution having more effect than the other. Specifically, proponents of the imprinted brain hypothesis propose that autism spectrum disorders are caused by paternal overimprinting, while schizophrenia spectrum disorders are caused by maternal overimprinting; they point to a number of supposedcorrelationsand anticorrelations seen between the disorders and other traits to support the hypothesis.

While the hypothesis has found some attention inpopular science,it lacks scientific backing.[72][73]It has also been attacked asunfalsifiable,exaggerated, and overly broad.[74]Specific issues for the hypothesis include that the predictions it makes about genetic disorders are falsified, that the effects of the two disorders on empathy andmentalizingare contrary to Crespi and Badcock's model, and that many neuroimaging findings fail to support the hypothesis.

DIRAS3 (NOEY2 or ARH1)

[edit]

DIRAS3is a paternally expressed and maternally imprinted gene located on chromosome 1 in humans. Reduced DIRAS3 expression is linked to an increased risk of ovarian and breast cancers; in 41% of breast and ovarian cancers the protein encoded by DIRAS3 is not expressed, suggesting that it functions as atumor suppressor gene.[75]Therefore, if uniparental disomy occurs and a person inherits both chromosomes from the mother, the gene will not be expressed and the individual is put at a greater risk for breast and ovarian cancer.

Other

[edit]

Other conditions involving imprinting includeBeckwith-Wiedemann syndrome,Silver-Russell syndrome,andpseudohypoparathyroidism.[76]

Transient neonatal diabetes mellituscan also involve imprinting.[77]

The "imprinted brain hypothesis"argues that unbalanced imprinting may be a cause ofautismandpsychosis.

Imprinted genes in other animals

[edit]

In insects, imprinting affects entire chromosomes. In some insects the entire paternal genome is silenced in male offspring, and thus is involved in sex determination. The imprinting produces effects similar to the mechanisms in other insects that eliminate paternally inherited chromosomes in male offspring, includingarrhenotoky.[78]

In social honey bees, the parent of origin and allele-specific genes has been studied from reciprocal crosses to explore the epigenetic mechanisms underlying aggressive behavior.[79]

In placental species, parent-offspring conflict can result in the evolution of strategies, such as genomic imprinting, for embryos to subvert maternal nutrient provisioning. Despite several attempts to find it, genomic imprinting has not been found in the platypus, reptiles, birds, or fish. The absence of genomic imprinting in a placental reptile, thePseudemoia entrecasteauxii,is interesting as genomic imprinting was thought to be associated with the evolution of viviparity and placental nutrient transport.[80]

Studies in domestic livestock, such as dairy and beef cattle, have implicated imprinted genes (e.g. IGF2) in a range of economic traits,[81][82][35]including dairy performance in Holstein-Friesian cattle.[83]

Mouse foraging behavior

[edit]

Foraging behavior in mice studied is influenced by a sexually dimorphic allele expression implicating a cross-gender imprinting influence that varies throughout the body and may dominate expression and shape a behavior.[84][85]

Imprinted genes in plants

[edit]

A similar imprinting phenomenon has also been described inflowering plants(angiosperms).[86]During fertilization of the egg cell, a second, separate fertilization event gives rise to theendosperm,an extraembryonic structure that nourishes the embryo in a manner analogous to the mammalianplacenta.Unlike the embryo, the endosperm is often formed from the fusion of two maternal cells with a malegamete.This results in atriploidgenome. The 2:1 ratio of maternal to paternal genomes appears to be critical for seed development. Some genes are found to be expressed from both maternal genomes while others are expressed exclusively from the lone paternal copy.[87]It has been suggested that these imprinted genes are responsible for thetriploid blockeffect in flowering plants that prevents hybridization between diploids and autotetraploids.[88]Several computational methods to detect imprinting genes in plants from reciprocal crosses have been proposed.[89][90][91]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Ferguson-Smith AC(July 2011). "Genomic imprinting: the emergence of an epigenetic paradigm".Nature Reviews. Genetics.12(8): 565–575.doi:10.1038/nrg3032.PMID21765458.S2CID23630392.Closed access icon
  2. ^Bartolomei MS(September 2009)."Genomic imprinting: employing and avoiding epigenetic processes".Genes & Development.23(18): 2124–2133.doi:10.1101/gad.1841409.PMC2751984.PMID19759261.
  3. ^abRotondo JC, Selvatici R, Di Domenico M, Marci R, Vesce F, Tognon M, Martini F (September 2013)."Methylation loss at H19 imprinted gene correlates with methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene promoter hypermethylation in semen samples from infertile males".Epigenetics.8(9): 990–997.doi:10.4161/epi.25798.PMC3883776.PMID23975186.
  4. ^Patten MM, Ross L, Curley JP, Queller DC, Bonduriansky R, Wolf JB (August 2014)."The evolution of genomic imprinting: theories, predictions and empirical tests".Heredity.113(2): 119–128.doi:10.1038/hdy.2014.29.PMC4105453.PMID24755983.
  5. ^abcReik W;Walter J (January 2001). "Genomic imprinting: parental influence on the genome".Nature Reviews. Genetics.2(1): 21–32.doi:10.1038/35047554.PMID11253064.S2CID12050251.
  6. ^Morcos L, Ge B, Koka V, Lam KC, Pokholok DK, Gunderson KL, et al. (2011)."Genome-wide assessment of imprinted expression in human cells".Genome Biology.12(3): R25.doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-3-r25.PMC3129675.PMID21418647.
  7. ^Martienssen RA, Colot V (August 2001). "DNA methylation and epigenetic inheritance in plants and filamentous fungi".Science.293(5532): 1070–1074.doi:10.1126/science.293.5532.1070.PMID11498574.
  8. ^Feil R, Berger F (April 2007). "Convergent evolution of genomic imprinting in plants and mammals".Trends in Genetics.23(4): 192–199.doi:10.1016/j.tig.2007.02.004.PMID17316885.
  9. ^abcPeters J (August 2014). "The role of genomic imprinting in biology and disease: an expanding view".Nature Reviews. Genetics.15(8): 517–530.doi:10.1038/nrg3766.PMID24958438.S2CID498562.
  10. ^Tucci V; Isles AR; Kelsey G;Ferguson-Smith AC(February 2019)."Genomic Imprinting and Physiological Processes in Mammals".Cell.176(5): 952–965.doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.043.PMID30794780.
  11. ^Preston, Elizabeth (13 February 2024)."Self-Love Is Important, but We Mammals Are Stuck With Sex - Some female birds, reptiles and other animals can make a baby on their own. But for mammals like us, eggs and sperm need each other".The New York Times.Archivedfrom the original on 13 February 2024.Retrieved16 February2024.
  12. ^abWood AJ, Oakey RJ (November 2006)."Genomic imprinting in mammals: emerging themes and established theories".PLOS Genetics.2(11): e147.doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020147.PMC1657038.PMID17121465.
  13. ^"Can you generate offspring from two eggs?".27 December 2021.
  14. ^Butler MG (October 2009)."Genomic imprinting disorders in humans: a mini-review".Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.26(9–10): 477–486.doi:10.1007/s10815-009-9353-3.PMC2788689.PMID19844787.
  15. ^abSchrader F (1921)."The chromosomes inPseudococcus nipæ".Biological Bulletin.40(5): 259–270.doi:10.2307/1536736.JSTOR1536736.Retrieved2008-07-01.
  16. ^abBrown SW, Nur U (July 1964). "Heterochromatic Chromosomes in the Coccids".Science.145(3628): 130–136.Bibcode:1964Sci...145..130B.doi:10.1126/science.145.3628.130.PMID14171547.
  17. ^abHughes-Schrader S(1948).Cytology of Coccids (Coccoïdea-Homoptera).Advances in Genetics. Vol. 35. pp. 127–203.doi:10.1016/S0065-2660(08)60468-X.ISBN9780120176021.PMID18103373.
  18. ^abNur U (1990). "Heterochromatization and euchromatization of whole genomes in scale insects (Coccoidea: Homoptera)".Development.108:29–34.doi:10.1242/dev.108.Supplement.29.PMID2090427.
  19. ^Lyon MF, Glenister PH (February 1977)."Factors affecting the observed number of young resulting from adjacent-2 disjunction in mice carrying a translocation".Genetical Research.29(1): 83–92.doi:10.1017/S0016672300017134.PMID559611.
  20. ^Barton SC,Surani MA,Norris ML (1984). "Role of paternal and maternal genomes in mouse development".Nature.311(5984): 374–376.Bibcode:1984Natur.311..374B.doi:10.1038/311374a0.PMID6482961.S2CID4321070.Closed access icon
  21. ^Mann JR, Lovell-Badge RH (1984). "Inviability of parthenogenones is determined by pronuclei, not egg cytoplasm".Nature.310(5972): 66–67.Bibcode:1984Natur.310...66M.doi:10.1038/310066a0.PMID6738704.S2CID4336389.
  22. ^McGrath J, Solter D (May 1984)."Completion of mouse embryogenesis requires both the maternal and paternal genomes".Cell.37(1): 179–183.doi:10.1016/0092-8674(84)90313-1.PMID6722870.
  23. ^Sagi I, Bar S, Benvenisty N (November 2018)."Mice from Same-Sex Parents: CRISPRing Out the Barriers for Unisexual Reproduction".Cell Stem Cell.23(5): 625–627.doi:10.1016/j.stem.2018.10.012.PMID30388415.S2CID53252140.
  24. ^Li ZK, Wang LY, Wang LB, Feng GH, Yuan XW, Liu C, et al. (November 2018)."Generation of Bimaternal and Bipaternal Mice from Hypomethylated Haploid ESCs with Imprinting Region Deletions".Cell Stem Cell.23(5): 665–676.e4.doi:10.1016/j.stem.2018.09.004.PMID30318303.S2CID205251810.
  25. ^Wei Y, Yang CR, Zhao ZA (March 2022)."Viable offspring derived from single unfertilized mammalian oocytes".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.119(12): e2115248119.Bibcode:2022PNAS..11915248W.doi:10.1073/pnas.2115248119.PMC8944925.PMID35254875.
  26. ^Ledford, Heidi; Kozlov, Max (2023-03-09)."The mice with two dads: scientists create eggs from male cells".Nature.615(7952): 379–380.Bibcode:2023Natur.615..379L.doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00717-7.PMID36894725.S2CID257428648.
  27. ^abIsles AR, Holland AJ (January 2005). "Imprinted genes and mother-offspring interactions".Early Human Development.81(1): 73–77.doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2004.10.006.PMID15707717.
  28. ^Morison IM, Ramsay JP, Spencer HG (August 2005). "A census of mammalian imprinting".Trends in Genetics.21(8): 457–465.doi:10.1016/j.tig.2005.06.008.PMID15990197.
  29. ^Reik W;Lewis A (May 2005). "Co-evolution of X-chromosome inactivation and imprinting in mammals".Nature Reviews. Genetics.6(5): 403–410.doi:10.1038/nrg1602.PMID15818385.S2CID21091004.
  30. ^"Gene Tug-of-War Leads to Distinct Species".Howard Hughes Medical Institute.2000-04-30. Archived fromthe originalon 2013-03-28.Retrieved2008-07-02.
  31. ^Bischoff SR, Tsai S, Hardison N, Motsinger-Reif AA, Freking BA, Nonneman D, et al. (November 2009)."Characterization of conserved and nonconserved imprinted genes in swine".Biology of Reproduction.81(5): 906–920.doi:10.1095/biolreprod.109.078139.PMC2770020.PMID19571260.
  32. ^Gregg C, Zhang J, Weissbourd B, Luo S, Schroth GP, Haig D, Dulac C (August 2010)."High-resolution analysis of parent-of-origin allelic expression in the mouse brain".Science.329(5992): 643–648.Bibcode:2010Sci...329..643G.doi:10.1126/science.1190830.PMC3005244.PMID20616232.
  33. ^Hayden EC (April 2012)."RNA studies under fire".Nature.484(7395): 428.Bibcode:2012Natur.484..428C.doi:10.1038/484428a.PMID22538578.
  34. ^DeVeale B, van der Kooy D, Babak T (2012)."Critical evaluation of imprinted gene expression by RNA-Seq: a new perspective".PLOS Genetics.8(3): e1002600.doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002600.PMC3315459.PMID22479196.
  35. ^abMagee DA, Spillane C, Berkowicz EW, Sikora KM, MacHugh DE (August 2014). "Imprinted loci in domestic livestock species as epigenomic targets for artificial selection of complex traits".Animal Genetics.45(Suppl 1): 25–39.doi:10.1111/age.12168.PMID24990393.
  36. ^Magee DA, Sikora KM, Berkowicz EW, Berry DP, Howard DJ, Mullen MP, et al. (October 2010)."DNA sequence polymorphisms in a panel of eight candidate bovine imprinted genes and their association with performance traits in Irish Holstein-Friesian cattle".BMC Genetics.11:93.doi:10.1186/1471-2156-11-93.PMC2965127.PMID20942903.
  37. ^Cattanach BM, Kirk M (1985). "Differential activity of maternally and paternally derived chromosome regions in mice".Nature.315(6019): 496–498.Bibcode:1985Natur.315..496C.doi:10.1038/315496a0.PMID4000278.S2CID4337753.
  38. ^McLaughlin KJ, Szabó P, Haegel H, Mann JR (January 1996). "Mouse embryos with paternal duplication of an imprinted chromosome 7 region die at midgestation and lack placental spongiotrophoblast".Development.122(1): 265–270.doi:10.1242/dev.122.1.265.PMID8565838.
  39. ^Beechey C, Cattanach BM, Lake A, Peters J (2008)."Mouse Imprinting Data and References".MRC Harwell. Archived fromthe originalon 2012-07-03.Retrieved2008-07-02.
  40. ^Bartolomei MS, Tilghman SM (1997)."Genomic imprinting in mammals".Annual Review of Genetics.31:493–525.doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.31.1.493.PMC3941233.PMID9442905.
  41. ^Kobayashi H, Yamada K, Morita S, Hiura H, Fukuda A, Kagami M, et al. (May 2009)."Identification of the mouse paternally expressed imprinted gene Zdbf2 on chromosome 1 and its imprinted human homolog ZDBF2 on chromosome 2".Genomics.93(5): 461–472.doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2008.12.012.PMID19200453.
  42. ^Bjornsson HT, Albert TJ, Ladd-Acosta CM, Green RD, Rongione MA, Middle CM, et al. (May 2008)."SNP-specific array-based allele-specific expression analysis".Genome Research.18(5): 771–779.doi:10.1101/gr.073254.107.PMC2336807.PMID18369178.
  43. ^Babak T, Deveale B, Armour C, Raymond C, Cleary MA, van der Kooy D, et al. (November 2008)."Global survey of genomic imprinting by transcriptome sequencing".Current Biology.18(22): 1735–1741.Bibcode:2008CBio...18.1735B.doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.09.044.PMID19026546.S2CID10143690.
  44. ^Luedi PP, Dietrich FS, Weidman JR, Bosko JM, Jirtle RL, Hartemink AJ (December 2007)."Computational and experimental identification of novel human imprinted genes".Genome Research.17(12): 1723–1730.doi:10.1101/gr.6584707.PMC2099581.PMID18055845.
  45. ^Reik W;Dean W; Walter J (August 2001). "Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development".Science.293(5532): 1089–1093.doi:10.1126/science.1063443.PMID11498579.S2CID17089710.
  46. ^Court F, Tayama C, Romanelli V, Martin-Trujillo A, Iglesias-Platas I, Okamura K, et al. (April 2014)."Genome-wide parent-of-origin DNA methylation analysis reveals the intricacies of human imprinting and suggests a germline methylation-independent mechanism of establishment".Genome Research.24(4): 554–569.doi:10.1101/gr.164913.113.PMC3975056.PMID24402520.
  47. ^Mancini-Dinardo D, Steele SJ, Levorse JM, Ingram RS, Tilghman SM (May 2006)."Elongation of the Kcnq1ot1 transcript is required for genomic imprinting of neighboring genes".Genes & Development.20(10): 1268–1282.doi:10.1101/gad.1416906.PMC1472902.PMID16702402.
  48. ^Jin B, Li Y, Robertson KD (June 2011)."DNA methylation: superior or subordinate in the epigenetic hierarchy?".Genes & Cancer.2(6): 607–617.doi:10.1177/1947601910393957.PMC3174260.PMID21941617.
  49. ^Metz CW (1938). "Chromosome behavior, inheritance and sex determination inSciara".American Naturalist.72(743): 485–520.doi:10.1086/280803.JSTOR2457532.S2CID83550755.
  50. ^Alleman M, Doctor J (June 2000). "Genomic imprinting in plants: observations and evolutionary implications".Plant Molecular Biology.43(2–3): 147–161.doi:10.1023/A:1006419025155.PMID10999401.S2CID9499846.
  51. ^abTycko B, Morison IM (September 2002)."Physiological functions of imprinted genes".Journal of Cellular Physiology.192(3): 245–258.doi:10.1002/jcp.10129.PMID12124770.S2CID42971427.
  52. ^Constância M; Pickard B; Kelsey G;Reik W(September 1998)."Imprinting mechanisms".Genome Research.8(9): 881–900.doi:10.1101/gr.8.9.881.PMID9750189.
  53. ^abMoore T, Haig D (February 1991). "Genomic imprinting in mammalian development: a parental tug-of-war".Trends in Genetics.7(2): 45–49.doi:10.1016/0168-9525(91)90230-N.PMID2035190.
  54. ^Haig D(November 1997)."Parental antagonism, relatedness asymmetries, and genomic imprinting".Proceedings. Biological Sciences.264(1388): 1657–1662.Bibcode:1997RSPSB.264.1657H.doi:10.1098/rspb.1997.0230.PMC1688715.PMID9404029.
  55. ^Haig D (2000). "The kinship theory of genomic imprinting".Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics.31:9–32.doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.9.
  56. ^McElroy JP, Kim JJ, Harry DE, Brown SR, Dekkers JC, Lamont SJ (April 2006)."Identification of trait loci affecting white meat percentage and other growth and carcass traits in commercial broiler chickens".Poultry Science.85(4): 593–605.doi:10.1093/ps/85.4.593.PMID16615342.
  57. ^Tuiskula-Haavisto M, Vilkki J (2007). "Parent-of-origin specific QTL--a possibility towards understanding reciprocal effects in chicken and the origin of imprinting".Cytogenetic and Genome Research.117(1–4): 305–312.doi:10.1159/000103192.PMID17675872.S2CID27834663.
  58. ^abO'Connell MJ, Loughran NB, Walsh TA, Donoghue MT, Schmid KJ, Spillane C (October 2010). "A phylogenetic approach to test for evidence of parental conflict or gene duplications associated with protein-encoding imprinted orthologous genes in placental mammals".Mammalian Genome.21(9–10): 486–498.doi:10.1007/s00335-010-9283-5.PMID20931201.S2CID6883377.
  59. ^abKeverne EB, Curley JP (June 2008)."Epigenetics, brain evolution and behaviour"(PDF).Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology.29(3): 398–412.doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2008.03.001.PMID18439660.S2CID10697086.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 2010-06-22.Retrieved2011-01-06.
  60. ^Wolf JB (May 2009). "Cytonuclear interactions can favor the evolution of genomic imprinting".Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution.63(5): 1364–1371.doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00632.x.PMID19425202.S2CID29251471.
  61. ^abPardo-Manuel de Villena F, de la Casa-Esperón E, Sapienza C (December 2000). "Natural selection and the function of genome imprinting: beyond the silenced minority".Trends in Genetics.16(12): 573–579.doi:10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02134-X.PMID11102708.
  62. ^abde la Casa-Esperón E, Sapienza C (2003). "Natural selection and the evolution of genome imprinting".Annual Review of Genetics.37:349–370.doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.143741.PMID14616065.
  63. ^Barlow DP (April 1993). "Methylation and imprinting: from host defense to gene regulation?".Science.260(5106): 309–310.Bibcode:1993Sci...260..309B.doi:10.1126/science.8469984.PMID8469984.S2CID6925971.
  64. ^Chai JH, Locke DP, Ohta T, Greally JM, Nicholls RD (November 2001). "Retrotransposed genes such as Frat3 in the mouse Chromosome 7C Prader-Willi syndrome region acquire the imprinted status of their insertion site".Mammalian Genome.12(11): 813–821.doi:10.1007/s00335-001-2083-1.PMID11845283.S2CID13419814.
  65. ^abcdLawson HA, Cheverud JM, Wolf JB (September 2013)."Genomic imprinting and parent-of-origin effects on complex traits".Nature Reviews. Genetics.14(9): 609–617.doi:10.1038/nrg3543.PMC3926806.PMID23917626.
  66. ^de Koning DJ, Rattink AP, Harlizius B, van Arendonk JA, Brascamp EW, Groenen MA (July 2000)."Genome-wide scan for body composition in pigs reveals important role of imprinting".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.97(14): 7947–7950.Bibcode:2000PNAS...97.7947D.doi:10.1073/pnas.140216397.PMC16650.PMID10859367.
  67. ^abHoeschele I (2004-07-15). "Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci in Outbred Pedigrees".Handbook of Statistical Genetics.John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.doi:10.1002/0470022620.bbc17.ISBN0-470-02262-0.
  68. ^Wolf JB, Cheverud JM, Roseman C, Hager R (June 2008)."Genome-wide analysis reveals a complex pattern of genomic imprinting in mice".PLOS Genetics.4(6): e1000091.doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000091.PMC2390766.PMID18535661.
  69. ^Winstead ER (2001-05-07)."The Legacy of Solid Gold".Genome News Network.
  70. ^Lazaraviciute G, Kauser M, Bhattacharya S, Haggarty P, Bhattacharya S (2014)."A systematic review and meta-analysis of DNA methylation levels and imprinting disorders in children conceived by IVF/ICSI compared with children conceived spontaneously".Human Reproduction Update.20(6): 840–852.doi:10.1093/humupd/dmu033.PMID24961233.
  71. ^abRotondo JC, Selvatici R, Di Domenico M, Marci R, Vesce F, Tognon M, Martini F (September 2013)."Methylation loss at H19 imprinted gene correlates with methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene promoter hypermethylation in semen samples from infertile males".Epigenetics.8(9): 990–997.doi:10.4161/epi.25798.PMC3883776.PMID23975186.
  72. ^Russell-Smith, Suzanna (2012).The Relationship Between the Autism and Schizophrenia Spectra: An Investigation at the Trait and Cognitive Levels(PhD). Perth: University of Western Australia.
  73. ^Ragsdale G, Foley RA (July 2012)."Testing the imprinted brain: parent-of-origin effects on empathy and systemizing".Evolution and Human Behavior.33(4): 402–410.doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.12.002.
  74. ^Dickins BJA, Dickins DW, Dickins TE (2008)."Is this conjectural phenotypic dichotomy a plausible outcome of genomic imprinting?"(PDF).Behavioral and Brain Sciences.31(3): 267–268.doi:10.1017/S0140525X08004287.
  75. ^Yu Y, Xu F, Peng H, Fang X, Zhao S, Li Y, et al. (January 1999)."NOEY2 (ARHI), an imprinted putative tumor suppressor gene in ovarian and breast carcinomas".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.96(1): 214–219.Bibcode:1999PNAS...96..214Y.doi:10.1073/pnas.96.1.214.PMC15119.PMID9874798.
  76. ^Allis CD, Jenuwein T, Reinberg D (2007).Epigenetics.CSHL Press. p. 440.ISBN978-0-87969-724-2.Retrieved10 November2010.
  77. ^Scharfmann R (2007).Development of the Pancreas and Neonatal Diabetes.Karger Publishers. pp. 113–.ISBN978-3-8055-8385-5.Retrieved10 November2010.
  78. ^Herrick G, Seger J (1999). "Imprinting and Paternal Genome Elimination in Insects". In Ohlsson R (ed.).Genomic Imprinting.Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation. Vol. 25. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 41–71.doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69111-2_3.ISBN978-3-662-21956-0.PMID10339741.
  79. ^Bresnahan et al., "Examining parent-of-origin effects on transcription and RNA methylation in mediating aggressive behavior in honey bees (Apis mellifera)", BMC Genomics 24: 315 (2023),https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-023-09411-4
  80. ^Griffith OW, Brandley MC, Belov K, Thompson MB (March 2016). "Allelic expression of mammalian imprinted genes in a matrotrophic lizard, Pseudemoia entrecasteauxii".Development Genes and Evolution.226(2): 79–85.doi:10.1007/s00427-016-0531-x.PMID26943808.S2CID14643386.
  81. ^Magee DA, Berry DP, Berkowicz EW, Sikora KM, Howard DJ, Mullen MP, et al. (January 2011)."Single nucleotide polymorphisms within the bovine DLK1-DIO3 imprinted domain are associated with economically important production traits in cattle".The Journal of Heredity.102(1): 94–101.doi:10.1093/jhered/esq097.PMID20817761.
  82. ^Sikora KM, Magee DA, Berkowicz EW, Berry DP, Howard DJ, Mullen MP, et al. (January 2011)."DNA sequence polymorphisms within the bovine guanine nucleotide-binding protein Gs subunit alpha (Gsα)-encoding (GNAS) genomic imprinting domain are associated with performance traits".BMC Genetics.12:4.doi:10.1186/1471-2156-12-4.PMC3025900.PMID21214909.
  83. ^Berkowicz EW, Magee DA, Sikora KM, Berry DP, Howard DJ, Mullen MP, et al. (February 2011). "Single nucleotide polymorphisms at the imprinted bovine insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2) locus are associated with dairy performance in Irish Holstein-Friesian cattle".The Journal of Dairy Research.78(1): 1–8.doi:10.1017/S0022029910000567.hdl:11019/377.PMID20822563.
  84. ^Bonthuis PJ, Steinwand S, Stacher Hörndli CN, Emery J, Huang WC, Kravitz S, et al. (March 2022)."Noncanonical genomic imprinting in the monoamine system determines naturalistic foraging and brain-adrenal axis functions".Cell Reports.38(10): 110500.doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110500.PMC9128000.PMID35263575.
  85. ^Robitzski D (12 April 2022)."Mouse Foraging Behavior Shaped by Opposite-Sex Parent's Genes".The Scientist.
  86. ^Garnier O, Laoueillé-Duprat S, Spillane C (2008)."Genomic imprinting in plants".Epigenetics.3(1): 14–20.doi:10.4161/epi.3.1.5554.PMID18259119.
  87. ^Nowack MK, Shirzadi R, Dissmeyer N, Dolf A, Endl E, Grini PE, Schnittger A (May 2007). "Bypassing genomic imprinting allows seed development".Nature.447(7142): 312–315.Bibcode:2007Natur.447..312N.doi:10.1038/nature05770.hdl:11858/00-001M-0000-0012-3877-6.PMID17468744.S2CID4396777.
  88. ^Köhler C, Mittelsten Scheid O, Erilova A (March 2010). "The impact of the triploid block on the origin and evolution of polyploid plants".Trends in Genetics.26(3): 142–148.doi:10.1016/j.tig.2009.12.006.PMID20089326.
  89. ^Picard CL, Gehring M (2020). "Identification and Comparison of Imprinted Genes Across Plant Species". In Spillane C, McKeown P (eds.).Plant Epigenetics and Epigenomics.Methods in Molecular Biology. Vol. 2093. New York, NY: Springer US. pp. 173–201.doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-0179-2_13.ISBN978-1-0716-0178-5.PMID32088897.S2CID211261218.
  90. ^Wyder S, Raissig MT, Grossniklaus U (February 2019)."Consistent Reanalysis of Genome-wide Imprinting Studies in Plants Using Generalized Linear Models Increases Concordance across Datasets".Scientific Reports.9(1): 1320.Bibcode:2019NatSR...9.1320W.doi:10.1038/s41598-018-36768-4.PMC6362150.PMID30718537.
  91. ^Anderson SN, Zhou P, Higgins K, Brandvain Y, Springer NM (April 2021)."Widespread imprinting of transposable elements and variable genes in the maize endosperm".PLOS Genetics.17(4): e1009491.doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1009491.PMC8057601.PMID33830994.
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genomic_imprinting&oldid=1239082478#disorders"